1
|
Kanukollu S, Spatz K, Lavery JA, Bender JG, Mauguen A, Mathew S. Safety and tolerability of intravenous aprepitant and fosaprepitant in children with cancer: A retrospective, single-center review. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024; 71:e30882. [PMID: 38267822 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
NK-1 receptor antagonists (NK1-RA) are key agents for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prevention in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Current pediatric practice guidelines recommend the use of intravenous fosaprepitant or oral aprepitant. However, there are reports of hypersensitivity reactions with fosaprepitant due to polysorbate 80. Intravenous aprepitant does not contain polysorbate 80, but its use in pediatric patients has not been described. In this retrospective, single-center study, 106 pediatric patients received either fosaprepitant or intravenous aprepitant as part of their antiemetic regimen. Intravenous aprepitant was well tolerated and did not lead to any instances of hypersensitivity reactions requiring discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srivarshini Kanukollu
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Krisoula Spatz
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Julia Glade Bender
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Audrey Mauguen
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sherry Mathew
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kehl KL, Lavery JA, Brown S, Fuchs H, Riely G, Schrag D, Newcomb A, Nichols C, Micheel CM, Bedard PL, Sweeney SM, Fiandalo M, Panageas KS. Biomarker Inference and the Timing of Next-Generation Sequencing in a Multi-Institutional, Cross-Cancer Clinicogenomic Data Set. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300489. [PMID: 38484212 PMCID: PMC10954072 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Observational clinicogenomic data sets, consisting of tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) data linked to clinical records, are commonly used for cancer research. However, in real-world practice, oncologists frequently request NGS in search of treatment options for progressive cancer. The extent and impact of this dynamic on analysis of clinicogenomic research data are not well understood. METHODS We analyzed clinicogenomic data for patients with non-small cell lung, colorectal, breast, prostate, pancreatic, or urothelial cancers in the American Association for Cancer Research Biopharmaceutical Consortium cohort. Associations between baseline and time-varying clinical characteristics and time from diagnosis to NGS were measured. To explore the impact of informative cohort entry on biomarker inference, statistical interactions between selected biomarkers and time to NGS with respect to overall survival were calculated. RESULTS Among 7,182 patients, time from diagnosis to NGS varied significantly by clinical factors, including cancer type, calendar year of sequencing, institution, and age and stage at diagnosis. NGS rates also varied significantly by dynamic clinical status variables; in an adjusted model, compared with patients with stable disease at any given time after diagnosis, patients with progressive disease by imaging or oncologist assessment had higher NGS rates (hazard ratio for NGS, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.45 to 1.78] and 2.32 [95% CI, 2.01 to 2.67], respectively). Statistical interactions between selected biomarkers and time to NGS with respect to survival, potentially indicating biased biomarker inference results, were explored. CONCLUSION To evaluate the appropriateness of a data set for a particular research question, it is crucial to measure associations between dynamic cancer status and the timing of NGS, as well as to evaluate interactions involving biomarkers of interest and NGS timing with respect to survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth L. Kehl
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samantha Brown
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hannah Fuchs
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gregory Riely
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ashley Newcomb
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Chelsea Nichols
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Christine M. Micheel
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | | | - Katherine S. Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sanz-Garcia E, Brown S, Lavery JA, Weiss J, Fuchs HE, Newcomb A, Postle A, Warner JL, LeNoue-Newton ML, Sweeney SM, Pillai S, Yu C, Nichols C, Mastrogiacomo B, Kundra R, Schultz N, Kehl KL, Riely GJ, Schrag D, Govindarajan A, Panageas KS, Bedard PL. Genomic Characterization and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Peritoneal Metastases from the AACR GENIE Biopharma Collaborative Colorectal Cancer Registry. Cancer Res Commun 2024; 4:475-486. [PMID: 38329392 PMCID: PMC10876516 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases (PM) are common in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to characterize patients with mCRC and PM from a clinical and molecular perspective using the American Association of Cancer Research Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) registry. Patients' tumor samples underwent targeted next-generation sequencing. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected retrospectively. Overall survival (OS) from advanced disease and progression-free survival (PFS) from start of cancer-directed drug regimen were estimated and adjusted for the left truncation bias. A total of 1,281 patients were analyzed, 244 (19%) had PM at time of advanced disease. PM were associated with female sex [OR: 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-2.54; P = 0.014] and higher histologic grade (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.08-2.71; P = 0.022), while rectal primary tumors were less frequent in patients with PM (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29-0.88; P < 0.001). APC occurred less frequently in patients with PM (N = 151, 64% vs. N = 788, 79%) while MED12 alterations occurred more frequently in patients with PM (N = 20, 10% vs. N = 32, 4%); differences in MED12 were not significant when restricting to oncogenic and likely oncogenic variants according to OncoKB. Patients with PM had worse OS (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.16-1.81) after adjustment for independently significant clinical and genomic predictors. PFS from initiation of first-line treatment did not differ by presence of PM. In conclusion, PM were more frequent in females and right-sided primary tumors. Differences in frequencies of MED12 and APC alterations were identified between patients with and without PM. PM were associated with shorter OS but not with PFS from first-line treatment. SIGNIFICANCE Utilizing the GENIE BPC registry, this study found that PM in patients with colorectal cancer occur more frequently in females and right-sided primary tumors and are associated with worse OS. In addition, we found a lower frequency of APC alterations and a higher frequency in MED12 alterations in patients with PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Sanz-Garcia
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre – University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samantha Brown
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Jessica Weiss
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre – University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Asha Postle
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Shawn M. Sweeney
- American Association of Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Shirin Pillai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Celeste Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre – University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Ritika Kundra
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anand Govindarajan
- Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Philippe L. Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre – University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lavery JA, Boutros PC, Knight D, Tammela T, Moskowitz CS, Jones LW. Association of exercise with pan-cancer incidence and overall survival. Cancer Cell 2024; 42:169-171. [PMID: 38181796 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Lavery et al. show that the association between exercise and risk of cancer varied as a function of organ site and amount of exercise. Exercise was also associated with a longevity benefit regardless of a cancer diagnosis or not. This study further highlights the importance of exercise as an effective cancer preventive strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Precision Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Knight
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tuomas Tammela
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Lee W Jones
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Bruijn I, Kundra R, Mastrogiacomo B, Tran TN, Sikina L, Mazor T, Li X, Ochoa A, Zhao G, Lai B, Abeshouse A, Baiceanu D, Ciftci E, Dogrusoz U, Dufilie A, Erkoc Z, Garcia Lara E, Fu Z, Gross B, Haynes C, Heath A, Higgins D, Jagannathan P, Kalletla K, Kumari P, Lindsay J, Lisman A, Leenknegt B, Lukasse P, Madela D, Madupuri R, van Nierop P, Plantalech O, Quach J, Resnick AC, Rodenburg SY, Satravada BA, Schaeffer F, Sheridan R, Singh J, Sirohi R, Sumer SO, van Hagen S, Wang A, Wilson M, Zhang H, Zhu K, Rusk N, Brown S, Lavery JA, Panageas KS, Rudolph JE, LeNoue-Newton ML, Warner JL, Guo X, Hunter-Zinck H, Yu TV, Pilai S, Nichols C, Gardos SM, Philip J, Kehl KL, Riely GJ, Schrag D, Lee J, Fiandalo MV, Sweeney SM, Pugh TJ, Sander C, Cerami E, Gao J, Schultz N. Analysis and Visualization of Longitudinal Genomic and Clinical Data from the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative in cBioPortal. Cancer Res 2023; 83:3861-3867. [PMID: 37668528 PMCID: PMC10690089 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-0816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
International cancer registries make real-world genomic and clinical data available, but their joint analysis remains a challenge. AACR Project GENIE, an international cancer registry collecting data from 19 cancer centers, makes data from >130,000 patients publicly available through the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (https://genie.cbioportal.org). For 25,000 patients, additional real-world longitudinal clinical data, including treatment and outcome data, are being collected by the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative using the PRISSMM data curation model. Several thousand of these cases are now also available in cBioPortal. We have significantly enhanced the functionalities of cBioPortal to support the visualization and analysis of this rich clinico-genomic linked dataset, as well as datasets generated by other centers and consortia. Examples of these enhancements include (i) visualization of the longitudinal clinical and genomic data at the patient level, including timelines for diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes; (ii) the ability to select samples based on treatment status, facilitating a comparison of molecular and clinical attributes between samples before and after a specific treatment; and (iii) survival analysis estimates based on individual treatment regimens received. Together, these features provide cBioPortal users with a toolkit to interactively investigate complex clinico-genomic data to generate hypotheses and make discoveries about the impact of specific genomic variants on prognosis and therapeutic sensitivities in cancer. SIGNIFICANCE Enhanced cBioPortal features allow clinicians and researchers to effectively investigate longitudinal clinico-genomic data from patients with cancer, which will improve exploration of data from the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative and similar datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ino de Bruijn
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ritika Kundra
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Luke Sikina
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tali Mazor
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xiang Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Angelica Ochoa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gaofei Zhao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bryan Lai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adam Abeshouse
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Ersin Ciftci
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Ziya Erkoc
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Zhaoyuan Fu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Benjamin Gross
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles Haynes
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Allison Heath
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David Higgins
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Priti Kumari
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Caris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas
| | | | - Aaron Lisman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Divya Madela
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Joyce Quach
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam C. Resnick
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rajat Sirohi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Avery Wang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manda Wilson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hongxin Zhang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kelsey Zhu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nicole Rusk
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Samantha Brown
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Xindi Guo
- Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Shirin Pilai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - John Philip
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jocelyn Lee
- American Association for Cancer Research: Project GENIE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael V. Fiandalo
- American Association for Cancer Research: Project GENIE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Shawn M. Sweeney
- American Association for Cancer Research: Project GENIE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Trevor J. Pugh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Ethan Cerami
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jianjiong Gao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Caris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lavery JA, Boutros PC, Scott JM, Tammela T, Moskowitz CS, Jones LW. Pan-Cancer Analysis of Postdiagnosis Exercise and Mortality. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4982-4992. [PMID: 37651670 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The impact of postdiagnosis exercise on cause-specific mortality in cancer survivors and whether this differs on the basis of cancer site is unclear. METHODS We performed an analysis of 11,480 patients with cancer enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian cancer screening trial. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer completing a standardized survey quantifying exercise after diagnosis were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM); secondary end points were cancer mortality and mortality from other causes. Cox models were used to estimate the cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) for ACM, cancer, and noncancer mortality as a function of meeting exercise guidelines versus not meeting guidelines with adjustment for important clinical covariates. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 16 years from diagnosis, 4,665 deaths were documented (1,940 due to cancer and 2,725 due to other causes). In multivariable analyses, exercise consistent with guidelines was associated with a 25% reduced risk of ACM compared with nonexercise (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.80). Compared with nonexercise, exercise consistent with guidelines was associated with a significant reduction in cancer mortality (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.88) and mortality from other causes (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.78). The inverse relationship between exercise and cause-specific mortality varied by exercise dose. Exercise consistent with guidelines was associated with a reduced hazard of ACM for multiple cancer sites. Reduction in cancer mortality for exercisers was only observed in head and neck and renal cancer. CONCLUSION In this pan-cancer sample of long-term cancer survivors, exercise consistent with guidelines was associated with substantial ACM benefit driven by both reductions in cancer and noncancer mortality. The cause-specific impact of exercise differed as a function of cancer site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Precision Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jessica M Scott
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Tuomas Tammela
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Lee W Jones
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sia TY, Manning-Geist BL, Ehmann S, Lavery JA, Luardo C, Praiss A, Iasonos A, Sonoda Y, Grisham RN, Liu YL, Broach V, Zivanovic O, Long Roche K, Gardner GJ, Chi DS. Leave it in the past - primary treatment modality for high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer is not associated with secondary cytoreduction outcomes: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 176:69-75. [PMID: 37454565 PMCID: PMC10530358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare outcomes of patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who underwent secondary cytoreduction surgery (SCS) after up-front treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS). METHODS Patients with high-grade EOC who underwent SCS from 2/1/2004-10/31/2021 were classified by up-front treatment. Clinical and treatment characteristics were compared between cohorts. Progression-free survival (PFS2) and overall survival (OS2) following SCS were compared using a Cox model adjusted for stage, age at SCS, and number of years between end of chemotherapy and SCS. RESULTS Of 374 patients, 62 (17%) underwent NACT-IDS and 312 (83%) PDS. Justification for NACT was disease extent (n = 57, 92%), comorbidities (n = 3, 5%), and thromboembolism (n = 2, 3%). The NACT-IDS cohort had a higher median age at SCS (64 years [IQR: 56-70] vs 59 years [IQR: 53-66]; P = .03), higher proportion of stage III/IV disease (100% vs 81%; P < .001), and shorter median interval between end of chemotherapy and SCS (1.5 years [IQR: 1.1-2.3] vs 1.9 years [IQR: 1.3-3.1]; P = .01). Achievement of complete gross resection at SCS did not differ between NACT-IDS and PDS (84% vs 88%; P = .18). PFS2 (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.83-1.71) and OS2 (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.57-1.63) did not vary by primary treatment modality after adjusting for clinically relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS Despite more extensive disease at presentation, patients with high-grade EOC who recur after NACT-IDS seem to have similar surgical and survival outcomes after SCS compared to patients who recur after PDS, suggesting that prior NACT-IDS should not preclude SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y Sia
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Beryl L Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Sarah Ehmann
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Carrie Luardo
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Aaron Praiss
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Ying L Liu
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Choudhury NJ, Lavery JA, Brown S, de Bruijn I, Jee J, Tran TN, Rizvi H, Arbour KC, Whiting K, Shen R, Hellmann M, Bedard PL, Yu C, Leighl N, LeNoue-Newton M, Micheel C, Warner JL, Ginsberg MS, Plodkowski A, Girshman J, Sawan P, Pillai S, Sweeney SM, Kehl KL, Panageas KS, Schultz N, Schrag D, Riely GJ. The GENIE BPC NSCLC Cohort: A Real-World Repository Integrating Standardized Clinical and Genomic Data for 1,846 Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3418-3428. [PMID: 37223888 PMCID: PMC10472103 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe the clinical and genomic landscape of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A total of 1,846 patients with NSCLC whose tumors were sequenced from 2014 to 2018 at four institutions participating in AACR GENIE were randomly chosen for curation using the PRISSMM data model. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated for patients treated with standard therapies. RESULTS In this cohort, 44% of tumors harbored a targetable oncogenic alteration, with EGFR (20%), KRAS G12C (13%), and oncogenic fusions (ALK, RET, and ROS1; 5%) as the most frequent. Median OS (mOS) on first-line platinum-based therapy without immunotherapy was 17.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.9-19.5 months]. For second-line therapies, mOS was 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.5-11.3 months) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.1-8.1 months) for docetaxel ± ramucirumab. In a subset of patients treated with ICI in the second-line or later setting, median RECIST PFS (2.5 months; 95% CI, 2.2-2.8) and median real-world PFS based on imaging reports (2.2 months; 95% CI, 1.7-2.6) were similar. In exploratory analysis of the impact of tumor mutational burden (TMB) on survival on ICI treatment in the second-line or higher setting, TMB z-score harmonized across gene panels was associated with improved OS (univariable HR, 0.85; P = 0.03; n = 247 patients). CONCLUSIONS The GENIE BPC cohort provides comprehensive clinicogenomic data for patients with NSCLC, which can improve understanding of real-world patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noura J. Choudhury
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Samantha Brown
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ino de Bruijn
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Justin Jee
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Thinh Ngoc Tran
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Kathryn C. Arbour
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Karissa Whiting
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ronglai Shen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Philippe L. Bedard
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Celeste Yu
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha Leighl
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michele LeNoue-Newton
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Christine Micheel
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jeremy L. Warner
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island
- Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Michelle S. Ginsberg
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Plodkowski
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey Girshman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Peter Sawan
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Shirin Pillai
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Shawn M. Sweeney
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth L. Kehl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katherine S. Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Gregory J. Riely
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sweeney SM, Lavery JA, Fuchs HE, Lee JA, Brown S, Panageas KS, Sawyers CL, Bedard PL. Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in AACR project GENIE. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:81. [PMID: 37653066 PMCID: PMC10471569 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00425-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Grants
- Dr. Jocelyn Lee owns stock in Abbott and Gilead Sciences. Dr. Lee is the Associate Director of AACR Project GENIE. AAACR Project GENIE received funding from Amgen, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Pfizer, AstraZeneca UK Limited, Genentech, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Dr. Shawn Sweeney has an immediate family member who works for ConcertAI. He is a science advisor to Bayer Healthcare. Dr. Sweeney is the Senior Director of AACR Project GENIE. AACR Project GENIE received funding from Amgen, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Pfizer, AstraZeneca UK Limited, Genentech, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- A portion of Jessica Lavery’s support is paid by AACR Project GENIE. AAAACR Project GENIE received funding from Amgen, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Pfizer, AstraZeneca UK Limited, Genentech, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- A portion of Hannah Fuch’s support is paid by AACR Project GENIE. AAAACR Project GENIE received funding from Amgen, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Pfizer, AstraZeneca UK Limited, Genentech, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- A portion of Samantha Brown’s support is paid by AACR Project GENIE. AACR Project GENIE received funding from Amgen, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Pfizer, AstraZeneca UK Limited, Genentech, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Dr. Katherine Panageas owns stock in Adicet Bio, Codexis, Chinook Therapeutics, T2 Biosystems, Vincerx Pharma, and 23andMe. A portion of Dr. Panageas’ support is paid by AACR Project GENIE. AACR Project GENIE received funding from Amgen, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Pfizer, AstraZeneca UK Limited, Genentech, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Dr. Charles Sawyers serves on the Board of Directors of Novartis, is a co-founder of ORIC Pharmaceuticals and co-inventor of enzalutamide and apalutamide. He is a science advisor to Arsenal, Beigene, Blueprint, Column Group, Foghorn, Housey Pharma, Nextech, KSQ and PMV.
- Dr. Phillipe Bedard serves as science advisor to Seattle Genetics, Elli Lilly and Co., Amgen, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca UK Limited, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Bicara, Zymeworks, Medicenna, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn M Sweeney
- AACR Project GENIE, American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hannah E Fuchs
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jocelyn A Lee
- AACR Project GENIE, American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Samantha Brown
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles L Sawyers
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, University Health Network - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thompson HM, Bates DDB, Pernicka JG, Park SJ, Nourbakhsh M, Fuqua JL, Fiasconaro M, Lavery JA, Wei IH, Pappou EP, Smith JJ, Nash GM, Weiser MR, Paty PB, Garcia-Aguilar J, Widmar M. ASO Visual Abstract: MRI Assessment of Extramural Venous Invasion Before and After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and its Association with Disease-Free and Overall Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3967-3968. [PMID: 37085657 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13290-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David D B Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Sun Jin Park
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mahra Nourbakhsh
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - James L Fuqua
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Megan Fiasconaro
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Iris H Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmanouil P Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip B Paty
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Widmar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thompson HM, Bates DDB, Pernicka JG, Park SJ, Nourbakhsh M, Fuqua JL, Fiasconaro M, Lavery JA, Wei IH, Pappou EP, Smith JJ, Nash GM, Weiser MR, Paty PB, Garcia-Aguilar J, Widmar M. MRI Assessment of Extramural Venous Invasion Before and After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Its Association with Disease-Free and Overall Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3957-3965. [PMID: 36964328 PMCID: PMC10394736 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13225-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) on baseline MRI is associated with poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This study investigated the association of persistent EMVI after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) (chemoradiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy) with survival. METHODS Baseline MRI, post-TNT MRI, and surgical pathology data from 175 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent TNT and total mesorectal excision between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed for evidence of EMVI. Two radiologists assessed EMVI status with disagreement adjudicated by a third. Pathologic EMVI status was assessed per departmental standards. Cox regression models evaluated the associations between EMVI and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS EMVI regression on both post-TNT MRI and surgical pathology was associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.64) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.68). In an exploratory analysis of 35 patients with EMVI on baseline MRI, only six had EMVI on pathology compared with 18 on post-TNT MRI; these findings were not associated (p = 0.2). Longer disease-free survival was seen with regression on both modalities compared with remaining positive. Regression on pathology alone, independent of MRI EMVI status, was associated with similar improvements in survival. CONCLUSIONS Baseline EMVI is associated with poor prognosis even after TNT. EMVI regression on surgical pathology is common even with persistent EMVI on post-TNT MRI. EMVI regression on surgical pathology is associated with improved DFS, while the utility of post-TNT MRI EMVI persistence for decision-making and prognosis remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David D B Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sun Jin Park
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mahra Nourbakhsh
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James L Fuqua
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan Fiasconaro
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iris H Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmanouil P Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip B Paty
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Widmar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kung A, Li DG, Lavery JA, Narang B, Diamond L. Characteristics of Cancer Hospitals with Written Language Access Policies. J Immigr Minor Health 2023; 25:282-290. [PMID: 36136231 PMCID: PMC10276971 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-022-01399-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Patients with limited English proficiency receive worse care due to communication barriers. Little is known about which cancer hospitals have written language access policies addressing bilingual clinicians. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of healthcare organizations, matching survey data to American Hospital Association Survey and American Community Survey data. We analyzed characteristics associated with hospitals having bilingual clinician policies. The response rate was 71% (127/178). Many hospitals (53 [42%]) did not have written policies on bilingual clinicians. Having bilingual clinicians available at the hospital was associated with having a written policy on bilingual clinicians, while being an NCORP site was associated with not having a written policy on bilingual clinicians. Patient demographic characteristics were not associated with hospitals having written policies on bilingual clinicians. A substantial proportion of cancer hospitals do not have policies that cover language use by bilingual clinicians, particularly at NCORP sites. Having written policies on bilingual clinicians has the potential to mitigate cancer disparities by facilitating accountability, improving communication, and reducing errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Kung
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Diane G Li
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bharat Narang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Diamond
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kehl KL, Uno H, Gusev A, Groha S, Brown S, Lavery JA, Schrag D, Panageas KS. Elucidating Analytic Bias Due to Informative Cohort Entry in Cancer Clinico-genomic Datasets. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:344-352. [PMID: 36626408 PMCID: PMC9992002 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncologists often order genomic testing to inform treatment for worsening cancer. The resulting correlation between genomic testing timing and prognosis, or "informative entry," can bias observational clinico-genomic research. The efficacy of existing approaches to this problem in clinico-genomic cohorts is poorly understood. METHODS We simulated clinico-genomic cohorts followed from an index date to death. Subgroups in each cohort who underwent genomic testing before death were "observed." We varied data generation parameters under four scenarios: (i) independent testing and survival times; (ii) correlated testing and survival times for all patients; (iii) correlated testing and survival times for a subset of patients; and (iv) testing and mortality exclusively following progression events. We examined the behavior of conditional Kendall tau (Tc) statistics, Cox entry time coefficients, and biases in overall survival (OS) estimation and biomarker inference across scenarios. RESULTS Scenario #1 yielded null Tc and Cox entry time coefficients and unbiased OS inference. Scenario #2 yielded positive Tc, negative Cox entry time coefficients, underestimated OS, and biomarker associations biased toward the null. Scenario #3 yielded negative Tc, positive Cox entry time coefficients, and underestimated OS, but biomarker estimates were less biased. Scenario #4 yielded null Tc and Cox entry time coefficients, underestimated OS, and biased biomarker estimates. Transformation and copula modeling did not provide unbiased results. CONCLUSIONS Approaches to informative clinico-genomic cohort entry, including Tc and Cox entry time statistics, are sensitive to heterogeneity in genotyping and survival time distributions. IMPACT Novel methods are needed for unbiased inference using observational clinico-genomic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth L. Kehl
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Hajime Uno
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Stefan Groha
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Samantha Brown
- Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Departments of Medicine, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Katherine S. Panageas
- Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lavery JA, Brown S, Curry MA, Martin A, Sjoberg DD, Whiting K. A data processing pipeline for the AACR project GENIE biopharma collaborative data with the {genieBPC} R package. Bioinformatics 2023; 39:6909009. [PMID: 36519837 PMCID: PMC9822536 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION Data from the American Association for Cancer Research Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange Biopharma Collaborative (GENIE BPC) represent comprehensive clinical data linked to high-throughput sequencing data, providing a multi-institution, pan-cancer, publicly available data repository. GENIE BPC data provide detailed demographic, clinical, treatment, genomic and outcome data for patients with cancer. These data result in a unique observational database of molecularly characterized tumors with comprehensive clinical annotation that can be used for health outcomes and precision medicine research in oncology. Due to the inherently complex structure of the multiple phenomic and genomic datasets, the use of these data requires a robust process for data integration and preparation in order to build analytic models. RESULTS We present the {genieBPC} package, a user-friendly data processing pipeline to facilitate the creation of analytic cohorts from the GENIE BPC data that are ready for clinico-genomic modeling and analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION {genieBPC} is available on CRAN and GitHub.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samantha Brown
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue New York, New York 10017, United States
| | - Michael A Curry
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue New York, New York 10017, United States
| | - Axel Martin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue New York, New York 10017, United States
| | - Daniel D Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue New York, New York 10017, United States
| | - Karissa Whiting
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Avenue New York, New York 10017, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Van Egeren D, Kohli K, Warner JL, Bedard PL, Riely G, Lepisto E, Schrag D, LeNoue-Newton M, Catalano P, Kehl KL, Michor F, Fiandalo M, Foti M, Khotskaya Y, Lee J, Peters N, Sweeney S, Abraham J, Brenton JD, Caldas C, Doherty G, Nimmervoll B, Pinilla K, Martin JE, Rueda OM, Sammut SJ, Silva D, Cao K, Heath AP, Li M, Lilly J, MacFarland S, Maris JM, Mason JL, Morgan AM, Resnick A, Welsh M, Zhu Y, Johnson B, Li Y, Sholl L, Beaudoin R, Biswas R, Cerami E, Cushing O, Dand D, Ducar M, Gusev A, Hahn WC, Haigis K, Hassett M, Janeway KA, Jänne P, Jawale A, Johnson J, Kehl KL, Kumari P, Laucks V, Lepisto E, Lindeman N, Lindsay J, Lueders A, Macconaill L, Manam M, Mazor T, Miller D, Newcomb A, Orechia J, Ovalle A, Postle A, Quinn D, Reardon B, Rollins B, Shivdasani P, Tramontano A, Van Allen E, Van Nostrand SC, Bell J, Datto MB, Green M, Hubbard C, McCall SJ, Mettu NB, Strickler JH, Andre F, Besse B, Deloger M, Dogan S, Italiano A, Loriot Y, Ludovic L, Michels S, Scoazec J, Tran-Dien A, Vassal G, Freeman CE, Hsiao SJ, Ingham M, Pang J, Rabadan R, Roman LC, Carvajal R, DuBois R, Arcila ME, Benayed R, Berger MF, Bhuiya M, Brannon AR, Brown S, Chakravarty D, Chu C, de Bruijn I, Galle J, Gao J, Gardos S, Gross B, Kundra R, Kung AL, Ladanyi M, Lavery JA, Li X, Lisman A, Mastrogiacomo B, McCarthy C, Nichols C, Ochoa A, Panageas KS, Philip J, Pillai S, Riely GJ, Rizvi H, Rudolph J, Sawyers CL, Schrag D, Schultz N, Schwartz J, Sheridan R, Solit D, Wang A, Wilson M, Zehir A, Zhang H, Zhao G, Ahmed L, Bedard PL, Bruce JP, Chow H, Cooke S, Del Rossi S, Felicen S, Hakgor S, Jagannathan P, Kamel-Reid S, Krishna G, Leighl N, Lu Z, Nguyen A, Oldfield L, Plagianakos D, Pugh TJ, Rizvi A, Sabatini P, Shah E, Singaravelan N, Siu L, Srivastava G, Stickle N, Stockley T, Tang M, Virtaenen C, Watt S, Yu C, Bernard B, Bifulco C, Cramer JL, Lee S, Piening B, Reynolds S, Slagel J, Tittel P, Urba W, VanCampen J, Weerasinghe R, Acebedo A, Guinney J, Guo X, Hunter-Zinck H, Yu T, Dang K, Anagnostou V, Baras A, Brahmer J, Gocke C, Scharpf RB, Tao J, Velculescu VE, Alexander S, Bailey N, Gold P, Bierkens M, de Graaf J, Hudeček J, Meijer GA, Monkhorst K, Samsom KG, Sanders J, Sonke G, ten Hoeve J, van de Velde T, van den Berg J, Voest E, Steinhardt G, Kadri S, Pankhuri W, Wang P, Segal J, Moung C, Espinosa-Mendez C, Martell HJ, Onodera C, Quintanar Alfaro A, Sweet-Cordero EA, Talevich E, Turski M, Van’t Veer L, Wren A, Aguilar S, Dienstmann R, Mancuso F, Nuciforo P, Tabernero J, Viaplana C, Vivancos A, Anderson I, Chaugai S, Coco J, Fabbri D, Johnson D, Jones L, Li X, Lovly C, Mishra S, Mittendorf K, Wen L, Yang YJ, Ye C, Holt M, LeNoue-Newton ML, Micheel CM, Park BH, Rubinstein SM, Stricker T, Wang L, Warner J, Guan M, Jin G, Liu L, Topaloglu U, Urtis C, Zhang W, D’Eletto M, Hutchison S, Longtine J, Walther Z. Genomic analysis of early-stage lung cancer reveals a role for TP53 mutations in distant metastasis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19055. [PMID: 36351964 PMCID: PMC9646734 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21448-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have distant metastases have a poor prognosis. To determine which genomic factors of the primary tumor are associated with metastasis, we analyzed data from 759 patients originally diagnosed with stage I-III NSCLC as part of the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative consortium. We found that TP53 mutations were significantly associated with the development of new distant metastases. TP53 mutations were also more prevalent in patients with a history of smoking, suggesting that these patients may be at increased risk for distant metastasis. Our results suggest that additional investigation of the optimal management of patients with early-stage NSCLC harboring TP53 mutations at diagnosis is warranted in light of their higher likelihood of developing new distant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Van Egeren
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA ,grid.2515.30000 0004 0378 8438Stem Cell Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA ,grid.5386.8000000041936877XDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | - Khushi Kohli
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Jeremy L. Warner
- grid.152326.10000 0001 2264 7217Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.152326.10000 0001 2264 7217Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Philippe L. Bedard
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Gregory Riely
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Eva Lepisto
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.429426.f0000 0000 9350 5788Present Address: Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, CT USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Michele LeNoue-Newton
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Paul Catalano
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Kenneth L. Kehl
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Franziska Michor
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA ,grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA ,grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910The Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XThe Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Michalski M, Rowed K, Lavery JA, Moskowitz CS, Capaci C, Stene G, Edvardsen E, Eves ND, Jones LW, Scott JM. Validity of Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer. JACC CardioOncol 2022; 4:210-219. [PMID: 35818548 PMCID: PMC9270626 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Estimated peak oxygen consumption (Vo2peak) is widely used in oncology; however, estimated Vo2peak equations were developed in noncancer settings. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of estimated Vo2peak in women with primary breast cancer and to develop oncology-specific estimated Vo2peak equations. Methods Vo2peak was directly measured (TrueOne 2400, Parvo Medics) during 380 cardiopulmonary exercise tests in women previously treated for breast cancer (mean age: 59 ± 10 years; 3.1 ± 1.2 years post-therapy). The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database (FRIEND), and heart failure (HF)-FRIEND equations were used to estimate Vo2peak. New equations were developed using patient and peak (Oncpeak) or submaximal (Oncsub) exercise test characteristics. Results The median differences between measured and estimated Vo2peak were 7.0 mL O2·kg−1·min−1, 3.9 mL O2·kg−1·min−1, and −0.2 mL O2·kg−1·min−1 for ACSM, FRIEND, and HF-FRIEND, respectively. The number of estimated Vo2peak values within ±3.5 mL O2·kg−1·min−1 of the measured values was 70 (18%), 164 (43%), and 306 (81%) for ACSM, FRIEND, and HF-FRIEND, respectively. The Oncpeak and OncSub models included body mass index, age, a history of chemotherapy or radiation, the peak measured heart rate, and the treadmill grade and/or speed. The median differences between measured and estimated Vo2peak were 0.02 mL O2·kg−1·min−1 (Oncpeak) and −0.2 mL O2·kg−1·min−1 (Oncsub). Eighty-six percent (n = 325) and 76% (n = 283) estimated Vo2peak values were within ±3.5 mL O2·kg−1·min−1 of the measured Vo2peak values for Oncpeak and Oncsub, respectively. Conclusions HF-FRIEND or oncology-specific equations could be applied to estimate Vo2peak in patients previously treated for breast cancer in settings where cardiopulmonary exercise tests are not available. (Trial Comparing the Effects of Linear Versus Nonlinear Aerobic Training in Women With Operable Breast Cancer [EXCITE]; NCT01186367
Collapse
|
17
|
Bartelstein MK, Forsberg JA, Lavery JA, Yakoub MA, Akhnoukh S, Boland PJ, Fabbri N, Healey JH. Quantitative preoperative patient assessments are related to survival and procedure outcome for osseous metastases. J Bone Oncol 2022; 34:100433. [PMID: 35615081 PMCID: PMC9125675 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Our objective was to determine if preoperative patient-reported assessments are associated with survival after surgery for stabilization of skeletal metastases. Patients and Methods All patients with metastatic cancer to bone and indications for skeletal stabilization surgery were approached to participate in a prospective cohort study at a tertiary care center from 2012 to 2017. Of the 208 patients who were eligible, 195 (94%) completed the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) preoperatively and underwent surgical treatment of skeletal metastases with complete or impending fractures; the sample encompassed a range of cancer diagnoses and included cases of both internal fixation and endoprosthetic replacement. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify associations between SF-36 scores and survival. Results In a model adjusted for clinical factors, patients' mental and physical SF-36 component summary scores were significantly associated with survival, as was their SF-36 composite score (P = 0.004, P = 0.015, and P < 0.001, respectively). Scores in the general health, vitality, and mental health domains were each strongly associated with survival (P < 0.001). Conclusions Patients' preoperative assessments of their health status are associated with their survival after surgery for skeletal metastases. Patient-reported assessments have the potential to contribute unique information to models that estimate patient survival, as part of efforts to provide optimal, individualized care and make informed decisions about the type and magnitude of surgery for metastatic bone disease that will last the patient's lifetime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith K. Bartelstein
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Jonathan A. Forsberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, 601 N Caroline St., 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Mohamed A. Yakoub
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Samuel Akhnoukh
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Patrick J. Boland
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Nicola Fabbri
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - John H. Healey
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bliss JW, Lavery JA, Underwood WP, Chun SS, Fickera GA, Lee CP, Corcoran S, Maloy MA, Polubriaginof FC, Kelly DW, Scott JM, Boutros PC, Moskowitz CS, Jones LW. Impact of Exercise on Susceptibility and Severity of COVID-19 in Patients with Cancer: A Retrospective Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1036-1042. [PMID: 35506245 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modifiable lifestyle-related factors heighten the risk and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with cancer. Whether exercise lowers susceptibility or severity is not known. METHODS We identified 944 cancer patients from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (mean age: 64; 85% female; 78% White) completing an exercise survey before receiving a confirmed positive or negative SARS-CoV-2 test. Exercise was defined as reporting moderate-intensity ≥5 days per week, ≥30 minutes/session or strenuous-intensity ≥3 days per week, ≥20 minutes/session. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between exercise and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity (i.e., composite of hospital admission or death events) with adjustment for clinical-epidemiologic covariates. RESULTS Twenty-four percent (230/944) of the overall cohort were diagnosed with COVID-19 and 35% (333/944) were exercisers. During a median follow-up of 10 months, 26% (156/611) of nonexercising patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 compared with 22% (74/333) of exercising patients. The adjusted OR for risk of COVID-19 was 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44-0.96, P = 0.03] for exercisers compared with nonexercisers. A total of 20% (47/230) of COVID-19 positive patients were hospitalized or died. No difference in the risk of severe COVID-19 as a function of exercise status was observed (P > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS Exercise may reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection in patients with a history of cancer, but not its severity. IMPACT This study provides the first data showing that exercise might lower the risk of COVID-19 in cancer patients, but further research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua W Bliss
- New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Su S Chun
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gina A Fickera
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Molly A Maloy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Daniel W Kelly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jessica M Scott
- New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Institute for Precision Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Chaya S Moskowitz
- New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lee W Jones
- New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tringale KR, Casey DL, Niyazov G, Lavery JA, Moskowitz C, Friedman DN, Wolden SL. Second cancer risk in childhood cancer survivors treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: An updated analysis of more than 10 years of follow-up. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29600. [PMID: 35234340 PMCID: PMC9476885 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear how intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) impacts long-term risk of second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) in childhood cancer patients. PROCEDURE Patients aged ≤21 years treated with IMRT between 1998 and 2009 and who survived ≥5 years after IMRT were included. SMN site in relation to isodose level (IDL) of IMRT was evaluated. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and excess absolute risks (EAR) were calculated. Cumulative incidences were estimated with death as a competing risk. RESULTS Three-hundred twenty-five patients were included with median follow-up of 11.2 years from IMRT (interquartile range: 9.4-14.0) among patients alive at the end of follow-up. Two hundred (62%) patients had ≥10 years of follow-up and 284 (87%) patients were alive at the time of analysis. Fifteen patients developed SMNs (11 solid, four hematologic). Median time from IMRT to solid SMN was 11.0 years (range: 6.8-19.2) with 10- and 15-year cumulative incidences 1.8% (95% CI: 0.7-3.9) and 3.5% (95% CI: 1.4-7.5), respectively; SIR was 13.7 (95% CI: 6.9-24.6) and EAR was 2.8 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 1.0-4.6). Eight solid SMNs developed within the IMRT field (100% IDL [n = 5], 80% IDL [n = 1], 50% IDL [n = 1], 40% IDL [n = 1]), one within the 70%-80% IDL of a conventional field, one was out-of-field, and one could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS With median follow-up of >10 years, many solid SMNs after IMRT in childhood cancer survivors develop in the high-dose region. These data serve as a foundation for comparison with other modalities of radiation treatment (e.g., proton therapy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dana L. Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina
| | - Gregory Niyazov
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Chaya Moskowitz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | - Suzanne L. Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lavery JA, Lepisto EM, Brown S, Rizvi H, McCarthy C, LeNoue-Newton M, Yu C, Lee J, Guo X, Yu T, Rudolph J, Sweeney S, Park BH, Warner JL, Bedard PL, Riely G, Schrag D, Panageas KS. A Scalable Quality Assurance Process for Curating Oncology Electronic Health Records: The Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative Approach. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2022; 6:e2100105. [PMID: 35192403 PMCID: PMC8863125 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The American Association for Cancer Research Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange Biopharma Collaborative is a multi-institution effort to build a pan-cancer repository of genomic and clinical data curated from the electronic health record. For the research community to be confident that data extracted from electronic health record text are reliable, transparency of the approach used to ensure data quality is essential. Transparent QA processes for GENIE BPC ensure that the data can be used to support advances in precision oncology OR @jessicalavs of @MSKBiostats & coauthors discuss @AACR Project GENIE BPC, a multi-institution effort to aggregate clinical plus genomic data for patients with cancer. Transparent QA processes for GENIE BPC ensure that the data can be used to support advances in precision oncology.![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eva M Lepisto
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA
| | | | - Hira Rizvi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Celeste Yu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - Jasme Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Julia Rudolph
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Shawn Sweeney
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Ben Ho Park
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Philippe L Bedard
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - Gregory Riely
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brown S, Lavery JA, Shen R, Martin AS, Kehl KL, Sweeney SM, Lepisto EM, Rizvi H, McCarthy CG, Schultz N, Warner JL, Park BH, Bedard PL, Riely GJ, Schrag D, Panageas KS. Implications of Selection Bias Due to Delayed Study Entry in Clinical Genomic Studies. JAMA Oncol 2021; 8:287-291. [PMID: 34734967 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Importance Real-world data sets that combine clinical and genomic data may be subject to left truncation (when potential study participants are not included because they have already passed the milestone of interest at the time of study recruitment). The lapse between diagnosis and molecular testing can present analytic challenges and threaten the validity and interpretation of survival analyses. Observations Effects of ignoring left truncation when estimating overall survival are illustrated using data from the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange Biopharma Collaborative (GENIE BPC), and a straightforward risk-set adjustment approach is described. Ignoring left truncation results in overestimation of overall survival: unadjusted median survival estimates from diagnosis among patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer or stage IV colorectal cancer were overestimated by more than 1 year. Conclusions and Relevance Clinicogenomic data are a valuable resource for evaluation of real-world cancer outcomes and should be analyzed using appropriate methods to maximize their potential. Analysts must become adept at application of appropriate statistical methods to ensure valid, meaningful, and generalizable research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Brown
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Ronglai Shen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Axel S Martin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth L Kehl
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shawn M Sweeney
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eva M Lepisto
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hira Rizvi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Ben Ho Park
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Thomas S, Lichtenberg T, Dang K, Fitzsimons M, Grossman RL, Kundra R, Lavery JA, Lenoue-Newton ML, Panageas KS, Sawyers C, Schultz ND, Sirintrapun SJ, Topaloglu U, Welch A, Yu T, Zehir A, Gardos S. Linked Entity Attribute Pair (LEAP): A Harmonization Framework for Data Pooling. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 4:691-699. [PMID: 32755461 PMCID: PMC7469618 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As data-sharing projects become increasingly frequent, so does the need to map data elements between multiple classification systems. A generic, robust, shareable architecture will result in increased efficiency and transparency of the mapping process, while upholding the integrity of the data. MATERIALS AND METHODS The American Association for Cancer Research’s Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) collects clinical and genomic data for precision cancer medicine. As part of its commitment to open science, GENIE has partnered with the National Cancer Institute’s Genomic Data Commons (GDC) as a secondary repository. After initial efforts to submit data from GENIE to GDC failed, we realized the need for a solution to allow for the iterative mapping of data elements between dynamic classification systems. We developed the Linked Entity Attribute Pair (LEAP) database framework to store and manage the term mappings used to submit data from GENIE to GDC. RESULTS After creating and populating the LEAP framework, we identified 195 mappings from GENIE to GDC requiring remediation and observed a 28% reduction in effort to resolve these issues, as well as a reduction in inadvertent errors. These results led to a decrease in the time to map between OncoTree, the cancer type ontology used by GENIE, and International Classification of Disease for Oncology, 3rd Edition, used by GDC, from several months to less than 1 week. CONCLUSION The LEAP framework provides a streamlined mapping process among various classification systems and allows for reusability so that efforts to create or adjust mappings are straightforward. The ability of the framework to track changes over time streamlines the process to map data elements across various dynamic classification systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Thomas
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Tara Lichtenberg
- Center for Translational Data Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Michael Fitzsimons
- Center for Translational Data Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.,University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert L Grossman
- Center for Translational Data Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ritika Kundra
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Katherine S Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Charles Sawyers
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nikolaus D Schultz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Umit Topaloglu
- Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Angelica Welch
- Information Systems, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Ahmet Zehir
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Stuart Gardos
- Information Systems, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kehl KL, Riely GJ, Lepisto EM, Lavery JA, Warner JL, LeNoue-Newton ML, Sweeney SM, Rudolph JE, Brown S, Yu C, Bedard PL, Schrag D, Panageas KS. Correlation Between Surrogate End Points and Overall Survival in a Multi-institutional Clinicogenomic Cohort of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung or Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2117547. [PMID: 34309669 PMCID: PMC8314138 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Contemporary observational cancer research requires associating genomic biomarkers with reproducible end points; overall survival (OS) is a key end point, but interpretation can be challenging when multiple lines of therapy and prolonged survival are common. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and time to next treatment (TTNT) are alternative end points, but their utility as surrogates for OS in real-world clinicogenomic data sets has not been well characterized. OBJECTIVE To measure correlations between candidate surrogate end points and OS in a multi-institutional clinicogenomic data set. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) whose tumors were genotyped at 4 academic centers from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2017, and who initiated systemic therapy for advanced disease. Patients were followed up through August 31, 2020 (NSCLC), and October 31, 2020 (CRC). Statistical analyses were conducted on January 5, 2021. EXPOSURES Candidate surrogate end points included TTD; TTNT; PFS based on imaging reports only; PFS based on medical oncologist ascertainment only; PFS based on either imaging or medical oncologist ascertainment, whichever came first; and PFS defined by a requirement that both imaging and medical oncologist ascertainment have indicated progression. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the correlation between candidate surrogate end points and OS. RESULTS There were 1161 patients with NSCLC (648 women [55.8%]; mean [SD] age, 63 [11] years) and 1150 with CRC (647 men [56.3%]; mean [SD] age, 54 [12] years) identified for analysis. Progression-free survival based on both imaging and medical oncologist documentation was most correlated with OS (NSCLC: ρ = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.73-0.79; CRC: ρ = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.75). Time to treatment discontinuation was least associated with OS (NSCLC: ρ = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.40-0.50; CRC: ρ = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.06-0.19). Time to next treatment was modestly associated with OS (NSCLC: ρ = 0.60; 0.55-0.64; CRC: ρ = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.32-0.46). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study suggests that PFS based on both a radiologist and a treating oncologist determining that a progression event has occurred was the surrogate end point most highly correlated with OS for analysis of observational clinicogenomic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth L. Kehl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gregory J. Riely
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eva M. Lepisto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeremy L. Warner
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Shawn M. Sweeney
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Julia E. Rudolph
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Samantha Brown
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Celeste Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philippe L. Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Associate Editor, JAMA
| | - Katherine S. Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Brown S, Lavery JA, Lepisto EM, McCarthy C, Rizvi H, Yu C, Kehl KL, Sweeney SM, Rudolph JE, Schultz N, Kundra R, Mastrogiacomo B, Bedard P, Warner JL, Riely GJ, Schrag D, Panageas KS. Abstract 2620: Ignoring left truncation in overall survival within real-world genomic-phenomic data leads to inflated survival estimates. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-2620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Studies linking genomic and phenomic data are subject to selection biases, including delayed entry or immortal time bias. Delayed entry can be problematic for time-to-event analyses, but utilization of appropriate statistical methods to account for delayed entry are underutilized. Delayed entry commonly occurs when genomic sequencing results are obtained after the start time for survival estimation.
To evaluate the impact of left truncation on overall survival (OS) estimates, we explored outcomes in patients with de novo stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) from the AACR GENIE Biopharma Collaborative, who had genomic sequencing within a specified timeframe. We analyzed OS from diagnosis and from start of the most common first-line regimen, carboplatin/pemetrexed for NSCLC (N = 212 patients) and FOLFOX for CRC (N = 369 patients). We compared median OS using standard Kaplan-Meier methods to median OS using left truncation methods to account for delayed entry. All NSCLC and CRC patients underwent genomic sequencing after their diagnosis date. Among NSCLC patients on carboplatin/pemetrexed, 41% and among CRC patients on FOLFOX, 14% had sequencing determined after starting first-line regimen. The survfit function in R package survival was used, and the absolute differences and percent differences in median OS estimates were calculated.
Failure to account for delayed entry leads to an overestimation of OS, regardless of cohort and start date. Adjusting survival outcomes using left truncation methods reduces the influence of some aspects of selection bias and results in better estimates of time to event outcomes. Analyses from these cohorts can provide meaningful insights about survival outcomes outside the clinical trial setting and may support trial design and reliable selection of control arms. As such, it is imperative that analytic methods to account for the inflated survival estimates are incorporated.
EstimateCRC Stage IV (N = 658)NSCLC Stage IV (N = 722)Unadjusted Median (IQR) Overall Survival from Diagnosis (Years)3.2 (2.9, 3.4)2.3 (2.0, 2.5)Median (IQR) Overall Survival from Diagnosis in Years, Adjusting for Delayed Entry2.1 (1.9, 2.4)1.3 (1.1, 1.6)Difference in Medians (Years)1.11.0% Difference in Medians34%44%EstimateCRC Stage IV (N = 369)NSCLC Stage IV (N = 212)Unadjusted Median (IQR) Overall Survival from Most Common First-Line Regimen (Years)2.9 (2.6, 3.4)1.3 (1.0, 1.6)Median (IQR) Overall Survival from Most Common First-Line Regimen in Years, Adjusting for Delayed Entry2.1 (1.8, 2.5)0.9 (0.7, 1.2)Difference in Medians (Years)0.80.4% Difference in Medians28%31%
Citation Format: Samantha Brown, Jessica A. Lavery, Eva M. Lepisto, Caroline McCarthy, Hira Rizvi, Celeste Yu, Kenneth L. Kehl, Shawn M. Sweeney, Julia E. Rudolph, Nikolaus Schultz, Ritika Kundra, Brooke Mastrogiacomo, Phillipe Bedard, Jeremy L. Warner, Gregory J. Riely, Deborah Schrag, Katherine S. Panageas, The AACR Project GENIE Consortium. Ignoring left truncation in overall survival within real-world genomic-phenomic data leads to inflated survival estimates [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2620.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Hira Rizvi
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Celeste Yu
- 3Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Ritika Kundra
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lavery JA, Brown S, Lepisto E, Lenoue-Newton ML, McCarthy C, Rizvi H, Yu C, Kehl KL, Sweeney SM, Rudolph JE, Schultz N, Mastrogiacomo B, Kundra R, Warner J, Bedard P, Riely GJ, Panageas KS, Schrag D. Abstract 2619: Defining real-world recurrence in the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative Data. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-2619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Obtaining information regarding cancer recurrence from a retrospective, EHR-based dataset poses several challenges primarily due to the lack of structured data. Patients are at risk for cancer recurrence beginning at a time point at which they are characterized as having no evidence of disease. The absence of cancer may be indicated on a radiology report or a medical oncologist assessment, requiring manual review and interpretation of potentially ambiguous free text. Further, the recurrence event itself can be defined based on several distinct data sources including pathology, imaging, clinician assessments, or tumor markers. The likelihood of ascertaining recurrence is dependent on the frequency and type of surveillance performed and varies based on tumor type and based on clinicians' thresholds for pursuing workup of borderline or suspicious findings; if follow up assessments are infrequent, there are fewer opportunities to detect recurrence. Given these challenges, there is currently no standardized approach to evaluating cancer recurrence in EHR data, impeding analyses of rare molecular tumor subtypes in multi-institutional linked clinico-genomic databases.
For this analysis, we leveraged the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative data based on the PRISSMM curation model to develop an algorithm for identifying recurrence among patients diagnosed with stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer or with stage I-III colorectal cancer. This algorithm involves using curated pathology report data to identify a definitive surgery as the time at which patients have completed curative intent treatment. Subsequent imaging reports, pathology reports, medical oncologist assessments and tumor marker data are then evaluated in order to characterize the timing of specific recurrence events.
We will present the real-world recurrence algorithm, its underlying rationale and discuss applications of recurrence endpoints. Beyond enabling estimates of recurrence-free survival, identifying cancer recurrence will allow for estimation of progression-free survival among stage I-III patients in addition to estimation of PFS among de novo stage IV patients. Estimating PFS in a large cohort of patients with linked phenomic and genomic data has historically been a limitation of these types of datasets. Overcoming this limitation will allow for precision medicine advances in oncology by facilitating data pooling across institutions and enabling examination of rare molecular subtypes in relation to clinically meaningful endpoints.
Citation Format: Jessica A. Lavery, Samantha Brown, Eva Lepisto, Michele L. Lenoue-Newton, Caroline McCarthy, Hira Rizvi, Celeste Yu, Kenneth L. Kehl, Shawn M. Sweeney, Julia E. Rudolph, Nikolaus Schultz, Brooke Mastrogiacomo, Ritika Kundra, Jeremy Warner, Philippe Bedard, Gregory J. Riely, Katherine S. Panageas, Deborah Schrag, AACR Project GENIE Consortium. Defining real-world recurrence in the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative Data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2619.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Hira Rizvi
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Celeste Yu
- 4Princess Margaret - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ritika Kundra
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Philippe Bedard
- 4Princess Margaret - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mamoor M, Postow MA, Lavery JA, Baxi SS, Khan N, Mao JJ, Rogak LJ, Sidlow R, Thom B, Wolchok JA, Korenstein D. Quality of life in long-term survivors of advanced melanoma treated with checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 8:jitc-2019-000260. [PMID: 32152222 PMCID: PMC7061889 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CIs) have revolutionized treatment of advanced melanoma, leading to an emerging population of long-term survivors. Survivors’ quality of life (QOL) and symptom burden are poorly understood. We set out to evaluate symptom burden and QOL in patients with advanced melanoma alive more than 1 year after initiating CI therapy. Methods Cross-sectional surveys, accompanied by chart review of patients with advanced melanoma treated with CIs at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, completed therapy, and were alive >1 year after treatment initiation. Surveys were administered between February and August 2018. Surveys included: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, EuroQOL, items from Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and Fatigue Severity Scale. Results We included 90 patients. The most common CI regimens were ipilimumab plus nivolumab (53%) and pembrolizumab (41%); most patients (71%) were not treated in clinical trials. Median time from CI therapy initiation was 40 months and from last dose was 28 months. Fatigue was reported by 28%, with higher fatigue scores in women than men; 12% reported difficulty sleeping. Aching joints (17%) and muscles (12%) were fairly common. Level of functioning was generally high. Overall QOL was excellent though 40% reported ‘some or moderate’ problems with anxiety/depression and 31% with pain/discomfort. Conclusions After CI therapy, long-surviving advanced melanoma patients commonly report fatigue but otherwise have moderate symptom burden and good QOL. Ensuring appropriate symptom management will optimize clinical outcomes for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha Mamoor
- Health Outcomes Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael A Postow
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Niloufer Khan
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jun J Mao
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lauren J Rogak
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert Sidlow
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bridgette Thom
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jedd A Wolchok
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Deborah Korenstein
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Herrero C, Lavery JA, Anoushiravani AA, Davidovitch RI. Real-Time Fluoroscopic Navigation Improves Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2021; 79:78-83. [PMID: 34081883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
We investigated whether a novel, real-time fluoroscopybased navigation system optimized component positioning and leg length in fluoroscopically aided direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (DAA-THA). We retrospectively reviewed 75 fluoroscopically assisted DAA-THA performed by a single surgeon: 37 procedures used the software intraoperatively to overlay anteversion, inclination, and leg length information over the existing fluoroscopic radiograph with the aim of enhancing component positioning. The control group consisted of 38 procedures from the single surgeon's patient pool who had undergone non-navigated fluoroscopic assisted DAA-THA 1 month prior to the system's trial. Our results demonstrate that the navigation group measurements were significantly closer to the target numbers with less variation. The mean difference from target value were as follows: for anteversion (control: -4.68°, navigated: -01.0°), inclination (control: -1.87°, navigated: 0.8°), and leg length discrepancy (control: -2.59°, navigated: -0.98°). In addition, surgical time was shorter in the navigation group (75.7 vs. 74 minutes; p = 0.001). The real-time feedback and calculations provided by the navigation software provided a reproducible precision for component positioning and leg length measurement during DAA-THA.
Collapse
|
28
|
Brown S, Lee J, Pillai A, Gandhi F, Bahadur N, Barton L, Chan K, Niederhausern A, Nichols C, Philip J, Regazzi AM, Shah NJ, Panageas K, Lavery JA. Real-time data quality assurance analysis for real-world, pan-cancer data. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e18775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e18775 Background: The production of high-quality real-world data requires comprehensive and meticulous data quality assurance (QA) methods to guarantee that adequate standards of accuracy, completeness, and consistency are met. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) synthesizes manually curated Electronic Health Record (EHR) data to collect and harmonize the fundamental data elements across all cancer types. Centralized real-time analysis of curated data quality can allow for rigorous review to identify areas of strength and opportunities for improvement in the curation process. Methods: MSKCC built the Core Clinical Data Element (CCDE) data model, which encompasses aspects of PRISSMM, ASCO’s mCODE, and NAACCR tumor registry frameworks, to capture standardized real-world, pan-cancer, pan-specialty data across 11 modules, including cancer genomics, imaging, pathology, surgery, and radiation. A key component within the QA process is source data verification (SDV), the comparison of curated data against source documents to identify inconsistencies. Any discrepancies detected are classified into major and minor violations. Major violations are errors or omissions on core data elements that would impact time interval calculations, such as an incorrect procedure date. Minor violations are errors or omissions on less critical data elements, such as a missing radiation therapy dose. Identifying these inconsistences allows the QA team to recognize patterns in curation errors and distinguish areas for curator retraining. Results: With limited functionality in basic standard data quality checks that exist across various data storage platforms, an interactive application was developed using the R Shiny package to access data as cases are recorded and summarize findings from SDV in real time. The app has two panels, each stratified by CCDE module. The first panel details the total number of forms curated and percentage of forms that underwent SDV, with each form representing one of the 11 modules. The other panel consists of a set of tables that summarize specific major and minor violations based on user selection of a denominator of either patients (e.g. how many patients had a violation on at least one imaging report) or forms (e.g. how many imaging reports had a violation). We will demonstrate the utility of the app and discuss benefits of real time evaluation in large-scale, real-world EHR curation efforts. Conclusions: We recommend automated, user-friendly tools to assess data quality of such efforts. With real-time analysis, the tool allows for ongoing and regular data checks, enabling clarification of directives and retraining of curators as necessary early in the curation process. As the data curation efforts expand to more cancer cohorts, the app examines data quality of each cohort to ensure consistent evaluation. This offers transparency of data quality to ensure usability in real-world data for rigorous research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jasme Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anjali Pillai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Fenil Gandhi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nadia Bahadur
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Laura Barton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kimberly Chan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - John Philip
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Neil J. Shah
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lavery JA, Brown S, Riely GJ, Bedard PL, Park BH, Warner JL, Kehl KL, Lepisto EM, Rizvi H, LeNoue-Newton M, McCarthy CG, Yu C, Kundra R, Mastrogiacomo B, Schultz N, Rudolph JE, Sweeney S, Schrag D, Panageas K. Pan-cancer evaluation of homologous repair deficiency somatic mutations and response to first-line anti-neoplastic therapy. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.10535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10535 Background: Homologous recombination is a major mechanism of defective DNA repair, but it remains uncertain whether homologous repair deficient (HRD) tumors have favorable prognosis or are more/less likely to respond to treatment than tumors lacking such mutations. Objective: To determine whether lung (NSCLC) and colorectal (CRC) HRD+ tumors have better survival or response to chemotherapy than HRD- tumors. Methods: Patients with de novo stage IV NSCLC or CRC who had next generation sequencing (NGS) between 2015-2018 from one of four cancer centers were identified. Records were curated using the PRISSMM framework to ascertain treatment, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival based on imaging (PFS-I) and oncologists’ notes (PFS-M). Each NSCLC or CRC tumor was categorized as HRD+ if NGS revealed an oncogenic/likely oncogenic mutation in: ATM, BAP1, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CHEK2, FAM175A, FANCA, FANCC, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51C, RTEL1, or MRE11A based on the OncoKB database. The tumor was categorized as HRD- if no oncogenic mutation in any of these genes was evident and HRD indeterminate (HRD?) if no mutation was identified but the panel did not include all genes. OS, PFS-I and PFS-M from start of first line therapy were reported by HRD status. The percentage with a good response to first line therapy (≥2x the median) and exceptional response (≥3x the median) was estimated for each endpoint. Results: For NSCLC 4% were HRD+, 59% HRD- and 37% HRD?. For CRC there were 5% HRD+, 60% HRD- and 35% HRD?. There were no significant differences for any survival endpoint between patients who were HRD+ vs HRD- in univariable analyses. The proportion of good and exceptional responders to first line systemic chemotherapy also did not vary by HRD status, though patients with HRD+ CRC were potentially more likely to be exceptional responders. Similarly, no differences between HRD+ and HRD- tumors were apparent for the subgroup receiving platinum containing therapy. Conclusions: NSCLC and CRC patients with somatic mutations in HRD oncogenic genes did not differ from patients lacking such a mutation with respect to OS or PFS. CRC patients with HRD+ tumors may be more likely to be exceptional responders, but sample sizes are limited. By May, the analysis will include breast and pancreatic cancer cases.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gregory J. Riely
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Ben Ho Park
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | - Hira Rizvi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Celeste Yu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ritika Kundra
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lavery JA, Callahan MK, Panageas KS. Apples and Oranges? Considerations for EHR-Based Analyses Aggregating Data From Interventional Clinical Trials and Point-of-Care Encounters in Oncology. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 5:21-23. [PMID: 33411618 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Margaret K Callahan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare retinal toxicity as measured by electroretinogram, ocular, and patient survival in retinoblastoma treated with intravitreal melphalan at two concentrations (25 vs. 30 µg). METHODS Single-center, retrospective analysis of retinoblastoma eyes receiving 25-µg or 30-µg intravitreal melphalan from September 2012 to January 2019. Ocular toxicity was measured by electroretinogram of evaluable injections in 449 injections in 136 eyes. A repeated-measures linear mixed model with a random intercept and slope was applied to account for repeated measures for each eye. RESULTS Average decline in electroretinogram after each additional injection was -4.9 µV (95% confidence interval -6.3 to -3.4); electroretinogram declined by -4.6 µV (95% confidence interval -7.0 to -2.2) after 25-µg injections and -5.2 µV (95% confidence interval -6.6 to -3.8) after 30-µg injections (P = 0.66). Injection at a new clock site hour was associated with a -3.91-µV lower average (95% confidence interval -7.8 to -0.04). CONCLUSION Electroretinogram-measured toxicity in retinoblastoma eyes treated with intravitreal injections was not found to be different across 25-µg and 30-µg injections. There were no cases of extraocular extension or metastatic deaths in our patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Liao
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY 10065
- Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Terry Hsieh
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY 10065
- Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Jasmine H. Francis
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY 10065
- Dept. of Ophthalmology, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY 10065
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Dept. of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY 10065
| | - Audrey Mauguen
- Dept. of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY 10065
| | - Scott E. Brodie
- Dept. of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, N.Y. 10017
| | - David H. Abramson
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY 10065
- Dept. of Ophthalmology, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY 10065
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ocampo JMF, Lavery JA, Huang Y, Paul D, Paniagua-Avila A, Punjani N. Student Perspectives From a COVID-19 Epicenter: Bridging Educational Training and Public Health Practice. Am J Public Health 2021; 111:71-73. [PMID: 33326283 PMCID: PMC7750612 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2020.306003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Michelle F Ocampo
- Joanne Michelle F. Ocampo is a doctorate of public health student with the Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Jessica A. Lavery is with the Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health. Yongmei Huang, Damemarie Paul, Alejandra Paniagua-Avila, and Nahid Punjani are with the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health. Nahid Punjani is also with the Department of Urology, Center for Male Reproductive Medicine and Microsurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Joanne Michelle F. Ocampo is a doctorate of public health student with the Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Jessica A. Lavery is with the Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health. Yongmei Huang, Damemarie Paul, Alejandra Paniagua-Avila, and Nahid Punjani are with the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health. Nahid Punjani is also with the Department of Urology, Center for Male Reproductive Medicine and Microsurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Yongmei Huang
- Joanne Michelle F. Ocampo is a doctorate of public health student with the Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Jessica A. Lavery is with the Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health. Yongmei Huang, Damemarie Paul, Alejandra Paniagua-Avila, and Nahid Punjani are with the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health. Nahid Punjani is also with the Department of Urology, Center for Male Reproductive Medicine and Microsurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Damemarie Paul
- Joanne Michelle F. Ocampo is a doctorate of public health student with the Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Jessica A. Lavery is with the Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health. Yongmei Huang, Damemarie Paul, Alejandra Paniagua-Avila, and Nahid Punjani are with the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health. Nahid Punjani is also with the Department of Urology, Center for Male Reproductive Medicine and Microsurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Alejandra Paniagua-Avila
- Joanne Michelle F. Ocampo is a doctorate of public health student with the Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Jessica A. Lavery is with the Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health. Yongmei Huang, Damemarie Paul, Alejandra Paniagua-Avila, and Nahid Punjani are with the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health. Nahid Punjani is also with the Department of Urology, Center for Male Reproductive Medicine and Microsurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Nahid Punjani
- Joanne Michelle F. Ocampo is a doctorate of public health student with the Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Jessica A. Lavery is with the Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health. Yongmei Huang, Damemarie Paul, Alejandra Paniagua-Avila, and Nahid Punjani are with the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health. Nahid Punjani is also with the Department of Urology, Center for Male Reproductive Medicine and Microsurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shah GL, DeWolf S, Lee YJ, Tamari R, Dahi PB, Lavery JA, Ruiz J, Devlin SM, Cho C, Peled JU, Politikos I, Scordo M, Babady NE, Jain T, Vardhana S, Daniyan A, Sauter CS, Barker JN, Giralt SA, Goss C, Maslak P, Hohl TM, Kamboj M, Ramanathan L, van den Brink MR, Papadopoulos E, Papanicolaou G, Perales MA. Favorable outcomes of COVID-19 in recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Invest 2020; 130:6656-6667. [PMID: 32897885 PMCID: PMC7685738 DOI: 10.1172/jci141777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDUnderstanding outcomes and immunologic characteristics of cellular therapy recipients with SARS-CoV-2 is critical to performing these potentially life-saving therapies in the COVID-19 era. In this study of recipients of allogeneic (Allo) and autologous (Auto) hematopoietic cell transplant and CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, we aimed to identify clinical variables associated with COVID-19 severity and assess lymphocyte populations.METHODSWe retrospectively investigated patients diagnosed between March 15, 2020, and May 7, 2020. In a subset of patients, lymphocyte immunophenotyping, quantitative real-time PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs, and SARS-CoV-2 antibody status were available.RESULTSWe identified 77 patients with SARS-CoV-2 who were recipients of cellular therapy (Allo, 35; Auto, 37; CAR T, 5; median time from cellular therapy, 782 days; IQR, 354-1611 days). Overall survival at 30 days was 78%. Clinical variables significantly associated with the composite endpoint of nonrebreather or higher oxygen requirement and death (n events = 25 of 77) included number of comorbidities (HR 5.41, P = 0.004), infiltrates (HR 3.08, P = 0.032), and neutropenia (HR 1.15, P = 0.04). Worsening graft-versus-host disease was not identified among Allo recipients. Immune profiling revealed reductions and rapid recovery in lymphocyte populations across lymphocyte subsets. Antibody responses were seen in a subset of patients.CONCLUSIONIn this series of Allo, Auto, and CAR T recipients, we report overall favorable clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19 without active malignancy and provide preliminary insights into the lymphocyte populations that are key for the antiviral response and immune reconstitution.FUNDINGNIH grant P01 CA23766 and NIH/National Cancer Institute grant P30 CA008748.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunjan L. Shah
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susan DeWolf
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yeon Joo Lee
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine
| | - Roni Tamari
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Parastoo B. Dahi
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Josel Ruiz
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Christina Cho
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan U. Peled
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ioannis Politikos
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Scordo
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - N. Esther Babady
- Clinical Microbiology Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine
| | - Tania Jain
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Santosha Vardhana
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Lymphoma Service and
| | - Anthony Daniyan
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Leukemia Service, Department of Medicine; and
| | - Craig S. Sauter
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Juliet N. Barker
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sergio A. Giralt
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Tobias M. Hohl
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine
| | - Mini Kamboj
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine
| | - Lakshmi Ramanathan
- Clinical Chemistry Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marcel R.M. van den Brink
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Esperanza Papadopoulos
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Genovefa Papanicolaou
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine
| | - Miguel-Angel Perales
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aviki EM, Lavery JA, Roche KL, Cowan R, Dessources K, Basaran D, Green AK, Aghajanian CA, O'Cearbhaill R, Jewell EL, Leitao MM, Gardner GJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Sabbatini P, Bach PB. Impact of provider volume on front-line chemotherapy guideline compliance and overall survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:418-425. [PMID: 32814642 PMCID: PMC8436488 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to evaluate whether provider volume or other factors are associated with chemotherapy guideline compliance in elderly patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS We queried the SEER-Medicare database for patients ≥66 years, diagnosed with FIGO stage II-IV EOC from 2004 to 2013 who underwent surgery and received chemotherapy within 7 months of diagnosis. We compared NCCN guideline compliance (6 cycles of platinum-based doublet) and chemotherapy-related toxicities across provider volume tertiles. Factors associated with guideline compliance and chemotherapy-related toxicities were assessed using logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was compared across volume tertiles and Cox proportional-hazards model was created to adjust for case-mix. RESULTS 1924 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of guideline compliance was 70.3% with a significant association between provider volume and compliance (64.5% for low-volume, 72.2% for medium-volume, 71.7% for high-volume, p = .02). In the multivariate model, treatment by low-volume providers and patient age ≥ 80 years were independently associated with worse chemotherapy-guideline compliance. In the survival analysis, there was a significant difference in median OS across provider volume tertiles with median survival of 32.8 months (95%CI 29.6, 36.4) low-volume, 41.9 months (95%CI 37.5, 46.7) medium-volume, 42.1 months (95%CI 38.8, 44.2) high-volume providers, respectively (p < .01). After adjusting for case-mix, low-volume providers were independently associated with higher rates of mortality (aHR 1.25, 95%CI: 1.08, 1.43). CONCLUSIONS In a modern cohort of elderly Medicare patients with advanced EOC, we found higher rates of non-compliant care and worse survival associated with treatment by low-volume Medicare providers. Urgent efforts are needed to address this volume-outcomes disparity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emeline M Aviki
- The Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- The Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Renee Cowan
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Kimberly Dessources
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Derman Basaran
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Angela K Green
- The Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Carol A Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Roisin O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Paul Sabbatini
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Peter B Bach
- The Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schoenfeld AJ, Bandlamudi C, Lavery JA, Montecalvo J, Namakydoust A, Rizvi H, Egger J, Concepcion CP, Paul S, Arcila ME, Daneshbod Y, Chang J, Sauter JL, Beras A, Ladanyi M, Jacks T, Rudin CM, Taylor BS, Donoghue MTA, Heller G, Hellmann MD, Rekhtman N, Riely GJ. The Genomic Landscape of SMARCA4 Alterations and Associations with Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:5701-5708. [PMID: 32709715 PMCID: PMC7641983 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE SMARCA4 mutations are among the most common recurrent alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the relationship to other genomic abnormalities and clinical impact has not been established. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN To characterize SMARCA4 alterations in NSCLC, we analyzed the genomic, protein expression, and clinical outcome data of patients with SMARCA4 alterations treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering. RESULTS In 4,813 tumors from patients with NSCLC, we identified 8% (n = 407) of patients with SMARCA4-mutant lung cancer. We describe two categories of SMARCA4 mutations: class 1 mutations (truncating mutations, fusions, and homozygous deletion) and class 2 mutations (missense mutations). Protein expression loss was associated with class 1 mutation (81% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Both classes of mutation co-occurred more frequently with KRAS, STK11, and KEAP1 mutations compared with SMARCA4 wild-type tumors (P < 0.001). In patients with metastatic NSCLC, SMARCA4 alterations were associated with shorter overall survival, with class 1 alterations associated with shortest survival times (P < 0.001). Conversely, we found that treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) was associated with improved outcomes in patients with SMARCA4-mutant tumors (P = 0.01), with class 1 mutations having the best response to ICIs (P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS SMARCA4 alterations can be divided into two clinically relevant genomic classes associated with differential protein expression as well as distinct prognostic and treatment implications. Both classes co-occur with KEAP1, STK11, and KRAS mutations, but individually represent independent predictors of poor prognosis. Despite association with poor outcomes, SMARCA4-mutant lung cancers may be more sensitive to immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J Schoenfeld
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Chai Bandlamudi
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joseph Montecalvo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Azadeh Namakydoust
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Hira Rizvi
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jacklynn Egger
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Carla P Concepcion
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Sonal Paul
- Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Maria E Arcila
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yahya Daneshbod
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jason Chang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer L Sauter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amanda Beras
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Tyler Jacks
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Charles M Rudin
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Barry S Taylor
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mark T A Donoghue
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Glenn Heller
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew D Hellmann
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Natasha Rekhtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Gregory J Riely
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Thom B, Mamoor M, Lavery JA, Baxi SS, Khan N, Rogak LJ, Sidlow R, Korenstein D. The experience of financial toxicity among advanced melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy. J Psychosoc Oncol 2020; 39:285-293. [PMID: 33103948 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1836547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To measure financial toxicity and explore its association with quality of life (QOL) in an emerging population of survivors: advanced melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy. Design Cross-sectional survey and medical record review. Sample 106 survivors (39% response). Median time since start of immunotherapy was 36.4 months (range: 14.2-133.9). Methods The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity measured financial toxicity, and the EORTC-QLQ30 assessed QOL and functioning across five domains. Data were collected online, by phone, or in clinic. Findings: Younger patients (<65 years) reported higher financial toxicity (p < .001) than older patients. Controlling for age, financial toxicity was correlated with QOL (p < .001), financial difficulties (p < .001), and EORTC-QLQ30 functioning subscales. Conclusions Given the demonstrated association between financial toxicity and QOL, our study highlights the importance of addressing financial toxicity, particularly among patients receiving high-cost treatments. Implications for Psychosocial Providers: Providers should educate patients and their caregivers about cost-management techniques, link them with available resources, and provide psychosocial counseling to alleviate related distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridgette Thom
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maha Mamoor
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shrujal S Baxi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Flatiron Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Niloufer Khan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauren J Rogak
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert Sidlow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Korenstein
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Daley RJ, Rajeeve S, Kabel CC, Pappacena JJ, Stump SE, Lavery JA, Tallman MS, Geyer MB, Park JH. Tolerability and toxicity of pegaspargase in adults 40 years and older with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2020; 62:176-184. [DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1824068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J. Daley
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sridevi Rajeeve
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine/Mount Sinai St. Luke’s-West Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charlene C. Kabel
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sarah E. Stump
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin S. Tallman
- Leukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark B. Geyer
- Leukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jae H. Park
- Leukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kriplani A, Lavery JA, Mishra A, Korenstein D, Lipitz-Snyderman AN, Boudreau DM, Moryl N, Gillespie EF, Salz T. Trends in chronic opioid therapy among survivors of head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2020; 43:223-228. [PMID: 32964530 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) have increased risk of opioid misuse. METHODS Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results-Medicare data, we matched adults ≥66 years diagnosed with HNC 2008-2015 with cancer-free controls. We computed odds ratios (OR) for receipt of chronic opioid therapy (COT, claims for ≥90 consecutive days) for HNC survivors compared to controls each year after matching through 2016. RESULTS The cohort of HNC survivors declined from 5107 in the first year after diagnosis to 604 in the sixth year after diagnosis. For 5 years, rates of COT among HNC survivors exceeded that of controls. Differences between survivors and controls declined each year (ORs: year 1, 4.36; year 2, 2.60; year 3, 2.18; year 4, 1.85; and year 5, 1.35; all P-values <.05). CONCLUSIONS Among older HNC survivors, cancer-associated opioid use in the first years after diagnosis suggests that the benefit of opioids must balance the risk of opioid misuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuja Kriplani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Akriti Mishra
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Denise M Boudreau
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Natalie Moryl
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Talya Salz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hsieh T, Liao A, Francis JH, Lavery JA, Mauguen A, Brodie SE, Abramson DH. Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of intravitreal melphalan formulations for retinoblastoma. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235016. [PMID: 32609726 PMCID: PMC7329086 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Intravitreal melphalan injections are commonly used in the treatment for intraocular retinoblastoma. This study compares retinal toxicity and ocular survival between two formulations, with and without propylene glycol (Alkeran vs. Evomela, respectively). Methods A retrospective cohort study of retinoblastoma patients who received intravitreal injections of Alkeran and Evomela at 30 μg from September 2012 to January 2019 at a single tertiary care center were enrolled. Retinal toxicity was measured using electroretinogram (ERG) and compared using a multivariate analysis of 338 injections in 101 eyes of 96 patients. Ocular survival of 163 eyes in 150 patients was compared across formulations using Cox proportional hazards model. Eyes were censored at the time a patient received a dose other than 30 μg. Results Overall, ERG decline (mean, 95% CI) for each injection was -5.58 μV (-7.17, -3.99). No significant differences in ERG decrement were found between Alkeran (with alcohol) -5.52uV (-6.99, -4.05). and Evomela (without alcohol) -5.65uV (-8.31 to -2.98) formulations (p = 0.93). Ocular survival at 24 months was 93.6% (95% CI 86.2, 97.1) with alcohol and 91.7% (95% CI 53.9, 98.8) without alcohol. The hazard ratio (HR) for without vs with alcohol was 0.50 (95% CI 0.06 to 4.07); no significant difference in ocular survival was found between formulations (p = 0.52) Conclusions and relevance No differences were found in retinal toxicity and ocular survival between 30 μg intravitreal injections of Alkeran or Evomela for intraocular retinoblastoma. Given the increased stability of Evomela, intravitreal treatment could be expanded to centers without the ability to supply Alkeran due to its shorter safety window; however, Alkeran is less expensive. For those with existing infrastructure, Alkeran is a comparable, cost-effective alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry Hsieh
- Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Albert Liao
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Jasmine H. Francis
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- Department of Ophthalmology, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Audrey Mauguen
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Scott E. Brodie
- Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - David H. Abramson
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- Department of Ophthalmology, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lavery JA, Panageas K, LeNoue-Newton M, Sweeney S, Sheffler-Collins S, Rudolph JE, Rizvi H, Schultz N, Lepisto EM, Kehl KL, Warner JL, Dang K, Phillip J, Park BH, Riely GJ, Schrag D. Progression-free survival estimates in non-small cell lung cancer when RECIST is unavailable: Project GENIE’s integration of genomic, therapeutic and phenomic data. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.9622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9622 Background: Molecular tumor profiling has become an integral component of oncology practice but linked genomic-phenomic data remain scarce. Recurrence, treatment response and progression are not structured consistently in medical records and this deficit has been a roadblock to discovery of biomarkers that are associated with favorable outcomes. Methods: The Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) consortium is an AACR sponsored project to link and share genomic and phenomic data to promote discovery in precision medicine. 3 cancer centers that routinely perform somatic tumor profiling for advanced cancers agreed to curate anti-neoplastic treatment exposures and outcomes including recurrence, progression, response and survival using a standard method. 6 cancer types (lung, colorectal, breast, prostate, pancreas and bladder) were selected and a REDCAP database captures anti-neoplastic treatments, and specific elements from pathology, radiology and oncology reports. Curators abstract data using data fields that rely on the PRISSMM standard. “Real world” progression free survival (PFS) was identified based on curation of: 1) the text of radiologists’ reports for CT, PET/CT, PET and MRI scans (PFSI) and 2) medical oncologists’ notes (PFSM). PFSI and PFSM were estimated from the start of 1st line anti-neoplastic systemic therapy until progression or death for all patients with molecularly characterized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results: Genomic sequencing was performed between 2015 and 2017 for 748 patients with NSCLC treated at three major cancer centers. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years (interquartile range 58, 73) and 43% were male. As shown in the table, when RECIST assessments are unavailable, estimates of PFS vary based on whether they are derived from radiologists’ or oncologists’ interpretations. Conclusions: Radiologists’ reports and oncologists’ reports provide different PFS estimates. Cohort studies should specify the method used to define “real world” endpoints. Project GENIE will have 1800 NSCLC patients with curated endpoints by the ASCO meeting. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hira Rizvi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Eva M. Lepisto
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Fort Washington, PA
| | | | | | | | - John Phillip
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ben Ho Park
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Gregory J. Riely
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Salz T, Lavery JA, Lipitz-Snyderman A, Boudreau D, Moryl N, Gillespie EF, Korenstein D. Chronic opioid therapy among a high-risk cancer survivor population. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e19107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e19107 Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors are at increased risk of opioid dependence, due to exposure to opioids during treatment, history of tobacco and alcohol use, and substantial pain after treatment. Chronic opioid therapy (COT) is a risk factor for dependence, and rates of COT vary widely between populations of cancer survivors. We hypothesized that COT use is greater among HNC survivors than among those who never had cancer. Methods: We used SEER-Medicare to identify adults ≥66 years diagnosed with HNC between 2008 and 2015. HNC survivors were matched 1:3 at date of diagnosis on age, sex, comorbidity, and region with cancer-free controls. Survivors and controls had complete coverage with fee-for-service Medicare Parts A, B, and D for each year after matching. Survivors and controls with no COT in the year prior to matching date and were followed for COT use through 2016. The presence of claims for opioid dispensings over ≥90 consecutive days (COT) was calculated for each year after cancer diagnosis among survivors alive at the start of each year and for controls. We computed odds ratios (OR) for COT use for HNC survivors compared to matched controls in each year after matching date, using a hierarchical logistic regression model accounting for matching and repeated measurements across years. Results: The population of HNC survivors declined from 5,107 in the year after diagnosis to 604 in Year 6. Among HNC survivors, COT use remained relatively steady each year after diagnosis. (Table). For the first 5 years after matching date, rates of COT among HNC survivors exceeded that of controls, with the difference between survivors and controls declining each year (OR 4.36 for Year 1, OR 2.60 for Year 2, OR 2.18 for Year 3, OR 1.85 for Year 4, and OR 1.35 for Year 5, all p-values < 0.05). By Year 6, rates of COT use did not differ between HNC cases and controls. Conclusions: In the first year after diagnosis, HNC survivors have more than 4 times the odds of COT use compared to cancer-free controls. Cancer-associated COT use declines over time. Strategies for appropriate pain management for HNC survivors should balance the risk of opioid dependence, particularly in the early years after diagnosis, with the benefit of improved comfort and function. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talya Salz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Natalie Moryl
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
e14038 Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) offer insight into patient perception of health and symptom burden. Despite a shift toward electronic PRO (ePRO), optimal administration methods are unclear. Our institution recently began ePRO collection in survivorship clinics: patients are invited via email to complete a health survey on our online patient portal prior to annual visits, enabling clinician review of symptoms in advance of the visit. Patients who do not complete an ePRO survey at home are offered an iPad or paper survey at visit check-in. In the first year of ePRO, 87 patients inadvertently submitted multiple responses to the questionnaire, across two modalities. This study aimed to 1) assess determinants of ePRO completion across modalities (portal, iPad, paper); and, 2) among patients who submitted multiple surveys, compare consistency of responses in surveys completed within 30 days of each other. Methods: We reviewed records for 10194 patients seen in breast, thoracic, colorectal, and gynecologic survivorship clinics over one year. Demographics, disease/treatment details, and PRO responses (symptoms, health behaviors, etc.) were extracted. For aim 1, we used multivariate regression to determine predictors of completion method. For aim 2, we calculated Cohen’s kappa coefficients to compare responses based on completion modality. Results: Most patients (65.6%) completed the survey on an iPad in clinic; 16.7% on the portal, 17.7% on paper in clinic. Younger age (p < .001), white race (p < .001), less fatigue (p = .01), and English as primary language (p < .001) were associated with portal use in multivariate analyses. In general, Cohen’s Kappa analyses revealed high agreement between surveys. Conclusions: Our findings highlight demographic gaps in ePRO acceptance. Although most patients completed an ePRO (portal or iPad), few completed it at home in advance of their visit, which has implications for clinic flow and clinician preparation for visits. However, our finding of consistent symptom reporting across mode and location of completion is reassuring. Future work should seek to improve comfort with ePRO completion at home among groups less likely to accept it and explore the implications of symptom burden on ePRO acceptance.
Collapse
|
43
|
Lavery JA, Lipitz-Snyderman A, Li DG, Bach PB, Panageas KS. Assessing whether cancer stage is needed to evaluate measures of hospital surgical performance. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:66-71. [PMID: 31069903 PMCID: PMC6842027 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
RATIONAL, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES While public reports of hospital-level surgical quality measures are becoming increasingly common in health care, a comprehensive national assessment of surgical quality across multiple cancer sites has yet to be developed. Fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare claims present a potential resource from which to measure outcomes following cancer surgery given the national scope of patients and providers. However, due to the administrative nature of the data, clinical cancer information such as stage is not recorded. Leveraging the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry linked to FFS Medicare claims to analyse outcomes for patients whom we ultimately know stage information, we determined whether Medicare claims are suitable for measuring provider quality following cancer surgery by assessing the extent to which the lack of stage information modifies assessments of provider performance. METHODS We identified patients aged 66 and older undergoing cancer surgery between 2011 and 2013 from SEER-Medicare. We compared the changes in the risk-standardized rates (RSRs), decile rankings, and c-statistics with and without risk adjustment for cancer stage for three measures of hospital performance: 30-day mortality, surgical complications, and unplanned readmissions. RESULTS The RSR changed by at most 11.4% for mortality and by less than 4% for complications and readmissions, indicating that measures of hospital performance were stable with and without adjustment for stage. The relative performance of hospitals was also stable, as demonstrated by fewer than 20% of hospitals changing decile rank. The c-statistic declined by less than 2% across all measures, indicating that model fit was not substantially worsened without this information. CONCLUSION These findings support the use of FFS Medicare claims for hospital-level analyses of short-term outcomes following cancer surgery. Quality reporting based on these analyses can be used to help patients choose among hospitals and for evaluating policies to improve surgical cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Lavery
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Allison Lipitz-Snyderman
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Diane G Li
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Peter B Bach
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lipitz-Snyderman A, Lavery JA, Bach PB, Li DG, Yang A, Strong VE, Russo A, Panageas KS. Assessment of variation in 30-day mortality following cancer surgeries among older adults across US hospitals. Cancer Med 2020; 9:1648-1660. [PMID: 31918457 PMCID: PMC7050094 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While public reporting of surgical outcomes for noncancer conditions is common, cancer surgeries have generally been excluded. This is true despite numerous studies showing outcomes to differ between hospitals based on their characteristics. Our objective was to assess whether three prerequisites for quality assessment and reporting are present for 30‐day mortality after cancer surgery: low burden for timely reporting, hospital variation, and potential for public health gains. Study Design We used Fee‐for‐Service (FFS) Medicare claims to examine the extent of variation in 30‐day cancer surgical mortality between 3860 US hospitals. We included 340 489 surgeries for 12 cancer types for FFS Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥66 years, 2011‐2013. Hierarchical mixed‐effects logistic regression models adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics and with a random hospital effect were fit to obtain hospital‐specific risk‐standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) and 99% confidence intervals (CI). We calculated a hospital odds ratio to describe the difference in mortality risk for a hospital above vs below average quality and estimated the potential mortality reduction. Results The median number of cancer surgeries per hospital was 34. The median RSMR overall was 2.41% (99% CI 2.28%, 2.66%). In aggregate and for most cancers, variation between hospitals exceeded that due to differences in patient and hospital characteristics. For individual cancers, relative differences exceeded 20% in mortality risk between patients undergoing surgery at a hospital below vs above average quality, with the potential for an estimated 500 deaths prevented annually given hypothetical improvements. Conclusion Quality measurement and reporting of 30‐day mortality for cancer surgery is worthy of consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Lipitz-Snyderman
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter B Bach
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diane G Li
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Annie Yang
- Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vivian E Strong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashley Russo
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Klifto CS, Lavery JA, Gold HT, Milone MT, Karia R, Palusci V, Chu A. Pediatric Fingertip Injuries: Association With Child Abuse. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online 2020; 2:31-34. [PMID: 35415471 PMCID: PMC8991547 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2019.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methods Results Conclusions Type of study/level of evidence
Collapse
|
46
|
Goffman D, Ananth CV, Fleischer A, D'Alton M, Lavery JA, Smiley R, Zielinski K, Chazotte C. The New York State Safe Motherhood Initiative: Early Impact of Obstetric Hemorrhage Bundle Implementation. Am J Perinatol 2019; 36:1344-1350. [PMID: 30609429 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of the Safe Motherhood Initiative's (SMI) obstetric hemorrhage bundle in New York State (NYS). STUDY DESIGN In 2013, the SMI convened interprofessional workgroups on hemorrhage, venous thromboembolism, and hypertension tasked with developing evidence-based care bundles. Participating hospitals submitted data measured before, during, and after implementation of the hemorrhage bundle: maternal mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, cardiovascular collapse, hysterectomy, and transfusion of ≥4 units of red blood cells (RBCs). Data were analyzed for trends stratified by implementation status. RESULTS Of the 123 maternity hospitals in NYS, 117 participated, of which 113 submitted data. Of 250,719 births, transfusion of ≥4 units RBCs (1.8 per 1,000) and ICU admissions (1.1 per 1,000) were the most common morbidities. Four hemorrhage-related maternal deaths (1.6 per 100,000) and 10 cases of cardiovascular collapse requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (4.0 per 100,000) occurred. Hemorrhage morbidity did not change over the five quarters studied. Risks were similar across hospital level of care and implementation status. CONCLUSION Statewide implementation of bundles is feasible with resources critical to success. The low hemorrhage-related maternal death rate makes changes in mortality risk difficult to detect over short time intervals. Long-term and timely data collection with individual expert case review will be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dena Goffman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Cande V Ananth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Adiel Fleischer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Mary D'Alton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard Smiley
- Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Kristin Zielinski
- The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), District II, Albany, New York
| | - Cynthia Chazotte
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ganesh K, Wu C, O'Rourke KP, Szeglin BC, Zheng Y, Sauvé CEG, Adileh M, Wasserman I, Marco MR, Kim AS, Shady M, Sanchez-Vega F, Karthaus WR, Won HH, Choi SH, Pelossof R, Barlas A, Ntiamoah P, Pappou E, Elghouayel A, Strong JS, Chen CT, Harris JW, Weiser MR, Nash GM, Guillem JG, Wei IH, Kolesnick RN, Veeraraghavan H, Ortiz EJ, Petkovska I, Cercek A, Manova-Todorova KO, Saltz LB, Lavery JA, DeMatteo RP, Massagué J, Paty PB, Yaeger R, Chen X, Patil S, Clevers H, Berger MF, Lowe SW, Shia J, Romesser PB, Dow LE, Garcia-Aguilar J, Sawyers CL, Smith JJ. A rectal cancer organoid platform to study individual responses to chemoradiation. Nat Med 2019; 25:1607-1614. [PMID: 31591597 PMCID: PMC7385919 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0584-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 278] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Rectal cancer (RC) is a challenging disease to treat that requires chemotherapy, radiation and surgery to optimize outcomes for individual patients. No accurate model of RC exists to answer fundamental research questions relevant to patients. We established a biorepository of 65 patient-derived RC organoid cultures (tumoroids) from patients with primary, metastatic or recurrent disease. RC tumoroids retained molecular features of the tumors from which they were derived, and their ex vivo responses to clinically relevant chemotherapy and radiation treatment correlated with the clinical responses noted in individual patients' tumors. Upon engraftment into murine rectal mucosa, human RC tumoroids gave rise to invasive RC followed by metastasis to lung and liver. Importantly, engrafted tumors displayed the heterogenous sensitivity to chemotherapy observed clinically. Thus, the biology and drug sensitivity of RC clinical isolates can be efficiently interrogated using an organoid-based, ex vivo platform coupled with in vivo endoluminal propagation in animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karuna Ganesh
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chao Wu
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin P O'Rourke
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine/Rockefeller University/Sloan Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bryan C Szeglin
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Youyun Zheng
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mohammad Adileh
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Isaac Wasserman
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael R Marco
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amanda S Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maha Shady
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francisco Sanchez-Vega
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Computational Oncology Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wouter R Karthaus
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helen H Won
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Seo-Hyun Choi
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Raphael Pelossof
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Afsar Barlas
- Molecular Cytology Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmanouil Pappou
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arthur Elghouayel
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James S Strong
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chin-Tung Chen
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer W Harris
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jose G Guillem
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iris H Wei
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard N Kolesnick
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Harini Veeraraghavan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eduardo J Ortiz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Leonard B Saltz
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald P DeMatteo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joan Massagué
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip B Paty
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Sylvestor Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sujata Patil
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hans Clevers
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, University of Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott W Lowe
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Gastrointestinal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lukas E Dow
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry, Weill Cornell Medicine, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles L Sawyers
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Slover J, Lavery JA, Toombs C, Bosco JA, Gold HT. Factors Associated with Utilizing the Same Hospital for Subsequent Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Osteoarthritis Patients. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2019; 77:164-170. [PMID: 31487480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the factors that drive hospital-switching behavior of patients when they seek a second total joint arthroplasty (TJA) surgery. METHODS We analyzed the population-based, all-payer California Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) data for a cohort undergoing sequential TJAs for osteoarthritis (N = 48,800) from 2006 to 2011, excluding TJA for fracture. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with returning to the same hospital for each surgery, including rural or urban, surgery sequence and timing, Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index, age, sex, race and ethnicity, and insurance. RESULTS Overall, 15.1% of subjects (7,364/48,000) utilized a different hospital for their second surgery. Increasing years between TJAs was associated with decreasing odds of going to the same hospital for the second TJA (p < 0.05). Subjects switching from private insurance to Medicare between surgeries were much less likely to return to same hospital (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.47-0.59), as were those with alternate-joint sequencing (e.g., hip-knee). Those with Medicaid were somewhat less likely to return for the second surgery (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75-1.01). Urban and rural residents were equally likely to return to the same hospital (p > 0.05). Increasing age was associated with increasing likelihood of returning to the same hospital [e.g., ages 75- 79, OR: 1.36 (95% CI: 1.19-1.56) and ages 80+, OR: 1.41 (95% CI: 1.22-1.63)]. CONCLUSION Fifteen percent of patients switched hospitals for their second TJA within the 6-year study period. Those with Medicare or who had surgery on the alternate joint for second surgery were more likely to switch hospitals as were those who waited longer between surgeries and those living in a rural environment.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Age Factors
- Aged
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data
- Female
- Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
- Humans
- Male
- Medicare/statistics & numerical data
- Middle Aged
- Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery
- Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery
- Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data
- Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data
- Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data
- Residence Characteristics
- Sex Factors
- United States
Collapse
|
49
|
Lipitz-Snyderman A, Lavery JA, Bach P, Li DG, Yang A, Strong VE, Russo A, Panageas K. Opportunity for performance measurement: 30-day mortality following cancer surgeries across U.S. hospitals. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e18221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e18221 Background: While public reporting of surgical outcomes for non-cancer conditions is common, measures of outcomes following surgery for cancer have generally been excluded. This is true even though numerous studies show large variations between hospitals. We assessed whether prerequisites for quality reporting are present for the measure of 30-day cancer surgical mortality: low burden for timely reporting, hospital variation, and potential for public health gains. Methods: We used Fee-for-Service (FFS) Medicare claims to examine the extent of variation in 30-day mortality between 3,860 U.S. hospitals performing cancer surgery for patients ≥66 years, 2011-2013. Hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics and with a random hospital effect were fit to obtain hospital-specific risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) and 99% confidence intervals (CI). From these models we calculated a hospital odds ratio to describe the difference in the mortality risk for a hospital above versus below average quality and estimated the potential reduction in mortality under a scenario of improved quality for the lowest performers. Outcomes included extent of hospital variability in 30-day mortality after cancer surgery; and impact on lives saved from improving performance at outlier hospitals. Results: Over the three-year observation period, the median number of cancer surgeries performed per hospital was 34. For individual cancer sites, it was < 10, except for breast (median 17) and colorectal (median 14). The median RSMR overall was 2.41% (99% CI 2.28%, 2.66%). Breast had the lowest RSMR (median 0.24%) and gastroesophageal the highest (median 5.72%). In aggregate and for most individual cancers, variation between hospitals exceeded that due to differences in patient and hospital characteristics, and was robust to excluding emergent cases. For individual cancer sites, relative differences exceeded 20% in the risk of 30-day mortality between patients undergoing surgery at a hospital below average quality versus above average quality, with the potential for an estimated 500 deaths prevented annually given hypothetical improvements. Conclusions: Quality measurement and reporting of 30-day mortality for cancer surgery is worthy of consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Peter Bach
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Diane G. Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Ashley Russo
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worchester, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mamoor M, Lavery JA, Sidlow R, Rogak LJ, Thom B, Khan N, Baxi SS, Wolchok JD, Postow MA, Korenstein D. Long-term symptom burden and quality of life in metastatic melanoma patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e23090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e23090 Background: Patients with metastatic melanoma (MMel) who achieve durable long-term responses to checkpoint inhibitors (CI) represent a new type of cancer survivor, but their long-term quality of life (QOL) is poorly described. We measured symptom burden and long-term QOL in MMel patients treated with CIs at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK). Methods: Between February and August 2018 we performed a cross-sectional survey of adult patients with MMel treated with CI at MSK beginning at least 12 months prior to this study. Surveys were self-administered online using RedCap. We assessed patient treatment experience and QOL using the PRO-CTCAE bank, EORTC, EQ-5D, and Fatigue Severity Scale. We performed chart abstraction to assess extent of cancer burden, ECOG status, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), concurrent medical conditions, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) developing during or after treatment. For analysis, we dichotomized age (< 65 vs ≥65) and months from CI initiation (< 25 vs ≥25). Results: We enrolled 107 patients (39% survey response rate); 106 completed surveys. Participants were 57.0% male and 93.5% white, with median age 60.5 years (IQR: 51.1, 67.5 years). 79.4% had a CCI of 0 at start of CI; preexisting autoimmune disorders were rare. Median time since CI initiation was 36.4 months (range: 14.2, 133.9 months). Median length of CI treatment was 7.3 months (IQR: 2.1, 24.3 months); 15 patients were on treatment at the time of survey completion. Among those off treatment at the time of survey completion, median time off treatment was 27.1 months (IQR: 16.7, 40.4 months). The most common irAEs were rash (34.6%), colitis (24.3%), thyroiditis (19.6%), hepatitis (18.7%), and hypophysitis (13.1%). irAEs did not differ by age. Few patients reported symptoms at time of survey, most commonly aching joints (18%), fatigue (14%), aching muscles (13%), and difficulty sleeping (11%). Few (< 12%) had difficulty with physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning and almost none (1%) reported anxiety, depression or pain on the EQ-5D. QOL was excellent, with a median of 83.3% on the EQ-5D global health score and no differences based on toxicities or time from treatment. Conclusions: Long-term survivors of MMel patients report few burdensome symptoms after CI therapy and have excellent QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha Mamoor
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Robert Sidlow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|