A prospective study on the prevalence of NAFLD, advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in people with type 2 diabetes

Noninvasive diagnosis of interstitial fibrosis in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Researchers have delved into noninvasive diagnostic methods of renal fibrosis (RF) in chronic kidney disease, including ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and radiomics. However, the value of these diagnostic methods in the noninvasive diagnosis of RF remains contentious. Consequently, the present study aimed to systematically delineate the accuracy of the noninvasive diagnosis of RF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search covering PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for all data available up to 28 July 2023 was conducted for eligible studies.

RESULTS

We included 21 studies covering 4885 participants. Among them, nine studies utilized US as a noninvasive diagnostic method, eight studies used MRI, and four articles employed radiomics. The sensitivity and specificity of US for detecting RF were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.84). The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.83) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.96). The sensitivity and specificity of radiomics were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.59-0.77) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

The current early noninvasive diagnostic methods for RF include US, MRI, and radiomics. However, this study demonstrates that US has a higher sensitivity for the detection of RF compared to MRI. Compared to US, radiomics studies based on US did not show superior advantages. Therefore, challenges still exist in the current radiomics approaches for diagnosing RF, and further exploration of optimized artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and technologies is needed.

Editorial: Genetics for non-invasive risk stratification-Finding the needle in the haystack? Authors' reply

This article is linked to Bridi et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18099 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18123

The impact of genetic risk on the prevalence of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in prospectively assessed patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Genetic factors contribute to the risk and severity of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, the utility of genetic testing in risk stratification remains poorly characterised.

AIMS

To examine the influence of genetic risk on advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the utility of a polygenic risk score (PRS) in screening guidelines.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled adults aged ≥50 years with T2DM recruited from clinics. PRS was the sum of risk alleles in PNPLA3, TM6SF2 and SERPINA1 minus the protective variant in HSD17B13. We performed magnetic resonance elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastography to assess for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.

RESULTS

Of 382 included patients, the mean age and BMI were 64.8 (±8.4) years and 31.7 (±6.2) kg/m2 respectively. The prevalence of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 12.3% and 5.2% respectively; higher PRS was associated with increased risk of cirrhosis (2.7% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.037). High PRS was associated with increased risk of advanced fibrosis among those with fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) index <1.3 (9.6% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.036) but was not significantly different in other FIB-4 categories. Incorporating PRS determination into the American Gastroenterological Association and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases screening guidelines prevented approximately 20% of all participants with advanced fibrosis from being inappropriately classified as low risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilising a well-phenotyped, prospective cohort of adults with T2DM, we found that adding an assessment of genetic risk to recommendations to screen at-risk populations may improve risk prediction.

Epidemiology and diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

The most common chronic liver illness worldwide is metabolic dysfunction linked to fatty liver disease (MAFLD), which is poorly understood by doctors and patients. Many people with this disease develop steatohepatitis, cirrhosis and its consequences, as well as extrahepatic manifestations; these conditions are particularly common if they are linked to diabetes mellitus or obesity. A breakthrough with numerous benefits is the switch from NAFLD to MAFLD in terms of terminology and methodology. The diagnosis of MAFLD is based on affirmative criteria; unlike NAFLD, it is no longer based on exclusion. The diagnosis of MAFLD and the evaluation of steatosis and fibrosis is achieved using liver biopsy and non-invasive laboratory or radiographic techniques. We briefly address the most recent developments in MAFLD epidemiology and diagnosis.

The Janus of a disease: Diabetes and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Diabetes Mellitus are two prevalent metabolic disorders that often coexist and synergistically contribute to the progression of each other. Several pathophysiological pathways are involved in the association, including insulin resistance, inflammation, and lipotoxicity, providing a foundation for understanding the complex interrelationships between these conditions. The presence of MASLD has a significant impact on diabetes risk and the development of microvascular and macrovascular complications, and diabetes significantly contributes to an increased risk of liver fibrosis progression in MASLD and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover, both pathologies have a synergistic effect on cardiovascular events and mortality. Therapeutic interventions targeting MASLD and diabetes are discussed, considering lifestyle modifications, pharmacological agents, and emerging treatment modalities. The review also addresses the challenges in managing these comorbidities, such as the need for personalized approaches and the potential impact on cardiovascular health. The insights gleaned from this analysis can inform clinicians, researchers, and policymakers in developing integrated strategies for preventing, diagnosing, and managing these metabolic disorders.

Liver tissue lipids in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease with diabetes and obesity

BACKGROUND

Diabetes and obesity are associated with altered lipid metabolism and hepatic steatosis. Studies suggest that increases in lipid accumulation in these patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are not uniform for all lipid components. This study evaluates this variation.

METHODS

A comprehensive lipidomic analysis of different lipid groups, were performed on liver tissue and plasma samples obtained at the time of histology from a well-defined cohort of 72 MASLD participants. The lipid profiles of controls were compared to those of MASLD patients with obesity, diabetes, or a combination of both.

RESULTS

MASLD patients without obesity or diabetes exhibited distinct changes in the lipid profile of their liver tissue. The presence of diabetes or obesity further modified these lipid profiles (e.g., ceramide 47:7;4O), with positive or negative correlation (p < 0.05). A step-wise increase (long-chain fatty acids, triglycerides, and ceramides) or decrease (ultra-long fatty acids, diglycerides, and phospholipids) for lipid groups was observed compared to control among patients with MASLD without obesity or diabetes to MASLD patients with obesity as a single risk factor, and MASLD patients with obesity and diabetes. Changes in lipids observed in the plasma did not align with their corresponding liver tissue findings.

CONCLUSION

The changes observed in the composition of lipids are not similar in patients with obesity and diabetes among those with MASLD. This highlights the different metabolic processes at play. The presence of obesity or diabetes in patients with MASLD exacerbates these lipid derangements, underscoring the potential for targeted intervention in MASLD patients.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: Emerging evidence of benefit of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors agonists and incretin-based therapies

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global epidemic, affecting more than half of the people living with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The relationship between NAFLD and T2D is bidirectional and the presence of one perpetuates the other, which significantly increases the hepatic as well as extrahepatic complications. Until recently, there was no approved pharmacological treatment for NAFLD/ nonalcoholic steatohepatitits (NASH). However, there is evidence that drugs used for diabetes may have beneficial effects on NAFLD. Insulin sensitizers acting through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) modulation act on multiple levels of NAFLD pathogenesis. Pioglitazone (PPARγ agonist) and saroglitazar (PPARα/γ agonist) are particularly beneficial and recommended by several authoritative bodies for treating NAFLD in T2D, although data on biopsy-proven NASH are lacking with the latter. Initial data on elafibanor (PPAR α/δ agonist) and Lanifibranor (pan PPAR agonist) are promising. On the other hand, incretin therapies based on glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dual- and triple-hormone receptor co-agonists reported impressive weight loss and may have anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties. GLP-1 RAs have shown beneficial effects on NAFLD/NASH and more studies on potential direct effects on liver function by dual- and triple-agonists are required. Furthermore, the long-term safety of these therapies in NAFLD needs to be established. Collaborative efforts among healthcare providers such as primary care doctors, hepatologists, and endocrinologists are warranted for selecting patients for the best possible management of NAFLD in T2D.

MASH as an emerging cause of hepatocellular carcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the deadliest and fastest-growing cancers. Among HCC etiologies, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has served as a major HCC driver due to its great potential for increasing cirrhosis. The obesogenic environment fosters a positive energy balance and results in a continuous rise of obesity and metabolic syndrome. However, it is difficult to understand how metabolic complications lead to the poor prognosis of liver diseases and which molecular mechanisms are underpinning MAFLD-driven HCC development. Thus, suitable preclinical models that recapitulate human etiologies are essentially required. Numerous preclinical models have been created but not many mimicked anthropometric measures and the course of disease progression shown in the patients. Here we review the literature on adipose tissues, liver-related HCC etiologies and recently discovered genetic mutation signatures found in MAFLD-driven HCC patients. We also critically review current rodent models suggested for MAFLD-driven HCC study.

EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), previously termed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is defined as steatotic liver disease (SLD) in the presence of one or more cardiometabolic risk factor(s) and the absence of harmful alcohol intake. The spectrum of MASLD includes steatosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, previously NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis and MASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This joint EASL-EASD-EASO guideline provides an update on definitions, prevention, screening, diagnosis and treatment for MASLD. Case-finding strategies for MASLD with liver fibrosis, using non-invasive tests, should be applied in individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors, abnormal liver enzymes, and/or radiological signs of hepatic steatosis, particularly in the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) or obesity with additional metabolic risk factor(s). A stepwise approach using blood-based scores (such as FIB-4) and, sequentially, imaging techniques (such as transient elastography) is suitable to rule-out/in advanced fibrosis, which is predictive of liver-related outcomes. In adults with MASLD, lifestyle modification - including weight loss, dietary changes, physical exercise and discouraging alcohol consumption - as well as optimal management of comorbidities - including use of incretin-based therapies (e.g. semaglutide, tirzepatide) for T2D or obesity, if indicated - is advised. Bariatric surgery is also an option in individuals with MASLD and obesity. If locally approved and dependent on the label, adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and significant liver fibrosis (stage ≥2) should be considered for a MASH-targeted treatment with resmetirom, which demonstrated histological effectiveness on steatohepatitis and fibrosis with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. No MASH-targeted pharmacotherapy can currently be recommended for the cirrhotic stage. Management of MASH-related cirrhosis includes adaptations of metabolic drugs, nutritional counselling, surveillance for portal hypertension and HCC, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), previously termed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is defined as steatotic liver disease (SLD) in the presence of one or more cardiometabolic risk factor(s) and the absence of harmful alcohol intake. The spectrum of MASLD includes steatosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, previously NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis and MASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This joint EASL-EASD-EASO guideline provides an update on definitions, prevention, screening, diagnosis and treatment for MASLD. Case-finding strategies for MASLD with liver fibrosis, using non-invasive tests, should be applied in individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors, abnormal liver enzymes, and/or radiological signs of hepatic steatosis, particularly in the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) or obesity with additional metabolic risk factor(s). A stepwise approach using blood-based scores (such as FIB-4) and, sequentially, imaging techniques (such as transient elastography) is suitable to rule-out/in advanced fibrosis, which is predictive of liver-related outcomes. In adults with MASLD, lifestyle modification - including weight loss, dietary changes, physical exercise and discouraging alcohol consumption - as well as optimal management of comorbidities - including use of incretin-based therapies (e.g. semaglutide, tirzepatide) for T2D or obesity, if indicated - is advised. Bariatric surgery is also an option in individuals with MASLD and obesity. If locally approved and dependent on the label, adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and significant liver fibrosis (stage ≥2) should be considered for a MASH-targeted treatment with resmetirom, which demonstrated histological effectiveness on steatohepatitis and fibrosis with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. No MASH-targeted pharmacotherapy can currently be recommended for the cirrhotic stage. Management of MASH-related cirrhosis includes adaptations of metabolic drugs, nutritional counselling, surveillance for portal hypertension and HCC, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

Envisioning how to advance the MASH field

Since 1980, the cumulative effort of scientists and health-care stakeholders has advanced the prerequisites to address metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), a prevalent chronic non-communicable liver disease. This effort has led to, among others, the approval of the first drug specific for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH; formerly known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis). Despite substantial progress, MASLD is still a leading cause of advanced chronic liver disease, including primary liver cancer. This Perspective contextualizes the nomenclature change from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to MASLD and proposes important considerations to accelerate further progress in the field, optimize patient-centric multidisciplinary care pathways, advance pharmacological, behavioural and diagnostic research, and address health disparities. Key regulatory and other steps necessary to optimize the approval and access to upcoming additional pharmacological therapeutic agents for MASH are also outlined. We conclude by calling for increased education and awareness, enhanced health system preparedness, and concerted action by policy-makers to further the public health and policy agenda to achieve at least parity with other non-communicable diseases and to aid in growing the community of practice to reduce the human and economic burden and end the public health threat of MASLD and MASH by 2030.

Impact of metabolic phenotype and alcohol consumption on mortality risk in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study

Patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) often present with concomitant metabolic dysregulation and alcohol consumption, potentially leading to distinct clinical outcomes. We analyzed data from 8043 participants with MAFLD in the Thai National Health Examination Survey with linked mortality records. According to the MAFLD criteria, 1432 individuals (17.2%) were categorized as having the diabetes phenotype, 5894 (71.0%) as the overweight/obesity phenotype, and 978 (11.8%) as the lean metabolic phenotype. Over 71,145 person-years, 916 participants died. Using Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for physiological, lifestyle, and comorbid factors, both diabetes (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 1.59, 95% CI 1.18-2.13) and lean metabolic phenotypes (aHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01-1.64) exhibited significantly higher mortality risk compared to the overweight/obesity phenotype. A J-shaped relationship was observed between daily alcohol consumption and the risk of all-cause mortality. Daily alcohol intake exceeding 50 g for women and 60 g for men increased the all-cause mortality risk among MAFLD individuals with the lean metabolic phenotype (aHR 3.39, 95% CI 1.02-11.29). Our study found that metabolic phenotype and alcohol consumption have interactive effects on the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with MAFLD, indicating that evaluating both factors is crucial for determining prognostic outcomes and management strategies.

A prospective study on the prevalence of at-risk MASH in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the prevalence and treatment of at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the United States.

AIM

To estimate the prevalence of at-risk MASH in a prospectively recruited cohort of adults with T2DM using new nomenclature endorsed by multiple societies.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled adults aged ≥50 with T2DM from primary care and endocrinology clinics in southern California from 2016 to 2023. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) was defined by an magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction ≥5% and at least one metabolic risk factor without any other chronic liver disease or secondary cause for hepatic steatosis.

RESULTS

We included 530 adult patients with T2DM. The mean (±SD) age and body mass index (BMI) were 64.4 (±8.1) years and 31.5 (±6.1) kg/m2, respectively. Among patients with T2DM, the prevalence of MASLD, at-risk MASH and cirrhosis was 69.6%, 13.6% and 6.8%, respectively. Among patients with co-existing T2DM and obesity, the prevalence of MASLD, at-risk MASH and cirrhosis was 77.8%, 15.9% and 9.0%, respectively, and was higher than in participants without obesity (p < 0.0001, 0.0543 and 0.0128, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Among adults aged ≥50 years with T2DM, the prevalence of MASLD, at-risk MASH and cirrhosis is high, posing a significant risk for liver-related morbidity and mortality. Approximately 14% of patients with T2DM may be candidates for pharmacologic therapies specific to MASH-related fibrosis.

Surveillance of the liver in type 2 diabetes: important but unfeasible?

Fatty liver plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. According to an updated classification, any individual with liver steatosis and one or more features of the metabolic syndrome, without excess alcohol consumption or other known causes of steatosis, has metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Up to 60-70% of all individuals with type 2 diabetes have MASLD. However, the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis in type 2 diabetes remains uncertain, with reported estimates of 10-20% relying on imaging tests and likely overestimating the true prevalence. All stages of MASLD impact prognosis but fibrosis is the best predictor of all-cause and liver-related mortality risk. People with type 2 diabetes face a two- to threefold increase in the risk of liver-related death and hepatocellular carcinoma, with 1.3% progressing to severe liver disease over 7.7 years. Because reliable methods for detecting steatosis are lacking, MASLD mostly remains an incidental finding on imaging. Regardless, several medical societies advocate for universal screening of individuals with type 2 diabetes for advanced fibrosis. Proposed screening pathways involve annual calculation of the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, followed by a secondary test such as transient elastography (TE) for intermediate-to-high-risk individuals. However, owing to unsatisfactory biomarker specificity, these pathways are expected to channel approximately 40% of all individuals with type 2 diabetes to TE and 20% to tertiary care, with a false discovery rate of up to 80%, raising concerns about feasibility. There is thus an urgent need to develop more effective strategies for surveying the liver in type 2 diabetes. Nonetheless, weight loss through lifestyle changes, pharmacotherapy or bariatric surgery remains the cornerstone of management, proving highly effective not only for metabolic comorbidities but also for MASLD. Emerging evidence suggests that fibrosis biomarkers may serve as tools for risk-based targeting of weight-loss interventions and potentially for monitoring response to therapy.

Diagnosis and non-invasive assessment of MASLD in type 2 diabetes and obesity

BACKGROUND

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is currently the most common chronic liver disease and an important cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. It is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Because of the huge number of patients at risk of MASLD, it is imperative to use non-invasive tests appropriately.

AIMS

To provide a narrative review on the performance and limitations of non-invasive tests, with a special emphasis on the impact of diabetes and obesity.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases for articles published from 1990 to August 2023.

RESULTS

Abdominal ultrasonography remains the primary method to diagnose hepatic steatosis, while magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction is currently the gold standard to quantify steatosis. Simple fibrosis scores such as the Fibrosis-4 index are well suited as initial assessment in primary care and non-hepatology settings to rule out advanced fibrosis and future risk of liver-related complications. However, because of its low positive predictive value, an abnormal test should be followed by specific blood (e.g. Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score) or imaging biomarkers (e.g. vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography) of fibrosis. Some non-invasive tests of fibrosis appear to be less accurate in patients with diabetes. Obesity also affects the performance of abdominal ultrasonography and transient elastography, whereas magnetic resonance imaging may not be feasible in some patients with severe obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

This article highlights issues surrounding the clinical application of non-invasive tests for MASLD in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Use of PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and HSD17B13 for detection of fibrosis in MASLD in the general population

BACKGROUND

Genetic testing can be used to evaluate disease risk. We evaluated if the use of three Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), alone or combined into a genetic risk score (GRS), can aid identify significant fibrosis in subjects with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

METHODS

We assessed three known risk variants: PNPLA3 rs738409, TM6SF2 rs58542926, and HSD17B13 rs72613567. The study included 414 adult individuals invited from the Danish population, who were defined as at-risk of MASLD due to elevated ALT and body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2. Participants were assessed clinically and by the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and Fibroscan.

RESULTS

In total, 17 participants (4.1%) had alcohol-related liver disease, 79 (19.1%) had no evidence of liver disease, and four (1.0%) were diagnosed with other liver diseases, including malignant disease. The remaining 314 participants (75.8%) were diagnosed with MASLD. Of the 27 who underwent a liver biopsy for suspected fibrosis, 15 had significant fibrosis (≥F2) and 12 had no/mild fibrosis (F0/F1). The GRS was not associated with significant fibrosis (p=0.09) but PNPLA3 was with an odds ratio of 6.75 (95% CI 1.29 - 50.7; p=0.039) risk allele CG/GG versus CC. The diagnostic accuracy of PNPLA3 combined with an increased Fib-4 (>1.3) was excellent for detecting significant fibrosis with a sensitivity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.72-1.00), but the specificity was no better than for FIB-4 alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no evidence to support the use of GRS for diagnosing significant fibrosis in MASLD. However, the combination of PNPLA3 and Fib-4 increased sensitivity considerably. In addition, ALT remains a useful tool for screening diagnosing other liver diseases than MASLD.

Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis and Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver cirrhosis is often associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but research on treatment of T2D in cirrhotic patients is scarce. We investigated the long-term outcomes of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with T2D and cirrhosis.

METHODS

Using propensity score matching, we selected 467 matched pairs of GLP-1 RA users and nonusers from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2019. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the outcomes between GLP-1 RA users and nonusers.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 3.28 and 3.06 years for GLP-1 RA users and nonusers, respectively. The rates of death were 27.46 and 55.90 per 1000 person-years for GLP-1 RA users and nonusers, respectively. The multivariable-adjusted models showed that GLP-1 RA users had lower risks of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.69), cardiovascular events (aHR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.41-0.87), decompensated cirrhosis (aHR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.49-0.99), hepatic encephalopathy (aHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97), and liver failure (aHR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.85) than nonusers. A longer cumulative duration of GLP-1 RA use had a lower risk of these outcomes than GLP-1 RA nonuse.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based cohort study showed that GLP-1 RA users exhibited a significantly lower risk of death, cardiovascular events, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy, and liver failure in patients with T2D and compensated liver cirrhosis. Additional studies are needed to confirm our results.

Epidemiology, screening, and co-management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), previously known as NAFLD, is increasingly recognized as a prevalent global burden. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), another important metabolic disease, is considered a major contributor to the development of MASLD. MASLD and T2DM have a strong association with each other due to shared pathogenic mechanisms. The co-existence of the 2 diseases increases the risk of liver-related adverse outcomes and imposes a heavier burden on extrahepatic outcomes, representing a substantial public health issue. Effective assessment and management of T2DM combined with MASLD necessitate a multidisciplinary approach. The emergence of numerous RCTs has shed light on the treatment of T2DM combined with MASLD. This review uncovers the epidemiology of the intertwined T2DM and MASLD, offers insights into the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in patients with T2DM, glucose monitoring in the MASLD population, and provides comprehensive co-management strategies for addressing both diseases.

Prevalence and predictive features of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in type 1 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The prevalence and severity of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in type 1 diabetes remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence and severity of MASLD in type 1 diabetes and assessed which clinical features are most important in predicting MASLD severity.

METHODS

A total of 453 individuals with type 1 diabetes (41.6 ± 15.0 years, 64% female, body mass index [BMI] 25.4 ± 4.2 kg/m2, and HbA1c 55.6 ± 12 mmol/mol) underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), with a controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) score for steatosis (≥280.0 dB/m) and a liver stiffness measurement (LMS) for fibrosis (≥8.0 kPa). A machine learning Extra-Trees classification model was performed to assess the predictive power of the clinical features associated with type 1 diabetes with respect to steatosis and fibrosis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis was 9.5% (95% CI, 6.8-12.2) and 3.5% (95% CI, 1.8-5.2). Higher LMS was associated with a longer duration of type 1 diabetes (median 30.5 [IQR 18.0-39.3] years vs 15.0 [IQR 6.0-27.0] years), and individuals were older, had a higher BMI (mean 27.8 ± 5.2 vs 25.3 ± 4.1 kg/m2), and a higher CAP score (mean 211.4 ± 51.7 dB/m vs 241.4 ± 75.6 dB/m). The most important predictive features of fibrosis were duration of type 1 diabetes, age, and systolic blood pressure, with a mean ± SD area under the curve of 0.73 ± 0.03.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with type 1 diabetes and high blood pressure, older age, higher BMI, and longer duration of disease could be considered at high-risk for developing MASLD.

Validation of AGA clinical care pathway and AASLD practice guidance for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a prospective cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recently, the American Gastroenterological Association and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases developed clinical pathways to evaluate populations at high risk for NAFLD. We assessed the diagnostic performance of the new guidance in a well-phenotyped cohort of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This prospective study enrolled patients age ≥50 years with T2DM. Participants underwent a standardized clinical research visit with MRI and ultrasound-based assessment of liver fat and stiffness and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) testing. Of 417 participants (36% men) with T2DM with FIB-4 and MRE data, the prevalence of NAFLD was 64% and 12% had advanced fibrosis (MRE≥3.63 kPa). Applying the American Gastroenterological Association pathway of FIB-4 and vibration-controlled transient elastography, the false negative rate was 3.3% and 18% would qualify for specialty referral. Applying the FIB-4 + ELF American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases pathway, the false negative rate was 4.5%, but 50% would qualify for specialty referral. Applying higher ELF cut points improved the pathway, yielding a similar false negative rate of 4.9% but decreased specialty referral to 27%.

CONCLUSION

Validation of the American Gastroenterological Association clinical pathway in a prospectively recruited cohort with T2DM revealed a low false negative rate and avoided specialty referral in a large percentage of patients. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases pathway with FIB-4 + ELF resulted in a high rate of specialty referral, which improved with the utilization of higher ELF cut points and may serve as an alternative for primary care and endocrinology clinics without access to vibration-controlled transient elastography.

Screening for Fibrosis Promotes Lifestyle Changes: A Prospective Cohort Study in 4796 Individuals

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Early detection of liver fibrosis is believed to promote lifestyle changes. We evaluated self-reported changes in alcohol intake, diet, exercise, and weight after participating in a screening study for liver fibrosis.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective screening study of individuals at risk of alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We provided lifestyle advice to all participants and evaluated lifestyle changes by questionnaires after 1 week and 6 months, with re-examination of a subgroup after 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 1850 at risk of ALD and 2946 at risk of MASLD were included, of whom 383 (8%) were screening positive (transient elastography ≥8 kPa). A total of 84% replied to the 6-month questionnaire. In ALD participants, excessive drinking decreased from 46% to 32% after 6 months. Only 15% reported increased drinking, without differences between screening positive and negative individuals (P = .698). In high-risk drinkers, a positive screening test predicted abstinence or decreased alcohol use after 6 months (odds ratio, 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.57; P = .005). After 2 years, excessive drinking decreased from 52% to 41% in a subgroup of 752 individuals and a positive screening test predicted abstinence or decreased alcohol use after 2 years (odds ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.11, P = .023). MASLD participants showed similar improvements: 35% improved their diet, 22% exercised more, and 13% reported a weight loss ≥5% after 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for liver fibrosis is associated with sustained improvements in alcohol consumption, diet, weight, and exercise in at-risk ALD and MASLD. The changes are most pronounced in screening positive participants but not limited to this group.

Advancements in pharmacological treatment of NAFLD/MASLD: a focus on metabolic and liver-targeted interventions

In the present narrative review, we have summarized evidence on the pharmacological treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We start by reviewing the epidemiology of the condition and its close association with obesity and type 2 diabetes. We then discuss how randomized-controlled trials are performed following guidance from regulatory agencies, including differences and similarities between requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency. Difficulties and hurdles related to limitations of liver biopsy, a large number of screening failures in recruiting patients, as well as unpredictable response rates in the placebo group are evaluated. Finally, we recapitulate the strategies employed for potential drug treatments of this orphan condition. The first is to repurpose drugs that originally targeted T2DM and/or obesity, such as pioglitazone, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (liraglutide and semaglutide), multi-agonists (tirzepatide and retatrutide), and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors. The second is to develop drugs specifically targeting NAFLD/MASLD. Among those, we focused on resmetirom, fibroblast growth factor 21 analogs, and lanifibranor, as they are currently in Phase 3 of their clinical trial development. While many failures have characterized the field of pharmacological treatment of NAFLD/MASLD in the past, it is likely that approval of the first treatments is near. As occurs in many chronic conditions, combination therapy might lead to better outcomes. In the case of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, we speculate that drugs treating underlying metabolic co-morbidities might play a bigger role in the earlier stages of disease, while liver-targeting molecules will become vital in patients with more advanced disease in terms of inflammation and fibrosis.

Increased risk of chronic kidney disease and mortality in a cohort of people diagnosed with metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease with hepatic fibrosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) increases the risk of incident chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the relative risk of CKD associated with increasing hepatic fibrosis, and consequent mortality risk, remains underexplored in real-world cohorts. In this study, we sought to establish whether hepatic fibrosis is associated with increased CKD risk and explore differences in mortality risk in a cohort of people living with MASLD, contingent on liver fibrosis and CKD status.

METHODS

This was an observational study of people who underwent routine liver function testing in Tayside, Scotland. MASLD was defined as: elevated ALT (>30 U/L) or GGT (>73 U/L); presence of diabetes, and/or hypertension, and/or obesity; weekly alcohol consumption <14 units (112g (+/-8g) alcohol); and negative screen for other aetiologies. Data was collected from digital health records. We used log-binomial models to quantify the risk of CKD among those with and without fibrosis, and Cox regression models to estimate differences in mortality risk dependent on fibrosis and CKD.

RESULTS

In our cohort (n = 2,046), 1,448 (70.8%) people had MASLD without fibrosis and 598 (29.2%) with fibrosis; 161 (11.1%) and 117 (19.6%) respectively also had CKD. After excluding individuals with structural, autoimmune, or malignant CKD (n = 22), liver fibrosis (n = 593; 18.9% with CKD) was associated with increased CKD risk (aRR = 1.31, 1.04-1.64, p = 0.021). Increased mortality risk was observed for those with liver fibrosis (aHR = 2.30, 1.49-3.56, p = <0.001) and was higher again among people with both fibrosis and CKD (aHR = 5.07, 3.07-8.39, p = <0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver fibrosis was an independent risk factor for CKD in this cohort of people living with MASLD. Furthermore, those with MASLD with liver fibrosis had higher risk for mortality and this risk was further elevated among those with co-morbid CKD. Given the increased risk of CKD, and consequent mortality risk, among people living with MASLD fibrosis, renal function screening should be considered within liver health surveillance programmes and guidelines.

Elevated FIB-4 Is Associated with Higher Rates of Cardiovascular Disease and Extrahepatic Cancer History in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is often complicated by steatotic liver disease, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and extrahepatic cancer. We investigated whether FIB-4, an indicator of liver fibrosis, is associated with a higher risk of CVD and extrahepatic cancer history in T2DM.

METHODS

Two hundred and nine of 244 diabetics admitted to our center in one year were included and retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two (72.7%) were males and 57 (27.3%) females. The mean age and FIB-4 were 64.3 ± 11 years, and 1.15 ± 0.5, respectively. One hundred and fifty patients (71.8%) had FIB-4 ≤ 1.3, and 59 (28.2%) had FIB-4 > 1.3. A history of CVD was presented in 76 (36.4%) patients, and of extrahepatic cancer in 39 (18.7%). Patients with CVD were significantly older than those without (68.4 ± 8.5 vs. 63.2 ± 11.5 years; p = 0.002), with significantly higher FIB-4 (1.26 ± 0.5 vs. 1.08 ± 0.5; p = 0.012). Patients with cancer were older, with higher FIB-4 compared to those without (68.2 ± 9.5 vs. 64.4 ± 10.9 years; p = 0.098 and 1.37 ± 0.6 vs. 1.1 ± 0.5; p = 0.004, respectively). FIB-4 > 1.3 was associated with a 2.1-fold probability for CVD (χ2 = 5.810; p = 0.025) and 2.7-fold probability for cancer history (χ2 = 7.603; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

FIB-4 ≥ 1.3 is associated with a higher probability of CVD or extrahepatic cancer history. FIB-4 could potentially discriminate patients at risk, justifying stricter surveillance.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and risk of major adverse liver outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease and type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Phase II trials suggest glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1) agonists resolve metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis but do not affect fibrosis regression. We aimed to determine the long-term causal effect of GLP1 agonists on the risk of major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in patients with any chronic liver disease and type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

We used observational data from Swedish healthcare registers 2010-2020 to emulate a target trial of GLP1 agonists in eligible patients with chronic liver disease and type 2 diabetes. We used an inverse-probability weighted marginal structural model to compare parametric estimates of 10-year MALO risk (decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation or MALO-related death) in initiators of GLP1 agonists with non-initiators. We randomly sampled 5% of the non-initiators to increase computational efficiency.

RESULTS

GLP1 agonist initiators had a 10-year risk of MALO at 13.3% (42/1026) vs 14.6% in non-initiators (1079/15 633) in intention-to-treat analysis (risk ratio (RR)=0.91, 95% CI=0.50 to 1.32). The corresponding 10-year per-protocol risk estimates were 7.4% (22/1026) and 14.4% (1079/15 633), respectively (RR=0.51, 95% CI=0.14 to 0.88). The per-protocol risk estimates at 6 years were 5.4% (21/1026) vs 9.0% (933/15 633) (RR=0.60, 95% CI=0.29 to 0.90) and at 8 years 7.2% (22/1026) vs 11.7% (1036/15 633) (RR=0.61, 95% CI=0.21 to 1.01).

CONCLUSION

In patients with chronic liver disease and type 2 diabetes who adhered to therapy over time, GLP1 agonists may result in lower risk of MALO. This suggests that GLP1 agonists are promising agents to reduce risk of chronic liver disease progression in patients with concurrent type 2 diabetes, although this needs to be corroborated in randomised trials.

Electronic sanitary database: a new potential tool to identify occult chronic liver disease in general population

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a leading global cause of mortality, morbidity, and healthcare resource utilization. However, the burden of CLD is underestimated because the course of the disease is often asymptomatic until clinical decompensation and the development of life-threatening complications. In this study, we assessed the use of available blood tests from electronic medical records for identifying individuals with undiagnosed CLD in the general population. We analyzed a total of 202,529 blood tests obtained from 99,848 adults recorded in the Electronic Health Records of the Padova Teaching Hospital. Transaminases levels > 1.5 times the normal value indicated occult CLD, while platelet counts < 120,000/μL identified occult cirrhosis. We characterized patients using Italian Medical Exemptions (IME), excluding oncologic cases. Overt and occult cirrhosis prevalence was 1% and 4.18%, respectively, while overt and occult CLD affected 2.85% and 4.61% of the population. The epidemiology of patients with overt and occult cirrhosis was similar but significantly different from that of the controls. Among subjects aged 60-70 years, working disability was twofold higher in those with occult cirrhosis compared to those with overt cirrhosis. Occult CLD and cirrhosis had higher prevalence rates than diagnosed cases in the general population. Electronic medical record data may serve as a valuable tool for CLD identification, potentially reducing cirrhosis development and clinical decompensation. This, in turn, may lead to a decrease in the economic impact on the healthcare system.

TyG-GGT is a Reliable Non-Invasive Predictor of Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Overweight or Obese Individuals

BACKGROUND

Liver fibrosis is a predisposing factor for liver cancer. This study will investigate the predictive role of the Triglyceride-glucose and Gamma-glutamyl transferase index (TyG-GGT) as a non-invasive indicator of advanced liver fibrosis in individuals with obesity or overweight.

METHOD

We enrolled patients who underwent metabolic and bariatric surgery as well as intraoperative liver biopsies at Zhejiang provincial people's hospital from August 2020 to March 2023. Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory data, and pathological variables of patients were collected and analysed. Then, we conducted logistics regression model to compare the performance of the TyG-GGT index with other 4 non-invasive models.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were included in this study. 43(66.2%) of them were female, with the mean body mass index (BMI) of 39.0 ± 7.3 kg/m2. Meanwhile, 24(36.9%) patients were diagnosed with diabetes. Advanced liver fibrosis were observed in 16.9% of patients, while liver cirrhosis was found in 4.6% of patients. The multivariable logistics regression showed that TyG-GGT was an independent risk factor of advanced liver fibrosis (OR = 6.989, P = 0.049). Additionally, compared to another 4 non-invasive liver fibrosis models (NFS = 0.66, FIB4 = 0.65, METS-IR = 0.68, APRI = 0.65), TyG-GGT exhibits the highest AUC value of 0.75.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one-third of patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery are afflicted with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and a significant proportion exhibit advanced fibrosis. TyG-GGT was a potentially reliable predictor for screening individuals with overweight or obesity at high risk of advanced liver fibrosis, thus providing clinical guidance for early intervention in this targeted group.

Prospective head-to-head comparison of non-invasive scores for diagnosis of fibrotic MASH in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Non-invasive scores have been proposed to identify patients with fibrotic, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), who are at the highest risk of progression to complications of cirrhosis and may benefit from pharmacologic treatments. However, data in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are lacking. The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of FAST (FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase [AST]), MAST (MRI-AST), MEFIB (magnetic resonance elastography [MRE] plus FIB-4), and FNI (fibrotic NASH index) for detecting fibrotic MASH in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

A total of 330 outpatients with T2DM and biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) from the QUID-NASH study (NCT03634098), who underwent FibroScan, MRI-proton density fat fraction and MRE at the time of liver biopsy were studied. The main outcome was fibrotic MASH, defined as NAS ≥4 (with at least one point for each parameter) and fibrosis stage ≥2 (centrally reviewed).

RESULTS

All data for score comparisons were available for 245 patients (median age 59 years, 65% male, median BMI 31 kg/m2; fibrotic MASH in 39%). FAST and MAST had similar accuracy (AUROCs 0.81 vs. 0.79, p = 0.41) but outperformed FNI (0.74; p = 0.01) and MEFIB (0.68; p <0.0001). When using original cut-offs, MAST outperformed FAST, MEFIB and FNI when comparing the percentage of correctly classified patients, in whom liver biopsy would be avoided (69% vs. 48%, 46%, 39%, respectively; p <0.001). When using cut-offs specific to our population, FAST outperformed FNI and MAST (56% vs. 40%, and 38%, respectively; p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that FAST, MAST, MEFIB and FNI are accurate non-invasive tools to identify patients with T2DM and fibrotic MASH in secondary/tertiary diabetes clinics. Cut-offs adapted to the T2DM population should be considered.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), identifying those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and significant fibrosis, who are the most at risk of developing clinical liver-related outcomes and who may benefit from pharmacologic treatments, is an unmet need. In this prospective multicenter study, we compared four non-invasive scores, three based on imaging (MRI or ultrasound technologies) and one on laboratory blood tests, for this purpose, using original and study-specific cut-offs. Our findings show that FAST, MAST, MEFIB and FNI are accurate non-invasive tools to identify patients with T2DM and fibrotic MASH in secondary/tertiary diabetes clinics. Cut-offs adapted to the T2DM population should be considered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03634098.

Global survey of stigma among physicians and patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with fatty liver disease may experience stigma from the disease or comorbidities. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to understand stigma among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and healthcare providers.

METHODS

Members of the Global NASH Council created two surveys about experiences/attitudes toward NAFLD and related diagnostic terms: a 68-item patient and a 41-item provider survey.

RESULTS

Surveys were completed by 1,976 patients with NAFLD across 23 countries (51% Middle East/North Africa [MENA], 19% Europe, 17% USA, 8% Southeast Asia, 5% South Asia) and 825 healthcare providers (67% gastroenterologists/hepatologists) across 25 countries (39% MENA, 28% Southeast Asia, 22% USA, 6% South Asia, 3% Europe). Of all patients, 48% ever disclosed having NAFLD/NASH to family/friends; the most commonly used term was "fatty liver" (88% at least sometimes); "metabolic disease" or "MAFLD" were rarely used (never by >84%). Regarding various perceptions of diagnostic terms by patients, there were no substantial differences between "NAFLD", "fatty liver disease (FLD)", "NASH", or "MAFLD". The most popular response was being neither comfortable nor uncomfortable with either term (56%-71%), with slightly greater discomfort with "FLD" among the US and South Asian patients (47-52% uncomfortable). Although 26% of patients reported stigma related to overweight/obesity, only 8% reported a history of stigmatization or discrimination due to NAFLD. Among providers, 38% believed that the term "fatty" was stigmatizing, while 34% believed that "nonalcoholic" was stigmatizing, more commonly in MENA (43%); 42% providers (gastroenterologists/hepatologists 45% vs. 37% other specialties, p = 0.03) believed that the name change to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (or MASLD) might reduce stigma. Regarding the new nomenclature, the percentage of providers reporting "steatotic liver disease" as stigmatizing was low (14%).

CONCLUSIONS

The perception of NAFLD stigma varies among patients, providers, geographic locations and sub-specialties.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Over the past decades, efforts have been made to change the nomenclature of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to better align with its underlying pathogenetic pathways and remove any potential stigma associated with the name. Given the paucity of data related to stigma in NAFLD, we undertook this global comprehensive survey to assess stigma in NAFLD among patients and providers from around the world. We found there is a disconnect between physicians and patients related to stigma and related nomenclature. With this knowledge, educational programs can be developed to better target stigma in NAFLD among all stakeholders and to provide a better opportunity for the new nomenclature to address the issues of stigma.

Exploring the links between types 2 diabetes and liver-related complications: A comprehensive review

In recent decades, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes has been steadily increasing, presenting a significant global public health challenge. These epidemiological trends can be attributed to significant lifestyle changes in modern societies, characterized by sedentary behavior and the consumption of hypercaloric, highly processed foods, along with the aging of the human population. As a result, it has become crucial for both public healthcare systems and healthcare providers to prioritize the management of diabetes and identify its systemic consequences. Emerging research has shed light on the links and risks between diabetes and liver events. This comprehensive review aims to explore the complex interplay between type 2 diabetes mellitus and liver-related outcomes, especially hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis, offering insights into effective methods for detecting liver risk in individuals with diabetes. Additionally, the review will assess the various treatments that could hold the potential for positive outcomes in managing both diabetes and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and liver fibrosis.

The Emerging Role of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) affects 1 in 3-4 adult individuals and can progress to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and cirrhosis. Insulin resistance plays a central role in MASLD/MASH pathophysiology with higher rates of MASLD (2 in 3) and MASH with fibrosis (1 in 5) in adults with obesity and diabetes. This review summarizes the role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in treating MASLD/MASH. Although not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of MASLD, this class of medication is available to treat obesity and type 2 diabetes and has been shown to reverse steatohepatitis, reduce cardiovascular risk, and is safe to use across the spectrum of MASLD with or without fibrosis.

Making Sense of the Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Clinical Practice Guidelines: What Clinicians Need to Know

Standards of care summarized in clinical practice guidelines for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) offer clinicians a streamlined diagnostic and management approach based on the best available evidence. These recommendations have changed a great deal in recent years; today, there is a clear focus on screening for the early identification and risk stratification of patients at high risk of steatohepatitis and clinically significant fibrosis to promote timely referrals to specialty care when needed. This article reviews and provides the rationale for current guidelines for NAFLD screening, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring and addresses barriers to providing evidence-based NAFLD care and how to overcome them. The current paradigm of care calls for primary care clinicians and specialists to work together, within a multidisciplinary care team familiar with obesity and diabetes care, to provide comprehensive management of these complex patients.

Role of Insulin Resistance in the Development of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in People With Type 2 Diabetes: From Bench to Patient Care

Insulin resistance is implicated in both the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its progression from steatosis to steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma, which is known to be more common in people with type 2 diabetes. This article reviews the role of insulin resistance in the metabolic dysfunction observed in obesity, type 2 diabetes, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and hypertension and how it is a driver of the natural history of NAFLD by promoting glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity. The authors also review the genetic and environmental factors that stimulate steatohepatitis and fibrosis progression and their relationship with cardiovascular disease and summarize guidelines supporting the treatment of NAFLD with diabetes medications that reduce insulin resistance, such as pioglitazone or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists.

Liver stiffness as a cornerstone in heart disease risk assessment

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) typically presents with hepatic fibrosis in advanced disease, resulting in increased liver stiffness. A subset of patients further develops liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovascular disease is a common comorbidity in patients with MASLD and its prevalence is increasing in parallel. Recent evidence suggests that especially liver stiffness, whether or not existing against a background of MASLD, is associated with heart diseases. We conducted a narrative review on the role of liver stiffness in the prediction of highly prevalent heart diseases including heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias (in particular atrial fibrillation), coronary heart disease, and aortic valve sclerosis. Research papers were retrieved from major scientific databases (PubMed, Web of Science) until September 2023 using 'liver stiffness' and 'liver fibrosis' as keywords along with the latter cardiac conditions. Increased liver stiffness, determined by vibration-controlled transient elastography or hepatic fibrosis as predicted by biomarker panels, are associated with a variety of cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and coronary heart disease. Elevated liver stiffness in patients with metabolic liver disease should lead to considerations of cardiac workup including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide/B-type natriuretic peptide determination, electrocardiography, and coronary computed tomography angiography. In addition, patients with MASLD would benefit from heart disease case-finding strategies in which liver stiffness measurements can play a key role. In conclusion, increased liver stiffness should be a trigger to consider a cardiac workup in metabolically compromised patients.

Obesity and harmful alcohol consumption are predictors for advanced liver disease in the disease management program for type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major risk factor for advanced liver disease. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in primary care centers participating in the diabetes disease management program (DMP) in Germany.

METHODS

A total of 175 participants with the diagnosis of T2DM were enrolled in two primary care centers. Steatotic liver disease (SLD; hepatic steatosis, ≥275 dB/m), fibrosis (≥8 kPa), and cirrhosis (≥15 kPa) were assessed non-invasively using vibration-controlled transient elastography. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify clinical predictors of fibrosis and cirrhosis. The AUDIT questionnaire was used to screen for alcohol consumption, and a score ≥8 was considered harmful alcohol consumption.

RESULTS

The majority of participants were male (62%), and the median age was 66 years (interquartile range 59; 71). The median body mass index was 31.1 kg/m2 , with 58.9% of the participants being obese. Harmful alcohol consumption was prevalent in 8.0% and 20.0% of the entire cohort and in those with cirrhosis, respectively. The prevalence of SLD, fibrosis, and cirrhosis was 77.1%, 42.3%, and 12.0%, respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, obesity, and harmful alcohol consumption were associated with the highest odds of fibrosis (odds ratio [OR] 5.198, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.269-11.908) and cirrhosis (OR 5.615, 95% CI 1.274-24.756), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients seen in the diabetes DMP in Germany is high. Obesity and harmful alcohol consumption increase the risk of fibrosis and cirrhosis in people with T2DM. Screening for advanced liver disease and associated risk factors within the DMP program may reduce the liver disease burden in this high-risk population.

Discovery of a peripheral 5HT2A antagonist as a clinical candidate for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis

Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) is currently the leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH), an advanced form of MASLD, can progress to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Based on recent findings by our team that liver 5HT2A knockout male mice suppressed steatosis and reduced fibrosis-related gene expression, we developed a peripheral 5HT2A antagonist, compound 11c for MASH. It shows good in vitro activity, stability, and in vivo pharmacokinetics (PK) in rats and dogs. Compound 11c also shows good in vivo efficacy in a diet-induced obesity (DIO) male mice model and in a choline-deficient, L-amino acid-defined, high-fat diet (CDAHFD) male mice model, effectively improving histologic features of MASH and fibrosis. According to the tissue distribution study using [14C]-labeled 11c, the compound was determined to be a peripheral 5HT2A antagonist. Collectively, first-in-class compound 11c shows promise as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of MASLD and MASH.

Inverse association between type 2 diabetes and hepatocellular carcinoma in East Asian populations

Aims

To investigate the potential association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in East Asian populations using Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.

Methods

Bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) studies were conducted using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) related to T2D and HCC. The potential effects of confounders such as chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C, body mass index, and alcohol intake frequency were corrected using a multivariate MR study. Various MR methods, including the inverse variance weighted (IVW) approach, were used to estimate the associations between T2D and HCC. Sensitivity analysis and assessment of heterogeneity were performed to ensure the robustness of the results.

Results

In the forward MR study, the IVW approach of MR analysis suggested an inverse association between T2D and HCC, with a risk odds ratio of 0.8628 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7888-0.9438). Furthermore, even after adjusting for BMI, chronic hepatitis B, and alcohol intake frequency, this study still supports the inverse association between T2D and HCC. Additional MR methods provided further support for this relationship. Sensitivity analysis and assessment of heterogeneity confirmed the robustness of the results. The reverse MR analysis did not show a clear impact of genetic liability to HCC on reduced risk of T2D(OR=0.9788; 95% CI, 0.9061-1.0574).

Conclusion

This study provides evidence of an inverse association between T2D and HCC in East Asian populations using MR analysis. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.

MASLD, hepatic steatosis and fibrosis are associated with the prevalence of chronic kidney disease and retinopathy in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus

AIM

We examined whether metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) with or without significant fibrosis (assessed by validated non-invasive biomarkers) was associated with an increased risk of prevalent chronic kidney disease (CKD) or diabetic retinopathy in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicenter cross-sectional study involving 1,409 adult outpatients with T1DM, in whom hepatic steatosis index (HSI) and fibrosis (FIB)-4 index were calculated for non-invasively detecting hepatic steatosis (defined by HSI > 36), with or without coexisting significant fibrosis (FIB-4 index ≥ 1.3 or < 1.3). CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or urine albumin/creatinine ratio ≥ 3.0 mg/mmol. The presence of diabetic retinopathy was also recorded in all participants.

RESULTS

Patients with MASLD and significant fibrosis (n = 93) had a remarkably higher prevalence of CKD and diabetic retinopathy than their counterparts with MASLD without fibrosis (n = 578) and those without steatosis (n = 738). After adjustment for sex, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c, hypertension, and use of antihypertensive or lipid-lowering medications, patients with SLD and significant fibrosis had a higher risk of prevalent CKD (adjusted-odds ratio 1.76, 95 % confidence interval 1.05-2.96) than those without steatosis. Patients with MASLD without fibrosis had a higher risk of prevalent retinopathy (adjusted-odds ratio 1.49, 95 % CI 1.13-1.46) than those without steatosis.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest cross-sectional study showing that MASLD with and without coexisting significant fibrosis was associated, independently of potential confounders, with an increased risk of prevalent CKD and retinopathy in adults with T1DM.

Implications of the new nomenclature of steatotic liver disease and definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

BACKGROUND

The American and European liver associations have endorsed new nomenclature of steatotic liver disease (SLD) and definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

AIMS

To review the historical development leading to the changes and to discuss the implications of the changes on research and clinical practice METHODS: We performed a literature search using keywords related to MASLD and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

RESULTS

The SLD umbrella allows classification of patients under the key categories of MASLD, alcohol-associated liver disease and a new entity termed MetALD, which represents MASLD with increased alcohol intake. The diagnosis of MASLD requires the demonstration of hepatic steatosis and at least one metabolic risk factor, whereas MASLD can co-exist with other liver diseases such as chronic viral hepatitis. Despite the change in definition, over 95% of patients previously known as having NAFLD fulfil diagnostic criteria for MASLD. It is conceivable that future clinical trials and biomarker studies will continue to exclude concomitant liver diseases. As most patients with MASLD are seen at primary care and non-hepatology settings, communication with other stakeholders is essential to ensure disease awareness and smooth adoption of the changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The new nomenclature is both a challenge, given the need for dissemination and education across the spectrum of stakeholders, and an opportunity to bring everyone together and spark new research to better understand epidemiology, natural history, diagnosis, biomarkers and management strategies across the spectrum of SLD.

Implementation of a liver health check in people with type 2 diabetes

As morbidity and mortality related to potentially preventable liver diseases are on the rise globally, early detection of liver fibrosis offers a window of opportunity to prevent disease progression. Early detection of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease allows for initiation and reinforcement of guidance on bodyweight management, risk stratification for advanced liver fibrosis, and treatment optimisation of diabetes and other metabolic complications. Identification of alcohol-related liver disease provides the opportunity to support patients with detoxification and abstinence programmes. In all patient groups, identification of cirrhosis ensures that patients are enrolled in surveillance programmes for hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension. When considering early detection strategies, success can be achieved from applying ad-hoc screening for liver fibrosis in established frameworks of care. Patients with type 2 diabetes are an important group to consider case findings of advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, as up to 19% have advanced fibrosis (which is ten times higher than the general population) and almost 70% have non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Additionally, patients with type 2 diabetes with alcohol use disorders have the highest proportion of liver-related morbidity of people with type 2 diabetes generally. Patients with type 2 diabetes receive an annual diabetes review as part of their routine clinical care, in which the health of many organs are considered. Yet, liver health is seldom included in this review. This Viewpoint argues that augmenting the existing risk stratification strategy with an additional liver health check provides the opportunity to detect advanced liver fibrosis, thereby opening a window for early interventions to prevent end-stage liver disease and its complications, including hepatocellular carcinoma.

A prospective study on the prevalence of MASLD in people with type-2 diabetes in the community. Cost effectiveness of screening strategies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

As screening for the liver disease and risk-stratification pathways are not established in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we evaluated the diagnostic performance and the cost-utility of different screening strategies for MASLD in the community.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with T2DM from primary care underwent screening for liver diseases, ultrasound, ELF score and transient elastography (TE). Five strategies were compared to the standard of care: ultrasound plus abnormal liver function tests (LFTs), Fibrosis score-4 (FIB-4), NAFLD fibrosis score, Enhanced liver fibrosis test (ELF) and TE. Standard of care was defined as abnormal LFTs prompting referral to hospital. A Markov model was built based on the fibrosis stage, defined by TE. We generated the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a lifetime horizon.

RESULTS

Of 300 patients, 287 were included: 64% (186) had MASLD and 10% (28) had other causes of liver disease. Patients with significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis due to MASLD were 17% (50/287), 11% (31/287) and 3% (8/287), respectively. Among those with significant fibrosis classified by LSM≥8.1 kPa, false negatives were 54% from ELF and 38% from FIB-4. On multivariate analysis, waist circumference, BMI, AST levels and education rank were independent predictors of significant and advanced fibrosis. All the screening strategies were associated with QALY gains, with TE (148.73 years) having the most substantial gains, followed by FIB-4 (134.07 years), ELF (131.68 years) and NAFLD fibrosis score (121.25 years). In the cost-utility analysis, ICER was £2480/QALY for TE, £2541.24/QALY for ELF and £2059.98/QALY for FIB-4.

CONCLUSION

Screening for MASLD in the diabetic population in primary care is cost-effective and should become part of a holistic assessment. However, traditional screening strategies, including FIB-4 and ELF, underestimate the presence of significant liver disease in this setting.

MASLD and aspartame: are new studies in the horizon?

Fatty liver disease has been on the rise in the past few decades, and there is no hope that it will stop. The terminology change that has been recently proposed may not be sufficient to advocate for a reduction of steatogenic foods and a change in lifestyle. A course change may be supported by the recent labeling of aspartame sweetener as a possible carcinogenic compound by the International Association for Research on Cancer (IARC), an agency of the World Health Organization (WHO). Aspartame sweeteners and other edulcorating molecular compounds besides colorings may trigger liver cancer other than fatty liver disease, despite limited data supporting it. An essential bias in human cohort studies is indeed the exclusion of all confounding factors, which may be barely impossible for human studies. In this perspective, we suggest that the activation of the NOD-like receptor-enclosing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome and the stimulation of the tumor suppression gene TP53 may be critical in the progression from fatty liver to liver inflammation and liver cancer. Aspartame reduces a transcriptional coactivator, precisely the peroxisomal proliferator-initiated receptor-γ (gamma) coactivator 1-α (alpha) (or PGC1α). This coactivator upregulates mitochondrial bioformation, oxidative phosphorylation, respiratory capacity, and fatty acid β-oxidation. Aspartame acts in this way, probably through the activation of TP53. These events have been accountable for the variations in the lipid outline in serum and total lipid storage as well as for the impairment of gluconeogenesis in the liver, as supported by the downregulation of the gluconeogenic enzymes in experimental animals, and may be relevant in humans as well.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Liver Disease: Current Trends and Future Directions

This narrative review delves into the intricate landscape of liver diseases, providing a comprehensive background of the diverse conditions that afflict this vital organ. Liver diseases, ranging from viral hepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pose significant global health challenges. Understanding these diseases' multifaceted origins and progression is pivotal for developing effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. The epidemiology and etiology of liver diseases emphasize the global impact of viral hepatitis, with hepatitis B and C as significant contributors. Concurrently, the rising prevalence of NAFLD, linked to lifestyle factors and metabolic syndrome, underscores the intricate relationship between modern living and liver health. Chronic liver diseases often evolve insidiously, progressing from inflammation to fibrosis and, ultimately, to cirrhosis - a stage characterized by irreversible scarring and compromised function. The heightened risk of HCC in advanced liver disease stages further underscores the urgency of effective diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The evolving landscape of non-invasive diagnostic tools is explored for their role in enabling early detection and accurate staging of liver diseases. In the realm of treatment, there is a continuous transition toward personalized medicine, customized to suit the unique profiles of individual patients. This shift encompasses a broad spectrum, ranging from personalized pharmacological interventions to lifestyle modifications and surgical options. Delving into innovative therapies, such as gene editing and immunomodulation, offers a glimpse into the promising future directions that have the potential to redefine the landscape of liver disease diagnosis and treatment.

Magnetic resonance elastography-based prediction model for hepatic decompensation in NAFLD: A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an accurate, continuous biomarker of liver fibrosis; however, the optimal combination with clinical factors to predict the risk of incident hepatic decompensation is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate an MRE-based prediction model for hepatic decompensation for patients with NAFLD.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This international multicenter cohort study included participants with NAFLD undergoing MRE from 6 hospitals. A total of 1254 participants were randomly assigned as training (n = 627) and validation (n = 627) cohorts. The primary end point was hepatic decompensation, defined as the first occurrence of variceal hemorrhage, ascites, or HE. Covariates associated with hepatic decompensation on Cox-regression were combined with MRE to construct a risk prediction model in the training cohort and then tested in the validation cohort. The median (IQR) age and MRE values were 61 (18) years and 3.5 (2.5) kPa in the training cohort and 60 (20) years and 3.4 (2.5) kPa in the validation cohort, respectively. The MRE-based multivariable model that included age, MRE, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, and platelets had excellent discrimination for the 3- and 5-year risk of hepatic decompensation (c-statistic 0.912 and 0.891, respectively) in the training cohort. The diagnostic accuracy remained consistent in the validation cohort with a c-statistic of 0.871 and 0.876 for hepatic decompensation at 3 and 5 years, respectively, and was superior to Fibrosis-4 in both cohorts ( p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

An MRE-based prediction model allows for accurate prediction of hepatic decompensation and assists in the risk stratification of patients with NAFLD.

A Cross-sectional Real-life Study of the Prevalence, Severity, and Determinants of Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Background and Aims

Most data on liver assessment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients are from retrospective cohorts with selection bias. We aimed at appraising the feasibility, results, and benefits of an outpatient systematic noninvasive screening for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) severity and determinants in T2DM patients.

Methods

We conducted a 50-week cross-sectional study enrolling adult T2DM outpatients from a diabetes clinic. An algorithm based on guidelines was applied using simple bioclinical scores and, if applicable, ultrasound and/or elastometry.

Results

Two hundred and thirteen patients were included. Mean age and body mass index were 62 years and 31 kg/m2 and 29% of patients had abnormal transaminase levels. The acceptance rate of additional liver examinations was 92%. The prevalence of MAFLD, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis was 87%, 11%, and 4%, respectively. More than half of the cases of advanced fibrosis had not been suspected and were detected by this screening. MAFLD was associated with poor glycemic control, elevated transaminases, low HDL-C and the absence of peripheral arterial disease. Advanced fibrosis was linked to high waist circumference and excessive alcohol consumption, which should be interpreted with caution owing to the small number of patients reporting excessive consumption.

Conclusions

Simple bioclinical tools allowed routine triage of T2DM patients for MAFLD severity, with high adherence of high-risk patients to subsequent noninvasive exams.

Irisin suppresses pancreatic β cell pyroptosis in T2DM by inhibiting the NLRP3-GSDMD pathway and activating the Nrf2-TrX/TXNIP signaling axis

BACKGROUND

Irisin plays a key role in metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the mechanism underlying the link between irisin and the development of T2DM, particularly in pancreatic islet β-cells, remains unknown.

METHODS

In vitro, Min6 cells were treated with high glucose (HG) to generate T2DM cell models. GSDMD-N staining, Western blotting assays, and ELISA were performed to measure the expression levels of GSDMD, caspase 1, IL-1β, and IL-18. Next, the NLRP3 stimulator, ATP, was used to assess the effect of irisin on NLRP3 inflammasome. To evaluate the function of the Nrf2-TrX/TXNIP signaling axis, the Nrf2 inhibitor ML385 was used. For in vivo assessment, we first established T2DM model mice. Then, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed to observe the islet morphology, and the immunofluorescence technique was used to examine the mass of α and β cells. To confirm the role of the Nrf2-TrX/TXNIP signaling axis, ML385 was injected into the mice. Immunofluorescence of Nrf2, caspase 1, and GSDMD was detected in the islet cells of the model mice to verify the results.

RESULTS

We found that irisin treatment significantly decreased the expression of GSDMD-N (P31) and cleaved caspase-1 (p20), decreased caspase1 activity, and inhibited the secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 in HG-treated Min6 cells. We also found that irisin inhibited oxidative stress and NLRP3 expression by activating the Nrf2-TrX/TXNIP signaling axis. Additionally, in the T2DM model mice, irisin enhanced the function of islet cells, decreased insulin resistance, and preserved the morphology of pancreatic islets.

CONCLUSION

We showed in this study that irisin can be used for treating pyroptosis in HG-induced islet β-cells and T2DM model mice. We also found that irisin inhibits pyroptosis and oxidative stress by inhibiting the NLRP3-GSDMD pathway and activating the Nrf2-TrX/TXNIP signaling axis.