1
|
Gligorić K, Zbinden R, Chiolero A, Kıcıman E, White RW, Horvitz E, West R. Measuring and shaping the nutritional environment via food sales logs: case studies of campus-wide food choice and a call to action. Front Nutr 2024; 11:1231070. [PMID: 38899323 PMCID: PMC11186467 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1231070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Although diets influence health and the environment, measuring and changing nutrition is challenging. Traditional measurement methods face challenges, and designing and conducting behavior-changing interventions is conceptually and logistically complicated. Situated local communities such as university campuses offer unique opportunities to shape the nutritional environment and promote health and sustainability. The present study investigates how passively sensed food purchase logs typically collected as part of regular business operations can be used to monitor and measure on-campus food consumption and understand food choice determinants. First, based on 38 million sales logs collected on a large university campus over eight years, we perform statistical analyses to quantify spatio-temporal determinants of food choice and characterize harmful patterns in dietary behaviors, in a case study of food purchasing at EPFL campus. We identify spatial proximity, food item pairing, and academic schedules (yearly and daily) as important determinants driving the on-campus food choice. The case studies demonstrate the potential of food sales logs for measuring nutrition and highlight the breadth and depth of future possibilities to study individual food-choice determinants. We describe how these insights provide an opportunity for stakeholders, such as campus offices responsible for managing food services, to shape the nutritional environment and improve health and sustainability by designing policies and behavioral interventions. Finally, based on the insights derived through the case study of food purchases at EPFL campus, we identify five future opportunities and offer a call to action for the nutrition research community to contribute to ensuring the health and sustainability of on-campus populations-the very communities to which many researchers belong.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Arnaud Chiolero
- Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
- School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Eric Horvitz
- Office of the Chief Scientific Officer, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, United States
| | - Robert West
- Data Science Lab, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silver I, Berman JZ. What drives disagreement about moral hypocrisy? Perceived comparability and how people exploit it to criticize enemies and defend allies. Cognition 2024; 247:105773. [PMID: 38564850 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Charges of hypocrisy are usually thought to be to be damning. Yet when a hypocrisy charge is made, there often remains disagreement about whether or not its target really is a hypocrite. Why? Three pre-registered experiments (N = 2599) conceptualize and test the role of perceived comparability in evaluating hypocrisy. Calling someone a hypocrite typically entails invoking a comparison-one meant to highlight internal contradiction and cast moral character into question. Yet there is ambiguity about which sorts of comparisons are valid in the first place. We argue that disagreements about moral hypocrisy often boil down to disagreements about comparability. Although the comparability of two situations should not depend on whose behavior is being scrutinized, observers shift comparability judgments in line with social motives to criticize or defend. In short, we identify a cognitive factor that can help to explain why, for similar patterns of behavior, people see hypocrisy in their enemies but consistency in themselves and their allies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ike Silver
- Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Winkler-Schor S, Brauer M. What Happens When Payments End? Fostering Long-Term Behavior Change With Financial Incentives. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE 2024:17456916241247152. [PMID: 38767968 DOI: 10.1177/17456916241247152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Financial incentives are widely used to get people to adopt desirable behaviors. Many small landholders in developing countries, for example, receive multiyear payments to engage in conservation behaviors, and the hope is that they will continue to engage in these behaviors after the program ends. Although effective in the short term, financial incentives rarely lead to long-term behavior change because program participants tend to revert to their initial behaviors soon after the payments stop. In this article, we propose that four psychological constructs can be leveraged to increase the long-term effectiveness of financial-incentive programs: motivation, habit formation, social norms, and recursive processes. We review successful and unsuccessful behavior-change initiatives involving financial incentives in several domains: public health, education, sustainability, and conservation. We make concrete recommendations on how to implement the four above-mentioned constructs in field settings. Finally, we identify unresolved issues that future research might want to address to advance knowledge, promote theory development, and understand the psychological mechanisms that can be used to improve the effectiveness of incentive programs in the real world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Markus Brauer
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stecher C, Chen CH, Codella J, Cloonan S, Hendler J. Combining anchoring with financial incentives to increase physical activity: a randomized controlled trial among college students. J Behav Med 2024:10.1007/s10865-024-00492-4. [PMID: 38704776 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-024-00492-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to: (1) compare the relative efficacy of different combinations of three behavioral intervention strategies (i.e., personalized reminders, financial incentives, and anchoring) for establishing physical activity habits using an mHealth app and (2) to examine the effects of these different combined interventions on intrinsic motivation for physical activity and daily walking habit strength. A four-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in a sample of college students (N = 161) who had a self-reported personal wellness goal of increasing their physical activity. Receiving cue-contingent financial incentives (i.e., incentives conditional on performing physical activity within ± one hour of a prespecified physical activity cue) combined with anchoring resulted in the highest daily step counts and greatest odds of temporally consistent walking during both the four-week intervention and the full eight-week study period. Cue-contingent financial incentives were also more successful at increasing physical activity and maintaining these effects post-intervention than traditional non-cue-contingent incentives. There were no differences in intrinsic motivation or habit strength between study groups at any time point. Financial incentives, particularly cue-contingent incentives, can be effectively used to support the anchoring intervention strategy for establishing physical activity habits. Moreover, mHealth apps are a feasible method for delivering the combined intervention technique of financial incentives with anchoring.
Collapse
|
5
|
Saccardo S, Dai H, Han MA, Vangala S, Hoo J, Fujimoto J. Field testing the transferability of behavioural science knowledge on promoting vaccinations. Nat Hum Behav 2024; 8:878-890. [PMID: 38486069 PMCID: PMC11132983 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01813-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
As behavioural science is increasingly adopted by organizations, there is a growing need to assess the robustness and transferability of empirical findings. Here, we investigate the transferability of insights from various sources of behavioural science knowledge to field settings. Across three pre-registered randomized controlled trials (RCTs, N = 314,824) involving a critical policy domain-COVID-19 booster uptake-we field tested text-based interventions that either increased vaccinations in prior field work (RCT1, NCT05586204), elevated vaccination intentions in an online study (RCT2, NCT05586178) or were favoured by scientists and non-experts (RCT3, NCT05586165). Despite repeated exposure to COVID-19 vaccination messaging in our population, reminders and psychological ownership language increased booster uptake, replicating prior findings. However, strategies deemed effective by prediction or intention surveys, such as encouraging the bundling of COVID-19 boosters and flu shots or addressing misconceptions, yielded no detectable benefits over simple reminders. These findings underscore the importance of testing interventions' transferability to real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Saccardo
- Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Hengchen Dai
- Anderson School of Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Maria A Han
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sitaram Vangala
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, Glendon Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Juyea Hoo
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Fujimoto
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cedars-Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clapp MA, Ray A, Liang P, James KE, Ganguli I, Cohen J. Increasing Postpartum Primary Care Engagement through Default Scheduling and Tailored Messaging : A Randomized Clinical Trial. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.01.21.24301585. [PMID: 38633772 PMCID: PMC11023680 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.21.24301585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Importance Over 30% of pregnant people have at least one chronic medical condition, and nearly 20% develop gestational diabetes or pregnancy-related hypertension, increasing the risk of future chronic disease. While these individuals are often monitored closely during pregnancy, they face significant barriers when transitioning to primary care following delivery, due in part to a lack of health care support for this transition. Objective To evaluate the impact of an intervention designed to improve postpartum primary care engagement by reducing patient administrative burden and information gaps. Design Individual-level randomized controlled trial conducted from November 3, 2022 to October 11, 2023. Setting One hospital-based and five community-based outpatient obstetric clinics affiliated with a large academic medical center. Participants Participants included English- and Spanish-speaking pregnant or recently postpartum adults with obesity, anxiety, depression, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, gestational diabetes, or pregnancy-related hypertension, and a primary care practitioner (PCP) listed in their electronic health record (EHR). Intervention A behavioral economics-informed intervention bundle, including default scheduling of postpartum PCP appointments and tailored messages. Main Outcome Completion of a PCP visit for routine or chronic condition care within 4 months of delivery. Results 360 patients were randomized (Control: N=176, Intervention: N=184). Individuals had mean (SD) age 34.1 (4.9) years and median gestational age of 36.3 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 34.0-38.6 weeks) at enrollment. The distribution of self-reported races was 7.4% Asian, 6.8% Black, 15.0% multiple races or "Other," and 68.6% White. Most (75.8%) participants had anxiety or depression, 15.9% had a chronic or pregnancy-related hypertensive disorder, 19.8% had pre-existing or gestational diabetes, and 40.4% had a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Medicaid was the primary payer for 21.9% of patients. PCP visit completion within 4 months occurred in 22.0% in the control group and 40.0% in the intervention group. In regression models accounting for randomization strata, the intervention increased PCP visit completion by 18.7 percentage points (95%CI 10.7-29.1). Intervention participants also had fewer postpartum readmissions (1.7 vs. 5.8%) and increased receipt of the following services by a PCP: blood pressure screening (42.8 vs. 28.3%), weight assessment (42.8 vs. 27.7%), and depression screening (32.8 vs. 16.8%). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized trial of pregnant individuals with or at risk for chronic health conditions, default PCP visit scheduling, tailored messages, and reminders substantially improved postpartum primary care engagement. The current lack of support for postpartum transitions to primary care is a missed opportunity to improve recently pregnant individual's short- and long-term health. Reducing patient administrative burdens may represent relatively low-resource, high-impact approaches to improving postpartum health and wellbeing. Trial Registration NCT05543265.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Clapp
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alaka Ray
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Kaitlyn E James
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ishani Ganguli
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Newman DB, Gordon AM, O'Bryan J, Mendes WB. Stress reduction experiments in daily life: Scaling from the lab to the world. J Exp Psychol Gen 2024; 153:1076-1092. [PMID: 38358707 PMCID: PMC11001525 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Paced breathing-longer exhalation than inhalation-can show short-term improvement of physiologic responses and affective well-being, though most studies have relied on narrow sample demographics, small samples, and control conditions that fail to address expectancy effects. We addressed these limitations through an app-based experiment where participants were randomly assigned to paced breathing or sham control (hand closure) conditions. We first validated the conditions in an online sample (N = 201; Study 1) and in a lab environment (N = 72; Study 2). In the primary app-based experiment, participants (N = 3,277; Study 3) completed 3 days of baseline assessments that included three check-ins each day in which we obtained heart rate and blood pressure responses using an optic sensor and assessed current stress and emotions. Participants were then randomly assigned to either the paced breathing or hand closure condition for the next 6 days. Relative to baseline days, both conditions were associated with increased positive emotions and perceived coping, and reduced blood pressure. Moreover, the increase in positive emotions and perceived coping was not evident among a comparison sample (N = 2,600) who completed check-ins but did not participate in either of the paced breathing or sham-control conditions. However, their blood pressure declined over time, suggesting that the continual monitoring of one's blood pressure may result in detectable decreases. Our results highlight the importance of designing experiments with appropriately matched control conditions and suggest that changes associated with techniques like paced breathing, in part, may stem from positive incidental features of the technique. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Newman
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University
| | | | - Julia O'Bryan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Medvedev D, Davenport D, Talhelm T, Li Y. The motivating effect of monetary over psychological incentives is stronger in WEIRD cultures. Nat Hum Behav 2024; 8:456-470. [PMID: 38191844 PMCID: PMC10963269 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01769-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Motivating effortful behaviour is a problem employers, governments and nonprofits face globally. However, most studies on motivation are done in Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic (WEIRD) cultures. We compared how hard people in six countries worked in response to monetary incentives versus psychological motivators, such as competing with or helping others. The advantage money had over psychological interventions was larger in the United States and the United Kingdom than in China, India, Mexico and South Africa (N = 8,133). In our last study, we randomly assigned cultural frames through language in bilingual Facebook users in India (N = 2,065). Money increased effort over a psychological treatment by 27% in Hindi and 52% in English. These findings contradict the standard economic intuition that people from poorer countries should be more driven by money. Instead, they suggest that the market mentality of exchanging time and effort for material benefits is most prominent in WEIRD cultures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danila Medvedev
- University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Diag Davenport
- Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Thomas Talhelm
- University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yin Li
- Yale University, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Noetel M, Sanders T, Gallardo-Gómez D, Taylor P, Del Pozo Cruz B, van den Hoek D, Smith JJ, Mahoney J, Spathis J, Moresi M, Pagano R, Pagano L, Vasconcellos R, Arnott H, Varley B, Parker P, Biddle S, Lonsdale C. Effect of exercise for depression: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2024; 384:e075847. [PMID: 38355154 PMCID: PMC10870815 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the optimal dose and modality of exercise for treating major depressive disorder, compared with psychotherapy, antidepressants, and control conditions. DESIGN Systematic review and network meta-analysis. METHODS Screening, data extraction, coding, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently and in duplicate. Bayesian arm based, multilevel network meta-analyses were performed for the primary analyses. Quality of the evidence for each arm was graded using the confidence in network meta-analysis (CINeMA) online tool. DATA SOURCES Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO databases. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Any randomised trial with exercise arms for participants meeting clinical cut-offs for major depression. RESULTS 218 unique studies with a total of 495 arms and 14 170 participants were included. Compared with active controls (eg, usual care, placebo tablet), moderate reductions in depression were found for walking or jogging (n=1210, κ=51, Hedges' g -0.62, 95% credible interval -0.80 to -0.45), yoga (n=1047, κ=33, g -0.55, -0.73 to -0.36), strength training (n=643, κ=22, g -0.49, -0.69 to -0.29), mixed aerobic exercises (n=1286, κ=51, g -0.43, -0.61 to -0.24), and tai chi or qigong (n=343, κ=12, g -0.42, -0.65 to -0.21). The effects of exercise were proportional to the intensity prescribed. Strength training and yoga appeared to be the most acceptable modalities. Results appeared robust to publication bias, but only one study met the Cochrane criteria for low risk of bias. As a result, confidence in accordance with CINeMA was low for walking or jogging and very low for other treatments. CONCLUSIONS Exercise is an effective treatment for depression, with walking or jogging, yoga, and strength training more effective than other exercises, particularly when intense. Yoga and strength training were well tolerated compared with other treatments. Exercise appeared equally effective for people with and without comorbidities and with different baseline levels of depression. To mitigate expectancy effects, future studies could aim to blind participants and staff. These forms of exercise could be considered alongside psychotherapy and antidepressants as core treatments for depression. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42018118040.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Noetel
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Taren Sanders
- Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Paul Taylor
- School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, NSW, Australia
| | - Borja Del Pozo Cruz
- Department of Clinical Biomechanics and Sports Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cádiz (INiBICA) Research Unit, University of Cádiz, Spain
| | - Daniel van den Hoek
- School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, QLD, Australia
| | - Jordan J Smith
- School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - John Mahoney
- School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, QLD, Australia
| | - Jemima Spathis
- School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark Moresi
- School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Pagano
- School of Education, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa Pagano
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | - Roberta Vasconcellos
- Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hugh Arnott
- Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Benjamin Varley
- Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip Parker
- Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stuart Biddle
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Sport and Health Science, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland
| | - Chris Lonsdale
- Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vlasceanu M, Doell KC, Bak-Coleman JB, Todorova B, Berkebile-Weinberg MM, Grayson SJ, Patel Y, Goldwert D, Pei Y, Chakroff A, Pronizius E, van den Broek KL, Vlasceanu D, Constantino S, Morais MJ, Schumann P, Rathje S, Fang K, Aglioti SM, Alfano M, Alvarado-Yepez AJ, Andersen A, Anseel F, Apps MAJ, Asadli C, Awuor FJ, Azevedo F, Basaglia P, Bélanger JJ, Berger S, Bertin P, Białek M, Bialobrzeska O, Blaya-Burgo M, Bleize DNM, Bø S, Boecker L, Boggio PS, Borau S, Bos B, Bouguettaya A, Brauer M, Brick C, Brik T, Briker R, Brosch T, Buchel O, Buonauro D, Butalia R, Carvacho H, Chamberlain SAE, Chan HY, Chow D, Chung D, Cian L, Cohen-Eick N, Contreras-Huerta LS, Contu D, Cristea V, Cutler J, D'Ottone S, De Keersmaecker J, Delcourt S, Delouvée S, Diel K, Douglas BD, Drupp MA, Dubey S, Ekmanis J, Elbaek CT, Elsherif M, Engelhard IM, Escher YA, Etienne TW, Farage L, Farias AR, Feuerriegel S, Findor A, Freira L, Friese M, Gains NP, Gallyamova A, Geiger SJ, Genschow O, Gjoneska B, Gkinopoulos T, Goldberg B, Goldenberg A, Gradidge S, Grassini S, Gray K, Grelle S, Griffin SM, Grigoryan L, Grigoryan A, Grigoryev D, Gruber J, Guilaran J, Hadar B, Hahnel UJ, Halperin E, Harvey AJ, Haugestad CAP, Herman AM, Hershfield HE, Himichi T, Hine DW, Hofmann W, Howe L, Huaman-Chulluncuy ET, Huang G, Ishii T, Ito A, Jia F, Jost JT, Jovanović V, Jurgiel D, Kácha O, Kankaanpää R, Kantorowicz J, Kantorowicz-Reznichenko E, Kaplan Mintz K, Kaya I, Kaya O, Khachatryan N, Klas A, Klein C, Klöckner CA, Koppel L, Kosachenko AI, Kothe EJ, Krebs R, Krosch AR, Krouwel AP, Kyrychenko Y, Lagomarsino M, Lamm C, Lange F, Lee Cunningham J, Lees J, Leung TY, Levy N, Lockwood PL, Longoni C, López Ortega A, Loschelder DD, Lu JG, Luo Y, Luomba J, Lutz AE, Majer JM, Markowitz E, Marsh AA, Mascarenhas KL, Mbilingi B, Mbungu W, McHugh C, Meijers MH, Mercier H, Mhagama FL, Michalakis K, Mikus N, Milliron S, Mitkidis P, Monge-Rodríguez FS, Mora YL, Moreau D, Motoki K, Moyano M, Mus M, Navajas J, Nguyen TL, Nguyen DM, Nguyen T, Niemi L, Nijssen SRR, Nilsonne G, Nitschke JP, Nockur L, Okura R, Öner S, Özdoğru AA, Palumbo H, Panagopoulos C, Panasiti MS, Pärnamets P, Paruzel-Czachura M, Pavlov YG, Payán-Gómez C, Pearson AR, Pereira da Costa L, Petrowsky HM, Pfattheicher S, Pham NT, Ponizovskiy V, Pretus C, Rêgo GG, Reimann R, Rhoads SA, Riano-Moreno J, Richter I, Röer JP, Rosa-Sullivan J, Ross RM, Sabherwal A, Saito T, Sarrasin O, Say N, Schmid K, Schmitt MT, Schoenegger P, Scholz C, Schug MG, Schulreich S, Shreedhar G, Shuman E, Sivan S, Sjåstad H, Soliman M, Soud K, Spampatti T, Sparkman G, Spasovski O, Stanley SK, Stern JA, Strahm N, Suko Y, Sul S, Syropoulos S, Taylor NC, Tedaldi E, Tinghög G, Huynh LDT, Travaglino GA, Tsakiris M, Tüter İ, Tyrala M, Uluğ ÖM, Urbanek A, Valko D, van der Linden S, van Schie K, van Stekelenburg A, Vanags E, Västfjäll D, Vesely S, Vintr J, Vranka M, Wanguche PO, Willer R, Wojcik AD, Xu R, Yadav A, Zawisza M, Zhao X, Zhao J, Żuk D, Van Bavel JJ. Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadj5778. [PMID: 38324680 PMCID: PMC10849597 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj5778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions' effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior-several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people's initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kimberly C. Doell
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria
| | - Joseph B. Bak-Coleman
- Craig Newmark Center for Journalism Ethics and Security, Columbia University, New York, NY 10018, USA
- Institute for Rebooting Social Media, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Boryana Todorova
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria
| | | | | | - Yash Patel
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Danielle Goldwert
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Yifei Pei
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | | | - Ekaterina Pronizius
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria
| | - Karlijn L. van den Broek
- Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CB, Netherlands
| | - Denisa Vlasceanu
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
| | - Sara Constantino
- School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Philipp Schumann
- Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg 26129, Germany
| | - Steve Rathje
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Ke Fang
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Salvatore Maria Aglioti
- Santa Lucia Foundation, IRCCS, Rome 179, Italy
- Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 185, Italy
| | - Mark Alfano
- Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
| | | | - Angélica Andersen
- Post-Graduation Program in Linguistics, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80060150, Brasil
| | - Frederik Anseel
- UNSW Business School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Matthew A. J. Apps
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Chillar Asadli
- Psychology Scientific Research Institute, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - Fonda Jane Awuor
- Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, Kisumu 1881-40100, Kenya
| | - Flavio Azevedo
- Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen 9712TS, Netherlands
| | - Piero Basaglia
- Department of Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg 20146, Germany
| | - Jocelyn J. Bélanger
- Department of Psychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates
| | - Sebastian Berger
- Department of Sociology, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland
| | - Paul Bertin
- LAPCOS, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice 6357, France
- Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels 1050, Belgium
| | - Michał Białek
- Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Historical and Pedagogical Sciences, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw 50-120, Poland
| | | | - Michelle Blaya-Burgo
- Department of Psychology, Division of Behavioral & Organizational Sciences, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, NH 91711, USA
| | | | - Simen Bø
- Department of Strategy and Management, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen 5045, Norway
| | - Lea Boecker
- Department of Economic Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental Methods, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg 21335, Germany
| | - Paulo S. Boggio
- Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Sao Paulo 1241001, Brazil
| | - Sylvie Borau
- Toulouse Business School, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse. Toulouse, 31000, France
| | - Björn Bos
- Department of Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg 20146, Hamburg
| | - Ayoub Bouguettaya
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Markus Brauer
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Cameron Brick
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1018 WT, Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum 2418, Norway
| | - Tymofii Brik
- Policy Research Department, Kyiv School of Economics, Kyiv 2000, Ukraine
| | - Roman Briker
- Department of Organisation, Strategy, and Entrepreneurship, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6211 LK, Netherlands
| | - Tobias Brosch
- Department of Psychology and Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1205, Switzerland
| | - Ondrej Buchel
- Institute for Sociology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava 81364, Slovakia
| | - Daniel Buonauro
- Psychological Science, Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711, USA
| | - Radhika Butalia
- Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven 3001, Belgium
| | - Héctor Carvacho
- Escuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Sarah A. E. Chamberlain
- School of Psychology, Speech, and Hearing, University of Canterbury, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8051, New Zealand
| | - Hang-Yee Chan
- Department of Marketing, King’s Business School, King’s College London, London WC2B 4BG, UK
| | - Dawn Chow
- Department of Management and Marketing, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Dongil Chung
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Luca Cian
- Department of Marketing, University of Virginia, Darden School of Business, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Noa Cohen-Eick
- Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel
- Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen 9712 CP, Netherlands
| | - Luis Sebastian Contreras-Huerta
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Viña del Mar, Chile
| | - Davide Contu
- Faculty of Management, Canadian University Dubai, Dubai 117781, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Jo Cutler
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Silvana D'Ottone
- Escuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile
| | - Jonas De Keersmaecker
- Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium
- Department of People Management and Organization, Esade Business School, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona 8034, Spain
| | - Sarah Delcourt
- Behavioral Economics and Engineering Group, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | | | - Kathi Diel
- Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany
| | - Benjamin D. Douglas
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Moritz A. Drupp
- Department of Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg 20146, Germany
- Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), University of Hamburg, Hamburg 20146, Germany
| | - Shreya Dubey
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1018WV, Netherlands
| | - Jānis Ekmanis
- Department of Psychology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | | | - Mahmoud Elsherif
- Department of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Department of Vision Science, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
| | - Iris M. Engelhard
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3508 TC, Netherlands
| | - Yannik A. Escher
- Institute of Management & Organization, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg 21335, Germany
| | - Tom W. Etienne
- Kieskompas–Election Compass, Amsterdam 1052XH, Netherlands
- Department of Political Science & Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Laura Farage
- Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Salzburg
| | - Ana Rita Farias
- HEI-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Labs, Lusófona University, Lisbon 1700, Portugal
| | - Stefan Feuerriegel
- School of Management, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich 80539, Germany
| | - Andrej Findor
- Institute of European Studies and International Relations, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava 82105, Slovakia
| | - Lucia Freira
- Laboratorio de Neurociencia, Escuela de Negocios, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires C1428, Argentina
| | - Malte Friese
- Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany
| | - Neil Philip Gains
- School of Global Studies, Thammasat University, Bangkok 12121, Thailand
| | - Albina Gallyamova
- Center for Sociocultural Research, HSE University, Moscow 101000, Russia
| | - Sandra J. Geiger
- Environmental Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna A-1010, Austria
| | - Oliver Genschow
- Institute for Management and Organization, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg 21335, Germany
| | - Biljana Gjoneska
- Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje 1000, North Macedonia
| | - Theofilos Gkinopoulos
- Faculty of Philosophy, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University, Krakow 30-060, Poland
| | | | - Amit Goldenberg
- Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 2163, USA
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 2138, USA
- Digital Data and Design Institute at Harvard, Harvard University, Allston, Boston, MA 2134, USA
| | - Sarah Gradidge
- School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
| | - Simone Grassini
- Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen 5007, Norway
- Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Stavanger, Stavanger 4021, Norway
| | - Kurt Gray
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Sonja Grelle
- Department of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum 44801, Germany
| | - Siobhán M. Griffin
- Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick V94T9PX, Ireland
| | | | - Ani Grigoryan
- Department of Personality Psychology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
| | - Dmitry Grigoryev
- Center for Sociocultural Research, HSE University, Moscow 101000, Russia
| | - June Gruber
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
| | - Johnrev Guilaran
- Division of Social Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Miagao 5023, Philippines
| | - Britt Hadar
- Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Reichman University, Herzliya 4610101, Israel
| | - Ulf J.J. Hahnel
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel 4055, Switzerland
| | - Eran Halperin
- Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel
| | - Annelie J. Harvey
- School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
| | | | - Aleksandra M. Herman
- Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw 02-093, Poland
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9RH, UK
| | - Hal E. Hershfield
- Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Toshiyuki Himichi
- School of Economics & Management, Kochi University of Technology, Kami City 782-8502, Japan
| | - Donald W. Hine
- School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8051, New Zealand
| | - Wilhelm Hofmann
- Department of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum 44801, Germany
| | - Lauren Howe
- Department of Business Administration, University of Zurich, Zurich 8032, Switzerland
| | | | - Guanxiong Huang
- Department of Media and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tatsunori Ishii
- Department of Psychology, Japan Women’s University, Tokyo 1128681, Japan
| | - Ayahito Ito
- Graduate School of Education, Tohoku University, Sendai 9808576, Japan
| | - Fanli Jia
- Department of Psychology, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ 7079, USA
| | - John T. Jost
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Veljko Jovanović
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
| | - Dominika Jurgiel
- Doctoral School of Social Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń 87-100, Poland
| | | | - Reeta Kankaanpää
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere 33100, Finland
- INVEST Research Flagship, University of Turku, Turku 20014, Finland
| | - Jaroslaw Kantorowicz
- Institute of Security and Global Affairs, Leiden University, The Hague 2511DP, Netherlands
| | | | - Keren Kaplan Mintz
- Shamir Research Institute, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel
- Department of Learning and Instructional Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, 3498838, Israel
| | - Ilker Kaya
- Deparment of Economics, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ozgur Kaya
- Deparment of Economics, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates
| | - Narine Khachatryan
- Department of Personality Psychology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
| | - Anna Klas
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia
| | - Colin Klein
- School of Philosophy, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
| | - Christian A. Klöckner
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7049, Norway
| | - Lina Koppel
- Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping 58183, Sweden
| | - Alexandra I. Kosachenko
- Academic and Research Laboratory of Neurotechnology, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg 620075, Russia
| | - Emily J. Kothe
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia
| | - Ruth Krebs
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium
| | - Amy R. Krosch
- Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
| | - Andre P.M. Krouwel
- Departments of Political Science and Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, Netherlands
| | - Yara Kyrychenko
- Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EL, UK
| | - Maria Lagomarsino
- Psychology of Sustainability and Behavior Change, University of Basel, Basel 4055, Switzerland
| | - Claus Lamm
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria
| | - Florian Lange
- Behavioral Economics and Engineering Group, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Julia Lee Cunningham
- Management & Organizations, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - Jeffrey Lees
- John E. Walker Department of Economics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
- Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 8544, USA
| | - Tak Yan Leung
- School of Business and Creative Industries, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, BNE 4556, Australia
| | - Neil Levy
- Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Patricia L. Lockwood
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Chiara Longoni
- Department of Marketing, Bocconi University, Milan 20136, Italy
| | - Alberto López Ortega
- Department of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, Netherlands
| | - David D. Loschelder
- Institute of Management and Organization, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lueneburg 21337, Germany
| | - Jackson G. Lu
- MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 2139, USA
| | - Yu Luo
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Joseph Luomba
- Tanzanian Fisheries Research Institute, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Annika E. Lutz
- Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Johann M. Majer
- Department of Social, Organizational, & Economic Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim 31141, Germany
| | - Ezra Markowitz
- Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 1003, USA
| | - Abigail A. Marsh
- Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - Karen Louise Mascarenhas
- Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Innovation (RCGI), University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil
- Department of Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil
| | | | - Winfred Mbungu
- Department of Civil and Water Resources Engineering School of Engineering and Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania
| | - Cillian McHugh
- Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland
| | - Marijn H.C. Meijers
- Department of Communication Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1001 NG, Netherlands
| | - Hugo Mercier
- Institut Jean Nicod, Département d’études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRS, Paris 75005, France
| | | | | | - Nace Mikus
- School of Culture and Society–Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
- Neuropsychopharmacology and Biopsychology Unit, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria
| | - Sarah Milliron
- Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
| | | | | | - Youri L. Mora
- Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique, Brussels 1050, Belgium
- Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels 1312, Belgium
| | - David Moreau
- School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
| | - Kosuke Motoki
- Department of Management, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan
| | - Manuel Moyano
- Department of Psychology, University of Cordoba, Cordoba 14071, Spain
| | - Mathilde Mus
- Département d’études cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRS, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan
| | - Joaquin Navajas
- Comisión Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Laboratorio de Neurociencia, Escuela de Negocios, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires C1428 CABA, Argentina
| | | | - Dung Minh Nguyen
- College of Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 800, Taiwan
| | - Trieu Nguyen
- College of Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 800, Taiwan
| | - Laura Niemi
- Department of Psychology and Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
| | - Sari R. R. Nijssen
- Environmental Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria
| | - Gustav Nilsonne
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17177, Sweden
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm 11419, Sweden
| | - Jonas P. Nitschke
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria
| | - Laila Nockur
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
| | - Ritah Okura
- National Fisheries Resources Research Institute, Jinja, Uganda
| | - Sezin Öner
- Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, İstanbul 34083, Turkey
| | - Asil Ali Özdoğru
- Department of Psychology, Marmara University, İstanbul 34722, Turkey
- Department of Psychology, Üsküdar University, İstanbul 34662, Turkey
| | - Helena Palumbo
- Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona 8005, Spain
| | - Costas Panagopoulos
- Department of Political Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 2115, USA
| | - Maria Serena Panasiti
- Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 185, Italy
- IRCCS, Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome 142, Italy
| | - Philip Pärnamets
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden
| | - Mariola Paruzel-Czachura
- Penn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice 40-007, Poland
| | - Yuri G. Pavlov
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen 72076, Germany
| | - César Payán-Gómez
- Dirección Académica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede de La Paz, Cesar, Colombia
| | - Adam R. Pearson
- Psychological Science, Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711, USA
| | | | - Hannes M. Petrowsky
- Institute of Management and Organization, Leuphana University Lueneburg, Lueneburg 21337, Germany
| | - Stefan Pfattheicher
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
| | - Nhat Tan Pham
- School of Business, International University, Vietnam National University HCMC, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
| | | | - Clara Pretus
- Department of Psychobioloogy and Methodology of Heath Sciences, Universitat Autònima de Barcelona, Barcelona 8193, Spain
| | - Gabriel G. Rêgo
- Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo 01221-040, Brazil
| | - Ritsaart Reimann
- Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Shawn A. Rhoads
- Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington DC, 20057, USA
- Center for Computational Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Julian Riano-Moreno
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Villavicencio, Colombia
| | - Isabell Richter
- Department of Psychology, Faculty for Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway
| | - Jan Philipp Röer
- Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten 58455, Germany
| | - Jahred Rosa-Sullivan
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Robert M. Ross
- Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Anandita Sabherwal
- Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Toshiki Saito
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo 1020083, Japan
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 1658555, Japan
| | - Oriane Sarrasin
- Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Say
- Department of Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague 13067, Czech Republic
| | - Katharina Schmid
- Department of People Management and Organization, Universitat Ramon Llull, Esade Business School, Barcelona 8034, Spain
| | - Michael T. Schmitt
- Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Philipp Schoenegger
- School of Economics & Finance, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, UK
- School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studies, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, UK
| | - Christin Scholz
- Department of Communication, Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1018WV, Netherlands
| | - Mariah G. Schug
- Department of Psychology, Widener University, Chester 19013, USA
| | - Stefan Schulreich
- Department of Cognitive Psychology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg 20146, Germany
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Ganga Shreedhar
- Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Eric Shuman
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
- Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 2163, USA
| | - Smadar Sivan
- Department of Social Psychology, Reichman University (RUNI), Herzliya 4610101, Israel
| | - Hallgeir Sjåstad
- Department of Strategy and Management, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen 5045, Norway
| | - Meikel Soliman
- Research Center for Digital Transformation, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg 21335, Germany
| | - Katia Soud
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
- Danish Research Institute of Translational Neuroscience (DANDRITE), Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
| | - Tobia Spampatti
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1205, Switzerland
- Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1205, Switzerland
| | - Gregg Sparkman
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 2467, USA
| | - Ognen Spasovski
- Faculty of Philosophy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje 1000, Republic of North Macedonia
- Faculty of Philosophy, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Trnava 917 01, Slovakia
| | - Samantha K. Stanley
- School of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 200, Australia
| | - Jessica A. Stern
- Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22902, USA
| | - Noel Strahm
- Department of Sociology, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland
| | - Yasushi Suko
- Faculty of Social Sciences/Psychology, Tampere University, Tampere FI-33014, Finland
| | - Sunhae Sul
- Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
| | - Stylianos Syropoulos
- Psychology and Neuroscience, Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society, Boston College, Brighton, MA 2135, USA
| | - Neil C. Taylor
- UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia
| | - Elisa Tedaldi
- Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialisation, University of Padova, Padua 35131, Italy
| | - Gustav Tinghög
- Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping 58183, Sweden
| | - Luu Duc Toan Huynh
- School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
| | - Giovanni Antonio Travaglino
- Institute for the Study of Power, Crime, and Society | Department of Law & Criminology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW200EX, UK
| | | | - İlayda Tüter
- Department of Psychology, Üsküdar University, Istanbul 34664, Turkey
| | - Michael Tyrala
- Department of Public and International Affairs, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong
| | | | - Arkadiusz Urbanek
- Institute of Pedagogy, Faculty of Historical and Pedagogical Sciences, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw 50-120, Poland
| | - Danila Valko
- Research Department, The South Ural University of Technology, Chelyabinsk 454052, Russia
- Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Space Studies, School for Environmental and Social Studies, Tyumen State University, Tyumen 625003, Russia
| | | | - Kevin van Schie
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg 5037 AB, Netherlands
| | | | - Edmunds Vanags
- Department of Psychology, University of Latvia, Riga 1083, Latvia
| | - Daniel Västfjäll
- Division of Psychology, Linköping University, Linköping 58183, Sweden
| | - Stepan Vesely
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7049, Norway
| | | | - Marek Vranka
- Department of Marketing Communication and Public Relations, Charles University, Prague 11000, Czech Republic
| | | | - Robb Willer
- Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Adrian Dominik Wojcik
- Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń 87-100, Poland
| | - Rachel Xu
- Jigsaw, Google, New York, NY 10011, USA
| | - Anjali Yadav
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Climate and Energy Policy Research Lab, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
- School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia
| | - Magdalena Zawisza
- School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
| | - Xian Zhao
- Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Jiaying Zhao
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Dawid Żuk
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw 00-183, Poland
| | - Jay J. Van Bavel
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
- Department of Strategy and Management, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen 5045, Norway
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chu JY, Voelkel JG, Stagnaro MN, Kang S, Druckman JN, Rand DG, Willer R. Academics are more specific, and practitioners more sensitive, in forecasting interventions to strengthen democratic attitudes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2307008121. [PMID: 38215187 PMCID: PMC10801850 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2307008121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Concern over democratic erosion has led to a proliferation of proposed interventions to strengthen democratic attitudes in the United States. Resource constraints, however, prevent implementing all proposed interventions. One approach to identify promising interventions entails leveraging domain experts, who have knowledge regarding a given field, to forecast the effectiveness of candidate interventions. We recruit experts who develop general knowledge about a social problem (academics), experts who directly intervene on the problem (practitioners), and nonexperts from the public to forecast the effectiveness of interventions to reduce partisan animosity, support for undemocratic practices, and support for partisan violence. Comparing 14,076 forecasts submitted by 1,181 forecasters against the results of a megaexperiment (n = 32,059) that tested 75 hypothesized effects of interventions, we find that both types of experts outperformed members of the public, though experts differed in how they were accurate. While academics' predictions were more specific (i.e., they identified a larger proportion of ineffective interventions and had fewer false-positive forecasts), practitioners' predictions were more sensitive (i.e., they identified a larger proportion of effective interventions and had fewer false-negative forecasts). Consistent with this, practitioners were better at predicting best-performing interventions, while academics were superior in predicting which interventions performed worst. Our paper highlights the importance of differentiating types of experts and types of accuracy. We conclude by discussing factors that affect whether sensitive or specific forecasters are preferable, such as the relative cost of false positives and negatives and the expected rate of intervention success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Y. Chu
- Department of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, NY10027
| | - Jan G. Voelkel
- Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA94305
| | - Michael N. Stagnaro
- Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
| | - Suji Kang
- Perry World House, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA19104
| | - James N. Druckman
- Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY14627
| | - David G. Rand
- Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
| | - Robb Willer
- Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA94305
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tkachenko Y, Jedidi K. A megastudy on the predictability of personal information from facial images: Disentangling demographic and non-demographic signals. Sci Rep 2023; 13:21073. [PMID: 38030632 PMCID: PMC10687237 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42054-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
While prior research has shown that facial images signal personal information, publications in this field tend to assess the predictability of a single variable or a small set of variables at a time, which is problematic. Reported prediction quality is hard to compare and generalize across studies due to different study conditions. Another issue is selection bias: researchers may choose to study variables intuitively expected to be predictable and underreport unpredictable variables (the 'file drawer' problem). Policy makers thus have an incomplete picture for a risk-benefit analysis of facial analysis technology. To address these limitations, we perform a megastudy-a survey-based study that reports the predictability of numerous personal attributes (349 binary variables) from 2646 distinct facial images of 969 individuals. Using deep learning, we find 82/349 personal attributes (23%) are predictable better than random from facial image pixels. Adding facial images substantially boosts prediction quality versus demographics-only benchmark model. Our unexpected finding of strong predictability of iPhone versus Galaxy preference variable shows how testing many hypotheses simultaneously can facilitate knowledge discovery. Our proposed L1-regularized image decomposition method and other techniques point to smartphone camera artifacts, BMI, skin properties, and facial hair as top candidate non-demographic signals in facial images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yegor Tkachenko
- Marketing Department, Columbia Business School, New York, 10027, USA.
| | - Kamel Jedidi
- Marketing Department, Columbia Business School, New York, 10027, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Snuggs S, Clot S, Lamport D, Sah A, Forrest J, Helme Guizon A, Kaur A, Iqbal Z, Caldara C, Wilhelm MC, Anin C, Vogt J. A mixed-methods approach to understanding barriers and facilitators to healthy eating and exercise from five European countries: highlighting the roles of enjoyment, emotion and social engagement. Psychol Health 2023:1-28. [PMID: 37933459 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2274045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Healthy adults are consistently falling below national and international recommendations for physical activity and dietary intake across Europe. This study took a co-creative approach with adult samples from five European countries to qualitatively and quantitatively establish motivators, barriers and sustaining factors for positive health behaviour change. Stage 1 delivered a newly-designed online programme, creating a community who identified challenges, motivators and solutions to sustaining positive healthy eating and physical activity behaviours. Stage 2 administered an online survey (developed from Stage 1 findings) to a larger sample to quantify the relative importance of these motivators and barriers. Results from both stages indicated enjoyment, positive emotions, and reward as key motivators for both behaviours across all five countries. Barriers included habit-breaking difficulties, temptation and negative affective states. Those with a high BMI placed more importance on social pressure than those with healthy BMI. Participants' reports of motivators and barriers reflected relevant approaches from consumer science, behavioural economics, and psychology. Interventions supporting adults who are not chronically ill but would benefit from improved diet and/or physical activity should not focus exclusively on health as a motivating factor. Emphasis on enjoyable behaviours, social engagement and reward will likely improve engagement and sustained behaviour change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Snuggs
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Sophie Clot
- Department of Economics, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Daniel Lamport
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Anumeha Sah
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Joseph Forrest
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | | | - Amanpreet Kaur
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Zara Iqbal
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Cindy Caldara
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CERAG, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Camille Anin
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CERAG, Grenoble, France
| | - Julia Vogt
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Paley A, van de Ven N. Crowdsourcing as a tool for creating effective nudges: An example for financial oversubscription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2308129120. [PMID: 37871209 PMCID: PMC10622905 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2308129120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Creating effective nudges, or interventions that encourage people to make choices that increase their welfare, is difficult to execute well. Recent work on megastudies, massive field experiments that test many interventions simultaneously, reveals that nudge effectiveness both varies widely and is difficult for experts to predict. We propose an Iterative Crowdsourcing Procedure, which uses insights from members of the target population to generate and preselect nudges prior to testing them in a field experiment. This technique can supplement existing methods or stand alone as a way to generate conditions for testing in a high-quality field experiment. We test the effectiveness of this method in addressing a challenge to effective financial management: consumer oversubscription. We first document that people have more subscriptions than they think they have and that enhancing subscription awareness makes people want to cancel some subscriptions. We then use our crowdsourcing procedure to motivate people toward subscription awareness in a field experiment (N = 4,412,113) with a large bank. We find that the crowdsourced nudges outperform those generated by the bank, demonstrating that the Iterative Crowdsourcing Procedure is a useful way to generate effective nudges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Paley
- Department of Marketing, Tilburg University, 5037AB Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Niels van de Ven
- Department of Marketing, Tilburg University, 5037AB Tilburg, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ispoglou T, Wilson O, McCullough D, Aldrich L, Ferentinos P, Lyall G, Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou A, Duckworth L, Brown MA, Sutton L, Potts AJ, Archbold V, Hargreaves J, McKenna J. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Strategies for Managing Sarcopenia in Older Adults with Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases. BIOLOGY 2023; 12:892. [PMID: 37508325 PMCID: PMC10376679 DOI: 10.3390/biology12070892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
This narrative review examines the mechanisms underlying the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and metabolic diseases (MDs), along with their association with sarcopenia. Furthermore, non-pharmacological interventions to address sarcopenia in patients with these conditions are suggested. The significance of combined training in managing metabolic disease and secondary sarcopenia in type II diabetes mellitus is emphasized. Additionally, the potential benefits of resistance and aerobic training are explored. This review emphasises the role of nutrition in addressing sarcopenia in patients with CVD or MDs, focusing on strategies such as optimising protein intake, promoting plant-based protein sources, incorporating antioxidant-rich foods and omega-3 fatty acids and ensuring sufficient vitamin D levels. Moreover, the potential benefits of targeting gut microbiota through probiotics and prebiotic fibres in sarcopenic individuals are considered. Multidisciplinary approaches that integrate behavioural science are explored to enhance the uptake and sustainability of behaviour-based sarcopenia interventions. Future research should prioritise high-quality randomized controlled trials to refine exercise and nutritional interventions and investigate the incorporation of behavioural science into routine practices. Ultimately, a comprehensive and multifaceted approach is essential to improve health outcomes, well-being and quality of life in older adults with sarcopenia and coexisting cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oliver Wilson
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QQ, UK
| | | | - Luke Aldrich
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QQ, UK
| | | | - Gemma Lyall
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QQ, UK
| | | | - Lauren Duckworth
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QQ, UK
| | - Meghan A Brown
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QQ, UK
| | - Louise Sutton
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QQ, UK
| | - Alexandra J Potts
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QQ, UK
| | - Victoria Archbold
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QQ, UK
| | - Jackie Hargreaves
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QQ, UK
| | - Jim McKenna
- Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baumgartner HA, Alessandroni N, Byers-Heinlein K, Frank MC, Hamlin JK, Soderstrom M, Voelkel JG, Willer R, Yuen F, Coles NA. How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2023; 10:230235. [PMID: 37293356 PMCID: PMC10245199 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The past decade has witnessed a proliferation of big team science (BTS), endeavours where a comparatively large number of researchers pool their intellectual and/or material resources in pursuit of a common goal. Despite this burgeoning interest, there exists little guidance on how to create, manage and participate in these collaborations. In this paper, we integrate insights from a multi-disciplinary set of BTS initiatives to provide a how-to guide for BTS. We first discuss initial considerations for launching a BTS project, such as building the team, identifying leadership, governance, tools and open science approaches. We then turn to issues related to running and completing a BTS project, such as study design, ethical approvals and issues related to data collection, management and analysis. Finally, we address topics that present special challenges for BTS, including authorship decisions, collaborative writing and team decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi A. Baumgartner
- Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Michael C. Frank
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - J. Kiley Hamlin
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Melanie Soderstrom
- Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jan G. Voelkel
- Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Robb Willer
- Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Francis Yuen
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nicholas A. Coles
- Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Białek M. Why Should We Study the Foreign Language Effect: Debiasing through Affecting Metacognition? J Intell 2023; 11:103. [PMID: 37367505 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence11060103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Debiasing is a method of improving people's decisions by reducing their reliance on salient intuitions causing them to behave suboptimally or biasedly. However, many of the known debiasing techniques have limited effectiveness or can only remedy a one-shot decision, rather than having a lasting impact. In this work, I focus on the role of metacognition in debiasing decision-making and discuss how it can be better understood through the lens of the foreign language effect. The foreign language effect suggests that using a foreign language can sometimes benefit people's decision-making without providing them with additional information or instructions regarding the task. However, we do not fully understand how the foreign language effect works and its limitations. I conclude by urging scientists to research this effect with the hope of having a lasting positive impact on society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michał Białek
- Psychology of Management Unit, Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, 50-527 Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tang LH, Doherty P, Skou ST, Harrison A. Optimal outcomes from cardiac rehabilitation are associated with longer-term follow-up and risk factor status at 12 months: An observational registry-based study. Int J Cardiol 2023:S0167-5273(23)00720-9. [PMID: 37201610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM The purpose of Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) is to promote and reduce risk factors in the short and long term, however, the latter has, to date, been poorly evaluated. We explored characteristics associated with provision and outcomes of a long-term assessment in CR. METHOD Data from the UK National Audit of CR between April 2015 and March 2020 was used. Programmes were selected if they had an established mechanism and routine methodology to collect the 12-month assessments. Risk factors pre and post phase II CR and at the 12-month assessment were explored; BMI ≤30, ≥150 min of physical activity per week, hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) scores <8. The data came from 32 programmes, 24,644 patients with coronary heart disease. Patients being in at least one optimal risk factor stage throughout phase II CR (OR = 1.43 95% CI 1.28 to 1.59) or successfully reaching an optimal stage during phase II CR (OR = 1.61 95% CI 1.44 to 1.80) had an increased likelihood of being assessed at 12 months compared to those who did not. Patients being in the optimal stage upon completion of phase II CR had an increased likelihood of still being in the optimal stage at 12 months. Most prominent was BMI; (OR = 14.6 (95% CI 11.1 to 19.2) for patients reaching an optimal stage throughout phase II CR. CONCLUSION Being in an optimal stage upon routine CR completion could be an overlooked predictor in the provision of a long-term CR service and prediction of longer-term risk factor status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Hermann Tang
- The Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Denmark; The Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark & Department of Health Sciences, University of York, England, United Kingdom.
| | - Patrick Doherty
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, England, United Kingdom
| | - Søren T Skou
- The Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Denmark; Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Alexander Harrison
- The Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, England, United Kingdom; Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Denmark; The Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Health Sciences, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Buyalskaya A, Ho H, Milkman KL, Li X, Duckworth AL, Camerer C. What can machine learning teach us about habit formation? Evidence from exercise and hygiene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2216115120. [PMID: 37068252 PMCID: PMC10151500 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2216115120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
We apply a machine learning technique to characterize habit formation in two large panel data sets with objective measures of 1) gym attendance (over 12 million observations) and 2) hospital handwashing (over 40 million observations). Our Predicting Context Sensitivity (PCS) approach identifies context variables that best predict behavior for each individual. This approach also creates a time series of overall predictability for each individual. These time series predictability values are used to trace a habit formation curve for each individual, operationalizing the time of habit formation as the asymptotic limit of when behavior becomes highly predictable. Contrary to the popular belief in a "magic number" of days to develop a habit, we find that it typically takes months to form the habit of going to the gym but weeks to develop the habit of handwashing in the hospital. Furthermore, we find that gymgoers who are more predictable are less responsive to an intervention designed to promote more gym attendance, consistent with past experiments showing that habit formation generates insensitivity to reward devaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hung Ho
- Department of Marketing, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL60637
| | - Katherine L. Milkman
- Operations, Information and Decisions Department, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA19104
| | - Xiaomin Li
- Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA91125
| | - Angela L. Duckworth
- Operations, Information and Decisions Department, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA19104
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA19104
| | - Colin Camerer
- Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA91125
- Computational and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA91125
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lewańczyk AM, Langham-Walsh E, Edwards L, Branney P, Walters ER, Mitchell P, Vaportzis E. Back Onside protocol: A physical activity intervention to improve health outcomes in people who are unemployed or at risk of unemployment. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING 2023; 97:102204. [PMID: 36529025 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Given the effects of physical activity on people's mental and physical health, a better understanding is needed of how physical activity interventions may impact the health of people who are unemployed or at risk of unemployment. This has added urgency in the context of rising rates of poverty-related unemployment in the UK in 2022. The current paper details the protocol used in the evaluation of the Back Onside Programme; a community-based programme delivered by the Bradford Bulls Foundation in the Bradford District. The Programme supports people from low socio-economic backgrounds who are unemployed or at risk of unemployment to maintain regular physical activity through a ten-week physical activity intervention. This pilot study evaluates how a physical activity intervention may impact the mental and physical health of people who are unemployed or at risk of unemployment in an uncontrolled pragmatic pilot study. Four cohorts run back-to-back between May 2021 and May 2022, with separate groups for men (N = 100) and women (N = 60). Physical and wellbeing assessment at baseline and post-intervention is conducted. If the intervention works in this context for these individuals, it will be a promising low-cost community-based intervention for people who are unemployed or at risk of unemployment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa Edwards
- University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Peter Branney
- University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Elizabeth R Walters
- University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Eleftheria Vaportzis
- University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Patel MS, Milkman KL, Gandhi L, Graci HN, Gromet D, Ho H, Kay JS, Lee TW, Rothschild J, Akinola M, Beshears J, Bogard JE, Buttenheim A, Chabris C, Chapman GB, Choi JJ, Dai H, Fox CR, Goren A, Hilchey MD, Hmurovic J, John LK, Karlan D, Kim M, Laibson D, Lamberton C, Madrian BC, Meyer MN, Modanu M, Nam J, Rogers T, Rondina R, Saccardo S, Shermohammed M, Soman D, Sparks J, Warren C, Weber M, Berman R, Evans CN, Lee SH, Snider CK, Tsukayama E, Van den Bulte C, Volpp KG, Duckworth AL. A Randomized Trial of Behavioral Nudges Delivered Through Text Messages to Increase Influenza Vaccination Among Patients With an Upcoming Primary Care Visit. Am J Health Promot 2023; 37:324-332. [PMID: 36195982 PMCID: PMC10798571 DOI: 10.1177/08901171221131021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate if nudges delivered by text message prior to an upcoming primary care visit can increase influenza vaccination rates. DESIGN Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING Two health systems in the Northeastern US between September 2020 and March 2021. SUBJECTS 74,811 adults. INTERVENTIONS Patients in the 19 intervention arms received 1-2 text messages in the 3 days preceding their appointment that varied in their format, interactivity, and content. MEASURES Influenza vaccination. ANALYSIS Intention-to-treat. RESULTS Participants had a mean (SD) age of 50.7 (16.2) years; 55.8% (41,771) were female, 70.6% (52,826) were White, and 19.0% (14,222) were Black. Among the interventions, 5 of 19 (26.3%) had a significantly greater vaccination rate than control. On average, the 19 interventions increased vaccination relative to control by 1.8 percentage points or 6.1% (P = .005). The top performing text message described the vaccine to the patient as "reserved for you" and led to a 3.1 percentage point increase (95% CI, 1.3 to 4.9; P < .001) in vaccination relative to control. Three of the top five performing messages described the vaccine as "reserved for you." None of the interventions performed worse than control. CONCLUSIONS Text messages encouraging vaccination and delivered prior to an upcoming appointment significantly increased influenza vaccination rates and could be a scalable approach to increase vaccination more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitesh S. Patel
- Department of Clinical Transformation and Behavioral Insights, Ascension, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Katherine L. Milkman
- Department of Operations, Information and Decisions, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Linnea Gandhi
- Department of Operations, Information and Decisions, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Heather N. Graci
- Behavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dena Gromet
- Behavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hung Ho
- Department of Marketing, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joseph S. Kay
- Behavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Timothy W. Lee
- School of Professional Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Jake Rothschild
- Behavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Modupe Akinola
- Department of Management, Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Beshears
- Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan E. Bogard
- Department of Behavioral Decision Making, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alison Buttenheim
- Department of Family and Community Health, The University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher Chabris
- Behavioral and Decision Sciences Program, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Gretchen B. Chapman
- Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James J. Choi
- Department of Finance, Yale School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Hengchen Dai
- Department of Management and Organization, Anderson School of Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Craig R. Fox
- Department of Management and Organization, Anderson School of Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amir Goren
- Behavioral Insights Team, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Matthew D. Hilchey
- Department of Behavioural Science and Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jillian Hmurovic
- Department of Marketing, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Leslie K. John
- Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dean Karlan
- Department of Finance, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Melanie Kim
- Department of Behavioural Science and Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Laibson
- Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cait Lamberton
- Department of Marketing, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Brigitte C. Madrian
- Department of Finance, Marriott School of Business, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Michelle N. Meyer
- Behavioral and Decision Sciences Program, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Maria Modanu
- Department of Management, Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jimin Nam
- Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Todd Rogers
- Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Renante Rondina
- Department of Behavioural Science and Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Silvia Saccardo
- Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Maheen Shermohammed
- Behavioral and Decision Sciences Program, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Dilip Soman
- Department of Behavioural Science and Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jehan Sparks
- Department of Behavioral Decision Making, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Caleb Warren
- Department of Marketing, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Megan Weber
- Department of Behavioral Decision Making, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ron Berman
- Department of Marketing, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chalanda N. Evans
- Center for Digital Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Seung Hyeong Lee
- Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher K. Snider
- Center for Health Care Innovation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Eli Tsukayama
- Business Administration Division, University of Hawaiì-West Òahu, Kapolei, HI, USA
| | | | - Kevin G. Volpp
- Penn Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Departments of Medical Ethics and Health Policy and Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Angela L. Duckworth
- Department of Operations, Information and Decisions, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kubzansky LD, Kim ES, Boehm JK, Davidson RJ, Huffman JC, Loucks EB, Lyubomirsky S, Picard RW, Schueller SM, Trudel-Fitzgerald C, VanderWeele TJ, Warran K, Yeager DS, Yeh CS, Moskowitz JT. Interventions to Modify Psychological Well-Being: Progress, Promises, and an Agenda for Future Research. AFFECTIVE SCIENCE 2023; 4:174-184. [PMID: 37064816 PMCID: PMC9982781 DOI: 10.1007/s42761-022-00167-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Psychological well-being, characterized by feelings, cognitions, and strategies that are associated with positive functioning (including hedonic and eudaimonic well-being), has been linked with better physical health and greater longevity. Importantly, psychological well-being can be strengthened with interventions, providing a strategy for improving population health. But are the effects of well-being interventions meaningful, durable, and scalable enough to improve health at a population-level? To assess this possibility, a cross-disciplinary group of scholars convened to review current knowledge and develop a research agenda. Here we summarize and build on the key insights from this convening, which were: (1) existing interventions should continue to be adapted to achieve a large-enough effect to result in downstream improvements in psychological functioning and health, (2) research should determine the durability of interventions needed to drive population-level and lasting changes, (3) a shift from individual-level care and treatment to a public-health model of population-level prevention is needed and will require new infrastructure that can deliver interventions at scale, (4) interventions should be accessible and effective in racially, ethnically, and geographically diverse samples. A discussion examining the key future research questions follows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D. Kubzansky
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| | - Eric S. Kim
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Julia K. Boehm
- Department of Psychology, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA USA
| | | | - Jeffrey C. Huffman
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Eric B. Loucks
- Department of Epidemiology, Mindfulness Center, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI USA
| | - Sonja Lyubomirsky
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA USA
| | | | - Stephen M. Schueller
- Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
| | - Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald
- Department of Psychology, Université du Québec À Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
- Research Center, Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Tyler J. VanderWeele
- Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
- Human Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Katey Warran
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, WHO Collaborating Centre for Arts & Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - David S. Yeager
- Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX USA
| | | | - Judith T. Moskowitz
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Abstract
A considerable amount of human behavior occurs within the context of sports. In recent years there have been notable advances in psychological science research applied to understanding athletic endeavor. This work has utilized a number of novel theoretical, methodological, and data analytic approaches. We review the current evidence related to developmental considerations, intrapersonal athlete factors, group processes, and the role of the coach in explaining how athletes function within the sport domain. This body of work sheds light on the diverse ways in which psychological processes contribute to athletic strivings. It also has the potential to spark interest in domains of psychology concerned with achievement as well as to encourage cross-domain fertilization of ideas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R Beauchamp
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;
| | - Alan Kingstone
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;
| | - Nikos Ntoumanis
- Danish Centre for Motivation and Behaviour Science, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark;
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van der Swaluw K, Hiemstra M, Lambooij M, Roordink E, van der Vliet N, Zantinge E, Proper K, Zeelenberg M, Prast HM. Lottery incentives for smoking cessation at the workplace: design and protocol of the smoke-free lottery - a cluster randomized trial. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:76. [PMID: 36627613 PMCID: PMC9831882 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14915-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking is the leading behavioral risk factor for the loss of healthy life years. Many smokers want to quit, but have trouble doing so. Financial incentives in workplace settings have shown promising results in supporting smokers and their design influences their impact. Lotteries that leverage behavioral economic insights might improve the effectiveness of workplace cessation support. METHODS AND DESIGN We examine in a cluster randomized trial if a workplace cessation group training paired with lottery deadlines will increase continuous abstinence rates over and above the cessation training alone. Organizations are randomized to either the control arm or lottery arm. The lotteries capitalize regret aversion by always informing winners at the deadline, but withholding prizes if they smoked. In the lottery-arm, winners are drawn out of all participants within a training group, regardless of their smoking status. In weeks 1-13 there are weekly lotteries. Winners are informed about their prize (€50), but can only claim it if they did not smoke that week, validated biochemically. After 26 weeks, there is a long-term lottery where the winners are informed about their prize (vacation voucher worth €400), but can only claim it if they were abstinent between weeks 13 and 26. The primary outcome is continuous abstinence 52 weeks after the quit date. DISCUSSION There is a quest for incentives to support smoking cessation that are considered fair, affordable and effective across different socioeconomic groups. Previous use of behavioral economics in the design of lotteries have shown promising results in changing health behavior. This cluster randomized trial aims to demonstrate if these lotteries are also effective for supporting smoking cessation. Therefore the study design and protocol are described in detail in this paper. Findings might contribute to the application and development of effective cessation support at the workplace. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register Identifier: NL8463 . Date of registration: 17-03-2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen van der Swaluw
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands ,grid.5590.90000000122931605Department of Economics and Business Economics, Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University, 6500 HK Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Hiemstra
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Mattijs Lambooij
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Roordink
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Nina van der Vliet
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands ,grid.12295.3d0000 0001 0943 3265Tilburg University Graduate School, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Else Zantinge
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Health and Society, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Proper
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Zeelenberg
- grid.12295.3d0000 0001 0943 3265Tilburg University, Department of Social Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands ,grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227VU Amsterdam, Department of Marketing, School of Business and Economics, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henriette M. Prast
- grid.12295.3d0000 0001 0943 3265Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands ,grid.465164.40000 0004 0621 2610Dutch Senate, 2500 EA Den Haag, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yu L, Qiao J, Ming WK, Wu Y. Megastudies: A New Approach to Reducing Vaccine Hesitation Worldwide. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11010133. [PMID: 36679978 PMCID: PMC9865671 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11010133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy is a considerable obstacle to achieving vaccine protection worldwide. There needs to be more evidence-based research for interventions for vaccine hesitancy. Existing effectiveness evaluations are limited to one particular hypothesis, and no studies have compared the effectiveness of different interventions. A megastudy takes a large-scale, multi-intervention, uniform participant and the same evaluation criteria approach to evaluate many interventions simultaneously and find the most effective ones. Therefore, megastudies can help us find the most effective interventions for vaccine hesitancy. Additionally, considering the complex causes of vaccine hesitancy, we design interventions that involve social factors in megastudies. Lastly, quality control and justice are critical issues for megastudies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lian Yu
- Health Care System Reform and Development Institute, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
| | - Jiaqi Qiao
- Jinhe Center for Economic Research, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
| | - Wai-Kit Ming
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
- Correspondence: (W.-K.M.); (Y.W.); Tel.: +85-234-426-956 (W.-K.M.); +861-881-016-9630 (Y.W.)
| | - Yibo Wu
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
- Correspondence: (W.-K.M.); (Y.W.); Tel.: +85-234-426-956 (W.-K.M.); +861-881-016-9630 (Y.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
de Geus EJ. Genetic Pathways Underlying Individual Differences in Regular Physical Activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2023; 51:2-18. [PMID: 36044740 PMCID: PMC9762726 DOI: 10.1249/jes.0000000000000305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Twin and family studies show a strong contribution of genetic factors to physical activity (PA) assessed by either self-report or accelerometers. PA heritability is around 43% across the lifespan. Genome-wide association studies have implied biological pathways related to exercise ability and enjoyment. A polygenic score based on genetic variants influencing PA could help improve the success of intervention programs.
Collapse
|
28
|
Schneider FH, Campos-Mercade P, Meier S, Pope D, Wengström E, Meier AN. Financial incentives for vaccination do not have negative unintended consequences. Nature 2023; 613:526-533. [PMID: 36631607 PMCID: PMC9833033 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05512-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Financial incentives to encourage healthy and prosocial behaviours often trigger initial behavioural change1-11, but a large academic literature warns against using them12-16. Critics warn that financial incentives can crowd out prosocial motivations and reduce perceived safety and trust, thereby reducing healthy behaviours when no payments are offered and eroding morals more generally17-24. Here we report findings from a large-scale, pre-registered study in Sweden that causally measures the unintended consequences of offering financial incentives for taking the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. We use a unique combination of random exposure to financial incentives, population-wide administrative vaccination records and rich survey data. We find no negative consequences of financial incentives; we can reject even small negative impacts of offering financial incentives on future vaccination uptake, morals, trust and perceived safety. In a complementary study, we find that informing US residents about the existence of state incentive programmes also has no negative consequences. Our findings inform not only the academic debate on financial incentives for behaviour change but also policy-makers who consider using financial incentives to change behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pol Campos-Mercade
- Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
- University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | - Devin Pope
- University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL, USA
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Erik Wengström
- Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Armando N Meier
- Unisanté and Lausanne Center for Health Economics, Behavior, and Policy (LCHE), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gaysynsky A, Heley K, Chou WYS. An Overview of Innovative Approaches to Support Timely and Agile Health Communication Research and Practice. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:15073. [PMID: 36429796 PMCID: PMC9690360 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192215073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Innovative approaches are needed to make health communication research and practice more timely, responsive, and effective in a rapidly changing information ecosystem. In this paper we provide an overview of strategies that can enhance the delivery and effectiveness of health communication campaigns and interventions, as well as research approaches that can generate useful data and insights for decisionmakers and campaign designers, thereby reducing the research-to-practice gap. The discussion focuses on the following approaches: digital segmentation and microtargeting, social media influencer campaigns, recommender systems, adaptive interventions, A/B testing, efficient message testing protocols, rapid cycle iterative message testing, megastudies, and agent-based modeling. For each method highlighted, we also outline important practical and ethical considerations for utilizing the approach in the context of health communication research and practice, including issues related to transparency, privacy, equity, and potential for harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gaysynsky
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
- ICF Next, ICF, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Kathryn Heley
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Duckworth AL, Milkman KL. A guide to megastudies. PNAS NEXUS 2022; 1:pgac214. [PMID: 36712333 PMCID: PMC9802435 DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
How can behavioral insights best be leveraged to solve pressing policy challenges? Because research studies are typically designed to test the validity of a particular idea, surprisingly little is known about the relative efficacy of different approaches to changing behavior in any given policy context. We discuss megastudies as a research approach that can surmount this and other obstacles to developing optimal behaviorally informed policy interventions. We define a megastudy as "a massive field experiment in which many different treatments are tested synchronously in one large sample using a common, objectively measured outcome." We summarize this apples-to-apples approach to research and lay out recommendations, limitations, and promising future directions for scholars who might want to conduct or evaluate megastudies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela L Duckworth
- Department of Operations, Information and Decisions, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018, USA
| | - Katherine L Milkman
- Department of Operations, Information and Decisions, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Böhm R, Betsch C, Litovsky Y, Sprengholz P, Brewer NT, Chapman G, Leask J, Loewenstein G, Scherzer M, Sunstein CR, Kirchler M. Crowdsourcing interventions to promote uptake of COVID-19 booster vaccines. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 53:101632. [PMID: 36090456 PMCID: PMC9444232 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake rates are behind the rate of primary vaccination in many countries. Governments and non-governmental institutions rely on a range of interventions aiming to increase booster uptake. Yet, little is known how experts and the general public evaluate these interventions. METHODS We applied a novel crowdsourcing approach to provide rapid insights on the most promising interventions to promote uptake of COVID-19 booster vaccines. In the first phase (December 2021), international experts (n = 78 from 17 countries) proposed 46 unique interventions. To reduce noise and potential bias, in the second phase (January 2022), experts (n = 307 from 34 countries) and representative general population samples from the UK (n = 299) and the US (n = 300) rated the proposed interventions on several evaluation criteria, including effectiveness and acceptability, on a 5-point Likert-type scale. FINDINGS Sanctions were evaluated as potentially most effective but least accepted. Evaluations by expert and general population samples were considerably aligned. Interventions that received the most positive evaluations regarding both effectiveness and acceptability across evaluation groups were: a day off work after getting vaccinated, financial incentives, tax benefits, promotional campaigns, and mobile vaccination teams. INTERPRETATION The results provide useful insights to help governmental and non-governmental institutions in their decisions about which interventions to implement. Additionally, the applied crowdsourcing method may be used in future studies to retrieve rapid insights on the comparative evaluation of (health) policies. FUNDING This study received funding from the Austrian Science Fund (SFB F63) and the University of Vienna.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Böhm
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria
- Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen; 1354 Copenhagen K, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science (SODAS), University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Corresponding author at: Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Universitätsstrasse 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
| | - Cornelia Betsch
- Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany
- Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences (CEREB), University of Erfurt, Germany
- Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (BNITM), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yana Litovsky
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philipp Sprengholz
- Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Germany
- Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (BNITM), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Noel T. Brewer
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Gretchen Chapman
- Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
| | - Julie Leask
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - George Loewenstein
- Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
| | - Martha Scherzer
- Consultant, Behavioral and Cultural Insights Unit, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Michael Kirchler
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Polman E, Ruttan RL, Peck J. Using curiosity to incentivize the choice of “should” options. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
33
|
Hu YL, Keglovits M, Somerville E, Snyder M, Stark S. Translating a Functional Exercise Program for Fall Prevention among Diverse Older Adults in Urban, Medically Underserved Areas: A Feasibility Study. PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/02703181.2022.2129906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Ling Hu
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Chang Gung University, Toayuan, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
| | - Marian Keglovits
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Emily Somerville
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Susan Stark
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Goetting MG. Role of Psychologists in Pediatric Sleep Medicine. Pediatr Clin North Am 2022; 69:989-1002. [PMID: 36207108 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2022.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Sleep disorders commonly afflict infants, children, and adolescents and have a significant adverse impact on them and their families, sometimes to a severe degree. They can cause immediate stress and suffering and long-term loss of opportunities and potential. Many of these disorders can be well managed by the psychologist and often one is required, either as the sole provider or as an integral part of a team. Sleep disorders have a bidirectional interplay with mental health disorders. The patient may therefore present initially to the psychologist, primary care provider, or the sleep medicine specialist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G Goetting
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine; Department of Medicine, Center for Clinical Research, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Office 2627, 1000 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-8010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
McKeon G, Mastrogiovanni C, Teychenne M, Rosenbaum S. Barriers and Facilitators to Participating in an Exercise Referral Scheme among Women Living in a Low Socioeconomic Area in Australia: A Qualitative Investigation Using the COM-B and Theoretical Domains Framework. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12312. [PMID: 36231623 PMCID: PMC9565931 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the health benefits of regular physical activity, women experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage are at high risk of inactivity. Reasons are multifactorial but likely include broad structural and contextual factors, e.g., lack of access to physical activity programs, as well as individual and interpersonal factors, e.g., lack of motivation and childcaring responsibilities. Few studies among women of low socioeconomic position (SEP) have explored these factors in-depth, yet an understanding of these factors can help inform the development and improve the uptake of exercise referral schemes. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM-B model (capability, opportunity, motivation and behaviour) were employed to understand behaviours for intervention development. Therefore, using these behaviour change models, this study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators influencing the use of an exercise referral scheme among women living in a socioeconomically disadvantaged area. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women who had registered with a free exercise referral scheme (Live Life Get Active) and living in a low socioeconomic neighbourhood in Sydney, Australia. Reflexive thematic analysis and framework analysis were used to allow naturally identified themes to be determined and then allocated to theoretically driven domains. RESULTS Nine women were interviewed (aged 30-69 years). Eighteen themes were identified and mapped directly on to the six COM-B constructs. The most reported barriers to using the physical activity referral scheme related to the opportunity construct of the COM-B model, specifically childcare responsibilities, work commitments and environmental barriers. Key facilitators were enjoyment (motivation), no cost (opportunity), instructor led (opportunity) and social support (opportunity). CONCLUSION Future exercise referral schemes targeting women living in low-SEP neighbourhoods should ensure programs are designed and delivered to overcome barriers aligned with the constructs of the COM-B model, particularly opportunity-related constructors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace McKeon
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Chiara Mastrogiovanni
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Megan Teychenne
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia
| | - Simon Rosenbaum
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sudharsanan N, Favaretti C, Hachaturyan V, Bärnighausen T, Vandormael A. Effects of side-effect risk framing strategies on COVID-19 vaccine intentions: a randomized controlled trial. eLife 2022; 11:78765. [PMID: 35971757 PMCID: PMC9381035 DOI: 10.7554/elife.78765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Fear over side-effects is one of the main drivers of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. A large literature in the behavioral and communication sciences finds that how risks are framed and presented to individuals affects their judgments of its severity. However, it remains unknown whether such framing changes can affect COVID-19 vaccine behavior and be deployed as policy solutions to reduce hesitancy. Methods: We conducted a pre-registered randomized controlled trial among 8998 participants in the United States and the United Kingdom to examine the effects of different ways of framing and presenting vaccine side-effects on individuals’ willingness to get vaccinated and their perceptions of vaccine safety. Results: Adding a descriptive risk label (‘very low risk’) next to the numerical side-effect and providing a comparison to motor-vehicle mortality increased participants’ willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine by 3.0 percentage points (p=0.003) and 2.4 percentage points (p=0.049), respectively. These effects were independent and additive and combining both framing strategies increased willingness to receive the vaccine by 6.1 percentage points (p<0.001). Mechanistically, we find evidence that these framing effects operate by increasing individuals’ perceptions of how safe the vaccine is. Conclusions: Low-cost side-effect framing strategies can meaningfully affect vaccine intentions at a population level. Funding: Heidelberg Institute of Global Health. Clinical trial number: German Clinical Trials Registry (#DRKS00025551). Vaccination is one of the main strategies for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. But vaccination rates have slowed and are below target levels in countries like the United States and the United Kingdom. While there are many causes of vaccine hesitancy, several studies have found that fear of side effects is the one of the most important. Although COVID-19 vaccine side-effects are rare, how the media presents these risks may amplify concerns. Addressing public concerns over vaccine side effects is key to improving the uptake of vaccines and booster doses, which has been even lower than primary vaccine series uptake. Studies show that how risk is presented affects people’s risk perceptions and behavior. To learn more about how COVID-19 vaccine risk framing affects risk perception, Sudharsanan et al. enrolled 8,998 people from the United States and the United Kingdom in an online randomized controlled trial. Participants received information about a hypothetical new COVID-19 vaccine, including its side effect rate, and reported their perception of safety and whether they would take the vaccine. The experiments showed that adding the label “very low risk” when describing vaccine side effect rates increased the number of people who said they would take the vaccine by three percentage points. Comparing the risks of the hypothetical vaccine to the much higher chances of motor vehicle deaths increased an individual’s willingness to take the vaccine by 2.4 percentage points. Combining both framing strategies increased people’s desire to get vaccinated by 6.1 percentage points. Deploying these two strategies in vaccine risk communications may help increase primary and booster vaccinations against COVID-19. A next step would be to measure both vaccination intentions and vaccination rates to confirm these strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikkil Sudharsanan
- Assistant Professorship of Behavioral Science for Disease Prevention and Health Care,Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caterina Favaretti
- Assistant Professorship of Behavioral Science for Disease Prevention and Health Care,Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Violetta Hachaturyan
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Till Bärnighausen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alain Vandormael
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
No reason to expect large and consistent effects of nudge interventions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2200732119. [PMID: 35858388 PMCID: PMC9351519 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2200732119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
38
|
Exposure to a media intervention helps promote support for peace in Colombia. Nat Hum Behav 2022; 6:847-857. [DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01330-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
39
|
Computational mechanisms for context-based behavioral interventions: A large-scale analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2114914119. [PMID: 35377794 PMCID: PMC9169647 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2114914119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A large body of research in the social and behavioral sciences studies the impact of behavioral interventions (or “nudges”) on decisions. Although this work has been extremely influential, we currently lack an overarching theoretical framework for behavioral interventions that provides a systematic account of their behavioral consequences, cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms, and statistical interpretations. In this paper, we propose such a theoretical framework using the diffusion decision model, a quantitative theory of decision-making whose parameters offer a theoretically compelling characterization of choice underpinnings. Our results not only reveal insights about how context-based interventions alter behavior but also offer practitioners a model-based method for choosing between behavioral interventions based on different goals. Choice context influences decision processes and is one of the primary determinants of what people choose. This insight has been used by academics and practitioners to study decision biases and to design behavioral interventions to influence and improve choices. We analyzed the effects of context-based behavioral interventions on the computational mechanisms underlying decision-making. We collected data from two large laboratory studies involving 19 prominent behavioral interventions, and we modeled the influence of each intervention using a leading computational model of choice in psychology and neuroscience. This allowed us to parametrize the biases induced by each intervention, to interpret these biases in terms of underlying decision mechanisms and their properties, to quantify similarities between interventions, and to predict how different interventions alter key choice outcomes. In doing so, we offer researchers and practitioners a theoretically principled approach to understanding and manipulating choice context in decision-making.
Collapse
|
40
|
Sevic A, Hashemi NS, Thørrisen MM, Strømstad K, Skarpaas LS, Storm M, Brønnick KK. Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions Targeting Employee Health Behaviors: Systematic Review (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 25:e38307. [PMID: 37079369 PMCID: PMC10160931 DOI: 10.2196/38307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of people with noncommunicable diseases is increasing. Noncommunicable diseases are the major cause of disability and premature mortality worldwide, associated with negative workplace outcomes such as sickness absence and reduced work productivity. There is a need to identify scalable interventions and their active components to relieve disease and treatment burden and facilitate work participation. eHealth interventions have shown potential in clinical and general populations to increase well-being and physical activity and could be well suited for workplace settings. OBJECTIVE We aimed to provide an overview of the effectiveness of eHealth interventions at the workplace targeting employee health behaviors and map behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in these interventions. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL in September 2020 and updated in September 2021. Extracted data included participant characteristics, setting, eHealth intervention type, mode of delivery, reported outcomes, effect sizes, and attrition rates. Quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias 2 tool. BCTs were mapped in accordance with the BCT Taxonomy v1. The review was reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. RESULTS In total, 17 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. The measured outcomes, treatment and follow-up periods, content of eHealth interventions, and workplace contexts had high heterogeneity. Of the 17 studies, 4 (24%) reported unequivocally significant findings for all primary outcomes, with effect sizes ranging from small to large. Furthermore, 53% (9/17) of the studies reported mixed results, and 24% (4/17) reported nonsignificant results. The most frequently targeted behavior was physical activity (15/17, 88% of the studies); the least frequently targeted behavior was smoking (2/17, 12% of the studies). Attrition varied greatly across the studies (0%-37%). Risk of bias was high in 65% (11/17) of the studies, with some concerns in the remaining 35% (6/17). Interventions used various BCTs, and the most frequently used were feedback and monitoring (14/17, 82%), goals and planning (10/17, 59%), antecedents (10/17, 59%), and social support (7/17, 41%). CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that, although eHealth interventions may have potential, there are still unanswered questions regarding their effectiveness and what drives the mechanism behind these effects. Low methodological quality, high heterogeneity and complexity, the characteristics of the included samples, and often high attrition rates challenge the investigation of the effectiveness and the making of sound inferences about the effect sizes and significance of the results. To address this, new studies and methods are needed. A megastudy design in which different interventions are evaluated in the same population over the same period on the same outcomes may solve some of the challenges. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020202777; https://www-crd-york-ac-uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=202777.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Sevic
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Neda S Hashemi
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Mikkel Magnus Thørrisen
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kine Strømstad
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Lisebet Skeie Skarpaas
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Storm
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | - Kolbjørn Kallesten Brønnick
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
A 680,000-person megastudy of nudges to encourage vaccination in pharmacies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:2115126119. [PMID: 35105809 PMCID: PMC8833156 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115126119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Encouraging vaccination is a pressing policy problem. To assess whether text-based reminders can encourage pharmacy vaccination and what kinds of messages work best, we conducted a megastudy. We randomly assigned 689,693 Walmart pharmacy patients to receive one of 22 different text reminders using a variety of different behavioral science principles to nudge flu vaccination or to a business-as-usual control condition that received no messages. We found that the reminder texts that we tested increased pharmacy vaccination rates by an average of 2.0 percentage points, or 6.8%, over a 3-mo follow-up period. The most-effective messages reminded patients that a flu shot was waiting for them and delivered reminders on multiple days. The top-performing intervention included two texts delivered 3 d apart and communicated to patients that a vaccine was "waiting for you." Neither experts nor lay people anticipated that this would be the best-performing treatment, underscoring the value of simultaneously testing many different nudges in a highly powered megastudy.
Collapse
|
42
|
Lamprea-Montealegre JA. Improving cardiovascular health through healthy lifestyle behaviours: time to think beyond willpower. Heart 2022; 108:496-497. [PMID: 35121577 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
43
|
Gan Y, Ma J, Peng H, Zhu H, Ju Q, Chen Y. Ten ignored questions for stress psychology research. Psych J 2022; 11:132-141. [PMID: 35112503 DOI: 10.1002/pchj.520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Stress psychology is an interesting and important interdisciplinary research field. In this perspective article, we briefly discuss 10 challenges related to the conceptual definition, research methodology, and translation in the field of stress that do not receive sufficient attention or are ignored entirely. Future research should attempt to integrate a comprehensive stress conceptual framework into a multidimensional comprehensive stress model, incorporating subjective and objective indicators as comprehensive measures. The popularity of machine learning, cognitive neuroscience, and gene epigenetics is a promising approach that brings innovation to the field of stress psychology. The development of wearable devices that precisely record physiological signals to assess stress responses in naturalistic situations, standardize real-life stressors, and measure baselines presents challenges to address in the future. Conducting large individualized and digital intervention studies could be crucial steps in enhancing the translation of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiqun Gan
- School of Psychological Cognitive Sciences, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jinjin Ma
- School of Psychological Cognitive Sciences, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Huini Peng
- School of Psychological Cognitive Sciences, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Huanya Zhu
- School of Psychological Cognitive Sciences, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Qianqian Ju
- School of Psychological Cognitive Sciences, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yidi Chen
- School of Psychological Cognitive Sciences, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tagliabue M. Tutorial. A Behavioral Analysis of Rationality, Nudging, and Boosting: Implications for Policymaking. Perspect Behav Sci 2022; 46:89-118. [PMID: 35103249 PMCID: PMC8791424 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00324-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
As recent trends in policymaking call for increased contributions from behavioral science, nudging and boosting represent two effective and relatively economic approaches for influencing choice behavior. They utilize concepts from behavioral economics to affect agents’ concurrent suboptimal choices: in principle, without applying coercion. However, most choice situations involve some coercive elements. This study features a functional analysis of rationality, nudging, and boosting applied to public policy. The relationship between behavior and environmental variables is termed a “behavioral contingency,” and the analysis can include social and cultural phenomena by applying a selectionist perspective. Principles of behavioral control, whether tight or loose, may be exerted by policymakers or regulators who subscribe to paternalistic principles and may be met with demands of libertarianism among their recipients. This warrants discussion of the legitimacy and likelihood of behavioral control and influence on choices. Cases and examples are provided for extending the unit of analysis of choice behavior to achieve outcomes regulated by policies at the individual and group levels, including health, climate, and education. Further research and intervention comprise the study of macrocontingencies and metacontingencies. Advancing the understanding and application of behavioral science to policymaking may, therefore, benefit from moving from the relatively independent contributions of behavioral economics and behavior analysis to an inclusive selectionist approach for addressing choice behavior and cultural practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Tagliabue
- Department of Behavioural Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Benefits of megastudies for testing behavioural interventions. Nature 2021; 600:392-393. [PMID: 34880475 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-03400-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|