1
|
Bosman S, Misra S, Flax-Nel LM, van Heerden A, Humphries H, Essack Z. A 5-Year Review of the Impact of Lottery Incentives on HIV-Related Services. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2024; 21:131-139. [PMID: 38573583 PMCID: PMC11130023 DOI: 10.1007/s11904-024-00694-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Lottery incentives are an innovative approach to encouraging HIV prevention, treatment initiation, and adherence behaviours. This paper reviews the latest research on lottery incentives' impact on HIV-related services, and their effectiveness for motivating behaviours to improve HIV service engagement and HIV health outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Our review of ten articles, related to lottery incentives, published between 2018 and 2023 (inclusive) shows that lottery incentives have promise for promoting HIV-related target behaviours. The review highlights that lottery incentives may be better for affecting simpler behaviours, rather than more complex ones, such as voluntary medical male circumcision. This review recommends tailoring lottery incentives, ensuring contextual-relevance, to improve the impact on HIV-related services. Lottery incentives offer tools for improving uptake of HIV-related services. The success of lottery incentives appears to be mediated by context, the value and nature of the incentives, and the complexity of the target behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon Bosman
- Centre for Community Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Old Bus Depot, 1 Caluza Street, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.
| | - Shriya Misra
- Centre for Community Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Old Bus Depot, 1 Caluza Street, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
| | - Lili Marie Flax-Nel
- Centre for Community Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Old Bus Depot, 1 Caluza Street, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
| | - Alastair van Heerden
- Centre for Community Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Old Bus Depot, 1 Caluza Street, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
- SAMRC/WITS Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Hilton Humphries
- Centre for Community Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Old Bus Depot, 1 Caluza Street, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
- School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| | - Zaynab Essack
- Centre for Community Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Old Bus Depot, 1 Caluza Street, Sweetwaters, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lesser IA, Wurz A, Bean C, Culos-Reed N, Lear SA, Jung M. Participant Bias in Community-Based Physical Activity Research: A Consistent Limitation? J Phys Act Health 2024; 21:109-112. [PMID: 37935192 DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2023-0267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
Physical activity is a beneficial, yet complex, health behavior. To ensure more people experience the benefits of physical activity, we develop and test interventions to promote physical activity and its associated benefits. Nevertheless, we continue to see certain groups of people who choose not to, or are unable to, take part in research, resulting in "recruitment bias." In fact, we (and others) are seemingly missing large segments of people and are doing little to promote physical activity research to equity-deserving populations. So, how can we better address recruitment bias in the physical activity research we conduct? Based on our experience, we have identified 5 broad, interrelated, and applicable strategies to enhance recruitment and engagement within physical activity interventions: (1) gain trust, (2) increase community support and participation, (3) consider alternative approaches and designs, (4) rethink recruitment strategies, and (5) incentivize participants. While we recognize there is still a long way to go, and there are broader community and societal issues underlying recruitment to research, we hope this commentary prompts researchers to consider what they can do to try to address the ever-present limitation of "recruitment bias" and support greater participation among equity-deserving groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris A Lesser
- School of Kinesiology, University of the Fraser Valley, Chilliwack, BC, Canada
| | - Amanda Wurz
- School of Kinesiology, University of the Fraser Valley, Chilliwack, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Corliss Bean
- Department of Recreation & Leisure Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole Culos-Reed
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Scott A Lear
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mary Jung
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Buisonjé DR, Reijnders T, Cohen Rodrigues TR, Santhanam P, Kowatsch T, Breeman LD, Janssen VR, Kraaijenhagen RA, Kemps HMC, Evers AWM. Less stick more carrot? Increasing the uptake of deposit contract financial incentives for physical activity: A randomized controlled trial. PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE 2024; 70:102532. [PMID: 37678644 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial incentives are a promising tool to help people increase their physical activity, but they are expensive to provide. Deposit contracts are a type of financial incentive in which participants pledge their own money. However, low uptake is a crucial obstacle to the large-scale implementation of deposit contracts. Therefore, we investigated whether (1) matching the deposit 1:1 (doubling what is deposited) and (2) allowing for customizable deposit amounts increased the uptake and short term effectiveness of a deposit contract for physical activity. METHODS In this randomized controlled trial, 137 healthy students (age M = 21.6 years) downloaded a smartphone app that provided them with a tailored step goal and then randomized them to one of four experimental conditions. The deposit contract required either a €10 fixed deposit or a customizable deposit with any amount between €1 and €20 upfront. Furthermore, the deposit was either not matched or 1:1 matched (doubled) with a reward provided by the experiment. During 20 intervention days, daily feedback on goal progress and incentive earnings was provided by the app. We investigated effects on the uptake (measured as agreeing to participate and paying the deposit) and effectiveness of behavioral adoption (measured as participant days goal achieved). FINDINGS Overall, the uptake of deposit contracts was 83.2%, and participants (n = 113) achieved 14.9 out of 20 daily step goals. A binary logistic regression showed that uptake odds were 4.08 times higher when a deposit was matched (p = .010) compared to when it was not matched. Furthermore, uptake odds were 3.53 times higher when a deposit was customizable (p = .022) compared to when it was fixed. Two-way ANCOVA showed that matching (p = .752) and customization (p = .143) did not impact intervention effectiveness. However, we did find a marginally significant interaction effect of deposit matching X deposit customization (p = .063, ηp2 = 0.032). Customization decreased effectiveness when deposits were not matched (p = .033, ηp2 = 0.089), but had no effect when deposits were matched (p = .776, ηp2 = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We provide the first experimental evidence that both matching and customization increase the uptake of a deposit contract for physical activity. We recommend considering both matching and customization to overcome lack of uptake, with a preference for customization since matching a deposit imposes significant additional costs. However, since we found indications that customizable deposits might reduce effectiveness (when the deposits are not matched), we urge for more research on the effectiveness of customizable deposit contracts. Finally, future research should investigate which participant characteristics are predictive of deposit contract uptake and effectiveness. PRE-REGISTRATION OSF Registries, https://osf.io/cgq48.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R de Buisonjé
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Thomas Reijnders
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Human-Centered Design, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, TU Delft, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Talia R Cohen Rodrigues
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Prabhakaran Santhanam
- Centre for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Kowatsch
- Centre for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; School of Medicine, University of St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Linda D Breeman
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Veronica R Janssen
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Hareld M C Kemps
- Department of Cardiology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea W M Evers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden University, Technical University Delft, and Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Swaluw K, Hiemstra M, Lambooij M, Roordink E, van der Vliet N, Zantinge E, Proper K, Zeelenberg M, Prast HM. Lottery incentives for smoking cessation at the workplace: design and protocol of the smoke-free lottery - a cluster randomized trial. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:76. [PMID: 36627613 PMCID: PMC9831882 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14915-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking is the leading behavioral risk factor for the loss of healthy life years. Many smokers want to quit, but have trouble doing so. Financial incentives in workplace settings have shown promising results in supporting smokers and their design influences their impact. Lotteries that leverage behavioral economic insights might improve the effectiveness of workplace cessation support. METHODS AND DESIGN We examine in a cluster randomized trial if a workplace cessation group training paired with lottery deadlines will increase continuous abstinence rates over and above the cessation training alone. Organizations are randomized to either the control arm or lottery arm. The lotteries capitalize regret aversion by always informing winners at the deadline, but withholding prizes if they smoked. In the lottery-arm, winners are drawn out of all participants within a training group, regardless of their smoking status. In weeks 1-13 there are weekly lotteries. Winners are informed about their prize (€50), but can only claim it if they did not smoke that week, validated biochemically. After 26 weeks, there is a long-term lottery where the winners are informed about their prize (vacation voucher worth €400), but can only claim it if they were abstinent between weeks 13 and 26. The primary outcome is continuous abstinence 52 weeks after the quit date. DISCUSSION There is a quest for incentives to support smoking cessation that are considered fair, affordable and effective across different socioeconomic groups. Previous use of behavioral economics in the design of lotteries have shown promising results in changing health behavior. This cluster randomized trial aims to demonstrate if these lotteries are also effective for supporting smoking cessation. Therefore the study design and protocol are described in detail in this paper. Findings might contribute to the application and development of effective cessation support at the workplace. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register Identifier: NL8463 . Date of registration: 17-03-2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen van der Swaluw
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands ,grid.5590.90000000122931605Department of Economics and Business Economics, Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University, 6500 HK Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Hiemstra
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Mattijs Lambooij
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Roordink
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Nina van der Vliet
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands ,grid.12295.3d0000 0001 0943 3265Tilburg University Graduate School, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Else Zantinge
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Health and Society, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Proper
- grid.31147.300000 0001 2208 0118National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XAmsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Zeelenberg
- grid.12295.3d0000 0001 0943 3265Tilburg University, Department of Social Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands ,grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227VU Amsterdam, Department of Marketing, School of Business and Economics, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henriette M. Prast
- grid.12295.3d0000 0001 0943 3265Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands ,grid.465164.40000 0004 0621 2610Dutch Senate, 2500 EA Den Haag, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Designing financial incentives for health behaviour change: a mixed-methods case study of weight loss in men with obesity. J Public Health (Oxf) 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10389-022-01785-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
Designing financial incentives for health behaviour change requires choices across several domains, including value (the size of the incentive), frequency of incentives, and direction (gain or loss). However, the rationale underlying complex incentive design is infrequently reported. Transparent reporting is important if we want to understand and improve the incentive development process. This paper describes a mixed methods approach for designing financial incentives for health behaviour change which involves stakeholders throughout the design process.
Subject and methods
The mixed methods approach focuses on incentives for weight loss for men with obesity living in areas with high levels of disadvantage. The approach involves: (a) using an existing framework to identify all domains of a financial incentive scheme for which choices need to be made, deciding what criteria are relevant (such as effectiveness, acceptability and uptake) and making choices on each domain on the basis of the criteria; (b) conducting a survey of target population preferences to inform choices for domains and to design the incentive scheme; and (c) making final decisions at a stakeholder consensus workshop.
Results
The approach was implemented and an incentive scheme for weight loss for men living with obesity was developed. Qualitative interview data from men receiving the incentives in a feasibility trial endorses our approach.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates that a mixed methods approach with stakeholder involvement can be used to design financial incentives for health behaviour change such as weight loss.
Trial registration number
NCT03040518. Date: 2 February 2017.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hollenberg E, Bani-Fatemi A, Durbin A, Castle D, Kozloff N, Ziegler C, Stergiopoulos V. Using financial incentives to improve health service engagement and outcomes of adults experiencing homelessness: A scoping review of the literature. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e3406-e3434. [PMID: 35912903 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have high rates of acute and chronic health conditions, complex support needs and often face multiple barriers to accessing health services. Financial incentive (FI) interventions have been found effective in improving service engagement and health outcomes for a range of health conditions, populations and settings, but little is known about their impact on PEH. We conducted a scoping review to explore the impact of FI interventions on treatment retention, adherence and other health outcomes of PEH. We searched seven electronic databases from inception to September 2021 to identify peer-reviewed published English language studies that used FI interventions with adult PEH. A scoping review methodology was used to chart relevant data uniformly. Descriptive statistics and narrative syntheses were used to describe outcomes. Thirty-three quantitative articles related to 29 primary studies were published between 1990 and 2021 and met inclusion criteria. Studies targeted three areas of health behaviour change: decreasing substance use or increasing abstinence rates, preventing or treating infectious diseases or promoting lifestyle/general health goal attainment. A variety of FIs were used (cash/non-cash, escalating/fixed schedule, larger/smaller amounts, some/all behaviours rewarded, certain/uncertain reward) across studies. Twenty-six of the primary studies reported significantly better outcomes for the participants receiving FI compared to controls. There were mixed findings about the efficacy of cash versus non-cash FIs, non-cash FIs versus other interventions and higher versus lower value of incentives. Furthermore, there was limited research about long-term outcomes and impacts. FIs have promise in increasing abstinence from substances, engagement in infectious disease treatment, retention in health services and general lifestyle modifications for PEH. Future research should examine long-term impacts and the contribution of co-interventions and intermediary lifestyle behaviour changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Hollenberg
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ali Bani-Fatemi
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Durbin
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Castle
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole Kozloff
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Vicky Stergiopoulos
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hulbert LR, Michael SL, Charter-Harris J, Atkins C, Skeete RA, Cannon MJ. Effectiveness of Incentives for Improving Diabetes-Related Health Indicators in Chronic Disease Lifestyle Modification Programs: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prev Chronic Dis 2022; 19:E66. [PMID: 36302383 PMCID: PMC9616129 DOI: 10.5888/pcd19.220151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We examined the effectiveness of providing incentives to participants in lifestyle modification programs to improve diabetes-related health indicators: body weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, cholesterol, and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C). We also examined the potential effect of 4 different incentive domains (ie, type, monetary value, attainment certainty, and schedule) on those indicators. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies published from January 2008 through August 2021. We used a random-effects model to pool study results and examine between-study heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic and the Cochran Q test. We also conducted moderator analyses by using a mixed-effects model to examine differences between subgroups of incentive domains (eg, incentive type [cash vs other types]). Results Our search yielded 10,965 articles, of which 19 randomized controlled trials met our selection criteria. The random-effects model revealed that, relative to the control group, the incentive group had significant reductions in weight (−1.85kg; 95% CI, −2.40 to −1.29; P < .001), BMI (−0.47kg/m2; 95% CI, −0.71 to −0.22; P < .001), and both systolic blood pressure (−2.59 mm HG; 95% CI, −4.98 to −0.20; P = .03) and diastolic blood pressure (−2.62 mm Hg; 95% CI, −4.61 to −0.64; P = .01). A reduction in cholesterol level was noted but was not significant (−2.81 mg/dL; 95% CI, −8.89 to −3.28; P = .37). One study found a significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c (−0.17%; 95% CI, −0.30% to −0.05%; P < .05). The moderator analyses showed that the incentive effect did not vary significantly between the subgroups of the incentive domains, except on weight loss for the attainment certainty domain, suggesting that a variety of incentive subgroups could be equally useful. Conclusion Providing incentives in lifestyle modification programs is a promising strategy to decrease weight, BMI, and blood pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LaShonda R. Hulbert
- Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- CyberData Technologies, Inc, Herndon, Virginia
| | - Shannon L. Michael
- Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jasmine Charter-Harris
- Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - Charisma Atkins
- Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Michael J. Cannon
- Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Buisonjé DR, Reijnders T, Cohen Rodrigues TR, Prabhakaran S, Kowatsch T, Lipman SA, Bijmolt THA, Breeman LD, Janssen VR, Kraaijenhagen RA, Kemps HMC, Evers AWM. Investigating Rewards and Deposit Contract Financial Incentives for Physical Activity Behavior Change Using a Smartphone App: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e38339. [PMID: 36201384 DOI: 10.2196/38339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial incentive interventions for improving physical activity have proven to be effective but costly. Deposit contracts (in which participants pledge their own money) could be an affordable alternative. In addition, deposit contracts may have superior effects by exploiting the power of loss aversion. Previous research has often operationalized deposit contracts through loss framing a financial reward (without requiring a deposit) to mimic the feelings of loss involved in a deposit contract. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to disentangle the effects of incurring actual losses (through self-funding a deposit contract) and loss framing. We investigated whether incentive conditions are more effective than a no-incentive control condition, whether deposit contracts have a lower uptake than financial rewards, whether deposit contracts are more effective than financial rewards, and whether loss frames are more effective than gain frames. METHODS Healthy participants (N=126) with an average age of 22.7 (SD 2.84) years participated in a 20-day physical activity intervention. They downloaded a smartphone app that provided them with a personalized physical activity goal and either required a €10 (at the time of writing: €1=US $0.98) deposit up front (which could be lost) or provided €10 as a reward, contingent on performance. Daily feedback on incentive earnings was provided and framed as either a loss or gain. We used a 2 (incentive type: deposit or reward) × 2 (feedback frame: gain or loss) between-subjects factorial design with a no-incentive control condition. Our primary outcome was the number of days participants achieved their goals. The uptake of the intervention was a secondary outcome. RESULTS Overall, financial incentive conditions (mean 13.10, SD 6.33 days goal achieved) had higher effectiveness than the control condition (mean 8.00, SD 5.65 days goal achieved; P=.002; ηp2=0.147). Deposit contracts had lower uptake (29/47, 62%) than rewards (50/50, 100%; P<.001; Cramer V=0.492). Furthermore, 2-way analysis of covariance showed that deposit contracts (mean 14.88, SD 6.40 days goal achieved) were not significantly more effective than rewards (mean 12.13, SD 6.17 days goal achieved; P=.17). Unexpectedly, loss frames (mean 10.50, SD 6.22 days goal achieved) were significantly less effective than gain frames (mean 14.67, SD 5.95 days goal achieved; P=.007; ηp2=0.155). CONCLUSIONS Financial incentives help increase physical activity, but deposit contracts were not more effective than rewards. Although self-funded deposit contracts can be offered at low cost, low uptake is an important obstacle to large-scale implementation. Unexpectedly, loss framing was less effective than gain framing. Therefore, we urge further research on their boundary conditions before using loss-framed incentives in practice. Because of limited statistical power regarding some research questions, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution, and future work should be done to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Open Science Framework Registries osf.io/34ygt; https://osf.io/34ygt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R de Buisonjé
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Thomas Reijnders
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Human-Centered Design, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Talia R Cohen Rodrigues
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Santhanam Prabhakaran
- Centre for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Kowatsch
- Centre for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Stefan A Lipman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Tammo H A Bijmolt
- Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Linda D Breeman
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Veronica R Janssen
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Hareld M C Kemps
- Department of Cardiology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | - Andrea W M Evers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Leiden University, Technical University Delft, Erasmus University, Delft, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Inghels M, Kim HY, Mathenjwa T, Shahmanesh M, Seeley J, Wyke S, McGrath N, Sartorius B, Yapa HM, Dobra A, Bärnighausen T, Tanser F. Can a conditional financial incentive (CFI) reduce socio-demographic inequalities in home-based HIV testing uptake? A secondary analysis of the HITS clinical trial intervention in rural South Africa. Soc Sci Med 2022; 311:115305. [PMID: 36084520 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
In sub-Saharan Africa, home-based HIV testing interventions are designed to reach sub-populations with low access to HIV testing such as men, younger or less educated people. Combining these interventions with conditional financial incentives (CFI) has been shown to be effective to increase testing uptake. CFI are effective for one-off health behaviour change but whether they operate differentially on different socio-demographic groups is less clear. Using data from the HITS trial in South Africa, we investigated whether a CFI was able to reduce existing home-based HIV testing uptake inequalities observed by socio-demographic groups. Residents aged ≥15 years in the study area were assigned to an intervention arm (16 clusters) or a control arm (29 clusters). In the intervention arm, individuals received a food voucher (∼3.5 US dollars) if they accepted to take a home-based HIV test. Testing uptake differences were considered for socio-demographic (sex, age, education, employment status, marital status, household asset index) and geographical (urban/rural living area, distance from clinic) characteristics. Among the 37,028 residents, 24,793 (9290 men, 15,503 women) were included in the analysis. CFI increased significantly testing uptake among men (39.2% vs 25.2%, p < 0.001) and women (45.9% vs 32.0%, p < 0.001) with similar absolute increase between men and women. Uptake was higher amongst the youngest or least educated individuals, and amongst single (vs in union) or unemployed men. Absolute uptake increase was also significantly higher amongst these groups resulting in increasing socio-demographic differentials for home-based HIV testing uptake. However, because these groups are known to have less access to other public HIV testing services, CFI could reduce inequalities for HIV testing access in our specific context. Although CFI significantly increased home-based HIV testing uptake, it did not do so differentially by socio-demographic group. Future interventions using CFI should make sure that the intervention alone does not increase existing health inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Inghels
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK; Centre Population et Développement (UMR 196 Paris Descartes - IRD), SageSud (ERL INSERM 1244), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Paris, France.
| | - Hae-Young Kim
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; KwaZulu-Natal Innovation and Sequencing Platform, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
| | | | - Maryam Shahmanesh
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Janet Seeley
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
| | - Sally Wyke
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
| | - Nuala McGrath
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Department of Social Statistics and Demography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Benn Sartorius
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - H Manisha Yapa
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | | - Till Bärnighausen
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Frank Tanser
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK; Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schmidtke KA, Kudrna L, Noufaily A, Stallard N, Skrybant M, Russell S, Clarke A. Evaluating the relationship between moral values and vaccine hesitancy in Great Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey. Soc Sci Med 2022; 308:115218. [PMID: 35870299 PMCID: PMC9281411 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
RATIONAL/OBJECTIVE Mandating vaccinations can harm public trust, and informational interventions can backfire. An alternative approach could align pro-vaccination messages with the automatic moral values and intuitions that vaccine-hesitant people endorse. The current study evaluates the relationships between six automatic moral intuitions and vaccine hesitancy. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was designed using Qualtrics (2020) software and conducted online from April 6th to April 13, 2021. A representative sample of 1201 people living in Great Britain took part, of which 954 (514 female) passed the attention check items. Participants responded to items about their automatic moral intuitions, vaccination behaviours or intentions related to COVID-19 vaccines, and general vaccine hesitancy. Regressions (with and without adjustments for age, gender, and ethnicity) were performed assessing the association between endorsement of each automatic intuition and self-reported uptake of COVID-19 vaccines, and between each automatic intuition and general vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS People who endorsed the authority foundation and those who more strongly endorsed the liberty foundation tended to be more vaccine hesitant. This pattern generalises across people's self-reported uptake of COVID-19 vaccines and people's hesitancy towards vaccines in general. To a lesser extent people who expressed less need for care and a greater need for sanctity also displayed greater hesitancy towards vaccines in general. The results were consistent across the adjusted and non-adjusted analyses. Age and ethnicity significantly contributed to some models but gender did not. CONCLUSION Four automatic moral intuitions (authority, liberty, care, and sanctity) were significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy. Foundation-aligned messages could be developed to motivate those people who may otherwise refuse vaccines, e.g., messages that strongly promote liberty or that de-emphasize authority voices. This suggestion moves away from mandates and promotes the inclusion of a more diverse range of voices in pro-vaccination campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Kudrna
- University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Nigel Stallard
- University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
| | - Magdalena Skrybant
- University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | - Samantha Russell
- University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | - Aileen Clarke
- University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ung COL, Hu Y, Hu H, Bian Y. Investigating the intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccination in Macao: implications for vaccination strategies. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:218. [PMID: 35246072 PMCID: PMC8894128 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07191-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding the intention of receiving COVID-19 vaccines is important to inform effective vaccination strategies. This study aimed to investigate such intention, identify the key influencing factors, and determine the most important intention predictors using a theoretically principled model. Methods An online, cross-sectional survey method was implemented in Macao in May 2021. People aged 18 years or above and residing in Macao for 12 months prior to the study were recruited through social media. Intention to receive COVID-19 vaccines and the main constructs of the protection motivation theory and the health belief model were the main measures encompassing threat appraisal, intrapersonal characteristics, cues to action, coping appraisal, past experiences and information seeking behavior. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis. Results A total of 552 valid responses were received. Among the respondents, 79.5% aged between 25 and 54 years old, 59.4% were female, and 88% had a bachelor degree or above; 62.3% of the respondents indicated their intention to receive COVID-19 vaccination while 19.2% were hesitant and 18.5% did not have any intention. While 67.0% believed COVID-19 infection was life-threatening, only 19.0% thought they were at risk of getting infected. Control variables such as age, gender, education level, and having travel plans were significantly correlated with intention. Significant associations between intention with perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, maladaptive response reward, self-efficacy, response-efficacy, response cost, social attitude, social norm, past experience and information seeking behavior were identified (P < 0.05). The most important positive predictors of intention were “being able to make arrangement to receive the vaccine” (β = 0.333, P < 0.001), “a sense of social responsibility” (β = 0.326, P < 0.001), and “time off from work after vaccination” (β = 0.169, P < 0.001), whereas “concerns over vaccine safety” (β = − 0.124, P < 0.001) and “relying on online resources for vaccine information” (β = − 0.065, P < 0.05) were negative predictors. Perceived severity in terms of COVID-19 being a life threatening illness was not a predictor of intention. Conclusion This study reaffirmed that intention to receive COVID-19 vaccination is an ongoing concern in the combat of the pandemic. Multi-component strategies to enhance health literacy that supports well-informed decision-making, increase vaccination convenience, promote social responsibility, and provide time-off incentives are among the key considerations in designing and improve vaccination campaigns in Macao.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Oi Lam Ung
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Room 2058, N22 Research Building, Macao SAR, China.,Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Room 1046, E12 Research Building, Macao SAR, China
| | - Yuanjia Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Room 2058, N22 Research Building, Macao SAR, China.,Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Room 1046, E12 Research Building, Macao SAR, China
| | - Hao Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Room 2058, N22 Research Building, Macao SAR, China
| | - Ying Bian
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Room 2058, N22 Research Building, Macao SAR, China. .,Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Room 1046, E12 Research Building, Macao SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Review of Behavioral Psychology in Transition to Solar Photovoltaics for Low-Income Individuals. SUSTAINABILITY 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/su14031537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
The increase in nonrenewable energy (non-RE) has been a growing concern for low-income individuals’ quality of life, health, economy, and environment. At the same time, the use of non-RE is also a great concern for the whole population as we are breathing the same environment. The photovoltaics (PV) solar panel is one solution to decrease low-income individuals’ energy bills and increase the quality of life of all individuals. Knowing the behavioral theory of why low-income individuals do not adopt PV would allow further insights and possible interventions to help low-income individuals install PV. Research has found that low-income individuals are more likely to have financial and knowledge barriers that hinder them from installing PV. Providing a way for low-income individuals to combat these barriers would help them to use PV. This review showed that low-income individuals are likely to benefit from policy programs that incentivize them to use PV. More knowledge about PV can also be aided by policy programs that inform low-income individuals how to save financially and at the same time work their way to install PV. Social groups could also be formed in the same policy programs to help low-income individuals share strategies on saving financially and knowledge about the benefit of installing PV. These social groups can act as a social reinforcement to low-income individuals to install PV. Helping low-income individuals to install PV would help low-income individuals financially and improve the population’s quality of life.
Collapse
|
13
|
Wilding S, O'Connor DB, Conner M. Financial incentives for bowel cancer screening: Results from a mixed methods study in the United Kingdom. Br J Health Psychol 2021; 27:741-755. [PMID: 34747113 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of bowel cancer screening is to test for signs of cancer before symptoms develop. Financial incentives are one potential method to increase participation rates. Few studies have tested incentives in relation to bowel screening in the United Kingdom (UK). The current research explored reactions to different financial incentives to participate in population-level bowel cancer screening in a UK sample. DESIGN An online mixed methods study. Recruitment was via a study recruitment website (https://prolific.ac/). METHODS 499 participants (aged 60-74 years) completed a survey on invitations for population-level bowel cancer screening using different levels of financial incentives. RESULT Respondents were generally positive about the use of financial incentives. A £10 voucher was most frequently selected as the appropriate amount to incentivise screening participation. The current invitation method with no voucher was judged to be most acceptable but suggested to produce the lowest likelihood of others participating. Offering a £10 voucher that the NHS would not be charged for if not used was the second most acceptable invitation method. There were few differences between invitation methods on own perceived likelihood of participation in bowel screening. Offering a £10 voucher was seen as leading to the greatest likelihood of others participating in bowel screening. Findings were largely unaffected by participant demographics. CONCLUSION The use of small financial incentives to increase bowel cancer screening uptake was generally well received. Impacts of incentives on actual bowel screening rates in UK samples need to be established in the light of the current findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark Conner
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rondina R, Hong M, Sarma S, Mitchell M. Is it worth it? Cost-effectiveness analysis of a commercial physical activity app. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1950. [PMID: 34706689 PMCID: PMC8548862 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11988-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Government interest in investing in commercial physical activity apps has increased with little evidence of their cost-effectiveness. This is the first study to our knowledge to examine the cost-effectiveness of a commercial physical activity app (Carrot Rewards) despite there being over 100,000 in the major app stores. METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the app compared to a no-intervention reference scenario using a five-year time horizon. Primary data was collected between 2016 and 2017. Data synthesis, model creation, and statistical analyses were conducted between 2019 and 2020. An age-, sex-, and geography-dependent Markov model was developed assuming a public healthcare payer perspective. A closed cohort (n = 38,452) representing the population reached by Carrot Rewards in two Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Newfoundland & Labrador) at the time of a 12-month prospective study was used. Costs and effects were both discounted at 1.5% and expressed in 2015 Canadian dollars. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare ICERs between provinces, sexes, age groups, and engagement levels. RESULTS Carrot Rewards had an ICER of $11,113 CAD per quality adjusted life year (QALY), well below a $50,000 CAD per QALY willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Subgroup analyses revealed that the app had lower ICERs for British Columbians, females, highly engaged users, and adults aged 35-64 yrs., and was dominant for older adults (65 + yrs). Deterministic sensitivity analyses revealed that the ICER was most influenced by the relative risk of diabetes. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed varying parameter estimates predominantly resulted in ICERs below the WTP threshold. CONCLUSIONS The Carrot Rewards app was cost-effective, and dominant for older adults. These results provide, for the first time, rigorous health economic evidence for a commercial physical activity app as part of public health programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renante Rondina
- Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Michael Hong
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Sisira Sarma
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marc Mitchell
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Miranda JJ, Pesantes MA, Lazo-Porras M, Portocarrero J, Diez-Canseco F, Carrillo-Larco RM, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Trujillo AJ, Aldridge RW. Design of financial incentive interventions to improve lifestyle behaviors and health outcomes: A systematic review. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 6:163. [PMID: 34595355 PMCID: PMC8447049 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16947.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Financial incentives may improve the initiation and engagement of behaviour change that reduce the negative outcomes associated with non-communicable diseases. There is still a paucity in guidelines or recommendations that help define key aspects of incentive-oriented interventions, including the type of incentive (e.g. cash rewards, vouchers), the frequency and magnitude of the incentive, and its mode of delivery. We aimed to systematically review the literature on financial incentives that promote healthy lifestyle behaviours or improve health profiles, and focused on the methodological approach to define the incentive intervention and its delivery. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO on 26 July 2018 ( CRD42018102556). Methods: We sought studies in which a financial incentive was delivered to improve a health-related lifestyle behaviour (e.g., physical activity) or a health profile (e.g., HbA1c in people with diabetes). The search (which took place on March 3 rd 2018) was conducted using OVID (MEDLINE and Embase), CINAHL and Scopus. Results: The search yielded 7,575 results and 37 were included for synthesis. Of the total, 83.8% (31/37) of the studies were conducted in the US, and 40.5% (15/37) were randomised controlled trials. Only one study reported the background and rationale followed to develop the incentive and conducted a focus group to understand what sort of incentives would be acceptable for their study population. There was a degree of consistency across the studies in terms of the direction, form, certainty, and recipient of the financial incentives used, but the magnitude and immediacy of the incentives were heterogeneous. Conclusions: The available literature on financial incentives to improve health-related lifestyles rarely reports on the rationale or background that defines the incentive approach, the magnitude of the incentive and other relevant details of the intervention, and the reporting of this information is essential to foster its use as potential effective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Jaime Miranda
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15102, Peru
| | - M. Amalia Pesantes
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
| | - María Lazo-Porras
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - Jill Portocarrero
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
| | - Francisco Diez-Canseco
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
| | - Rodrigo M. Carrillo-Larco
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W2 1UA, UK
| | - Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
| | - Antonio J. Trujillo
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Robert W. Aldridge
- Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Breen RJ, Ferguson SG, Palmer MA. Smokers' Perceptions of Incentivized Smoking Cessation Programs: Examining How Payment Thresholds Change With Income. Nicotine Tob Res 2021; 23:1567-1574. [PMID: 33621322 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Studies demonstrate that financial incentive programs increase smoking cessation. However, there is little guidance on which incentive magnitudes will ensure optimal enrollment and motivation levels. This study investigates current smokers' perceptions of varying incentive magnitudes to identify whether there is evidence for optimal amount(s) and whether perceptions differ by income group. METHODS Studies 1 (N = 56) and 2 (N = 147) were conducted online via Prolific.co. Current smokers were randomly shown multiple hypothetical incentive programs that differed only in the incentive amount offered. For each program, smokers rated its appeal and their likelihood of enrolling and predicted their motivation to quit if enrolled. Growth models were used to investigate the relationship between perspectives and the incentive amount. RESULTS An increasing quadratic trend in smokers' perceptions of programs as the incentive amount increased was identified. Incentive amounts beyond approximately £50-75 per week (£500-£750 total) did not significantly alter perceptions of programs. In Study 2, high-income smokers found programs significantly less appealing and motivating than low-income smokers, although no significant between-group differences were observed in the likelihood of enrollment. No significant differences were observed between low- and middle-income smokers. CONCLUSIONS Increasing the incentive amount increased smoker's perceptions of programs. This relationship was curvilinear, meaning there may be a point beyond which further increasing the amount will not improve enrollment or motivation levels. Incentives appear equally appealing to low- and middle-income smokers; the population among whom smoking is most prevalent. Future research could explore other elements of program design and whether findings hold under real-world conditions. IMPLICATIONS While acknowledging that they work, policymakers frequently request information about the monetary amount needed for incentive programs to be effective, and if this differs by income level. We investigated these questions using smokers' perceptions of hypothetical cessation programs that differed in the amount offered. An increasing quadratic trend in perceptions of programs by the amount and potential cut points was observed, suggesting a point may exist beyond which increasing the incentive will not improve perceptions of programs or enrollment levels. High-income smokers may not perceive incentives to be as appealing as other income groups, but appear equally willing to enroll.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel J Breen
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
| | - Stuart G Ferguson
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
| | - Matthew A Palmer
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gagnon M, Payne A, Guta A. What are the ethical implications of using prize-based contingency management in substance use? A scoping review. Harm Reduct J 2021; 18:82. [PMID: 34348710 PMCID: PMC8335458 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-021-00529-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The area of substance use is notable for its early uptake of incentives and wealth of research on the topic. This is particularly true for prize-based contingency management (PB-CM), a particular type of incentive that uses a fishbowl prize-draw design. Given that PB-CM interventions are gaining momentum to address the dual public health crises of opiate and stimulant use in North America and beyond, it is imperative that we better understand and critically analyze their implications. PURPOSE The purpose of this scoping review paper is to identify the characteristics of PB-CM interventions for people who use substances and explore ethical implications documented in the literature as well as emerging ethical implications that merit further consideration. METHODS The PRISMA-ScR checklist was used in conjunction with Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework to guide this scoping review. We completed a two-pronged analysis of 52 research articles retrieved through a comprehensive search across three key scholarly databases. After extracting descriptive data from each article, we used 9 key domains to identify characteristics of the interventions followed by an analysis of ethical implications. RESULTS We analyzed the characteristics of PB-CM interventions which were predominantly quantitative studies aimed at studying the efficacy of PB-CM interventions. All of the interventions used a prize-draw format with a classic magnitude of 50%. Most of the interventions combined both negative and positive direction to reward processes, behaviors, and/or outcomes. One ethical implication was identified in the literature: the risk of gambling relapse. We also found three emerging ethical implications by further analyzing participant characteristics, intervention designs, and potential impact on the patient-provider relationship. These implications include the potential deceptive nature of PB-CM, the emphasis placed on the individual behaviors to the detriment of social and structural determinants of health, and failures to address vulnerability and power dynamics. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review offers important insights into the ethics on PB-CM and its implications for research ethics, clinical ethics, and public health ethics. Additionally, it raises important questions that can inform future research and dialogues to further tease out the ethical issues associated with PB-CM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilou Gagnon
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada.
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.
| | - Alayna Payne
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Adrian Guta
- School of Social Work, University of Windsor, 167 Ferry Street, Windsor, ON, N9A 0C5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Miranda JJ, Pesantes MA, Lazo-Porras M, Portocarrero J, Diez-Canseco F, Carrillo-Larco RM, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Trujillo AJ, Aldridge RW. Design of financial incentive interventions to improve lifestyle behaviors and health outcomes: A systematic review. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 6:163. [PMID: 34595355 PMCID: PMC8447049 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16947.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Financial incentives may improve the initiation and engagement of behaviour change that reduce the negative outcomes associated with non-communicable diseases. There is still a paucity in guidelines or recommendations that help define key aspects of incentive-oriented interventions, including the type of incentive (e.g. cash rewards, vouchers), the frequency and magnitude of the incentive, and its mode of delivery. We aimed to systematically review the literature on financial incentives that promote healthy lifestyle behaviours or improve health profiles, and focused on the methodological approach to define the incentive intervention and its delivery. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO on 26 July 2018 ( CRD42018102556). Methods: We sought studies in which a financial incentive was delivered to improve a health-related lifestyle behaviour (e.g., physical activity) or a health profile (e.g., HbA1c in people with diabetes). The search (which took place on March 3 rd 2018) was conducted using OVID (MEDLINE and Embase), CINAHL and Scopus. Results: The search yielded 7,575 results and 37 were included for synthesis. Of the total, 83.8% (31/37) of the studies were conducted in the US, and 40.5% (15/37) were randomised controlled trials. Only one study reported the background and rationale followed to develop the incentive and conducted a focus group to understand what sort of incentives would be acceptable for their study population. There was a degree of consistency across the studies in terms of the direction, form, certainty, and recipient of the financial incentives used, but the magnitude and immediacy of the incentives were heterogeneous. Conclusions: The available literature on financial incentives to improve health-related lifestyles rarely reports on the rationale or background that defines the incentive approach, the magnitude of the incentive and other relevant details of the intervention, and the reporting of this information is essential to foster its use as potential effective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Jaime Miranda
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15102, Peru
| | - M. Amalia Pesantes
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
| | - María Lazo-Porras
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - Jill Portocarrero
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
| | - Francisco Diez-Canseco
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
| | - Rodrigo M. Carrillo-Larco
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W2 1UA, UK
| | - Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, 15074, Peru
| | - Antonio J. Trujillo
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Robert W. Aldridge
- Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Boonmanunt S, Pattanaprateep O, Ongphiphadhanakul B, McKay G, Attia J, Thakkinstian A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of behavioural economic incentive programmes for the promotion of a healthy diet and physical activity: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e046035. [PMID: 33371052 PMCID: PMC7754655 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Obesity and being overweight are major risk factors for metabolic syndrome and non-communicable diseases. Despite the recommendation that a healthy diet and physical activity can reduce the severity of these diseases, many fail to adhere to these measures. From a behavioural economic perspective, adherence to such measures can be encouraged through financial incentives. However, additional related behavioural economic approaches may improve the effectiveness of an incentive programme. As such, we have developed a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis to summarise the current evidence from financial incentive programmes with and without behavioural economic insights for promoting healthy diet and physical activity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Previous systematic reviews, meta-analyses and individual studies were identified from Medline and Scopus in June 2020 and will be updated until December 2020. Individual studies will be selected and data extracted by two reviewers. Disagreement will be resolved by consensus or adjudicated by a third reviewer. A descriptive analysis will summarise the effectiveness of behavioural economic incentive programmes for promoting healthy diet and physical activity. Moreover, individual studies will be pooled using network meta-analyses where possible. I2 statistics and Cochran's Q test will be used to assess heterogeneity. Risk of bias and publication bias, if appropriate, will be evaluated, as well as the overall strength of the evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval for a systematic review and meta-analysis is not required. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020198024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suparee Boonmanunt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mahidol University, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Oraluck Pattanaprateep
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mahidol University, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Gareth McKay
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Belfast, UK
| | - John Attia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ammarin Thakkinstian
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mahidol University, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pearson E, Prapavessis H, Higgins C, Petrella R, White L, Mitchell M. Adding team-based financial incentives to the Carrot Rewards physical activity app increases daily step count on a population scale: a 24-week matched case control study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020; 17:139. [PMID: 33208166 PMCID: PMC7677847 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-01043-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) targeting physical inactivity have increased in popularity yet are usually limited by low engagement. This study examined the impact of adding team-based incentives (Step Together Challenges, STCs) to an existing mHealth app (Carrot Rewards) that rewarded individual physical activity achievements. Methods A 24-week quasi-experimental study (retrospective matched pairs design) was conducted in three Canadian provinces (pre-intervention: weeks 1–12; intervention: weeks 13–24). Participants who used Carrot Rewards and STCs (experimental group) were matched with those who used Carrot Rewards only (controls) on age, gender, province and baseline mean daily step count (±500 steps/d). Carrot Rewards users earned individual-level incentives (worth $0.04 CAD) each day they reached a personalized daily step goal. With a single partner, STC users could earn team incentives ($0.40 CAD) for collaboratively reaching individual daily step goals 10 times in seven days (e.g., Partner A completes four goals and Partner B completes six goals in a week). Results The main analysis included 61,170 users (mean age = 32 yrs.; % female = 64). Controlling for pre-intervention mean daily step count, a significant difference in intervention mean daily step count favoured the experimental group (p < 0.0001; ηp2 = 0.024). The estimated marginal mean group difference was 537 steps per day, or 3759 steps per week (about 40 walking min/wk). Linear regression suggested a dose-response relationship between the number of STCs completed (app engagement) and intervention mean daily step count (adjusted R2 = 0.699) with each new STC corresponding to approximately 200 more steps per day. Conclusion Despite an explosion of physical activity app interest, low engagement leading to small or no effects remains an industry hallmark. In this paper, we found that adding modest team-based incentives to the Carrot Rewards app increased mean daily step count, and importantly, app engagement moderated this effect. Others should consider novel small-teams based approaches to boost engagement and effects. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-020-01043-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Pearson
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, Western University, Arts & Humanities Building, Room 3R12B, London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada
| | - Harry Prapavessis
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, Western University, Arts & Humanities Building, Room 3R12B, London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada
| | | | - Robert Petrella
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, Western University, Arts & Humanities Building, Room 3R12B, London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada.,Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Marc Mitchell
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, Western University, Arts & Humanities Building, Room 3R12B, London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada. .,Carrot Insights Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gagnon M, Guta A, Upshur R, Murray SJ, Bungay V. "It gets people through the door": a qualitative case study of the use of incentives in the care of people at risk or living with HIV in British Columbia, Canada. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:105. [PMID: 33109165 PMCID: PMC7590593 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00548-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There has been growing interest in the use of incentives to increase the uptake of health-related behaviours and achieve desired health outcomes at the individual and population level. However, the use of incentives remains controversial for ethical reasons. An area in which incentives have been not only proposed but used is HIV prevention, testing, treatment and care—each one representing an interconnecting step in the "HIV Cascade." Methods The main objective of this qualitative case study was to document the experiences of health care and service providers tasked with administrating incentivized HIV testing, treatment, and care in British Columbia, Canada. A second objective was to explore the ethical and professional tensions that arise from the use of incentives as well as strategies used by providers to mitigate them. We conducted interviews with 25 providers and 6 key informants, which were analyzed using applied thematic analysis. We also collected documents and took field notes. Results Our findings suggest that incentives target populations believed to pose the most risk to public health. As such, incentives are primarily used to close the gaps in the HIV Cascade by getting the "right populations" to test, start treatment, stay on treatment, and, most importantly, achieve (and sustain) viral suppression. Participants considered that incentives work because they "bring people through the door." However, they believed the effectiveness of incentives to be superficial, short-lived and one-dimensional—thus, failing to address underlying structural barriers to care and structural determinants of health. They also raised concerns about the unintended consequences of incentives and the strains they may put on the therapeutic relationship. They had developed strategies to mitigate the ensuing ethical and professional tensions and to make their work feel relational rather than transactional. Conclusions We identify an urgent need to problematize the use of incentives as a part of the "HIV Cascade" agenda and interrogate the ethics of engaging in this practice from the perspective of health care and service providers. More broadly, we question the introduction of market logic into the realm of health care—an area of life previously not subject to monetary exchanges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilou Gagnon
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC, V8N 5M8, Canada.
| | - Adrian Guta
- School of Social Work, University of Windsor, 167 Ferry Street, Windsor, ON, N9A 0C5, Canada
| | - Ross Upshur
- Dalla Lana Chair in Clinical Public Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, 678-155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Stuart J Murray
- Canada Research Chair in Rhetoric and Ethics, Department of English Language and Literature, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Vicky Bungay
- Canada Research Chair in Gender, Equity and Community Engagement, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T2B5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
The effectiveness of a monetary reimbursement model for weight reduction via a smartphone application: a preliminary retrospective study. Sci Rep 2020; 10:15714. [PMID: 32973278 PMCID: PMC7519092 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72908-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Weight loss for obese populations has been a challenging subject. There are numerous mobile applications to address weight loss, but the low retention rate is a barrier for the intervention. This is a retrospective study, aiming to investigate the effectiveness of financial incentives to achieve weight loss via a monetary reimbursement model on a smartphone application. Participants voluntarily purchased a 16-week mobile weight loss application program, and those who logged food intake three times a day received monetary reimbursement up to the full amount they initially paid. We analyzed health-related information and logged in-app activities from participants (N = 2,803) including age, sex, weight, food intake, and physical activity on their mobile healthcare application called Noom from January 2017 to April 2019. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare differences between groups who succeeded and failed at food logging, controlling for baseline BMI. The ANCOVA found that participants who completed the food logging successfully for 16 weeks (N = 1,565) lost significantly more weight than those who failed food logging (N = 1,238, F = 56.0, p < 0.001). In addition, participants who were able to log their food intake successfully exercised more (F = 41.5, p < 0.001), read more in-app articles (F = 120.7, p < 0.001), and consumed more quantity of healthy foods (F = 12.8, p < 0.001). Monetary reimbursement is an effective tool for weight reduction by encouraging participants to monitor their health-related behaviors regularly.
Collapse
|
23
|
Dombrowski SU, McDonald M, van der Pol M, Grindle M, Avenell A, Carroll P, Calveley E, Elders A, Glennie N, Gray CM, Harris FM, Hapca A, Jones C, Kee F, McKinley MC, Skinner R, Tod M, Hoddinott P. Text messaging and financial incentives to encourage weight loss in men with obesity: the Game of Stones feasibility RCT. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/phr08110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
In 2016, 26% of UK men were estimated to be obese. Systematic reviews suggest that few men engage in formal weight loss interventions that support weight reduction and improve health.
Objective
To co-produce, with patient and public involvement, an acceptable and feasible randomised controlled trial design to test a men-only weight management intervention.
Design
This was a two-phase feasibility study. Phase 1 was the development of intervention components, study procedures and materials including a discrete choice experiment with survey questions. Phase 2 was an individually randomised three-arm feasibility trial over 12 months. Qualitative interviews were conducted at 3 and 12 months.
Setting
The setting was two sites in Scotland that had disadvantaged urban and rural areas and differed in employment levels and ethnic groups.
Participants
In phase 1, 1045 men with obesity were recruited by Ipsos MORI (London, UK; www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk) to represent the UK population. In phase 2, 105 men with obesity were recruited in the community or through general practice obesity registers. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 50 men at 3 months and with 33 men at 12 months.
Interventions
The trial arms were narrative short message service (SMS) for 12 months (SMS only), financial endowment incentive informed by loss aversion and linked to achievement of weight loss targets plus narrative SMS for 12 months (SMS + I), and waiting list control group for 12 months followed by 3 months of an alternative SMS style developed based on feedback from men who had received the narrative SMS (control).
Main outcome measures
The main outcome measures were acceptability and feasibility of recruitment, retention, engagement, intervention components and trial procedures. Outcomes were assessed by examining procedural, quantitative and qualitative data at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Results
The most acceptable incentive strategy, based on the discrete choice experiment results, was to verify weight loss of 5% at 3 months, verify weight loss of 10% at 6 months and maintain weight loss of 10% at 12 months. Overall, 105 men with obesity from across the socioeconomic spectrum were successfully recruited to target, 59% of whom lived in more disadvantaged areas. Retention at 12 months was acceptable (74%) and was higher among individuals from disadvantaged areas. Narrative SMS were acceptable to many men, with a minority reporting negative reactions. Incentives were acceptable but were not the primary motivation for behaviour change. Twelve men in the incentive arm (33%) secured at least some money and three (8%) secured the full amount. Both intervention arms lost some weight, with greater weight loss in the arm that received SMS and incentives. The alternative SMS based on men’s feedback received no strong negative reactions.
Limitations
Fewer participants from the SMS + I arm (64%) completed the study at 12 months than did those in the SMS-only (79%) and control (83%) arms. The reasons for this difference were complex.
Conclusions
The men-only weight management intervention consisting of narrative SMS and financial incentives was acceptable and feasible, meeting the progression criteria for a full trial. Tailoring of SMS may improve acceptability and retention.
Future work
Minor refinements to the intervention components based on the study findings will be made prior to testing in a multisite definitive randomised controlled trial.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03040518.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 8, No. 11. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan U Dombrowski
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada
- Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Matthew McDonald
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Mark Grindle
- Division of Rural Health and Wellbeing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK
| | - Alison Avenell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Eileen Calveley
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicola Glennie
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Cindy M Gray
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Fiona M Harris
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Adrian Hapca
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Claire Jones
- Health Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Frank Kee
- Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Skinner
- Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Pat Hoddinott
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rockliffe L, Stearns S, Forster AS. A qualitative exploration of using financial incentives to improve vaccination uptake via consent form return in female adolescents in London. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0237805. [PMID: 32822387 PMCID: PMC7446903 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Incentivising vaccine consent form return may improve vaccine uptake and be seen as less coercive than incentivising vaccination itself. We assessed the acceptability of financial incentives in this context among adolescent females and explored potential mechanisms by which incentives might change behaviour. DESIGN Focus groups and analysis of free-text questionnaire responses. METHODS Study 1: 36 female secondary students in London (age 13-14) participated in six focus groups exploring the use of incentives in the context of vaccination. Data were analysed thematically. Study 2: was conducted to triangulate the findings of Study 1, by analysing free-text questionnaire responses from 181 female secondary students in London (age 12-13) reporting their opinion of incentivising consent form return. Data from Study 1 was also used to explore perceived potential mechanisms of action by which incentives might encourage consent form return. RESULTS Focus group participants had positive attitudes towards incentives, with 61% of free-text responses also expressing this. Most focus group participants thought that incentives would encourage consent form return (18% of free-text respondents spontaneously also mentioned this). While incentivising consent form return was seen as ethical, focus group participants who incorrectly thought that vaccine receipt was being incentivised raised concerns about bribery, although only 4% of free text respondents reported these concerns. Frequently raised mechanisms of action included incentives increasing engagement with, and the perceived value of consent form return. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents had positive views of financially incentivising consent form return to promote vaccine uptake, although care must be taken to reduce misconceptions regarding what is being incentivised. Incentivising vaccination was seen as coercive, but incentivising actions that increase the likelihood of vaccination (i.e. consent form return) were not. Incentives may encourage adolescents to return consent forms by helping them engage with this behaviour or increasing its' perceived value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Rockliffe
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Selma Stearns
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alice S. Forster
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brower J, LaBarge MC, White L, Mitchell MS. Examining Responsiveness to an Incentive-Based Mobile Health App: Longitudinal Observational Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e16797. [PMID: 32773371 PMCID: PMC7445608 DOI: 10.2196/16797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Carrot Rewards app was developed as part of a public-private partnership to reward Canadians with loyalty points for downloading the app, referring friends, completing educational health quizzes, and health-related behaviors with long-term objectives of increasing health knowledge and encouraging healthy behaviors. During the first 3 months after program rollout in British Columbia, a number of program design elements were adjusted, creating observed differences between groups of users with respect to the potential impact of program features on user engagement levels. Objective This study examines the impact of reducing reward size over time and explored the influence of other program features such as quiz timing, health intervention content, and type of reward program on user engagement with a mobile health (mHealth) app. Methods Participants in this longitudinal, nonexperimental observational study included British Columbia citizens who downloaded the app between March and July 2016. A regression methodology was used to examine the impact of changes to several program design features on quiz offer acceptance and engagement with this mHealth app. Results Our results, based on the longitudinal app use of 54,917 users (mean age 35, SD 13.2 years; 65.03% [35,647/54,917] female), indicated that the key drivers of the likelihood of continued user engagement, in order of greatest to least impact, were (1) type of rewards earned by users (eg, movies [+355%; P<.001], air travel [+210%; P<.001], and grocery [+140%; P<.001] relative to gas), (2) time delay between early offers (−64%; P<.001), (3) the content of the health intervention (eg, healthy eating [−10%; P<.001] vs exercise [+20%, P<.001] relative to health risk assessments), and (4) changes in the number of points offered. Our results demonstrate that reducing the number of points associated with a particular quiz by 10% only led to a 1% decrease in the likelihood of offer response (P<.001) and that each of the other design features had larger impacts on participant retention than did changes in the number of points. Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate that this program, built around the principles of behavioral economics in the form of the ongoing awarding of a small number of reward points instantly following the completion of health interventions, was able to drive significantly higher engagement levels than those demonstrated in previous literature exploring the intersection of mHealth apps and financial incentives. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of incentive matters to user engagement; however, our results indicate that the number of points offered for these reward point–based health interventions is less important than other program design features such as the type of reward points being offered, the timing of intervention and reward offers, and the content of the health interventions in driving continued engagement by users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Brower
- Smith School of Business, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Monica C LaBarge
- Smith School of Business, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Marc S Mitchell
- School of Kinesiology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Integrating Financial Incentives for Viral Load Suppression into HIV Care Coordination Programs: Considerations for Development and Implementation. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2020; 26:471-480. [PMID: 32732721 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Interventions that support durable viral load suppression (VLS) among people living with HIV (PLWH) who face barriers to treatment adherence are needed to maintain optimal individual health, prevent new HIV infections, and advance health equity. Efficacy trials indicate that financial incentives (FIs) are a promising strategy for promoting VLS, although less is known about their implementation in "real-world" settings. This article describes considerations for the development and implementation of FI interventions identified in existing literature, and how they informed the scale-up of a multilevel treatment adherence support program designed to increase VLS among PLWH in New York City. PROGRAM The Undetectables VLS Program comprises a social marketing campaign and a "tool kit" of evidence-based HIV treatment adherence strategies, including quarterly FIs ($100) that patients receive for achieving or maintaining an undetectable viral load (<200 copies/mL; also referred to as VLS). The intervention was developed and pilot tested by Housing Works Community Healthcare and the University of Pennsylvania from 2014 to 2016. Initial findings from the pilot evaluation showed a statistically significant positive effect on VLS. IMPLEMENTATION The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene contracted with 7 agencies across New York City to scale up The Undetectables Program over a 3-year period (2016-2019) by integrating the program into existing services for PLWH. EVALUATION PLANS Quality indicators (eg, percentage of clients who received an FI each quarter; percentage of clients who were virally suppressed at 90 days postenrollment) will be used to measure program performance and impact over time. DISCUSSION Recommendations for implementing FIs for PLWH include packaging FIs with client-centered, evidence-based adherence strategies, incorporating FIs into existing service delivery systems, and obtaining organization-wide buy-in to facilitate their implementation. Implementation science research is needed to identify strategies to effectively implement and sustain evidence-based FI interventions.
Collapse
|
27
|
Enright G, Gyani A, Hyun K, Allman-Farinelli M, Innes-Hughes C, Chen L, Redfern J. What Motivates Engagement in a Community-Based Behavior Change Strategy for Overweight Children? Health Promot Pract 2020; 23:174-184. [PMID: 32713213 DOI: 10.1177/1524839920944859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction. The success of family-based community programs for childhood obesity may be increased by promoting social-cognitive factors that influence motivation and participant engagement. Incentivizing behavior can potentially enhance engagement and encourage behavior change. This research investigated motivators to engagement with a multicomponent incentive-based strategy to improve attendance and health-related behavior change in a family community-based weight management program for overweight and obese children. Method. Qualitative analysis combining; demographic data (n = 512), survey of parents (n = 273), and stakeholder (n = 10) and family interviews (n = 24). Participants were selected from program providers and families participating in an Australian community weight management program during a randomized controlled trial (n = 512 children). Maximum variation sampling (demographics and group characteristics) and inductive thematic analysis were used. Results/Conclusion. Four factors influencing engagement were (1) personal value, (2) achievement, (3) support, and (4) overwhelm. These themes corroborated with social-cognitive factors, fostered by a combination of behavior change components in the program that increased participant accountability and intrinsic motivation. Focusing on autonomous goal planning with parental involvement, tracking of goals, and reviewing of goals may complement existing strategies in child-focused treatment programs. Low-value noncash incentives linked to goal setting for encouraging healthy eating and physical activity were well accepted and may enhance family engagement and attendance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Enright
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alex Gyani
- NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Sydney, New South Wales Australia.,Behavioural Insights Team, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karice Hyun
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Lily Chen
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julie Redfern
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Luong MLN, Hall M, Bennell KL, Kasza J, Harris A, Hinman RS. The Impact of Financial Incentives on Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Health Promot 2020; 35:236-249. [PMID: 32672050 DOI: 10.1177/0890117120940133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of financial incentives on physical activity (PA). DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, 7 other databases, and 2 trial registries until July 17, 2019. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials with adults aged ≥18 years assessing the effect of financial incentives on PA. Any comparator was eligible provided the only difference between groups was the incentive strategy. DATA EXTRACTION Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. Of 5765 records identified, 57 records (51 unique trials; n = 17 773 participants) were included. DATA SYNTHESIS Random-effects models pooling data for each of the 5 PA domains. RESULTS Financial incentives increase leisure time PA (gym or class attendance; standardized mean difference [95% CI], 0.46 [0.28-0.63], n = 5057) and walking behavior (steps walked; 0.25 [0.13-0.36], n = 3254). No change in total minutes of PA (0.52 [-0.09 to 1.12], n = 968), kilocalories expended (0.19 [-0.06 to 0.44], n = 247), or the proportion of participants meeting PA guidelines (risk ratio [95% CI] 1.53 [0.53-4.44], n = 650) postintervention was observed. After intervention has ceased, incentives sustain a slight increase in leisure time PA (0.10 [0.02-0.18], n = 2678) and walking behavior (0.11 [0.00-0.22], n = 2425). CONCLUSIONS Incentives probably improve leisure time PA and walking at intervention end, and small improvements may be sustained over time once incentives have ceased. They lead to little or no difference in kilocalories expended or minutes of PA. It is uncertain whether incentives change the likelihood of meeting PA guidelines because the certainty of the evidence is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- My-Linh Nguyen Luong
- Department of Physiotherapy, 549319Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Hall
- Department of Physiotherapy, 549319Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim L Bennell
- Department of Physiotherapy, 549319Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Kasza
- Biostatistics Unit, 161667School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony Harris
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rana S Hinman
- Department of Physiotherapy, 549319Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee WN, Stück D, Konty K, Rivers C, Brown CR, Zbikowski SM, Foschini L. Large-scale influenza vaccination promotion on a mobile app platform: A randomized controlled trial. Vaccine 2020; 38:3508-3514. [PMID: 31787410 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
While health-care providers have used incentives in an attempt to motivate patients to obtain vaccinations, their effect on vaccination rates has not been systematically evaluated on a large scale. In this study, we examined whether mobile applications may improve population vaccination rates through enhanced communication and incentives education. Our study is the first randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of large-scale messaging combined with individualized incentives on influenza-vaccination rates. In this trial, we delivered messages regarding influenza vaccinations to 50,286 adults, aged 18 through 65, then compared the subsequent vaccination rate, the effectiveness of the message content and the timing. Multiple rounds of messaging occurred over a seven-week period during the 2016 flu season, after which vaccination rates were observed for one week. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three messaging approaches: conspicuous (highlighting the amount of rewards to be received for obtaining a flu shot); generic (promoting vaccinations with no mention of rewards); or no-message. Evidence of vaccination obtainment was indicated by medical and pharmacy claims, augmented by patients self-reporting through the mobile wellness app during the study period. Of the people assigned to receive messaging, 23.2% obtained influenza vaccination, compared to 22.0% of people who obtained vaccination in the no-messaging control arm. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The research revealed that messaging effectiveness decreased after each successive batch sent, suggesting that most participants responsive to messaging would become activated immediately after receiving one alert. Interestingly, in this large-scale study, there were no significant differences between conspicuous incentives and generic messaging, suggesting an important area for future research. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02908893.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Nchih Lee
- Evidation Health, 167 2nd Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94401, United States.
| | - David Stück
- Evidation Health, 167 2nd Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94401, United States.
| | - Kevin Konty
- Evidation Health, 15 Figueroa St., Santa Barbara, CA 93101, United States.
| | - Caitlin Rivers
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 621 E. Pratt Street, Suite 210, Baltimore, MD 21230, United States.
| | - Courtney R Brown
- Humana, 500 W. Main Street, Louisville, KY 40202, United States.
| | | | - Luca Foschini
- Evidation Health, 15 Figueroa St., Santa Barbara, CA 93101, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Variable Magnitude and Frequency Financial Reinforcement is Effective at Increasing Adults' Free-Living Physical Activity. Perspect Behav Sci 2020; 43:515-538. [PMID: 33029578 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-019-00241-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Financial rewards can increase health behaviors, but little research has quantified the effects of different reinforcement schedules on this process. This analysis compares the average moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) associated with six distinct positive reinforcement schedules implemented within a physical activity promotion clinical trial. In this trial, participants (N = 512) wore an accelerometer for 1 year and were prescribed one of two types of MVPA goals: a static 30-min goal or an adaptive goal based on the MVPA produced over the previous 9 days. As participants met goals, they transitioned through a sequence of reinforcement stages, beginning with a continuous-fixed magnitude (CRF-FM), then CRF-variable magnitude (CRF-VM), followed by a series of variable ratio-VM (VR-VM) schedules. The average accumulation of MVPA bouts over the last 24 days of each stage was compared to each other. Average MVPA during stage transitions was also examined. The results indicated that immediate reinforcement resulted in more MVPA relative to a comparison group and that the relative effectiveness of adaptive versus static goals was dependent on the magnitude of daily MVPA goals. Schedule effects were qualitatively different for individuals who frequently met their daily goals (Large Intervention Effect subgroup) versus those who did not (Small Intervention Effect subgroup). For the Large Intervention Effect group, the CRF-VM schedule produced the most MVPA, in particular within the adaptive goal condition, with increases observed immediately upon encountering this schedule. In contrast, the CRF-FM schedule produced small amounts of MVPA. This pattern was reversed for the Small Intervention Effect subgroup, where the most MVPA was associated with the CRF-FM stage. Future interventions should focus on discriminating small versus large intervention effects as quickly as possible so that the optimal reinforcement schedule can be used.
Collapse
|
31
|
Molema CCM, Wendel-Vos GCW, Ter Schegget S, Schuit AJ, van de Goor LAM. Perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of a combined lifestyle intervention with a financial incentive for chronically ill patients. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2019; 20:137. [PMID: 31627716 PMCID: PMC6798404 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-1025-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to describe barriers and facilitators of the implementation of a combined lifestyle intervention (CLI) in primary care for patients with chronic disease. The aim of CLI to help patients to create a healthy lifestyle and to maintain this healthy lifestyle. During a CLI a patient receives advice and counselling to improve health-related behavior such as physical activity and diet. Special attention was given to the influence of adding a health promoting financial incentive (HPFI) for the participants to the CLI. METHODS Twenty-four semi-structured interviews within six care groups were performed between July and October 2017. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded by two researchers independently. RESULTS Respondents mentioned several preferred characteristics of the CLI such as easy accessibility of the intervention site and the presence of health care professionals during exercise sessions. Moreover, factors that could influence implementation (such as attitude of the health care professionals) and preconditions for a successful implementation of a CLI (such as structural funding and good infrastructure) were identified. Overall, positive HPFIs (e.g. a reward) were preferred over negative HPFIs (e.g. a fine). According to the respondents, HPFIs could positively influence the degree of participation, and break down barriers for participating in and finishing the CLI. CONCLUSIONS Multiple barriers and facilitators for successful implementation of a CLI were identified. For successful implementing CLIs, a positive attitude of all stakeholders is essential and specific preconditions should be fulfilled. With regard to adding a HPFI, more research is needed to identify the attitude of specific target groups towards an HPFI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C C M Molema
- Department of Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands. .,Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - G C W Wendel-Vos
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - S Ter Schegget
- Department of Health Science, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A J Schuit
- Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - L A M van de Goor
- Department of Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Robertson L, Gendall P, Hoek J, Marsh L, McGee R. Perceptions of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation: A Survey of Smokers in a Country With an Endgame Goal. Nicotine Tob Res 2019; 20:1481-1488. [PMID: 29253215 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Financial incentives can support smoking cessation, yet low acceptability may limit the wider implementation of such schemes. Few studies have examined how smokers view financial-incentive interventions aimed at reducing smoking prevalence. Methods We recruited a sample of 623 smokers from an internet panel to a survey assessing support for, and perceived effectiveness of, financial incentives for smoking cessation. We used descriptive statistics, plus logistic regression, to test associations between demographics and smoking, and support. We used qualitative content analysis to analyze open-ended responses to a question that invited respondents to comment on financial incentives. Results Financial incentives were supported by 38.4% of smokers; 42.2% did not support and 19.4% had no opinion. Support was higher among heavy (OR = 3.96, 95% CI = 2.39 to 6.58) and moderate smokers (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.49), and those with a recent quit attempt (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.04 to 2.07). Support was strongly associated with perceived effectiveness. A Government-funded reward-only scheme was seen as the most acceptable option (preferred by 26.6% of participants), followed by a Government-funded deposit-based scheme (20.6%); few respondents supported employer-funded schemes. Open-ended responses (n = 301) indicated three overarching themes expressing opposition to financial incentives: smokers' individual responsibility for quitting, concerns about abuse of an incentive scheme, and concerns about unfairness. Conclusion Even amongst those who would benefit from schemes designed to reward smokers for quitting, support for such schemes is muted, despite the evidence of their effectiveness. Media advocacy and health education could be used to increase the understanding of, and support for, financial incentives for smoking cessation. Implications Given the absolute effectiveness and cost effectiveness of financial-incentive schemes for smoking cessation amongst pregnant smokers and in workplaces, implementing such schemes at a national-level could help reduce overall smoking prevalence and contribute to endgame goals. Our study found that similar proportions of smokers supported and opposed financial-incentive schemes and suggests that much of the opposition was underpinned by information gaps, which could be addressed using education and media advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Robertson
- Cancer Society Social & Behavioural Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, South Island, New Zealand
| | - Philip Gendall
- Department of Marketing, University of Otago, South Island, New Zealand
| | - Janet Hoek
- Department of Marketing, University of Otago, South Island, New Zealand
| | - Louise Marsh
- Cancer Society Social & Behavioural Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, South Island, New Zealand
| | - Rob McGee
- Cancer Society Social & Behavioural Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, South Island, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Forberger S, Reisch L, Kampfmann T, Zeeb H. Nudging to move: a scoping review of the use of choice architecture interventions to promote physical activity in the general population. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2019; 16:77. [PMID: 31481090 PMCID: PMC6724306 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-019-0844-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nudges are used to alter lifestyles and thus curb the rise of non-communicable diseases. Physical activity is a core prevention strategy to reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases. This paper aims to (1) give an overview of the scope of interventions using choice architecture techniques to promote physical activity at the population levels and (2) identify research gaps by analysing the different approaches in terms of class and type of intervention used. Methods A systematic electronic database search was combined with snowball citation sampling of a starter set of publications to search for studies published through October 2018 reporting interventions to promote physical activity at the population level using choice architecture techniques. The methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute for Scoping Reviews was applied. Results In all, 35 publications were included. Most of the interventions used point-of-choice prompts tested at railway stations, shopping malls and airports (N = 27). Eight studies were online studies. While all studies were aimed at the general population, details, if reported at all, were vague and basic. All studies focused on individual-level lifestyle behaviour. None of the studies attempted to alter population-based lifestyle behaviour. Online and “real-world” approaches were rarely combined. Neither, interventions targeting meso- and macro-level structures nor combinations of individual-level and specific meso- or macro-level interventions were found. Conclusion Nudging is in principle an effective approach to promote physical activity within the general population. However, there are large gaps in research. Available opportunities have not yet been exhausted. Further research is needed that is explicitly based on behavioural insights and covering the full range of nudging approaches, particularly focussing on theoretical developments, practical feasibility tests and scale-up activities. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-019-0844-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Forberger
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
| | - L Reisch
- Leibniz-Chair, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,Copenhagen Business School, MSC, Dalgas Have 15, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - T Kampfmann
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - H Zeeb
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Takada T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Shimizu S, Nihata K, Miyashita J, Azuma T, Hayashi M, Fukuhara S. Determinants of incentive preferences for health behavior change in Japan. Health Promot Int 2019; 34:760-769. [PMID: 29788091 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/day031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Interest in the use of incentives to promote health behavior change has been growing worldwide. However, to develop an effective incentive program, accurate information regarding individual preferences is essential. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify determinants of incentive preferences for health behavior change. A self-completed questionnaire survey regarding incentives for health behavior change was conducted in a Japanese village in 2015. The outcome measures were individual preferences for features of incentives, including item, frequency, type and value. The types of incentives were defined as follows: assured-type (given for participation); effort-type (given if participants make some kind of effort); and outcome-type (given if participants make achievements decided a priori). The associations with respondents' sex, age, presence of lifestyle-related disease and stage in the transtheoretical model of health behavior change were investigated using multivariate analysis. A total of 1469 residents responded to the survey. Significant associations with preference for different incentive features were found as follows: for monetary items, female and elderly; for high frequency, female and maintenance stage; for effort-type, male, action stage and contemplation stage; and for outcome-type, maintenance stage and action stage. Our results appeared to identify determinants of incentive preferences for health behavior change. These findings are expected to promote the development of an incentive program more in tune with individual preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiko Takada
- Department of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, 2-1 Toyochi Kamiyajiro, Shirakawa, Fukushima, Japan.,Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shingo Fukuma
- Department of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, 2-1 Toyochi Kamiyajiro, Shirakawa, Fukushima, Japan.,Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.,Center for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence (CIRC2LE), Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, Japan.,Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT), Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yosuke Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.,Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT), Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Sayaka Shimizu
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kakuya Nihata
- Center for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence (CIRC2LE), Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Jun Miyashita
- Department of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, 2-1 Toyochi Kamiyajiro, Shirakawa, Fukushima, Japan.,Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Teruhisa Azuma
- Department of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, 2-1 Toyochi Kamiyajiro, Shirakawa, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Michio Hayashi
- Department of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, 2-1 Toyochi Kamiyajiro, Shirakawa, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Shunichi Fukuhara
- Department of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, 2-1 Toyochi Kamiyajiro, Shirakawa, Fukushima, Japan.,Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.,Center for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence (CIRC2LE), Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Molema C, Veldwijk J, Wendel-Vos W, de Wit A, van de Goor I, Schuit J. Chronically ill patients' preferences for a financial incentive in a lifestyle intervention. Results of a discrete choice experiment. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0219112. [PMID: 31344135 PMCID: PMC6657823 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The preferences of diabetes type 2 patients and cardiovascular disease patients for a financial incentive added to a specified combined lifestyle intervention were investigated. METHODS A discrete choice experiment questionnaire was filled out by 290 diabetes type 2 patients (response rate 29.9%). Panel-mixed-logit models were used to estimate the preferences for a financial incentive. Potential uptake rates of different financial incentives and relative importance scores of the included attributes were estimated. Included attributes and levels were: form of the incentive (cash money and different types of vouchers), value of the incentive (ranging from 15 to 100 euros), moment the incentive is received (start, halfway, after finishing the intervention) and prerequisite for receiving the incentive (registration, attendance or results at group or individual level). RESULTS Prerequisites for receiving the financial incentive were the most important attribute, according to the respondents. Potential uptake rates for different financial incentives ranged between 37.9% and 58.8%. The latter uptake rate was associated with a financial incentive consisting of cash money with a value of €100 that is handed out after completing the lifestyle program with the prerequisite that the participant attended at least 75% of the scheduled meetings. CONCLUSIONS The potential uptake of the different financial incentives varied between 37.9% and 58.8%. The value of the incentive does not significantly influence the potential uptake. However, the potential uptake and associated potential effect of the financial incentive is influenced by the type of financial incentive. The preferred type of incentive is €100 in cash money, awarded after completing the lifestyle program if the participant attended at least 75% of the scheduled meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Molema
- Tilburg University, Department of Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg, the Netherlands
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Jorien Veldwijk
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Wanda Wendel-Vos
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Ardine de Wit
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ien van de Goor
- Tilburg University, Department of Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Jantine Schuit
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- VU University, Department of Health Science and EMGO institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Notley C, Gentry S, Livingstone‐Banks J, Bauld L, Perera R, Hartmann‐Boyce J. Incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 7:CD004307. [PMID: 31313293 PMCID: PMC6635501 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004307.pub6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial incentives, monetary or vouchers, are widely used in an attempt to precipitate, reinforce and sustain behaviour change, including smoking cessation. They have been used in workplaces, in clinics and hospitals, and within community programmes. OBJECTIVES To determine the long-term effect of incentives and contingency management programmes for smoking cessation. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialised Register, clinicaltrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). The most recent searches were conducted in July 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered only randomised controlled trials, allocating individuals, workplaces, groups within workplaces, or communities to smoking cessation incentive schemes or control conditions. We included studies in a mixed-population setting (e.g. community, work-, clinic- or institution-based), and also studies in pregnant smokers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. The primary outcome measure in the mixed-population studies was abstinence from smoking at longest follow-up (at least six months from the start of the intervention). In the trials of pregnant women we used abstinence measured at the longest follow-up, and at least to the end of the pregnancy. Where available, we pooled outcome data using a Mantel-Haenzel random-effects model, with results reported as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using adjusted estimates for cluster-randomised trials. We analysed studies carried out in mixed populations separately from those carried out in pregnant populations. MAIN RESULTS Thirty-three mixed-population studies met our inclusion criteria, covering more than 21,600 participants; 16 of these are new to this version of the review. Studies were set in varying locations, including community settings, clinics or health centres, workplaces, and outpatient drug clinics. We judged eight studies to be at low risk of bias, and 10 to be at high risk of bias, with the rest at unclear risk. Twenty-four of the trials were run in the USA, two in Thailand and one in the Phillipines. The rest were European. Incentives offered included cash payments or vouchers for goods and groceries, offered directly or collected and redeemable online. The pooled RR for quitting with incentives at longest follow-up (six months or more) compared with controls was 1.49 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.73; 31 RCTs, adjusted N = 20,097; I2 = 33%). Results were not sensitive to the exclusion of six studies where an incentive for cessation was offered at long-term follow up (result excluding those studies: RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.69; 25 RCTs; adjusted N = 17,058; I2 = 36%), suggesting the impact of incentives continues for at least some time after incentives cease.Although not always clearly reported, the total financial amount of incentives varied considerably between trials, from zero (self-deposits), to a range of between USD 45 and USD 1185. There was no clear direction of effect between trials offering low or high total value of incentives, nor those encouraging redeemable self-deposits.We included 10 studies of 2571 pregnant women. We judged two studies to be at low risk of bias, one at high risk of bias, and seven at unclear risk. When pooled, the nine trials with usable data (eight conducted in the USA and one in the UK), delivered an RR at longest follow-up (up to 24 weeks post-partum) of 2.38 (95% CI 1.54 to 3.69; N = 2273; I2 = 41%), in favour of incentives. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall there is high-certainty evidence that incentives improve smoking cessation rates at long-term follow-up in mixed population studies. The effectiveness of incentives appears to be sustained even when the last follow-up occurs after the withdrawal of incentives. There is also moderate-certainty evidence, limited by some concerns about risks of bias, that incentive schemes conducted among pregnant smokers improve smoking cessation rates, both at the end of pregnancy and post-partum. Current and future research might explore more precisely differences between trials offering low or high cash incentives and self-incentives (deposits), within a variety of smoking populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Notley
- University of East AngliaNorwich Medical SchoolNorwichUK
| | - Sarah Gentry
- University of East AngliaNorwich Medical SchoolNorwichUK
| | | | - Linda Bauld
- University of EdinburghUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary MedicineEdinburghUK
| | - Rafael Perera
- University of OxfordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesOxfordUK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Jay M, Orstad SL, Wali S, Wylie-Rosett J, Tseng CH, Sweat V, Wittleder S, Shu SB, Goldstein NJ, Ladapo JA. Goal-directed versus outcome-based financial incentives for weight loss among low-income patients with obesity: rationale and design of the Financial Incentives foR Weight Reduction (FIReWoRk) randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025278. [PMID: 30962231 PMCID: PMC6500238 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Obesity is a major public health challenge and exacerbates economic disparities through employment discrimination and increased personal health expenditures. Financial incentives for weight management may intensify individuals' utilisation of evidence-based behavioural strategies while addressing obesity-related economic disparities in low-income populations. Trials have focused on testing incentives contingent on achieving weight loss outcomes. However, based on social cognitive and self-determination theories, providing incentives for achieving intermediate behavioural goals may be more sustainable than incentivising outcomes if they enhance an individual's skills and self-efficacy for maintaining long-term weight loss. The objective of this paper is to describe the rationale and design of the Financial Incentives foR Weight Reduction study, a randomised controlled trial to test the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two financial incentive strategies for weight loss (goal directed vs outcome based) among low-income adults with obesity, as well as compared with the provision of health behaviour change resources alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We are recruiting 795 adults, aged 18-70 years with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, from three primary care clinics serving residents of socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods in New York City and Los Angeles. All participants receive a 1-year commercial weight loss programme membership, self-monitoring tools (bathroom scale, food journal and Fitbit Alta HR), health education and monthly check-in visits. In addition to these resources, those in the two intervention groups can earn up to $750 over 6 months for: (1) participating in an intensive weight management programme, self-monitoring weight and diet and meeting physical activity guidelines (goal-directed arm); or (2) a ≥1.5% to ≥5% reduction in baseline weight (outcome-based arm). To maximise incentive efficacy, we incorporate concepts from behavioural economics, including immediacy of payments and framing feedback to elicit regret aversion. We will use generalised mixed effect models for repeated measures to examine intervention effects on weight at 6, 9 and 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Human research protection committees at New York University School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) David Geffen School of Medicine and Olive-View-UCLA Medical Center granted ethics approval. We will disseminate the results of this research via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and meetings with stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03157713.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Jay
- Departments of Medicine and Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stephanie L Orstad
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Soma Wali
- Department of Medicine, Olive View-University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center, Sylmar, California, USA
| | - Judith Wylie-Rosett
- Division of Health Promotion and Nutrition Research, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Chi-Hong Tseng
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victoria Sweat
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sandra Wittleder
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Suzanne B Shu
- Anderson School of Management at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Noah J Goldstein
- Anderson School of Management at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joseph A Ladapo
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Teixeira-Poit SM, Treiman KA, Li L, Hoerger TJ, Carmody D, Tardif-Douglin M. Perceived Impact of Incentives for Chronic Disease Prevention. Am J Prev Med 2019; 56:563-570. [PMID: 30898222 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study evaluates the effect of program and incentive characteristics on satisfaction with incentives and perceived impact of incentives on behavior change among Medicaid beneficiaries who participated in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicaid Incentives for Prevention of Chronic Diseases program. METHODS In 2014-2015, an English- and Spanish-language survey was administered to Medicaid Incentives for Prevention of Chronic Diseases program participants about their satisfaction with incentives and perceived impact of incentives. Completed surveys were received from 2,276 eligible sample members (response rate=52.7%). In 2016-2017, multilevel, multivariable, ordinal logistic regression models were performed to examine program characteristics that predict outcomes, while controlling for respondent characteristics. RESULTS Medicaid Incentives for Prevention of Chronic Diseases participants were satisfied with program incentives. Most survey respondents strongly agreed that they liked getting incentives for taking care of their health (78%), they were happy with the incentives overall (75%), the incentives were fair (73%), and they liked how often they received incentives (67%). Participants in programs delivered by telephone reported higher satisfaction with incentives compared with those in programs delivered in person. However, participants in programs delivered both in person and by telephone were more likely to perceive a positive impact of incentives. Incentive form was a significant predictor of satisfaction with incentives but not of incentive impact. Dollar amount of incentives influenced satisfaction with incentives and impact of incentives. CONCLUSIONS Program delivery method, incentive form, and incentive magnitude are important characteristics to consider when designing incentive programs. Incentive programs can consider providing modest incentive amounts to achieve self-reported impact on behavior change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Teixeira-Poit
- Department of Social Work and Sociology, College of Health and Human Sciences, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, North Carolina.
| | - Katherine A Treiman
- Center for Communication Science, Public Health Research Division, RTI International, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Lei Li
- Statistics and Epidemiology Unit, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Thomas J Hoerger
- Health Economics, Public Health Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | | | - Miriam Tardif-Douglin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wright DR, Saelens BE, Fontes A, Lavelle TA. Assessment of Parents' Preferences for Incentives to Promote Engagement in Family-Based Childhood Obesity Treatment. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e191490. [PMID: 30924902 PMCID: PMC6450425 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Family-based treatment (FBT) is recommended for childhood obesity, but even when sought, attrition is high. Extrinsic incentives, which have been effective for improving adult health, could improve FBT engagement. Objective To assess parents' preferences for FBT incentives. Design, Setting, and Participants Survey study of parents of children aged 6 to 17 years with obesity (body mass index in ≥95th percentile for age and sex). Parents' preferences for FBT incentive program attributes were assessed in a discrete choice experiment conducted using a nationally representative, web-based survey in March 2018. Attributes included (1) the monetary value of the incentive, (2) the payment structure, (3) the goal being incentivized, and (4) the person(s) being incentivized. A fractional factorial design was used to create a set of profiles representing hypothetical FBT incentives. Parents were presented with 10 pairs of profiles and asked which would most motivate them in FBT. Parents were also asked about preferences between a small, guaranteed incentive and a lottery for a large incentive. Analyses used a hierarchical Bayesian model and linear regressions. Main Outcomes and Measures Parents' preference for different incentive program attributes and levels. Results The nationally representative survey had a 41.4% eligibility rate (n = 339) and a 89.7% completion rate (n = 304). A total of 53.3% of respondents (weighted percentage) were non-Hispanic white, 42.6% had an annual household income less than $50 000, and 28.3% had a bachelor's degree. Parents preferred higher incentives, although they were willing to accept lower-value incentives if both the parent and the child (vs the child alone) were required to meet the goal (mean difference [MD], -$108; 95% CI, -$132 to -$84), if the incentive used a gain-framed vs loss-framed payment structure (MD, -$72; 95% CI, -$85 to -$59), and if physical activity goals were incentivized over weight loss (MD, -$63; 95% CI, -$82 to -$44) or dietary monitoring (MD, -$5; 95% CI, -$1 to $28). Only 20.6% of parents preferred a lottery over a guaranteed payment. Preferences did not vary among demographic or health subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, parent-stated preferences did not align with FBT best practices or behavioral economic theory. A randomized clinical trial could examine whether aligning incentives with preferences or best practices would maximize FBT engagement and behavior change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davene R. Wright
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
- Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Brian E. Saelens
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
- Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Angela Fontes
- NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tara A. Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ochieng CA, Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Batura N, Odhiambo A, Shannon G, Copas A, Palmer T, Dickin S, Noel S, Fielding M, Onyango S, Odera S, Eleveld A, Mwaki A, Vanhuyse F, Skordis J. Conditional cash transfers to retain rural Kenyan women in the continuum of care during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019; 20:152. [PMID: 30823886 PMCID: PMC6397480 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3224-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antenatal care (ANC), facility delivery and postnatal care (PNC) are proven to reduce maternal and child mortality and morbidity in high-burden settings. However, few pregnant rural women use these services sufficiently. This study aims to assess the impact, cost-effectiveness and scalability of conditional cash transfers to promote increased contact between pregnant women or women who have recently given birth and the formal healthcare system in Kenya. Methods The intervention tested is a conditional cash transfer to women for ANC health visits, a facility birth and PNC visits until their newborn baby reaches 1 year of age. The study is a cluster randomized controlled trial in Siaya County, Kenya. The trial clusters are 48 randomly selected public primary health facilities, 24 of which are in the intervention arm of the study and 24 in the control arm. The unit of randomization is the health facility. A target sample of 7200 study participants comprises pregnant women identified and recruited at their first ANC visit over a 12-month recruitment period and their subsequent newborns. All pregnant women attending one of the selected trial facilities for their first ANC visit during the recruitment period are eligible for the trial and invited to participate. Enrolled mothers are followed up at all health visits during their pregnancy, at facility delivery and for a number of visits after delivery. They are also contacted at three additional time points after enrolling in the study: 5–10days after enrolment, 6 months after the expected delivery date and 12 27 months after birth. If they have not delivered in a facility, there is an additional follow-up 2 wees after the expected due date. The impact of the conditional cash transfers on maternal healthcare services and utilization will be measured by the trial’s primary outcomes: the proportion of all eligible ANC visits made during pregnancy, delivery at a health facility, the proportion of all eligible PNC visits attended, the proportion of referrals attended during the pregnancy and the postnatal period, and the proportion of eligible child immunization appointments attended. Secondary outcomes include; health screening and infection control, live birth, maternal and child survival 48 h after delivery, exclusive breastfeeding, post-partum contraceptive use and maternal and newborn morbidity. Data sources for the measurement of outcomes include routine health records, an electronic card-reader system and telephone surveys and focus group discussions. A full economic evaluation will be conducted to assess the cost of delivery and cost effectiveness of the intervention and the benefit incidence and equity impact of trial activities and outcomes. Discussion This trial will contribute to evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conditional cash transfers in facilitating health visits and promoting maternal and child health in rural Kenya and in other comparable contexts. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03021070. Registered on 13 January 2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3224-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A Ochieng
- Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnegatan 87D, Box 24218, 10451, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli
- UCL Institute for Global Health, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Neha Batura
- UCL Institute for Global Health, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Aloyce Odhiambo
- Safe Water and AIDS Project (SWAP), P.O. Box 3323, Kisumu, 40100, Kenya
| | - Geordan Shannon
- UCL Institute for Global Health, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Andrew Copas
- UCL Institute for Global Health, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Tom Palmer
- UCL Institute for Global Health, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Sarah Dickin
- Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnegatan 87D, Box 24218, 10451, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stacey Noel
- Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnegatan 87D, Box 24218, 10451, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Matthew Fielding
- Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnegatan 87D, Box 24218, 10451, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sangoro Onyango
- Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnegatan 87D, Box 24218, 10451, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sarah Odera
- Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnegatan 87D, Box 24218, 10451, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alie Eleveld
- Safe Water and AIDS Project (SWAP), P.O. Box 3323, Kisumu, 40100, Kenya
| | - Alex Mwaki
- Safe Water and AIDS Project (SWAP), P.O. Box 3323, Kisumu, 40100, Kenya
| | - Fedra Vanhuyse
- Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnegatan 87D, Box 24218, 10451, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Jolene Skordis
- UCL Institute for Global Health, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Competitions might encourage people to undertake and/or reinforce behaviour change, including smoking cessation. Competitions involve individuals or groups having the opportunity to win a prize following successful cessation, either through direct competition or by entry into a lottery or raffle. OBJECTIVES To determine whether competitions lead to higher long-term smoking quit rates. We also aimed to examine the impact on the population, the costs, and the unintended consequences of smoking cessation competitions. SEARCH METHODS This review has merged two previous Cochrane reviews. Here we include studies testing competitions from the reviews 'Competitions and incentives for smoking cessation' and 'Quit & Win interventions for smoking cessation'. We updated the evidence by searching the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialized Register in June 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), allocating individuals, workplaces, groups within workplaces, or communities to experimental or control conditions. We also considered controlled studies with baseline and post-intervention measures in which participants were assigned to interventions by the investigators. Participants were smokers, of any age and gender, in any setting. Eligible interventions were contests, competitions, lotteries, and raffles, to reward cessation and continuous abstinence in smoking cessation programmes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS For this update, data from new studies were extracted independently by two review authors. The primary outcome measure was abstinence from smoking at least six months from the start of the intervention. We performed meta-analyses to pool study effects where suitable data were available and where the effect of the competition component could be separated from that of other intervention components, and report other findings narratively. MAIN RESULTS Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria. Five investigated performance-based reward, where groups of smokers competed against each other to win a prize (N = 915). The remaining 15 used performance-based eligibility, where cessation resulted in entry into a prize draw (N = 10,580). Five of these used Quit & Win contests (N = 4282), of which three were population-level interventions. Fourteen studies were RCTs, and the remainder quasi-randomized or controlled trials. Six had suitable abstinence data for a meta-analysis, which did not show evidence of effectiveness of performance-based eligibility interventions (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.74, N = 3201, I2 = 57%). No trials that used performance-based rewards found a beneficial effect of the intervention on long-term quit rates.The three population-level Quit & Win studies found higher smoking cessation rates in the intervention group (4% to 16.9%) than the control group at long-term follow-up, but none were RCTs and all had important between-group differences in baseline characteristics. These studies suggested that fewer than one in 500 smokers would quit because of the contest.Reported unintended consequences in all sets of studies generally related to discrepancies between self-reported smoking status and biochemically-verified smoking status. More serious adverse events were not attributed to the competition intervention.Using the GRADE system we rated the overall quality of the evidence for smoking cessation as 'very low', because of the high and unclear risk of bias associated with the included studies, substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, and the limited population investigated. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS At present, it is impossible to draw any firm conclusions about the effectiveness, or a lack of it, of smoking cessation competitions. This is due to a lack of well-designed comparative studies. Smoking cessation competitions have not been shown to enhance long-term cessation rates. The limited evidence suggesting that population-based Quit & Win contests at local and regional level might deliver quit rates above baseline community rates has not been tested adequately using rigorous study designs. It is also unclear whether the value or frequency of possible cash reward schedules influence the success of competitions. Future studies should be designed to compensate for the substantial biases in the current evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Fanshawe
- University of OxfordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesOxfordUK
| | | | - Rafael Perera
- University of OxfordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesOxfordUK
| | - Nicola Lindson
- University of OxfordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesOxfordUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Faulkner G, Dale LP, Lau E. Examining the use of loyalty point incentives to encourage health and fitness centre participation. Prev Med Rep 2019; 14:100831. [PMID: 30886815 PMCID: PMC6403079 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2017] [Revised: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
A unique financial incentive intervention was conducted in Canada, where YMCA members were offered loyalty points (Air Miles Reward Miles) to encourage visits to YMCA Health and Fitness Centres. The purpose of this evaluation study was to determine if YMCA members would participate in a loyalty point incentive program and if the weekly YMCA visit rates differed between Air Miles collectors and non-collectors. YMCA swipe data were collected from 2012 to 2016, including 12 months pre-program (baseline data), 36 months during the intervention period, and 3 months post-program. The final analyses, conducted in 2017, included 459,146 participants from 13 YMCA locations. Quasi-Poisson regression models were used to compare the weekly visit rates between Air Miles collectors and non-collectors. Of the 459,146 participants, 6.4% (n = 29,449) registered their Air Miles card with their YMCA membership (Air Miles collectors). Average weekly visit rates over the entire study period were significantly higher (1.37 to 3.84 times) among the Air Miles collector group than those in the non-collector group, but there was no evidence that incentives were associated with increased YMCA visits when adjusting for the pre-program period. This research demonstrated that incentives are a practical and acceptable public health strategy in Canada. More research is needed into how to harness the reach of loyalty point providers such as Air Miles, and how incentive-based programs should be optimally designed and delivered (e.g., type, timing, and magnitude of incentive). Loyalty points are popular and are a less expensive type of financial incentive. Air Miles Reward Miles were offered to YMCA members to increase visits to Health and Fitness Centers. Average weekly visit rates significantly higher among Air Miles collectors both prior to and during the incentive period. No association was found between adoption of the Air Miles incentive and increased YMCA visits when adjusting for baseline. More research is needed into how incentive programs should be optimally designed and delivered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy Faulkner
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Erica Lau
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Miranda JJ, Lazo-Porras M, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Pesantes MA, Diez-Canseco F, Cornejo SDP, Trujillo AJ. The effect of individual and mixed rewards on diabetes management: A feasibility randomized controlled trial. Wellcome Open Res 2019; 3:139. [PMID: 30662958 PMCID: PMC6325609 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14824.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Incentives play a role in introducing health-related benefits, but no interventions using mixed incentives, i.e. a combination of individual and group incentives, have been tested in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We evaluated the feasibility of implementing individual- and mixed-incentives, with and without a supportive partner, on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) control and weight loss among patients with T2DM. Methods: This is a feasibility, sex-stratified, single-blinded, randomized controlled study in individuals with T2DM. All participants received diabetes education and tailored goal setting for weight and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Participants were randomly assigned into three arms: individual incentives (Arm 1), mixed incentives-altruism (Arm 2), and mixed incentives-cooperation (Arm 3). Participants were accompanied by a diabetes educator every other week to monitor targets, and the intervention period lasted 3 months. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c at 3 months from baseline. Weight and change body mass index (BMI) were considered as secondary outcomes. Results: Out of 783 patients screened, a total of 54 participants, 18 per study arm, were enrolled and 44 (82%) completed the 3-month follow-up. Mean baseline HbA1c values were 8.5%, 7.9% and 8.2% in Arm 1, Arm 2, and Arm 3, respectively. At 3 months, participants in all three study arms showed reductions in HbA1c ranging from -0.9% in Arm 2 to -1.4% in Arm 1. Weight and BMI also showed reductions. Conclusions: Individual and mixed cash incentives show important reductions in HbA1c, weight and BMI in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after 3 months. Recruitment and uptake of the intervention were successfully accomplished demonstrating feasibility to conduct larger effectiveness studies to test individual and mixed economic incentives for diabetes management. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02891382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Jaime Miranda
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
- School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - María Lazo-Porras
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - M. Amalia Pesantes
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Francisco Diez-Canseco
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | | | - Antonio J. Trujillo
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Adams MA, Ohri-Vachaspati P, Richards TJ, Todd M, Bruening M. Design and rationale for evaluating salad bars and students' fruit and vegetable consumption: A cluster randomized factorial trial with objective assessments. Contemp Clin Trials 2019; 77:37-45. [PMID: 30572161 PMCID: PMC6392069 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Building healthy fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption habits early in life is critical for primary prevention. However, U.S. youth do not come close to meeting national recommendations for FV intake. School-lunch salad bars are one of the most heavily promoted ways to meet FV guidelines. Contrary to popular belief, no rigorous randomized trials have examined whether salad bars increase students' FV consumption. This paper describes the design and rationale of a federally funded trial to evaluate whether introducing salad bars in elementary, middle, and high schools affects students' FV consumption and waste during lunch. A cluster factorial randomized trial will test new salad bars against waitlist controls, with and without an additional marketing intervention (N = 36 schools, N = 6804 students: n = 12 elementary, n = 12 middle and n = 12 high schools). Objective plate waste measurements of individual student's selection of FVs, consumption, and waste will be conducted using digital scales. Primary aim includes comparing FV consumption in schools without salad bars to those with new salad bars by grade level. Secondary aims include: a) whether FV marketing impacts the success of salad bars for FV consumption; b) whether salad bars differentially result in more FV waste compared to traditional serving methods; c) cost-benefit of using salad bars for consumption over traditional serving methods. When complete, this study stands to be one of the most definitive on the effectiveness of salad bars and contextual factors impacting their success. Findings will provide evidence for how to best spend limited federal dollars to improve FV intake in schools. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03283033 (date of registration: 9/14/2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Adams
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 425 N. 5th Street, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
| | - Punam Ohri-Vachaspati
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 425 N. 5th Street, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
| | - Timothy J Richards
- W. P. Carey Morrison School of Agribusiness, Arizona State University, 7231 E. Sonoran Arroyo Mall, Mesa, AZ 85212, United States.
| | - Michael Todd
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 N. Third Street Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States.
| | - Meg Bruening
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 425 N. 5th Street, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Miranda JJ, Lazo-Porras M, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Pesantes MA, Diez-Canseco F, Cornejo SDP, Trujillo AJ. The effect of individual and mixed rewards on diabetes management: A feasibility randomized controlled trial. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:139. [PMID: 30662958 PMCID: PMC6325609 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14824.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Incentives play a role in introducing health-related benefits, but no interventions using mixed incentives, i.e. a combination of individual and group incentives, have been tested in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We evaluated the feasibility of implementing individual- and mixed-incentives, with and without a supportive partner, on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) control and weight loss among patients with T2DM. Methods: This is a feasibility, sex-stratified, single-blinded, randomized controlled study in individuals with T2DM. All participants received diabetes education and tailored goal setting for weight and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Participants were randomly assigned into three arms: individual incentives (Arm 1), mixed incentives-altruism (Arm 2), and mixed incentives-cooperation (Arm 3). Participants were accompanied by a diabetes educator every other week to monitor targets, and the intervention period lasted 3 months. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c at 3 months from baseline. Weight and change body mass index (BMI) were considered as secondary outcomes. Results: Out of 783 patients screened, a total of 54 participants, 18 per study arm, were enrolled and 44 (82%) completed the 3-month follow-up. Mean baseline HbA1c values were 8.5%, 7.9% and 8.2% in Arm 1, Arm 2, and Arm 3, respectively. At 3 months, participants in all three study arms showed reductions in HbA1c ranging from -0.9% in Arm 2 to -1.4% in Arm 1. Weight and BMI also showed reductions. Conclusions: Individual and mixed cash incentives show important reductions in HbA1c, weight and BMI in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after 3 months. Recruitment and uptake of the intervention were successfully accomplished demonstrating feasibility to conduct larger effectiveness studies to test individual and mixed economic incentives for diabetes management. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02891382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Jaime Miranda
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
- School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - María Lazo-Porras
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - M. Amalia Pesantes
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Francisco Diez-Canseco
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | | | - Antonio J. Trujillo
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Miranda JJ, Lazo-Porras M, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Pesantes MA, Diez-Canseco F, Cornejo SDP, Trujillo AJ. The effect of individual and mixed rewards on diabetes management: A feasibility randomized controlled trial. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:139. [PMID: 30662958 PMCID: PMC6325609 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14824.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Incentives play a role in introducing health-related benefits, but no interventions using mixed incentives, i.e. a combination of individual and group incentives, have been tested in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We evaluated the feasibility of implementing individual- and mixed-incentives, with and without a supportive partner, on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) control and weight loss among patients with T2DM. Methods: This is a feasibility, sex-stratified, single-blinded, randomized controlled study in individuals with T2DM. All participants received diabetes education and tailored goal setting for weight and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Participants were randomly assigned into three arms: individual incentives (Arm 1), mixed incentives-altruism (Arm 2), and mixed incentives-cooperation (Arm 3). Participants were accompanied by a diabetes educator every other week to monitor targets, and the intervention period lasted 3 months. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c at 3 months from baseline. Weight and change body mass index (BMI) were considered as secondary outcomes. Results: Out of 783 patients screened, a total of 54 participants, 18 per study arm, were enrolled and 44 (82%) completed the 3-month follow-up. Mean baseline HbA1c values were 8.5%, 7.9% and 8.2% in Arm 1, Arm 2, and Arm 3, respectively. At 3 months, participants in all three study arms showed reductions in HbA1c ranging from -0.9% in Arm 2 to -1.4% in Arm 1. Weight and BMI also showed reductions. Conclusions: Individual and mixed cash incentives show important reductions in HbA1c, weight and BMI in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after 3 months. Recruitment and uptake of the intervention were successfully accomplished demonstrating feasibility to conduct larger effectiveness studies to test individual and mixed economic incentives for diabetes management. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02891382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Jaime Miranda
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
- School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - María Lazo-Porras
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - M. Amalia Pesantes
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Francisco Diez-Canseco
- CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | | | - Antonio J. Trujillo
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mitchell M, White L, Lau E, Leahey T, Adams MA, Faulkner G. Evaluating the Carrot Rewards App, a Population-Level Incentive-Based Intervention Promoting Step Counts Across Two Canadian Provinces: Quasi-Experimental Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6:e178. [PMID: 30148712 PMCID: PMC6231836 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Carrot Rewards app was developed as part of an innovative public-private partnership to reward Canadians with loyalty points, exchangeable for retail goods, travel rewards, and groceries for engaging in healthy behaviors such as walking. Objective This study examined whether a multicomponent intervention including goal setting, graded tasks, biofeedback, and very small incentives tied to daily step goal achievement (assessed by built-in smartphone accelerometers) could increase physical activity in two Canadian provinces, British Columbia (BC) and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). Methods This 12-week, quasi-experimental (single group pre-post) study included 78,882 participants; 44.39% (35,014/78,882) enrolled in the Carrot Rewards “Steps” walking program during the recruitment period (June 13–July 10, 2016). During the 2-week baseline (or “run-in”) period, we calculated participants’ mean steps per day. Thereafter, participants earned incentives in the form of loyalty points (worth Can $0.04 ) every day they reached their personalized daily step goal (ie, baseline mean+1000 steps=first daily step goal level). Participants earned additional points (Can $0.40) for meeting their step goal 10+ nonconsecutive times in a 14-day period (called a “Step Up Challenge”). Participants could earn up to Can $5.00 during the 12-week evaluation period. Upon meeting the 10-day contingency, participants could increase their daily goal by 500 steps, aiming to gradually increase the daily step number by 3000. Only participants with ≥5 valid days (days with step counts: 1000-40,000) during the baseline period were included in the analysis (n=32,229).The primary study outcome was mean steps per day (by week), analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results The mean age of 32,229 participants with valid baseline data was 33.7 (SD 11.6) years; 66.11% (21,306/32,229) were female. The mean daily step count at baseline was 6511.22. Over half of users (16,336/32,229, 50.69%) were categorized as “physically inactive,” accumulating <5000 daily steps at baseline. Results from mixed-effects models revealed statistically significant increases in mean daily step counts when comparing baseline with each study week (P<.001). Compared with baseline, participants walked 115.70 more steps (95% CI 74.59 to 156.81; P<.001) at study week 12. BC and NL users classified as “high engagers” (app engagement above sample median; 15,511/32,229, 48.13%) walked 738.70 (95% CI 673.81 to 803.54; P<.001) and 346.00 (95% CI 239.26 to 452.74; P<.001) more steps, respectively. Physically inactive, high engagers (7022/32,229, 21.08%) averaged an increase of 1224.66 steps per day (95% CI 1160.69 to 1288.63; P<.001). Effect sizes were modest. Conclusions Providing very small but immediate rewards for personalized daily step goal achievement as part of a multicomponent intervention increased daily step counts on a population scale, especially for physically inactive individuals and individuals who engaged more with the walking program. Positive effects in both BC and NL provide evidence of replicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erica Lau
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tricia Leahey
- University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Marc A Adams
- Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Guy Faulkner
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Araújo-Soares V, Hankonen N, Presseau J, Rodrigues A, Sniehotta FF. Developing Behavior Change Interventions for Self-Management in Chronic Illness: An Integrative Overview. EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST 2018; 24:7-25. [PMID: 31496632 PMCID: PMC6727632 DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2017] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
More people than ever are living longer with chronic conditions such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, and heart disease. Behavior change for effective self-management can improve health outcomes and quality of life in people living with such chronic illnesses. The science of developing behavior change interventions with impact for patients aims to optimize the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of interventions and rigorous evaluation of outcomes and processes of behavior change. The development of new services and technologies offers opportunities to enhance the scope of delivery of interventions to support behavior change and self-management at scale. Herein, we review key contemporary approaches to intervention development, provide a critical overview, and integrate these approaches into a pragmatic, user-friendly framework to rigorously guide decision-making in behavior change intervention development. Moreover, we highlight novel emerging methods for rapid and agile intervention development. On-going progress in the science of intervention development is needed to remain in step with such new developments and to continue to leverage behavioral science's capacity to contribute to optimizing interventions, modify behavior, and facilitate self-management in individuals living with chronic illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Araújo-Soares
- Institute of Health & Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,School of Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nelli Hankonen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - Justin Presseau
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.,School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | - Angela Rodrigues
- Institute of Health & Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Fuse. The UK Clinical Research Collaboration Centre for Translational Research in Public Health
| | - Falko F Sniehotta
- Institute of Health & Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Fuse. The UK Clinical Research Collaboration Centre for Translational Research in Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Corepal R, Tully MA, Kee F, Miller SJ, Hunter RF. Behavioural incentive interventions for health behaviour change in young people (5-18 years old): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2018; 110:55-66. [PMID: 29432789 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Revised: 02/01/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Physical inactivity, an unhealthy diet, smoking, and alcohol consumption are key determinants of morbidity and mortality. These health behaviours often begin at a young age and track into adulthood, emphasising a need for interventions in children and young people. Previous research has demonstrated the potential effectiveness of behavioural incentive (BI) interventions in adults. However, little is known about their effectiveness in children and adolescents. Eight bibliographic databases were searched. Eligibility criteria included controlled trials using behavioural incentives (rewards provided contingent on successful performance of the target behaviour) as an intervention component for health behaviour change in children and adolescents. Intervention effects (standardised mean differences or odds ratios) were calculated and pooled by health behaviour, using a random effects model. Twenty-two studies were included (of n = 8392 identified), 19 of which were eligible for meta-analysis: physical activity (n = 8); healthier eating (n = 3); and smoking (n = 8). There was strong evidence that behavioural incentives may encourage healthier eating behaviours, some evidence that behavioural incentives were effective for encouraging physical activity behaviour, and limited evidence to support the use of behavioural incentives for smoking cessation and prevention in adolescents. Findings suggest that behavioural incentives may encourage uptake and initiation of healthy eating and physical activity in young people. However, this is a limited evidence base and a wide range of incentive designs have yet to be explored. Future research should further investigate the acceptability of these intervention approaches for young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rekesh Corepal
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK; UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
| | - Mark A Tully
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK; UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Frank Kee
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK; UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Sarah J Miller
- UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK; School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Ruth F Hunter
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK; UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Burns RJ, Rothman AJ. Comparing Types of Financial Incentives to Promote Walking: An Experimental Test. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 2018; 10:193-214. [DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|