A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Combined use of the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework with other implementation frameworks: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Appropriately and comprehensive applying implementation frameworks is one of the key challenges in implementation science resulting in increased use of multiple implementation frameworks within projects. This is particularly true for frameworks such as PARIHS/i-PARIHS. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to examine if and why the PARIHS/i-PARIHS framework has been applied in research with other implementation frameworks.

METHODS

We searched six databases from 2016 (the year following i-PARIHS' publication) to April 2024 and supplemented this with a citation search of the seminal i-PARIHS paper. We included studies that 1) were peer-reviewed with a protocol or empirical study design, 2) have applied the PARIHS or i-PARIHS framework for implementation planning, delivery, analysis, or evaluation and 3) also used at least one other implementation framework. Descriptive statistics were conducted to report on study characteristics and frequency for each implementation framework used with PARIHS/i-PARIHS. A qualitative, content analysis was used to analyse the answers to open-ended extraction questions.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles met criteria for inclusion and included 16 protocols and 20 empirical articles (twelve intervention and eight cross-sectional studies). Thirty-four of the studies used one additional implementation framework and two studies used two additional implementation frameworks. In total, nine implementation frameworks were applied with PARIHS/i-PARIHS, including: 1) RE-AIM, 2) CFIR, 3) NPT, 4) REP, 5) TDF, 6), DSF, 7) KTA, 8) Stetler's Model, and 9) SIF. Thirty-four reported a rationale for using PARIHS/i-PARIHS and 34 reported a rationale for using the other implementation framework. Only eleven reported a rationale for using more than one implementation framework. Only three reported strengths of combining implementation frameworks.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this review identified that implementation researchers are using PARIHS/i-PARIHS in combination with other implementation frameworks and providing little to no rationale for why. Use of multiple implementation frameworks without detailed rationales compromises our ability to evaluate mechanisms of effectiveness. Implementation researchers and practitioners need to be more explicit about their framework selection, detailing the complementary strengths of the frameworks that are being used in combination, including why using one is not sufficient.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO: ID: 392147.

How to maintain recovery following low-intensity interventions for anxiety and/or depression? A qualitative exploration through perspectives of professionals and stakeholders

BACKGROUND

Globally, 301 million people have anxiety disorders and 280 million have depression. Talking therapies are the preferred option against pharmacological treatment for these populations. In the UK, over half of those who received low-intensity evidence-based talking therapy for anxiety and/or depression relapsed within a year. This study explored practitioners and stakeholders' perspectives on current practices routinely use to maintain recovery over time and identified opportunities to improve long-term treatment effectiveness in NHS Talking Therapies services.

METHODS

This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Twenty-five participants were interviewed remotely. Data were analysed deductively using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and inductively to allow emerging codes that did not map into the framework.

RESULTS

Of the 36 CFIR domains, 27 were evidenced in the data, and 17 new constructs were developed. Data emphasised the absence of standardised approaches in addressing relapse prevention, limitations on available resources, the need for further training, the importance of defining recovery beyond clinical symptoms, and recommendations were identified to support recovery over time.

LIMITATIONS

The sample comprised primarily White British females, reflecting the current workforce. Those interested in participating may have resulted in social desirability biases. Furthermore, focussing on professional perspectives may not represent service user experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

All participants agreed on the importance of interventions targeting recovery over time and emphasised the need for effective training and resources to support professionals and patients in sustaining treatment gains over time. Cost-effective interventions targeting long-term recovery could prove fruitful to improve current provision.

Systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of non-pneumatic antishock garments in low- and middle-income countries: lessons for global health

BACKGROUND

Obstetric haemorrhage is a leading global cause of maternal mortality, particularly in rural and resource-poor settings where delays in care are common. Non-pneumatic antishock garments (NASGs) have been proposed as a temporising measure to reduce blood loss and improve survival rates. Despite positive outcomes from clinical trials, the uptake of the NASG has been slow and faced various implementation challenges. This review thus aims to identify and analyse the barriers and facilitators of NASG implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was developed to search for studies related to NASG use in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from inception up to August 2024. Grey literature was also reviewed. Two independent reviewers screened identified records using Covidence, assessing relevant studies for inclusion. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach structured around the CFIR's five domains.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were reviewed. Common barriers included high initial procurement costs. Inadequate training and knowledge among healthcare providers were another obstacle, resulting in low confidence in the proper use of NASG. Logistical issues, such as inconsistent supply chains and difficulties in maintaining NASG devices, were highlighted, alongside the challenges posed by under-resourced health infrastructures. Facilitators included effective training programmes, support from health authorities, advocacy by local and national champions, and successful integration into clinical protocols and health systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation experience of NASG in LMICs highlights important lessons for stakeholders in the global health space, with challenges such as high initial costs and inadequate training being common obstacles in LMICs. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators (eg, through comprehensive training, garnering local and international support and active sourcing for locally produced materials to reduce costs) across multilevel contexts influence implementation.

Evaluating the implementation of inclisiran in primary care: process evaluation interim findings from interviews with key stakeholders

OBJECTIVES

VICTORION-Spirit was a hybrid study designed to assess the feasibility of implementing inclisiran, a novel cholesterol-lowering treatment and behavioural support within primary care centres in England. This process evaluation aimed to evaluate the implementation of inclisiran for patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or ASCVD-risk equivalents (n=900), from the perspectives of key stakeholders.

DESIGN

VICTORION-Spirit was a phase IIIb, multicentre, randomised, controlled study. We followed a process evaluation strategy to collate the views of stakeholders via semistructured interviews and to gain insights on the 'implementability' of inclisiran in primary care. Data were generated via interviews with patients, healthcare providers and research nurses and analysed using a qualitative rapid analysis approach.

SETTING

Primary care in Greater Manchester, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

84 participants were interviewed, including patients (n=56), professionals at participating practices in VICTORION-Spirit (n=13), health advisors (n=4) and research nurses (n=11).

RESULTS

Interim findings suggest the process of receiving and providing inclisiran during the study was 'straightforward', and the behavioural support provided to some patients was generally viewed favourably. Beyond the trial, patients and healthcare providers thought the delivery of inclisiran could work well as a practice nurse-provided service. Barriers to implementing inclisiran were generally related to workforce and workload pressures in primary care, and an incentive structure to support delivery was recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and healthcare providers supported implementing inclisiran in primary care. It was convenient for patients to receive inclisiran in general practice, and most providers felt that the intervention was a useful addition to existing lipid-lowering treatments. Several barriers to implementation were highlighted, including concerns relating to general practice resources and costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04807400.

Identifying Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Sexual and Relationship Health Intervention within the Child Welfare System: A Mixed Methods Study

Access to sexual health education is critical for the wellbeing of youth in out-of-home care. HEART (Health Education and Relationship Training) is an online, evidence-based sexual health program that may benefit this group of youth, but reaching youth in the child welfare system remains challenging. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing HEART within the child welfare system. We used a convergent parallel mixed methods design and applied the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide data collection and analysis. We collected 1) qualitative data through semi-structured interviews with foster caregivers and child welfare professionals (n = 14) in one state in the United States; and 2) data through an online survey among youth in care (n = 72) across several states. Participants identified barriers and facilitators at four CFIR domains. Barriers included the religious and conservative beliefs of foster families and staff; the sensitive nature of discussing sex among youth who have experienced trauma; youth pushback to authority; and a lack of structure for offering youth sexual health education. Results provide a foundation for developing implementation strategies to implement HEART within the child welfare system.

Implementing motivational interviewing to improve endocrine therapy adherence among breast cancer patients: a qualitative process evaluation of the getset pilot intervention

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the implementation of the GETSET (Guiding Endocrine Therapy Success through Empowerment and Teamwork) pilot, a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention aimed at improving endocrine therapy (ET) adherence among patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), qualitative interviews were conducted with site staff (N = 2), patients (N = 4), and counselors (N = 2).

RESULTS

The thematic analysis identified facilitators such as high-quality materials, ease of scheduling sessions, and effective communication among staff. However, barriers included lack of personalization and systemic issues like understaffing.

CONCLUSIONS

The study underscores the need to adapt implementation of behavioral interventions in a healthcare setting to improve ET adherence. As this was a process evaluation of a pilot study, future work should evaluate the barriers and facilitators to a larger clinical trial to identify if the same strategies should be refined.

Understanding the implementation process of the Adult Day Services Plus program

BACKGROUND

Among the available evidence-based interventions targeting dementia family caregivers, there is limited evidence on implementation processes that produce desired outcomes (i.e., reductions in depression and burden) for caregivers, people living with dementia (PLWD), and community-based programs themselves. In a national multi-site hybrid effectiveness trial, we investigated the implementation success and challenges of embedding an evidence-based intervention (ADS Plus) targeting dementia family caregivers whose PLWD was enrolled in an adult day service (ADS).

METHODS

Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted a directed qualitative content analysis to understand caregiver (n = 15) and staff (n = 14) perceptions of facilitators of and potential barriers to implementation of ADS Plus in nine ADS programs to guide future dissemination efforts.

RESULTS

Results demonstrated that successful delivery of ADS Plus was achieved through intervention adaptability, personalization, and structure (innovation); responsiveness of ADS Plus to external changes and intervention marketability (outer domain); presence of aligned goals and familiarity (inner setting); involvement of research staff, connections among practitioners, and meeting caregiver needs (individual domain); and understanding caregivers' needs and addressing staff capacity to take action (implementation process). This adaptability reassures us of the potential to implement ADS Plus in heterogeneous programmatic settings.

CONCLUSION

Globally, our results demonstrate that ADS Plus offers a viable community-based solution for supporting dementia family caregivers with high implementation potential for diverse ADS settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02927821 (Registration Date 10/7/2016).

Developing and piloting a peer quality improvement coaching protocol for front-line healthcare staff

BACKGROUND

Improving the quality of patient care remains a global necessity. Despite system and professional benefits, current evidence indicates that the spread of improvement principles among front-line healthcare workers remains poor.While education and training alone are unlikely to result in consistent improvement practice, coaching can play a critical role in sustainable, evidence-based improvement implementation. Peer quality improvement coaching (PQIC) places the power and agency in the shared relationship between coach and coachee to shape coachee quality improvement (QI) outcomes.Study objective was to develop and pilot an evidence-based protocol for implementation and evaluation of a PQIC for front-line staff engaged in small to intermediate improvement efforts.

METHODS

We conducted a multistage case-study design and implementation process. First, a systematised literature review identified themes about the theory and practice of QI coaching (QIC). Second, these themes guided the development of a PQIC protocol. Finally, the protocol was piloted and evaluated among staff in a single-centre tertiary maternity hospital. PQIC effectiveness was assessed using evaluation tools identified in the literature.

RESULTS

Effectiveness; strategies and models; moderating factors and methods for evaluation of QIC emerged from the literature. Together with Bloom's taxonomy and Kirkpatrick's educational model, these themes informed the development of this PQIC protocol. It was piloted in three steps: education, coaching and evaluation. A survey revealed that the participants in the education step achieved excellent scores. Following the coaching journey, the coached multidisciplinary team leaders completed their improvement initiatives and demonstrated increased QI knowledge and skills measured by the 'IHI improvement advisor self-assessment tool' and 'IHI assessment scale for collaboratives'.

CONCLUSION

Built on established education, peer coaching and QI concepts, this evidence-based PQIC protocol adds to international evidence on how to support front-line healthcare workers in their improvement efforts. Future research needs to assess protocol effectiveness across different settings.

Investigating the implementation of infection prevention and control practices in neonatal care across country income levels: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite the proven effectiveness of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in reducing healthcare-associated infections and related costs, their implementation poses a challenge in neonatal care settings across high-income (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While existing research has predominantly focused on assessing the clinical effectiveness of these practices in neonatal care, aspects concerning their implementation remain underexplored. This systematic review therefore aimed to analyze implementation determinants and employed strategies for implementing IPC practices in inpatient neonatal care across country income levels.

METHODS

Following a targeted search in seven databases, titles and abstracts as well as full texts were screened in a dual review process to identify studies focusing on the implementation of IPC practices in inpatient neonatal care and reporting on implementation determinants and/or implementation strategies. Implementation determinants were synthesized using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation strategies were coded according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy. A convergent integrated approach was used to narratively summarize results across qualitative and quantitative studies. χ2 Tests and Fisher's Exact Tests were performed to analyze differences in implementation determinants and strategies across IPC practices and country income levels. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Out of 6,426 records, a total of 156 studies were included in the systematic review. Neonatal units in LMICs and HICs showed general commonalities in reported implementation determinants, which were mainly reported at the organizational level. While educational as well as evaluative and iterative strategies were most frequently employed to support the implementation of IPC practices in both LMICs and HICs, other strategies employed showed variance across country income levels. Notably, the statistical analyses identified a significant association between country income levels and implementation determinants and strategies respectively ([Formula: see text]<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review underscore the importance of the organizational level for the implementation of IPC practices in neonatal care irrespective of country income level. However, further research is needed to understand the underlying relationships of factors and dynamics contributing to the observed practice variances in LMICs and HICs.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022380379).

Barriers and facilitators to the application of nurse practitioners' training pilot programs in China: A CFIR-guided descriptive qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The Guidelines on Prescriptive Authority for Nurses released by the International Council of Nurses indicate that 44 countries or territories worldwide have enacted legislation granting prescriptive authority to nurses. In the US, 27 states, two territories, and Washington, D.C. have authorized certified nurse practitioners full practice authority, including prescriptive authority, and momentum is building. Currently, in mainland China, there is no national legal mandate for nurse practitioners to prescribe, although a few institutions have initiated pilot training programs for nurse practitioners. However, little is known about the factors influencing their prescribing. Research on the value of such pilot programs from the perspectives of nurse practitioners and stakeholders is required. Aim The purpose of this study is to identify, assess and synthesize the perceptions of nurse practitioners and stakeholders in two pilot training programs on the barriers and facilitators to the potential development and implementation of nurse prescribing in mainland China.

DESIGN

A descriptive qualitative research design.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at two nurse practitioner pilot institutions in mainland China.

PARTICIPANTS

Five nurse practitioners, three collaborators, three policymakers and three trainers of nurse practitioners from two pilot institutions.

METHODS

Data were collected via semi-structured interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as a framework to orient the data analysis.

RESULTS

Within the five Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains, we identified 31 barriers and 50 facilitators influencing the potential implementation of nurse practitioner prescribing. Barriers mainly included insufficient urgency for change, lack of policy and legal support, inadequate education and training on prescribing, and low public awareness. Facilitators encompassed nurses' practical prescribing experience, their competence and confidence in role expansion, effective teamwork, and a strong demand orientation within healthcare settings.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that China possesses significant potential to successfully carry out nurse practitioner prescribing initiatives. It is crucial to explore factors hindering or promoting the development of nurse practitioners to effectively support their implementation within healthcare systems while strategizing for future advancements in this area. In the case that the national policy has not yet been promulgated, the outcomes derived from our pilot work will carry substantial influence over national policies.

Identifying Barriers to Implementing Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies in Rhode Island Health Care Systems: A Qualitative Approach

Introduction: Complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies are widely used and make up billions of dollars in out-of-pocket expenditures. This quality improvement project aimed to identify stakeholders' perceptions of implementing CIH therapies in health care systems to examine the barriers and facilitators to CIH implementation in Rhode Island (RI). Methods: A qualitative approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to conduct interviews with key stakeholder groups: health care administrators, health insurance administrators, physicians, and CIH practitioners. Interviews were analyzed by directed content analysis of transcripts with CFIR as the a priori coding framework. Results: Eleven subconstructs within four major domains were most prominent in interviews across all stakeholder groups. Key barriers in the "innovation" domain include a perceived lack of evidence and credibility of CIH therapies, logistical and administrative complexity of implementation, high costs to patients, and little financial incentive for hospitals and insurance companies. The "outer setting" domain highlights the utility of market pressure in decision making to implement CIH and the role of health policy. The "inner setting" domain demonstrates the varied personal beliefs about CIH, credentialing challenges, and the dissonance between medical system priorities and patient needs. Positive facilitation of implementation is marked by personal exposure to CIH and provider satisfaction in the "implementation process" domain. Conclusion: CIH therapies offer the medical system low risk and effective interventions that meet patient needs not currently met by Western medicine. However, implementation is difficult due to poor perception of evidence and lack of financial gain for the medical system. Acupuncture and massage may be modalities better situated for implementation in the RI medical system. Further education, awareness, and advocacy for CIH therapies would help meet patients' needs for CIH availability.

Implementation of risk mitigation prescribing during dual public health emergencies: A qualitative study among Indigenous people who use drugs and health planners in Northern British Columbia, Canada

BACKGROUND

In response to the dual public health emergencies of COVID-19 and the overdose crisis, the Government of British Columbia (BC) introduced risk mitigation prescribing, or prescribed safer supply. In the context of colonialism and racism, Indigenous people are disproportionately impacted by substance use harms and experience significant barriers to receiving care, particularly those living in rural and remote communities. As part of a larger provincial evaluation, we sought to assess the implementation of risk mitigation prescribing as experienced by Indigenous people who use drugs (IPWUD) in Northern BC.

METHODS

We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the First Nations Perspective on Health and Wellness as conceptual frameworks to guide the study. In partnership with people with lived/living experience, we conducted 20 qualitative interviews with IPWUD. Data were supplemented by four interviews with health planners and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Participants reported limited implementation of risk mitigation prescribing in Northern BC, with unique regional challenges and innovative facilitators to access. Analysis of supplementary health planner data was consistent with the experiences of IPWUD and together provided a comprehensive picture of implementation in Northern BC. Four themes emerged: 1) Northern socio-politico-cultural barriers to implementation (outer setting), 2) rural and remote healthcare delivery challenges (inner setting), 3) adaptability of risk mitigation prescribing on Northern wellness (intervention characteristics), and 4) Northern ingenuity, relationality and champions facilitating access (implementation process).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation and access to risk mitigation prescribing in Northern BC was limited, with region-specific applicability challenges and a health service delivery model that was not able to sufficiently meet the unique service needs of IPWUD. Demonstrating Northern ingenuity, peer groups, harm reduction community champions, and telehealth services were identified as stopgap measures that promoted access and reduced inequitable implementation within the region.

Implementation of the STEPPS program for the treatment of self-harm behaviors in Catalonia's prisons: barriers and facilitators

BACKGROUND

The Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is an evidence-based program that has been shown to be effective in reducing self-harm behaviors in Correctional Settings (CS). However, there is limited understanding of the contextual factors that impact the implementation of this intervention within such complex environments. A comprehensive understanding of the implementation process is crucial for the successful adoption of this program. This study aims to examine the factors that influence the implementation of the STEPPS program in CS, specifically regarding the management of self-harm behaviors.

METHOD

A hybrid implementation effectiveness type III study was conducted in penitentiary centers in Catalonia (Spain). Eight Focus Group Discussions based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were conducted with 17 professionals who implemented the STEPPS program. Additionally, quantitative data were gathered using an open-closed questionnaire based on a CFIR questionnaire.

RESULTS

The results indicated that the scientific evidence and knowledge acquired during the implementation process were seen as facilitators. Also, meetings and support from the external research team were considered positive factors. Conversely, implementation barriers of the STEPPS program in CS included the complexity of the intervention format and the mobility of inmates between modules and centers during the duration of the program.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings represent the first attempt to address self-harm behaviors within CS while considering the implementation process. They provide valuable insight into adapting evidence-based interventions, such as STEPPS, for implementation in CS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06297460 (ClinicalTrials.gov, retrospectively registered).

A mixed-methods observational study of strategies for success in implementation science: overcoming emergency departments hurdles

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is a major public health concern, affecting 6.7 million Americans. An estimated 16% of emergency department (ED) patients with acute heart failure (AHF) are discharged home. Our Get with the Guidelines in Emergency Department Patients with Heart Failure (GUIDED-HF) toolkit aims to improve AHF self-care and facilitate safer transitions in care for these patients. We describe implementation barriers and facilitators, and the selection and refinement of implementation strategies, to facilitate future GUIDED-HF implementation.

METHODS

A mixed-methods cross-sectional observational study was conducted in four United States EDs in two diverse healthcare systems in the Pacific West and Midwest. Data were collected using a survey and interviews with ED providers, nurses, and leaders. The survey assessed the ED context using the context scale of the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research informed interviews. Quantitative data were summarized using medians (interquartile ranges) or percentages (frequencies). Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess differences in the healthcare system and profession. Qualitative data were analyzed and summarized using rapid qualitative analysis. Convergence of quantitative and qualitative data was used to inform specific refining of implementation strategies to the local context (e.g., who should serve as champions, how best practice alerts should be implemented).

RESULTS

Participants were predominately white (76%) with median (IQR) age 37.0 (32.0, 41.0). ED leaders/administrators, providers, and nurses comprised 15%, 55%, and 29% of participants, respectively. Sites reported an ORCA context scale score of 3.7 [3.4, 4.0] (scale of 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Comparison of scores by profession showed a significant difference in the context score among providers (3.9 [3.5, 4.0]), leaders (3.7 [3.5, 4.0]), and nurses (3.6 [3.0, 3.9]) (p = 0.048). Qualitative data indicated implementation barriers (e.g., resource limitations, patient health literacy), facilitators (e.g., GUIDED-HF is patient-centric; site and intervention congruent values, norms, and goals), and site-specific needs due to contextual factors (e.g., education needs, feedback mechanisms, champions).

CONCLUSIONS

Specific determinants of implementation exist in ED settings and require the refining of implementation strategies to overcome site-specific barriers and enhance facilitators.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

n/a.

Could physical activity promote indicators of physical and psychological health among children and adolescents? An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

We performed an umbrella review to synthesize evidence on the effects of physical activity (PA) interventions on indicators of physical and psychological health among children and adolescents, including body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), depressive symptoms, and cognitive function.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception through 31 July 2023. We included meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials exploring the effects of PA interventions on BMI, BP, depressive symptoms, or cognitive function in healthy or general children and adolescents. Standard Mean Difference (SMD) was calculated for continuous outcome indicators, while Relative Risk (RR) was calculated for categorical outcome indicators.

RESULTS

A total of 21 meta-analyses were included. The evidence for the effects of PA interventions on reducing BMI [n = 68,368, SMD = - 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = - 0.07 to - 0.01, P = 0.012, I2 = 46.6%], relieving diastolic BP (n = 8204, SMD = - 1.16, 95% CI = - 2.12 to - 0.20, P = 0.018, I2 = 83.1%), preventing depressive symptoms (n = 5146, SMD = - 0.21, 95% CI = - 0.31 to - 0.12, P < 0.001, I2 = 29.0%), and promoting cognitive function (n = 19,955, SMD = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.27-0.54, P < 0.001, I2 = 88.0%) was all weak but significant (class IV evidence). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that school-based and after-school PA interventions, curricular PA interventions, and PA interventions emphasizing enjoyment were more effective in reducing BMI, while curricular PA and sports programs achieved greater executive function.

CONCLUSION

PA interventions could weakly reduce BMI, relieve BP, prevent depressive symptoms, and promote cognitive function in general children and adolescents. Targeted interventions on PA should be a priority to promote physical and psychological health for children and adolescents, especially the curricular PA emphasizing enjoyment in the school settings.

Do community-based digital health inclusion programmes contribute to tackling health inequalities in disadvantaged population groups?: a qualitative study of experiences of a city-wide programme in the North of England

BACKGROUND

Advances in digital healthcare and health information provide benefits to the public. However, lack of digital skills together with access, confidence, trust and motivation issues present seemingly insurmountable barriers for many. Such digital health exclusion exacerbates existing health inequalities experienced by older people, people with less income, less education or who don't have English as a first language. This study examines the role of a city-wide digital inclusion programme in the North of England, which works with Voluntary Sector Community Organisations (VCSOs) to provide digital support to disadvantaged communities (Digital Health Hubs). The aim was to explore if and how Digital Health Hubs contribute to tackling health inequalities, with a specific focus on impacts on service-users and how these impacts are produced.

METHODS

We used qualitative semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of service-users receiving digital support, and perspectives of staff working for organisations coordinating or providing digital support (n = 30).

RESULTS

Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify four major themes and mapped to 'Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research' constructs. These were: programme components, recipient-centred support, impacts on service-users and system-level barriers to digital health services. Findings suggest moderators of implementation are provision of community spaces, social activities and devices and Wi-fi, and recipient-centred support through community understanding, personalised regular support and trusting relationships. Impacts on service-users include improved social and emotional resilience and basic digital skills. Health system-level barriers to digital health services, such as inconsistency in service provision, were also identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Themes highlight the importance of recipient-centred support by Voluntary and Community Sector Organisations (VCSOs) which centres the unique needs of specific communities. Our data provide policymakers with a model for implementation that could be replicated and scaled-up. Our data add to the public health, primary care and digital health research by proposing an initial programme theory for how Digital Health Hubs may reduce health inequalities, and recommendations for evaluation which consider short-, medium- and long-term outcomes, and contextual factors which are likely to be crucial to Digital Health Hubs' effectiveness.

Surveying the Literature on Implementation Determinants and Strategies for HIV Structural Interventions: A Systematic Review Protocol

Background

Despite improvements in HIV prevention, treatment, and surveillance, vast disparities remain in access, uptake, and adherence of evidence-based interventions. These disparities are most pronounced among racially, sexually, and gender minoritized populations, as well as among those living in poverty and/or who use injectable drugs. Structural interventions, or interventions that target social and structural determinants of health like housing, transportation, or income, are needed to increase access to, use of, and adherence to HIV EBIs to advance the aims of the national Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative. However, it is unclear to what extent barriers and facilitators of structural interventions have been identified in the U.S. and what implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions have been developed to enhance their delivery.

Methods

To identify what implementation determinants, implementation strategies, and adjunctive interventions have been identified for HIV structural interventions, we carried out a broad database search between May and July 2024, identifying a total of 8,098 articles. We will use a multi-step process to identify articles to include in the systematic review. We will use natural language processing to identify articles for exclusion, followed by manual text review and extraction using COVIDENCE software. Literature on determinants will be coded according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions will be coded according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change, the Theoretical Domains Framework, and COM-B. We will descriptively analyze determinants, implementation strategies, and adjunctive interventions, use natural language processing for thematic analysis of determinants, implementation strategies, and adjunctive interventions, and provide narrative description of implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions.

Discussion

This systematic review will identify key barriers and facilitators for HIV structural intervention implementation strategies, including multi-level approaches to address disparities among marginalized populations. Findings will provide insights for advancing equitable, scalable interventions to support the goals of the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.

Systematic review registration

CRD42024554315.

Implementation Outcomes From a Pilot Study of Mindful Awareness in Body-Oriented Therapy (MABT) as a Chronic Pain Treatment Modality in an Integrative Health Clinic

Background

As regulation of opioid prescribing evolves, primary care and pain clinics are shifting to provide non-pharmacological and interdisciplinary chronic pain care. An under-utilized but growing area of health care for chronic pain is complementary and integrative health (CIH). However, there is limited availability of CIH approaches within the health care system. Mindful Awareness in Body-Oriented Therapy (MABT) is an evidence-based mind-body therapy, with a manualized protocol, that focuses on developing interoceptive sensibility for improved self-awareness and nervous system regulation. Prior MABT research shows MABT improves self-report and physiological indicators of interoception as well as mental and physical symptoms of distress.

Methods

This pilot single-group study used a hybrid implementation-effectiveness design and mixed methods to study implementation strategies and outcomes for bringing MABT into an integrative chronic pain clinic. Administrative data, staff surveys, and focus groups were used to understand the implementation process and outcomes (see Additional files 2, 3, and 4). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey and administrative data. A content analysis approach was used to analyze qualitative data from focus groups.

Results

7 staff surveys were administered over the 24-month study period and showed high acceptability and appropriateness that increased over time. Adoption, feasibility, and sustainability were also high. Clinicians made 70 referrals to MABT, 56 patients scheduled a session, 41 patients completed at least one session, and 71% of these completed the protocol. Focus groups identified MABT as a therapy that filled a gap in services, particularly for patients with a lack of body awareness and high emotion dysregulation.

Conclusion

Implementation of MABT was highly successful in an integrative health clinic focused on chronic pain treatment.

ClinicalTrialsgov registration

NCT05289024 Registered March 11, 2022 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05289024?term=NCT05289024&rank=1.

It takes a village: Feedback from personnel in addiction treatment programs indicates support for changing the intake process

INTRODUCTION

The initial intake encounter represents a critical point for treatment engagement in outpatient addiction treatment programs. Despite the intake assessment being more comprehensive, personalized, and capable of matching clients to level of treatment, addiction treatment programs continue to have among the highest attrition rates. Thus, it may not be what, but how services are delivered that contributes to attrition. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) offers a comprehensive framework to attend to sources of needed innovation for the intake process. The current study used a mixed method design, guided by CFIR, to obtain feedback from personnel in addiction treatment programs on the current intake process, as well as the facilitators and barriers to changing the intake process.

METHODS

Personnel within New Mexico-based addiction treatment programs completed measures of individual and organizational readiness to make changes within their programs (N = 79; 76 % women, 79 % White, 55 % Latino/a). From this sample, 38 participants completed a CFIR-based semi-structured interview to identify potential barriers and facilitators to changing the intake process.

RESULTS

Participants reported moderate-to-high scores on readiness and capability to make organizational changes. For qualitative data, we identified nine broad themes, grouped based on (1) perspectives of current intake process (Intake Process, Organization Culture, Change Perspectives, Internal Communication, Client Needs) and (2) perspectives of changing the intake to an MI session (MI knowledge/attitudes, MI at intake, MI in organization, MI fit with Client Needs).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight that there are specific components of the intake content and process that appear to disengage clients, specific policies and procedures that appear to overburden staff, and key stakeholders and resources needed to improve the intake process. Recommendations are provided for intake-specific and procedural-level changes both in the organization and with outside agencies to improve the intake process.

Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify challenges and opportunities for implementing a reproductive health education program into sickle cell disease care

BACKGROUND

As survival rates for individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) increase, calls have been made to improve their reproductive healthcare and outcomes. The research team created a web-based program entitled Fertility edUcaTion to Understand ReproductivE health in Sickle cell disease (FUTURES). The study aim was to use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) during pre-implementation to identify challenges and opportunities from the individual to systems level of implementation to ultimately optimize the integration of FUTURES into clinical practice.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians, research team members, and adolescent and young adult (AYA) males with SCD and their caregivers who participated in pilot testing. Interviews (N = 31) were coded inductively and then mapped onto CFIR domains (i.e., outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and intervention characteristics).

RESULTS

Research team interviews indicated the lack of universal guidelines for reproductive care in this population and gaps in reproductive health knowledge as key reasons for developing FUTURES, also highlighting the importance of collaboration with community members during development. Clinicians reported intraorganizational communication as essential to implementing FUTURES and discussed challenges in addressing reproductive health due to competing priorities. Clinicians, AYAs, and caregivers reported positive views of FUTURES regarding length, engagement, accessibility, and content. Suggestions for the best setting and timing for implementation varied.

CONCLUSIONS

Using CFIR during the pre-implementation phase highlighted challenges and opportunities regarding integrating this program into SCD care. These findings will inform adaptation and further testing of FUTURES to ensure effective implementation of this novel education program.

Implementation of the virtual transitional care stroke intervention for older adults with stroke and multimorbidity: A qualitative descriptive study

Background

Older adults with stroke and multimorbidity experience frequent care transitions, which are often poorly coordinated and fragmented. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the implementation and effectiveness of the Transitional Care Stroke Intervention (TCSI), a 6-month, multi-component, evidence-informed intervention to support older adults with stroke and multimorbidity using outpatient stroke rehabilitation services. The TCSI was designed to support self-management, improve health outcomes, and enhance the quality and experience of care transitions.

Objective

To explore the facilitators and challenges to implementing the TCSI, from the perspective of healthcare providers (HCPs) (n = 12) and Managers (n = 3).

Methods

Data collection and analysis were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Data were collected from study documents, individual and group interviews conducted with HCPs and a Care Coordinator, and surveys from managers. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

Intervention implementation was facilitated by: a) strong collaborative and interdependent HCP team relationships, b) dedicated resources (funding, staffing) to support intervention delivery, c) training and ongoing support, customized to individual HCP needs, d) organizational readiness, strong leadership, and effective champions, e) structures to facilitate virtual information-sharing, and f) regular monitoring of intervention implementation. Implementation challenges included: a) COVID-19 related challenges (staff turnover, community service disruptions), b) poor communication with community service providers, c) documentation burden (intervention-related), and d) virtual care delivery.

Conclusions

This research enhances understanding of the diversity of factors influencing implementation of the TCSI, and the conditions under which implementation is more likely to succeed.

Navigating virtual realities: identifying barriers and facilitators to implementing VR-enhanced PT for youth with chronic pain

OBJECTIVE

Virtual reality (VR) can enhance engagement in outpatient physical therapy (PT) through distraction and gamification of movement. This study assessed barriers and facilitators to VR-enhanced PT.

METHOD

Data were collected during a feasibility trial of VR-enhanced PT for youth with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Semistructured and informal interviews were conducted with youth participants, their caregivers, and collaborating physical therapists. To analyze transcriptions, content analysis was employed in multiple rounds. Barriers and facilitators to VR implementation were coded using a deductive approach, then an inductive approach was used to identify emergent themes within each deductive code category.

RESULTS

We completed interviews with youth participants (n = 9), caregivers (n = 7), and clinician stakeholders (n = 5). Coded barriers included: (1) participant identity and self-narrative inconsistent with the intervention, (2) system-level, structural constraints of healthcare, (3) lack of guidance and leadership from clinicians around VR use, (4) research burnout, (5) expectation violation and disappointment, and (6) missing the optimal treatment window. Coded facilitators included: (1) viewing VR as a bridge to achieving treatment goals, (2) having access to resources, (3) sustained positive experience and immersion in the game, (4) alignment between identity and the intervention, and (5) champion-level collaborations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance of considering the VR technology, person using the VR, and the context in which VR is being implemented to optimize uptake and acceptability. Adopting an implementation science lens to the field of VR for chronic pain will enhance the applicability and scale of impact.

Exploring the complexity of the implementation determinants of human papillomavirus vaccination in Africa through a systems thinking lens: A rapid review

A rapid review was conducted to explore the implementation determinants of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in the World Health Organization African Region and describe their dynamic relationship. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched in October 2023 to find relevant literature. A total of 64 published studies that reported factors affecting HPV vaccination were identified. Analysis of identified factors yielded 74 implementation determinants of HPV vaccination across the five domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): two (2.70%) were in the innovation domain, seven (9.46%) were in the outer setting domain, 14 (18.92%) were in the inner setting domain, 37 (50%) were in the individual domain and 14 (18.92%) were in the implementation process domain. A causal loop diagram of these implementation determinants revealed four balancing and seven reinforcing loops. Applying systems lens promoted a more holistic understanding of the implementation determinants of HPV vaccination, exposing leverage points for interventions.

Continued Implementation and Use of a Digital Informal Care Support Platform Before and After COVID-19: Multimethod Study

Background

With the growing need of support for informal caregivers (ICs) and care recipients (CRs) during COVID-19, the uptake of digital care collaboration platforms such as Caren increased. Caren is a platform designed to (1) improve communication and coordination between ICs and health care professionals, (2) provide a better overview of the care process, and (3) enhance safe information sharing within the care network. Insights on the impact of COVID-19 on the implementation and use of informal care platforms such as Caren are still lacking.

Objective

This study aimed to (1) identify technology developers' lessons learned from the continued implementation of Caren during COVID-19 and (2) examine pre-post COVID-19 changes in usage behavior and support functionality use of Caren.

Methods

A focus group with developers of the Caren platform (N=3) was conducted to extract implementation lessons learned. Focus group data were first analyzed deductively, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains (ie, individual characteristics, intervention characteristics, inner setting, and outer setting). Later, inductive analysis of overarching themes was performed. Furthermore, survey data were collected in 2019 (N=11,635) and 2022 (N=5573) among Caren platform users for comparing usage behavior and support functionality use. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results

Several lessons from the continued implementation of Caren during COVID-19 were identified. Those included, for example, alternative ways to engage with end users, incorporating automated user support and large-scale communication features, considering the fluctuation of user groups, and addressing data transparency concerns in health care. Quantitative results showed that the number of ICs and CRs who used Caren several times per day increased significantly (P<.001 for ICs and CRs) between 2019 (ICs: 23.8%; CRs: 23.2%) and 2022 (ICs: 35.2%; CRs: 37%), as well as the use of certain support functionalities such as a digital agenda to make and view appointments, a messaging function to receive updates and communicate with formal and informal caregivers, and digital notes to store important information.

Conclusions

Our study offers insights into the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the usage and implementation of the digital informal care support platform Caren. The study shows how platform developers maintained the implementation during COVID-19 and which support functionalities gained relevance among ICs and CRs throughout the pandemic. The findings can be used to improve the design and implementation of current and future digital platforms to support informal care toward the "new digital normal."

Strategies to foster stakeholder engagement in residency coaching: a CFIR-Informed qualitative study across diverse stakeholder groups

INTRODUCTION

Coaching interventions in graduate medical education have proven successful in increasing technical and communication skills, reducing errors, and improving patient care. Effective stakeholder engagement enhances the relevance, value, and long-term sustainability of interventions, yet specific strategies for stakeholder engagement remain uncertain. The purpose of this article is to identify strategies to foster engagement of diverse stakeholder groups in coaching interventions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted 35 semi-structured interviews between November 2021 and April 2022 with purposively sampled key stakeholders that captured participants' perspectives on physicians' communication training needs, roles, and involvement in, as well as contextual factors, facilitators, barriers, and improvement strategies of the multi-departmental Communication Coaching Program at our institution. We utilized the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research to guide data collection and analysis. An analytic approach relied on team-based thematic analysis with high inter-coder agreement between three raters (Cohen's kappa coefficient 0.83). Several validation techniques were used to enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the study.

RESULTS

Analysis of transcribed interviews with stakeholders directly involved in the Communication Coaching Program, including 10 residents, 10 faculty coaches, 9 medical education leaders, and 8 programmatic sponsors, revealed five key engagement strategies: (1) embrace collaborative design, (2) enable flexible adjustments and modifications, (3) secure funding, (4) identify champions, and (5) demonstrate outcomes. Additionally, a patient-centered approach to delivering the best possible patient care emerged as a primary objective that linked all stakeholder groups.

DISCUSSION

Evaluating the experiences of key stakeholders in the Communication Coaching Program helped identify targetable strategies to facilitate participant engagement across all organizational levels. The analysis also revealed universal alignment around the importance of providing high-quality patient care. Insights from this work provide guidance for clinical training programs moving toward the implementation of coaching interventions.

A Pilot Study on the Freelisting Method Among Adolescents with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Feasibility, Acceptability and Study Findings

Background/Objectives: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of freelisting for adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) and use freelisting to identify how adolescents with CMP cope with pain. Methods: This was a mixed-methods cross-sectional single-center study of patients 12-18 years old, diagnosed with CMP. Twenty-seven subjects participated in an interview which included the freelisting exercise, probing questions, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10-item, and semi-structured interview. Feasibility was pre-defined as ≥85% completion. A list of 'standardized' freelisting terms was created, and we calculated Smith's salience index. Freelisting terms were grouped into individual, family, friends, school, and medical domains. Results: In this predominantly female population, resilience levels were low to moderate, and on average, participants had moderate pain intensity and functional disability. The freelisting exercise was feasible and acceptable among females, with low recruitment of males. Salient words to describe adolescents' pain included frustrating, upsetting, annoying, and painful. Participants identified family, friends, teachers, guidance counselors, and health professionals as key sources of support. Many participants reported difficulties communicating their pain. Helpful coping strategies included rest, distraction, relaxation, endurance, and extracurricular participation. Conclusions: Freelisting was well perceived among female adolescents with CMP. Supportive relationships with community members play an important role for this population. However, perceived stigma may deter female adolescents from talking about their pain. Purposive sampling of male participants and recruitment strategies ensuring diverse patient representation are necessary to ensure generalizability of future results when using the freelisting method for adolescents with CMP.

Development of a Complex Intervention for Promoting Participation in Resistance Exercise Among Community-Dwelling Frail Older Adults in China: A Multimethod Qualitative Study

Background and Objectives

Regular resistance exercise (RE) showed a promising effect in reducing frailty in older adults. However, the participation of RE among this population remains low. This study was, therefore, aimed at developing a complex intervention tailored to community-dwelling frail older adults in China to promote participation in RE and reduce frailty ultimately.

Research Design and Methods

Using a multimethods qualitative study design, this study included 2 parts: (1) a qualitative study was performed to explore barriers and facilitators for participation in RE among frail older adults through stakeholder interviews. The interview was guided by the comprehensive framework of implementation research; (2) two rounds of expert consultation, guided by the social cognitive theory, were conducted to identify the key barriers and facilitators, and corresponding implementation strategies for promoting participation in RE. A complex intervention was developed accordingly.

Results

Interviews were conducted with 16 frail older adults (mean age = 72.9) and 10 community workers (mean working years = 11.2). A total of 10 barriers and 16 facilitators were identified; safety concerns, decline in physical function, and lack of knowledge were frequently mentioned barriers, while health needs, social support, and professional guidance were common facilitators. Then 10 experts (mean working years = 20.9) were consulted to determine the main barriers and facilitators, and a list of corresponding implementation strategies was developed subsequently. Thus, a tailored complex intervention delivered by community workers in the community setting, including the core component of "group elastic-band RE," and supplementary components of "community education, feedback, goal setting, and reinforcement guidance" was developed.

Discussion and Implications

This study constructed a list of key barriers and facilitators as well as corresponding implementation strategies for promoting participation in RE among community-dwelling frail older adults. A tailored complex intervention was developed accordingly, which will facilitate the management of frail older adults in the Chinese community setting.

Barriers and facilitators to implementing polypharmacy management frameworks: a theory based qualitative exploration of key stakeholders

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate polypharmacy arises through many factors including deficiencies in prescribing processes. Most research has focused on solutions at the clinician/patient levels with less at the organisational level.

AIM

To explore key stakeholder identified barriers and facilitators to implementation of an organisational level polypharmacy management framework.

METHOD

Qualitative data were collected within the Ministry of Health in Oman. Key stakeholders were purposively sampled encompassing senior representatives of pharmacy, medicine, and nursing directors; healthcare policymakers; patient safety leaders; and academic leaders. A semi-structured interview schedule was developed informed by a recent scoping review and underpinned by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews, which continued until data saturation, were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using the Framework Approach.

RESULTS

Thirteen key stakeholders were interviewed, with representation of each target group. Facilitators largely mapped to the CFIR domain of inner setting (i.e., aspects of stakeholder awareness, the electronic health system and national leadership), intervention characteristic (evidence gaps), characteristics of individuals (stakeholders and champions) and process (change strategy). Barriers also largely mapped to the inner setting (policy absence, communication and health professional practice) and outer setting (resource needs).

CONCLUSION

This study has illuminated the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of an organisational level polypharmacy management framework. Further work is required to translate these themes into an actionable plan to implement the framework. Particular attention is required for aspects of the CFIR domain of inner setting (i.e., the internal context within which implementation occurs) as most barriers mapped to this domain.

Barriers and facilitators to the dissemination of national movement behavior guidelines among health-promoting organizations: a qualitative study

Background

National movement behavior guidelines offer evidence-informed recommendations for how to obtain health benefits. However, their impact on practice and policy has been limited. Factors at multiple levels determine the effective mobilization of knowledge into practice. Historically, little attention has been paid to assessing the social, organizational, and economic factors that influence the uptake of national movement behavior guidelines; potentially contributing to their blunted impact on public health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators experienced by intermediary organizations to disseminating national movement behavior guidelines.

Methods

Representatives from organizations involved in the development and dissemination of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults 18-64 Years and Adults 65 Years or Older were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to explore barriers and facilitators to national movement behavior guideline dissemination. Interview guides were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Fourteen interviews were conducted, and transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Identified barriers and facilitators were mapped onto the CFIR.

Results

Participants identified several elements that have the potential to influence the dissemination of national movement behavior guidelines, such as organizational alignment, resources (i.e., time, human, financial), and ownership of the guidelines.

Conclusion

This study provides insight into the breadth of barriers and facilitators to guideline dissemination that may be experienced by intermediary organizations. Findings may be used to inform interventions designed to improve the dissemination and uptake of national movement behavior guidelines among health-promoting organizations.

Implementing a Patient Portal for the Remote Follow-Up of Self-Isolating Patients With COVID-19 Infection Through Patient and Stakeholder Engagement (the Opal-COVID Study): Mixed Methods Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic was an unprecedent challenge to public health systems, with 95% of cases in Quebec sent home for self-isolation. To ensure continuous care, we implemented an intervention supported by a patient portal (Opal) to remotely monitor at-home patients with COVID-19 via daily self-reports of symptoms, vital signs, and mental health that were reviewed by health care professionals.

OBJECTIVE

We describe the intervention's implementation, focusing on the (1) process; (2) outcomes, including feasibility, fidelity, acceptability, usability, and perceived response burden; and (3) barriers and facilitators encountered by stakeholders.

METHODS

The implementation followed a co-design approach operationalized through patient and stakeholder engagement. The intervention included a 14-day follow-up for each patient. In the mixed methods study at the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, Quebec, participants completed questionnaires on implementation outcomes on days 1, 7, and 14. All scores were examined against predefined success thresholds. Linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations were used to assess changes in scores over time and whether they differed by sex, age, and race. Semistructured interviews were conducted with expert patients, health care professionals, and coordinators for the qualitative analysis and submitted to thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

RESULTS

In total, 51 participants were enrolled between December 2020 and March 2021; 49 (96%) were included in the quantitative analysis. Observed recruitment and retention rates (51/52, 98% and 49/51, 96%) met the 75% feasibility success threshold. Over 80% of the participants found it "quite easy/very easy" to complete the daily self-report, with a completion rate (fidelity) of >75% and a nonsignificant decreasing trend over time (from 100%, 49/49 to 82%, 40/49; P=.21). Mean acceptability and usability scores at all time points exceeded the threshold of 4 out of 5. Acceptability scores increased significantly between at least 2 time points (days 1, 7, and 14: mean 4.06, SD 0.57; mean 4.26, SD 0.59; and mean 4.25, SD 0.57; P=.04). Participants aged >50 years reported significantly lower mean ease of use (usability) scores than younger participants (days 1, 7, and 14: mean 4.29, SD 0.91 vs mean 4.67, SD 0.45; mean 4.13, SD 0.89 vs mean 4.77, SD 0.35; and mean 4.24, SD 0.71 vs mean 4.72, SD 0.71; P=.004). In total, 28 stakeholders were interviewed between June and September 2021. Facilitators included a structured implementation process, a focus on stakeholders' recommendations, the adjustability of the intervention, and the team's emphasis on safety. However, Opal's thorough privacy protection measures and limited acute follow-up capacities were identified as barriers, along with implementation delays due to data security-related institutional barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention attained targets across all studied implementation outcomes. Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of stakeholder engagement. Telehealth tools have potential for the remote follow-up of acute health conditions.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.2196/35760.

"You know, it feels like you can trust them": mixed methods implementation research to inform the scale up of a health disparities-responsive COVID-19 school testing program

BACKGROUND

Health disparities lead to negative COVID-19 outcomes for Hispanic/Latino communities. Rapid antigen testing was an important mitigation tool for protecting schools and their communities as in-person learning resumed. Within the context of a 3-middle-school non-inferiority trial we assessed acceptability and appropriateness of at-home and school-based COVID-19 antigen testing and implementation barriers and facilitators to facilitate district-wide scale up.

METHODS

Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and acceptability and appropriateness implementation outcomes, we collected post-implementation qualitative (n = 30) and quantitative (n = 454) data in English and Spanish from trial participants, in-depth feedback sessions among program implementers (n = 19) and coded 137 project meeting minutes. Verbatim transcripts were thematically analyzed. We used multivariate linear models to evaluate program acceptability and appropriateness by COVID-19 testing modality and mixed qualitative and quantitative findings for interpretation.

RESULTS

Questionnaire respondents closely matched school demographics (> 80% Hispanic/Latino and 8% Filipino/Asian Pacific Islander). While both testing modalities were rated as highly acceptable and appropriate, at-home testing was consistently favorable. Qualitative findings provided actionable areas for at-home testing program refinement, guiding district-wide scale up including: maintaining a learning climate to accommodate modifications as guidelines changed, needs of the school community, and implementation challenges; ensuring an engaged school leadership and sufficient human resources; improving educational communication about COVID-19 and technology ease of use; and increased time for pre-implementation planning and engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Results underscore the value of the CFIR to inform program implementation, particularly programs to reduce disparities during a public health emergency. Results support optimal testing implementation strategies centering the needs and perspectives of Hispanic/Latinos.

Redesigning the Hospital Environment to Improve Restfulness

Importance

Hospital wards are often not conducive to patient sleep, negatively affecting patient health and experience.

Objectives

To assess determinants of in-hospital restfulness and to design and test rest-promoting interventions on the wards in partnership with clinicians, staff, and patients.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This rapid-sequential mixed-methods quality improvement study was performed at a large urban academic hospital in St Louis, Missouri, from May 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, with follow-up through hospitalization. Mixed-methods activities involved purposively selected hospitalized adults on the wards, nurses, hospitalists, and hospital staff. Interventions included all adult hospitalizations on the study wards.

Interventions

Sequential stacked bundles of multimodal rest-promoting interventions (general education, focused education on light or noise, safely reducing overnight monitoring or testing, and environmental personalization).

Main Outcomes and Measurements

Pre-post comparisons of perceived nighttime quietness (via surveys) and sleep opportunity (coprimary outcomes) as well as clinical interruptions overnight, environmental noise, and adoption and satisfaction.

Results

Nine patients (4 female) and 14 staff members (10 female; 3 nurse managers or administrators, 10 nurses, and 1 physician) were interviewed, 38 surveys were collected, and more than 100 hours of observation were performed. Interventions were evaluated for 671 patients (mean [SD] age, 60 [16] years; 336 [50%] female). Determinants of in-hospital rest included infrastructure, staff attitudes, priorities, culture, and patient experiences of anxiety, uncertainty, and loss of control. Informed by these determinants, codesign workshops yielded 39 potential interventions, from which 9 were selected for testing. Related interventions were organized into bundles, which were tested in sequential 2-week sprints. Perceived nighttime quietness improved nonsignificantly during the project (wards "always" quiet at night: 51% preintervention vs 86% postintervention; P = .09), with excessive noise events decreasing from 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53-0.77) to 0 per 100 patient-nights before the intervention (P = .02). Sleep opportunity improved significantly (mean, 4.94 [95% CI, 4.82-5.06] hours per patient-night before the intervention vs 5.10 [95% CI, 5.00-5.20] hours per patient-night after the intervention; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this quality improvement study, a set of feasible, acceptable, and beneficial rest-promoting interventions were developed. After implementation of these interventions on the wards, a significant improvement in nighttime quietness and sleep opportunity was observed. These results demonstrate how human-centered design methods can generate practical and effective strategies for improving an important patient-related outcome and a core element of patient experience.

Identifying anticipated challenges when implementing group care: Context-analyses across seven countries to develop an anticipated challenges framework

PROBLEM

Despite increasing interest in Group Care worldwide, implementation is challenging.

BACKGROUND

Group Care is an evidence-based perinatal care model including three core components: health assessment, interactive learning, and community building. It has several advantages for service users and providers compared to individual perinatal care.

AIM

We aimed to identify anticipated challenges when implementing Group Care, and to develop a supporting tool based on these challenges.

METHODS

Context analyses through Rapid Qualitative Inquiries were conducted in 26 sites in seven countries to gain insight into the anticipated challenges when implementing Group Care. Data triangulation and investigator triangulation were applied. The context analyses generated 330 semi-structured interviews with service users and other stakeholders, 10 focus group discussions, and 56 review meetings with the research teams.

FINDINGS

We identified six surface structure anticipated challenges categories (content, materials, facilitators, timing, location, group composition), and five deep structure anticipated challenges categories (health assessment, scheduling Group Care into regular care, enrolment, (possible) partner organisations, financials) occurring in all participating sites, leading to the development of the Anticipated Challenges Framework.

CONCLUSION

Completing the Anticipated Challenges Framework raises awareness of anticipated challenges if sustainable Group Care implementation is to succeed and encourages the initiation of a concrete action plan to tackle these challenges. Application of the framework may offer important insights to health systems administrators and other key stakeholders before implementing Group Care. In the medium- and long-term, insights gained may lead to greater possibilities for sustainability and to the most cost-effective approaches for implementing Group Care.

[ePROs in the routine care of a major oncology center: Results and experiences]

BACKGROUND

To what extent and under what conditions electronically captured patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can be used in routine medical care and contribute to improved patient care is a widely discussed question. In the field of oncology, few studies in Germany have focused this topic that go beyond the scope of time-limited studies.

METHOD

First, we present the centrally coordinated collection of ePROs in the routine care of a comprehensive cancer center of the German Cancer Aid in its development, and then describe its qualitative dimension. Subsequently, the intervention is discussed using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research.

RESULTS

Since the implementation started in 2019, over 2,000 patients from the interdisciplinary outpatient clinic of the oncology center have been surveyed. The number of respondents varied between 19 and 65 per month. Over the five years of the reporting period, numerous adjustments have been made regarding content and usage purposes as well as technical and personnel structures. The consistent purpose of use was screening for supportive needs, initially related to psycho-oncology, later expanded to include sports therapy, smoking cessation programs, social and nutritional counseling. The instruments used varied accordingly; health-related quality of life and psychological stress were consistently surveyed.

DISCUSSION

Successful use of ePROs in oncological routine care requires personnel and technical resources as well as a high degree of adaptability. In our case, the complexity of a centrally coordinated ePRO collection within an interdisciplinary cancer center is of particular importance. Path dependencies arising from initial decisions, such as the survey software, need to be considered during implementation. Reservations about the intervention and the importance of opinion leaders for successful deployment have been observed. External conditions such as the certification system of oncology centers in Germany proved to be another relevant factor.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the analysis examines a segment of the ongoing digitization process of the hospital system directed towards needs-based, individualized patient care.

"It's Like Making Reflective Practice More of the Heart of Who We Are": An Exploration of Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Reflective Supervision in State Pre-K

High-quality supervision for teachers in early care and education (ECE) is essential for building positive teacher-child relationships and enhancing ECE program quality, which in turn promotes healthy social-emotional and academic development in young children. Reflective supervision (RS) is a process-oriented and relationship-centered supervisory approach that has growing empirical evidence supporting its use. As the evidence base for RS continues to expand, and early childhood-serving settings-including ECE-increasingly consider this approach, understanding whether RS is likely to be routinely used in ECE settings and what helps or hinders use of this approach is critically important. Thus, the aims of this study were to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of RS in state-funded pre-Kindergarten (state pre-K) programs, as well as delineate the implementation determinants that either advanced or challenged the use of RS in state pre-K. This study was informed and guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the CFIR Outcomes Addendum. Participants included 11 state pre-K program supervisors who had been trained in RS. Participants completed brief measures of feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of RS, and semi-structured interviews. Descriptive analyses of quantitative measures revealed that participants perceived RS as feasible to implement in their programs, highly acceptable, and highly appropriate, thereby suggesting that RS is likely to be implemented successfully in this setting. Qualitative data obtained from interviews and coded using the updated CFIR lent greater nuance to these results by specifying the facilitators and barriers affecting implementation. All participants reported great need for RS at the supervisor, teacher, and child/family level, and identified numerous other facilitating factors within four CFIR domains (i.e., Innovation, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, and Individuals), ranging from the relative advantage of RS to individual supervisor motivation and capability. Participants also cited barriers to using RS, most notably staffing difficulties, competing demands, and lack of policy and leadership support. Through theory-driven implementation frameworks applied to a real-world ECE setting, these findings extend prior research suggesting that RS may be an effective supervisory approach by highlighting the contextual factors that make RS more or less likely to be adopted, used, and sustained in state pre-K.

Interventions to improve patient admission and discharge practices in adult intensive care units: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To identify and synthesise interventions and implementation strategies to optimise patient flow, addressing admission delays, discharge delays, and after-hours discharges in adult intensive care units.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Five electronic databases, including CINAHL, PubMed, Emcare, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, were searched from 2007 to 2023 to identify articles describing interventions to enhance patient flow practices in adult intensive care units. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. All data was synthesised using a narrative approach.

SETTING

Adult intensive care units.

RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, mainly comprising quality improvement projects (n = 3) or before-and-after studies (n = 4). Intervention types included changing workflow processes, introducing decision support tools, publishing quality indicator data, utilising outreach nursing services, and promoting multidisciplinary communication. Various implementation strategies were used, including one-on-one training, in-person knowledge transfer, digital communication, and digital data synthesis and display. Most studies (n = 6) reported a significant improvement in at least one intensive care process-related outcome, although fewer studies specifically reported improvements in admission delays (0/0), discharge delays (1/2), and after-hours discharge (2/4). Two out of six studies reported significant improvements in patient-related outcomes after implementing the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Organisational-level strategies, such as protocols and alert systems, were frequently employed to improve patient flow within ICUs, while healthcare professional-level strategies to enhance communication were less commonly used. While most studies improved ICU processes, only half succeeded in significantly reducing discharge delays and/or after-hours discharges, and only a third reported improved patient outcomes, highlighting the need for more effective interventions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The findings of this review can guide the development of evidence-based, targeted, and tailored interventions aimed at improving patient and organisational outcomes.

Telepharmacy for outpatients with cancer: An implementation evaluation of videoconsults compared to telephone consults using the CFIR 2.0

Background

Medication history telepharmacy consults are conducted prior to patients commencing their systemic anti-cancer therapy. At the study institution, this has historically been carried out as an unscheduled telephone consult. However, due to challenges with telephone consults, a scheduled videoconsult model was established. Funding, time efficiency, and completion rate for videoconsults compared to telephone consults have been examined previously.

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine staff perceptions of the factors that influence implementation, including enablers and barriers, for videoconsults compared to telephone consults, to inform model sustainability.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff (n = 14) involved with the videoconsult service, or who provided care for patients who had a videoconsult. Interviews were coded for positive or negative influence and strength using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0, to understand which constructs influence implementation.

Results

Thirty-nine of the 79 constructs, from across four domains were identified as influences for the telephone and videoconsult models. Six constructs were strongly differentiating for videoconsults over telephone consults. Of the 25 positively influencing constructs for the videoconsult model, strongest ratings (+2) were given for innovation advantages, critical incidents, support persons assisting in the consult, financing related to funding reimbursement, and telehealth coordinator capability and motivation. Barriers unique to the videoconsult model included the many steps that were involved, compatibility with workflows, and pharmacist resource. Similarities and differences unique to each model were identified.

Conclusion

Findings demonstrated a number of strongly differentiating constructs highlighting superiority of the videoconsult model. However, implementation of both models had multiple enablers and barriers that may influence adoption. The potential of a hybrid service, using both telephone consults and videoconsults, may help optimise delivery of services.

How Can Implementation Science Advance Behavioral Interventions in Preschool? A Scoping Review and Recommendations

Behavioral interventions delivered in preschools can help young children who need support for their behavior. However, preschool teachers face barriers to implementing behavioral interventions, leading to a research-to-practice gap. To better understand how to support preschool teachers, we conducted a scoping review of determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators) and strategies used to support the implementation of behavioral interventions in preschool settings. A systematic search identified peer-reviewed manuscripts describing the implementation of teacher-delivered behavioral interventions in preschools. Each included manuscript was evaluated to answer the following questions: (1) what determinants to teacher implementation of behavioral interventions have been explored and (2) what strategies have been identified as promising in addressing determinants (i.e., implementation strategies)? Twenty-two manuscripts met inclusion criteria. Data extraction and synthesis were used to summarize key findings. Results indicate that few studies have explored determinants of implementation, and while these determinants span numerous implementation domains, there was little consensus on common determinants. In contrast, all the included studies deployed an implementation strategy, and there were two clear foci of the strategies: training and quality monitoring. Implications and recommendations are discussed for both the preschool context and the implementation science field.

Developing Pre-Implementation Strategies for a Co-Designed, Technology-Assisted Parenting Intervention Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Approach

BACKGROUND

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are a major risk factor for mental disorders in children. Parenting interventions can mitigate the impact of family-level ACEs and subsequently improve young people's mental health. However, a substantial research-to-practice gap hinders access to, and uptake of, available interventions.

AIM

This study aimed to develop actionable strategies to support the implementation of an evidence-based, co-designed, technology-assisted parenting intervention by understanding potential barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of service providers working with families of children experiencing ACEs.

METHODS

We conducted one-on-one interviews with 14 staff at a community health service (six managers, eight service providers). A theoretical thematic analysis was used. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided the data collection and analysis of barriers and facilitators. Pre-implementation strategies were informed by The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation. The CFIR-ERIC matching tool was used to match the CFIR barriers identified by participants in this study with ERIC strategies to overcome these barriers.

RESULTS

Fourteen CFIR constructs were identified as facilitators, and eleven as barriers. By using the CFIR-ERIC tool, eleven strategies to mitigate the barriers were identified. Most strategies were aligned to the ERIC clusters Use evaluative and iterative strategies (n = 4) and Develop stakeholder interrelationships (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The CFIR-ERIC approach offered relevant and concise pre-implementation strategies for addressing potential barriers to implementing a novel, co-designed, technology-assisted parenting intervention for parents of children with ACEs. The identified facilitators support the utility of co-designing interventions as an initial phase in bridging research-to-practice gaps. Healthcare settings aiming to innovate services with technology-assisted parenting interventions to improve child mental health can draw on findings from the current study to guide pre-implementation plans for innovative, technology-assisted parenting interventions to improve child mental health.

Barriers and facilitators to using procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients (under 1 year old): protocol for a mixed studies systematic review with a narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

The management of procedural pain in pediatric patients under 1 year old is crucial but often inadequately addressed in clinical practice. Despite proven evidence-based interventions like skin-to-skin contact, sweet solutions, and breastfeeding, their implementation remains sporadic. This systematic review aims to uncover the barriers and facilitators to adopting these interventions, leveraging the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to provide a structured analysis.

METHODS

This review will examine primary studies identifying barriers or facilitators to the use of procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients under 1 year old, imposing no restrictions on the publication year or language. A thorough search will cover databases such as MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) will be utilized for quality assessment. The CFIR framework will serve to categorize and analyze the identified barriers and facilitators, using narrative synthesis for data integration.

DISCUSSION

Applying the CFIR framework allows for a comprehensive and systematic review of the factors influencing the implementation of procedural pain management strategies in pediatric care. By identifying key barriers and facilitators through this lens, the review will guide the development of targeted interventions aimed at enhancing the adoption of evidence-based pain treatments. Such strategic interventions are essential for bridging the gap between research findings and clinical practice, potentially improving the effectiveness and efficiency of pain management for pediatric patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022322319.

Exploring Determinants of Effective Implementation of an Innovation Within Health Care: Qualitative Insights from Program Champions on Implementing One-at-a-Time Therapy Within Addictions and Mental Health Services in New Brunswick

Government of New Brunswick implemented One-at-a-Time (OAAT) therapy, a single-session approach to care, within Addiction and Mental Health (A&MH) services. We conducted interviews to understand determinants of implementation from program champions. Champions of the OAAT therapy implementation (N = 19; Child/Youth n = 8, Adult n = 11) working within A&MH services and school districts were recruited through the provincial implementation team. Transcripts were synthesized using thematic analysis. Determinants were organized as facilitators and barriers in accordance with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Thematic analysis resulted in 18 themes and 5 recommendations. Facilitators within the inner setting included: (1) need for change and perceived benefits of OAAT therapy; (2) compatibility of OAAT therapy with previous practice and service processes; and (3) support received from champions and colleagues. Insufficient resources (e.g., staff and physical infrastructure), and a culture that favored long-term therapy were barriers. Navigating age of consent, and implementation around COVID-19 were barriers within the outer setting. Facilitators within the implementation process domain included: (1) interconnected teams across sites, regions and the province; (2) collaborative implementation planning; (3) flexibility to tailor implementation at sites; and (4) mentorship provided by champions. Insufficient standardization of the implementation and limited representation among affected parties (e.g., community partners) were barriers within the implementation process. This study elucidated determinants that influenced implementation of a new service delivery within an Eastern Canadian provincial health care system. Findings can serve as a heuristic for organizations looking to enact similar implementation initiatives.

Barriers and facilitators to high-volume evidence-based innovation and implementation in a large, community-based learning health system

BACKGROUND

Broad-scale, rapid health care change is critically needed to improve value-based, effective health care. Health care providers and systems need to address common barriers and facilitators across the evidence to implementation pathway, across diverse specialties. However, most evidence translation / implementation research evaluates single topic areas, and may be of limited value for informing comprehensive efforts. This project's objective was to identify, characterize, and illustrate common trans-topic facilitators and barriers of translating new health care evidence results to clinical implementation across multiple medical specialties.

METHODS

This study was an evaluation of all evidence-based innovation projects completed during 2019-2021. Each project was created with medical group clinical leaders and was intended to inform clinical care. The evaluation took place in a large community-based integrated health care system, and an embedded delivery science and applied research program. Clinical investigators, scientific investigators, and clinical operational leaders received structured questionnaires regarding barriers and facilitators for the operational implementation of new research findings for each project. Responses were mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify perceived implementation barriers and facilitators.

RESULTS

All 48 projects completed between 2019 and 2021 were evaluated; responses were received for 45 (94%) and 34 had comments mappable to framework domains. Potential barriers and facilitators to clinical implementation of new research results were identified across all five framework domains and, within these, the 38 constructs or sub-constructs. Among 245 total comments, the most commonly cited facilitators were how the new research evidence generated, compelled change (n = 29), specialty communication networks for disseminating results and initiating change (n = 20), leadership engagement in the project (n = 19), and the innovation's relative advantage over existing practices (n = 11). The most commonly cited barriers were inadequate resource commitment for next-step implementation (n = 15), insufficient learning/implementation culture (n = 5), and insufficient individual-level willingness/ability for change (n = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel large-scale evaluation of barriers and facilitators across the evidence to implementation pathway identified common factors across multiple topic areas and specialties. These common potentially replicable facilitators and modifiable barriers can focus health systems and leaders pursuing large-volume evidence-to-implementation initiatives on those areas with the likely greatest benefit-for-effort, for accelerating health care change.

Diagnostics for optimised dengue surveillance: a qualitative focus group study to investigate user experience and requirements in Thailand

OBJECTIVES

Effective, real-time surveillance of dengue may provide early warning of outbreaks and support targeted disease-control intervention but requires widespread accurate diagnosis and timely case reporting. Research directing innovation in diagnostics for dengue surveillance is lacking. This study aimed to describe experience and requirements of relevant prospective users.

DESIGN

A qualitative, focus group study was conducted.

PARTICIPANTS

Data were collected from 19 users of diagnostic technology who work across the Thai dengue surveillance system.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Contextual knowledge, experience and needs were explored in focus groups. Discussions were translated, transcribed, analysed thematically and mapped to Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains.

RESULTS

Participants expressed a need for rapid, accurate, serotype-specific tests which can be operated easily by non-expert users without laboratory equipment. They supported integration of diagnostics with surveillance systems and felt this would increase the quantity and speed of case reporting as well as provide healthcare professionals with up-to-date information about the number of cases locally, thereby aiding interpretation of test results. Concerns included those relating to data security and the cost of tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Engagement to understand prospective user experience and requirements can improve relevance and uptake of new technology, leading to system efficiencies. The present study highlights specific needs for accurate, serotype-specific, remote-connected diagnostics which are integrated with surveillance systems and support dengue case reporting at the point-of-care.

A consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) guided exploration of key informant perspectives on establishing a pharmacist-led anticoagulation service in primary care: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Globally, pharmacist-led anticoagulation services have improved patient outcomes in secondary and tertiary care settings. However, there is a paucity of literature about establishing such services within primary care settings.

AIM

This study explored key informants' perceptions regarding the systemic and procedural factors influencing development and implementation of a pharmacist-led anticoagulation service in a primary care setting.

METHOD

A descriptive qualitative study was conducted at Qatar's largest primary healthcare institution, the Primary Health Care Corporation (PHCC). Selected key informants, including healthcare center managers, pharmacy leads, physician leads and primary care physicians with cardiology privileges, were purposively recruited. Semi-structured interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and analyzed using framework analysis.

RESULTS

Elven key informants were interviewed. The participants expressed confidence in the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing anticoagulation service in primary care to address patients' needs. Key factors (mapped to CFIR domains) included ensuring pharmacist competency (Characteristics of Individuals), establishing effective internal and external communication (Inner and Outer Setting), and addressing staffing shortages (Inner Setting). Participants also emphasized on developing standardized operational protocols and training programs (Process), as well as integrating services with secondary care (Outer Setting). Despite challenges such as staffing, participants believed the service would effectively address patient needs if adequately supported.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of pharmacist-led anticoagulation services in primary care settings was identified as both feasible and essential for improving patient outcomes. The insights from this study can inform future initiatives aimed at enhancing anticoagulation management in primary care settings.

CTN-0138: adaptation, implementation, and cluster randomized trial of a Community Pharmacy-Based Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Opioid Risk Assessment Tool-a protocol paper

BACKGROUND

As the opioid epidemic continues to have a major negative impact across the US, community pharmacies have come under scrutiny from legal systems attempting to hold them accountable for their role in over dispensing and lack of patient intervention. While the most available tool for monitoring patients' opioid use is Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMP), these do not provide pharmacists with actionable information and decision support. Our study addresses this gap through three objectives: [1] incorporate validated opioid risk metric thresholds into a PDMP platform to create the Opioid Risk Reduction Clinical Decision Support (ORRCDS) tool; [2] assess ORRCDS' ability to reduce patient opioid risk; [3] assess ORRCDS' sustainability and viability for broader dissemination in community pharmacy.

METHODS

For objective 1, our team is partnering with leadership from the largest US PDMP organization and a top-five pharmacy chain to implement ORRCDS into the pharmacy chain's workflow following the Guideline Implementation with Decision Support (GUIDES) framework. For objective 2, our team will conduct a type-1 implementation mixed methods study using a 2-arm parallel group clustered randomized design. We anticipate enrolling ~ 6,600 patients with moderate and high opioid use risk during the 6-month enrollment phase across 80 pharmacies. This sample size will provide 96.3% power to detect a 5% or greater difference in responder rate between the intervention and control arm. Responders are patients with moderate-risk at baseline who reduce to low-risk or those with high-risk at baseline who reduce to moderate or low-risk at 180 days post last intervention. To accomplish objective 3, we will use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to develop and execute cross-sectional qualitative interviews with pharmacists (n = 15), pharmacy leaders (n = 15), and PDMP leaders (n = 15) regarding long term adoption and sustainability of the ORRCDS tool.

CONCLUSIONS

A PDMP tool that addresses moderate- and high-risk opioid use is not available in community pharmacy. This study will implement ORRCDS in a large retail pharmacy chain that will include additional screening and guidance to pharmacy staff to address risky opioid medication use. Our results will make critical advancements for protecting patient health and addressing the opioid epidemic.

Benefits of applying standardized frameworks to implement psychosocial tools such as the 'My Logbook'

PURPOSE

Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are essential to improve the well-being and neurocognitive outcomes of pediatric cancer patients; however, considerable barriers hamper the implementation of these tools. The present study assessed health care professionals' (HCP) perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a specific EBI for pediatric oncology in a standardized manner to define effective solutions and practical recommendations.

METHODS

An adapted version of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) questionnaire was applied to inquire n = 31 HCPs in pediatric oncology about the five domains of implementation.

RESULTS

While most 'intervention characteristics' were considered beneficial for implementation, various aspects of the 'inner' and 'outer setting' were considered problematic. The most prevalent barriers included a shortage in resources, poor integration of EBIs into policies and lacking incentives such as user benefits. Concrete proposed and realized steps to facilitate effective implementation include a patient-focused design and continuous evaluation and adaption of the tool, a detailed EBI user manual and application workshops, as well as regular interdisciplinary meetings to improve communication. Regarding the internal and external settings, involving policy makers, establishing psychosocial care in the insurance system and increasing awareness by sharing evidence are essential steps for improved implementation.

CONCLUSION

Based on standardized implementation evaluation, various targeted actions could be defined and implemented to facilitate successful implementation of EBIs in pediatric oncology. The results emphasize that psychosocial care must become an integral part of treatment standards and public health policies to ensure that effective psychosocial interventions for improved wellbeing and neurocognitive skills successfully reach pediatric cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04474678 (July 17th 2020).

Leveraging Implementation Science at the Early-Stage Development of a Novel Telehealth-Delivered Fear of Exercise Program to Understand Intervention Feasibility and Implementation Potential: Feasibility Behavioral Intervention Study

BACKGROUND

To increase real-world adoption of effective telehealth-delivered behavioral health interventions among midlife and older adults with cardiovascular disease, incorporating implementation science (IS) methods at earlier stages of intervention development may be needed.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe how IS can be incorporated into the design and interpretation of a study assessing the feasibility and implementation potential of a technology-delivered behavioral health intervention.

METHODS

We assessed the feasibility and implementation potential of a 2-session, remotely delivered, home-based behavioral intervention composed of psychoeducation, interoceptive exposure through low-to-moderate intensity walking, interoceptive counseling, and homework (Reducing Exercise Sensitivity with Exposure Training; RESET) among patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and some fear of exercise. To assess intervention feasibility, we measured patient protocol adherence, intervention delivery fidelity, and completion of intervention outcome assessments using direct observations, fidelity checklists, surveys, and device-measured physical activity. To assess implementation potential, we measured implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness) using 4-item measures, each rated from the patient perspective on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree; criteria: ≥4=agree or completely agree), and patient-perceived implementation determinants and design feedback using survey and interview data. Interview data underwent thematic analysis to identify implementation determinant themes, which were then categorized into Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains and constructs.

RESULTS

Of 31 patients approached during recruitment, 3 (10%) were eligible, enrolled, and completed the study (mean age 46.3, SD 14.0 y; 2/3, 67% male; 1/3, 33% Black; and 1/3, 33% Asian). The intervention was delivered with fidelity for all participants, and all participants completed the entire intervention protocol and outcome assessments. On average, participants agreed that the RESET intervention was feasible and acceptable, while appropriateness ratings did not meet implementation criteria (feasibility: mean 4.2, SD 0.4; acceptability: mean 4.3, SD 0.7; and appropriateness: mean 3.7, SD 0.4). Key patient-perceived implementation determinants were related to constructs in the innovation (design, adaptability, and complexity), inner setting (available resources [physical space, funding, materials, and equipment] and access to knowledge and information), and innovation recipient characteristics (motivation, capability, opportunity, and need) domains of the CFIR, with key barriers related to innovation design. Design feedback indicated that the areas requiring the most revisions were the interoceptive exposure design and the virtual delivery modality, and reasons why included low dose and poor usability.

CONCLUSIONS

The RESET intervention was feasible but not implementable in a small sample of patients with ACS. Our theory-informed, mixed methods approach aided our understanding of what, how, and why RESET was not perceived as implementable; this information will guide intervention refinement. This study demonstrated how integrating IS methods early in intervention development can guide decisions regarding readiness to advance interventions along the translational research pipeline.

Acceptability, barriers and facilitators of using dried blood spots-point-of-care testing for sickle cell disease in Africa: an implementation science protocol for a multinational qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a prevalent inherited blood disorder. Globally, approximately 515 000 babies are born with SCD annually, with 75% of these births occurring in Africa. Integrating newborn screening (NBS) for SCD into primary healthcare structures, such as immunisation programmes, holds significant promise, with dried blood spots (DBS)-point-of-care technologies (POCT) like HaemoTypeSC offering cost-effective screening solutions. However, scaling up DBS-POCT for NBS of SCD in Africa remains challenging.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore individual, organisational and external factors that may influence the reliability, feasibility, acceptability, adoption and sustainability of using DBS-POCT with HaemoTypeSC for NBS of SCD at primary healthcare centres in African countries.

METHOD

This qualitative study will be conducted in seven African countries that are part of the SickleInAfrica consortium sites. The study design is informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Implementation Outcome Model. Participants will be mothers whose babies have been diagnosed with SCD, healthcare professionals and policy-makers. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions will be used for data collection. Data analysis will be through thematic analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Research ethics approvals have been obtained from the seven countries. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals, scientific conferences, reports to national ministries of public health and webinars.

Implementation of an integrated community approach in deprived neighbourhoods: a theory-based process evaluation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

BACKGROUND

We investigated the implementation process of an Integrated Community Approach (ICA) applied in four low socio-economic status neighbourhoods in Maastricht, the Netherlands. The ICA is a Population Health Management initiative and aims to improve population health, quality of care, professional's satisfaction and decrease costs of care. This study addresses the facilitators and barriers for implementing the ICA from a stakeholder perspective, including steering group members, professionals and citizens.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods study using a triangulation of methods to investigate the implementation from 1 December 2016 to 31 December 2020. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided data collection and data-analysis for evaluating the implementation process. In total, 77 interviews, 97 observations, seven focus groups, 65 collected documents and two surveys with open-ended questions were conducted.

RESULTS

Facilitators for implementation were the use of citizen science to bring residents' needs into sharp focus, the integration of the ideology of Positive Health into the working routines of the professionals and leadership at the steering group level to overcome barriers in the ICA. The existing accounting and financial infrastructure obstructed combining budgets at neighbourhood level.

CONCLUSIONS

Engaging citizens and professionals at an early stage is an important facilitator for implementation. The use of a shared vision on health also worked as a facilitator since it created a shared language among professionals, which is important in Population Health Management initiatives where multiple professionals are expected to collaborate.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NTR 6543; registration date, 25 July 2017.