1
|
Qian Q, Shi J. Accustomed or Regulated: Influencing factors of two-wheeler riders' illegal Lane-Transgressing behavior when overtaking. ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 2024; 204:107648. [PMID: 38833986 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Illegal lane-transgressing is a typical aberrant riding behavior of riders of two-wheelers, i.e., motorcycles, bicycles, and e-bikes, which is highly frequent in accident reports. However, there is insufficient attention to this behavior at present. This study aims to explore the socio-psychologic factors that influence the illegal lane-transgressing behavior of two-wheeler riders when overtaking. For this purpose, a questionnaire was first composed. The questionnaire included the behavioral intention of two-wheeler riders towards illegal overtaking behavior and five influencing factors: safety knowledge, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, perceived behavior control, and risk perception. Second, a survey was conducted on different two-wheeler riders in Xi'an. Third, various types of two-wheelers were analyzed jointly and separately by structural equation models and analyses of variance. Results show that e-bike riders were more similar to motorcycle riders in behavioral intentions, with their risk perception weaker than other riders. Descriptive norms and perceived behavior control played the most significant roles in the structural equation model. It was also found that two-wheeler riders with a car license had better traffic safety performance. Based on the above results, it is recommended that attention be paid to illegal lane-transgression in the process of law enforcement and education, and a higher level of safety training should be provided for two-wheeler riders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Qian
- Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Shi
- Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gallant AJ, Steenbeek A, Halperin SA, Parsons Leigh J, Curran JA. Operationalizing the Behaviour Change Wheel and APEASE criteria to co-develop recommendations with stakeholders to address barriers to school-based immunization programs. Vaccine 2024; 42:126226. [PMID: 39173194 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION School-based immunization programs offer an accessible route to routine vaccines for students. During the COVID-19 pandemic, school closures to comply with public health measures had a drastic effect on school-based immunization program delivery and associated vaccine uptake. We sought to integrate findings from a mixed methods study to co-develop evidence-based and theory-informed recommendations with a diverse group of stakeholders (i.e., decision makers, healthcare providers, school staff, parents and adolescent students) to address barriers to new and existing school-based immunization programs. METHODS Findings from a mixed methods study were integrated using a joint display and narrative summary. These findings were mapped through the Behaviour Change Wheel, a series of tools designed to facilitate the development of behaviour change interventions. Draft recommendations were provided to previous mixed methods study participants who consented to participating in future phases of the research study (n = 26). Feedback was captured using a Likert-scale survey of acceptability, practicality, effectiveness, affordability, safety and equity (APEASE) criteria, with feedback and additional insights captured using open-ended textboxes. Data was used to revise and finalize recommendations. RESULTS Applying the Behaviour Change Wheel, we drafted 26 evidence-based, theory-informed recommendations to address barriers to school-based immunization programs. Participants (n = 16) provided feedback, with half of the recommendations scoring 80% or higher across all six APEASE criteria. The remaining 13 recommendations received a moderate score across one or more criteria. Stakeholders identified a high level of interest in expanding the use of e-consent forms, expanding programming to offer a meningitis B vaccine, and recommendations to ease student anxiety. CONCLUSION We co-developed a range of recommendations to improve school-based immunization programs with stakeholders using data generated from a mixed methods study. Implementation of any single or combination of recommendations will need to be tailored to local clinic procedures, school system and health system resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson J Gallant
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, 5968 College Street, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS) B3H 4R2, Canada.
| | | | | | | | - Janet A Curran
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dunsmore J, Duncan E, MacLennan S, N'Dow J, MacLennan S. Specifying behavioural and strategy components of de-implementation efforts targeting low-value prescribing practices in secondary health care. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:88. [PMID: 39113160 PMCID: PMC11304722 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00624-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND /Aims De-implementation, including the removal or reduction of unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing, is crucial to ensure patients receive appropriate evidence-based health care. The utilization of de-implementation efforts is contingent on the quality of strategy reporting. To further understand effective ways to de-implement medical practices, specification of behavioural targets and components of de-implementation strategies are required. This paper aims to critically analyse how well the behavioural targets and strategy components, in studies that focused on de-implementing unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing in secondary healthcare settings, were reported. METHODS A supplementary analysis of studies included in a recently published review of de-implementation studies was conducted. Article text was coded verbatim to two established specification frameworks. Behavioural components were coded deductively to the five elements of the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework. Strategy components were mapped to the nine elements of the Proctor's 'measuring implementation strategies' framework. RESULTS The behavioural components of low-value prescribing, as coded to the AACTT framework, were generally specified well. However, the Actor and Time components were often vague or not well reported. Specification of strategy components, as coded to the Proctor framework, were less well reported. Proctor's Actor, Action target: specifying targets, Dose and Justification elements were not well reported or varied in the amount of detail offered. We also offer suggestions of additional specifications to make, such as the 'interactions' participants have with a strategy. CONCLUSION Specification of behavioural targets and components of de-implementation strategies for prescribing practices can be accommodated by the AACTT and Proctor frameworks when used in conjunction. These essential details are required to understand, replicate and successfully de-implement unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing. In general, standardisation in the reporting quality of these components is required to replicate any de-implementation efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eilidh Duncan
- Health Service Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, U.K
| | - Sara MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, U.K
| | - James N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, U.K
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Porter CD, Groves CI, Huong C, Brown DMY. Predicting physical activity behavior among university students using the multi-process action control framework. PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE 2024; 75:102716. [PMID: 39094851 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Most university students do not engage in enough physical activity (PA) despite the known physical and mental health benefits. Action control theories such as the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework have been proposed to better understand the translation of intentions into action by incorporating post-intentional processes. However, the explanatory power of the M-PAC framework beyond traditional social cognitive constructs has received limited attention. This study examined the predictive utility of the M-PAC framework for explaining variance in self-reported and device-measured PA behavior among university students. A total of 2418 undergraduate students (Mean age = 19.1 ± 1.73 [SD] years) completed an online survey that included a self-reported measure of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) as well as constructs outlined in the M-PAC framework: instrumental and affective attitudes, perceived capability and opportunity, behavioral regulation, habit and identity. A subsample (n = 376) also wore an ActiGraph wGT3x-BT accelerometer on their non-dominant wrist for seven full days to assess MVPA. Robust linear regression models were computed to investigate associations between M-PAC framework constructs and PA behavior. Findings showed the M-PAC framework explained as high as 14.3 % and 37.9 % of the variance in device-measured and self-reported MVPA, respectively. Regulatory (behavioral regulation), and reflexive (habit and identity) processes were significant predictors of self-reported MVPA when examining the full M-PAC framework, whereas the role identity dimension of PA identity was the only significant predictor of device-assessed MVPA. Taken together, these results reinforce the importance of post-intentional processes, specifically role identity, in understanding PA behavior among university students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carah D Porter
- The University of Texas at San Antonio, Department of Psychology, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Claire I Groves
- The University of Texas at San Antonio, Department of Psychology, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Christopher Huong
- The University of Texas at San Antonio, Department of Psychology, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Denver M Y Brown
- The University of Texas at San Antonio, Department of Psychology, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grimshaw JM, Levinson W. Reducing low value care: opportunities and challenges for Choosing Wisely campaigns. BMJ Evid Based Med 2024; 29:215-218. [PMID: 37586873 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wendy Levinson
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McGough EL, Thompson HJ. Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:105026. [PMID: 38782040 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically examine implementation strategies within long-term care (LTC) settings. The goal was to identify elements that contribute to adoption and sustainability of evidence-based practices by facilities and frontline health care staff. DESIGN Scoping review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS LTC settings, frontline health care staff and facility administration. METHODS A scoping review of the literature across 3 databases was performed. Two researchers independently assessed literature for inclusion against criteria. The researchers independently extracted data for study characteristics following the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt Categorization. RESULTS Eleven studies examining implementation of a new evidence-based intervention into LTC settings met inclusion requirements. The types of new interventions shared a common classification within the Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) taxonomy, with all belonging to the Coordination of Care and Management of Care Processes category. All studies had frontline health care staff as the target of implementation strategies. Barriers to implementation included intervention timing in relation to workflow and workload, lack of interest in or skepticism regarding the new intervention, as well as perceptions that the intervention was not within scope or training. Face-to-face communication and asynchronous training were viewed positively, as was having a peer champion available for support. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The results from this review highlight the importance of including communication strategies that use face-to-face delivery and peer champion approaches for successful implementation of new evidence-based interventions. Key implementation strategies also included education tailored to an individual's training and experience level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen L McGough
- Physical Therapy Department, University of Rhode Island, RI, USA.
| | - Hilaire J Thompson
- Biobehavioral Nursing & Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tutty E, Archibald AD, Downie L, Gaff C, Lunke S, Vears DF, Stark Z, Best S. Key informant perspectives on implementing genomic newborn screening: a qualitative study guided by the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time framework. Eur J Hum Genet 2024:10.1038/s41431-024-01650-7. [PMID: 38907005 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01650-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) programmes are highly successful, trusted, public health interventions. Genomic sequencing offers the opportunity to increase the benefits of NBS by screening infants for a greater number and variety of childhood-onset conditions. This study aimed to describe who needs to do what, when, and for whom to deliver genomic newborn screening (gNBS) and capture perceived implementation barriers and enablers. 'Key informants' (individuals involved in the delivery of NBS) were interviewed. The Actor, Action, Context, Time and Target framework guided data collection and analysis. Participants (N = 20) identified new Actions required to deliver gNBS (educating healthcare providers, longitudinal psychosocial support), NBS Actions needing modification (obtaining consent) and NBS Actions that could be adopted for gNBS (prompt referral pathways). Obtaining consent in a prenatal Context was a source of some disagreement. The Time to disclose high chance results was raised as a key consideration in gNBS programme design. Genetic counsellors were identified as key Actors in results management, but workforce limitations may be a barrier. Online decision support tools were an enabler to offering gNBS. The implementation of gNBS will require behaviour changes from HCPs delivering NBS. Findings can inform how to deliver gNBS at population-scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Tutty
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alison D Archibald
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lilian Downie
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- WEHI, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Sebastian Lunke
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Krishnamoorthy S, Mathieu S, Armstrong G, Ross V, Francis J, Reifels L, Kõlves K. Implementation of Complex Suicide Prevention Interventions: Insights into Barriers, Facilitators and Lessons Learned. Arch Suicide Res 2024:1-24. [PMID: 38900080 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2368127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Effective suicide prevention interventions are infrequently translated into practice and policy. One way to bridge this gap is to understand the influence of theoretical determinants on intervention delivery, adoption, and sustainment and lessons learned. This study aimed to examine barriers, facilitators and lessons learned from implementing complex suicide prevention interventions across the world. METHODS AND MATERIALS This study was a secondary analysis of a systematic review of complex suicide prevention interventions, following updated PRISMA guidelines. English published records and grey literature between 1990 and 2022 were searched on PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest, SCOPUS and CENTRAL. Related reports were organized into clusters. Data was extracted from clusters of reports on interventions and were mapped using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS The most frequently-reported barriers were reported within the intervention setting and were related to the perceived appropriateness of interventions within settings; shared norms, beliefs; and maintaining formal and informal networks and connections. The most frequently reported facilitators concerned individuals' motivation, capability/capacity, and felt need. Lessons learned focused on the importance of tailoring the intervention, responding to contextual needs and the importance of community engagement throughout the process. CONCLUSION This study emphasizes the importance of documenting and analyzing important influences on implementation. The complex interplay between the contextual determinants and implementation is discussed. These findings contribute to a better understanding of barriers and facilitators salient for implementation of complex suicide prevention interventions.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ayivi-Vinz G, Tremblay M, Gadio S, Dofara SG, Daniel SJ, Talbot D, Légaré F. Impact of Educational Activity Formats, Online or In-Person, on the Intention of Medical Specialists to Adopt a Clinical Behaviour: A Comparative Study. JOURNAL OF CME 2024; 13:2363550. [PMID: 38873619 PMCID: PMC11172255 DOI: 10.1080/28338073.2024.2363550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
COVID-19 accelerated continuing professional development (CPD) delivered online. We aimed to compare the impact of in-person versus online CPD courses on medical specialists' behavioural intentions and subsequent behaviour. In this comparative before-and-after study, medical specialists attended in-person courses on nine clinical topics. A second group attended an adapted online version of these courses. Behavioural intention and its psychosocial determinants were measured before and immediately after the courses. Behaviour change was measured six months later. Generalised estimating equation (GEE) models were used to compare the impact of course formats. A total of 82/206 in-person registrants (mean age: 52±10 years; 50% men) and 318/506 on-line registrants (mean age: 49±12 years; men: 63%) participated. Mean intention before in-person courses was 5.99±1.31 and 6.43±0.80 afterwards (average intention gain 0.44, CI: 0.16-0.74; p=0.003); mean intention before online courses was 5.53±1.62 and 5.98±1.40 afterwards (average intention gain of 0.45, CI: 0.30-0.58; p<0.0001). Difference in intention gain between groups was not statistically significant. Behaviour reported six months later was not significantly associated with post-course intention in either group. However, the intention difference increased significantly among those who said they had adopted the targeted behaviour (paired wilcoxon test: n = 40 and p-value=0.002) while it did not increase significantly in the group of those who had not adopted a targeted behaviour (paired wilcoxon test: n = 16 and p-value=0.223). In conclusion, the increase in intention of specialists after CPD courses was similar whether the course was in-person or online. Also, an increase in intention in both groups signalled more likelihood of adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Ayivi-Vinz
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Canada
| | - Martin Tremblay
- Direction du Développement Professionnel Continu, Fédération des Médecins Spécialistes du Québec, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Souleymane Gadio
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Canada
| | - Suélène Georgina Dofara
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sam J Daniel
- Direction du Développement Professionnel Continu, Fédération des Médecins Spécialistes du Québec, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Denis Talbot
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier, Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier, Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Crocker J, Ogutu EA, Snyder J, Freeman MC. The state of reporting context and implementation in peer-reviewed evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions: A scoping review. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2024; 259:114363. [PMID: 38604106 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To accurately assess evidence from environmental and public health field trials, context and implementation details of the intervention must be weighed with trial results; yet these details are under and inconsistently reported for water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), limiting the external validity of the evidence. METHODS To quantify the level of reporting of context and implementation in WASH evaluations, we conducted a scoping review of the 40 most cited evaluations of WASH interventions published in the last 10 years (2012-2022). We applied criteria derived from a review of existing reporting guidance from other sectors including healthcare and implementation science. We subsequently reviewed main articles, supplements, protocols, and other associated resources to assess thoroughness of context and implementation reporting. RESULTS Of the final 25 reporting items we searched for, four-intervention name, approach, location, and temporality-were reported by all studies. Five items-theory, implementer qualifications, dose intensity, targeting, and measured fidelity-were not reported in over a third of reviewed articles. Only two studies (5%) reported all items in our checklist. Only 74% of items were found in the main article, while the rest were found in separate papers (7%) or not at all (19%). DISCUSSION Inconsistent reporting of WASH implementation illustrates a major challenge in the sector. It is difficult to know what interventions are actually being evaluated and how to compare evaluation results. This inconsistent and incomplete implementation reporting limits the ability of programmers and policy makers to apply the available evidence to their contexts. Standardized reporting guidelines would improve the application of the evidence for WASH field evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonny Crocker
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
| | - Emily A Ogutu
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jedidiah Snyder
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew C Freeman
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sykes M, Rosenberg-Yunger ZRS, Quigley M, Gupta L, Thomas O, Robinson L, Caulfield K, Ivers N, Alderson S. Exploring the content and delivery of feedback facilitation co-interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2024; 19:37. [PMID: 38807219 PMCID: PMC11134935 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01365-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policymakers and researchers recommend supporting the capabilities of feedback recipients to increase the quality of care. There are different ways to support capabilities. We aimed to describe the content and delivery of feedback facilitation interventions delivered alongside audit and feedback within randomised controlled trials. METHODS We included papers describing feedback facilitation identified by the latest Cochrane review of audit and feedback. The piloted extraction proforma was based upon a framework to describe intervention content, with additional prompts relating to the identification of influences, selection of improvement actions and consideration of priorities and implications. We describe the content and delivery graphically, statistically and narratively. RESULTS We reviewed 146 papers describing 104 feedback facilitation interventions. Across included studies, feedback facilitation contained 26 different implementation strategies. There was a median of three implementation strategies per intervention and evidence that the number of strategies per intervention is increasing. Theory was used in 35 trials, although the precise role of theory was poorly described. Ten studies provided a logic model and six of these described their mechanisms of action. Both the exploration of influences and the selection of improvement actions were described in 46 of the feedback facilitation interventions; we describe who undertook this tailoring work. Exploring dose, there was large variation in duration (15-1800 min), frequency (1 to 42 times) and number of recipients per site (1 to 135). There were important gaps in reporting, but some evidence that reporting is improving over time. CONCLUSIONS Heterogeneity in the design of feedback facilitation needs to be considered when assessing the intervention's effectiveness. We describe explicit feedback facilitation choices for future intervention developers based upon choices made to date. We found the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change to be valuable when describing intervention components, with the potential for some minor clarifications in terms and for greater specificity by intervention providers. Reporting demonstrated extensive gaps which hinder both replication and learning. Feedback facilitation providers are recommended to close reporting gaps that hinder replication. Future work should seek to address the 'opportunity' for improvement activity, defined as factors that lie outside the individual that make care or improvement behaviour possible. REVIEW REGISTRATION The study protocol was published at: https://www.protocols.io/private/4DA5DE33B68E11ED9EF70A58A9FEAC02 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Lisa Robinson
- Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Karen Caulfield
- Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ward MJ, Matheny ME, Rubenstein MD, Bonnet K, Dagostino C, Schlundt DG, Anders S, Reese T, Mixon AS. Determinants of appropriate antibiotic and NSAID prescribing in unscheduled outpatient settings in the veterans health administration. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:640. [PMID: 38760660 PMCID: PMC11102113 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11082-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite efforts to enhance the quality of medication prescribing in outpatient settings, potentially inappropriate prescribing remains common, particularly in unscheduled settings where patients can present with infectious and pain-related complaints. Two of the most commonly prescribed medication classes in outpatient settings with frequent rates of potentially inappropriate prescribing include antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In the setting of persistent inappropriate prescribing, we sought to understand a diverse set of perspectives on the determinants of inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics and NSAIDs in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Theory of Planned Behavior. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians, stakeholders, and Veterans from March 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 within the Veteran Affairs Health System in unscheduled outpatient settings at the Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. Stakeholders included clinical operations leadership and methodological experts. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and de-identified. Data coding and analysis were conducted by experienced qualitative methodologists adhering to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies guidelines. Analysis was conducted using an iterative inductive/deductive process. RESULTS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 66 participants: clinicians (N = 25), stakeholders (N = 24), and Veterans (N = 17). We identified six themes contributing to potentially inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics and NSAIDs: 1) Perceived versus actual Veterans expectations about prescribing; 2) the influence of a time-pressured clinical environment on prescribing stewardship; 3) Limited clinician knowledge, awareness, and willingness to use evidence-based care; 4) Prescriber uncertainties about the Veteran condition at the time of the clinical encounter; 5) Limited communication; and 6) Technology barriers of the electronic health record and patient portal. CONCLUSIONS The diverse perspectives on prescribing underscore the need for interventions that recognize the detrimental impact of high workload on prescribing stewardship and the need to design interventions with the end-user in mind. This study revealed actionable themes that could be addressed to improve guideline concordant prescribing to enhance the quality of prescribing and to reduce patient harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Ward
- Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA , Geriatric Research, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, 2525 West End Avenue, Ste. 1430, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
- Medicine Service, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA.
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Michael E Matheny
- Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA , Geriatric Research, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, 2525 West End Avenue, Ste. 1430, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Melissa D Rubenstein
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kemberlee Bonnet
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Chloe Dagostino
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - David G Schlundt
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Shilo Anders
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Thomas Reese
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Amanda S Mixon
- Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA , Geriatric Research, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, 2525 West End Avenue, Ste. 1430, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Langford BJ, Bailey P, Livorsi DJ, Brown KA, Advani SD, Dodds Ashley E, Bearman G, Nori P. Five steps to high quality antimicrobial stewardship research. ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP & HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY : ASHE 2024; 4:e82. [PMID: 38751942 PMCID: PMC11094375 DOI: 10.1017/ash.2024.73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
The escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) necessitates impactful, reproducible, and scalable antimicrobial stewardship strategies. This review addresses the critical need to enhance the quality of antimicrobial stewardship intervention research. We propose five considerations for authors planning and evaluating antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Antimicrobial stewards should consider the following mnemonic ABCDE: (A) plan Ahead using implementation science; (B) Be clear and thoroughly describe the intervention by using the TidIER checklist; (C) Use a Checklist to comprehensively report study components; (D) Select a study Design carefully; and (E) Assess Effectiveness and implementation by selecting meaningful outcomes. Incorporating these recommendations will help strengthen the evidence base of antimicrobial stewardship literature and support optimal implementation of strategies to mitigate AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J. Langford
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Daniel J. Livorsi
- Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kevin A. Brown
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Elizabeth Dodds Ashley
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gonzalo Bearman
- Healthcare Infection Prevention Program, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Priya Nori
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yoong SL, Brown AD, Leung GKW, Hillenaar M, David JL, Hayward J, Strugnell C, Bell C, Brown V, Jackson M, Allender S. A protocol of a pilot randomised trial (Action-RESPOND) to support rural and regional communities with implementing community-based systems thinking obesity prevention initiatives. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302047. [PMID: 38696541 PMCID: PMC11065269 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over a quarter of children aged 2-17 years living in Australia are overweight or obese, with a higher prevalence reported in regional and remote communities. Systems thinking approaches that seek to support communities to generate and implement locally appropriate solutions targeting intertwined environmental, political, sociocultural, and individual determinants of obesity have the potential to ameliorate this. There have however been reported challenges with implementation of such initiatives, which may be strengthened by incorporating implementation science methods. METHODS This pilot randomised controlled trial protocol outlines the development and proposed evaluation of a multicomponent implementation strategy (Action-RESPOND). to increase the implementation of community-based systems thinking child obesity prevention initiatives The target of this intervention is ten rural and regional communities (or local government areas as the unit of allocation) within Northeast Victoria who were participants in a whole-of-systems intervention (RESPOND). Action-RESPOND builds on this intervention by assessing the impact of offering additional implementation strategies to five communities relative to usual care. The development of the multicomponent implementation strategy was informed by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework and consists of seven implementation strategies primarily delivered via 'facilitation' methods. Implementation strategies aimed to ensure initiatives implemented are i) evidence-based, ii) address community's specific needs and iii) are suitable for local context. Strategies also aimed to increase the community's capacity to implement, through iv) improving the health promotion team's implementation knowledge and skills, fostering v) leadership, vi) physical resources and vii) community culture to drive implementation. The feasibility, acceptability, potential impact, and cost of the strategy will be assessed at baseline and follow up using surveys administered to key representatives within the community and internal records maintained by the research team. DISCUSSION By leveraging an existing community-based whole-of-systems intervention, Action-RESPOND offers a unique opportunity to collect pilot feasibility and early empirical data on how to apply implementation and systems science approaches to support obesity prevention in rural and regional communities in Victoria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sze Lin Yoong
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew D. Brown
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Gloria K. W. Leung
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Monique Hillenaar
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Jennifer L. David
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Josh Hayward
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Claudia Strugnell
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Phaysical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Colin Bell
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Vicki Brown
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Michelle Jackson
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Steven Allender
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nichol B, Kemp E, Wilson R, Rodrigues AM, Hesselgreaves H, Robson C, Haighton C. Establishing an updated consensus on the conceptual and operational definitions of Making Every Contact Count (MECC) across experts within research and practice: an international Delphi Study. Public Health 2024; 230:29-37. [PMID: 38484623 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Making Every Contact Count (MECC) initiative is broadly defined as an opportunistic approach to prevention by making use of the thousands of conversations service providers have with service users every day. However, since its conception, the application of MECC has diverged and developed considerably. Thus, the current study aimed to revise the definition according to current research and practice to better describe what is and is not included. STUDY DESIGN A consensus building classic Delphi methodology, completed by an expert panel. METHODS Round 1 asked open questions around the definition of MECC. Content analysis of round 1 identified statements that were rated for agreement in round 2. Statements achieving ≥80% agreement were included in a short, long, or operational definition of MECC that were rated for agreement in round 3 (the minimum number required). An agreement of ≥80% indicated consensus. RESULTS Forty out of 100 contacted experts completed three rounds. Experts in practice and research were recruited internationally although most were from England. From round 1, 274 statements were generated, of which 96 achieved consensus and were included within round 3. The short and long definition received consensus in round 3, the operational definition required four rounds to reach consensus. CONCLUSIONS MECC is a person-centred approach to health behaviour change that, provided an individual possesses the relevant skills, can be delivered by anyone and anywhere. The distinguishing feature of MECC is not in its duration, target behaviour, or conditions for delivery, but rather in the approach taken and the mechanisms applied to conversations. Implications for research and practice are discussed, and the limits for applicability acknowledged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Nichol
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
| | - E Kemp
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - R Wilson
- Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - A M Rodrigues
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - H Hesselgreaves
- Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - C Robson
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - C Haighton
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ghanmi N, Bondok M, Etherington C, Saddiki Y, Lefebvre I, Berthelot P, Dion PM, Raymond B, Seguin J, Sekhavati P, Islam S, Boet S. Optimizing Teamwork in the Operating Room: A Scoping Review of Actionable Teamwork Strategies. Cureus 2024; 16:e60522. [PMID: 38883070 PMCID: PMC11180536 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Suboptimal teamwork in the operating room (OR) is a contributing factor in a significant proportion of preventable complications for surgical patients. Specifying behaviour is fundamental to closing evidence-practice gaps in healthcare. Current teamwork interventions, however, have yet to be synthesized in this way. This scoping review aimed to identify actionable strategies for use during surgery by mapping the existing literature according to the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework. The databases MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Embase, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Cochrane, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to April 5, 2022. Screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate by pairs of independent reviewers. The search identified 9,289 references after the removal of duplicates. Across 249 studies deemed eligible for inclusion, eight types of teamwork interventions could be mapped according to the AACTT framework: bundle/checklists, protocols, audit and feedback, clinical practice guidelines, environmental change, cognitive aid, education, and other), yet many were ambiguous regarding the actors and actions involved. The 101 included protocol interventions appeared to be among the most actionable for the OR based on the clear specification of ACCTT elements, and their effectiveness should be evaluated and compared in future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nibras Ghanmi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN
| | - Mostafa Bondok
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, CAN
| | - Cole Etherington
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, CAN
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeanne Seguin
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN
| | | | - Sindeed Islam
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN
| | - Sylvain Boet
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hodson N, Powell BJ, Nilsen P, Beidas RS. How can a behavioral economics lens contribute to implementation science? Implement Sci 2024; 19:33. [PMID: 38671508 PMCID: PMC11046816 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01362-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation science in health is an interdisciplinary field with an emphasis on supporting behavior change required when clinicians and other actors implement evidence-based practices within organizational constraints. Behavioral economics has emerged in parallel and works towards developing realistic models of how humans behave and categorizes a wide range of features of choices that can influence behavior. We argue that implementation science can be enhanced by the incorporation of approaches from behavioral economics. Main body First, we provide a general overview of implementation science and ways in which implementation science has been limited to date. Second, we review principles of behavioral economics and describe how concepts from BE have been successfully applied to healthcare including nudges deployed in the electronic health record. For example, de-implementation of low-value prescribing has been supported by changing the default in the electronic health record. We then describe what a behavioral economics lens offers to existing implementation science theories, models and frameworks, including rich and realistic models of human behavior, additional research methods such as pre-mortems and behavioral design, and low-cost and scalable implementation strategies. We argue that insights from behavioral economics can guide the design of implementation strategies and the interpretation of implementation studies. Key objections to incorporating behavioral economics are addressed, including concerns about sustainment and at what level the strategies work. CONCLUSION Scholars should consider augmenting implementation science theories, models, and frameworks with relevant insights from behavioral economics. By drawing on these additional insights, implementation scientists have the potential to boost efforts to expand the provision and availability of high quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Hodson
- Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
- Warwick Medical School, Unit of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, Chicago, USA.
| | - Byron J Powell
- Brown School, Center for Mental Health Services Research, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
- Center for Dissemination & Implementation, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
| | - Per Nilsen
- Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Rinad S Beidas
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Skolarus TA, Hawley ST, Forman J, Sales AE, Sparks JB, Metreger T, Burns J, Caram MV, Radhakrishnan A, Dossett LA, Makarov DV, Leppert JT, Shelton JB, Stensland KD, Dunsmore J, Maclennan S, Saini S, Hollenbeck BK, Shahinian V, Wittmann DA, Deolankar V, Sriram S. Unpacking overuse of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer to inform de-implementation strategies. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:37. [PMID: 38594740 PMCID: PMC11005280 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00576-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many men with prostate cancer will be exposed to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). While evidence-based ADT use is common, ADT is also used in cases with no or limited evidence resulting in more harm than benefit, i.e., overuse. Since there are risks of ADT (e.g., diabetes, osteoporosis), it is important to understand the behaviors facilitating overuse to inform de-implementation strategies. For these reasons, we conducted a theory-informed survey study, including a discrete choice experiment (DCE), to better understand ADT overuse and provider preferences for mitigating overuse. METHODS Our survey used the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework, the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) Model, and a DCE to elicit provider de-implementation strategy preferences. We surveyed the Society of Government Service Urologists listserv in December 2020. We stratified respondents based on the likelihood of stopping overuse as ADT monotherapy for localized prostate cancer ("yes"/"probably yes," "probably no"/"no"), and characterized corresponding Likert scale responses to seven COM-B statements. We used multivariable regression to identify associations between stopping ADT overuse and COM-B responses. RESULTS Our survey was completed by 84 respondents (13% response rate), with 27% indicating "probably no"/"no" to stopping ADT overuse. We found differences across respondents who said they would and would not stop ADT overuse in demographics and COM-B statements. Our model identified 2 COM-B domains (Opportunity-Social, Motivation-Reflective) significantly associated with a lower likelihood of stopping ADT overuse. Our DCE demonstrated in-person communication, multidisciplinary review, and medical record documentation may be effective in reducing ADT overuse. CONCLUSIONS Our study used a behavioral theory-informed survey, including a DCE, to identify behaviors and context underpinning ADT overuse. Specifying behaviors supporting and gathering provider preferences in addressing ADT overuse requires a stepwise, stakeholder-engaged approach to support evidence-based cancer care. From this work, we are pursuing targeted improvement strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03579680.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ted A Skolarus
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Urology, Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jane Forman
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Anne E Sales
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Sinclair School of Nursing and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Jordan B Sparks
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tabitha Metreger
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer Burns
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Megan V Caram
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Archana Radhakrishnan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Danil V Makarov
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System and NYU School of Medicine Departments of Urology and Population Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - John T Leppert
- Surgical Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jeremy B Shelton
- VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kristian D Stensland
- Department of Urology, Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer Dunsmore
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Steven Maclennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Sameer Saini
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Vahakn Shahinian
- Department of Urology, Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniela A Wittmann
- Department of Urology, Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Varad Deolankar
- Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - S Sriram
- Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lunke S, Bouffler SE, Downie L, Caruana J, Amor DJ, Archibald A, Bombard Y, Christodoulou J, Clausen M, De Fazio P, Greaves RF, Hollizeck S, Kanga-Parabia A, Lang N, Lynch F, Peters R, Sadedin S, Tutty E, Eggers S, Lee C, Wall M, Yeung A, Gaff C, Gyngell C, Vears DF, Best S, Goranitis I, Stark Z. Prospective cohort study of genomic newborn screening: BabyScreen+ pilot study protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081426. [PMID: 38569677 PMCID: PMC11146401 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is a highly successful public health programme that uses biochemical and other assays to screen for severe but treatable childhood-onset conditions. Introducing genomic sequencing into NBS programmes increases the range of detectable conditions but raises practical and ethical issues. Evidence from prospectively ascertained cohorts is required to guide policy and future implementation. This study aims to develop, implement and evaluate a genomic NBS (gNBS) pilot programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The BabyScreen+ study will pilot gNBS in three phases. In the preimplementation phase, study materials, including education resources, decision support and data collection tools, will be designed. Focus groups and key informant interviews will also be undertaken to inform delivery of the study and future gNBS programmes. During the implementation phase, we will prospectively recruit birth parents in Victoria, Australia, to screen 1000 newborns for over 600 severe, treatable, childhood-onset conditions. Clinically accredited whole genome sequencing will be performed following standard NBS using the same sample. High chance results will be returned by genetic healthcare professionals, with follow-on genetic and other confirmatory testing and referral to specialist services as required. The postimplementation phase will evaluate the feasibility of gNBS as the primary aim, and assess ethical, implementation, psychosocial and health economic factors to inform future service delivery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This project received ethics approval from the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne Research Ethics Committee: HREC/91500/RCHM-2023, HREC/90929/RCHM-2022 and HREC/91392/RCHM-2022. Findings will be disseminated to policy-makers, and through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Lunke
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sophie E Bouffler
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lilian Downie
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jade Caruana
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Archibald
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Christodoulou
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marc Clausen
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul De Fazio
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ronda F Greaves
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sebastian Hollizeck
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anaita Kanga-Parabia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nitzan Lang
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fiona Lynch
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Simon Sadedin
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Erin Tutty
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stefanie Eggers
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Crystle Lee
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Meaghan Wall
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Yeung
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shuldiner J, Lam E, Shah N, Grimshaw J, Desveaux L, Heisey R, Taccone MS, Taljaard M, Thavorn K, Hodgson D, Gupta S, Lofters A, Ivers N, Nathan PC. Protocol for the ONLOOP trial: pragmatic randomized trial evaluating a province-wide system of personalized reminders for evidence-based surveillance tests in adult survivors of childhood cancer in Ontario. Implement Sci 2024; 19:19. [PMID: 38395903 PMCID: PMC10885391 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01347-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood cancer treatment while often curative, leads to elevated risks of morbidity and mortality. Survivors require lifelong periodic surveillance for late effects of treatment, yet adherence to guideline-recommended tests is suboptimal. We created ONLOOP to provide adult survivors of childhood cancer with detailed health information, including summaries of their childhood cancer treatment and recommended surveillance tests for early detection of cardiomyopathy, breast cancer, and/or colorectal cancer, with personalized reminders over time. METHODS This is an individually randomized, registry-based pragmatic trial with an embedded process and economic evaluation to understand ONLOOP's impact and whether it can be readily implemented at scale. All adult survivors of childhood cancer in Ontario overdue for guideline-recommended tests will be randomly assigned to one of two arms: (1) intervention or (2) delayed intervention. A letter of information and invitation will detail the ONLOOP program. Those who sign up will receive a personalized toolkit and a screening reminder 6 months later. With the participants' consent, ONLOOP will also send their primary care clinician a letter detailing the recommended tests and a reminder 6 months later. The primary outcome will be the proportion of survivors who complete one or more of the guideline-recommended cardiac, breast, or colon surveillance tests during the 12 months after randomization. Data will be obtained from administrative databases. The intent-to-treat principle will be followed. Based on our analyses of administrative data, we anticipate allocating at least 862 individuals to each trial arm, providing 90% power to detect an absolute increase of 6% in targeted surveillance tests completed. We will interview childhood cancer survivors and family physicians in an embedded process evaluation to examine why and how ONLOOP achieved success or failed. A cost-effectiveness evaluation will be performed. DISCUSSION The results of this study will determine if ONLOOP is effective at helping adult survivors of childhood cancer complete their recommended surveillance tests. This study will also inform ongoing provincial programs for this high-risk population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05832138.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Shuldiner
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
| | - Emily Lam
- The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Nida Shah
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Jeremy Grimshaw
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Room 1286, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Laura Desveaux
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, 100 Queensway West, Mississauga, ON, L5B, Canada
| | - Ruth Heisey
- Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Michael S Taccone
- The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health-University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology-Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Kednapa Thavorn
- Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - David Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sumit Gupta
- The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Noah Ivers
- Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Paul C Nathan
- The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Muriithi FG, Banke-Thomas A, Forbes G, Gakuo RW, Thomas E, Gallos ID, Devall A, Coomarasamy A, Lorencatto F. A systematic review of behaviour change interventions to improve maternal health outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0002950. [PMID: 38377077 PMCID: PMC10878526 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
The rate of decline in the global burden of avoidable maternal deaths has stagnated and remains an issue of concern in many sub-Saharan Africa countries. As per the most recent evidence, an average maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 223 deaths per 100,000 live births has been estimated globally, with sub-Saharan Africa's average MMR at 536 per 100,000 live births-more than twice the global average. Despite the high MMR, there is variation in MMR between and within sub-Saharan Africa countries. Differences in the behaviour of those accessing and/or delivering maternal healthcare may explain variations in outcomes and provide a basis for quality improvement in health systems. There is a gap in describing the landscape of interventions aimed at modifying the behaviours of those accessing and delivering maternal healthcare for improving maternal health outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa. Our objective was to extract and synthesise the target behaviours, component behaviour change strategies and outcomes of behaviour change interventions for improving maternal health outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Our protocol was published a priori on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022315130). We searched ten electronic databases (PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL PLUS, African Index Medicus, African Journals Online, and Web of Science) and included randomised trials and quasi-experimental studies. We extracted target behaviours and specified the behavioural interventions using the Action, Actor, Context, Time, and Target (AACTT) framework. We categorised the behaviour change strategies using the intervention functions described in the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). We reviewed 52 articles (26 randomized trials and 26 quasi-experimental studies). They had a mixed risk of bias. Out of these, 41 studies (78.8%) targeted behaviour change of those accessing maternal healthcare services, while seven studies (13.5%) focused on those delivering maternal healthcare. Four studies (7.7%) targeted mixed stakeholder groups. The studies employed a range of behaviour change strategies, including education 37 (33.3%), persuasion 20 (18%), training 19 (17.1%), enablement 16 (14.4%), environmental restructuring 8 (7.2%), modelling 6 (5.4%) and incentivisation 5 (4.5%). No studies used restriction or coercion strategies. Education was the most common strategy for changing the behaviour of those accessing maternal healthcare, while training was the most common strategy in studies targeting the behaviour of those delivering maternal healthcare. Of the 52 studies, 40 reported effective interventions, 7 were ineffective, and 5 were equivocal. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to methodological and clinical heterogeneity across the studies. In conclusion, there is evidence of effective behaviour change interventions targeted at those accessing and/or delivering maternal healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa. However, more focus should be placed on behaviour change by those delivering maternal healthcare within the health facilities to fast-track the reduction of the huge burden of avoidable maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis G. Muriithi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women’s Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- School of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, Greenwich, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Forbes
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth W. Gakuo
- Department of Nursing, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Lenton, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor Thomas
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women’s Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ioannis D. Gallos
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women’s Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Adam Devall
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women’s Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women’s Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Fabiana Lorencatto
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Klasnja P, Meza RD, Pullmann MD, Mettert KD, Hawkes R, Palazzo L, Weiner BJ, Lewis CC. Getting cozy with causality: Advances to the causal pathway diagramming method to enhance implementation precision. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2024; 5:26334895241248851. [PMID: 38694167 PMCID: PMC11062231 DOI: 10.1177/26334895241248851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation strategies are theorized to work well when carefully matched to implementation determinants and when factors-preconditions, moderators, etc.-that influence strategy effectiveness are prospectively identified and addressed. Existing methods for strategy selection are either imprecise or require significant technical expertise and resources, undermining their utility. This article outlines refinements to causal pathway diagrams (CPDs), a method for articulating the causal process through which implementation strategies work and offers illustrations of their use. Method CPDs are a visualization tool to represent an implementation strategy, its mechanism(s) (i.e., the processes through which a strategy is thought to operate), determinants it is intended to address, factors that may impede or facilitate its effectiveness, and the series of outcomes that should be expected if the strategy is operating as intended. We offer principles for constructing CPDs and describe their key functions. Results Applications of the CPD method by study teams from two National Institute of Health-funded Implementation Science Centers and a research grant are presented. These include the use of CPDs to (a) match implementation strategies to determinants, (b) understand the conditions under which an implementation strategy works, and (c) develop causal theories of implementation strategies. Conclusions CPDs offer a novel method for implementers to select, understand, and improve the effectiveness of implementation strategies. They make explicit theoretical assumptions about strategy operation while supporting practical planning. Early applications have led to method refinements and guidance for the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Predrag Klasnja
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rosemary D. Meza
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael D. Pullmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kayne D. Mettert
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rene Hawkes
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lorella Palazzo
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bryan J. Weiner
- Hans Rosling Center Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA
| | - Cara C. Lewis
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vasiliou VS, Philia I, Drosatou C, Mitsi E, Tsakonas I. LeadinCare: A Qualitative Informed Digital Training Platform Development to Increase Physicians' Soft Communication Skills After COVID-19. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2024; 29:39-54. [PMID: 37131299 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2023.2206144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
The post-COVID-19 pandemic era has placed new demands on physicians. One of these demands is the need to use targeted knowledge and soft communication skills, to address the psychosocial problems (e.g. vaccine hesitancy, fears) of individuals with Chronic Physical Illnesses (CPIs). Focusing on training physicians in targeted soft communication skills can help health care systems to address psychosocial-type problems. Yet, such training programs are rarely implemented, effectively.This study aimed to (a) understand physicians' implementation challenges when using soft communication skills during the COVID-19 pandemic; (b) identify beliefs, barriers, and facilitators that can influence physicians' behaviours to use soft communication skills; and (c) inform the content of the LeadinCare; a new digital training platform, designed to improve physicians' soft communication skills, by leveraging the TDF Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF).We conducted 14 in-depth semi-structured interviews with physicians in Greece, supporting non-COVID-19 cases with CPIs. We analyzed their data using inductive and deductive approaches.Physicians highlighted time, inability to see patients in person, absence of space for non-COVID-19 cases, and poor organizational procedures as barriers to using soft communication skills. Five TDF domains (beliefs) were identified as the most salient to inform the LeadinCare platform: (1) practical and well-organized knowledge; (2) skills that support patients and their relatives; (3) physicians' beliefs about capabilities to use the skills; (4) beliefs about consequences of using the skills (job satisfaction); and (5) the use of digital, interactive, and on-demand platforms (environmental context & resources). We mapped the domains in six narrative-based practices that informed the content of the LeadinCare.Physicians need skills that go beyond talking and towards cultivating resilience and flexibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilis S Vasiliou
- Postdoctoral Research Associate in Clinical and Health Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Clinical Psychologist & Postdoctoral Mixed Methods Research Associate, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Issari Philia
- Department of Psychology, Laboratory for Qualitative Research in Psychology and Psychosocial Well-Being, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens Greece
| | - Constantina Drosatou
- Department of Psychology, Laboratory for Qualitative Research in Psychology and Psychosocial Well-Being, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens Greece
| | - Efi Mitsi
- Department of Psychology, Laboratory for Qualitative Research in Psychology and Psychosocial Well-Being, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Siqueira do Prado L, Allemann S, Viprey M, Schott AM, Dediu D, Dima AL. Toward an Interdisciplinary Approach to Constructing Care Delivery Pathways From Electronic Health Care Databases to Support Integrated Care in Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review of Quantification and Visualization Methods. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e49996. [PMID: 38096009 PMCID: PMC10755664 DOI: 10.2196/49996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health care databases are increasingly used for informing clinical decision-making. In long-term care, linking and accessing information on health care delivered by different providers could improve coordination and health outcomes. Several methods for quantifying and visualizing this information into data-driven care delivery pathways (CDPs) have been proposed. To be integrated effectively and sustainably into routine care, these methods need to meet a range of prerequisites covering 3 broad domains: clinical, technological, and behavioral. Although advances have been made, development to date lacks a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach. As the field expands, it would benefit from developing common standards of development and reporting that integrate clinical, technological, and behavioral aspects. OBJECTIVE We aimed to describe the content and development of long-term CDP quantification and visualization methods and to propose recommendations for future work. METHODS We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations. We searched peer-reviewed publications in English and reported the CDP methods by using the following data in the included studies: long-term care data and extracted data on clinical information and aims, technological development and characteristics, and user behaviors. The data are summarized in tables and presented narratively. RESULTS Of the 2921 records identified, 14 studies were included, of which 13 (93%) were descriptive reports and 1 (7%) was a validation study. Clinical aims focused primarily on treatment decision-making (n=6, 43%) and care coordination (n=7, 50%). Technological development followed a similar process from scope definition to tool validation, with various levels of detail in reporting. User behaviors (n=3, 21%) referred to accessing CDPs, planning care, adjusting treatment, or supporting adherence. CONCLUSIONS The use of electronic health care databases for quantifying and visualizing CDPs in long-term care is an emerging field. Detailed and standardized reporting of clinical and technological aspects is needed. Early consideration of how CDPs would be used, validated, and implemented in clinical practice would likely facilitate further development and adoption. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019140494; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=140494. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033573.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiza Siqueira do Prado
- INSERM Unit U1290-Research on Healthcare Performance, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Samuel Allemann
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marie Viprey
- INSERM Unit U1290-Research on Healthcare Performance, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Pôle de Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Anne-Marie Schott
- INSERM Unit U1290-Research on Healthcare Performance, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Pôle de Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Dan Dediu
- Catalan Institute for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexandra Lelia Dima
- INSERM Unit U1290-Research on Healthcare Performance, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Crowe J, Edbrooke L, Khot A, Denehy L, Francis JJ. Enablers and barriers to referral and delivery of multidisciplinary prehabilitation in the autologous stem cell transplant population: a theory-based interview study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 32:25. [PMID: 38095731 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08234-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Health care professionals (HCP) play a vital role in effectiveness of prehabilitation programs, but information is limited about what assists HCP deliver an effective service. This study evaluated HCP perceptions of enablers and barriers to two behaviours: referral for, and delivery of, multidisciplinary prehabilitation prior to autologous stem cell transplant. METHODS Based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) of behaviour change, we conducted semi-structured interviews, purposively sampling 14 participants (from various healthcare disciplines) at a tertiary cancer centre. Discipline-specific topic guides were created based on the TDF and the behaviours appropriate to each discipline. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised, content analysed (grouping, then labelling, thematically similar responses), and classified into theoretical domains. Structured decision rules were used to classify themes as high, medium, or low priority. RESULTS Fifty enablers and 31 barriers were identified; of these 26 enablers and 16 barriers classified as high priority. Four domains had the most frequent high-priority enablers: Social professional role and identity (e.g. multidisciplinary teamwork); Beliefs about consequences (e.g. patient benefit); Memory, attention, and decision processes (e.g. refer as early as possible); and Environmental context and resources (e.g. electronic medical records are beneficial). High-priority barriers were most frequent in four domains: Memory, attention, and decision processes (e.g. conflicting views about who should be referred); Environmental context and resources (e.g. lack of time); Social influences (e.g. families); and Emotions (e.g. patient distress). CONCLUSION Participants reported more enablers than barriers. Findings can support delivery of prehabilitation programs in hospital settings where uptake remains low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Crowe
- Allied Health Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Lara Edbrooke
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amit Khot
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Linda Denehy
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jill J Francis
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sarkies M, Francis-Auton E, Long J, Roberts N, Westbrook J, Levesque JF, Watson DE, Hardwick R, Sutherland K, Disher G, Hibbert P, Braithwaite J. Audit and feedback to reduce unwarranted clinical variation at scale: a realist study of implementation strategy mechanisms. Implement Sci 2023; 18:71. [PMID: 38082301 PMCID: PMC10714549 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01324-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unwarranted clinical variation in hospital care includes the underuse, overuse, or misuse of services. Audit and feedback is a common strategy to reduce unwarranted variation, but its effectiveness varies widely across contexts. We aimed to identify implementation strategies, mechanisms, and contextual circumstances contributing to the impact of audit and feedback on unwarranted clinical variation. METHODS Realist study examining a state-wide value-based healthcare program implemented between 2017 and 2021 in New South Wales, Australia. Three initiatives within the program included audit and feedback to reduce unwarranted variation in inpatient care for different conditions. Multiple data sources were used to formulate the initial audit and feedback program theory: a systematic review, realist review, program document review, and informal discussions with key program stakeholders. Semi-structured interviews were then conducted with 56 participants to refute, refine, or confirm the initial program theories. Data were analysed retroductively using a context-mechanism-outcome framework for 11 transcripts which were coded into the audit and feedback program theory. The program theory was validated with three expert panels: senior health leaders (n = 19), Agency for Clinical Innovation (n = 11), and Ministry of Health (n = 21) staff. RESULTS The program's audit and feedback implementation strategy operated through eight mechanistic processes. The strategy worked well when clinicians (1) felt ownership and buy-in, (2) could make sense of the information provided, (3) were motivated by social influence, and (4) accepted responsibility and accountability for proposed changes. The success of the strategy was constrained when the audit process led to (5) rationalising current practice instead of creating a learning opportunity, (6) perceptions of unfairness and concerns about data integrity, 7) development of improvement plans that were not followed, and (8) perceived intrusions on professional autonomy. CONCLUSIONS Audit and feedback strategies may help reduce unwarranted clinical variation in care where there is engagement between auditors and local clinicians, meaningful audit indicators, clear improvement plans, and respect for clinical expertise. We contribute theoretical development for audit and feedback by proposing a Model for Audit and Feedback Implementation at Scale. Recommendations include limiting the number of audit indicators, involving clinical staff and local leaders in feedback, and providing opportunities for reflection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Sarkies
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Emilie Francis-Auton
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Janet Long
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Natalie Roberts
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Johanna Westbrook
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jean-Frederic Levesque
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
- NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, Sydney, Australia
| | - Diane E Watson
- Bureau of Health Information, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Hardwick
- Peninsula Medical School, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Allied Health and Human Performance, IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Murray DM, Heagerty P, Troendle J, Lin FC, Moyer J, Stevens J, Lytle L, Zhang X, Ilias M, Masterson MY, Redmond N, Tonwe V, Clark D, Mensah GA. Implementation Research at NHLBI: Methodological and Design Challenges and Lessons Learned from the DECIPHeR Initiative. Ethn Dis 2023; DECIPHeR:12-17. [PMID: 38846726 PMCID: PMC11099519 DOI: 10.18865/ed.decipher.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
NHLBI funded seven projects as part of the Disparities Elimination through Coordinated Interventions to Prevent and Control Heart and Lung Disease Risk (DECIPHeR) Initiative. They were expected to collaborate with community partners to (1) employ validated theoretical or conceptual implementation research frameworks, (2) include implementation research study designs, (3) include implementation measures as primary outcomes, and (4) inform our understanding of mediators and mechanisms of action of the implementation strategy. Several projects focused on late-stage implementation strategies that optimally and sustainably delivered two or more evidence-based multilevel interventions to reduce or eliminate cardiovascular and/or pulmonary health disparities and to improve population health in high-burden communities. Projects that were successful in the three-year planning phase transitioned to a 4-year execution phase. NHLBI formed a Technical Assistance Workgroup during the planning phase to help awardees refine study aims, strengthen research designs, detail analytic plans, and to use valid sample size methods. This paper highlights methodological and study design challenges encountered during this process. Important lessons learned included (1) the need for greater emphasis on implementation outcomes, (2) the need to clearly distinguish between intervention and implementation strategies in the protocol, (3) the need to address clustering due to randomization of groups or clusters, (4) the need to address the cross-classification that results when intervention agents work across multiple units of randomization in the same arm, (5) the need to accommodate time-varying intervention effects in stepped-wedge designs, and (6) the need for data-based estimates of the parameters required for sample size estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick Heagerty
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - James Troendle
- Office of Biostatistical Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Feng-Chang Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - June Stevens
- Departments of Nutrition and Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Leslie Lytle
- Departments of Health Behavior and Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Xinzhi Zhang
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Maliha Ilias
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mary Y. Masterson
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Nicole Redmond
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Veronica Tonwe
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Dave Clark
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - George A. Mensah
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mitra B, Archer D, Hurst J, Lycett D. The Role of Religion, Spirituality and Social Media in the Journey of Eating Disorders: A Qualitative Exploration of Participants in the "TastelifeUK" Eating Disorder Recovery Programme. JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND HEALTH 2023; 62:4451-4477. [PMID: 37423909 PMCID: PMC10682250 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-023-01861-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
This study explores the religious and spiritual aspects of eating disorder recovery and the role of social media in the context of a third sector community-based recovery group in the UK. Four online focus groups explored participant perspectives (17 participants in total) using thematic analysis. The qualitative findings highlight that relational support from God is important in eating disorder recovery and coping, although this can be challenged by spiritual struggles and tensions. Relational support from people is also relevant where it offers a place to share different experiences together giving a sense of community belonging. Social media was also found to be important in relation to eating disorders, either providing a community of support or exacerbating existing issues. This study suggests that the role of religion and social media should be acknowledged where it is important for that individual in relation to eating disorder recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Mitra
- Joint Head of English, Media and Culture, University of Worcester, City Campus, Worcester, WR1 3AS, UK.
| | | | - Joanne Hurst
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK
| | - Deborah Lycett
- Institute Director for Health & Wellbeing, Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mills Z, Wright K, D’Lima D. Applying the Behaviour Change Wheel to UK Local Authority Policy Documents: A Content Analysis in the Context of Financial Behaviour. Behav Sci (Basel) 2023; 13:991. [PMID: 38131848 PMCID: PMC10741065 DOI: 10.3390/bs13120991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Local authorities in the UK often try to improve their residents' financial well-being by promoting changes in behaviour. The extent to which these behaviour change activities are based on relevant theory or evidence is unknown. This research aims to retrospectively analyse the content of local authorities' policies to identify opportunities for improvement. The Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework was used to assess the specification of target behaviours. The Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) process was used to assess intervention content. Within the policy documents, target behaviours were not consistently specified in terms of the AACTT criteria. Descriptions of interventions lacked detail with 28% unable to be categorised and there was a reliance on Education (46%) to change financial behaviour. The designing and reporting of interventions to change residents' financial behaviour were not always aligned with behavioural science evidence and utilising systematic frameworks could help local authorities achieve policy objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Mills
- Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Van Deinse TB, Zielinski MJ, Holliday SB, Rudd BN, Crable EL. The application of implementation science methods in correctional health intervention research: a systematic review. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:149. [PMID: 38001546 PMCID: PMC10675852 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00521-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving access to high-quality healthcare for individuals in correctional settings is critical to advancing health equity in the United States. Compared to the general population, criminal-legal involved individuals experience higher rates of chronic health conditions and poorer health outcomes. Implementation science frameworks and strategies offer useful tools to integrate health interventions into criminal-legal settings and to improve care. A review of implementation science in criminal-legal settings to date is necessary to advance future applications. This systematic review summarizes research that has harnessed implementation science to promote the uptake of effective health interventions in adult criminal-legal settings. METHODS A systematic review of seven databases (Academic Search Premier, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, ProQuest Criminal Justice Database, ProQuest Sociological Abstracts, MEDLINE/PubMed) was conducted. Eligible studies used an implementation science framework to assess implementation outcomes, determinants, and/or implementation strategies in adult criminal-legal settings. Qualitative synthesis was used to extract and summarize settings, study designs, sample characteristics, methods, and application of implementation science methods. Implementation strategies were further analyzed using the Pragmatic Implementation Reporting Tool. RESULTS Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria. Studies implemented interventions to address infectious diseases (n=9), substance use (n=6), mental health (n=5), co-occurring substance use and mental health (n=2), or other health conditions (n=2). Studies varied in their operationalization and description of guiding implementation frameworks/taxonomies. Sixteen studies reported implementation determinants and 12 studies measured implementation outcomes, with acceptability (n=5), feasibility (n=3), and reach (n=2) commonly assessed. Six studies tested implementation strategies. Systematic review results were used to generate recommendations for improving implementation success in criminal-legal contexts. CONCLUSIONS The focus on implementation determinants in correctional health studies reflects the need to tailor implementation efforts to complex organizational and inter-agency contexts. Future studies should investigate policy factors that influence implementation success, design, and test implementation strategies tailored to determinants, and investigate a wider array of implementation outcomes relevant to criminal-legal settings, health interventions relevant to adult and juvenile populations, and health equity outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION A study protocol (CRD42020114111) was registered with Prospero.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonya B Van Deinse
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, USA.
| | - Melissa J Zielinski
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Psychiatric Research Institute, Little Rock, USA
| | | | | | - Erika L Crable
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kelly HT, Smith JJ, Verdonschot A, Kennedy SG, Scott JJ, McKay H, Nathan N, Sutherland R, Morgan PJ, Salmon J, Penney D, Boyer J, Lloyd RS, Oldmeadow C, Reeves P, Pursey K, Hua M, Longmore S, Norman J, Voukelatos A, Zask A, Lubans DR. Supporting adolescents' participation in muscle-strengthening physical activity: protocol for the 'Resistance Training for Teens' (RT4T) hybrid type III implementation-effectiveness trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075488. [PMID: 37914300 PMCID: PMC10626834 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In Australia, only 22% of male and 8% of female adolescents meet the muscle-strengthening physical activity guidelines, and few school-based interventions support participation in resistance training (RT). After promising findings from our effectiveness trial, we conducted a state-wide dissemination of the 'Resistance Training for Teens' (RT4T) intervention from 2015 to 2020. Despite high estimated reach, we found considerable variability in programme delivery and teachers reported numerous barriers to implementation. Supporting schools when they first adopt evidence-based programmes may strengthen programme fidelity, sustainability, and by extension, programme impact. However, the most effective implementation support model for RT4T is unclear. OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of three implementation support models on the reach (primary outcome), dose delivered, fidelity, sustainability, impact and cost of RT4T. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a hybrid type III implementation-effectiveness trial involving grade 9 and 10 (aged 14-16 years) students from 90 secondary schools in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Schools will be recruited across one cohort in 2023, stratified by school type, socioeconomic status and location, and randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive one of the following levels of implementation support: (1) 'low' (training and resources), (2) 'moderate' (training and resources+external support) or 'high' (training and resources+external support+equipment). Training includes a teacher workshop related to RT4T programme content (theory and practical sessions) and the related resources. Additional support will be provided by trained project officers from five local health districts. Equipment will consist of a pack of semiportable RT equipment (ie, weighted bars, dumbbells, resistance bands and inverted pull up bar stands) valued at ~$A1000 per school. Study outcomes will be assessed at baseline (T0), 6 months (T1) and 18 months (T2). A range of quantitative (teacher logs, observations and teacher surveys) and qualitative (semistructured interviews with teachers) methods will be used to assess primary (reach) and secondary outcomes (dose delivered, fidelity, sustainability, impact and cost of RT4T). Quantitative analyses will use logistic mixed models for dichotomous outcomes, and ordinal or linear mixed effects regression models for continuous outcomes, with alpha levels set at p<0.025 for the outcomes and cost comparisons of the moderate and high support arms against the low support arm. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been obtained from the University of Newcastle (H-2021-0418), the NSW Department of Education (SERAP:2022215), Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH00052) and the Catholic Schools Office. The design, conduct and reporting will adhere to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement, the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies statement and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist. Findings will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals, key stakeholders will be provided with a detailed report. We will support ongoing dissemination of RT4T in Australian schools via professional learning for teachers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12622000861752.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayden Thomas Kelly
- School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Active Living and Learning, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jordan James Smith
- School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Active Living and Learning, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angeliek Verdonschot
- School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Active Living and Learning, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Grace Kennedy
- School of Health Sciences, Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joseph J Scott
- School of Education and Tertiary Access, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
- School of Education, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Heather McKay
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Active Aging Research Team, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nicole Nathan
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachel Sutherland
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philip James Morgan
- School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Active Living and Learning, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jo Salmon
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dawn Penney
- School of Education, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - James Boyer
- School Sport Unit, NSW Department of Education, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rhodri S Lloyd
- Youth Physical Development Centre, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Christopher Oldmeadow
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Penny Reeves
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirrilly Pursey
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Food and Nutrition Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Myna Hua
- Health Promotion Service, Population Health, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Longmore
- Health Promotion Service, Western NSW Local Health District, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer Norman
- School of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Health Promotion Service, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander Voukelatos
- Population Health Research and Evaluation Hub, Sydney Local Health District, Forest Lodge, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Avigdor Zask
- Health Promotion, Northern NSW Local Health District, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
- North Coast University Centre for Rural Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Revalds Lubans
- School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Active Living and Learning, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wilson M, van Allen ZM, Grimshaw JM, Brehaut JC, Durand A, Lalonde JF, Manuel DG, Michie S, West R, Presseau J. Reducing touching eyes, nose and mouth ('T-zone') to reduce the spread of infectious disease: A prospective study of motivational, volitional and non-reflective predictors. Br J Health Psychol 2023; 28:893-913. [PMID: 36997474 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The route into the body for many pathogens is through the eyes, nose and mouth (i.e., the 'T-zone') via inhalation or fomite-based transfer during face touching. It is important to understand factors that are associated with touching the T-zone to inform preventive strategies. PURPOSE To identify theory-informed predictors of intention to reduce facial 'T-zone' touching and self-reported 'T-zone' touching. METHODS We conducted a nationally representative prospective questionnaire study of Canadians. Respondents were randomized to answer questions about touching their eyes, nose, or mouth with a questionnaire assessing 11 factors from an augmented Health Action Process Approach at baseline: intention, outcome expectancies, risk perception, individual severity, self-efficacy, action planning, coping planning, social support, automaticity, goal facilitation and stability of context. At 2-week follow-up, we assessed HAPA-based indicators of self-regulatory activities (awareness of standards, effort, self-monitoring) and self-reported behaviour (primary dependent variable). RESULTS Of 656 Canadian adults recruited, 569 responded to follow-up (87% response rate). Across all areas of the 'T-zone', outcome expectancy was the strongest predictor of intention to reduce facial 'T-zone' touching, while self-efficacy was a significant predictor for only the eyes and mouth. Automaticity was the strongest predictor of behaviour at the 2-week follow-up. No sociodemographic or psychological factors predicted behaviour, with the exception of self-efficacy, which negatively predicted eye touching. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that focusing on reflective processes may increase intention to reduce 'T-zone' touching, while reducing actual 'T-zone' touching may require strategies that address the automatic nature of this behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie Wilson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zachary M van Allen
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jamie C Brehaut
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Audrey Durand
- Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-François Lalonde
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Douglas G Manuel
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Michie
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert West
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Justin Presseau
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Woodfield MJ, Phillips ST, Cargo T, Merry SN, McNeil CB, Hetrick SE. Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to Develop an Intervention to 'Re-implement' Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2023; 50:976-998. [PMID: 37691065 PMCID: PMC10543774 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01298-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is an empirically supported treatment for childhood conduct problems, with increasing numbers of clinicians being trained in Aotearoa/New Zealand. However, ensuring sustained delivery of effective treatments by trained clinicians in routine care environments is notoriously challenging. The aims of this qualitative study were to (1) systematically examine and prioritise PCIT implementation barriers and facilitators, and (2) develop a well specified and theory-driven 're-implementation' intervention to support already-trained clinicians to resume or increase their implementation of PCIT. To triangulate and refine existing understanding of PCIT implementation determinants from an earlier cross-sectional survey, we integrated previously unanalysed qualitative survey data (54 respondents; response rate 60%) with qualitative data from six new focus groups with 15 PCIT-trained clinicians and managers in Aotearoa/New Zealand. We deductively coded data, using a directed content analysis process and the Theoretical Domains Framework, resulting in the identification of salient theoretical domains and belief statements within these. We then used the Theory and Techniques Tool to identify behaviour change techniques, possible intervention components, and their hypothesised mechanisms of action. Eight of the 14 theoretical domains were identified as influential on PCIT-trained clinician implementation behaviour (Knowledge; Social/Professional Role and Identity; Beliefs about Capabilities; Beliefs about Consequences; Memory, Attention and Decision Processes; Environmental Context and Resources; Social Influences; Emotion). Two of these appeared to be particularly salient: (1) 'Environmental Context and Resources', specifically lacking suitable PCIT equipment, with (lack of) access to a well-equipped clinic room appearing to influence implementation behaviour in several ways. (2) 'Social/Professional Role and Identity', with beliefs relating to a perception that colleagues view time-out as harmful to children, concerns that internationally-developed PCIT is not suitable for non-Māori clinicians to deliver to Indigenous Māori families, and clinicians feeling obligated yet isolated in their advocacy for PCIT delivery. In conclusion, where initial implementation has stalled or languished, re-implementation may be possible, and makes good sense, both fiscally and practically. This study suggests that re-implementation of PCIT in Aotearoa/New Zealand may be facilitated by intervention components such as ensuring access to a colleague or co-worker who is supportive of PCIT delivery, access to suitable equipment (particularly a time-out room), and targeted additional training for clinicians relating to the safety of time-out for children. The feasibility and acceptability of these intervention components will be tested in a future clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie J. Woodfield
- Te Ara Hāro-Centre for Infant, Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142 New Zealand
- Te Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand), Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Tania Cargo
- Te Ara Hāro-Centre for Infant, Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142 New Zealand
- Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sally N. Merry
- Te Ara Hāro-Centre for Infant, Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142 New Zealand
| | - Cheryl B. McNeil
- Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Sarah E. Hetrick
- Te Ara Hāro-Centre for Infant, Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142 New Zealand
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Boulet M, Stott A, Kneebone S. Which behaviours matter? Prioritising food waste reduction behaviours for targeted policy and program approaches. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2023; 345:118668. [PMID: 37515884 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
More than half of the waste in the global food system's consumption stage comes from households, which therefore represent a critical entry point to tackle this challenge with its combined social, economic, and environmental impacts. Yet there is a tension for policy makers between promoting food waste reduction behaviours to householders and overloading them with too many options that make them less likely to engage. This study utilises an Impact-Likelihood methodology to identify the range of behaviours associated with household food waste reduction and to group them according to their impact and likelihood of adoption, as well as their current adoption rates. Scores for these measures were generated using data from an expert elicitation survey of food waste policy makers and practitioners, as well as a large-scale householder survey. The Impact-Likelihood matrix for household food waste reduction behaviours generated in this study identifies potential priority behaviours that are both impactful in tackling the substantive challenge of food waste and have a high likelihood of uptake by householders. As such, the matrix provides strategic research and decision support for policy makers in prioritising specific behaviours for more targeted engagement with householders in different geographical or jurisdictional contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Boulet
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, 8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
| | - Annika Stott
- OzHarvest, PO Box 7257, Alexandria, NSW, 2015, Australia.
| | - Sarah Kneebone
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, 8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yamada J, Kouri A, Simard SN, Lam Shin Cheung J, Segovia S, Gupta S. Improving computerized decision support system interventions: a qualitative study combining the theoretical domains framework with the GUIDES Checklist. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:226. [PMID: 37853386 PMCID: PMC10585867 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02273-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can improve care by bridging knowledge to practice gaps. However, the real-world uptake of such systems in health care settings has been suboptimal. We sought to: (1) use the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify determinants (barriers/enablers) of uptake of the Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS) CDSS; (2) match identified TDF belief statements to elements in the Guideline Implementation with Decision Support (GUIDES) Checklist; and (3) explore the relationship between the TDF and GUIDES frameworks and the usefulness of this sequential approach for identifying opportunities to improve CDSS uptake. METHODS In Phase 1, we conducted semistructured interviews with primary care physicians in Toronto, Canada regarding the uptake of the eAMS CDSS. Using content analysis, two coders independently analyzed interview transcripts guided by the TDF to generate themes representing barriers and enablers to CDSS uptake. In Phase 2, the same reviewers independently mapped each belief statement to a GUIDES domain and factor. We calculated the proportion of TDF belief statements that linked to each GUIDES domain and the proportion of TDF domains that linked to GUIDES factors (and vice-versa) and domains. RESULTS We interviewed 10 participants before data saturation. In Phase 1, we identified 53 belief statements covering 12 TDF domains; 18 (34.0%) were barriers, and 35 (66.0%) were enablers. In Phase 2, 41 statements (77.4%) linked to at least one GUIDES factor, while 12 (22.6%) did not link to any specific factor. The GUIDES Context Domain was linked to the largest number of belief statements (19/53; 35.8%). Each TDF domain linked to one or more GUIDES factor, with 6 TDF domains linking to more than 1 factor and 8 TDF domains linking to more than 1 GUIDES domain. CONCLUSIONS The TDF provides unique insights into barriers and enablers to CDSS uptake, which can then be mapped to GUIDES domains and factors to identify required changes to CDSS context, content, and system. This can be followed by conventional mapping of TDF domains to behaviour change techniques to optimize CDSS implementation. This novel step-wise approach combines two established frameworks to optimize CDSS interventions, and requires prospective validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Yamada
- Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Faculty of Community Services, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - Andrew Kouri
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Sarah Nicole Simard
- Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Faculty of Community Services, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Lam Shin Cheung
- Keenan Research Center, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Stephanie Segovia
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond Street, M5B 1W8, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Samir Gupta
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond Street, M5B 1W8, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
MacDonald J, Estcourt CS, Flowers P, Nandwani R, Frankis J, Young I, Clutterbuck D, Dalrymple J, McDaid L, Steedman N, Saunders J. Improving HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence and retention in care: Process evaluation and recommendation development from a nationally implemented PrEP programme. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292289. [PMID: 37812636 PMCID: PMC10561843 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), in which people take HIV medication to prevent HIV acquisition, underpins global HIV transmission elimination strategies. Effective prevention needs people to adhere to PrEP and remain in care during periods of risk, but this is difficult to achieve. We undertook a process evaluation of Scotland's PrEP programme to explore barriers and facilitators to PrEP adherence and retention in care and to systematically develop evidence-based, theoretically-informed recommendations to address them. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups (09/2018-07/2019) with patients who identified as gay or bisexual men and were either using PrEP, had declined the offer of PrEP, had stopped PrEP, or had been assessed as ineligible for PrEP (n = 39 of whom n = 5 (13%) identified as trans, median age 31 years and interquartile range 14 years), healthcare professionals involved in PrEP provision (n = 54 including specialist sexual health doctors and nurses of various grades, PrEP prescribing general practitioners, health promotion officers, midwifes, and a PrEP clinical secretary), and clients (n = 9) and staff (n = 15) of non-governmental organisations with an HIV prevention remit across Scotland. We used thematic analysis to map key barriers and facilitators to priority areas that could enhance adherence and retention in care. We used implementation science analytic tools (Theoretical Domains Framework, Intervention Functions, Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy, APEASE criteria) and expert opinion to systematically generate recommendations. RESULTS Barriers included perceived complexity of on-demand dosing, tendency for users to stop PrEP before seeking professional support, troublesome side-effects, limited flexibility in the settings/timings/nature of review appointments, PrEP-related stigma and emerging stigmas around not using PrEP. Facilitators included flexible appointment scheduling, reminders, and processes to follow up non-attenders. Examples of the 25 recommendations include: emphasising benefits of PrEP reviews and providing appointments flexibly within individualised PrEP care; using clinic systems to remind/recall PrEP users; supporting PrEP conversations among sexual partners; clear on-demand dosing guidance; encouraging good PrEP citizenship; detailed discussion on managing side-effects and care/coping planning activities. CONCLUSIONS PrEP adherence and retention in care is challenging, reducing the effectiveness of PrEP at individual and population levels. We identify and provide solutions to where and how collaborative interventions across public health, clinical, and community practice could address these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer MacDonald
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Claudia S. Estcourt
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Sandyford Sexual Health Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Flowers
- School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Rak Nandwani
- Sandyford Sexual Health Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
- College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jamie Frankis
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Ingrid Young
- Centre for Biomedicine, Self & Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Dan Clutterbuck
- Chalmers Sexual Health Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny Dalrymple
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa McDaid
- Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nicola Steedman
- Chief Medical Officer Directorate, Scottish Government, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - John Saunders
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nathan N, Hall A, Shoesmith A, Bauman AE, Peden B, Duggan B, Gardner C, Lane C, Lecathelinais C, Oldmeadow C, Duncan C, Groombridge D, Riley-Gibson E, Pollock E, Boyer J, Wiggers J, Gillham K, Pattinson M, Mattingly M, McCarthy N, Naylor PJ, Reeves P, Budgen P, Sutherland R, Jackson R, Croft T, Pascoe W, Wolfenden L. A cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a multi-strategy sustainability intervention on teachers' sustained implementation of classroom physical activity breaks (energisers): study protocol. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1942. [PMID: 37805480 PMCID: PMC10559446 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16810-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Governments internationally have invested hugely in the implementation and scale-up of school-based physical activity interventions, but have little evidence of how to best sustain these interventions once active implementation support ceases. This study will assess the effectiveness of a multi-strategy sustainability intervention on classroom teachers' sustainment of energisers (short 3-5 min physical activity breaks during class-time) scheduled across the school day from baseline to 12 and 24-month follow-up. METHODS A cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 50 primary schools within the Hunter New England, Illawarra Shoalhaven, Murrumbidgee and Northern New South Wales (NSW) Local Health Districts of NSW Australia. Schools will be randomly allocated to receive either usual support or the multi-strategy sustainability intervention that includes: centralised technical assistance from a trained project officer; formal commitment and mandated change obtained from school principals; training in-school champions; reminders for teachers; educational materials provided to teachers; capturing and sharing local knowledge; and engagement of parents, carers and the wider school community. The primary trial outcome will be measured via a teacher logbook to determine the between-group difference in the change in mean minutes of energisers scheduled across the school day at 12 and 24-month follow-up compared to baseline. Analyses will be performed using an intention to treat framework. Linear mixed models will be used to assess intervention effects on the primary outcome at both follow-up periods. DISCUSSION This study will be one of the first randomised controlled trials to examine the impact of a multi-strategy sustainability intervention to support schools' sustainment of a physical activity intervention. The proposed research will generate new evidence needed for the partnering organisations to protect their considerable investments to date in physical activity promotion in this setting and will provide seminal evidence for the field globally. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12620000372987 version 1 registered 17th March 2020. Version 3 (current version) updated 4th August 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Nathan
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Alix Hall
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Adam Shoesmith
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag No. 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia
| | - Adrian E. Bauman
- Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre (D17), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW Australia
| | - Belinda Peden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Bernadette Duggan
- Catholic Schools Office Diocese of Maitland-Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Carly Gardner
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Cassandra Lane
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Christophe Lecathelinais
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | | | - Craig Duncan
- Catholic Schools Office Diocese of Maitland-Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Daniel Groombridge
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Edward Riley-Gibson
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Emma Pollock
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - James Boyer
- The NSW Department of Education, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - John Wiggers
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Karen Gillham
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Martina Pattinson
- Health Promotion, Northern NSW Local Health District, Lismore, NSW Australia
| | - Megan Mattingly
- Health Promotion, Murrumbidgee Local Health District, Suite 1B/620 Macauley Street, Albury, NSW 2640 Australia
| | - Nicole McCarthy
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Patti-Jean Naylor
- School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC Canada
| | - Penny Reeves
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Philippa Budgen
- Health Promotion Service, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, NSW Health, Warrawong, NSW Australia
| | - Rachel Sutherland
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Rebecca Jackson
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Thomas Croft
- Aboriginal Health Unit, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW Australia
| | - William Pascoe
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cruden G, Crable EL, Lengnick-Hall R, Purtle J. Who's "in the room where it happens"? A taxonomy and five-step methodology for identifying and characterizing policy actors. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:113. [PMID: 37723580 PMCID: PMC10506261 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00492-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Engaging policy actors in research design and execution is critical to increasing the practical relevance and real-world impact of policy-focused dissemination and implementation science. Identifying and selecting which policy actors to engage, particularly actors involved in "Big P" public policies such as laws, is distinct from traditional engaged research methods. This current study aimed to develop a transparent, structured method for iteratively identifying policy actors involved in key policy decisions-such as adopting evidence-based interventions at systems-scale-and to guide implementation study sampling and engagement approaches. A flexible policy actor taxonomy was developed to supplement existing methods and help identify policy developers, disseminators, implementers, enforcers, and influencers. METHODS A five-step methodology for identifying policy actors to potentially engage in policy dissemination and implementation research was developed. Leveraging a recent federal policy as a case study-The Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA)-publicly available documentation (e.g., websites, reports) were searched, retrieved, and coded using content analysis to characterize the organizations and individual policy actors in the "room" during policy decisions. RESULTS The five steps are as follows: (1) clarify the policy implementation phase(s) of interest, (2) identify relevant proverbial or actual policymaking "rooms," (3) identify and characterize organizations in the room, (4) identify and characterize policy actors in the "room," and (5) quantify (e.g., count actors across groups), summarize, and compare "rooms" to develop or select engagement approaches aligned with the "room" and actors. The use and outcomes of each step are exemplified through the FFPSA case study. CONCLUSIONS The pragmatic and transparent policy actor identification steps presented here can guide researchers' methods for continuous sampling and successful policy actor engagement. Future work should explore the utility of the proposed methods for guiding selection and tailoring of engagement and implementation strategies (e.g., research-policy actor partnerships) to improve both "Big P" and "little p" (administrative guidelines, procedures) policymaking and implementation in global contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gracelyn Cruden
- Chestnut Health System, Lighthouse Institute-Oregon Group, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.
| | - Erika L Crable
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Purtle
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Graham ND, Graham ID, Vanderspank-Wright B, Varin MD, Nadalin Penno L, Fergusson DA, Squires JE. A systematic review and critical appraisal of guidelines and their recommendations for sedation interruptions in adult mechanically ventilated patients. Aust Crit Care 2023; 36:889-901. [PMID: 36522246 DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives of the review were to (i) assess the methodological quality of all accessible and published guidelines and care bundles that offer a recommendation related to sedation interruptions, using the AGREE-II instrument, to (ii) determine what is the recommended best practice for sedation interruptions from the available guidelines, and then to have (iii) a closer inspection of the overall credibility and applicability of the recommendations using the AGREE-REX instrument. This review will benefit the outcomes of critically ill patients and the multidisciplinary team responsible for the care of mechanically ventilated adults with continuous medication infusions by providing a synthesis of the recommended action(s), actor(s), contextual information, target(s), and timing related to sedation interruptions from current best practice. REVIEW METHOD USED We conducted a systematic review. DATA SOURCES We applied a peer-reviewed search strategy to four electronic databases from 2010 to November 2021-MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews-and included grey literature. REVIEW METHOD Findings are reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses checklist. We assessed overall quality using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II and AGREE Recommendation Excellence tools. RESULTS We identified 11 clinical practice guidelines and care bundles comprising 15 recommendations related to sedation interruption. There are three key findings: (i) deficiencies exist with the methodological quality of included guidelines, (ii) sedation interruption is recommended practice for the care of adult mechanically ventilated patients, and (iii) the current evidence is of low quality, which impacts overall credibility and applicability of the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Sedation interruptions are currently best practice for adult mechanically ventilated patients; however, the available guidelines and recommendations have several deficiencies. Future research is needed to further understand the role of the nurse and other actors to enact this practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole D Graham
- University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
| | - Ian D Graham
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, P.O. Box 711, Ottawa ON, K1H 8L6, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
| | - Brandi Vanderspank-Wright
- University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
| | - Melissa Demery Varin
- University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
| | - Letitia Nadalin Penno
- University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, P.O. Box 711, Ottawa ON, K1H 8L6, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, P.O. Box 711, Ottawa ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
| | - Janet E Squires
- University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, P.O. Box 711, Ottawa ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cook N, Collins J, Porter J, Goodwin D. Applying the theoretical domains framework and behavior change wheel to inform interventions for food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices. Front Nutr 2023; 10:1204980. [PMID: 37654474 PMCID: PMC10465701 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1204980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Completing aggregate food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices is an intense practice, however they can demonstrate problem areas that require attention to reduce waste. Identifying interventions to facilitate and improve the implementation of these audits can be guided by behavior change science. The aims of this study were to use behavior change theories and frameworks to (1) describe the drivers of behavior to complete food and food-related waste audits and (2) identify possible interventions that support the implementation and uptake of these audits. Methods Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants from hospitals in Victoria, Australia who worked in their foodservice system. Semi-structured interviews sought knowledge of participant's perceived barriers and enablers to completing food and food-related waste audits. Deductive analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capability Opportunity Motivation Behavior theory (COM-B) identified dominant drivers of behavior. TDF domains were then matched to their corresponding intervention functions according to the Behavior Change Wheel framework (BCW) to identify relevant strategies that may support audit implementation. Results Data from 20 interviews found the dominant COM-B constructs (TDF domains) were psychological capability (knowledge, skills), physical opportunity (environmental context and resources), and reflective motivation (social/professional role and identity, beliefs about capabilities). These dominant domains come from narratives that participants shared about foodservice staffs' lack of knowledge, labor, time, and the hospital avoiding responsibility for audit completion. Corresponding intervention functions that could have the most potential for implementing waste audits were education, training, environmental restructuring, modeling, and enablement. Participants' shared perspectives of audit enablers resembled these: for example, obtaining staff buy-in, reinforcing behavior through incentives and installing an audit champion. Conclusion To transition toward regular food and food-related waste auditing practices in hospital foodservices these findings may help identify practice and policy change that delivers standardized auditing activities to encourage long term behavior change. Interventions to support audit completion should address each behavioral construct and relevant domain, as individual hospital sites will experience unique contextual factors and expectations influencing audit outcomes. A co-design process that includes staff and stakeholders of hospital foodservices is recommended to enable engagement and practical solutions to audit implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Cook
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Jorja Collins
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia
- Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Judi Porter
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Denise Goodwin
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Estcourt CS, MacDonald J, Saunders J, Nandwani R, Young I, Frankis J, Clutterbuck D, Steedman N, McDaid L, Dalrymple J, Flowers P. Improving HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake and initiation: process evaluation and recommendation development from a national PrEP program<a href="#FN1"> †</a>. Sex Health 2023; 20:282-295. [PMID: 37603534 DOI: 10.1071/sh22170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is key to HIV transmission elimination but implementation is challenging and under-researched. We undertook a process evaluation of the first 2years of a national PrEP program to explore barriers and facilitators to implementation and to develop recommendations to improve implementation, focusing on PrEP uptake and initiation. METHODS Stage 1 involved semi-structured telephone interviews and focus groups (September 2018-July 2019) with geographically and demographically diverse patients seeking/using/declining/stopping PrEP (n =39), sexual healthcare professionals (n =54), community-based organisation service users (n =9) and staff (n =15) across Scotland. We used deductive thematic analysis, to derive and then map key barriers and facilitators to priority areas that experts agreed would enhance uptake and initiation. In Stage 2, we used analytic tools from implementation science to systematically generate evidence-based, theoretically-informed recommendations to enhance uptake and initiation of PrEP. RESULTS Barriers and facilitators were multi-levelled and interdependent. Barriers included the rapid pace of implementation without additional resource, and a lack of familiarity with PrEP prescribing. Facilitators included opportunities for acquisition of practice-based knowledge and normalisation of initiation activities. We refined our 68 'long-list' recommendations to 41 using expert input and the APEASE (Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side-effects, and Equity) criteria. Examples include: provision of PrEP in diverse settings to reach all in need; co-produced, culturally sensitive training resources for healthcare professionals, with focused content on non-daily dosing; meaningful collaborative working across all stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS These evidence-based, theory informed recommendations provide a robust framework for optimising PrEP uptake and initiation in diverse settings to ensure PrEP reaches all who may benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia S Estcourt
- School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK; and Sandyford Sexual Health Services, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 6 Sandyford Place, Glasgow G3 7NB, UK
| | - Jennifer MacDonald
- School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - John Saunders
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, London WC1E 6JB, UK; and HPA Health Protection Services, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK
| | - Rak Nandwani
- Sandyford Sexual Health Services, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 6 Sandyford Place, Glasgow G3 7NB, UK; and College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Ingrid Young
- Centre for Biomedicine, Self & Society, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - Jamie Frankis
- School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Dan Clutterbuck
- Chalmers Sexual Health Centre, NHS Lothian, 2A Chalmers Street, Edinburgh EH3 9ES, UK
| | - Nicola Steedman
- Chief Medical Officer Directorate, Scottish Government, St Andrew's House, Regent Road, Edinburgh, EH1 3DG, UK
| | - Lisa McDaid
- Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
| | - Jenny Dalrymple
- School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - Paul Flowers
- School of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond Street, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Proctor EK, Bunger AC, Lengnick-Hall R, Gerke DR, Martin JK, Phillips RJ, Swanson JC. Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review. Implement Sci 2023; 18:31. [PMID: 37491242 PMCID: PMC10367273 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proctor and colleagues' 2011 paper proposed a taxonomy of eight implementation outcomes and challenged the field to address a research agenda focused on conceptualization, measurement, and theory building. Ten years later, this paper maps the field's progress in implementation outcomes research. This scoping review describes how each implementation outcome has been studied, research designs and methods used, and the contexts and settings represented in the current literature. We also describe the role of implementation outcomes in relation to implementation strategies and other outcomes. METHODS Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping reviews guided our methods. Using forward citation tracing, we identified all literature citing the 2011 paper. We conducted our search in the Web of Science (WOS) database and added citation alerts sent to the first author from the publisher for a 6-month period coinciding with the WOS citation search. This produced 1346 titles and abstracts. Initial abstract screening yielded 480 manuscripts, and full-text review yielded 400 manuscripts that met inclusion criteria (empirical assessment of at least one implementation outcome). RESULTS Slightly more than half (52.1%) of included manuscripts examined acceptability. Fidelity (39.3%), feasibility (38.6%), adoption (26.5%), and appropriateness (21.8%) were also commonly examined. Penetration (16.0%), sustainability (15.8%), and cost (7.8%) were less frequently examined. Thirty-two manuscripts examined implementation outcomes not included in the original taxonomy. Most studies took place in healthcare (45.8%) or behavioral health (22.5%) organizations. Two-thirds used observational designs. We found little evidence of progress in testing the relationships between implementation strategies and implementation outcomes, leaving us ill-prepared to know how to achieve implementation success. Moreover, few studies tested the impact of implementation outcomes on other important outcome types, such as service systems and improved individual or population health. CONCLUSIONS Our review presents a comprehensive snapshot of the research questions being addressed by existing implementation outcomes literature and reveals the need for rigorous, analytic research and tests of strategies for attaining implementation outcomes in the next 10 years of outcomes research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enola K Proctor
- The Brown School, Shanti Khinduka Distinguished Professor Emerita, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
| | - Alicia C Bunger
- College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Donald R Gerke
- Department of Social Work, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Jared K Martin
- College of Education & Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Rebecca J Phillips
- College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, OR, USA
| | - Julia C Swanson
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Turner R, Hart J, Ashiru-Oredope D, Atkins L, Eades C, Felton T, Howlett E, Rice S, Shallcross L, Lorencatto F, Byrne-Davis L. A qualitative interview study applying the COM-B model to explore how hospital-based trainers implement antimicrobial stewardship education and training in UK hospital-based care. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:770. [PMID: 37468860 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09559-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat caused by the inappropriate use of antimicrobials in healthcare and other settings. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is a broad multi-component health services intervention that promotes and monitors the judicious use of antimicrobials to preserve their future effectiveness. A main component of AMS is education and training (E&T). However, there are often discrepancies in how such interventions are implemented and delivered in hospital-based care. The aim of this study was to explore the factors influencing the implementation of AMS E&T in UK hospitals. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were carried out with AMS E&T trainers in UK hospitals. The interview schedule was developed using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation = Behaviour (COM-B) model. Participants were identified via professional networks and social media. Interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis, followed by deductive analysis using the COM-B model as a framework. RESULTS A total of 34 participants (26 antimicrobial pharmacists, 3 nurses, 1 advanced clinical practitioner, 2 infectious disease consultants, 1 microbiologist and 1 clinical scientist). responsible for designing, implementing and evaluating AMS E&T in UK hospitals (five from Northern Ireland, four from Wales, two from Scotland and 23 from England) took part in virtual interviews. Key themes were: (1) The organisational context, including system-level barriers to AMS included competing organisational targets (Reflective motivation and physical opportunity) and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on activity (Physical opportunity); (2) Healthcare professionals' roles and the wider multi-disciplinary team, such that AMS roles were defined and addressed poorly in E&T (Social opportunity); and (3) The individual perception of the need for AMS E&T in hospital-based care, manifest in a perceived lack of conviction of the wider threat of AMR and the resulting need for AMS E&T (Reflective motivation). CONCLUSION This study has identified factors influencing implementation of AMS E&T in UK hospitals and further identified where implemented, AMS E&T did not address real-world challenges. Current AMS E&T needs to be optimised to elicit practice change, with recommendations including training and engaging the wider work-force and drawing upon theoretically-informed intervention development frameworks to inform AMS E&T to better target AMS behaviour change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Turner
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Jo Hart
- Division of Medical Education, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Lou Atkins
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christopher Eades
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Tim Felton
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation, Manchester, UK
| | - Emily Howlett
- Vocal, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen Rice
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, the University of Newcastle Upon, Tyne, UK
| | - Laura Shallcross
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Lucie Byrne-Davis
- Division of Medical Education, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Musanje K, Kamya MR, Kasujja R, Hooper N, Katahoire AR, White RG, Kimera E, Getahun M, Sinclair DL, Ojiambo D, Camlin CS. Acceptability of an adapted mindfulness and acceptance-based intervention to support adolescents with HIV: A qualitative study with Ugandan health care providers. JOURNAL OF CONTEXTUAL BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE 2023; 29:160-168. [PMID: 37519920 PMCID: PMC10373499 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
While the adaptation of evidence-based psychosocial support tailors the intervention components to the targeted context, minimizing the associated costs of developing new interventions for low-income contexts, the acceptability of such adapted interventions is important for augmenting successful implementation and sustainability. Given that psychosocial support to persons living with HIV is mostly rendered by healthcare providers, their acceptance of adapted interventions before implementation is crucial. This study explored healthcare providers' acceptance of an adapted mindfulness and acceptance-based intervention supporting adolescents with HIV. Ten healthcare providers at two urban clinics in Kampala, Uganda attended a three-day training on using the adapted intervention and gave feedback on its appropriateness during in-depth interviews conducted thereafter. Semi-structured interviews were based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and findings were analyzed abductively within the seven components of the framework. Overall, the adapted intervention was perceived to be acceptable and appropriate for use with adolescents. Benefits included the intervention offering support beyond a focus on adherence to drugs, refocusing adolescents on aspects in their lives that matter most, and being easy to integrate into providers' work processes. Providers however expressed concern about the time the intervention requires and the possibility of increasing their workload. These findings will support further adaptation and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khamisi Musanje
- Department of Educational, Social and Organizational Psychology, Makerere University, Uganda
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Makerere University, Uganda
| | | | - Rosco Kasujja
- Department of Mental Health and Community Psychology, Makerere University, Uganda
| | - Nic Hooper
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| | | | - Ross G. White
- School of Psychology, Queens University, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Emanuel Kimera
- Department of Public Health, Mountain of the Moon University, Uganda
| | - Monica Getahun
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | | | - Deborah Ojiambo
- Department of Mental Health and Community Psychology, Makerere University, Uganda
| | - Carol S. Camlin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences. University of California, San Francisco, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mill D, Page AT, Johnson J, Lloyd R, Salter S, Lee K, Seubert L, Clifford RM, D'Lima D. Behaviours that contribute to pharmacist professionalism: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070265. [PMID: 37369416 PMCID: PMC10410845 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clearly understanding and describing professional behaviours of pharmacists allows the profession, researchers and policy-makers to observe and monitor the professionalism of pharmacists, and design interventions to improve it where needed. The primary objective of this review was to identify which behaviours are discussed to contribute to professionalism in registered pharmacists in peer-reviewed literature. The secondary objective was to review the identified behaviours using a behavioural specification framework to understand how they are expressed. DESIGN A scoping literature review was conducted. DATA SOURCES An electronic database search of Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, PsychArticles, Emcare and Medline limited to articles published in English from 1 January 2000 to 21 October 2022 was conducted. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Eligible articles contributed behaviourally relevant content with reference to registered pharmacists' professionalism. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Extracted behaviourally relevant content was subject to researcher's familiarisation, then deductive coding to one of two overarching definitions of technical or non-technical behaviour. Data were then inductively coded through assignment of a descriptive code to identify categories of professional behaviour within these two overarching types of behaviour. RESULTS Seven articles were identified and included in the final analysis. From the extracted behaviourally relevant content, 18 categories of behaviours were identified. All articles identified behaviours in categories titled 'establishes effective relationships' and 'complies with regulations codes and operating procedures'. Identified behaviours were often broadly described and merged with descriptions of influences on them and broader outcomes that they contribute to. CONCLUSIONS Behaviours described to contribute to pharmacists' professionalism in the literature are broad and non-specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna Mill
- School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Amy Theresa Page
- School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jacinta Johnson
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- SA Pharmacy, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Renae Lloyd
- SA Pharmacy, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sandra Salter
- School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kenneth Lee
- School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Liza Seubert
- School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rhonda Marise Clifford
- School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Danielle D'Lima
- Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gallant AJ, Steenbeek A, Halperin SA, Parsons Leigh J, Curran JA. Identifying and addressing the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on school-based immunisation programmes in the Canadian Maritimes: a mixed methods study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073172. [PMID: 37369397 PMCID: PMC10410997 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of keeping up to date on routine vaccinations. Throughout the pandemic, many routine vaccine programmes in Canada were paused or cancelled, including school-based immunisation programmes (SBIP). This resulted in decreased coverage for many vaccine-preventable diseases. While the effects of the pandemic on SBIP have been described in other provinces, its effects in the Maritime region (ie, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island) have yet to be understood. We aim to determine how these programmes were affected by COVID-19 and associated public health measures in the Canadian Maritimes by (1) identifying and describing usual and interim catch-up programmes; (2) exploring stakeholders' perceptions of SBIP through interviews; and (3) designing recommendations with stakeholders to address gaps in SBIP and vaccine coverage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A sequential, explanatory mixed methods study design will be used to address the objectives during the study period (September 2022-December 2023). First, an environmental scan will describe changes to SBIP and vaccine coverage over a period of five school years (2018/2019-2022/2023). Findings will inform semistructured interviews (n=65) with key stakeholders (eg, health officials, healthcare providers, school officials and parents and adolescents) to explore perceptions of SBIP and changes in parental vaccine hesitancy during the pandemic. These data will be integrated to design recommendations to support SBIP during two stakeholder engagement meetings. Analysis will be guided by the behaviour change wheel, a series of complementary tools and frameworks to simplify behaviour diagnosis and analysis in public health research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval for this study has been obtained from Dalhousie University's Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (Ref: 2022-6395). Informed consent will be obtained from participants prior to participating in an interview or stakeholder engagement meeting. Study findings will be disseminated through conference presentations, publications and infographics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson J Gallant
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Audrey Steenbeek
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Scott A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Jeanna Parsons Leigh
- School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Janet A Curran
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Pediatrics, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kouijzer MMTE, Kip H, Bouman YHA, Kelders SM. Implementation of virtual reality in healthcare: a scoping review on the implementation process of virtual reality in various healthcare settings. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:67. [PMID: 37328858 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00442-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly used in healthcare settings as recent technological advancements create possibilities for diagnosis and treatment. VR is a technology that uses a headset to simulate a reality in which the user is immersed in a virtual environment, creating the impression that the user is physically present in this virtual space. Despite the potential added value of virtual reality technology in healthcare, its uptake in clinical practice is still in its infancy and challenges arise in the implementation of VR. Effective implementation could improve the adoption, uptake, and impact of VR. However, these implementation procedures still seem to be understudied in practice. This scoping review aimed to examine the current state of affairs in the implementation of VR technology in healthcare settings and to provide an overview of factors related to the implementation of VR. METHODS To give an overview of relevant literature, a scoping review was undertaken of articles published up until February 2022, guided by the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). The databases Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were systematically searched to identify records that highlighted the current state of affairs regarding the implementation of VR in healthcare settings. Information about each study was extracted using a structured data extraction form. RESULTS Of the 5523 records identified, 29 were included in this study. Most studies focused on barriers and facilitators to implementation, highlighting similar factors related to the behavior of adopters of VR and the practical resources the organization should arrange for. However, few studies focus on systematic implementation and on using a theoretical framework to guide implementation. Despite the recommendation of using a structured, multi-level implementation intervention to support the needs of all involved stakeholders, there was no link between the identified barriers and facilitators, and specific implementation objectives or suitable strategies to overcome these barriers in the included articles. CONCLUSION To take the implementation of VR in healthcare to the next level, it is important to ensure that implementation is not studied in separate studies focusing on one element, e.g., healthcare provider-related barriers, as is common in current literature. Based on the results of this study, we recommend that the implementation of VR entails the entire process, from identifying barriers to developing and employing a coherent, multi-level implementation intervention with suitable strategies. This implementation process could be supported by implementation frameworks and ideally focus on behavior change of stakeholders such as healthcare providers, patients, and managers. This in turn might result in increased uptake and use of VR technologies that are of added value for healthcare practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marileen M T E Kouijzer
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Technology, Human & Institutional Behaviour, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
| | - Hanneke Kip
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Technology, Human & Institutional Behaviour, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- Department of Research, Transfore, Deventer, Netherlands
| | | | - Saskia M Kelders
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Technology, Human & Institutional Behaviour, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Adisa A, Bahrami-Hessari M, Bhangu A, George C, Ghosh D, Glasbey J, Haque P, Ingabire JCA, Kamarajah SK, Kudrna L, Ledda V, Li E, Lillywhite R, Mittal R, Nepogodiev D, Ntirenganya F, Picciochi M, Simões JFF, Booth L, Elliot R, Kennerton AS, Pettigrove KL, Pinney L, Richard H, Tottman R, Wheatstone P, Wolfenden JWD, Smith A, Sayed AE, Goswami AG, Malik A, Mclean AL, Hassan A, Nazimi AJ, Aladna A, Abdelgawad A, Saed A, Abdelmageed A, Ghannam A, Mahmoud A, Alvi A, Ismail A, Adesunkanmi A, Ebrahim A, Al-Mallah A, Alqallaf A, Durrani A, Gabr A, Kirfi AM, Altaf A, Almutairi A, Sabbagh AJ, Ajiya A, Haddud A, Alnsour AAM, Singh A, Mittal A, Semple A, Adeniran A, Negussie A, Oladimeji A, Muhammad AB, Yassin A, Gungor A, Tarsitano A, Soibiharry A, Dyas A, Frankel A, Peckham-Cooper A, Truss A, Issaka A, Ads AM, Aderogba AA, Adeyeye A, Ademuyiwa A, Sleem A, Papa A, Cordova A, Appiah-Kubi A, Meead A, Nacion AJD, Michael A, Forneris AA, Duro A, Gonzalez AR, Altouny A, Ghazal A, Khalifa A, Ozair A, Quzli A, Haddad A, Othman AF, Yahaya AS, Elsherbiny A, Nazer A, Tarek A, Abu-Zaid A, Al-Nusairi A, Azab A, Elagili A, Elkazaz A, Kedwany A, Nuhu AM, Sakr A, Shehta A, Shirazi A, Mohamed AMI, Sherif AE, Awad AK, Abbas AM, Abdelrahman AS, Ammar AS, Azzam AY, Ciftci AB, Dural AC, Sanli AN, Rahy-Martín AC, Tantri AR, Khan A, Al-Touny A, Tariq A, Gmati A, Costas-Chavarri A, Auerkari A, Landaluce-Olavarria A, Puri A, Radhakrishnan A, Ubom AE, Pradhan A, Turna A, Adepiti A, Kuriyama A, Kassam AF, Hassouneh A, El-Hussuna A, Habeebullah A, Ads AM, Mousli A, Biloslavo A, Hoang A, Kirk A, Santini A, Melero AV, Calvache AJN, Baduell A, Chan A, Abrate A, Balduzzi A, Sánchez AC, Navarrete-Peón A, Porcu A, Brolese A, Barranquero AG, Saibene AM, Adam AA, Vagge A, Maquilón AJ, Leon-Andrino A, Sekulić A, Trifunovski A, Mako A, Bedada AG, Broglia A, Coppola A, Giani A, Grandi A, Iacomino A, Moro A, D’amico A, Malagnino A, Tang A, Doyle A, Alfieri A, Haynes A, Wilkins A, Baldwin A, Heriot A, Laird A, Lazarides A, O'connor A, Trulson A, Rokohl AC, Caziuc A, Triantafyllou A, Anesi A, Nikova A, Andrianakis A, Charalabopoulos A, Tsolakidis A, Chirca A, Arnaud AP, Narvaez-Rojas AR, Kavalakat A, Spina A, Recordare A, Annicchiarico A, Conti A, Mohammed AD, Kocataş A, Almhimid A, Arnaout A, Fahmy A, Mangi A, Modabber A, Ulas AB, Mohamedahmed AYY, Frontali A, Moynihan A, Yunus A, Ahmad A, Kent AJ, Khamees A, Ugwu AO, Turan A, Mohammed AAK, Navarro-Barrios A, Yebes A, De Sousa ÁFL, Moreno A, Sethi A, Dawson AC, Othman AAA, Kaur A, Wolde A, Antonelli A, Scifo A, Alhamad A, Davis A, Alderazi A, Harky A, Mohammed-Durosinlorun A, Seguya A, Okhakhu A, Chamakhi A, Sebai A, Souadka A, Asla A, Agrawal A, Persad A, Gupta A, Elgazar A, Kulkarni A, Coates A, Bellés AC, Hadzibegovic AD, Jotic A, Kowark A, Martins A, Pineda AM, Peral A, Gollarte AS, Senent-Boza A, Camarena AIA, Castaño-Leon AM, Bravo AMM, Moro AMG, Musina AM, Tapia-Herrero AM, Kothari A, Gupta A, Raja A, Aljaiuossi A, Taha A, Majbar AM, Prodromidou A, Kanatas A, Gupte A, Zakaria AD, Balla A, Barberis A, Bondurri A, Bottari A, Costantino A, Figus A, Lauretta A, Mingoli A, Romanzi A, Sagnotta A, Scacchi A, Picchetto A, Valadez AEC, Luzzi AP, Älgå A, Fontalis A, Hecker A, Demetriades AK, Serban AM, Văcărașu AB, Cokan A, Isaza-Restrepo A, Beamish A, Schache A, Stevenson A, Yiu A, Cockbain AJ, Litvin A, Abad-Motos A, Becerra A, Ramos ÁC, Chiaradia A, Dell A, Romano A, Pascale A, Marra AA, Dimas A, Kolias A, Cerovac A, Koneru A, Tidjane A, Agbeko AE, Bajaj A, Gosain A, Allan A, Carreras-Castañer A, D'amore A, Dare A, Maffioli A, Palepa A, Paspala A, Konney A, Gatta AND, Ezanno AC, Yiallourou A, Kinnair A, Rayner A, Scafa AK, Bowan AB, Veglia A, Russo A, Maniaci A, Castaldi A, Gil-Moreno A, Maffuz-Aziz A, Meola A, Nenna A, Ferrer AP, Bonilla AR, Ramos-De La Medina A, Infante AR, Santoro A, Laganà AS, Bateman A, Michael ALR, Abozid A, Seidu AS, Lowery A, Tantraworasin A, Rasheed A, Picciariello A, Isik A, Saif A, Anjum A, Ioannidis A, Abeldaño A, Hussain A, Nathan A, Bedzhanyan A, Perfecto A, De Virgilio A, Galvan A, Sablotzki A, Böttcher A, Pellacani A, Gatti A, Ibrahimli A, Menon A, Sahni A, Mwenda AS, Choudhry A, Jayawardane A, Gupta A, Ramasamy A, Mitul AR, Bawa A, Nugur A, Rammohan A, Sachdeva A, Mehraj A, Yildirim A, Alqaseer A, Radwan A, Sallam A, Syllaios A, Tampakis A, Alwael A, Samara A, Eroglu A, Rahman A, Ulkucu A, Zaránd A, Dulskas A, Tawiah A, Zani A, Vas A, Lukosiute-Urboniene A, Adamu A, Aujayeb A, Malik AA, İplikçi A, Mahmud A, Cil AP, Makanjuola A, Akwaisah A, Galandarova A, Saracoglu A, Regan A, Barlas AM, Alhassan BAB, Mostafa B, Hamida BB, Torun BC, Abdullah B, Balagobi B, Banky B, Singh B, Alegbeleye B, Yigit B, Hajjaj BN, Burgos-Blasco B, Seeliger B, Alayande B, Alhazmi B, Enodien B, Torre B, Pérez BG, Tamayo BV, De Andrés-Asenjo B, Quintana-Villamandos B, Girgin B, Barmayehvar B, Beisenov B, Creavin B, Dunne B, Marson B, Waterson B, Martin B, Zucker B, Wong BNX, Ozmen BB, Hammond B, Mbwele B, Núñez B, Dhondt B, Gafsi B, Mcleish B, Lieske B, Tailor B, La Pira B, Picardi B, Zampogna B, Casagranda B, Festa BM, Panda B, Kirmani B, Sulaiman B, Gurung B, Zacharia B, Bette B, Ayana B, Nikolovska B, Vilaró BC, De Vega Sánchez B, Hameed BZ, Diaconescu B, Kovacevic B, Bumber B, Sakakushev B, Tadic B, Malek B, Alrayes B, Thomas B, Gális B, Gallagher B, Knowles B, Cunningham B, Daley B, Mishra B, Ashford B, Pirozzi BM, Berselli B, Martinez-Leo B, Sensi B, Nardo B, Celik B, Giray B, Abud B, Almiqlash B, Pramesh CS, Taskiran C, De Campos Prado CA, Cipolla C, Kumar C, English C, Riccetti C, Vanni C, Brasset C, Downey C, Duffy C, Chwat C, Cutmore C, Sars C, Ratto C, Pacilio CA, De La Infiesta García C, Moreno CG, Magalhães C, Prada C, Zapata CS, Senni C, Flumignan CDQ, Martinez-Perez C, Duarte CL, Garcia CSR, Anderson C, Hing C, Cullinane C, Cina C, Zabkiewicz C, Sohrabi C, Guldogan CE, Ciubotaru C, Desai C, Raut C, Demetriou C, Handford C, Okpani C, Paranjape C, Koh C, Khatri C, Parmar C, Mok CW, Caricato C, Marafante C, Echieh CP, Tan CY, Ong CS, Conso C, Jardinez C, Konrads C, Warner C, Makwe CC, Henein C, Fleming C, Roland CL, Maurus C, Nitschke C, Mittermair C, Mallmann C, Andro C, Harmston C, Kuppler C, Lotz C, Nahm C, Rowe C, Ryalino C, Wallis C, Millward CP, Anthoulakis C, Apostolou C, Chouliaras C, Kalfountzos C, Kaselas C, Vosinakis C, Okereke C, Chean CS, Barlow C, Tatar C, Clancy C, Forde C, Sharpin C, Mccarthy C, Nestor C, Warden C, Ávila CC, Massaguer C, Fang CEH, Martins CP, Guerci C, Mauriello C, Holzmeister C, Miller C, Weber C, Wiesinger CG, Kenington C, Noel C, Sue-Chue-Lam C, Adumah C, Neary C, Sen C, Fitzgerald C, Ezeme C, Nastos C, Mesina C, Bombardini C, Torregrosa C, Valdespino CP, Don CP, Wickramasinghe D, Milanesi D, Armijos D, Asiimwe D, Beswick D, Clerc D, Cox D, Doherty D, Martínez DF, Lechuga DG, Gero D, Gil-Sala D, Lindegger D, Reim D, Shaerf D, Shmukler D, Branzan D, Filipescu D, Rega D, Bernardi D, Bissacco D, Fusario D, Morezzi D, Sabella D, Zimak DM, Vinci D, Sale D, Khan DZ, Thereska D, Andreotti D, Tartaglia D, Abdulai DR, Mukherjee D, Verdi D, Idowu D, John D, Johnson D, Moro-Valdezate D, Naumann D, Omar D, Proud D, Roberts D, Guzmán DS, Watson D, Bergkvist DJ, Lumenta DB, Ferrari D, Rizzo D, Degarege D, Castillo DFC, Douglas D, Wright D, Nanjiani D, Bratus D, Altun D, Sievers D, Vaysburg D, Katechia D, Ghosh D, Azize DA, Rodrigues D, Pachajoa DAP, Hayne D, Mutter D, Raimondo D, Eskinazi D, Sasia D, Corallino D, Muduly D, Grewal D, Hadzhiev D, Peristeri D, Pournaras D, Raptis DA, Angelou D, Haidopoulos D, Magouliotis D, Moris D, Schizas D, Symeonidis D, Tsironis D, Korkolis D, Tatsis D, Thekkinkattil D, Bulian DR, Pandey D, Vatansever D, Parker D, Wiedemann D, Borselle D, Pedini D, Schweitzer D, Venskutonis D, Otokwala J, Adamu KM, Pk P, Garod M, Ellafi AAD, Zivkovic D, Jelovac D, Wijeysundera D, Mcpherson D, Ryan É, Ugwu E, Baidoo EI, Shaddad E, Memişoğlu E, Naranjo EPL, Brodkin E, Segalini E, Viglietta E, Hendriks E, Bonci EA, Sá-Marta E, Ortega EN, Gomez EGL, Joviliano EE, Clune E, Horwell E, Mains E, Vasarhelyi E, Caruana EJ, Nevins EJ, Yenli EMTA, Baili E, Lostoridis E, Morgan E, Shiban E, Latif E, Tampaki EC, Ezenwa E, Irune E, Borg E, Eisa E, Gialamas E, Parvez E, Theophilidou E, Toma EA, Arnaoutoglou E, Samadov E, Kantor E, Ulman EA, Colak E, Cassinotti E, Bannone E, Sarjanoja E, Yates E, Vincent E, Lun EWY, Cerovac E, Dif ES, Alkhalifa E, Daketsey E, Fayad EA, Sheikh E, Pontecorvi E, Cammarata E, La Corte E, Rausa E, Odai ED, Guasch E, Cano-Trigueros E, Uldry E, Ros EP, Matthews E, Donmez EE, Giorgakis E, Kapetanakis E, Stamatakis E, Bua E, Schneck E, Nachelleh EA, Ofori EO, Akin E, Gönüllü E, Kirkan EF, Çelik E, Wong E, Capozzi E, Pinotti E, Colás-Ruiz E, González E, Fekaj E, Ohazurike E, Kebede E, Erginöz E, Duran EES, Scott E, Aytac E, Albanese E, Castro EJ, Albayadi E, Kriem E, Siddig E, Otify E, El Tayeb EEABH, Hong EH, Saguil E, Belzile E, Tuyishime E, Panieri E, Martínez EG, Myriokefalitaki E, Wong EG, Samara E, Agbeno EK, Drozdov E, Tokidis E, Shah FA, Barra F, Carbone F, Ferreli F, Marino F, Martinelli F, D'acapito F, Masciello F, Bàmbina F, Issa F, Salameh FT, Kethy F, Mahmood F, Gareb F, Idrees F, Karimian F, Ashraf F, Haji F, Inayat F, Begum F, Nabil F, Rosa F, Haider F, Parray F, Calculli F, Ferracci F, Saraceno F, Coppola F, Coccolini F, Fusini F, Migliorelli F, Pecoraro F, Alconchel F, Coimbra FJF, Trivik-Barrientos F, Naegele F, Almarshad F, Agresta F, Fleming F, Mendoza-Moreno F, Brzeszczyński F, Carannante F, Wu F, Aljanadi F, Hayati F, Campo F, Sorbi F, Milana F, Takeda FR, Shekleton F, Gessler F, Recker F, Grama F, Cherbanyk F, Faponle F, Angelis F, Calabretto F, Gaino F, Toia F, Bianco F, Bussu F, Cammarata F, Castagnini F, Colombo F, Ferrara F, Fleres F, Guerrera F, Litta F, Mongelli F, Pata F, Roscio F, Mulita F, Ardura F, Tejero-Pintor FJ, Calvo FJR, Escobedo FJB, Camacho FJB, Odicino F, Schmitt F, Bloemers F, Hölzle F, Gyamfi FE, Messner F, Koh F, Cáceres F, Smolle-Juettner FM, Herman F, Ayeni F, Djedovic G, De Oliveira GP, Rodrigues G, Wagner G, Bellio G, Giarratano G, Capolupo GT, Budd G, Marom G, Poillucci G, Thiruchandran G, Nicholson G, Groot G, Hoey G, Bass GA, Sachdev G, Agarwal G, Aggarwal G, Cormio G, Mazzarella G, Perrone G, Osterhoff G, Singer G, Dejeu G, Fowler G, Garas G, Gradinariu G, Theodoropoulos G, Tzimas G, Babis G, Wong GKC, Cross GWV, Micha G, Chrysovitsiotis G, Koukoulis G, Peros G, Tsoulfas G, Kapetanios G, Karagiannidis G, Verras GI, Ekwen G, Perrotta G, Petruzzi G, Bertelli G, Calini G, Fiacchini G, Pirola GM, Dolci G, Mendiola G, Baiocchi GL, Palini GM, Prucher GM, D'andrea G, Maggiore G, Cassese G, Franceschini G, Pellino G, Saponaro G, Pattacini GC, Pantuso G, Iannella G, Bonsaana GB, Lever G, Brachini G, Giraudo G, Lisi G, Russo GI, Aprea G, Pascale G, Tomasicchio G, Sandri GBL, Armatura G, Turri G, Zaccaria G, Barugola G, Lantone G, Gasparini G, Iacob G, Sozzi G, Zancana G, Mercante G, Bianco G, Brisinda G, Consorti G, Currò G, Giannaccare G, Palomba G, Pascarella G, Rotunno G, Spriano G, Vizzielli G, Cucinella G, Sica G, Campisi G, Baiocchi G, Guerra GR, Pacheco GMF, Atis G, Augustin G, Šantak G, Chauhan GS, Branagan G, Harris G, Stewart GD, Padmore G, Kocher GJ, Di Franco G, De Jesus Labrador Hernandez G, Christodoulidis G, Neal-Smith G, Yim G, Piozzi GN, Claret G, Yanowsky-Reyes G, Dhaity GD, Cakmak GK, Mohamed G, Kucuk GO, Ancans G, Banipal GS, De Bacco Marangon G, Laporte G, Martinez-Mier G, Recinos G, V GMM, Benshetrit G, Vijgen G, Pickett G, Rodriguez HA, Shiwani H, Derilo H, Awad H, El Assaad H, Raji HO, Hardgrave H, Karakullukcu HK, Abdussalam HO, Mustafa H, Parwaiz H, Khan H, Arbab H, Naga H, Salem H, Ulgur HS, Perez-Chrzanowska H, Greenlee H, Javanmard-Emamghissi H, Lederhuber H, Osman H, Adamou H, Majid HJ, Van Goor H, Spiers HVM, Manesh HF, Mushtaq H, Aljaaly H, Hasan HB, Ahmed HTA, Martinez-Said H, Aguado HJ, Consani H, Chaplin H, Mohan H, Van Vliet H, Lohse HAS, Shah H, Claireaux H, Lule H, Juara H, Abozied H, Bayo HL, Alibrahim H, Kroon HM, Ulman H, Khan H, Yonekura H, Abou-Taleb H, Wong HYF, Carpenter H, Majd HS, Zenha H, Mayer HF, Elghadban H, Abdou H, Elfeki H, Yusefi H, Gomez-Fernandez H, Horsfall HL, Meleiro H, Sungurtekin H, Junior HFL, Moloo H, Bayhan H, Şevi̇k H, Embarek H, Hamid HKS, Pradeep IHDS, Donkin I, Ateca IV, Jafarov I, Salisu I, Abdalaal I, Garzali IU, Sall I, Adebara I, Aghadi I, Ugwu I, Zapardiel I, Reis I, Nwafor I, Fakhradiyev I, Surya IU, Robo I, Njokanma I, Iannone I, Khan I, Correia I, Königsrainer I, Seiwerth I, Linero IB, Kadiri I, Florian IA, Tzima I, Akrida I, Baloyiannis I, Gerogiannis I, Katsaros I, Tsakiridis I, Valioulis I, Negoi I, Yadev I, De Haro Jorge I, Vázquez IO, Dajti I, Russo IS, Afzal I, Wasserman I, Chukwu I, Gracia I, Oliver IM, Hughes I, Mondi I, Ncogoza I, Bsisu I, Rashid I, Balasubramanian I, Omar I, Dominguez-Rosado I, Smati I, Vokshi I, Al-Badawi IA, Saleh IA, Pilkington I, Kirac I, Trostchansky I, Gawron IM, Trebol J, Martellucci J, Andreuccetti J, Abou-Khalil J, Shah J, Manickavasagam J, De Alarcón JR, Mihanovic J, O'riordan J, Archer J, Ashcroft J, Blair J, Hamill J, Munthali J, Park J, Parry J, Ryan J, Tomlinson J, Wheeler J, Wilkins J, Balogun JA, Hodgetts JM, Vatish J, Žatecký J, Dziakova J, Martin J, Beatty JW, Stijns J, Faiz J, Ripollés-Melchor J, Mata J, Vásquez JAG, Mitra JK, Tuech JJ, Mvukiyehe JP, Fallah JM, Díaz JT, Vishnoi JR, Van Den Eynde J, Rickard J, Rolinger J, Kaplowitz J, Meyer J, Reid J, Rossaak J, Smelt J, Thomas JJ, Reyes JAS, Davies J, Luc J, Alonso JAM, Hajiioannou J, Querney J, Van Acker J, Pu JJ, Cama J, Simoes J, Cozens J, Barbosa-Breda J, Ribeiro J, De Haro J, Nigh J, Bowen J, Pollok JM, Strotmann JJ, Doerner J, Edwards J, Green J, Massoud J, Mcgrath J, Squiers J, Street J, Windsor J, Santoshi JA, Meara JG, Abebrese JT, Reilly JJ, Zabaleta J, Phillips J, Herron J, Horsnell J, Dawson J, Sheen J, Kauppila JH, Konsten J, Raurich-Leandro J, Romera JS, Nuñez J, Gass JM, Blanco J, Calvache JA, Iturralde JLF, D’addino JL, Hermosa JMG, Guillen JRO, Beristain-Hernandez JL, Sole-Sedeno JM, Vives JMM, Attwood J, Furey J, Hadaya J, Mckay J, Meilak J, Natale J, Shalhoub J, Jung J, Arthur J, Kealey J, Wright J, Moreau J, Miskovic J, Juloski J, Bauset JCC, Segura-Sampedro JJ, Cisneros JRT, Gomez-Rosado JC, Arneja J, Heider J, Fernández JD, Plata-Bello J, Villanueva J, Olaogun J, Hing JX, Košir JA, Daruwalla J, Yeung J, Wormald J, Seyi-Olajide J, Rani J, Wong KY, Hristova K, Kajal K, Algarni K, Theivendran K, Futaba K, Elsayem K, Kapur K, Bailey K, El-Boghdadly K, Ataya K, Lacorbiniere K, Shah K, Tellez KSM, Szyluk K, Rangasamy K, Iyengar K, Szabómihályová K, Atkinson K, Camargo-Parra K, Galliard K, Dickson K, Singh K, Qader K, Hasan K, Spellar K, Feeney K, Ajenifuja K, Oh KE, Okunade K, Adanu K, Bateman K, Saracoglu K, Ho KW, Enwerem K, Mishra K, Verhoeff K, Bensoltane K, Larabi K, Hamdan KH, Nadi K, Fozo K, Abdelwahab K, Al-Sayaghi K, Dajani K, Algahtany K, Abdel-Galil K, Ahmed K, Bajunaid K, Bhatti K, Sofi K, Abdulsalam K, Tamoos K, Dzhumabaev K, Samo KA, Purich K, Madhvani K, Qin KR, Underwood K, Senanayake KJ, Augestad KM, Sigamoney K, Apostolou K, Bouchagier K, Bouliaris K, Bramis K, Gousias K, Lasithiotakis K, Paraskevopoulos K, Perivoliotis K, Roditis K, Stamatis K, Stroumpoulis K, Paraskevas KI, Govindarajan KK, Šimko K, Olson KA, Khobragade K, Seah KM, Kishore K, Ayad K, Papavasiliou K, Angelou K, Paniagua LC, Czako L, Ching LVK, Rai L, Gupta L, Ismail L, Mbodi L, Dasanayake L, Schröder L, Baiyewu LA, Fortuna L, Fernandez LG, Vivancos LG, Jack L, Keçi L, Lavalle L, Leonard L, Shelmerdine L, Vaassen L, Hasan L, Lazarou L, Tzelves L, Matos L, Siragusa L, Licari L, Lima LS, Solaini L, Lichman L, Moral LT, Cabeza L, Kaplan L, Valeanu L, Kaman L, Karout L, Pieteris L, Chan L, Grüßer L, Zamora L, Catarzi L, Rampersad L, Anyanwu LJ, Cheung LK, Rodríguez LV, Andreani L, Cobianchi L, Petagna L, Howse L, Gonzalez LE, Bains L, Vohra L, Ansaloni L, Bertolaccini L, Ferrario L, Orecchia L, Tirloni L, Zanin L, Morelli L, Scaravilli L, Locatello LG, García LD, Vida L, Carbone L, Heindl LM, Bonavina L, Conti L, Marano L, Verre L, Conte LE, Boccalatte L, Tellez LGS, Loureiro L, Sánchez-Guillén L, Tallon-Aguilar L, Nakano L, Alvarez-Lozada LA, Gonzalez LAS, Flórez LJG, Capitan-Morales LC, Kowalski LP, Widmer LW, Harper L, Render L, Wheldon L, Abdur-Rahman L, Doğan L, Prusty L, Katsiaras L, Gourbault L, Siddiqui MT, Saleh M, Karthigeyan M, Rodriguez M, Chowdhury M, Nagappa M, Sultania M, Bashir M, Alam M, Elshahawy MAM, Elfiky M, Loubani M, Marei M, Mewafy M, Alali M, Nassar MA, Alobied M, Bilfaqirah M, Ahmad M, Rius M, Manangi M, Dornseifer MD, Tripathi M, S M, Sokolov M, Pigeolet M, Alonso MD, Losada M, Carretero MM, Tousidonis M, Cotovio MD, Wijeyaratne M, Boira MA, Franza M, Albdour M, Alkhatieb M, Déserts MDD, Niewiera M, Vallve-Bernal M, Kavanagh MM, Migliore M, Calabrò M, Martino MD, Reicher M, Baia M, Caricato M, Clementi M, De Zuanni M, Fiore M, Giacometti M, Inama M, Maestri M, Materazzo M, Sparavigna M, Pascale MM, Nemeth M, Serra M, Fahim MMF, Soucheiron MC, Papadoliopoulou M, Wittmann M, Sotiropoulou M, García-Conde M, Ranucci MC, Amo MDAD, Boedo MJM, Velázquez MJM, Pissaridou MK, Petersen ML, Sacras ML, Modolo MM, Caubet MM, Di Nuzzo MM, Ntalouka MP, Menna MP, Aguilera-Arevalo ML, Rela M, Capuano M, Hollyman M, Olivos M, Sacdalan MD, Raphael MC, Takkenberg M, Bortul M, Cabrera M, Castaño M, D'oria M, Giuffrida M, Laborde MM, Rodriguez-Lopez M, Trejo-Avila M, Papa MV, Ghobrial M, Kryzauskas M, Anwer M, Cheetham M, Davies M, Higgins M, Siboe M, Tarle M, Velten M, Wurm M, Süleyman M, Bauer M, O’dwyer M, Caretto M, De La Rosa-Estadella M, Fragoso M, Serra ML, Merayo M, Golet MR, Martínez-Sánchez MI, Domingo MMA, Gosselink M, Batstone M, Reichert M, Salö M, Soljic M, Zambon M, Angeles MA, Abdulkhaleq M, Abdelkarim M, Alsefri M, Iwasaki M, Shiota M, Veroux M, Molina-Corbacho M, Frasson M, Serenari M, De Pastena M, Desio M, Risaliti M, Rottoli M, Bence M, Chan M, Watson M, Wiles M, Boisson M, Berselli M, Capobianco M, Di Bartolomeo M, Fehervari M, Pacilli M, Romano M, Zizzo M, Domanin M, Montuori M, Podda M, Zago M, Dzogbefia M, Frountzas M, Thaw MH, Al-Juaifari M, Gharat M, Mohamed M, Hannan MJ, Venketeswaran M, Chisthi M, Dessalegn M, Kaplan M, Çakıcı MÇ, Ulutaş ME, Hassan M, Elsadek M, Mengesha MG, Gómez ME, Elbadawy MA, Pitcher M, Tanal M, Tokocin M, Ergenç M, Çelik MN, Bareka M, Pekcici MR, Cappuccio M, Dasa M, Dewan M, El Boghdady M, Ezeanochie M, Greenhalgh M, Jenkinson M, Kelly M, Spartalis M, Zyskowski M, Racine M, De Cillia M, Chu MJJ, Mallmann MR, Zhu MZL, Klimovskij M, Vailas M, Kisielewski M, Adamina M, Campanelli M, Carvello M, Ammendola M, Manigrasso M, Scopelliti M, White M, Collins ML, Chevallay M, Borges MF, Mayo-Yáñez M, Melo MR, Ruiz-Marín M, Eiras MAF, Cunha MF, Pertea M, Slavchev M, Davidescu M, Prieto M, Agapov M, Gahwagi M, Prats MC, Rudic M, Verbic MS, Kostusiak M, Stoleriu MG, Lucas MA, Barone M, Ahmad M, Alemu MAA, Fatima M, Ida M, Sahu M, Muhaisen M, Salem M, Emara MM, Oludara M, Sotudeh M, Kassab MB, Abdelkhalek M, Alsori M, Anwar M, El-Kassas M, Elbahnasawy M, Eldabaa M, Rabie M, Hassanin MA, Thaha MA, Ali MSM, Alhamid M, Almoshantaf MB, Keramati MR, Bafaquh M, Abuzaid M, Al-Shehari M, Alharthi M, Alkahlan M, Alwash M, Alyousef M, Amir M, Basendowah M, Deputy M, Jibreel M, Alam MS, Alsharif M, Issahalq MD, Omer MEA, Abubakar MK, Draman MR, Elnour MAE, Eltayeb M, Castillo MN, Jawad M, Raut M, Ghalleb M, Katsura M, Lebe M, Abbas M, Abdelrahman M, Shalaby M, Farhan-Alanie M, Farooq M, Musadaq M, Arshad M, Anjum MA, Usman M, Chaudhary MA, Raza MA, Karim MFSA, Chaudhary MH, Janjua MH, Khokhar MI, Malik MIK, Pirzada MT, Younis MU, Elhadi M, Suer MS, Ergenç M, Binnawara M, Emmanuel M, Abbasi M, Naimzada MD, Kulimbet M, Kusunoki M, Eugene M, Chauhan M, Shokor MA, Aljiffry M, Kalın M, Kurawa M, Dincer MB, Tolani MA, Soytas M, Yakubu M, Usman MI, Aremu M, Paranyak M, Talat N, Kausar N, Dudi-Venkata N, Bazzi N, Hasan NB, Van Wyk NN, Shaban N, Almgla N, Kandevani NY, Alzerwi N, Alvarez N, Motas N, Rincón NAR, Blencowe N, Simon N, Aghtarafi N, Ghuman NK, Sharma N, Wijekoon N, Kumar N, Hassan N, Onyemaechi N, Prijović N, Özçay N, Goel N, Segaren N, Sharma N, Kalyva N, Palacios NM, Alonso NFP, Onyeagwara N, Petrucciani N, Daddi N, Lightfoot N, Power N, Segaren N, Starr N, Dreger NM, Cillara N, Colucci N, Eardley N, Tartaglia N, Zanini N, Bacalbasa N, Campuzano N, Mouawad N, Federico NSP, Tamini N, Mariani NM, Beasley N, Adu-Aryee NA, Burlov N, Dimitrokallis N, Gouvas N, Machairas N, Memos N, Thomakos N, Tsakiridis N, Schizas N, Börner N, Theochari N, Al-Saadi N, Glass N, Horesh N, R NE, Gahlot N, Ismail N, Aljirdabi N, Maria NUH, Trabulsi N, Akeel N, Borges N, Moda N, Redondo NV, Nyarko OO, Ginghina O, Enciu O, Okere O, Ekwunife OH, Quadri O, Ogundoyin O, Tucker O, Mateo-Sierra O, Azzis O, Ojewuyi O, Habeeb O, Idowu O, Elebute O, Agboola O, Ladipo-Ajayi O, Oyinloye O, Adebola O, Ekor O, Ogundoyin O, Salamanca O, Vergara-Fernandez O, Wafi O, Aladawi O, Bahassan OM, Tammo Ö, Ozkan OF, Williams OM, Salami O, Akinajo O, Sakhov O, Gallo O, Sole OM, Milella O, Alser O, Bettar OA, Alomar O, Osman OS, Aisuodionoe-Shadrach O, Basnayake O, Bozbiyik O, Hodges O, Ojo O, Yanık Ö, Mutlu ÖPZ, Kazan O, Calavia P, García PR, Urriza PV, Lopez PR, Christidis P, Dorovinis P, Kokoropoulos P, Mourmouris P, Papatheodorou P, Garg PK, Patel P, Vassiliu P, Campennì P, De Nardi P, Bernante P, Ubiali P, Baroffio P, Pizzini P, Sapienza P, Myrelid P, Chatzikomnitsa P, Tsiantoula P, Gada P, Avella P, Cianci P, Romero P, Méndez PS, Pazmiño PAF, Coughlin P, Kirchweger P, Pessaux P, Maguire PJ, Petrone P, Cullis P, Köglberger P, Marriott P, Nankivell P, Santos-Costa P, Martins PN, Panahi P, Botelho P, Teixeira P, Escobar P, Vázquez PJG, Gribnev P, Nolte P, Agbonrofo P, Bobak P, Choong P, Elbe P, Hutchinson P, Labib P, Paal P, Pockney P, Reemst P, Szatmary P, Vaughan-Shaw PG, Alexander P, Pucher P, Stather P, Foessleitner P, Winnand P, Zehnder P, Kruse P, Matos PAW, Lapolla P, Cicerchia PM, Solli P, Di Lascio P, Zarif P, Champagne PO, Anoldo P, Bertoglio P, Fransvea P, Familiari P, Lombardi PM, Stogowski PT, Bruzzaniti P, Tripathi P, D'sa P, Salunke P, Shah PA, Punjabi PPP, Christodoulou P, Hamdan Q, Tawalbeh R, Gadelkareem R, Awad R, Callcut R, Clegg R, Choron R, Payne R, Gefen R, Costea R, Drasovean R, Mirica RM, Ravindra R, Fajardo RT, Nunes RL, Aspide R, Lombardi R, Vidya R, Elboraei R, Saaid R, Ghodke R, Gupta R, Sharma RD, Lunevicius R, Kalayarasan R, Mohan R, Singh R, Sivaprakasam R, Seenivasagam RK, Rajendram R, Radulescu RB, Goicea R, Seshadri RA, Sarı R, Nataraja R, Aslam R, Abdelemam R, Shrestha R, Bharathan R, Pellini R, Guevara R, Agarwal R, Vissapragada R, Alharmi RA, Sayyed R, Browning R, Critchley R, Mallick R, Alarabi R, Beron RI, Függer R, Othman R, Saad R, Amores RR, Colombari RC, Radivojević RC, Patrone R, Novysedlák R, Palacios Huatuco RM, Baertschiger R, Liang R, Luckwell R, Escrevente R, Rezende RF, Cruz RP, Lenzi R, Rosati R, Donovan R, Egan R, Morris R, Page R, Seglenieks R, Unsworth R, Wilkin R, Skipworth RJ, Davies RJ, Bezirci R, Talwar R, Azami R, Bohmer R, Crichton R, Fruscio R, Hooker R, Jach R, Parker R, Pillerstorff R, Sinnerton R, Stabler R, O'connell RM, Ragozzino R, Tutino R, Angelico R, Cammarata R, Colasanti R, Macchiavello R, Peltrini R, Pirrello R, Vaschetti R, Pires RE, Papalia R, Arrangoiz R, Hompes R, Mittal R, Salah R, Pinto R, Flumignan R, Callan R, Cuthbert R, Dennis R, Scaramuzzo R, Macías RM, Sánchez R, Ogu R, Ramely R, Sgarzani R, Ramli R, Hillier R, Thumbadoo R, Ooi R, Abdus-Salam R, Masri R, Hodgson R, Mathew R, Wade R, D'archi S, Khan S, Ngaserin S, Kale S, Hassan S, Merghani S, Benamar S, Muhammad S, Badran S, Elsahli S, Heta S, Hammouche S, Baeesa S, Paiella S, Eldeen STEHT, Arkani S, Mittal S, Hirji S, Tebha S, Emile S, Dbouk S, Bandyopadhyay SK, Muhammad S, Olori S, Asirifi SA, Hailu S, Ling S, Newman S, Ross S, Wanjara S, Kumar S, Seneviratne S, Tamburello S, Suarez SB, Ingallinella S, Irshaidat S, Konswa S, Mambrilla S, Nasser S, Parini S, Pitoni S, Ornaghi S, Rodrigues SC, Abdelmohsen S, Aitken S, Tian S, Badiani S, Ahmad S, Swed S, Muthu S, Lakpriya S, Alzahrani S, Mikalauskas S, Lasrado S, Satoskar S, Bawa S, Altiner S, Garcia S, Stevens S, Demir S, Ken-Amoah S, Tranca S, Ziemann S, Awad S, Atici SD, Subramaniam S, Erel S, Jiang S, Efetov S, Efremov S, Katorkin S, Valladares SC, Contreras SM, Meriç S, Zenger S, Safi S, Leventoğlu S, Elsalhawy S, Shaikh S, Sheik S, Islam S, Shamim S, Waqar SH, Ahmad S, Farid S, Seraj SS, Sundarraju S, Karandikar S, Sambhwani S, Chopra S, Chowdhury S, Laura S, Ahmed S, Wason S, Tan SJH, Fraser S, Williams S, Ghozy S, Abdelmawgoud S, Shehata S, Sharma S, Ahmed S, Al-Touny SA, Ramzanali S, Nah SA, Jansen S, Rajan S, Dindyal S, Amin S, Ahmad S, Shoukrie SIM, Karar S, Patkar S, Abdulsalam S, Lin S, Hegde S, Fiorelli S, Quaresima S, Redondo SV, Palmisano S, Ruggiero S, Balogun S, Cais S, Cole S, Federer S, Le Roux S, Ippoliti S, Meneghini S, Viola S, Manfredelli S, Novello S, Gananadha S, Mesli SN, Kale S, Tani SI, Malik S, Anastasiadou S, Boligo S, Esposito S, Valanci S, Xenaki S, Pejkova S, Bandyopadhyay S, Trungu S, Basu S, Alkhatib S, Pérez-Bertólez S, Flores SL, Donoghue S, Lunca S, Orsoo S, Potamianos S, Devarakonda S, Suresh S, Croghan SM, Turi S, Capella S, Lucchini S, Magnone S, Salizzoni S, Scabini S, Scaringi S, Cioffi SPB, Seyfried S, Degener S, Potten S, Taha-Mehlitz S, Ali S, Angamuthu S, Mcaleer S, Knight SR, White S, Mantziari S, Kykalos S, Goh SK, Chowdhury SP, Ibrahim S, Elzwai S, Bansal S, Tripathy S, Amrayev S, Anwar SL, Banerjee S, Thakar S, Saeed S, Venkatappa SK, Das S, Techapongsatorn S, Dube SK, Lee S, González-Suárez S, Henriques S, Konjevoda S, Gisbertz S, Bravo SL, Mannan S, Bukhari SI, Zafar SN, Batista S, Chin SL, Arif T, Lawal TA, Aktokmakyan TV, Osborn T, Szakmany T, Sztipits T, Triantafyllou T, Valadez TAC, Singh T, Khaliq T, Patel T, Fadalla T, Jichi T, Sammour T, Al-Shaiji T, Naggs T, Barišić T, Nikolouzakis T, Bisgin T, Perra T, Uprak TK, Dagklis T, Liakakos T, Sidiropoulos T, Adjeso TJK, Dölker T, Oung T, Aherne T, Diehl T, Pinkney T, Raymond T, Rhomberg T, Schmitz-Rixen T, Madhuri TK, Lohmann TK, Yeoh T, Zaimis T, Bright T, Vilz TO, Glowka TR, Board T, Hardcastle T, Cohnert T, Mahečić TT, William TG, Klatte T, Abbott T, Watcyn-Jones T, Mendes T, Kulis T, Sečan T, Campagnaro T, Frisoni T, Simoncini T, Violante T, Safranovs TJ, Risteski T, Pang T, Akinyemi T, Yotsov T, Laeke T, Kochiyama T, Sholadoye TT, Alekberli T, Ezomike U, Giustizieri U, Grossi U, Köksoy ÜC, Bork U, Kisser U, Ronellenfitsch U, Saeed U, Bracale U, Jayarajah U, Rauf UHA, Bumbasirevic U, Ferrer UMJ, Ahmed U, Bello UM, Jogiat U, Sadia U, Galandarov V, Narayanan V, Calu V, Bianchi V, Ciniero V, Tonini V, Silvestri V, Vijay V, Dewan V, Lohsiriwat V, Thuduvage V, Mousafeiris V, Dragisic V, Sasireka V, Santric V, Kusuma VRM, Kolli VS, Alonso V, De Simone V, Picotti V, Martínez VM, Panduro-Correa V, Kakotkin V, Angulo VP, Turrado-Rodriguez V, Krishnamoorthy V, Ban VS, Shah V, Maiola V, Giordano V, La Vaccara V, Lizzi V, Papagni V, Schiavone V, Satchithanantham V, Garcia-Virto V, Jimenez V, Kumar V, Shelat V, Bhat V, Sodhai V, Graziadei V, Kutuzov V, Stoyanov V, Oktseloglou V, Flis V, Elhassan WAF, Yang W, Soon WC, Tashkandi W, Al-Khyatt W, Mabood W, Bijou W, Wijenayake W, D W, Krawczyk W, Atkins W, Bolton W, White W, Ceelen W, Vagena X, Gozal Y, Baba YI, Subramani Y, Jansen Y, Mittal Y, Kara Y, Zwain Y, Noureldin Y, Alawneh Y, Aydin Y, Lam YH, Tang Y, Lim Y, Dean Y, Tanas Y, Su YX, Fujimoto Y, Altinel Y, Frolova Y, Oshodi Y, Fadel ZT, Zahid Z, Elahi Z, Djama Z, Zaheen Z, Jawad Z, Demetrashvili Z, Gebremeskel Z, Gudisa Z, Alyami Z, Garoufalia Z, Li Z, Zimak Z, Radin Z, Balogh ZJ. Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries. Br J Surg 2023; 110:804-817. [PMID: 37079880 PMCID: PMC10364528 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. METHODS This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low-middle-income countries. RESULTS In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of 'single-use' consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low-middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high- and low-middle-income countries.
Collapse
|
49
|
Younas A. Uptake of Innovations in Nursing: The Necessity for Implementation Science. Creat Nurs 2023; 29:177-181. [PMID: 37800735 DOI: 10.1177/10784535231195426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Innovations are critical for improving clinical practice and nursing education, and for enhancing learning and practice change for frontline nurses and nursing students. Continuous innovation for delivering safe care and improving patient outcomes is needed. Merely demonstrating the effectiveness of research innovations is not enough to promote their uptake and use in practice. A 2021 study in cancer research reported that moving research into practice takes about 15 years. Implementation science, a systemic process of identifying the most relevant approaches to move research into practice, has emerged as an effective way to bridge the research-practice gap. The purpose of this article is to discuss why and how Implementation Science is necessary to promote the uptake of innovations in clinical and educational practice.
Collapse
|
50
|
Clapham RP, McKinley K, Stone M, Candy MA, Candy P, Carragher M, O'Halloran R. Acute post-stroke aphasia management: An implementation science study protocol using a behavioural approach to support practice change. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2023; 58:968-976. [PMID: 36523127 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence should guide decisions in aphasia practice across the continuum of stroke care; however, evidence-practice gaps persist. This is particularly pertinent in the acute setting where 30% of people with stroke will have aphasia, and speech pathologists experience many challenges implementing evidence-based practice. This has important consequences for people with aphasia and their close others, as well as speech pathologists working in acute settings. AIMS This study protocol details how we will target practice change using a behavioural approach, with the aim of promoting the uptake of synthesized evidence in aphasia management post-stroke in the acute hospital setting. METHODS & PROCEDURES We will conduct a mixed-methods before-and-after study following the Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) framework. Researchers, speech pathologists and people with lived experience of aphasia will collaborate to identify and prioritize practice gaps, and develop and implement changes to clinical practice based on the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel. DISCUSSION This study may provide a template for acute stroke services in how to use an implementation science approach to promote the application of synthesized evidence into routine clinical practice to ensure people with aphasia receive high-quality services. Collaboration among researchers, healthcare providers, people with aphasia and their close others ensures that the identification and targeting of practice gaps are driven by theory, lived experience and the local context. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject Synthesized evidence, such as clinical guidelines and consensus statements, provides the highest level of evidence to inform clinical practice, yet discrepancies between delivered care and evidence remain. This discrepancy is of note in the acute setting where clinicians report many challenges implementing the best available evidence, combined with a high proportion of people with stroke who will have aphasia (30%). There are many reasons why evidence is not put into practice, and efforts to change clinical practice need to consider these barriers when developing interventions. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study protocol details an implementation science approach to affect clinical practice change, informed by a collaboration of key stakeholders (researchers, speech pathologists, and people with aphasia and their close others). Protocol papers that focus on bridging the gap between evidence and practice are uncommon in communication disorders; moreover, explicit prioritization of practice gaps is a critical but often overlooked aspect of promoting evidence-based practice. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This protocol provides insights into how one study site identified and prioritized evidence-practice gaps using a participatory approach. We provide insights into how clinical practice change may occur by describing how we plan to identify priority evidence-practice gaps and develop an intervention to improve the use of aphasia evidence in routine practice. This protocol aims to share an implementation science approach to service improvement that may be replicated across other services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee P Clapham
- Department of Speech Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kathryn McKinley
- Department of Speech Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Marissa Stone
- Department of Speech Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland
| | | | | | - Marcella Carragher
- NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Robyn O'Halloran
- NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|