1
|
Smith MJ, Pellegrini M, Major B, Graco M, Porter S, Kramer S, Sewell K, Salberg S, Chen Z, Mychasiuk R, Lannin NA. Improving physical movement during stroke rehabilitation: investigating associations between sleep measured by wearable actigraphy technology, fatigue, and key biomarkers. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2024; 21:84. [PMID: 38802847 PMCID: PMC11131210 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01380-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleep disturbance and fatigue are common in individuals undergoing inpatient rehabilitation following stroke. Understanding the relationships between sleep, fatigue, motor performance, and key biomarkers of inflammation and neuroplasticity could provide valuable insight into stroke recovery, possibly leading to personalized rehabilitation strategies. This study aimed to investigate the influence of sleep quality on motor function following stroke utilizing wearable technology to obtain objective sleep measurements. Additionally, we aimed to determine if there were relationships between sleep, fatigue, and motor function. Lastly, the study aimed to determine if salivary biomarkers of stress, inflammation, and neuroplasticity were associated with motor function or fatigue post-stroke. METHODS Eighteen individuals who experienced a stroke and were undergoing inpatient rehabilitation participated in a cross-sectional observational study. Following consent, participants completed questionnaires to assess sleep patterns, fatigue, and quality of life. Objective sleep was measured throughout one night using the wearable Philips Actiwatch. Upper limb motor performance was assessed on the following day and saliva was collected for biomarker analysis. Correlation analyses were performed to assess the relationships between variables. RESULTS Participants reported poor sleep quality, frequent awakenings, and difficulties falling asleep following stroke. We identified a significant negative relationship between fatigue severity and both sleep quality (r=-0.539, p = 0.021) and participants experience of awakening from sleep (r=-0.656, p = 0.003). A significant positive relationship was found between grip strength on the non-hemiplegic limb and salivary gene expression of Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor (r = 0.606, p = 0.028), as well as a significant negative relationship between grip strength on the hemiplegic side and salivary gene expression of C-reactive Protein (r=-0.556, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION The findings of this study emphasize the importance of considering sleep quality, fatigue, and biomarkers in stroke rehabilitation to optimize recovery and that interventions may need to be tailored to the individual. Future longitudinal studies are required to explore these relationships over time. Integrating wearable technology for sleep and biomarker analysis can enhance monitoring and prediction of outcomes following stroke, ultimately improving rehabilitation strategies and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine J Smith
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Michael Pellegrini
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Brendan Major
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | | | | | - Sharon Kramer
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Katherine Sewell
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Sabrina Salberg
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Zhibin Chen
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Richelle Mychasiuk
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Natasha A Lannin
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Janowitz HN, Linden DJ. Chronic Treatment with Serotonin Selective Reuptake Inhibitors Does Not Affect Regrowth of Serotonin Axons Following Amphetamine Injury in the Mouse Forebrain. eNeuro 2024; 11:ENEURO.0444-22.2023. [PMID: 38355299 PMCID: PMC10867722 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0444-22.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
A current hypothesis to explain the limited recovery following brain and spinal cord trauma stems from the dogma that neurons in the mammalian central nervous system lack the ability to regenerate their axons after injury. Serotonin (5-HT) neurons in the adult brain are a notable exception in that they can slowly regrow their axons following chemical or mechanical lesions. This process of regrowth occurs without intervention over several months and results in anatomical recovery that approximates the preinjured state. During development, serotonin is a trophic factor, playing a role in both cell survival and axon growth. Additionally, some studies have shown that stroke patients treated after injury with serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) appeared to have improved recovery. To test the hypothesis that serotonin can influence the regrowth of 5-HT axons, mice received a high dose of para-chloroamphetamine (PCA) to induce widespread retrograde degeneration of 5-HT axons. Then, after a short rest period to avoid any interaction with the acute injury phase, SSRIs were administered daily for 6 or 10 weeks. Using immunohistochemistry in 5-HT transporter-GFP BAC transgenic mice, we determined that while PCA led to a rapid initial decrease in total 5-HT axon length in the somatosensory cortex, visual cortex, or area CA1 of the hippocampus, treatment with either fluoxetine or sertraline (two different SSRIs) did not affect the recovery of axon length. These results suggest that chronic SSRI treatment does not affect the regrowth of 5-HT axons and argue against SSRIs as a potential therapy following brain injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley N Janowitz
- Cellular and Molecular Medicine Graduate Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
- The Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
| | - David J Linden
- Cellular and Molecular Medicine Graduate Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karmakar S, Lal G. Role of Serotonergic System in Regulating Brain Tumor-Associated Neuroinflammatory Responses. Methods Mol Biol 2024; 2761:181-207. [PMID: 38427238 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3662-6_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Serotonin signaling regulates wide arrays of both neural and extra-neural functions. Serotonin is also found to affect cancer progression directly as well as indirectly by modulating the immune cells. In the brain, serotonin plays a key role in regulating various functions; disturbance of the normal activities of serotonin leads to various mental illnesses, including the neuroinflammatory response in the central nervous system (CNS). The neuroinflammatory response can be initiated in various psychological illnesses and brain cancer. Serotonergic signaling can impact the functions of both glial as well as the immune cells. It can also affect the tumor immune microenvironment and the inflammatory response associated with brain cancers. Apart from this, many drugs used for treatment of psychological illness are known to modulate serotonergic system and can cross the blood-brain barrier. Understanding the role of serotonergic pathways in regulating neuroinflammatory response and brain cancer will provide a new paradigm in modulating the serotonergic components in treating brain cancer and associated inflammation-induced brain damages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surojit Karmakar
- National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), SPPU Campus, Ganeshkhind, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Girdhari Lal
- National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), SPPU Campus, Ganeshkhind, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie J, Geng X, Fan F, Fu X, He S, Li T. The efficacy of therapies for post-stroke depression in aging: An umbrella review. Front Aging Neurosci 2022; 14:993250. [PMID: 36081895 PMCID: PMC9446482 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.993250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Post-stroke depression (PSD) is a common complication after stroke. PSD is associated with emotional disorders and psychological dependence, which are potential risk factors for stroke recurrence and suicidality. This study aimed to perform an umbrella review of therapies for PSD through a comprehensive literature search. A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science by two independent authors. We examined the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Activities of daily living (ADL), Neurologic function as efficacy endpoints, and the incidence of adverse events as safety profiles. Seventeen eligible studies, including 267 clinical trials were included in this study. The results showed that High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (HfrTMS), Acupuncture/EA+conventional treatment, Escitalopram, Modified Sini San, Moxibustion, Xiaoyao Formula, Paroxetine, Chinese herbal medicine, Exercise, Citalopram, and Cognitive behavioral therapy are beneficial for improving the depression symptoms of patients with PSD. HfrTMS and Sertraline may have an impact on slowing the scores of activities of daily living or neurologic function. In addition, Acupuncture/EA+conventional, Escitalopram, Citalopram, Sertraline, and Fluoxetine showed no serious adverse events in PSD patients. Our study demonstrated that 11 treatment methods can effectively improve the condition of PSD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinlu Xie
- Key Laboratory of Vector Biology and Pathogen Control of Zhejiang, School of Medicine, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China
| | - Xiwen Geng
- Experimental Centre, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Fangcheng Fan
- School of Pharmacy, Minzu University of China, Beijing, China
| | - Xuyan Fu
- Key Laboratory of Vector Biology and Pathogen Control of Zhejiang, School of Medicine, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China
| | - Shuaibing He
- Key Laboratory of Vector Biology and Pathogen Control of Zhejiang, School of Medicine, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China,*Correspondence: Shuaibing He
| | - Tao Li
- Key Laboratory of Vector Biology and Pathogen Control of Zhejiang, School of Medicine, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China,Tao Li
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feng RF, Ma R, Wang P, Ji X, Zhang ZX, Li MM, Jiao JW, Guo L. Efficacy of escitalopram for poststroke depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:3304. [PMID: 35228575 PMCID: PMC8885641 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05560-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Depression is very common after stroke, causing multiple sequelae. We aimed to explore the efficacy of escitalopram for poststroke depression (PSD). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinical trials. gov, Wan fang Data (Chinese), VIP (Chinese) and CNKI (Chinese) were retrieved from inception to May 2021. We recruited Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) which met the inclusion criteria in our study. The depression rating scores, the incidence of PSD, adverse events as well as functional outcomes were analyzed. 11 studies and 1374 participants were recruited in our work. The results were depicted: the reduction of depression rating scores was significant in the escitalopram groups and the standard mean difference (SMD) was − 1.25 (P < 0.001), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), − 1.82 to − 0.68; the risk ratio (RR) of the incidence of PSD was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.91; P = 0.007 < 0.05), which was significantly lower in the escitalopram groups; Escitalopram is safe for stroke patients; there was improvement of the motor function. However, in sensitivity analyses, the conclusions of the motor function and the incidence of drowsiness were altered. The study suggests that escitalopram has a potentially effective role compared with control groups and demonstrates escitalopram is safe. However, the results of the motor function and the incidence of drowsiness should be considered carefully and remain to be discussed in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong-Fang Feng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui Ma
- College of Physical Education (Based School), Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, People's Republic of China
| | - Peng Wang
- Department of Basic Medicine, School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, People's Republic of China. .,Zhengzhou University of Industrial Technology, Zhengzhou, 450002, Henan, People's Republic of China. .,Medical School of Huanghe Science and Technology University, Zhengzhou, 450006, Henan, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xu Ji
- Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, 450046, Henan, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen-Xiang Zhang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, People's Republic of China
| | - Meng-Meng Li
- Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450007, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia-Wei Jiao
- Department of Basic Medicine, School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Guo
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stockbridge MD, Fridriksson J, Sen S, Bonilha L, Hillis AE. Protocol for Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia (ELISA): A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0261474. [PMID: 34941929 PMCID: PMC8699636 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In this forthcoming multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, we will investigate the augmentative effects of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, escitalopram, on language therapy in individuals with post-stroke aphasia. We hypothesize that, when combined with language therapy, daily escitalopram will result in greater improvement than placebo in an untrained picture naming task (Philadelphia Naming Test short form) administered one week after the end of language therapy. We also will examine whether escitalopram's effect on language is independent of its effect on depression, varies with lesion location, or is associated with increased functional connectivity within the left hemisphere. Finally, we will examine whether individuals with BDNF met alleles show reduced response to treatment and reduced changes in connectivity. We expect to enroll 88 participants over four years. Participants are given escitalopram or placebo within one week of their stroke for 90 days and receive fifteen 45-minute computer-delivered sessions of language treatment beginning 60 days from the start of drug therapy. Patients then complete a comprehensive assessment of language at one, five, and twenty weeks after the last language therapy session. ELISA is the first randomized, controlled trial evaluating the effect of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor on the improvement of language in people with aphasia undergoing language treatment during the acute to subacute post-stroke period. Trial registration: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03843463.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa D. Stockbridge
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Julius Fridriksson
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Souvik Sen
- Department of Neurology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Leonardo Bonilha
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Argye E. Hillis
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Richter D, Charles James J, Ebert A, Katsanos AH, Mazul-Wach L, Ruland Q, Gold R, Juckel G, Krogias C. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for the Prevention of Post-Stroke Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10245912. [PMID: 34945207 PMCID: PMC8704665 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
There are controversial data on the efficacy and safety profile of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to prevent post-stroke depression (PSD). We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases to identify randomized-controlled trials questioning the use of early SSRI therapy in the post-stroke population and its effect on PSD incidence. We included 6 studies with 6560 participants. We extracted the data on PSD occurrence in association with the treatment arm (SSRI versus placebo), as reported by each study. For safety analysis, we extracted the information on adverse events. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled relative risk estimates. Early SSRI therapy was associated with a significant reduction of PSD occurrence compared to placebo (10.4% versus 13.8%; relative risk: 0.75 [95% CI, 0.66–0.86]; absolute risk reduction: 3.4%). SSRI therapy increases the risk of bone fracture (RR 2.28 [95% CI, 1.58–3.30]) and nausea (RR 2.05 [95% CI, 1.10–3.82]) in the post-stroke population. Considering the risk-benefit ratio of early SSRI therapy in the post-stroke population, future research should identify high-risk patients for PSD to improve the risk-benefit consideration of this therapy for use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Richter
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Josef-Hospital, 44791 Bochum, Germany; (J.C.J.); (L.M.-W.); (Q.R.); (R.G.); (C.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-234-509-0
| | - Jeyanthan Charles James
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Josef-Hospital, 44791 Bochum, Germany; (J.C.J.); (L.M.-W.); (Q.R.); (R.G.); (C.K.)
| | - Andreas Ebert
- Department of Psychiatry, Ruhr-University Bochum, LWL-Klinik, 44791 Bochum, Germany; (A.E.); (G.J.)
| | - Aristeidis H. Katsanos
- Division of Neurology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON L8S 3L8, Canada;
| | - Lisa Mazul-Wach
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Josef-Hospital, 44791 Bochum, Germany; (J.C.J.); (L.M.-W.); (Q.R.); (R.G.); (C.K.)
| | - Quirin Ruland
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Josef-Hospital, 44791 Bochum, Germany; (J.C.J.); (L.M.-W.); (Q.R.); (R.G.); (C.K.)
| | - Ralf Gold
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Josef-Hospital, 44791 Bochum, Germany; (J.C.J.); (L.M.-W.); (Q.R.); (R.G.); (C.K.)
- Medical Faculty, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Georg Juckel
- Department of Psychiatry, Ruhr-University Bochum, LWL-Klinik, 44791 Bochum, Germany; (A.E.); (G.J.)
- Medical Faculty, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Christos Krogias
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Josef-Hospital, 44791 Bochum, Germany; (J.C.J.); (L.M.-W.); (Q.R.); (R.G.); (C.K.)
- Medical Faculty, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Legg LA, Rudberg AS, Hua X, Wu S, Hackett ML, Tilney R, Lindgren L, Kutlubaev MA, Hsieh CF, Barugh AJ, Hankey GJ, Lundström E, Dennis M, Mead GE. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 11:CD009286. [PMID: 34780067 PMCID: PMC8592088 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009286.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) might theoretically reduce post-stroke disability by direct effects on the brain. This Cochrane Review was first published in 2012 and last updated in 2019. OBJECTIVES To determine if SSRIs are more effective than placebo or usual care at improving outcomes in people less than 12 months post-stroke, and to determine whether treatment with SSRIs is associated with adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 7 January 2021), Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL, Issue 7 of 12, 7 January 2021), MEDLINE (1946 to 7 January 2021), Embase (1974 to 7 January 2021), CINAHL (1982 to 7 January 2021), PsycINFO (1985 to 7 January 2021), and AMED (1985 to 7 January 2021). PsycBITE had previously been searched (16 July 2018). We searched clinical trials registers. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting stroke survivors within the first year. The intervention was any SSRI, at any dose, for any period, and for any indication. The comparator was usual care or placebo. Studies reporting at least one of our primary (disability score or independence) or secondary outcomes (impairments, depression, anxiety, quality of life, fatigue, cognition, healthcare cost, death, adverse events and leaving the study early) were included in the meta-analysis. The primary analysis included studies at low risk of bias. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted data on demographics, stroke type and, our pre-specified outcomes, and bias sources. Two review authors independently extracted data. We used mean difference (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) for continuous variables, and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous variables, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed bias risks and applied GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS We identified 76 eligible studies (13,029 participants); 75 provided data at end of treatment, and of these two provided data at follow-up. Thirty-eight required participants to have depression to enter. The duration, drug, and dose varied. Six studies were at low risk of bias across all domains; all six studies did not need participants to have depression to enter, and all used fluoxetine. Of these six studies, there was little to no difference in disability between groups SMD -0.0; 95% CI -0.05 to 0.05; 5 studies, 5436 participants, high-quality evidence) or in independence (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.03; 5 studies, 5926 participants; high-quality evidence) at the end of treatment. In the studies at low risk of bias across all domains, SSRIs slightly reduced the average depression score (SMD 0.14 lower, 95% CI 0.19 lower to 0.08 lower; 4 studies; 5356 participants, high-quality evidence) and there was a slight reduction in the proportion with depression (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86; 3 studies, 5907 participants, high-quality evidence). Cognition was slightly better in the control group (MD -1.22, 95% CI -2.37 to -0.07; 4 studies, 5373 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Only one study (n = 30) reported neurological deficit score (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -1.12 to 0.33; low-quality evidence). SSRIs resulted in little to no difference in motor deficit (SMD 0.03, -0.02 to 0.08; 6 studies, 5518 participants, moderate-quality evidence). SSRIs slightly increased the proportion leaving the study early (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.40; 6 studies, 6090 participants, high-quality evidence). SSRIs slightly increased the outcome of a seizure (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.98; 6 studies, 6080 participants, moderate-quality evidence) and a bone fracture (RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.41; 6 studies, 6080 participants, high-quality evidence). One study at low risk of bias across all domains reported gastrointestinal side effects (RR 1.71, 95% CI 0.33, to 8.83; 1 study, 30 participants). There was no difference in the total number of deaths between SSRI and placebo (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.24; 6 studies, 6090 participants, moderate quality evidence). SSRIs probably result in little to no difference in fatigue (MD -0.06; 95% CI -1.24 to 1.11; 4 studies, 5524 participants, moderate-quality of evidence), nor in quality of life (MD 0.00; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02, 3 studies, 5482 participants, high-quality evidence). When all studies, irrespective of risk of bias, were included, SSRIs reduced disability scores but not the proportion independent. There was insufficient data to perform a meta-analysis of outcomes at end of follow-up. Several small ongoing studies are unlikely to alter conclusions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is high-quality evidence that SSRIs do not make a difference to disability or independence after stroke compared to placebo or usual care, reduced the risk of future depression, increased bone fractures and probably increased seizure risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn A Legg
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Paisley, UK
| | - Ann-Sofie Rudberg
- Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xing Hua
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Simiao Wu
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Maree L Hackett
- Professor, Program Head, Mental Health, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Russel Tilney
- Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Linnea Lindgren
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mansur A Kutlubaev
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, Russian Federation
| | - Cheng-Fang Hsieh
- Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Amanda J Barugh
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Graeme J Hankey
- Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Erik Lundström
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Martin Dennis
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gillian E Mead
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Su N, Wen C, Guo S, Yu Y, Wang C. The Efficacy and Tolerability of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Motor Recovery in Non-depressed Patients After Acute Stroke: A Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol 2021; 12:749322. [PMID: 34744985 PMCID: PMC8564176 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.749322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To explore the efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for motor recovery in non-depressed patients after acute stroke. Methods: According to the predefined retrieval strategy, multiple electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria. The primary efficacy outcome was measured by Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale (FMMS) score and the indicators of tolerability included withdrawal rate and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: 10RCTs were included, the pooled analyses showed patients who received fluoxetine (endpoint: MD = 21.17, 95% CI 14.13-28.21, P < 0.00001; mean change: MD = 16.27, 95% CI 10.05-22.50, P < 0.00001) and citalopram (endpoint: MD = 22.93, 95% CI 11.13-34.73, P = 0.0001; mean change: MD = 24.06, 95% CI 10.47-37.65, P = 0.0005) experienced greater improvement in FMMS score. There was no evident difference in total withdrawal rate (fluoxetine: OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.90-1.27, P = 1.38; citalopram: OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.28, P = 0.71; escitalopram: OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.58-1.28, P = 0.47) between two groups. Besides, the incidence of hyponatremia (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.16-3.50, P = 0.01), seizure (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.03-2.08, P = 0.04) and fracture (OR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.61-3.40, P < 0.00001) in the fluoxetine group was higher than in the placebo group. Conclusions: Fluoxetine and citalopram can promote motor recovery in non-depressed patients with acute stroke, but it is necessary to pay attention to the possible AEs of fluoxetine, such as hyponatremia, seizure and fracture. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42021227452].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Su
- Department of Neurology, Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang, China
| | - Changming Wen
- Department of Neurology, Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang, China
| | - Shiqian Guo
- Department of Neurology, Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Neurology, Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang, China
| | - Chenglin Wang
- Department of Neurology, Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mortensen JK, Andersen G. Safety considerations for prescribing SSRI antidepressants to patients at increased cardiovascular risk. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 21:467-475. [PMID: 34569395 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.1986001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the development of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), a relatively uncomplicated treatment of depression and a safer alternative to tricyclic antidepressants was introduced. Any medical treatment has potential safety risks, however, and these risks should also be considered when prescribing SSRIs. AREAS COVERED The present review focuses on safety considerations when prescribing SSRIs to patients with previous stroke and myocardial infarction, as depression, and the need for antidepressant treatment, is common in these patients. At the same time, patients with stroke and myocardial infarction may be at increased risk of developing adverse events due to higher age, comorbidity, and co-medication. Specifically, the evidence of the risk of QT prolongation and bleeding versus thrombotic events will be discussed in the present review. EXPERT OPINION No medical treatment comes without risk and SSRIs are no exception. Depression, a common complication after vascular events, is a potentially life-threatening condition in itself and relevant and sufficient treatment is imperative. SSRIs are often the first medical treatment choice in the ambulatory setting, also in patients at increased cardiovascular risk. Relevant comorbidity and co-medication, however, should always be taken into account when initiating treatment and when choosing a specific SSRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janne Kaergaard Mortensen
- Dept of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Dept. Of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Grethe Andersen
- Dept of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Dept. Of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Krishnan K, K M, K N, Teja YD, Reddy VS, Raju NS, Rathinam KK. Role of fluoxetine in pharmacological enhancement of motor functions in stroke patients: A randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2021; 23:100800. [PMID: 34278042 PMCID: PMC8264525 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke is the primary cause of disability worldwide, the second most common cause of dementia and the third leading cause of death. Only few studies were conducted to study the role of fluoxetine in motor recovery in either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients with probably less severe paresis. However, the current study evaluates both the effectiveness and safety of fluoxetine in the stroke population with a more severe motor deficit. METHODS Patients who had acute or subacute stroke with hemiparesis and aged between 18 and 80 years with medical research council (MRC) scale score <4 were included in this randomized, Single-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 1:1 ratio to placebo or fluoxetine 20 mg/day orally for 90 days. The primary outcome measures were changes in barthel index, time taken to complete nine hole peg test and number of hand tapping movements in 30 s by the affected limb between baseline, 45th day and 90th day. The secondary outcome measure was evaluation of the drug tolerability. RESULTS A total of 168 patients were assigned to fluoxetine (n = 84) or placebo (n = 84) group. Mean BI score significantly improved at 90th day in fluoxetine group (70.42 ± 10.56) than in placebo group (44.23 ± 8.52). Mean dexterity value decreased significantly at 90th day (2.61 ± 0.81) compared to baseline (3.98 ± 0.53) in fluoxetine group. However higher rate of decrease of mean dexterity value was seen in fluoxetine group when compared to placebo group. Mean number of hands tapping movements in 30 s increased significantly at 90th day (16.33 ± 3.58) compared to baseline (9.83 ± 2.92) in fluoxetine group. Few ADR reported during this study were dizziness, drowsiness and insomnia. CONCLUSION The present study indicates that early prescription of fluoxetine is safe and may enhance motor function in patients presenting with severe motor impairments after stroke. However, the findings of the study should be confirmed in future controlled studies with large sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthickeyan Krishnan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Muthuraj K
- Department of Neurology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Nandhini K
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Yalamanchili Dharma Teja
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Vikrama Simha Reddy
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Neethu Sara Raju
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Kiran Kumar Rathinam
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Meikle CKS, Creeden JF, McCullumsmith C, Worth RG. SSRIs: Applications in inflammatory lung disease and implications for COVID-19. Neuropsychopharmacol Rep 2021; 41:325-335. [PMID: 34254465 PMCID: PMC8411309 DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have anti-inflammatory properties that may have clinical utility in treating severe pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. SSRIs exert anti-inflammatory effects at three mechanistic levels: (a) inhibition of proinflammatory transcription factor activity, including NF-κB and STAT3; (b) downregulation of lung tissue damage and proinflammatory cell recruitment via inhibition of cytokines, including IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and IL-1β; and (c) direct suppression inflammatory cells, including T cells, macrophages, and platelets. These pathways are implicated in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. In this review, we will compare the pathogenesis of lung inflammation in pulmonary diseases including COVID-19, ARDS, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), describe the anti-inflammatory properties of SSRIs, and discuss the applications of SSRIS in treating COVID-19-associated inflammatory lung disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Kyung Sun Meikle
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Justin Fortune Creeden
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Cheryl McCullumsmith
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Randall G Worth
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Role of the nucleus accumbens in functional recovery from spinal cord injury. Neurosci Res 2021; 172:1-6. [PMID: 33895202 DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Post brain damage depression impedes functional recovery. On the other hand, higher motivation facilitates functional recovery after damage to the central nervous system, but the neural mechanism of psychological effects on functional recovery is unclear. The nucleus accumbens (NAcc), a motivation center, has not been considered directly involved in motor function. Recently, it was demonstrated that the NAcc makes a direct contribution to motor performance after spinal cord injury by facilitating motor cortex activity. In this perspective, we first summarize our investigation of role of NAcc in motor control during the recovery course after spinal cord injury, followed by a discussion of the current knowledge regarding the relationship between the recovery and NAcc after neuronal damage.
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu G, Yang X, Xue T, Chen S, Wu X, Yan Z, Wang Z, Wu D, Chen Z, Wang Z. Is Fluoxetine Good for Subacute Stroke? A Meta-Analysis Evidenced From Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Neurol 2021; 12:633781. [PMID: 33828519 PMCID: PMC8019826 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.633781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Fluoxetine is a drug commonly used to treat mental disorders, such as depression and obsessive–compulsive disorder, and some studies have shown that fluoxetine can improve motor and function recovery after stroke. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in the treatment of post-stroke neurological recovery. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were performed to assess the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine for functional and motor recovery in subacute stroke patients up to October 2020. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the data. The risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were analyzed and calculated with a fixed effects model. Results: We pooled 6,788 patients from nine RCTs. The primary endpoint was modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Fluoxetine did not change the proportion of mRS ≤ 2 (P = 0.47). The secondary endpoints were Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale (FMMS), Barthel Index (BI), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Fluoxetine improved the FMMS (P < 0.00001) and BI(P < 0.0001) and showed a tendency of improving NIHSS (P = 0.08). In addition, we found that fluoxetine reduced the rate of new-onset depression (P < 0.0001) and new antidepressants (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In post-stroke treatment, fluoxetine did not improve participants' mRS and NIHSS but improved FMMS and BI. This difference could result from heterogeneities between the trials: different treatment duration, clinical scales sensitivity, patient age, delay of inclusion, and severity of the deficit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangjie Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xingyu Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Tao Xue
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Shujun Chen
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xin Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zeya Yan
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zilan Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Da Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yixing People's Hospital, Yixing, China
| | - Zhouqing Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zhong Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Daubner J, Arshaad MI, Henseler C, Hescheler J, Ehninger D, Broich K, Rawashdeh O, Papazoglou A, Weiergräber M. Pharmacological Neuroenhancement: Current Aspects of Categorization, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Drug Development, Ethics, and Future Perspectives. Neural Plast 2021; 2021:8823383. [PMID: 33519929 PMCID: PMC7817276 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8823383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent pharmacoepidemiologic studies suggest that pharmacological neuroenhancement (pNE) and mood enhancement are globally expanding phenomena with distinctly different regional characteristics. Sociocultural and regulatory aspects, as well as health policies, play a central role in addition to medical care and prescription practices. The users mainly display self-involved motivations related to cognitive enhancement, emotional stability, and adaptivity. Natural stimulants, as well as drugs, represent substance abuse groups. The latter comprise purines, methylxanthines, phenylethylamines, modafinil, nootropics, antidepressants but also benzodiazepines, β-adrenoceptor antagonists, and cannabis. Predominant pharmacodynamic target structures of these substances are the noradrenergic/dopaminergic and cholinergic receptor/transporter systems. Further targets comprise adenosine, serotonin, and glutamate receptors. Meta-analyses of randomized-controlled studies in healthy individuals show no or very limited verifiability of positive effects of pNE on attention, vigilance, learning, and memory. Only some members of the substance abuse groups, i.e., phenylethylamines and modafinil, display positive effects on attention and vigilance that are comparable to caffeinated drinks. However, the development of new antidementia drugs will increase the availability and the potential abuse of pNE. Social education, restrictive regulatory measures, and consistent medical prescription practices are essential to restrict the phenomenon of neuroenhancement with its social, medical, and ethical implications. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the highly dynamic field of pharmacological neuroenhancement and elaborates the dramatic challenges for the medical, sociocultural, and ethical fundaments of society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Daubner
- Experimental Neuropsychopharmacology, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany
| | - Muhammad Imran Arshaad
- Experimental Neuropsychopharmacology, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Henseler
- Experimental Neuropsychopharmacology, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany
| | - Jürgen Hescheler
- Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Dan Ehninger
- Molecular and Cellular Cognition, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, DZNE), Sigmund-Freud-Str. 27, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Karl Broich
- Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany
| | - Oliver Rawashdeh
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Anna Papazoglou
- Experimental Neuropsychopharmacology, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany
| | - Marco Weiergräber
- Experimental Neuropsychopharmacology, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Update to the FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis. Trials 2020; 21:971. [PMID: 33239053 PMCID: PMC7687683 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04875-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Three large trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery (FOCUS (fluoxetine or control under supervision), AFFINITY (the Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recovery) and EFFECTS (Efficacy oF Fluoxetine—a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke)) have been collaboratively designed with the same basic protocol to facilitate an individual patient data analysis (IPDM). The statistical analysis plan for the three individual trials has already been reported in Trials, including a brief description of the IPDM. In this protocol, we describe in detail how we will perform the IPDM. Methods/design Data from EFFECTS and AFFINITY will be transferred securely to the FOCUS statistician, who will perform a one-stage IPDM and a two-stage IPDM. For the one-stage IPDM, data will be combined into a single data set and the same analyses performed as described for the individual trials. For the two-stage IPDM, the results for the three individual trials will be combined using fixed effects meta-analyses. The primary and secondary outcome domains for the IPDM are the same as for individual trials. We will also perform analyses according to several subgroups including country of recruitment, ethnicity and trial. We will also explore the effects of fluoxetine on our primary and secondary outcomes in subgroups defined by combinations of characteristics. We also describe additional research questions that will be addressed using the combined data set, and published subsequently, including predictors of important post-stroke problems such as seizures, low mood and bone fractures. Discussion An IPDM of our three large trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery will allow us to provide the most precise estimates of any risks and benefits of fluoxetine vs placebo, to detect reliably a smaller overall effect size than those detectable by the individual trials, to better determine the effects of fluoxetine vs placebo in subgroups of patients and outcomes and to broaden the generalisability of the results. Also, we may identify differences in treatment effects between studies. Trial registration FOCUS: ISRCTN ISRCTN83290762. Registered on 23 May 2012. EudraCT 2011-005616-29. Registered on 3 February 2012. AFFINITY: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000774921. Registered on 22 July 2011. EFFECTS: ISRCTN ISRCTN13020412. Registered on 19 December 2014. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02683213. Registered on 2 February 2016. EudraCT 2011-006130-16. Registered on 8 August 2014.
Collapse
|
17
|
García-Rudolph A, García-Molina A, Cegarra B, Opisso E, Saurí J, Tormos JM, Bernabeu M. Subacute ischemic stroke rehabilitation outcomes in working-age adults: The role of aphasia in cognitive functional independence. Top Stroke Rehabil 2020; 28:378-389. [PMID: 32967590 DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1818479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND About one-third of adult stroke patients suffer from aphasia when they are discharged from hospital. Aphasia seems to be a negative predictive factor affecting post-stroke functional recovery after rehabilitation, but this association has been scarcely addressed in previous research. OBJECTIVES We aim to evaluate the impact of aphasia in cognitive functional outcomes in working-age first-ever ischemic stroke adults. METHODS Retrospective observational cohort study. One hundred and thirty ischemic (≤ 64 years old) adult stroke patients (43.07% with aphasia) admitted to a rehabilitation center between 2007 and 2019 were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate linear regressions were performed using state-of-the-art variables (stroke severity, gender, age) extending them with potential confounders (e.g. diabetes, medication for depression). The cognitive subtest (C-FIM) of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) at discharge and C-FIM gain were the dependent variables. RESULTS Patients with aphasia (PWA) had lower C-FIM scores at admission and at discharge. No significant differences were observed in relation to C-FIM gain, C-FIM efficiency, C-FIM effectiveness and length of stay (LOS).C-FIM gain was remarkably higher though non-significant (p = .059) in PWA. Regression analysis identifies C-FIM at admission and aphasia as significant predictors of C-FIM at discharge (R2 = 0.72). The same variables plus taking medication for depression predicted C-FIM gain (R2 = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS We identified no significant differences in C-FIM outcomes (gain, efficiency and effectiveness) either in LOS between PWA and patients without aphasia, though C-FIM differences were significant at admission and discharge. Aphasia was a significant predictor of C-FIM gain and C-FIM at discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro García-Rudolph
- Department of Research and Innovation, Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a La UAB, Badalona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació En Ciències de La Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Alberto García-Molina
- Department of Research and Innovation, Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a La UAB, Badalona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació En Ciències de La Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Blanca Cegarra
- Department of Research and Innovation, Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a La UAB, Badalona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació En Ciències de La Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Eloy Opisso
- Department of Research and Innovation, Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a La UAB, Badalona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació En Ciències de La Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Joan Saurí
- Department of Research and Innovation, Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a La UAB, Badalona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació En Ciències de La Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Josep María Tormos
- Department of Research and Innovation, Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a La UAB, Badalona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació En Ciències de La Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Bernabeu
- Department of Research and Innovation, Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a La UAB, Badalona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació En Ciències de La Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Obaid M, Douiri A, Flach C, Prasad V, Marshall I. Can we prevent poststroke cognitive impairment? An umbrella review of risk factors and treatments. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037982. [PMID: 32912953 PMCID: PMC7482478 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cognitive impairment poststroke is progressive. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence evaluating risk factors and the effects of treatments to prevent/improve cognitive function in patients who had a stroke with cognitive impairment. DESIGN Umbrella review. DATA SOURCE Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane and PROSPERO were searched from inception until 11 June 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Published systematic review (SR) that incorporated randomised controlled trials to investigate an intervention to improve poststroke cognitive impairment, or SR of longitudinal observational studies that evaluated the risk factors of this condition. No restrictions were applied. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS From each eligible study, details were recorded by one reviewer in a validated form. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria were used to assess our certainty level of each outcome, and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 to assess quality. RESULTS Altogether, 3464 abstracts were retrieved, 135 full texts were evaluated and 22 SRs were included in the final analysis. From four SRs of observational studies, we found 19 significant associations with postulated risk factors, and those which we determined to be confident about were: atrial fibrillation (3 SRs, 25 original studies); relative risk 3.01 (1.96-4.61), ORs 2.4 (1.7-3.5) and 2.0 (1.4-2.8), leukoaraiosis, multiple and recurrent strokes, ORs 2.5 (1.9-3.4), 2.5 (1.9-3.1) and 2.3 (1.5-3.5), respectively. From 18 SRs of interventional trials, we found that interventions including physical activity or cognitive rehabilitation were enhancing cognitive function, while the certainty of the other interventions was rated low, due to limited methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS This review represents common risk factors related to poststroke cognitive impairment, in particular atrial fibrillation, and points to different interventions that warrant attention in the development of treatment strategies. Physical activity and cognitive rehabilitation interventions showed evidence of enhancing cognitive function; however, we could not recommend a change in practice yet, due to lack of strong evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018096667.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majed Obaid
- Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Community Medicine and Medical Care for Pilgrims, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdel Douiri
- Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Flach
- Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Vibhore Prasad
- Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Iain Marshall
- Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang S, Xu M, Liu ZJ, Feng J, Ma Y. Neuropsychiatric issues after stroke: Clinical significance and therapeutic implications. World J Psychiatry 2020; 10:125-138. [PMID: 32742946 PMCID: PMC7360525 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i6.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
A spectrum of neuropsychiatric disorders is a common complication from stroke. Neuropsychiatric disorders after stroke have negative effects on functional recovery, increasing the rate of mortality and disability of stroke survivors. Given the vital significance of maintaining physical and mental health in stroke patients, neuropsychiatric issues after stroke have raised concerns by clinicians and researchers. This mini-review focuses on the most common non-cognitive functional neuropsychiatric disorders seen after stroke, including depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis, and psychotic disorders. For each condition, the clinical performance, epidemiology, identification of the therapeutic implication, and strategies are reviewed and discussed; the main opinions and perspectives presented here are based on the latest controlled studies, meta-analysis, or updated systematic reviews. In the absence of data from controlled studies, consensus recommendations were provided accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Michael Xu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, International Education School, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Zhi-Jun Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Juan Feng
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yan Ma
- Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
An Integrative Neuro-Psychotherapy Treatment to Foster the Adjustment in Acquired Brain Injury Patients-A Randomized Controlled Study. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9061684. [PMID: 32498240 PMCID: PMC7355481 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjustment disorders (AjD) with depressive symptoms following an acquired brain injury (ABI) is a common phenomenon. Although brain injuries are increasing more and more, research on psychological therapies is comparably scarce. The present study compared, by means of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), a newly developed integrative treatment (Standard PLUS) to a standard neuropsychological treatment (Standard). Primary outcomes were depressive symptoms assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) at post-treatment and 6-month follow-up assessment. In total, 25 patients (80% after a stroke) were randomized to one of the two conditions. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that the two groups did not significantly differ either at post-treatment nor at follow-up assessment regarding depressive symptoms. Both treatments showed large within-group effect sizes on depressive symptoms. Regarding secondary outcomes, patients in the Standard PLUS condition reported more emotion regulation skills at post-assessment than in the control condition. However, this difference was not present anymore at follow-up assessment. Both treatments showed medium to large within-group effects sizes on most measures for patients suffering from an AjD after ABI. More research with larger samples is needed to investigate who profits from which intervention.
Collapse
|
21
|
Dennis M, Forbes J, Graham C, Hackett M, Hankey GJ, House A, Lewis S, Lundström E, Sandercock P, Mead G. Fluoxetine to improve functional outcomes in patients after acute stroke: the FOCUS RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-94. [PMID: 32452356 PMCID: PMC7294394 DOI: 10.3310/hta24220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our Cochrane review of selective serotonin inhibitors for stroke recovery indicated that fluoxetine may improve functional recovery, but the trials were small and most were at high risk of bias. OBJECTIVES The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS) trial tested the hypothesis that fluoxetine improves recovery after stroke. DESIGN The FOCUS trial was a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, individually randomised, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING This trial took place in 103 UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Patients were eligible if they were aged ≥ 18 years, had a clinical stroke diagnosis, with focal neurological deficits, between 2 and 15 days after onset. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly allocated 20 mg of fluoxetine once per day or the matching placebo for 6 months via a web-based system using a minimisation algorithm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale at 6 months. Patients, carers, health-care staff and the trial team were masked to treatment allocation. Outcome was assessed at 6 and 12 months after randomisation. Patients were analysed by their treatment allocation as specified in a published statistical analysis plan. RESULTS Between 10 September 2012 and 31 March 2017, we recruited 3127 patients, 1564 of whom were allocated fluoxetine and 1563 of whom were allocated placebo. The modified Rankin Scale score at 6 months was available for 1553 out of 1564 (99.3%) of those allocated fluoxetine and 1553 out of 1563 (99.4%) of those allocated placebo. The distribution across modified Rankin Scale categories at 6 months was similar in the two groups (common odds ratio adjusted for minimisation variables 0.951, 95% confidence interval 0.839 to 1.079; p = 0.439). Compared with placebo, patients who were allocated fluoxetine were less likely to develop a new episode of depression by 6 months [210 (13.0%) vs. 269 (16.9%), difference -3.78%, 95% confidence interval -1.26% to -6.30%; p = 0.003], but had more bone fractures [45 (2.9%) vs. 23 (1.5%), difference 1.41%, 95% confidence interval 0.38% to 2.43%; p = 0.007]. There were no statistically significant differences in any other recorded events at 6 or 12 months. Health economic analyses showed no differences between groups in health-related quality of life, hospital bed usage or health-care costs. LIMITATIONS Some non-adherence to trial medication, lack of face-to-face assessment of neurological status at follow-up and lack of formal psychiatric diagnosis during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS 20 mg of fluoxetine daily for 6 months after acute stroke did not improve patients' functional outcome but decreased the occurrence of depression and increased the risk of fractures. These data inform decisions about using fluoxetine after stroke to improve functional outcome or to prevent or treat mood disorders. The Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recoverY (AFFINITY) (Australasia/Vietnam) and Efficacy oF Fluoxetine - a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke (EFFECTS) (Sweden) trials recruited an additional 2780 patients and will report their results in 2020. These three trials have an almost identical protocol, which was collaboratively developed. Our planned individual patient data meta-analysis will provide more precise estimates of the effects of fluoxetine after stroke and indicate whether or not effects vary depending on patients' characteristics and health-care setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN83290762. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 22. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. The Stroke Association (reference TSA 2011101) funded the start-up phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Dennis
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John Forbes
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Catriona Graham
- Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Maree Hackett
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Graeme J Hankey
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Allan House
- Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Stephanie Lewis
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Erik Lundström
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter Sandercock
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gillian Mead
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Conroy SK, Brownlowe KB, McAllister TW. Depression Comorbid With Stroke, Traumatic Brain Injury, Parkinson's Disease, and Multiple Sclerosis: Diagnosis and Treatment. FOCUS: JOURNAL OF LIFE LONG LEARNING IN PSYCHIATRY 2020; 18:150-161. [PMID: 33162852 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20200004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Depression is common among patients with neurologic disorders, and it has long been considered more difficult to treat than depression in the general population. In this review, the authors consider challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of depression among patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, and multiple sclerosis. For each disorder, the authors discuss the epidemiology and time course of depression as well as review the physiologic and psychological etiologies of depression. In addition, for each disorder, they review screening tools and diagnostic considerations, including differential diagnosis; discuss etiological factors, both neurobiological and psychological; and assess evidence for various depression treatments, including pharmacologic, psychosocial, and neuromodulatory therapies. The evidence suggests that depression is common among patients with neurologic disorders and that it is crucial for general psychiatrists to provide treatment for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan K Conroy
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Conroy, McAllister); Department of Psychiatry, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus (Brownlowe)
| | - Katherine B Brownlowe
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Conroy, McAllister); Department of Psychiatry, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus (Brownlowe)
| | - Thomas W McAllister
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Conroy, McAllister); Department of Psychiatry, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus (Brownlowe)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Outcomes in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Prospective Observational Pilot Cohort Study. Drugs R D 2020; 19:367-379. [PMID: 31741176 PMCID: PMC6890586 DOI: 10.1007/s40268-019-00287-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy and rehabilitation outcomes, specifically disability and quality of life (QOL), in a real-world setting of multi-ethnic Asian patients with first-ever stroke. Methods In this prospective observational pilot cohort study, we included patients with first-ever stroke admitted to two inpatient rehabilitation centres in Singapore between January and July 2018. Outcomes were measured using Functional Independence Measure (FIM)-motor scale, modified Barthel Index (MBI) and the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 generic (SAQOL-39g) questionnaire. Linear regression was used to assess the association between SSRI therapy and outcomes. Regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results Among 57 patients included for analyses, 38.6% received SSRIs. Although SSRI therapy was significantly associated with gains in MBI (coefficient 11.35; 95% CI 0.21–22.50) and SAQOL-39g overall score (coefficient 0.45; 95% CI 0.05–0.85) based on simple linear regression, no significant association between SSRI therapy and any of the investigated outcomes was found after adjustment for confounders. However, an increase in the mean number of physiotherapy and occupational therapy (PT/OT) sessions per day significantly improved FIM-motor (coefficient 16.86; 95% CI 2.64–31.07) and MBI (coefficient 22.79; 95% CI 2.35–43.23) scores. Conclusion SSRI therapy did not improve disability and QOL in multi-ethnic Asian patients with first-ever stroke undergoing rehabilitation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40268-019-00287-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
24
|
Locatelli M, Padovani A, Pezzini A. Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy With Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:321. [PMID: 32231578 PMCID: PMC7082755 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), is a hereditary small-vessels angiopathy caused by mutations in the NOTCH 3 gene, located on chromosome 19, usually affecting middle-ages adults, whose clinical manifestations include migraine with aura, recurrent strokes, mood disorders, and cognitive impairment leading to dementia and disability. In this review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the disease, focus on the corresponding therapeutic targets, and discuss the most promising treatment strategies currently under investigations. The hypothesis that CADASIL is an appropriate model to explore the pathogenesis of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease is also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Locatelli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pezzini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Depression is a frequent complication of stroke and occurs in approximately one in three surviving patients. Depression worsens the course of post-stroke neurological disorders, enhances the physical helplessness of patients, further reduces their quality of life, significantly decreases the effectiveness of therapeutic and rehabilitation measures and increases the risk of death. Antidepressants eliminate or relieve depressive symptoms, mitigate neurological disorders, improve cognitive functions and the general condition of patients, increase the effectiveness of treatment and rehabilitation, diminish the risk of recurrent stroke and decrease mortality. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the first line antidepressants for post-stroke patients; there is evidence of the effectiveness of other modern antidepressants, as well as tricyclic drugs. Unresolved aspects of this problem that require further well-designed controlled studies include tolerability of antidepressants by patients of late age, the choice of optimal drugs and the duration of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu P Sivolap
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - I V Damulin
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Allida S, Cox KL, Hsieh C, Lang H, House A, Hackett ML. Pharmacological, psychological, and non-invasive brain stimulation interventions for treating depression after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 1:CD003437. [PMID: 31989584 PMCID: PMC6999797 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003437.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is an important morbidity associated with stroke that impacts on recovery yet often undetected or inadequately treated. This is an update and expansion of a Cochrane Review first published in 2004 and updated in 2008. OBJECTIVES Primary objective • To determine whether pharmacological therapy, non-invasive brain stimulation, psychological therapy, or combinations of these interventions reduce the prevalence of diagnosable depression after stroke Secondary objectives • To determine whether pharmacological therapy, non-invasive brain stimulation, psychological therapy, or combinations of these interventions reduce levels of depressive symptoms, improve physical and neurological function and health-related quality of life, and reduce dependency after stroke • To assess the safety of and adherence to such treatments SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Specialised Registers of Cochrane Stroke and Cochrane Depression Anxiety and Neurosis (last searched August 2018), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 1), in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966 to August 2018), Embase (1980 to August 2018), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Alllied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1982 to August 2018), PsycINFO (1967 to August 2018), and Web of Science (2002 to August 2018). We also searched reference lists, clinical trial registers (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) to August 2018; ClinicalTrials.gov to August 2018), and conference proceedings, and we contacted study authors. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing (1) pharmacological interventions with placebo; (2) one of various forms of non-invasive brain stimulation with sham stimulation or usual care; (3) one of various forms of psychological therapy with usual care and/or attention control; (4) pharmacological intervention and various forms of psychological therapy with pharmacological intervention and usual care and/or attention control; (5) non-invasive brain stimulation and pharmacological intervention with pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care; (6) pharmacological intervention and one of various forms of psychological therapy with placebo and psychological therapy; (7) pharmacological intervention and non-invasive brain stimulation with placebo plus non-invasive brain stimulation; (8) non-invasive brain stimulation and one of various forms of psychological therapy versus non-invasive brain stimulation plus usual care and/or attention control; and (9) non-invasive brain stimulation and one of various forms of psychological therapy versus sham brain stimulation or usual care plus psychological therapy, with the intention of treating depression after stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data from all included studies. We calculated mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data, and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed heterogeneity using the I² statistic and certainty of the evidence according to GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We included 49 trials (56 comparisons) with 3342 participants. Data were available for: (1) pharmacological interventions with placebo (with 20 pharmacological comparisons); (2) one of various forms of non-invasive brain stimulation with sham stimulation or usual care (with eight non-invasive brain stimulation comparisons); (3) one of various forms of psychological therapy with usual care and/or attention control (with 16 psychological therapy comparisons); (4) pharmacological intervention and various forms of psychological therapy with pharmacological intervention and usual care and/or attention control (with two comparisons); and (5) non-invasive brain stimulation and pharmacological intervention with pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care (with 10 comparisons). We found no trials for the following comparisons: (6) pharmacological intervention and various forms of psychological therapy interventions versus placebo and psychological therapy; (7) pharmacological intervention and non-invasive brain stimulation versus placebo plus non-invasive brain stimulation; (8) non-invasive brain stimulation and one of various forms of psychological therapy versus non-invasive brain stimulation plus usual care and/or attention control; and (9) non-invasive brain stimulation and one of various forms of psychological therapy versus sham brain stimulation or usual care plus psychological therapy. Treatment effects observed: very low-certainty evidence from eight trials suggests that pharmacological interventions decreased the number of people meeting study criteria for depression (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.88; 1025 participants) at end of treatment, and very low-certainty evidence from six trials suggests that pharmacological interventions decreased the number of people with less than 50% reduction in depression scale scores at end of treatment (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.69; 511 participants) compared to placebo. No trials of non-invasive brain stimulation reported on meeting study criteria for depression at end of treatment. Only one trial of non-invasive brain stimulation reported on the outcome <50% reduction in depression scale scores; thus, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis for this outcome. Very low-certainty evidence from six trials suggests that psychological therapy decreased the number of people meeting the study criteria for depression at end of treatment (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95; 521 participants) compared to usual care/attention control. No trials of combination therapies reported on the number of people meeting the study criteria for depression at end of treatment. Only one trial of combination (non-invasive brain stimulation and pharmacological intervention) therapy reported <50% reduction in depression scale scores at end of treatment. Thus, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis for this outcome. Five trials reported adverse events related to the central nervous system (CNS) and noted significant harm in the pharmacological interventions group (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.15; 488 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Four trials found significant gastrointestinal adverse events in the pharmacological interventions group (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.19; 473 participants; very low-certainty evidence) compared to the placebo group. No significant deaths or adverse events were found in the psychological therapy group compared to the usual care/attention control group. Non-invasive brain stimulation interventions and combination therapies resulted in no deaths. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Very low-certainty evidence suggests that pharmacological or psychological therapies can reduce the prevalence of depression. This very low-certainty evidence suggests that pharmacological therapy, psychological therapy, non-invasive brain stimulation, and combined interventions can reduce depressive symptoms. Pharmacological intervention was associated with adverse events related to the CNS and the gastrointestinal tract. More research is required before recommendations can be made about the routine use of such treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Allida
- The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South WalesMental HealthSydneyNSWAustralia2050
| | - Katherine Laura Cox
- The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South WalesMental HealthSydneyNSWAustralia2050
| | - Cheng‐Fang Hsieh
- Kaohsiung Medical UniversityDivision of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University HospitalKaohsiungTaiwan
| | | | - Allan House
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of LeedsDivision of Psychological and Social MedicineRoom 1090c, Worsley BuildingClarendon WayLeedsUKLS2 9LJ
| | - Maree L Hackett
- The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South WalesMental HealthSydneyNSWAustralia2050
- University of Central LancashireFaculty of Health and WellbeingPreston, LancashireUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Antiplatelet effects of citalopram in patients with ischaemic stroke: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Sci Rep 2019; 9:20048. [PMID: 31882732 PMCID: PMC6934581 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56487-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the effect of SSRI treatment on platelet aggregation in patients with ischaemic stroke and included patients from the randomized double-blind controlled study of citalopram in acute ischaemic stroke (TALOS). Patients on clopidogrel were included 6 months after acute ischaemic stroke. Platelet parameters, including P2Y12 platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow System, were measured at the last day of study treatment and repeated after a 14-day wash-out period. A total of 60 patients were included (n = 32 randomized to citalopram). Platelet aggregation levels did not differ between the citalopram group (mean 116, 95% CI 89 to 143) and the placebo group (mean 136, 95% CI 109 to 163) (On-treatment, p = 0.14). Similarly, there was no significant change in platelet aggregation in the citalopram group from on-treatment to post-treatment (mean difference 2.0; 95% CI -18 to 14). Platelet count, size and turnover were not affected by SSRI treatment. In conclusion, SSRI therapy did not lead to statistically significant inhibition of platelet aggregation in ischaemic stroke patients treated with clopidogrel.
Collapse
|
28
|
Fluoxetine showed no benefit in functional recovery from stroke. Drug Ther Bull 2019; 57:183. [PMID: 31690563 DOI: 10.1136/dtb.2019.000076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
|
29
|
Legg LA, Tilney R, Hsieh C, Wu S, Lundström E, Rudberg A, Kutlubaev MA, Dennis M, Soleimani B, Barugh A, Hackett ML, Hankey GJ, Mead GE. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019:CD009286. [PMID: 31769878 PMCID: PMC6953348 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009286.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke is a major cause of adult disability. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been used for many years to manage depression and other mood disorders after stroke. The 2012 Cochrane Review of SSRIs for stroke recovery demonstrated positive effects on recovery, even in people who were not depressed at randomisation. A large trial of fluoxetine for stroke recovery (fluoxetine versus placebo under supervision) has recently been published, and it is now appropriate to update the evidence. OBJECTIVES To determine if SSRIs are more effective than placebo or usual care at improving outcomes in people less than 12 months post-stroke, and to determine whether treatment with SSRIs is associated with adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 16 July 2018), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL, Issue 7 of 12, July 2018), MEDLINE (1946 to July 2018), Embase (1974 to July 2018), CINAHL (1982 July 2018), PsycINFO (1985 to July 2018), AMED (1985 to July 2018), and PsycBITE March 2012 to July 2018). We also searched grey literature and clinical trials registers. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that recruited ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke survivors at any time within the first year. The intervention was any SSRI, given at any dose, for any period, and for any indication. We excluded drugs with mixed pharmacological effects. The comparator was usual care or placebo. To be included, trials had to collect data on at least one of our primary (disability score or independence) or secondary outcomes (impairments, depression, anxiety, quality of life, fatigue, healthcare cost, death, adverse events and leaving the trial early). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted data on demographics, type of stroke, time since stroke, our primary and secondary outcomes, and sources of bias. Two review authors independently extracted data from each trial. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) to estimate treatment effects for continuous variables, and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous effects, with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed risks of bias and applied GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS We identified a total of 63 eligible trials recruiting 9168 participants, most of which provided data only at end of treatment and not at follow-up. There was a wide age range. About half the trials required participants to have depression to enter the trial. The duration, drug, and dose varied between trials. Only three of the included trials were at low risk of bias across the key 'Risk of bias' domains. A meta-analysis of these three trials found little or no effect of SSRI on either disability score: SMD -0.01 (95% CI -0.09 to 0.06; P = 0.75; 2 studies, 2829 participants; moderate-quality evidence) or independence: RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.09; P = 0.99; 3 studies, 3249 participants; moderate-quality evidence). We downgraded both these outcomes for imprecision. SSRIs reduced the average depression score (SMD 0.11 lower, 0.19 lower to 0.04 lower; 2 trials, 2861 participants; moderate-quality evidence), but there was a higher observed number of gastrointestinal side effects among participants treated with SSRIs compared to placebo (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.00 to 4.76; P = 0.05; 2 studies, 148 participants; moderate-quality evidence), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). For seizures there was no evidence of a substantial difference. When we included all trials in a sensitivity analysis, irrespective of risk of bias, SSRIs appeared to reduce disability scores but not dependence. One large trial (FOCUS) dominated the results. We identified several ongoing trials, including two large trials that together will recruit more than 3000 participants. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found no reliable evidence that SSRIs should be used routinely to promote recovery after stroke. Meta-analysis of the trials at low risk of bias indicate that SSRIs do not improve recovery from stroke. We identified potential improvements in disability only in the analyses which included trials at high risk of bias. A further meta-analysis of large ongoing trials will be required to determine the generalisability of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn A Legg
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health BoardRoyal Alexandra HospitalPaisleyUKPA2 9PN
| | | | - Cheng‐Fang Hsieh
- Kaohsiung Medical UniversityDivision of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University HospitalKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Simiao Wu
- West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of NeurologyChengduChina
| | - Erik Lundström
- Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Neuroscience, NeurologyUppsalaSweden
| | - Ann‐Sofie Rudberg
- Karolinska InstitutetDepartment of Clinical NeurosciencesStockholmSweden
- Danderyd HospitalDepartment of NeurologyDanderydSweden
| | - Mansur A Kutlubaev
- Bashkir State Medical UniversityDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical GeneticsUfaRussian Federation
| | - Martin Dennis
- University of EdinburghCentre for Clinical Brain SciencesEdinburghUK
| | - Babak Soleimani
- Royal Infirmary of EdinburghDepartment of Stroke Medicine51 Little France CrescentEdinburghUKEH16 4SA
- Borders General HospitalDepartment of General MedicineMelroseScotlandUK
| | - Amanda Barugh
- University of EdinburghDepartment of Geriatric MedicineEdinburghUK
| | - Maree L Hackett
- The University of SydneySydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthSydneyNSWAustralia2050
| | - Graeme J Hankey
- The University of Western AustraliaMedical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,6 Verdun StreetNedlandsPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia6009
| | - Gillian E Mead
- University of EdinburghCentre for Clinical Brain SciencesEdinburghUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Efficacy and safety of Sihogayonggolmoryeo-tang (Saikokaryukotsuboreito, Chai-Hu-Jia-Long-Gu-Mu-Li-Tang) for post-stroke depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019; 9:14536. [PMID: 31601868 PMCID: PMC6787092 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51055-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of Sihogayonggolmoryeo-tang (SGYMT), a classical herbal medicine consisting of 11 herbs, for treatment of post-stroke depression (PSD). Thirteen databases were comprehensively searched from their inception dates until July 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using SGYMT as a monotherapy or adjunctive therapy for PSD patients were included. Where appropriate data were available, meta-analysis was performed and presented as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the quality of RCTs using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Jadad scale. The quality of evidence for each main outcome was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Twenty-one RCTs with 1,644 participants were included. In the comparison between the SGYMT and antidepressants groups, the SGYMT group scored significantly lower on both the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) (8 studies; MD −2.08, 95% CI −2.62 to −1.53, I2 = 34%) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (2 studies; MD −0.84, 95% CI −1.40 to −0.29, I2 = 19%), and significantly higher on the Barthel index (3 studies; MD 4.30, 95% CI 2.04 to 6.57, I2 = 66%). Moreover, the SGYMT group was associated with significantly fewer adverse events (6 studies; RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.37, I2 = 0%) than the antidepressants group. In the subgroup analysis, SGYMT treatment consistently reduced HAMD scores within the first 8 weeks of treatment, but thereafter this difference between groups disappeared. Comparisons between SGYMT combined with antidepressants, and antidepressants alone, showed significantly lower scores in the combination group for both HAMD (7 studies; MD = −6.72, 95% CI = −11.42 to −2.01, I2 = 98%) and NIHSS scores (4 studies; MD −3.03, 95% CI −3.60 to −2.45, I2 = 87%). In the subgroup analysis, the reductions of HAMD scores in the SGYMT combined with antidepressants group were consistent within 4 weeks of treatment, but disappeared thereafter. The quality of RCTs was generally low and the quality of evidence evaluated by the GRADE approach was rated mostly “Very low” to “Moderate.” The main causes of low quality ratings were the high risk of bias and imprecision of results. Current evidence suggests that SGYMT, used either as a monotherapy or an adjuvant therapy to antidepressants, might have potential benefits for the treatment of PSD, including short-term reduction of depressive symptoms, improvement of neurological symptoms, and few adverse events. However, since the methodological quality of the included studies was generally low and there were no large placebo trials to ensure reliability, it remains difficult to draw definitive conclusions on this topic. Further well-designed RCTs addressing these shortcomings are needed to confirm our results.
Collapse
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kamal R Mahtani
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Engelter S, Hemkens LG, Speich B, Traenka C. Dopaminergic agents versus control for enhancing stroke recovery and rehabilitation. Hippokratia 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Engelter
- Felix Platter Hospital; University Hospital Basel; University of Basel; University Center of Ageing & Rehabilitation; Stroke Center and Neurology; Department of Clinical Research; Petersgraben 4 Basel Switzerland 4031
| | - Lars G Hemkens
- University of Basel; Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Research; Spitalstrasse 12 Basel Germany CH-4031
| | - Benjamin Speich
- University Hospital Basel and University of Basel; Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Basel Switzerland
| | - Christopher Traenka
- University Hospital and University of Basel; Department of Neurology and Stroke Center; Basel Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Das AS, Regenhardt RW, Feske SK, Gurol ME. Treatment Approaches to Lacunar Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019; 28:2055-2078. [PMID: 31151838 PMCID: PMC7456600 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Lacunar strokes are appropriately named for their ability to cavitate and form ponds or "little lakes" (Latin: lacune -ae meaning pond or pit is a diminutive form of lacus meaning lake). They account for a substantial proportion of both symptomatic and asymptomatic ischemic strokes. In recent years, there have been several advances in the management of large vessel occlusions. New therapies such as non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and left atrial appendage closure have recently been developed to improve stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation; however, the treatment of small vessel disease-related strokes lags frustratingly behind. Since Fisher characterized the lacunar syndromes and associated infarcts in the late 1960s, there have been no therapies specifically targeting lacunar stroke. Unfortunately, many therapeutic agents used for the treatment of ischemic stroke in general offer only a modest benefit in reducing recurrent stroke while adding to the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and systemic bleeding. Escalation of antithrombotic treatments beyond standard single antiplatelet agents has not been effective in long-term lacunar stroke prevention efforts, unequivocally increasing intracerebral hemorrhage risk without providing a significant benefit. In this review, we critically review the available treatments for lacunar stroke based on evidence from clinical trials. For several of the major drugs, we summarize the adverse effects in the context of this unique patient population. We also discuss the role of neuroprotective therapies and neural repair strategies as they may relate to recovery from lacunar stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin S Das
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert W Regenhardt
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven K Feske
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mahmut Edip Gurol
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bonin Pinto C, Morales-Quezada L, de Toledo Piza PV, Zeng D, Saleh Vélez FG, Ferreira IS, Lucena PH, Duarte D, Lopes F, El-Hagrassy MM, Rizzo LV, Camargo EC, Lin DJ, Mazwi N, Wang QM, Black-Schaffer R, Fregni F. Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2019; 33:643-655. [PMID: 31286828 DOI: 10.1177/1545968319860483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background. Although recent evidence has shown a new role of fluoxetine in motor rehabilitation, results are mixed. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with fluoxetine increases upper limb motor function in stroke. Methods. Twenty-seven hemiparetic patients within 2 years of ischemic stroke were randomized into 3 groups: Combined (active rTMS + fluoxetine), Fluoxetine (sham rTMS + fluoxetine), or Placebo (sham rTMS + placebo fluoxetine). Participants received 18 sessions of 1-Hz rTMS in the unaffected primary motor cortex and 90 days of fluoxetine (20 mg/d). Motor function was assessed using Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function (JTHF) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scales. Corticospinal excitability was assessed with TMS. Results. After adjusting for time since stroke, there was significantly greater improvement in JTHF in the combined rTMS + fluoxetine group (mean improvement: -214.33 seconds) than in the placebo (-177.98 seconds, P = 0.005) and fluoxetine (-50.16 seconds, P < 0.001) groups. The fluoxetine group had less improvement than placebo on both scales (respectively, JTHF: -50.16 vs -117.98 seconds, P = 0.038; and FMA: 6.72 vs 15.55 points, P = 0.039), suggesting that fluoxetine possibly had detrimental effects. The unaffected hemisphere showed decreased intracortical inhibition in the combined and fluoxetine groups, and increased intracortical facilitation in the fluoxetine group. This facilitation was negatively correlated with motor function improvement (FMA, r2 = -0.398, P = 0.0395). Conclusion. Combined fluoxetine and rTMS treatment leads to better motor function in stroke than fluoxetine alone and placebo. Moreover, fluoxetine leads to smaller improvements than placebo, and fluoxetine's effects on intracortical facilitation suggest a potential diffuse mechanism that may hinder beneficial plasticity on motor recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camila Bonin Pinto
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,2 University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leon Morales-Quezada
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Polyana Vulcano de Toledo Piza
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,6 Albert Einstein Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Dian Zeng
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,4 University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Isadora Santos Ferreira
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pedro Henrique Lucena
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dante Duarte
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fernanda Lopes
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mirret M El-Hagrassy
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luiz Vicente Rizzo
- 3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erica C Camargo
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David J Lin
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicole Mazwi
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Qing Mei Wang
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,6 Albert Einstein Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil.,7 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Randie Black-Schaffer
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Felipe Fregni
- 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,3 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Glymour MM, Gibbons LE, Gilsanz P, Gross AL, Mez J, Brewster PW, Marden J, Zahodne LB, Nho K, Hamilton J, Li G, Larson EB, Crane PK. Initiation of antidepressant medication and risk of incident stroke: using the Adult Changes in Thought cohort to address time-varying confounding. Ann Epidemiol 2019; 35:42-47.e1. [PMID: 31200987 PMCID: PMC8074509 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Depression strongly predicts stroke incidence, suggesting that treating depression may reduce stroke risk. Antidepressant medications, however, may increase stroke risk via direct pathways. Previous evidence on antidepressant medication and stroke incidence is mixed. We evaluated associations between antidepressant use and incident stroke. METHODS For 2302 Adult Changes in Thought cohort participants with no stroke at study entry, we characterized antidepressant use from pharmacy records, biennial depressive symptoms with a 10-item Centers for Epidemiologic Study-Depression scale, and incident strokes from ICD codes. We used discrete-time survival models with inverse probability weighting to compare stroke risk associated with filling antidepressant prescriptions and by medication category: tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or other. RESULTS Over an average 8.4-year follow-up, 441 incident strokes occurred. Filling antidepressant medications 3+ times versus 0-2 times predicted 35% increased odds of stroke (OR = 1.35; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.66). Use of TCAs was associated with stroke onset (OR per 10 fills = 1.28; CI: 1.04, 1.57), but use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (OR = 0.98; CI: 0.80, 1.20) or other antidepressants (OR = 0.99; CI: 0.67, 1.45) was not. CONCLUSIONS Although patients who received antidepressant medication were at higher risk of stroke, this association appeared specific to TCA prescriptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Maria Glymour
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Laura E Gibbons
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Alden L Gross
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins University Center on Aging and Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jesse Mez
- Alzheimer's Disease and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Paul W Brewster
- Institute on Aging & Lifelong Health and Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria BC
| | | | - Laura B Zahodne
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kwangsik Nho
- Center for Neuroimaging, Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Jamie Hamilton
- The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, New York, NY
| | - Gail Li
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Eric B Larson
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Paul K Crane
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Quinn TJ. Fluoxetine in stroke (FOCUS) trial-reasons to be cheerful about antidepressants in stroke? ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:S131. [PMID: 31576338 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.05.85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Terence J Quinn
- Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Saba L, Balestrieri A, Serra A, Garau R, Politi C, Lucatelli P, Murgia A, Suri JS, Mannelli L. FOCUS trial: results, potentialities and limits. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:S152. [PMID: 31576359 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandra Serra
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Raimondo Garau
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Carola Politi
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Pierleone Lucatelli
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiological Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Murgia
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Blöchl M, Meissner S, Nestler S. Does depression after stroke negatively influence physical disability? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Affect Disord 2019; 247:45-56. [PMID: 30654265 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Revised: 11/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression after stroke is common and has been proposed to negatively affect disability by preventing optimal physical rehabilitation and recovery. However, the nature of this influence remains poorly understood. Here, we synthesise longitudinal studies to examine the hypotheses that depression after stroke (i) hampers physical rehabilitation, (ii) prevents functional improvement during recovery, and (iii) is associated with poor functional outcomes. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases PubMed and Web of Science. A total of 5672 studies were screened; 28 met criteria for inclusion. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Individual studies showed no consistent effects of depression post-stroke on (i) the effectiveness of physical rehabilitation and (ii) functional improvements during recovery. In contrast, random-effects models revealed that (iii) depression after stroke was associated with an increased risk for poor long-term disability (OR: 2.16, 95% CI 1.70-2.77). Overall, the quality of studies was moderate and there was evidence for publication bias. LIMITATIONS The number of included studies was small. There was considerable methodological heterogeneity between studies, prohibiting meta-analyses for all effects of interest. Few studies examined the influence of antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS Depressed stroke patients are generally more disabled. However, depressed mood might not restrict improvements in physical disability during rehabilitation and recovery, although it seems to be linked to a delayed increase in the risk of poor functional outcome. High-quality evidence from longitudinal studies is needed to clarify the precise mechanisms and temporal dynamics underlying these associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Blöchl
- Department for Psychology, University of Leipzig, Germany; International Max Plank Research School: Neuroscience of Communication: Structure, Function, and Plasticity, Leipzig, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jensen MP, Ziff OJ, Banerjee G, Ambler G, Werring DJ. The impact of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the risk of intracranial haemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Stroke J 2019; 4:144-152. [PMID: 31259262 DOI: 10.1177/2396987319827211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Observational studies have suggested increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICrH) in patients receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). We sought to clarify the impact of SSRIs on ICrH, accounting for study methodology. Patients and methods A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library from 1960 to December 2017 identified studies comparing SSRIs with control. The outcomes (first-ever and recurrent ICrH) were meta-analysed using a random effects model. Results Twenty-four observational studies and three randomised trials were available for meta-analysis, totalling 4,844,090 patient-years of follow-up. Those receiving SSRIs were more likely to be female (p = 0.01) and have depression (p < 0.001). Compared to controls, SSRI users had a significantly increased risk of ICrH (relative risk (RR) 1.26, 95%CI 1.11-1.42). Although SSRI use was associated with increased ICrH risk in those without previous ICrH (RR 1.31, 95%CI 1.15-1.48), this was not the case in those with previous ICrH (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.83-1.09). Sensitivity analysis according to the bleeding definition reported demonstrated that although 'haemorrhagic stroke' was associated with SSRIs (RR 1.40, 95%CI 1.13-1.72), intracerebral haemorrhage was not (RR 1.11, 95%CI 0.86-1.42). Additional sensitivity analyses demonstrated a stronger association between SSRIs and ICrH in studies with a high (p < 0.001) compared to low risk of bias (p = 0.09) and with retrospective (p < 0.001) compared to prospective (p=0.31) study designs. Discussion Although SSRIs are associated with an increased risk of ICrH, the association is partly accounted for by important biases and other methodological limitations in the available observational data. Conclusion Our findings suggest there is insufficient high-quality data to advise restriction of SSRIs because of concern regarding ICrH risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie P Jensen
- Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Oliver J Ziff
- Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Gargi Banerjee
- Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | | | - David J Werring
- Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dennis M, Mead G, Forbes J, Graham C, Hackett M, Hankey GJ, House A, Lewis S, Lundström E, Sandercock P, Innes K, Williams C, Drever J, Mcgrath A, Deary A, Fraser R, Anderson R, Walker P, Perry D, Mcgill C, Buchanan D, Chun Y, Dinsmore L, Maschauer E, Barugh A, Mikhail S, Blair G, Hoeritzauer I, Scott M, Fraser G, Lawrence K, Shaw A, Williamson J, Burgess D, Macleod M, Morales D, Sullivan F, Brady M, French R, Van Wijck F, Watkins C, Proudfoot F, Skwarski J, Mcgowan D, Murphy R, Burgess S, Rutherford W, Mccormick K, Buchan R, Macraild A, Paulton R, Fazal A, Taylor P, Parakramawansha R, Hunter N, Perry J, Bamford J, Waugh D, Veraque E, Bedford C, Kambafwile M, Idrovo L, Makawa L, Smalley P, Randall M, Thirugnana-Chandran T, Hassan A, Vowden R, Jackson J, Bhalla A, Rudd A, Tam CK, Birns J, Gibbs C, Lee Carbon L, Cattermole E, Marks K, Cape A, Hurley L, Kullane S, Smyth N, Eglinton C, Wilson J, Giallombardo E, Frith A, Reidy P, Pitt M, Sykes L, Dellafera D, Croome V, Kerwood L, Hancevic M, Narh C, Merritt C, Duffy J, Cooke D, Willson J, Ali A, Naqvi A, Kamara C, Bowler H, Bell S, Jackson T, Harkness K, Stocks K, Duty S, Doyle C, Dunn G, Endean K, Claydon F, Richards E, Howe J, Lindert R, Majid A, Dakin K, Maatouk A, Barron L, Meegada M, Rana P, Nair A, Brighouse-Johnson C, Greig J, Kyu M, Prasad S, Robinson M, Alam I, Mclean B, Greenhalgh L, Ahmed Z, Roffe C, Brammer S, Beardmore C, Finney K, Barry A, Hollinshead P, Grocott J, Maguire H, Natarajan I, Chembala J, Sanyal R, Lijko S, Abano N, Remegoso A, Ferdinand P, Stevens S, Varquez R, Causley C, Butler A, Whitmore P, Stephen C, Carpio R, Hiden J, Muddegowda G, Denic H, Sword J, Curwen R, James M, Mudd P, Hall F, Cageao J, Keenan S, Roughan C, Kingwell H, Hemsley A, Lohan C, Davenport S, Bowring A, Chapter T, Hough M, Strain D, Gupwell K, Miller K, Goff A, Cusack E, Todd S, Partridge R, Jennings G, Thorpe K, Stephenson J, Littlewood K, Barber M, Brodie F, Marshall S, Esson D, Coburn I, Mcinnes C, Ross F, Bowie E, Barcroft H, Withers V, Miller L, Willcoxson P, Donninson M, Evans R, Daniel D, Coyle J, Keeling M, Wanklyn P, Elliott M, Wightman J, Iveson E, Dyer N, Porteous AM, Haritakis M, Ward M, Doughty L, Carr L, O Neill M, Anazodo C, Wood P, Cottrell P, Donne C, Rodriguez R, Mir R, Westmoreland J, Bell J, Emms C, Wright L, Clark Brown P, Bamford E, Stanners A, Carpenter M, Datta P, Davey R, Needle A, Eastwood MJ, Razik FZ, Ghouri I, Bateman G, Archer J, Balasubramanian V, Bowers R, Ball J, Benton L, Jackson L, Ellam J, Norton K, Guyler P, Dowling T, Tysoe S, Harman P, Kundu A, Omodunbi O, Loganathan T, Chandler S, Noor S, Siddiqui A, Siddiqui A, Kunhunny S, Sinha D, Sheppard M, Rashmi S, France E, Orath Prabakaran R, Wilson L, Ropun A, Kelavkar S, Ng KX, Kamuriwo L, Shah S, Mangion D, Constantin C, De Michele Hock L, Hardwick A, Borley J, Markova S, Netherton K, Lawrence T, Fletcher J, Spencer R, Palmer H, Cullen C, Hamill D, Durairaj R, Mellor Z, Fluskey T, Wood D, Keeling A, Hankin V, Peters J, Shackcloth D, Hlaing T, Tangney R, Ewing J, Harrison M, Stevenson S, Sutton V, Soliman M, Hindle J, Watson E, Hewitt C, Borley J, Butler S, Wahishi I, Arif S, Fields A, Sharma J, Brown R, Taylor C, Bell S, Leach S, Patterson C, Khan S, Wilson H, Price J, Ramadan H, Maguire S, Bellfield R, Hooley M, Hamid U, Gaba W, Ghulam R, Masters L, Quinn O, Sekaran L, Tate M, Mohammed N, Bharaj K, Justin F, Pattni R, Alwis L, Sethuraman S, Robinson R, Eldridge L, Mintias S, Chauhan M, Tam CK, Palmones J, Holmes C, Guthrie LB, Osborn M, Ball L, Caine S, Steele A, Murphy P, Devitt N, Leonard J, Patel R, Penwarden I, Dodd E, Holloway A, Baker P, Clarke S, Williams S, Dow L, Wynn-Williams R, Kennedy J, Teal R, Schulz U, Ford G, Mathieson P, Reckless I, Deveciana A, Mccann P, Cluckie G, Howell G, Ayer J, Moynihan B, Ghatala R, Clarke B, Cloud G, Patel B, Khan U, Al-Samarrai N, Trippier S, Chopra N, Adedoyin T, Watson F, Jones V, Zhang L, Choy L, Williams R, Clarke N, Blight A, Kennedy K, Dainty A, Selvarajah J, Kalladka D, Cheripelli B, Smith W, Moreton F, Welch A, Huang X, Douglas E, Lush A, Day N, El Tawil S, Montgomery K, Hamilton H, Ritchie D, Ramachandra S, Mcleish K, Thavanesan K, Loganathan S, Roberts J, Cox C, Orr S, Hogan A, Tiwari D, Hann G, Longland B, David O, Bell J, Ovington C, Rogers E, Bower R, Keltos M, Cohen D, Devine J, Alwis L, Southworth L, Burgess L, Lang M, Badiani B, Guo F, Oshodi A, Owoyele E, Epie N, David A, Mpelembue M, Bathula R, Abdul-Saheb M, Chamberlain A, Sudkeo V, Rashed K, Wood D, Williams-Yesson B, Board J, De Bruijn S, Buckley C, Board S, Allison J, Keeling E, Duckett T, Donaldson D, Vickers C, Barron C, Balian L, Wilson J, Edwards A, England T, Hedstrom A, Bedford E, Harper M, Melikyan E, Abbott W, Subramanian K, Goldsworthy M, Srinivasan M, Yeomans A, Donaldson D, Hurford F, Chapman R, Shahzad S, David O, Motherwell N, Tonks L, Young R, Ghani U, Mukherjee I, Dutta D, Obaid M, Brown P, Davis F, Ward D, Turfrey J, Cartwright B, Topia B, Spurway J, Collins K, Bakawala R, Hughes C, Oconnell S, Hill L, Chatterjee K, Webster T, Haider S, Rushworth P, Macleod F, Nallasivan A, Perkins C, Burns E, Leason S, Carter T, Seagrave S, Sami E, Armstrong L, Naqvi SN, Hassan M, Parkinson S, Mawer S, Darnbrook G, Booth C, Hairsine B, Smith M, Williamson S, Farquhar F, Esisi B, Cassidy T, Mankin G, Mcclelland B, Bokhari M, Sproates D, Epstein E, Hurdowar S, Blackburn R, Sukhdeep N, Razak S, Osman K, Hashmi A, Upton N, Harrington F, Courtauld G, Schofield C, Lucas L, Adie K, Bond K, Mate A, Skewes J, James A, Brodie C, Johnson M, Allsop L, Driver E, Harris K, Drake M, Ellis S, Maund B, Thomas E, Moore K, Burn M, Hamilton A, Mahalingam S, Misra A, Reid F, Benford A, Hilton D, Hazell L, Ofori K, Thomas AL, Mathew M, Dayal S, Burn I, Fotherby K, Jennings-Preece K, Willberry A, Morgan D, Butler D, Sahota G, Kauldhar K, Ahmad N, Stevens A, Das S, Bruce D, Pai Y, Nyo K, Stephenson L, Nendick R, Rogers G, Dhakal M, Dima S, Brown E, Clayton S, Gamble P, Naeem M, Hayman R, Burnip R, Earnshaw P, Hargroves D, Ransom B, Rudenko H, Balogun I, Griffiths K, Mears K, Webb T, Cowie L, Hammond T, Thomson A, Ceccarelli D, Chattha N, Beranova E, Verrion A, Gillian A, Schumacher N, Bahk A, Walker S, Cvoro V, Mccormick K, Chapman N, Pound S, Cain R, Mcauley S, Couser M, Simpson M, Tachtatzis A, Ullah K, Sims D, Jones R, Smith J, Tongue R, Willmot M, Sutton C, Littleton E, Khaira J, Maiden S, Cunningham J, Green C, Chin YM, Bates M, Ahlquist K, Kane I, Breeds J, Sargent T, Latter L, Pitt Ford A, Gainsborough N, Levett T, Thompson P, Barbon E, Dunne A, Hervey S, Ragab S, Sandell T, Dickson C, Dube J, Power S, Evans N, Wadams B, Elitova S, Aubrey B, Garcia T, Mcilmoyle J, Jeffs C, Dickinson C, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Frudd J, Armer C, Potter A, Donaldson S, Howard J, Jones K, Dhar S, Collas D, Sundayi S, Denham L, Oza D, Walker E, Cunningham J, Bhandari M, Ispoglou S, Evans R, Sharobeem K, Walton E, Shanu S, Hayes A, Howard-Brown J, Billingham S, Weir N, Pressly V, Wood E, Sykes L, Howard G, Burton H, Crawford P, Egerton S, Evans S, Hakkak J, Andrews J, Lampard R, Allen C, Walters A, Said R, Marigold JR, Tsang SM, Creeden R, Cox C, Smith S, Gartrell I, Smith F, Jenkins C, Pryor J, Hedges A, Price F, Moseley L, Mercer L, Hughes C, Mcgowan D, Azim A, White J, Krasinska-Chavez M, Chaplin S, Curtis J, Singh D, Imam J, Nicolson A, Alam S, Whitworth S, Wood L, Warburton E, Kelly S, Mcgee J, Markus H, Chandrasena D, Hayden D, Sesay J, Hayhoe H, Bolton M, Macdonald J, Mitchell J, Farron C, Amis E, Day D, Culbert A, Espanol A, Hannon N, Handley D, Finlay S, Crisp S, Whitehead L, Francis J, Oconnell J, Osborne E, Beard R, Krishnamurthy R, Mokoena L, Sattar N, Myint M, Edwards M, Smith A, Corrigan P, Byrne A, Blackburn J, Mcghee C, Smart A, Macleod M, Donaldson F, Copeland C, Wilson J, Scott R, Fitzsimmons P, Lopez P, Wilkinson M, Manoj A, Cox P, Trainor L, Fletcher G, Denny L, Kavanagh K, Allsop H, Emsley H, Sultan S, Mcloughlin A, Walmsley B, Hough L, Ahmed S, Doyle D, Gregary B, Raj S, Nagaratnam K, Mannava N, Haque N, Shields N, Preston K, Mason G, Short K, Lumsdale G, Uitenbosch G, Sukys U, Valentine S, Jarrett D, Dodsworth K, Wands M, Khan N, Tandy J, Watkinson C, Golding W, Butler R, Williams M, Davies Y, Yip K, James C, Suttling A, Maney A, Gamble GE, Hague A, Charles B, Blane S, Duran B, Lambert C, Stagg K, Whiting R, Homan JE, Brown S, Hussain M, Harvey M, Graham L, Foote L, Lane C, Kemp L(J, Rowe J, Durman H, Foot J, Brotherton L, Hunt N, Pawley C, Whitcher A, Sutton P, Mcdonald S, Pak D, Wiltshire A, Jagger J, Metcalf AK, Healey GL, Balami J, Self CM, Crofts M, Chakrabarti A, Hmu C, Ravenhill G, Grimmer C, Soe T, Keshet-Price J, Langley M, Potter I, Tam PL, Macleod MJ, Cooper P, Christie M, Irvine J, Annison F, Christie D, Meneses C, Johnson A, Joyson A, Nelson S, Taylor V, Reid J, Clarke R, Furnace J, Gow H, Abousleiman Y, Beadling T, Collins S, Jones S, Purcell J, Bloom S, Goshawk S, Landicho M, Sangaralingham S, Begum Y, Mutton S, Munuswamy Vaiyapuri E, Allen J, Lowe J, Hughes M, Wiggam I, Cuddy S, Tauro S, Wells B, Mohd Nor A, Eglinton C, Persad N, Kalita M, Weatherby S, Brown C, Pace A, Lashley D, Marner M, Weinling M, Wilmshurst N, Waugh D, Mucha A, Shah A, Baker J, Westcott J, Cowan R, Vasileiadis E, Mumani S, Parry A, Mason C, Holden M, Petrides K, Nishiyama T, Mehta H, Krishnan M, Lynne D, Thomas L, Lynda C, Hughes C, Clements C, Williams R, Anjum T, Sharon S, Tucker S, Jones P, Colwill D, Thompson Jones H, Chadha D, Fairweather M, Walstow D, Fong R, Johnston S, Almadenboyle C, Ross S, Carson S, Nair P, Tenbruck E, Stirling M, Pusalkar A, Beadle H, Chan K, Dangri P, Asokanathan A, Rana A, Gohil S, Massyn M, Aruldoss P, Cook A, Crabtree K, Dabbagh S, Black T, Clarke C, Mead D, Fennelly R, Anthony A, Nardone L, Dimartino V, Tribbeck M, Broughton D, Tryambake D, Dixon L, Skotnicka A, Thompson J, Whitehouse S, Sigsworth A, Wong J, Annamalai A, Pagan J, Affley B, Sunderland C, Goldenberg L, Khan A, Wilkinson P, Nari R, Abbott L, Young E, Shakhon A, Lock S, Stewart J, Pereira R, Dsouza M, Dunn S, Mckenna AM, Cron N, Kidd M, Hull G, Bunworth K, Drummond G, Mahawish K, Hayes N, Connell L, Simpson J, Penney H, Punekar S, Nevinson J, Wareing W, Ward J, Greenwood R, Austin D, Banaras A, Hogan C, Corbett T, Oji N, Elliott E, Brezitski M, Passeron N, Howaniec L, Watchurst C, Patel K, Erande R, Shah R, Sengupta N, Metiu M, Gonzalez C, Funnell S, Margalef J, Peters G, Chadbourn I, Sivakumar R, Saksena R, Ketley-O'donel J, Needle R, Chinery E, Wright A, Cook S, Ngeh J, Proeschel H, Cook P, Ashcroft P, Sharpe S, Jones S, Jenkinson D, Kelly D, Bray H, Gunathilagan G, Griffiths K, Mears K, Gillian A, Jones S, Tilbey S, Abubakar S, Beranova E, Vassallo J, Leonard D, Orrell L, Hasan A, Khan A, Qamar S, Graham S, Hewitt E, Awolesi J, Haque M, Kent A, Bradshaw E, Cooper M, Wynter I, Rajapakse A, Janbieh J, Nasar AM, Wade L, Otter L, Haigh S, Burgoyne JR, Boulton R, Boulton A, Rayessa R, Clarkson E, Rhian H, Fleming A, Mitchelson K, Lowthorpe V, Abdul-Hamid A, Jones P, Duggan C, Hynes A, Nurse E, Raza SA, Jones S, Pallikona U, Edwards B, Morgan G, Dennett K, Tench H, Loosley R, Trugeon-Smith T, Jones R, Williams R, Robson D, Mavinamane S, Meenakshisundaram S, Ranga L, Dealing S, Hill A, Hargreaves M, Smith T, Bate J, Harrison L, Kirthivasan R, Cannon E, Topliffe J, Keskeys R, Williams S, Mcneela F, Cairns F, James T, Lyle A, Shah S, Zachariah G, Fergey L, Smolen S, Cooper L, Bohannan E, Omer S, Amlani S, Hunter N, Hawkes-Blackburn M, Gulli G, Peacocke A, Amero J, Burova M, Speirs O, Levy S, Francis L, Holland S, Brotheridge S, Lyon H, Hare C, Jackson S, Stephenson L, Al Hussayni S, Featherstone J, Bwalya A, Singh A, Goorah MN, Walford J, Bell A, Kelly C, Rusk D, Sutton D, Patel F, Duberley S, Hayes K, Hunt L, El Nour A, Cottrell P, Westmoreland J, Honour S, Box C, Wood P, Haritakis M, Dyer S, Brown L, Elliott K, Temlett E, Paterson J, Furness R, Young S, Orugun E, Brewer C, Thornthwaite S, Crowther H, Glover R, Sein M, Haque K, Gibson E, Wong S, Rotchell K, Burton K, Brookes L, Bailey L, Leonard D, Lindley C, Murray A, Waltho K, Holland M, Kumar P, Harlekar P, Booth L, Culmsee C, Drew J, Khan M, Mackenzie N, Thomas C, Ritchie J, Barker J, Haley M, Cotterill D, Lane L, Little C, Simmons D, Saunders G, Dymond H, Kidd S, Warinton R, Neves-Silva Y, Nevajda B, Villaruel M, Umasankar U, Patel S, Man A, Christmas N, Rangasamy R, Ladner R, Butt G, Alvares W, Gadi N, Power M, Wroath B, Dynan K, Wilson D, Crothers S, Leonard C, Hagan S, Douris G, Vahidassr D, Thompson A, Gallen B, Mckenna S, Edwards C, Mcgoldrick C, Bhattad M, Kawafi K, Morse D, Jacob P, Turner L, Saravanan N, Johnson L, Humphrey S, Namushi R, Patel R, Mclaughlin J, Omahony P, Osikominu E, Orefo C, Mcdonald C, Jones V, Makanju E, Khan T, Appiatse G, Stone H, Augustin M, Wardale A, Salehin M, Bailey D, Garcia-Alen L, Kalathil L, Tinsley S, Jones T, Amor K, Ritchings A, Margerum E, Horton J, Miller R, Gautam N, Meir J, Jones A, Putteril J, Lepore M, Makanju E, Gallifent R, Arundell LL, Mcredmond C, Goulding A, Nadarajan V, Laurence J, Fung Lo S, Melander S, Nicholas P, Woodford E, Mckenzie G, Le V, Crause J, Luder R, Bhargava M, Shah R, Bhome G, Johnson VV, Chesser D, Bridger H, Murali E, Scott J, Morrison S, Burns A, Graham J, Duffy M, Ali K, Sargent T, Pitcher E, Gaylard J, Newman J, Punnoose S, Besley S, Purohit K, Rees A, Davy M, Chohan O, Khan MF, Walker R, Murray V, Bent C, Oakley S, Blight A, Peixoto C, Jones S, Livingstone G, Butler F, Bradfield S, Gordon L, Schmit J, Wijewardane A, Edmunds T, Wills R, Medcalf C, Argandona L, Cuenoud L, Hassan H, Erumere E, Ocallaghan A, Gompertz P, Redjep O, Auld G, Howaniec L, Song A, Tarkas T, Kabash H, Hungwe R. Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 393:265-274. [PMID: 30528472 PMCID: PMC6336936 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32823-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Results of small trials indicate that fluoxetine might improve functional outcomes after stroke. The FOCUS trial aimed to provide a precise estimate of these effects. METHODS FOCUS was a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial done at 103 hospitals in the UK. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, had a clinical stroke diagnosis, were enrolled and randomly assigned between 2 days and 15 days after onset, and had focal neurological deficits. Patients were randomly allocated fluoxetine 20 mg or matching placebo orally once daily for 6 months via a web-based system by use of a minimisation algorithm. The primary outcome was functional status, measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), at 6 months. Patients, carers, health-care staff, and the trial team were masked to treatment allocation. Functional status was assessed at 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. Patients were analysed according to their treatment allocation. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN83290762. FINDINGS Between Sept 10, 2012, and March 31, 2017, 3127 patients were recruited. 1564 patients were allocated fluoxetine and 1563 allocated placebo. mRS data at 6 months were available for 1553 (99·3%) patients in each treatment group. The distribution across mRS categories at 6 months was similar in the fluoxetine and placebo groups (common odds ratio adjusted for minimisation variables 0·951 [95% CI 0·839-1·079]; p=0·439). Patients allocated fluoxetine were less likely than those allocated placebo to develop new depression by 6 months (210 [13·43%] patients vs 269 [17·21%]; difference 3·78% [95% CI 1·26-6·30]; p=0·0033), but they had more bone fractures (45 [2·88%] vs 23 [1·47%]; difference 1·41% [95% CI 0·38-2·43]; p=0·0070). There were no significant differences in any other event at 6 or 12 months. INTERPRETATION Fluoxetine 20 mg given daily for 6 months after acute stroke does not seem to improve functional outcomes. Although the treatment reduced the occurrence of depression, it increased the frequency of bone fractures. These results do not support the routine use of fluoxetine either for the prevention of post-stroke depression or to promote recovery of function. FUNDING UK Stroke Association and NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Collapse
|
41
|
Chollet F, Rigal J, Marque P, Barbieux-Guillot M, Raposo N, Fabry V, Albucher JF, Pariente J, Loubinoux I. Serotonin Selective Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and Stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2018; 18:100. [PMID: 30353288 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-018-0904-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The interest in SSRIs after stroke has increased in the past few years, with better knowledge of post-stroke depression and with the demonstrated capacity of some SSRIs to act on the functional recovery of non-depressed subjects. RECENT FINDINGS Arguments for the action of SSRIs in favour of post-stroke neurological function recovery have improved through new elements: basic science and preclinical data, positive clinical trials and repeated series of stroke patient meta-analysis, and confirmation of favourable safety conditions in post-stroke patients. Global coherence is appearing, showing that SSRIs improve stroke recovery in non-depressed patients when given for 3 months after the stroke, with highly favourable safety conditions and a favourable benefit/risk ratio. Large series are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Chollet
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. .,Toulouse Neuro-Imaging, Inserm, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
| | - J Rigal
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.,Toulouse Neuro-Imaging, Inserm, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - P Marque
- Toulouse Neuro-Imaging, Inserm, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.,Rehabilitation Department, Hôpital de Rangueil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - M Barbieux-Guillot
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.,Toulouse Neuro-Imaging, Inserm, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - N Raposo
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.,Toulouse Neuro-Imaging, Inserm, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - V Fabry
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - J F Albucher
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.,Toulouse Neuro-Imaging, Inserm, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - J Pariente
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.,Toulouse Neuro-Imaging, Inserm, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - I Loubinoux
- Toulouse Neuro-Imaging, Inserm, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mortensen JK, Andersen G. Potential Role of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Improving Functional Outcome after Stroke. CNS Drugs 2018; 32:895-903. [PMID: 30225777 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-018-0573-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The great advances in acute stroke treatment during the last decades have changed life after stroke considerably. However, the use of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy is limited by a relatively narrow time window or contraindications for treatment. Further, patients receiving acute reperfusion therapies may still have cognitive and emotional complications due to underlying brain infarcts even though physical problems may almost disappear. Consequently, stroke is still a frequent cause of adult disability and death worldwide, and an effort to identify additional treatments to enhance recovery, preferably also feasible in the time after the acute phase, is warranted. Albeit several drugs and treatment modalities have been studied for their potential to enhance recovery after stroke, no treatment has unambiguously proven to potentiate the rehabilitation process. A promising candidate for pharmacological treatment is selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), a group of commonly used antidepressants that may also possess neuro-regenerative properties. The current paper reviews the evidence for SSRIs as potential enhancers of stroke recovery and discusses the potential mechanisms behind the effects reported and the implications for the management of patients post-stoke, including potential adverse events and drug-drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grethe Andersen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Johnstone A, Levenstein JM, Hinson EL, Stagg CJ. Neurochemical changes underpinning the development of adjunct therapies in recovery after stroke: A role for GABA? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2018; 38:1564-1583. [PMID: 28929902 PMCID: PMC6125966 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x17727670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, with around three-quarters of stroke survivors experiencing motor problems. Intensive physiotherapy is currently the most effective treatment for post-stroke motor deficits, but much recent research has been targeted at increasing the effects of the intervention by pairing it with a wide variety of adjunct therapies, all of which aim to increase cortical plasticity, and thereby hope to maximize functional outcome. Here, we review the literature describing neurochemical changes underlying plasticity induction following stroke. We discuss methods of assessing neurochemicals in humans, and how these measurements change post-stroke. Motor learning in healthy individuals has been suggested as a model for stroke plasticity, and we discuss the support for this model, and what evidence it provides for neurochemical changes. One converging hypothesis from animal, healthy and stroke studies is the importance of the regulation of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA for the induction of cortical plasticity. We discuss the evidence supporting this hypothesis, before finally summarizing the literature surrounding the use of adjunct therapies such as non-invasive brain stimulation and SSRIs in post-stroke motor recovery, both of which have been show to influence the GABAergic system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainslie Johnstone
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford Centre for FMRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jacob M Levenstein
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford Centre for FMRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Section on Functional Imaging Methods, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institutes of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Emily L Hinson
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford Centre for FMRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Charlotte J Stagg
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford Centre for FMRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are common and avoidable complications that are associated with poor patient outcomes. Neurocritical care patients may be at particular risk for DDIs due to alterations in pharmacokinetic profiles and exposure to medications with a high DDI risk. This review describes the principles of DDI pharmacology, common and severe DDIs in Neurocritical care, and recommendations to minimize adverse outcomes. A review of published literature was performed using PubMed by searching for 'Drug Interaction' and several high DDI risk and common neurocritical care medications. Key medication classes included anticoagulants, antimicrobials, antiepileptics, antihypertensives, sedatives, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Additional literature was also reviewed to determine the risk in neurocritical care and potential therapeutic alternatives. Clinicians should be aware of interactions in this setting, the long-term complications, and therapeutic alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Spoelhof
- Department of Pharmacy, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
| | - Salia Farrokh
- Neurocritical Care, Department of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lucia Rivera-Lara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Post stroke depression: The sequelae of cerebral stroke. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018; 90:104-114. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
46
|
Sun Y, Sun X, Qu H, Zhao S, Xiao T, Zhao C. Neuroplasticity and behavioral effects of fluoxetine after experimental stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2018; 35:457-468. [PMID: 28854520 DOI: 10.3233/rnn-170725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The brain can undergo self-repair and has the ability to compensate for functions lost after a stroke. The plasticity of the ischemic brain is influenced by several factors including aging and pharmacotherapy. Fluoxetine is an antidepressant which enhances serotonergic neurotransmission through selective inhibition of neuronal reuptake of serotonin. In clinical practice, fluoxetine alleviates the symptoms of post-stroke depression (PSD), helps motor recovery in stroke patients. In animal experiments, chronic administration of fluoxetine induces increased excitability of mature granule cells (GCs), enhancing axonal and dendritic reorganization, as well as promoting neurogenesis or angiogenesis in the dentate gurus (DG), but the effect of fluoxetine in the subventricular zone (SVZ) remains controversial. Meanwhile, chronic treatment with fluoxetine did not reverse age-dependent suppression of proliferation cells in the DG. Interestingly, although fluoxetine has been found to enhance neurogenesis in the DG in stroke rats, this property is not consistent with the behavioral recovery. More studies into this issue will be required to reveal how to translate enhanced neuronal plasticity into behavioral benefits. This review provides an update of the current knowledge about the neurogenesis and the fate of the newly generated cells after the use of fluoxetine, as well as its ability to promote a behavioral recovery after stroke in clinical and experimental results and attempts to define the therapeutic properties of fluoxetine in regenerative neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yefei Sun
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaoyu Sun
- Department of Neurology, The People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
| | - Huiling Qu
- Department of Neurology, The People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
| | - Shanshan Zhao
- Neurology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ting Xiao
- Dermatology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.,Key Laboratory of Immunodermatology, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Shenyang, China
| | - Chuansheng Zhao
- Neurology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Yeo SH, Lim ZJI, Mao J, Yau WP. Effects of Central Nervous System Drugs on Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Drug Investig 2018; 37:901-928. [PMID: 28756557 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-017-0558-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Pilot trials have suggested that pharmacotherapy may aid stroke recovery. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effects of antidepressants, anti-Alzheimer drugs, anti-Parkinson drugs, central nervous system (CNS) stimulants and piracetam on gross motor function, cognition, disability, dependency and quality of life (QOL) after stroke. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched, and 44 randomized controlled trials that compared outcomes of interest between drug treatment and placebo or no treatment were included. For each study, standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Meta-analyses were conducted to pool results using either the fixed-effects or random-effects model. RESULTS Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) improved gross motor function (SMD 0.54, 95% CI 0.22-0.85; three studies), disability (SMD 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.66; 14 studies) and QOL (MD 6.46, 95% CI 4.71-8.22; two studies), but there was insufficient evidence for their use in enhancing global cognition (SMD 0.23, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.46; five studies) and dependency (risk ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97; one fluoxetine study). In particular, gross motor function was improved by fluoxetine (SMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.31-0.98; two studies), while disability was improved by paroxetine (SMD 1.05, 95% CI 0.63-1.46; two studies), citalopram (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.08-0.93; two studies) and fluoxetine (SMD 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.60; nine studies). There is insufficient evidence for the use of anti-Alzheimer drugs, anti-Parkinson drugs, CNS stimulants and piracetam to promote stroke recovery. CONCLUSIONS Administration of SSRIs may improve gross motor function, reduce disability and enhance QOL for patients recovering from stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- See-Hwee Yeo
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore
| | - Zheng-Jie Ian Lim
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore
| | - Jia Mao
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore
| | - Wai-Ping Yau
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of escitalopram oxalate (ESO) for the treatment of post-stroke depression (PSD).A total of 115 patients with PSD were included in this study. A total of 65 patients underwent ESO (Intervention group). A total of 50 patients received acupressure (Control group). The outcome measurements included Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). In addition, we also recorded the adverse events in this study.At the end of 8-week treatment, ESO showed greater efficacy in depression, measured by MADRS (P < .01); anxiety, measured by HAM-A scale (P < .01); and disability, measured by SDS (P < .01), compared to acupressure. Additionally, there were not significant differences regarding adverse events between two groups (P > .05).The present results indicate that ESO can decrease symptoms of patients with PSD.
Collapse
|
49
|
Hillis AE, Beh YY, Sebastian R, Breining B, Tippett DC, Wright A, Saxena S, Rorden C, Bonilha L, Basilakos A, Yourganov G, Fridriksson J. Predicting recovery in acute poststroke aphasia. Ann Neurol 2018; 83:612-622. [PMID: 29451321 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many stroke patients show remarkable recovery of language after initial severe impairment, but it is difficult to predict which patients will show good recovery. We aimed to identify patient and lesion characteristics that together predict the best naming outcome in 4 studies. METHODS We report 2 longitudinal studies that identified 2 variables at onset that were strongly associated with good recovery of naming (the most common residual deficit in aphasia) in the first 6 months after stroke: damage to left posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG) and/or superior longitudinal fasciculus/arcuate fasciculus (SLF/AF), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use. We then tested these variables in 2 independent cohorts of chronic left hemisphere stroke patients, using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression for dichotomous outcomes and t tests for continuous outcomes. RESULTS Lesion load in left pSTG and SLF/AF was associated with poorer naming outcome. Preservation of these areas and use of SSRIs were associated with naming recovery, independent of lesion volume, time since stroke, and depression. Patients with damage to these critical areas showed better naming outcome if they took SSRIs for 3 months after stroke. Those with preservation of these critical areas achieved good recovery of naming regardless of SSRI use. INTERPRETATION Lesion load in left pSTG and SLF/AF at onset predicts later naming performance. Although based on a small number of patients, our preliminary results suggest outcome might be modulated by SSRIs, but these associations need to be confirmed in a larger randomized controlled trial. Ann Neurol 2018;83:612-622.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Argye E Hillis
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.,Department of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yuan Ye Beh
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rajani Sebastian
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bonnie Breining
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Donna C Tippett
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amy Wright
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sadhvi Saxena
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Chris Rorden
- Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Leonardo Bonilha
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Alexandra Basilakos
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Grigori Yourganov
- Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Julius Fridriksson
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Affiliation(s)
- Paul R Albert
- From the UOttawa Brain and Mind Research Insitute, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont., Canada
| |
Collapse
|