Ghrelin secretion is inhibited by glucose load and insulin-induced hypoglycaemia but unaffected by glucagon and arginine in humans

Ghrelin's Relationship to Blood Glucose

Much effort has been directed at studying the orexigenic actions of administered ghrelin and the potential effects of the endogenous ghrelin system on food intake, food reward, body weight, adiposity, and energy expenditure. Although endogenous ghrelin's actions on some of these processes remain ambiguous, its glucoregulatory actions have emerged as well-recognized features during extreme metabolic conditions. The blood glucose-raising actions of ghrelin are beneficial during starvation-like conditions, defending against life-threatening falls in blood glucose, but they are seemingly detrimental in obese states and in certain monogenic forms of diabetes, contributing to hyperglycemia. Also of interest, blood glucose negatively regulates ghrelin secretion. This article reviews the literature suggesting the existence of a blood glucose-ghrelin axis and highlights the factors that mediate the glucoregulatory actions of ghrelin, especially during metabolic extremes such as starvation and diabetes.

Evaluation of Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis by the GHRP2 Test: Comparison With the Insulin Tolerance Test

Context

GH-releasing peptide 2 (GHRP2) stimulates the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (HPA) through the GH secretagogue receptor (GHSR) in the hypothalamus, in which ghrelin is a natural ligand. Therefore, the GHRP2 test (GHRP2T) could be used instead of the insulin tolerance test (ITT).

Objective

Can the GHRP2T replace the ITT for evaluation of HPA?

Design

The present retrospective study analyzed the clinical features and laboratory data from 254 patients admitted for evaluation of hypopituitarism who underwent both GHRP2T and ITT. We analyzed the association between the maximum cortisol level (Fmax) during both tests. Adrenocortical insufficiency was diagnosed by ITT. The suitability of GHRP2T was examined using the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

A strong correlation was found between Fmax measured using both tests (r = 0.777, P < 0.0001). However, the sensitivity (64%) and specificity (79%) showed that the GHRP2T was not suitable for clinical use. Various factors influenced the correlation, probably through their effects on ghrelin and/or GHSR, including functional adenoma (P < 0.05) and sex (P < 0.05). No substantial correlation was found between Fmax measured using both tests in patients with prolactinoma (n = 30). The exclusion of patients with functional adenoma revealed no factors that affected the association in male patients; however, age and menstruation significantly influenced it in female patients (P < 0.05). Analysis of the data from male subjects without functional adenoma (n = 104) showed high sensitivity (95%) and specificity (85%) for the GHRP2T.

Conclusion

ITT can be substituted with GHRP2T for assessment of HPA in male patients free of functional adenoma.

Hypoglycemic Effect of Combined Ghrelin and Glucagon Receptor Blockade

Glucagon receptor (GcgR) blockade has been proposed as an alternative to insulin monotherapy for treating type 1 diabetes since deletion or inhibition of GcgRs corrects hyperglycemia in models of diabetes. The factors regulating glycemia in a setting devoid of insulin and glucagon function remain unclear but may include the hormone ghrelin. Not only is ghrelin release controlled by glucose but also ghrelin has many actions that can raise or reduce falls in blood glucose level. Here, we tested the hypothesis that ghrelin rises to prevent hypoglycemia in the absence of glucagon function. Both GcgR knockout (Gcgr^-/-) mice and db/db mice that were administered GcgR monoclonal antibody displayed lower blood glucose levels accompanied by elevated plasma ghrelin levels. Although treatment with the pancreatic β-cell toxin streptozotocin induced hyperglycemia and raised plasma ghrelin levels in wild-type mice, hyperglycemia was averted in similarly treated Gcgr^-/- mice and the plasma ghrelin level was further increased. Notably, administration of a ghrelin receptor antagonist further reduced blood glucose levels into the markedly hypoglycemic range in overnight-fasted, streptozotocin-treated Gcgr^-/- mice. A lowered blood glucose level also was observed in overnight-fasted, streptozotocin-treated ghrelin receptor-null mice that were administered GcgR monoclonal antibody. These data suggest that when glucagon activity is blocked in the setting of type 1 diabetes, the plasma ghrelin level rises, preventing hypoglycemia.

Comparison of gut hormones and adipokines stimulated by glucagon test among patients with type II diabetes mellitus after metabolic surgery

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) achieves a higher remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) than laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in non-morbidly obese patients. However, the mechanisms of the higher remission are unknown. To compare glucagon-provoked acute insulin responses, as well as changes of gut and pancreatic hormones and adipokines between patients with T2DM after RYGB and SG at one year post-operatively, a total of 14 RYGB and 13 SG patients were followed-up and evaluated for glucose metabolism, gut and pancreatic hormones, and adipokines. One year after surgery, 1-mg intravenous glucagon tests were performed. The differences in each hormone at different time points and the area under the curve (AUC) were compared between the two groups. Glucagon-stimulated acute insulin responses were not different between the RYGB and SG groups, nor were they different between the remitters and non-remitters at one year after the metabolic surgery. Plasma des-acyl ghrelin and nesfatin-1 levels significantly decreased at 6 min after glucagon stimulation in the RYGB and SG groups, as well as in the remitters and non-remitters. The glucagon test did not affect intestinal hormones. Plasma resistin was suppressed after intravenous glucagon stimulation in both RYGB and SG groups. In conclusion, intravenous glucagon inhibited plasma levels of des-acyl ghrelin, nesfatin-1, and resistin in T2DM patients at one year after both RYGB and SG, whereas post-glucagon suppression of plasma obestatin and resistin was shown in the remitters but not in the non-remitters.

Macronutrient Regulation of Ghrelin and Peptide YY in Pediatric Obesity and Prader-Willi Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The roles of macronutrients and GH in the regulation of food intake in pediatric obesity and Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

We compared effects of high-carbohydrate (HC) and high-fat (HF) meals and GH therapy on ghrelin, insulin, peptide YY (PYY), and insulin sensitivity in children with PWS and body mass index (BMI) -matched obese controls (OCs).

METHODS

In a randomized, crossover study, 14 PWS (median, 11.35 y; BMI z score [BMI-z], 2.15) and 14 OCs (median, 11.97 y; BMI-z, 2.35) received isocaloric breakfast meals (HC or HF) on separate days. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and every 30 minutes for 4 hours. Mixed linear models were adjusted for age, sex, and BMI-z.

RESULTS

Relative to OCs, children with PWS had lower fasting insulin and higher fasting ghrelin and ghrelin/PYY. Ghrelin levels were higher in PWS across all postprandial time points (P < .0001). Carbohydrate was more potent than fat in suppressing ghrelin levels in PWS (P = .028); HC and HF were equipotent in OCs but less potent than in PWS (P = .011). The increase in PYY following HF was attenuated in PWS (P = .037); thus, postprandial ghrelin/PYY remained higher throughout. A lesser increase in insulin and lesser decrease in ghrelin were observed in GH-treated PWS patients than in untreated patients; PYY responses were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Children with PWS have fasting and postprandial hyperghrelinemia and an attenuated PYY response to fat, yielding a high ghrelin/PYY ratio. GH therapy in PWS is associated with increased insulin sensitivity and lesser postprandial suppression of ghrelin. The ratio Ghrelin/PYY may be a novel marker of orexigenic drive.

Low glucose-induced ghrelin secretion is mediated by an ATP-sensitive potassium channel

Ghrelin is synthesized in X/A-like cells of the gastric mucosa, which plays an important role in the regulation of energy homeostasis. Although ghrelin secretion is known to be induced by neurotransmitters or hormones or by nutrient sensing in the ghrelin-secreting cells themselves, the mechanism of ghrelin secretion is not clearly understood. In the present study, we found that changing the extracellular glucose concentration from elevated (25  mM) to optimal (10 mM) caused an increase in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in ghrelin-secreting mouse ghrelinoma 3-1 (MGN3-1) cells (n=32, P<0.01), whereas changing the glucose concentration from elevated to lowered (5 or 1 mM) had little effect on [Ca2+]i increase. Overexpression of a closed form of an ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel mutant suppressed the 10  mM glucose-induced [Ca2+]i increase (n=8, P<0.01) and exocytotic events (n=6, P<0.01). We also found that a low concentration of a KATP channel opener, diazoxide, with 25  mM glucose induced [Ca2+]i increase (n=23, P<0.01) and ghrelin secretion (n≥3, P<0.05). In contrast, the application of a low concentration of a KATP channel blocker, tolbutamide, significantly induced [Ca2+]i increase (n=15, P<0.01) and ghrelin secretion (n≥3, P<0.05) under 5 mM glucose. Furthermore, the application of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel inhibitors suppressed the 10 mM glucose-induced [Ca2+]i increase (n≥26, P<0.01) and ghrelin secretion (n≥5, P<0.05). These findings suggest that KATP and voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels are involved in glucose-dependent ghrelin secretion in MGN3-1 cells.

Circulating acylghrelin levels are suppressed by insulin and increase in response to hypoglycemia in healthy adult volunteers

OBJECTIVE

Ghrelin has glucoregulatory and orexigenic actions, but its role in acute hypoglycemia remains uncertain. We aimed to investigate circulating levels of acylghrelin (AG) and unacylated ghrelin (UAG) in response to hyperinsulinemia and to hypoglycemia.

DESIGN

A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study including 3 study days was performed at a university hospital clinical research center.

METHODS

Nine healthy men completed 3 study days: i) saline control (CTR), ii) hyperinsulinemic euglycemia (HE) (bolus insulin 0.1 IE/kg i.v. and glucose 20% i.v. for 105 min, plasma glucose ≈5 mmol/l), and iii) hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (HH) (bolus insulin 0.1 IE/kg i.v.).

RESULTS

HH and HE suppressed AG concentrations at t=45-60 min as compared with CTR (P<0.05). At t=90 min, a rebound increase in AG was observed in response to HH as compared with both HE and CTR (P<0.05). UAG also decreased during HH and HE at t=45 min (P<0.05), whereas the AG-to-UAG ratio remained unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that AG and UAG are directly suppressed by hyperinsulinemia and that AG concentrations increase after a latency of ≈1 h in response to hypoglycemia, suggesting a potential counterregulatory role of AG.

Endocrine determinants of changes in insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion during a weight cycle in healthy men

Objective

Changes in insulin sensitivity (IS) and insulin secretion occur with perturbations in energy balance and glycemic load (GL) of the diet that may precede the development of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. Determinants of changes in IS and insulin secretion with weight cycling in non-obese healthy subjects remain unclear.

Methods

In a 6wk controlled 2-stage randomized dietary intervention 32 healthy men (26±4y, BMI: 24±2kg/m²) followed 1wk of overfeeding (OF), 3wks of caloric restriction (CR) containing either 50% or 65% carbohydrate (CHO) and 2wks of refeeding (RF) with the same amount of CHO but either low or high glycaemic index at ±50% energy requirement. Measures of IS (basal: HOMA-index, postprandial: Matsuda-ISI), insulin secretion (early: Stumvoll-index, total: tAUC-insulin/tAUC-glucose) and potential endocrine determinants (ghrelin, leptin, adiponectin, thyroid hormone levels, 24h-urinary catecholamine excretion) were assessed.

Results

IS improved and insulin secretion decreased due to CR and normalized upon RF. Weight loss-induced improvements in basal and postprandial IS were associated with decreases in leptin and increases in ghrelin levels, respectively (r = 0.36 and r = 0.62, p<0.05). Weight regain-induced decrease in postprandial IS correlated with increases in adiponectin, fT3, TSH, GL of the diet and a decrease in ghrelin levels (r-values between -0.40 and 0.83, p<0.05) whereas increases in early and total insulin secretion were associated with a decrease in leptin/adiponectin-ratio (r = -0.52 and r = -0.46, p<0.05) and a decrease in fT4 (r = -0.38, p<0.05 for total insulin secretion only). After controlling for GL associations between RF-induced decrease in postprandial IS and increases in fT3 and TSH levels were no longer significant.

Conclusion

Weight cycling induced changes in IS and insulin secretion were associated with changes in all measured hormones, except for catecholamine excretion. While leptin, adiponectin and ghrelin seem to be the major endocrine determinants of IS, leptin/adiponectin-ratio and fT4 levels may impact changes in insulin secretion with weight cycling.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01737034

The regulation of circulating ghrelin - with recent updates from cell-based assays

Ghrelin is a stomach-derived orexigenic hormone with a wide range of physiological functions. Elucidation of the regulation of the circulating ghrelin level would lead to a better understanding of appetite control in body energy homeostasis. Earlier studies revealed that circulating ghrelin levels are under the control of both acute and chronic energy status: at the acute scale, ghrelin levels are increased by fasting and decreased by feeding, whereas at the chronic scale, they are high in obese subjects and low in lean subjects. Subsequent studies revealed that nutrients, hormones, or neural activities can influence circulating ghrelin levels in vivo. Recently developed in vitro assay systems for ghrelin secretion can assess whether and how individual factors affect ghrelin secretion from cells. In this review, on the basis of numerous human, animal, and cell-based studies, we summarize current knowledge on the regulation of circulating ghrelin levels and enumerate the factors that influence ghrelin levels.

Nutrients differentially regulate nucleobindin-2/nesfatin-1 in vitro in cultured stomach ghrelinoma (MGN3-1) cells and in vivo in male mice

Nesfatin-1 is secreted, meal-responsive anorexigenic peptide encoded in the precursor nucleobindin-2 [NUCB2]. Circulating nesfatin-1 increases post-prandially, but the dietary components that modulate NUCB2/nesfatin-1 remain unknown. We hypothesized that carbohydrate, fat and protein differentially regulate tissue specific expression of nesfatin-1. NUCB2, prohormone convertases and nesfatin-1 were detected in mouse stomach ghrelinoma [MGN3-1] cells. NUCB2 mRNA and protein were also detected in mouse liver, and small and large intestines. MGN3-1 cells were treated with glucose, fatty acids or amino acids. Male C57BL/6 mice were chronically fed high fat, high carbohydrate and high protein diets for 17 weeks. Quantitative PCR and nesfatin-1 assays were used to determine nesfatin-1 at mRNA and protein levels. Glucose stimulated NUCB2 mRNA expression in MGN3-1 cells. L-Tryptophan also increased NUCB2 mRNA expression and ghrelin mRNA expression, and nesfatin-1 secretion. Oleic acid inhibited NUCB2 mRNA expression, while ghrelin mRNA expression and secretion was enhanced. NUCB2 mRNA expression was significantly lower in the liver of mice fed a high protein diet compared to mice fed other diets. Chronic intake of high fat diet caused a significant reduction in NUCB2 mRNA in the stomach, while high protein and high fat diet caused similar suppression of NUCB2 mRNA in the large intestine. No differences in serum nesfatin-1 levels were found in mice at 7 a.m, at the commencement of the light phase. High carbohydrate diet fed mice showed significantly elevated nesfatin-1 levels at 1 p.m. Serum nesfatin-1 was significantly lower in mice fed high fat, protein or carbohydrate compared to the controls at 7 p.m, just prior to the dark phase. Mice that received a bolus of high fat had significantly elevated nesfatin-1/NUCB2 at all time points tested post-gavage, compared to control mice and mice fed other diets. Our results for the first time indicate that nesfatin-1 is modulated by nutrients.

Interrelationships between ghrelin, insulin and glucose homeostasis: Physiological relevance

Ghrelin is a 28 amino acid peptide mainly derived from the oxyntic gland of the stomach. Both acylated (AG) and unacylated (UAG) forms of ghrelin are found in the circulation. Initially, AG was considered as the only bioactive form of ghrelin. However, recent advances indicate that both AG and UAG exert distinct and common effects in organisms. Soon after its discovery, ghrelin was shown to promote appetite and adiposity in animal and human models. In response to these anabolic effects, an impressive number of elements have suggested the influence of ghrelin on the regulation of metabolic functions and the development of obesity-related disorders. However, due to the complexity of its biochemical nature and the physiological processes it governs, some of the effects of ghrelin are still debated in the literature. Evidence suggests that ghrelin influences glucose homeostasis through the modulation of insulin secretion and insulin receptor signaling. On the other hand, insulin was also shown to influence circulating levels of ghrelin. Here, we review the relationship between ghrelin and insulin and we describe the impact of this interaction on the modulation of glucose homeostasis.

Peripheral Ghrelin participates in glucostatic feeding mechanisms and in the anorexigenic signalling mediated by CART and CRF neurons

Ghrelin is upregulated under negative energy balance conditions, including starvation and hypoglycemia, while it is downregulated under situations of positive energy balance, such as feeding, hyperglycemia and obesity. The aims of this study were to assess potential ghrelin interactions with glucose levels in appetite control and to identify potential mechanisms involving orexigenic and anorexigenic ghrelin mediated signals by using a specific anti-ghrelin antibody. Our results confirm that peripheral ghrelin is an important signal in meal initiation and food intake stimulation. C-fos positive neurons in the PVN increased after insulin or 2-deoxyglucose administration. Moreover, we also demonstrate that peripheral ghrelin blockade with a specific anti-ghrelin antibody reduces, in part, the orexigenic signal induced by insulin and 2-DG administration. Furthermore, when we blocked peripheral ghrelin, c-fos positive CRF neurons and CART expression increased in the PVN, both under hypoglycemia or cytoglycopenia conditions, suggesting a neuronal activation (anorexigenic signalling) in this hypothalamic region. In summary, our findings imply that peripheral ghrelin plays an important role in regulatory "glucostatic" feeding mechanisms due to its role as a "hunger" signal affecting the PVN area, which may contribute to energy homeostasis through both orexigenic/anorexigenic pathways.

Structure and physiological actions of ghrelin

Ghrelin is a gastric peptide hormone, discovered as being the endogenous ligand of growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Ghrelin is a 28 amino acid peptide presenting a unique n-octanoylation modification on its serine in position 3, catalyzed by ghrelin O-acyl transferase. Ghrelin is mainly produced by a subset of stomach cells and also by the hypothalamus, the pituitary, and other tissues. Transcriptional, translational, and posttranslational processes generate ghrelin and ghrelin-related peptides. Homo- and heterodimers of growth hormone secretagogue receptor, and as yet unidentified receptors, are assumed to mediate the biological effects of acyl ghrelin and desacyl ghrelin, respectively. Ghrelin exerts wide physiological actions throughout the body, including growth hormone secretion, appetite and food intake, gastric secretion and gastrointestinal motility, glucose homeostasis, cardiovascular functions, anti-inflammatory functions, reproductive functions, and bone formation. This review focuses on presenting the current understanding of ghrelin and growth hormone secretagogue receptor biology, as well as the main physiological effects of ghrelin.

Desacyl ghrelin is influenced by changes in insulin concentration during an insulin tolerance test

OBJECTIVE

Ghrelin, a gut-brain peptide, regulates energy homeostasis and glucose metabolism and is present in acylated and nonacylated form in the circulation. Although desacyl ghrelin (DAG), the predominant form of ghrelin, is associated with insulin sensitivity and improved metabolic state, not much is known about its direct regulation by insulin. We aimed to assess changes in DAG in response to the rapid increase in insulin concentration during an insulin tolerance test (ITT) in normal weight and obese subjects.

DESIGN

We performed an observational single center study. An ITT was assessed in eight subjects (four males), median age of 29.9 years (range 19.6-42.0). DAG concentrations were measured at 20, 40, 60 and 90 min after insulin infusion. Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA) was calculated from fasting insulin and glucose. Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference were assessed.

RESULTS

Three subjects were obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)), one subject was overweight (BMI = 25-30 kg/m(2)) and four subjects had normal weight (BMI = 18.5-25 kg/m(2)). Median DAG decreased after insulin infusion (90 pg/mL, p = 0.028), especially in normal weight subjects. Baseline DAG was lower in subjects with higher BMI (ρ = -0.76, p = 0.028) and higher fasting insulin (ρ = -0.76, p = 0.030). DAG changes correlated with fasting insulin levels (ρ = -0.85, p = 0.007), HOMA (ρ = -0.86, p = 0.007), BMI (ρ = -0.83, p = 0.010) and waist circumference (ρ = -0.93, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DAG levels rapidly decreased in response to insulin administration in normal subjects, but not in insulin-resistant obese who are in a state of relative DAG deficiency.

Early alterations in plasma ghrelin levels in offspring of calorie-restricted rats during gestation may be linked to lower sympathetic drive to the stomach

Serum ghrelin concentration is generally reduced in obesity. We aimed to assess whether this alteration is present in rats predisposed to obesity because of moderate undernutrition during gestation, and to explore whether this could be related with alterations in stomach sympathetic innervation, which is involved in gastric ghrelin secretion. Offspring of control and 20% gestational calorie-restricted dams (CR) exposed to normal-fat-diet from weaning onward were studied. Circulating ghrelin levels were measured at 25 days and 4 months of age. Morphometry, number of ghrelin-positive (ghrelin(+)) cells, ghrelin mRNA and protein levels, and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) protein levels in stomach were determined at 25 days. Adult CR male animals, but not females, exhibited greater body-weight (BW) than their controls, but both males and females showed lower circulating ghrelin levels. This alteration in ghrelin levels was already present at 25 days, prior to any difference in BW. At this juvenile age, no differences in gastric morphometry, number of ghrelin(+) cells or ghrelin mRNA/protein levels were found between control and CR animals, however, CR animals showed lower TH stomach content. These results suggest that circulating ghrelin concentration is early altered in rats prenatally programmed to develop obesity. This does not seem to be associated with lower ghrelin production capacity but with specific alterations in sympathetic drive to the stomach.

Acylated and desacylated ghrelin, preptin, leptin, and nesfatin-1 Peptide changes related to the body mass index

This study examines the levels of acylated and desacylated ghrelin, preptin, leptin, and nesfatin-1 peptide changes related to the body mass index (BMI). The subjects were allocated to 5 groups depending on their BMIs as follows: Group I (BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)); Group II (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)); Group III (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2)); Group IV (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m(2)); Group V (BMI >40 kg/m(2)). Serum acylated and desacylated ghrelin, preptin, and leptin levels were measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and nesfatin-1 was measured by the enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Desacylated ghrelin levels showed a gradual and statistically significant drop from Group I to Group V, while preptin and leptin levels exhibited a gradual and significant increase from Group I to Group IV. Serum nesfatin-1 levels gradually, but not significantly, increased from Group I to Group III and showed a significant decrease in Groups IV and V. In conclusion, leptin, preptin, and acylated ghrelin (AG) levels increased with higher BMI, whereas desacylated ghrelin (DAG) decreased and nesfatin-1 showed no clear relationship to BMI.

Serum ghrelin level and TNF-α/ghrelin ratio in patients with previous myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Studies investigating serum ghrelin level in atherosclerosis yielded contradictory results. Interaction of ghrelin with adipocytokines is obscure in cardiovascular diseases. We undertook this study to determine which molecules influence ghrelin level and to see whether post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients have decreased ghrelin levels.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, acyl-ghrelin concentration was determined by radioimmunoassay in sera of 171 patients (ages 62 ± 6 years, mean ± SD) with previous MI and 81 age-matched referent subjects. We evaluated the associations of ghrelin with insulin, adiponectin, leptin, resistin, fetuin-A and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).

RESULTS

Patients had lower ghrelin levels compared to referent subjects (240.55 ± 59.33 vs. 337.96 ± 30.75 pg/mL, p <0.001) even after excluding diabetic and obese patients (240.63 ± 54.08 vs. 337.96 ± 30.75, p <0.001). In multivariate analysis, insulin (β = -0.327, p <0.001) and adiponectin (β = 0.301, p <0.001) determined ghrelin level (R(2) = 0.199, p <0.001). There was no association between ghrelin and TNF-α levels. In discriminant analysis using ghrelin, adiponectin, leptin, fetuin-A, resistin and TNF-α, the structure matrix revealed ghrelin and TNF-α as strongest predictors for belonging to the patient group (0.760 and -0.569, respectively). Using these two parameters, 89.7% of cases were correctly classified. Subjects with high TNF-α/ghrelin ratio had 11.25 times higher chance for belonging to the patient group (95% CI 5.80-21.80; χ(2) (1) = 215.6, p <0.001)

CONCLUSIONS

Acylated ghrelin levels are decreased in patients with coronary atherosclerosis, independently of body weight and the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ghrelin level is determined by elevated insulin and decreased adiponectin levels. Ghrelin alone or in combination with TNF-α may prove to be a novel indicator of coronary atherosclerosis.

Ghrelin levels increase after pictures showing food

The neuropeptide ghrelin is a major signal for food intake in various species including humans. After exogenous ghrelin administration, food intake and body weight increase in rodents. In normal human subjects, ghrelin administration increases self-rated appetite and calorie intake and prompts the imagination of favorite meals. It is unclear so far whether ghrelin levels are affected by external cues such as sight of food. We investigated the influence of pictures showing food compared to neutral pictures on ghrelin levels in young normal male subjects (n = 8). The study consisted of two consecutive sessions with a one-week interval. During each session, blood for later analysis of plasma concentrations of ghrelin was collected between 08:15 and 13:00 every 15 min (between 10:30 and 11:30 every 10 min). Breakfast and lunch was provided at 08:30 and 12:00, respectively. Fifty pictures were presented from 10:30 to 10:45 showing neutral images during the first session and food contents during the second session. As expected, ghrelin levels increased before each meal independent of the picture contents. In addition, ghrelin levels during the 30-min interval following the presentation of pictures with food increased significantly compared to the 30-min interval before this presentation (area under the curve (AUC): 188 % vs. 158 %, P < 0.05). The difference in the increases between the two picture conditions was also significant (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that sight of food elevates ghrelin levels in healthy volunteers.

Effect of Arginine Infusion on Ghrelin Secretion in Growth Hormone Sufficient and GH Deficient Children

BACKGROUND

The physiological link between ghrelin and growth hormone (GH) has not yet been fully clarified. Furthermore, the existence of a negative feedback mechanism between growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor (GH-IGF)-I axis and ghrelin and the influence of amino acids on ghrelin secretion in children remain matters of debate.

OBJECTIVES

To understand the regulation of ghrelin secretion and clarify the relationship between ghrelin and GH secretion in GH-deficient (GHD) and GH-sufficient (GHS) children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten GHD (male/female [M/F], 6/4; age [mean ± SEM], 10.7 ± 0.9 years) and 10 GHS prepubertal children (M/F, 6/4; age [mean ± SEM], 10.3 ± 0.6 years), underwent an arginine (ARG) test (infusion, 0.5 g/kg, iv). Levels of GH, total ghrelin, and acylated ghrelin (AG) were assayed every 30 min from 0 to +120 min.

RESULTS

Peak GH values were lower in GHD subjects than in GHS subjects (P < 0.0001). The baseline levels, peak levels, or area under the curves (AUC) for total ghrelin and AG were similar between GHD and GHS children. ARG infusion was followed by a slight to significant decrease in total ghrelin levels, but not AG levels, both in GHD and GHS subjects with a nadir at +30 min. No correlation was seen between GH, total ghrelin, or AG response and ARG infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Total ghrelin and AG levels seemed unaffected by GH status in prepubertal children. ARG infusion was unable to blunt ghrelin secretion irrespective of GH status in childhood. Moreover, since ARG influences GH secretion via modulation of somatostatin release, ghrelin secretion seems to be partially refractory to somatostatin action.

Effects on metabolic variables after 12-month treatment with a new once-a-week sustained-release recombinant growth hormone (GH: LB03002) in patients with GH deficiency

INTRODUCTION

GH substitution in GH deficiency (GHD) must be subcutaneously administered daily. A new sustained-release formulation of GH (LB03002) has been developed, which has to be injected once a week. As a substudy to the phase III study, we performed this prospective study to evaluate the influence of LB03002 on metabolic variables and hormones.

METHODS

Eleven patients with GHD [four women/seven men, 58 years (29-69 years)] without GH therapy were included in the study. Eight patients were treated with LB03002 for 12 months and three patients received placebo for 6 months followed by LB03002 for 6 months. A 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed at study entry and at study end. Additionally, IGF-I, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, leptin, ghrelin, HbA1c and C-peptide were measured. Body composition was evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and waist/hip ratio (WHR) and waist/height (WHtR) ratio were measured by tape and scale.

RESULTS

Multiple of upper limit of normal (xULN) of IGF-I (0·23 (0·09-0·4) vs 0·71 (0·4-1·04), P < 0·01), WHR (0·98 (0·86-1·04) vs 1·01 (0·86-1·05), P < 0·05) and ghrelin levels [119·8 ng/l (67·7-266·6) vs 137 ng/l (67-289·5), P < 0·05] were significantly higher, whereas fat mass (FM) [34·7% (20·4-49·2) vs 32·4% (16·7-48·5), P < 0·05] and leptin [11·2 μg/l (3·3-55·7) vs 7·05 μg/l (2·4-54·3), P < 0·05] were significantly lower at study end. Glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, ISI, HOMA-β, C-peptide and HbA1c during OGTT were not significantly different before and after GH substitution, neither were BMI, WHtR, bone mineral density and lipid variables.

CONCLUSION

Substitution with LB03002 showed statistically significant reduction in FM, which reduces leptin levels and increases ghrelin levels but does not seem to influence glucose and lipid metabolism.

GPR39, a receptor of the ghrelin receptor family, plays a role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis in a mouse model of early onset diet-induced obesity

GPR39, which may function as a Zn(2+) sensor, is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family that also includes the receptor for the hunger hormone ghrelin. The down-regulation of GPR39 mRNA in adipose tissue of obese type 2 diabetic patients suggests that GPR39 may contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. The present study aimed to investigate the role of GPR39 in the regulation of energy balance and glucose homeostasis in wild-type (GPR39(+/+) ) and GPR39 knockout mice (GPR39(-/-) ) with obesity-related type 2 diabetes. GPR39 mRNA levels in adipose tissue of fasted GPR39(+/+) mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) for 30 weeks were reduced and correlated positively with blood glucose levels. Body weight, fat percentage and energy intake were increased in the HFD group but did not differ between both genotypes. Within the HFD group, blood glucose levels were lower in GPR39(-/-) than in GPR39(+/+) mice, despite significant reductions in prandial plasma insulin levels. The latter may not be a result of changes in β-cell hyperplasia because immunohistochemical staining of pancreata of mice on a HFD showed no differences between genotypes. The lower blood glucose levels may involve alterations in insulin sensitivity as revealed by glucose tolerance tests and respiratory quotient measurements that showed a preference of obese GPR39(-/-) mice for the use of carbohydrates as metabolic fuel. The increase in plasma ghrelin levels in GPR39(-/-) mice fed a HFD may contribute to the alterations in glucose homeostasis, whereas changes in gastric emptying or intestinal Zn(2+) absorption are not involved. The results obtained in the present study suggest that GPR39 plays a role in the pathogenesis of obesity-related type 2 diabetes by affecting the regulation of glucose homeostasis.

Lipopolysaccharide differentially decreases plasma acyl and desacyl ghrelin levels in rats: potential role of the circulating ghrelin-acylating enzyme GOAT

Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in rodents is an established model for studying innate immune responses to gram-negative bacteria and mimicking symptoms of infections including reduced food intake associated with decreased circulating total ghrelin levels. The ghrelin-acylating enzyme, ghrelin-O-acyltransferase (GOAT) involved in the formation of acyl ghrelin (AG) was recently identified. We investigated changes in circulating AG, desacyl ghrelin (DG) and GOAT induced by intraperitoneal LPS (100 microg/kg) and associated changes in food intake. Plasma AG and total ghrelin were assessed by radioimmunoassay, GOAT protein by Western blot and mRNA by RT-qPCR. DG was derived from total minus AG. Plasma AG and DG were decreased at 2, 5 and 7 h (p<0.01) post-injection compared to vehicle and recovered at 24 h. At 2 h there was a significantly greater decrease of AG (-53%) than DG (-28%) resulting in a decreased AG/DG ratio (1:5, p<0.01), which thereafter returned to pre-injection values (1:3). This altered ratio was associated with a 38% decrease in plasma GOAT protein compared to vehicle (p<0.001), whereas gastric GOAT protein was slightly increased by 10% (p<0.05). GOAT mRNA expression was unchanged. Food intake was reduced by 58% measured during the 1.5-2 h period post-LPS injection. Decreased plasma AG and DG preceded the rise in rectal temperature and blood glucose that peaked at 7 h. These data indicate that LPS induces a long-lasting reduction of AG and DG levels that may have a bearing with the decrease in food intake. The faster drop in AG than DG within 2 h is associated with reduced circulating GOAT.

Des-acyl ghrelin has specific binding sites and different metabolic effects from ghrelin in cardiomyocytes

The current study aimed to compare the effects of the peptide hormone ghrelin and des-G, its unacylated isoform, on glucose and fatty acid uptake and to identify des-G-specific binding sites in cardiomyocytes. In the murine HL-1 adult cardiomyocyte line, ghrelin and des-G had opposing metabolic effects: des-G increased medium-chain fatty acid uptake (BODIPY fluorescence intensity), whereas neither ghrelin alone nor in combination with des-G did so. Ghrelin inhibited the increase in glucose uptake normally induced by insulin (rate of 2-[(3)H]deoxy-d-glucose incorporation), but des-G did not; des-G was also able to partially reverse the inhibitory effect of ghrelin. In HL-1 cells and primary cultures of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, des-G but not ghrelin increased insulin-induced translocation of glucose transporter-4 from nuclear to cytoplasmic compartments (immunohistochemistry and quantitative confocal analysis). AKT was phosphorylated by insulin but not affected by ghrelin or des-G, whereas neither AMP-activated protein kinase nor phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10 was phosphorylated by any treatments. HL-1 and primary-cultured mouse and rat cardiomyocytes each possessed two independent specific binding sites for des-G not recognized by ghrelin (radioreceptor assays). Neither ghrelin nor des-G affected viability (dimethylthiazol diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays), whereas both isoforms were equally protective against apoptosis. Therefore, in cardiomyocytes, des-G binds to specific receptors and has effects on glucose and medium-chain fatty acid uptake that are distinct from those of ghrelin. Real-time PCR indicated that expression levels of ghrelin O-acyltransferase RNA were comparable between HL-1 cells, human myocardial tissue, and human and murine stomach tissue, indicating the possibility of des-G conversion to ghrelin within our model.

Ghrelin in diabetes and metabolic syndrome

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of related risk factors for cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and liver disease. Obesity, which has become a global public health problem, is one of the major risk factors for development of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Obesity is a complex disease, caused by the interplay between environmental and genetic factors. Ghrelin is one of the circulating peptides, which stimulates appetite and regulates energy balance, and thus is one of the candidate genes for obesity and T2DM. During the last years both basic research and genetic association studies have revealed association between the ghrelin gene and obesity, metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes.

Ghrelin cells in the gastrointestinal tract

Ghrelin is 28-amino-acid peptide that was discovered from the rat and human stomach in 1999. Since the discovery of ghrelin, various functions of ghrelin, including growth hormone release, feeding behavior, glucose metabolism, memory, and also antidepressant effects, have been studied. It has also been reported that ghrelin in the gastrointestinal tract has an important physiological effect on gastric acid secretion and gastrointestinal motility. Ghrelin has a unique structure that is modified by O-acylation with n-octanoic acid at third serine residues, and this modification enzyme has recently been identified and named ghrelin O-acyl transferase (GOAT). Ghrelin is considered to be a gut-brain peptide and is abundantly produced from endocrine cells in the gastrointestinal mucosa. In the gastrointestinal tract, ghrelin cells are most abundant in the stomach and are localized in gastric mucosal layers. Ghrelin cells are also widely distributed throughout the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, abundance of ghrelin cells in the gastric mucosa is evolutionally conserved from mammals to lower vertebrates, indicating that gastric ghrelin plays important roles for fundamental physiological functions. Ghrelin cells in the gastrointestinal tract are a major source of circulating plasma ghrelin, and thus understanding the physiology of these cells would reveal the biological significance of ghrelin.

Ghrelin gene products and the regulation of food intake and gut motility

A breakthrough using "reverse pharmacology" identified and characterized acyl ghrelin from the stomach as the endogenous cognate ligand for the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) 1a. The unique post-translational modification of O-n-octanoylation at serine 3 is the first in peptide discovery history and is essential for GH-releasing ability. Des-acyl ghrelin, lacking O-n-octanoylation at serine 3, is also produced in the stomach and remains the major molecular form secreted into the circulation. The third ghrelin gene product, obestatin, a novel 23-amino acid peptide identified from rat stomach, was found by comparative genomic analysis. Three ghrelin gene products actively participate in modulating appetite, adipogenesis, gut motility, glucose metabolism, cell proliferation, immune, sleep, memory, anxiety, cognition, and stress. Knockdown or knockout of acyl ghrelin and/or GHS-R1a, and overexpression of des-acyl ghrelin show benefits in the therapy of obesity and metabolic syndrome. By contrast, agonism of acyl ghrelin and/or GHS-R1a could combat human anorexia-cachexia, including anorexia nervosa, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, burn, and postsurgery recovery, as well as restore gut dysmotility, such as diabetic or neurogenic gastroparesis, and postoperative ileus. The ghrelin acyl-modifying enzyme, ghrelin O-Acyltransferase (GOAT), which attaches octanoate to serine-3 of ghrelin, has been identified and characterized also from the stomach. To date, ghrelin is the only protein to be octanylated, and inhibition of GOAT may have effects only on the stomach and is unlikely to affect the synthesis of other proteins. GOAT may provide a critical molecular target in developing novel therapeutics for obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Influence of long-term growth hormone replacement on leptin and ghrelin in GH deficiency before and after glucose load

INTRODUCTION

This cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the effect of long-term GH substitution on leptin and ghrelin in GH deficiency (GHD).

METHODS

Leptin and ghrelin were measured after glucose load for 3 h in 52 pat and 10 age- and BMI-matched healthy controls. 22 GHD pat were on GH substitution (GH-Sub) for a median of 10 yr (range 2-27 yr). 30 age- and BMI-matched GHD pat were not substituted for at least 2 yr (non-Sub).

RESULTS

Basal leptin (8 microg/l (1-130) vs. 16 microg/l (3-89), p<0.05) and AUC of leptin (p<0.05) was significantly lower in GH-Sub compared to non-Sub. In the control group, leptin was higher compared to GH-Sub and similar to non-Sub (19 microg/l (4-57)). Ghrelin (baseline: non-Sub 113 ng/l (61-270), GH-Sub 145 ng/l (83-280), controls 131 ng/l (83-274)) were slightly but not significantly lower for non-Sub. After glucose load, a significant decrease in leptin appeared in both GHD groups, but not in the control group. Ghrelin decreased significantly in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Lipolytic GH causes lower leptin in GH-Sub. The reason for similar ghrelin might be the compensating effect of acute GH suppression and stimulating low fat mass on ghrelin. Leptin regulation after glucose load is impaired in GHD, whereas ghrelin regulation seems to be not effected.

Serum ghrelin levels in growth hormone-sufficient and growth hormone-deficient patients during growth hormone-releasing hormone plus arginine test

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ghrelin is an orexigenic hormone produced in the stomach and in other organs, exerting a wide range of metabolic functions, including stimulation of GH secretion. Ghrelin secretion is decreased by iv or oral glucose load as well as during euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp and hypoglycemia. We evaluated the circulating ghrelin levels in GH-deficient (GHD) and in GH-sufficient (GHS) patients during GHRH plus arginine test.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group comprised 35 patients, including 20 with pituitary tumors, 12 with empty sella, 2 with short stature, and 1 with post-traumatic isolated GH deficiency. According to the results of GHRH plus arginine test, 14 patients were defined as GHD and 21 as GHS. Patients with central hypothyroidism, hypocorticism, and hypogonadism had been on replacement therapy for at least 3 months at the moment of the study. Blood samples were collected every 20 min up to 60 min after GHRH and arginine administration.

RESULTS

By definition, GH response to GHRH plus arginine was higher in GHS than GHD group (p<0.0001). Basal serum ghrelin levels were not different in the two groups and did not correlate with body mass index, GH, IGFI and insulin concentrations. After GHRH plus arginine, serum ghrelin decreased significantly in both groups, with percent decreases ranging 13.3-66.6% in GHD patients (p=0.001) and 7.2-42.2% in GHS patients (p=0.004), with no significant difference in the two groups (p=0.12).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that ghrelin secretion is not modulated by acute GH increase observed in GHS subjects during GHRH plus arginine infusion. The similar decrease of serum ghrelin after GHRH plus arginine stimulation in both GHS and GHD subjects demonstrated that there is no negative feedback of GH on ghrelin secretion.

Portal vein glucose sensors do not play a major role in modulating physiological responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in humans

OBJECTIVE

Experimental data from animal studies indicate that portal vein glucose sensors play a key role in the responses to slow-fall hypoglycemia. However, their role in modulating these responses in humans is not well understood. The aim of the present study was to examine in humans the potential role of portal vein glucose sensors in physiological responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia mimicking the slow fall of insulin-treated diabetic subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Ten nondiabetic subjects were studied on two different occasions during intravenous insulin (2 mU . kg(-1) . min(-1)) plus variable glucose for 160 minutes. In both studies, after 60 min of normal plasma glucose concentrations, hypoglycemia (47 mg/dl) was induced slowly (60 min) and maintained for 60 min. Hypoglycemia was preceded by the ingestion of either oral placebo or glucose (28 g) given at 30 min.

RESULTS

Plasma glucose and insulin were not different with either placebo or glucose (P > 0.2). Similarly, counterregulatory hormones, substrates, and symptoms were not different with either placebo or glucose. The Stroop color and colored words subtest of the Stroop test deteriorated less (P < 0.05) with glucose than placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to animals, in humans, prevention of portal hypoglycemia with oral glucose from the beginning of insulin-induced slow-fall hypoglycemia has no effect on sympathoadrenal and symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia.

Decreased levels of ghrelin, cortisol, and fasting blood sugar, but not n-octanoylated ghrelin, in Japanese schizophrenic inpatients treated with olanzapine

The mechanism by which chronic administration of olanzapine induces a marked weight gain in patients with schizophrenia remains unknown. We examined the influence of long-term treatment with olanzapine on plasma levels of hormones regulating food intake and energy homeostasis in schizophrenia. In this study, olanzapine was administered to 28 Japanese inpatients for 16 weeks after switching from typical antipsychotic drugs or risperidone. At endpoint, no significant changes in body weight or body mass index were found. There was a significant decrease in the plasma levels of ghrelin without any accompanying change in active, n-octanoylated ghrelin. Serum levels of leptin tended to be increased and a significant reduction in plasma cortisol levels was found. In addition, the levels of fasting blood sugar as well as free fatty acid were significantly decreased. Furthermore, we did not confirm any marked weight gain induced by chronic administration of olanzapine as previously reported. The reason for this discrepancy may be due to differences in subjects and treatment settings. Based on these findings, it is unlikely that the decrease in plasma ghrelin levels by chronic administration of olanzapine affects weight gain. Further studies examining the effect of chronic olanzapine administration on weight and energy homeostasis in inpatients are required.

Changes in total ghrelin within the somatotropic axis in severe burn patients: comparison of those with inhalation injury and those without inhalation injury

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to clarify changes in total ghrelin within the somatotropic axis in severe burn subjects with or without inhalation injury as well as the responsiveness of GH, IGF-1, and IGFBP-3 to the different severity of burn injuries.

DESIGN

Twenty-three patients with severe burn injuries (>30% of 2nd degree burns or >10% of 3rd degree burns) were classified into 2 groups according to inhalation injury: group I with inhalation injury (n=9) and group II without inhalation injury (n=14). The evaluations of serum GH, IGF-1, IGFBP-3, and total ghrelin were done on post-burn injury days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 40. Cortisol levels were measured from 24-h urine collections on post-burn injury days 7 and 21.

RESULTS

In all subjects, the levels of GH fluctuated throughout the observation period whereas IGF-1 showed an initial decline with nadir on day 7 and a subsequent increase through day 40. The levels of IGFBP-3 and total ghrelin showed a progressive increase with nadir on day 3. Compared with the group II, the GH levels were increased in the group I on post-burn days 3, 7, and 14, of which day 7 showed statistical significance (p<0.05). The levels of IGF-1 (days 7 and 21; p<0.05) and IGFBP-3 (days 7, 14, 21, and 40; p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.05, p<0.05, respectively) were lower in the group I than in the group II throughout the study period. On post-burn injury days 3, 7, 14, and 21, total ghrelin levels were lower in the group I than in the group II with statistical significance on post-burn day 7 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our present data show a concurrence of elevated GH levels and decreased IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and total ghrelin levels during the early burn injury period, in addition to more GH burst amplitude as well as greater falling of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and total ghrelin levels proportional to the severity of burn injury. Further studies are needed to ascertain whether acyl- and desacyl-ghrelin instead of total ghrelin are completely independent of increased GH or other stress mediators, and whether GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) mainly stimulates the production and release of GH in acute critical conditions.

Intravenous glucose administration in fasting rats has differential effects on acylated and unacylated ghrelin in the portal and systemic circulation: a comparison between portal and peripheral concentrations in anesthetized rats

Ghrelin is produced by the gastrointestinal tract, and its systemic concentrations are mainly regulated by nutritional factors. Our aim was to investigate: 1) endogenous portal and systemic acylated and unacylated ghrelin levels (AG and UAG, respectively); 2) whether an iv glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) modifies AG and UAG; and 3) whether the liver passage plays a role in regulating systemic AG and UAG. To elucidate this, we evaluated the effects of IVGTT or saline injection on endogenous portal and systemic concentrations of glucose, insulin, AG, and UAG in anesthetized fasting rats. Hepatic extraction of insulin, AG, and UAG and the ratio of AG to UAG were also measured. IVGTT suppressed both portal (P < 0.03) and peripheral (P < 0.05) UAG, whereas it only blunted prehepatic, but not peripheral, AG. During fasting, hepatic clearance of UAG was 11%, and it was decreased to 8% by IVGTT. AG was cleared by the liver by 38% but unaffected by glucose. The AG to UAG ratio was higher in the portal than the systemic circulation, both in the saline (P < 0.004) and IVGTT (P < 0.0005) rats. In conclusion, this study shows that: 1) the ratio of AG to UAG is very low in the portal vein and decreases further in the systemic circulation; 2) IVGTT in anesthetized fasting rats inhibits UAG, whereas it only blunts prehepatic, but not systemic, AG; and 3) hepatic clearance of AG is much higher than that of UAG. Thus, our results suggest that peripheral AG metabolic regulation and action are mainly confined within the gastrointestinal tract.

Growth hormone response to different consecutive stress stimuli in healthy men: is there any difference?

The contribution of growth hormone (GH), released during acute and repeated stressful situations, to the development of stress-related disorders is often neglected. We have hypothesized that the modulation of the GH response to sequential stress exposure in humans depends mainly on the nature of the stressor. To test this hypothesis, we compared GH responses to different stressful situations, namely aerobic exercise, hypoglycemia and hyperthermia, which were applied in two sequential sessions separated by 80-150 min. In addition, administration of the dopaminergic drug apomorphine was used as a pharmacological stimulus. GH responses to submaximal exercise (bicycle ergometer, increasing work loads of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 W/kg, total duration 20 min) and hyperthermia in a sauna (80 degrees C, 30 min) were prevented when preceded by the same stress stimulus. Hypoglycemia induced by insulin (0.1 IU/kg intravenously) resulted in a significant GH response also during the second of the two consecutive insulin tests, though the response was reduced. Administration of apomorphine (0.75 mg subcutaneously) or insulin prevented the increase in GH release in response to a sequential bolus of apomorphine, while hypoglycemia induced a significant elevation in GH levels even if applied after a previous treatment with apomorphine. In conclusion, the feedback inhibition of the GH response to a sequential stress stimulus depends on the stimulus used. Unlike in the case of exercise and hyperthermia, mechanisms involved in the stress response to hypoglycemia appear to overcome the usual feedback mechanisms and to re-induce the GH response when applied after another stimulus.

Secretion of ghrelin from rat stomach ghrelin cells in response to local microinfusion of candidate messenger compounds: a microdialysis study

Ghrelin is produced by A-like cells (ghrelin cells) in the mucosa of the acid-producing part of the stomach. The mobilization of ghrelin is stimulated by nutritional deficiency and suppressed by nutritional abundance. In an attempt to identify neurotransmitters and regulatory peptides that may contribute to the physiological, nutrient-related regulation of ghrelin secretion, we challenged the ghrelin cells in situ with a wide variety of candidate messengers, including known neurotransmitters (e.g. acetylcholine, catecholamines), candidate neurotransmitters (e.g. neuropeptides), local tissue hormones (e.g. serotonin, histamine, bradykinin, endothelin), circulating gut hormones (e.g. gastrin, CCK, GIP, neurotensin, PYY, secretin) and other circulating hormones/regulatory peptides (e.g. calcitonin, glucagon, insulin, PTH). Microdialysis probes were placed in the submucosa of the acid-producing part of the rat stomach. Three days later, the putative messenger compounds were administered via the microdialysis probe (reverse microdialysis) at a screening dose of 0.1 mmol l(-1) for regulatory peptides and 0.1 and 1 mmol l(-1) for amines and amino acids. The rats were awake during the experiments. The resulting microdialysate ghrelin concentration was monitored continuously for 3 h (radioimmunoassay), thereby revealing stimulators or inhibitors of ghrelin secretion. Dose-response curves were constructed for each candidate messenger that significantly (p<0.05) affected ghrelin mobilization at the screening dose. Peptides that showed a (non-significant) tendency to affect ghrelin release at the screening dose were also given at a dose of 0.3 or 1 mmol l(-1). Adrenaline, noradrenaline, endothelin and secretin stimulated ghrelin release, while somatostatin and GRP inhibited. Whether these agents act directly or indirectly on the ghrelin cells remains to be investigated. All other candidate messengers were without measurable effects, including acetylcholine, serotonin, histamine, GABA, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, glycine, VIP, PACAP, CGRP, substance P, NPY, PYY, PP, gastrin, CCK, GIP, insulin, glucagon, GLP and glucose.

Plasma ghrelin response to an oral glucose load in growth hormone-deficient adults treated with growth hormone

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the pathophysiology of ghrelin secretion in growth hormone-deficient adults treated with growth hormone, and the relationship between plasma ghrelin and hyperinsulinemia induced by an oral glucose load has not been investigated in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

In the present study we examined the relationship between plasma ghrelin, insulin, C-peptide and leptin after an oral glucose load in growth hormone-deficient adults receiving treatment with growth hormone.

METHODS

Plasma ghrelin, leptin, insulin, C-peptide and blood glucose were measured before and then at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after the ingestion of glucose (75 g orally) in 20 growth hormone-deficient adults (12 women and 8 men), who had been treated with growth hormone for 7.2 +/- 1.3 years (mean +/- SE). Plasma ghrelin was also determined before and after the glucose load in 10 age-and weight-matched healthy persons (5 women and 5 men).

RESULTS

The oral glucose load induced a similar percent suppression of plasma ghrelin in the growth hormone-deficient patients and in the healthy persons. In both groups plasma ghrelin decreased significantly 30 min after the glucose load and remained suppressed throughout the test period. In the patients plasma insulin (baseline, 15.9 +/- 3.9 microIU/ml) and C-peptide (baseline, 2.5 +/- 0.3 ng/ml) showed opposite changes with peak responses at 30 min (insulin, 109.5 +/- 15.6 microIU/ml) or 60 min (C-peptide, 10.3 +/- 1.1 ng/ml). In these patients, post-glucose, but not baseline plasma ghrelin levels correlated negatively with plasma insulin, C-peptide and blood glucose levels, whereas baseline plasma ghrelin correlated inversely with baseline plasma leptin.

CONCLUSIONS

The similar suppression of plasma ghrelin in growth hormone-deficient patients treated with growth hormone and in healthy persons after an oral glucose load argues against disturbed regulation of ghrelin secretion in these patients. The correlations between post-glucose plasma ghrelin, insulin and blood glucose support the existence of a previously proposed link between hyperinsulinemia (or increased blood glucose) and suppression of ghrelin levels.

Relation of nutrients and hormones in polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance, infertility, and hirsutism, common characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), improve with even modest weight loss. Optimal dietary treatment for PCOS is not known.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effects of acute protein administration with those of glucose challenges on hormones related to obesity and insulin resistance (ie, cortisol and insulin), hirsutism [ie, dehydroepiandosterone (DHEA) and androstenedione], and hunger (ie, ghrelin).

DESIGN

Patients with PCOS (n = 28; aged 26 +/- 2 y) were tested with a 5-h oral-glucose-tolerance test (OGTT) and a euvolemic, euenergetic protein challenge.

RESULTS

Glucose ingestion caused larger fluctuations in blood glucose and more hyperinsulinemia than did protein (P < 0.01, overall treatment-by-time interaction). During the protein challenge, cortisol and DHEA declined over 5 h. During OGTT, cortisol and DHEA increased after the third hour and began to show significant divergence from protein from the fourth hour (P <or= 0.01). During OGTT, 18 patients who had a blood glucose nadir of <69 mg/dL had elevated cortisol (baseline: 10.4 +/- 0.4; nadir: 5.9 +/- 0.1; peak: 12.7 +/- 0.9 microg/dL) and DHEA (baseline: 15.6 +/- 1.3; nadir: 11.2 +/- 1.0; peak: 24.6 +/- 1.6 ng/mL) (P < 0.01), whereas the remaining 10 patients with a glucose nadir of 76 +/- 2 mg/dL had no increase in adrenal steroids. Both glucose and protein suppressed ghrelin (from 935 +/- 57 to 777 +/- 51 pg/mL and from 948 +/- 60 to 816 +/- 61 pg/mL, respectively). After glucose ingestion, ghrelin returned to baseline by 4 h and increased to 1094 +/- 135 pg/mL at 5 h. After the protein challenge, ghrelin remained below the baseline (872 +/- 60 pg/mL) even at 5 h. The overall treatment effect was highly significant (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Glucose ingestion caused significantly more hyperinsulinemia than did protein, and it stimulated cortisol and DHEA. Protein intake suppressed ghrelin significantly longer than did glucose, which suggested a prolonged satietogenic effect. These findings provide mechanistic support for increasing protein intake and restricting the simple sugar intake in a PCOS diet.

Ghrelin does not regulate the GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in children but could be involved in the regulation of cortisol secretion

OBJECTIVE

Ghrelin activates the growth hormone secretagogue receptor GHS-R. It strongly stimulates GH secretion and has a role in energy homeostasis. The relationship between plasma ghrelin and cortisol levels during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in prepubertal and pubertal children has not yet been investigated. The aim of the present study was to establish whether insulin-induced hypoglycaemia stimulates ghrelin secretion and whether changes in ghrelin concentrations are related to changes in GH and cortisol in children.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

We studied a group of 20 children and adolescents (five girls, 15 boys, mean age 10.8 +/- 3.7 years) undergoing insulin tolerance tests (ITTs) for clinical investigation of GH deficiency.

MEASUREMENTS

Stimulation tests were performed to investigate the relationship between ghrelin, GH, cortisol and glucose levels according to age and pubertal stage by determining the ghrelin profiles during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (at 0, 60 and 120 min).

RESULTS

Ghrelin was significantly and inversely related to body weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and age of children (P < 0.05). Significant changes in ghrelin levels (P = 0.00013) were found after the insulin bolus, with a decline at 60 min and an increase to baseline values at 120 min. Changes in cortisol levels were negatively correlated with changes in ghrelin at 60 min (r = -0.59, P = 0.004) and at 120 min (r = -0.605, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that ghrelin might not regulate the GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in prepubertal and pubertal children. A role for ghrelin in the regulation of cortisol secretion can be hypothesized concerning the negative correlation between changes in ghrelin and cortisol. Furthermore, the results imply that ghrelin secretion is age dependent and is a function of growth.

Central and peripheral roles of ghrelin on glucose homeostasis

Ghrelin, an acylated 28-amino-acid peptide, is an endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue type 1a (GHS-R1a). Ghrelin is best known for its hypothalamic actions on growth hormone-releasing hormone neurons and neuropeptide Y/agouti-related peptide neurons; however, ghrelin affects multiple organ systems and the complexity of its functions is only now being realized. Although ghrelin is mainly produced in the stomach, it is also produced in low levels by the hypothalamus and by most peripheral tissues. GHS-R1a is expressed predominantly in the anterior pituitary gland, at lower levels in the brain including hypothalamic neurons that regulate feeding behavior and glucose sensing, and at even lower levels in the pancreas. A reciprocal relationship exists between ghrelin and insulin, suggesting that ghrelin regulates glucose homeostasis. Ablation of ghrelin in mice increases glucose-induced insulin secretion, and improves peripheral insulin sensitivity. This review focuses on the newly emerging role of ghrelin in glucose homeostasis and exploration of whether ghrelin is a potential therapeutic target for diabetes.

Role of endogenous ghrelin in growth hormone secretion, appetite regulation and metabolism

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid hormone that is acylated post-translation, is the endogenous ligand for the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R). The highest concentrations of ghrelin are found in the stomach; however ghrelin peptide is also present in hypothalamic nuclei known to be important in the control of GH and feeding behavior. Exogenous ghrelin potently stimulates pituitary GH release through a mechanism that is dependent, in part, on endogenous GH-releasing hormone. Whether endogenous ghrelin plays a role in the control of GH secretion and growth is not clear and ghrelin deficient animals appear to grow normally. In contrast, experimental animal and clinical data suggest that abnormalities in GHS-R signaling could impact growth. Ghrelin or other GHS are clinically useful for GH-testing and limited data suggest that they might be useful in the treatment of some patients with GH deficiency. Substantial data have implicated ghrelin as an important regulator of feeding behavior and energy equilibrium. Ghrelin has a potent orexigenic effect in both animals and humans and this effect is mediated through hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY) and Agouti-related peptide (AgRP). Appetite simulation coupled with other metabolic effects promotes weight gain during chronic treatment with ghrelin. These metabolic effects are in part mediated through an increase in respiratory quotient (VQ). Presence of ghrelin appears to be necessary for the development of obesity in some animal models. Whether abnormalities in ghrelin signaling are involved in human obesity is not yet known.

Hypoglycaemia-Insulin Test: Discordant Growth Hormone and Cortisol Response in Paediatric Patients Regarding Recovery from Hypoglycaemia with or without Oral Glucose Solution

BACKGROUND

Hypoglycaemia-insulin test (HIT) is the 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of adrenal-pituitary-hypothalamic axis disorders. Controversy exists on the convenience of recovery from an insulin-induced hypoglycaemia since this test is not risk-free.

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain whether recovery from insulin-induced hypoglycaemia with an oral glucose solution produces a different response of growth hormone (GH) and cortisol at different times of the study compared with spontaneous recovery from hypoglycaemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective study of 100 children and adolescents with growth delay who underwent an HIT. Patients were consecutively assigned to two groups of 50. In one group recovery from hypoglycaemia occurred spontaneously and in the other recovery was achieved with an oral glucose solution (20 g of glucose) when glycaemia was under 30 mg/dl. The two groups did not differ in age, sex, pubertal status, weight, height and IGF-I levels.

RESULTS

The response of GH at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min and cortisol at 10, 60, 90 and 120 min was lower and statistically significant in patients with recovery from hypoglycaemia with oral glucose solution. GH deficiency was diagnosed more frequently in patients recovered with glucose solutions (94%) compared to those with spontaneous recovery (68%).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral glucose solution administration when glycaemia was under 30 mg/dl in HIT produced a lower GH and cortisol response to insulin stimulus and a greater frequency of GH deficit diagnosis.

LPS inhibits fasted plasma ghrelin levels in rats: role of IL-1 and PGs and functional implications

LPS injected intraperitoneally decreases fasted plasma levels of ghrelin at 3 h postinjection in rats. We characterized the inhibitory action of LPS on plasma ghrelin and whether exogenous ghrelin restores LPS-induced suppression of food intake and gastric emptying in fasted rats. Plasma ghrelin and insulin and blood glucose were measured after intraperitoneal injection of LPS, intravenous injection of IL-1beta and urocortin 1, and in response to LPS under conditions of blockade of IL-1 or CRF receptors by subcutaneous injection of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) or astressin B, respectively, and prostaglandin (PG) synthesis by intraperitoneal indomethacin. Food intake and gastric emptying were measured after intravenous injection of ghrelin at 5 h postintraperitoneal LPS injection. LPS inhibited the elevated fasted plasma ghrelin levels by 47.6 +/- 4.9%, 58.9 +/- 3.3%, 74.4 +/- 2.7%, and 48.9 +/- 8.7% at 2, 3, 5, and 7 h postinjection, respectively, and values returned to preinjection levels at 24 h. Insulin levels were negatively correlated to those of ghrelin, whereas there was no significant correlation between glucose and ghrelin. IL-1Ra and indomethacin prevented the first 3-h decline in ghrelin levels induced by LPS, whereas astressin B did not. IL-1beta inhibited plasma ghrelin levels, whereas urocortin 1 had no influence. Ghrelin injected intravenously prevented an LPS-induced 87% reduction of gastric emptying and 61% reduction of food intake. These data showed that IL-1 and PG pathways are part of the early mechanisms by which LPS suppresses fasted plasma ghrelin and that exogenous ghrelin can normalize LPS-induced-altered digestive functions.

Serum ghrelin levels are suppressed in hypopituitary patients following insulin-induced hypoglycaemia irrespective of GH status

OBJECTIVE

Circulating ghrelin is suppressed during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in healthy subjects, but it is unknown whether this is determined by feedback inhibition from counter-regulatory hormones. We therefore investigated the impact of GH and cortisol on ghrelin secretion during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia.

DESIGN

Serum levels of ghrelin, GH, and cortisol were measured in 41 adult patients with suspected hypopituitarism during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. Based on their peak GH response (cut-off level: 3 microg/l), the patients were divided into a GH-sufficient group (GHS) and a GH-deficient group (GHD).

RESULTS

The GHS patients (n = 16) were younger (P < 0.01), had lower baseline cortisol levels [255 +/- 37 vs. 372 +/- 38 nmol/l (P = 0.04)], and tended to have a lower body mass index (P = 0.09) as compared to GHD patients (n = 25). By definition, peak GH (microg/l) was higher in GHS patients [15.0 +/- 1.8 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.2 (P < 0.0001)]. The increase in serum cortisol during the ITT (insulin-tolerance test) was higher and occurred later in GHS patients [Cmax (nmol/l): 561 +/- 41 vs. 412 +/- 50 (P = 0.04); Tmax (minutes): 65 +/- 5 vs. 49 +/- 5 (P = 0.03)]. Serum ghrelin levels changed significantly with time during ITT in both groups (P < 0.0001), characterized by a moderate decline during the initial 50-60 min and a return to baseline after 2 h. No significant differences were recorded in AUCghrelin during the ITT between the two groups. No gender differences in ghrelin levels were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

(i) Like in healthy subjects serum ghrelin levels are suppressed during an ITT in patients with suspected hypopituitarism. (ii) The suppression of ghrelin was similar in GHD and GHS subjects and was not determined by cortisol. (iii) We hypothesize that insulin rather than hypoglycaemia accounts for ghrelin suppression during an ITT.

Peripheral ghrelin participates in the glucostatic signaling mediated by the ventromedial and lateral hypothalamus neurons

Employing immunohistochemistry techniques, we examined the c-fos expression in different hypothalamic areas, when plasma glucose levels were modified by the administration of insulin and 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) respectively. Subsequently, the hypoglycemia produced by an injection of insulin significantly increased feeding concomitant to higher c-fos expression in the arcuate nucleus (ARC), paraventricular nucleus (PVN), dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH) and lateral hypothalamus (LH), while no statistical changes in the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) were found. Also, the glucopenia induced by 2-DG administration produced similar stimulatory effects on appetite and the neuronal activity affecting all the hypothalamic areas studied, including the VMH. The peripheral blockade of the orexigenic hormone ghrelin with a specific antibody (AGA) significantly decreased food intake as induced from acute hypoglycemia and glucopenia. Curiously, the conjoint AGA and insulin or 2-DG administration produced a differential effect on the hypothalamic neurons analyzed, by increasing the number of c-fos positive neurons in the ARC, PVN and DMH, but not in the VMH and LH. This outcome suggests an interactive effect of the glucostatic pathways involving these two areas with the ghrelin signaling.

Oral glucose load inhibits circulating ghrelin levels to the same extent in normal and obese children

OBJECTIVE

The presence of both the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor and ghrelin in the pancreas indicates an involvement of this hormone in glucose metabolism. Ghrelin secretion is increased by fasting and energy restriction, decreased by food intake, glucose load, insulin and somatostatin in normal adults; however, food intake is not able to inhibit circulating ghrelin levels in children, suggesting that the profile of ghrelin secretion in children is different from that in adults. Moreover, how ghrelin secretion is regulated in childhood as a function of fat mass is still unclear.

DESIGN AND SUBJECTS

We studied the effect of oral glucose load (75 g solution orally) on circulating total ghrelin levels in 14 obese children (group A, four boys and 10 girls, aged 9.3 +/- 2.3 years) and 10 lean children (group B, five boys and five girls, aged 9.7 +/- 3.8 years).

MEASUREMENTS

In all the sessions, blood samples were collected every 30 min from 0 up to +120 min. GH, insulin and glucose levels were assayed at each time point.

RESULTS

Glucose peaks following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in groups A and B were similar; however, both basal and OGTT-stimulated insulin levels in group A were higher than in group B (P < 0.05). Basal total ghrelin levels in group A (281.3 +/- 29.5 pg/ml) were lower (P < 0.0005) than in group B (563.4 +/- 81.5 pg/ml). In both groups A and B, the OGTT inhibited total ghrelin levels (P < 0.005). In terms of absolute values, total ghrelin levels in group A were lower (P < 0.0005) than those in group B at each time point after glucose load. The percentage nadir in total ghrelin levels recorded in group A (-25% at 90 min) was similar to that recorded in group B (-31% at 120 min). Total ghrelin levels were negatively associated with BMI (r = 0.5, P < 0.005) but not with glucose or insulin levels.

CONCLUSION

Ghrelin secretion is reduced in obese children. It is, however, equally sensitive in both obese and lean children to the inhibitory effect of oral glucose load.

Effect of a high-protein breakfast on the postprandial ghrelin response

BACKGROUND

The most satiating macronutrient appears to be dietary protein. Few studies have investigated the effects of dietary protein on ghrelin secretion in humans.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate whether a high-protein (HP) breakfast is more satiating than a high-carbohydrate breakfast (HC) through suppression of postprandial ghrelin concentrations or through other physiologic processes.

DESIGN

Fifteen healthy men were studied in a single-blind, crossover design. Blood samples and subjective measures of satiety were assessed frequently for 3 h after the consumption of 2 isocaloric breakfasts that differed in their protein and carbohydrate content (58.1% of energy from protein and 14.1% of energy from carbohydrate compared with 19.3% of energy from protein and 47.3% of energy from carbohydrate). The gastric emptying rate was indirectly assessed with the acetaminophen absorption test.

RESULTS

The HP breakfast decreased postprandial ghrelin secretion more than did the HC breakfast (P < 0.01). Ghrelin concentrations were correlated with glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (r = -0.65; 95% CI: -0.85, -0.29) and glucagon concentrations (r = -0.47; 95% CI: -0.75, -0.03). Compared with the HC breakfast, the HP breakfast increased glucagon (P < 0.0001) and cholecystokinin (P < 0.01), tended to increase glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (P = 0.07) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (P = 0.10), and decreased the gastric emptying rate (P < 0.0001). Appetite ratings were not significantly different between the 2 treatments, and the HP breakfast did not significantly affect ad libitum energy intake.

CONCLUSIONS

The HP breakfast decreased postprandial ghrelin concentrations more strongly over time than did the HC breakfast. High associations between ghrelin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon suggest that stimulation of these peptides may mediate the postprandial ghrelin response. The HP breakfast also reduced gastric emptying, probably through increased secretion of cholecystokinin and glucagon-like peptide 1.

Gut hormones ghrelin, PYY, and GLP-1 in the regulation of energy balance [corrected] and metabolism

The first hormone discovered in the gastrointestinal tract was secretin, isolated from duodenal mucosa. Some years later, two additional gastrointestinal hormones, gastrin and cholecystokinin (CCK), were discovered, but it was not until the 1970s that gastrointestinal endocrinology studies became more prevalent, resulting in the discovery of many more hormones. Here, we examine the role of gut hormones in energy balance regulation and their possible use as pharmaceutical targets for obesity.

Growth hormone expression and secretion in pig pituitary and median eminence slices are not influenced by the VGF protein

Body homeostasis is maintained by a complex system that involves the brain and the periphery via many circulating hormones. In recent years the VGF protein has been indicated as an important peptide affecting the regulation of body composition. We examined the effects of VGF on growth hormone (GH) expression and secretion in porcine pituitary slices, incubated alone (group 1) or with stalk median eminence (SME) (group 2). After 2 h (time 0), medium was removed and replaced with a fresh one; tissues were challenged with VGF (10(-6) M, 10(-8) M) alone or with ghrelin (10(-8) M) or growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) (10(-8) M). Medium was replaced again 2 h (+2) and 6 h (+6) later. None of the VGF concentrations influenced GH secretion in either group; the association with GHRH or ghrelin appeared ineffective in influencing GH secretion as compared with the effects of GH mRNA expression and was not influenced by VGF treatments. The presence of SME had an additive effect on GH expression. Collectively, our results confirm previous findings on GH regulation; however, further investigations are needed to establish whether the modulation of GH secretion in the absence of nutrients involves the balance of GHRH/ghrelin receptors at pituitary levels. As for VGF, a crucial aspect to clarify is whether its lack of effects depends on our experimental conditions or, alternatively, it is not effective at all.

Short-Term Secretory Regulation of Ghrelin during Growth Hormone Provocative Tests in Prepubertal Children with Various Growth Hormone Secretory Capacities

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ghrelin is a novel gastric peptide which stimulates GH secretion and has been demonstrated to have orexigenic and adipogenic properties. Insulin is a physiological and dynamic modulator of plasma ghrelin, and insulinemia possibly mediates the effect of the nutritional state on the plasma concentrations of ghrelin in adults. No data on the regulation of GH secretion by ghrelin have so far been reported, nor has the possible influence of hypoglycemia on the plasma ghrelin levels in children been reported.

METHODS

Provocative studies were performed using a variety of stimuli, including insulin-induced hypoglycemia, and glucagon, arginine and L-dopa loading. We studied a group of 27 children with short stature being investigated for GH deficiency (10 F, 17 M; age 4-14 years; height SDS -0.92 to -3.27); the subjects were instructed to fast overnight, and the following morning, the relationships among the plasma ghrelin, GH and glucose levels were investigated by determining the plasma ghrelin profiles during those provocative tests. Using a new method for determining the two types of ghrelin, samples were obtained for determination of the plasma ghrelin, serum glucose and serum GH levels after the administration of the aforementioned stimulating agents.

RESULTS

All the four stimuli caused a significant decrease in the circulating C- and N-ghrelin levels with a nadir at +30 min, with the exception of the N-ghrelin level following the L-dopa loading. During the same period, the plasma GH level increased following insulin, arginine and L-dopa loading, and the plasma glucose level increased significantly following glucagon loading. In the arginine and L-dopa load connected, a significant correlation was observed between the 30-min change in the serum GH level and the 30-min change in the plasma C-ghrelin level. In the multiple regression analysis to explain the 30-min change in the plasma level of C-ghrelin, the baseline plasma level of C-ghrelin (basal), height and % overweight were the only three significant parameters, accounting for 85.2% of the variance.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the inverse relation between the circulating GH and ghrelin levels may indicate the existence of a feedback loop, and also lends support to the assumption of a GH-independent relationship between plasma ghrelin and glucose levels. These observations constitute further evidence to suggest that peripheral ghrelin is a direct growth-promoting hormone.

Prandial regulation of ghrelin secretion in humans: does glucagon contribute to the preprandial increase in circulating ghrelin?

OBJECTIVE

Glucagon secretion is stimulated by fasting and inhibited postprandially, a pattern that mimics the secretory profiles of both ghrelin and GH. We thus hypothesized that glucagon may be a determinant of the changes in circulating ghrelin and GH that occur in relation to meals. The objective of the study was to explore this hypothesis by determining the ghrelin and GH response to a bolus of glucagon or saline in healthy subjects.

SUBJECTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Nine healthy volunteers, mean age 47 years (range 33-58) and body mass index (BMI) 24 kg/m2 (range 20.9-27.6) were recruited and received either 1 mg glucagon (n = 9) or 1 ml saline (n = 6) subcutaneously on separate days between 0800 and 0830 h after an overnight fast. Venous blood was then sampled at 15-min intervals during the first hour, followed by 30-min intervals up to 4 h for glucose, insulin, GH, cortisol, somatostatin and ghrelin.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SE basal ghrelin was 213.1 +/- 34.3 pmol/l and decreased significantly by 15 min after glucagon administration to 179.3 +/- 28 pmol/l (P = 0.01), then remaining suppressed relative to the basal value until 240 min after glucagon. Plasma insulin increased from a basal value of 46.7 +/- 7.7 pmol/l to a peak of 327.1 +/- 54.9 pmol/l (P < 0.0001). There was an inverse statistical relationship between the increase in insulin over the first 120 min and the decrease in ghrelin (P = 0.005), while somatostatin, GH and glucose were not significant contributors to the decrease in ghrelin (P > 0.05). Mean +/- SE basal GH was 7.3 +/- 2.9 microg/l and increased by 150 min after glucagon to a peak of 20.5 +/- 6.8 microg/l (P = 0.006). Changes in neither ghrelin nor glucose were related to the increase in GH (P = 0.7). Saline administration did not produce any significant change in ghrelin, insulin or somatostatin although the expected diurnal reduction in cortisol (P < 0.05) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found no evidence that glucagon stimulates ghrelin secretion in humans and supports the hypothesis that insulin is a negative regulator of ghrelin secretion in the postprandial state. We did not find a negative relationship between endogenous somatostatin and ghrelin despite earlier reports that exogenously administered somatostatin analogues suppress plasma ghrelin. Finally, glucagon-induced GH secretion is not mediated by an increase in plasma ghrelin.