1
|
Franco-Moreno A, Acedo-Gutiérrez MS, Casado-Suela MÁ, Labrador-San Martín N, de Carranza-López M, Ibáñez-Estéllez F, Hernández-Blanco C, Jiménez-Torres J, Vallejo-Maroto I, Romero-Pareja R, Peña-Lillo G, Escobar-Rodríguez I, Torres-Macho J. Effect of early administration of dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and risk of development of acute respiratory distress syndrome: EARLY-DEX COVID-19 trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1385833. [PMID: 39086948 PMCID: PMC11290468 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1385833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction and objectives Corticosteroids are among the drugs demonstrating a mortality benefit for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The RECOVERY trial highlighted that dexamethasone reduced 28-day mortality for hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring either supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation. It is noted that approximately 30% of COVID-19 patients, initially presenting with mild symptoms, will advance to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially those with detectable laboratory markers of inflammation indicative of disease progression. Our research aimed to explore the efficacy of dexamethasone in preventing the progression to ARDS in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia who do not yet require additional oxygen but are at high risk of developing ARDS, potentially leading to a reduction in morbimortality. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we evaluated the impact of dexamethasone on adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia who did not need supplementary oxygen at admission but were identified as having risk factors for ARDS. The risk of ARDS was determined based on specific criteria: elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels over 245 U/L, C-reactive protein levels exceeding 100 mg/L, and a lymphocyte count below 0.80 × 109/L. Participants were randomly allocated to either receive dexamethasone or the standard care. The primary endpoints included the incidence of moderate or severe ARDS and all-cause mortality within 30 days post-enrollment. Results One hundred twenty-six patients were randomized. Among them, 41 were female (30.8%), with a mean age of 48.8 ± 14.4 years. Ten patients in the dexamethasone group (17.2%) and ten patients in the control group (14.7%) developed moderate ARDS with no significant differences. Mechanical ventilation was required in six patients (4.7%), with four in the treatment group and two in the control group. There were no deaths during hospitalization or during follow-up. An intermediate analysis for futility showed some differences between the control and treatment groups (Z = 0.0284). However, these findings were within the margins close to the region where the null hypothesis would not be rejected. Conclusion In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without oxygen needs but at risk of progressing to severe disease, early dexamethasone administration did not lead to a decrease in ARDS development. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04836780.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabel Franco-Moreno
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor–Virgen de la Torre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Miguel Ángel Casado-Suela
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor–Virgen de la Torre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - María de Carranza-López
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor–Virgen de la Torre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Rodolfo Romero-Pareja
- Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal, Madrid, Spain
- European University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gabriela Peña-Lillo
- Emergency Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor–Virgen de la Torre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ismael Escobar-Rodríguez
- Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor–Virgen de la Torre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Torres-Macho
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor–Virgen de la Torre, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shandera WX. COVID-19 ethics: unique aspects and a review as of early 2024. Monash Bioeth Rev 2024:10.1007/s40592-024-00199-x. [PMID: 39003388 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00199-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
COVID-19 presents a variety of ethical challenges in a set of arenas, arenas not always considered in past pandemics. These challenges include issues related to autonomy, distributive ethics, and the establishment of policies of equity and justice. Methods are a literature review based on regular editing of an online textbook during the COVID-19 outbreak and a literature review using key ethical terms. Patients are confronted with new issues related to autonomy. Providers need to expand their concepts of ethical issues to include decisions based on proportionality and public health ethics. The public health sector needs to assess the beneficence of alternative modes of disease control. The research community needs to redefine the concept of informed consent in emergent conditions. All elements of the medical spectrum-physicians, scientists, and the community-at-large including the pharmaceutical industry-need to consider the multifaceted methods for preventing future pandemics. This will require giving particular emphasis to public health funding and ending the documented discrimination that exists in the provision of proven therapies. The developing world is especially at risk for most of the ethical issues, especially those related to equity and justice. The ethical issues associated with the COVID-19 outbreak are not unique but provide a diverse set of issues that apply to patients, providers, social groups, and investigators. The further study of such issues can help with preventing future outbreaks.
Collapse
|
3
|
Mozaffari E, Chandak A, Chima-Melton C, Kalil AC, Jiang H, Lee E, Der-Torossian C, Thrun M, Berry M, Haubrich R, Gottlieb RL. Remdesivir is Associated with Reduced Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 Not Requiring Supplemental Oxygen. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae202. [PMID: 38894848 PMCID: PMC11182948 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Remdesivir has demonstrated benefit in some hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on supplemental oxygen and in nonhospitalized patients breathing room air. The durability of this benefit across time periods with different circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants of concern (VOC) is unknown. This comparative effectiveness study in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and not receiving supplemental oxygen at admission compared those starting remdesivir treatment in the first 2 days of admission with those receiving no remdesivir during their hospitalization across different VOC periods. Method Using a large, multicenter US hospital database, in-hospital mortality rates were compared among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 but not requiring supplemental oxygen at admission between December 2020 and April 2022. Patients receiving remdesivir at hospital admission were matched 1:1 to those not receiving remdesivir during hospitalization, using propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess 14- and 28-day in-hospital mortality rates or discharge to hospice. Results Among the 121 336 eligible patients, 58 188 remdesivir-treated patients were matched to 17 574 unique patients not receiving remdesivir. Overall, 5.4% of remdesivir-treated and 7.3% in the non-remdesivir group died within 14 days, and 8.0% and 9.8%, respectively, died within 28 days. Remdesivir treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the in-hospital mortality rate compared with non-remdesivir treatment (14-day and 28-day adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval], 0.75 [0.68-0.83] and 0.83 [0.76-0.90], respectively). This significant mortality benefit endured across the different VOC periods. Conclusions Remdesivir initiation in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and not requiring supplemental oxygen at admission was associated with a significantly reduced in-hospital mortality rate. These findings highlight a potential survival benefit when clinicians initiated remdesivir on admission across the dominant variant eras of the evolving pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Essy Mozaffari
- Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA
| | | | - Chidinma Chima-Melton
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California–Los Angeles Health, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Andre C Kalil
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Heng Jiang
- Evidence & Access, Certara, Paris, France
| | - EunYoung Lee
- Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA
| | | | - Mark Thrun
- Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA
| | - Mark Berry
- Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA
| | | | - Robert L Gottlieb
- Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Burnett School of Medicine at TCU, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Citarella BW, Kartsonaki C, Ibáñez-Prada ED, Gonçalves BP, Baruch J, Escher M, Pritchard MG, Wei J, Philippy F, Dagens A, Hall M, Lee J, Kutsogiannis DJ, Wils EJ, Fernandes MA, Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan BK, Panda PK, Martin-Loeches I, Ohshimo S, Fatoni AZ, Horby P, Dunning J, Rello J, Merson L, Rojek A, Vaillant M, Olliaro P, Reyes LF. Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital with and without respiratory symptoms. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29591. [PMID: 38779000 PMCID: PMC11109728 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 is primarily known as a respiratory illness; however, many patients present to hospital without respiratory symptoms. The association between non-respiratory presentations of COVID-19 and outcomes remains unclear. We investigated risk factors and clinical outcomes in patients with no respiratory symptoms (NRS) and respiratory symptoms (RS) at hospital admission. Methods This study describes clinical features, physiological parameters, and outcomes of hospitalised COVID-19 patients, stratified by the presence or absence of respiratory symptoms at hospital admission. RS patients had one or more of: cough, shortness of breath, sore throat, runny nose or wheezing; while NRS patients did not. Results Of 178,640 patients in the study, 86.4 % presented with RS, while 13.6 % had NRS. NRS patients were older (median age: NRS: 74 vs RS: 65) and less likely to be admitted to the ICU (NRS: 36.7 % vs RS: 37.5 %). NRS patients had a higher crude in-hospital case-fatality ratio (NRS 41.1 % vs. RS 32.0 %), but a lower risk of death after adjusting for confounders (HR 0.88 [0.83-0.93]). Conclusion Approximately one in seven COVID-19 patients presented at hospital admission without respiratory symptoms. These patients were older, had lower ICU admission rates, and had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality after adjusting for confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christiana Kartsonaki
- MRC Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trials Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elsa D. Ibáñez-Prada
- Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
- Clínica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | | | - Joaquin Baruch
- ISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Martina Escher
- ISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark G. Pritchard
- ISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jia Wei
- Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Fred Philippy
- Competence Centre for Methodology and Statistics, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Andrew Dagens
- ISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew Hall
- Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James Lee
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Demetrios James Kutsogiannis
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Evert-Jan Wils
- Department of Intensive Care, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marília Andreia Fernandes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Curry Cabral, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | - Ignacio Martin-Loeches
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St James' Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Shinichiro Ohshimo
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Arie Zainul Fatoni
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Brawijaya University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
| | - Peter Horby
- ISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jake Dunning
- ISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jordi Rello
- Vall d'Hebrón Institute Research, Barcelona, Spain
- CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - Laura Merson
- ISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Amanda Rojek
- ISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michel Vaillant
- Competence Centre for Methodology and Statistics, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Piero Olliaro
- ISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Luis Felipe Reyes
- ISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
- Clínica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Angermair S, Hardenberg JH, Rubarth K, Balzer F, Akbari N, Menk M, Spies C, Eckardt KU, Poddubnyy D, Siegmund B, Schneider T, Treskatsch S. In-hospital survival of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter real-world data study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12138. [PMID: 38802435 PMCID: PMC11130266 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62302-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a major challenge to healthcare systems globally. Millions of people have been infected, and millions of deaths have been reported worldwide. Glucocorticoids have attracted worldwide attention for their potential efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19. Various glucocorticoids with different dosages and treatment durations have been studied in patients with different severities, with a suitable dosage and treatment duration not yet defined. This study aimed to investigate whether in-hospital survival differs between critically ill patients treated with low-dose glucocorticoids, high-dose glucocorticoids or no glucocorticoids. All critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the Charité Hospital-Universitätsmedizin Berlin between February 2020 and December 2021 with COVID-19 pneumonia receiving supplemental oxygen were eligible to participate in this multicenter real-world data study. Patients were retrospectively assigned to one of three groups: the high corticosteroid dose (HighC) group (receiving 6 mg parenteral dexamethasone or an equivalent corticosteroid dosage for ten days), the low corticosteroid dose (LowC) group (receiving less than 6 mg parenteral dexamethasone or an equivalent corticosteroid dosage for ten days), or the no corticosteroid (NoC) group. Overall survival and risk effects were compared among groups within the total observation period, as well as at 35 days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. Adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to compare the risk of death between the treatment groups. Out of 1561 critically ill COVID-19 patients, 1014 were included in the baseline analysis. In the survival study, 1009 patients were assigned to the NoC (n = 346), HighC (n = 552), or LowC group (n = 111). The baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, except for age, BMI, APACHE II score, SOFA and SAPS II. While the 35-day survival did not show any differences, a landmark analysis of the patients surviving beyond 35 days revealed differences between groups. The restricted mean survival time was 112 days in the LowC group [95% CI: 97 - 128], 133 days in the HighC group [95% CI: 124 - 141] and 144 days in the NoC group [95% CI: 121 - 167]. The multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated that, regardless of age, sex, health status or invasive oxygenation, a low-dose treatment increased the hazard of death of critically ill COVID-19 patients by a factor of 2.09 ([95% CI: 0.99, 4.4], p = 0.05) and a high-dose corticosteroid treatment increased the risk by a factor of 1.07 ([95% CI: 0.53, 2.15], p = 0.85) compared to no treatment with glucocorticoids. The analysis reveals that corticosteroid treatment does not influence the survival of critically ill COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit within 35 days. Our evaluations further suggest that regardless of ventilation status, the decision-making process for administering corticosteroid therapy should account for the individual severity of the illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Angermair
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jan-Hendrik Hardenberg
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rubarth
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Balzer
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nilufar Akbari
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mario Menk
- Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Claudia Spies
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kai-Uwe Eckardt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Denis Poddubnyy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases, Rheumatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Britta Siegmund
- Division of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases, Rheumatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Schneider
- Division of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases, Rheumatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sascha Treskatsch
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Garcia-Vidal C, Teijón-Lumbreras C, Aiello TF, Chumbita M, Menendez R, Mateu-Subirà A, Peyrony O, Monzó P, Lopera C, Gallardo-Pizarro A, Méndez R, Calbo E, Xercavins M, Cuesta-Chasco G, Martínez JA, Marcos MA, Mensa J, Soriano A. K-Means Clustering Identifies Diverse Clinical Phenotypes in COVID-19 Patients: Implications for Mortality Risks and Remdesivir Impact. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:715-726. [PMID: 38489118 PMCID: PMC11058153 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-00938-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The impact of remdesivir on mortality in patients with COVID-19 is still controversial. We aimed to identify clinical phenotype clusters of COVID-19 hospitalized patients with highest benefit from remdesivir use and validate these findings in an external cohort. METHODS We included consecutive patients hospitalized between February 2020 and February 2021 for COVID-19. The derivation cohort comprised subjects admitted to Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. The validation cohort included patients from Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa (Terrassa) and Hospital Universitari La Fe (Valencia), all tertiary centers in Spain. We employed K-means clustering to group patients according to reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values and lymphocyte counts at diagnosis, and pre-test symptom duration. The impact of remdesivir on 60-day mortality in each cluster was assessed. RESULTS A total of 1160 patients (median age 66, interquartile range (IQR) 55-78) were included. We identified five clusters, with mortality rates ranging from 0 to 36.7%. Highest mortality rate was observed in the cluster including patients with shorter pre-test symptom duration, lower lymphocyte counts, and lower Ct values at diagnosis. The absence of remdesivir administration was associated with worse outcome in the high-mortality cluster (10.5% vs. 36.7%; p < 0.001), comprising subjects with higher viral loads. These results were validated in an external multicenter cohort of 981 patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients with COVID-19 exhibit varying mortality rates across different clinical phenotypes. K-means clustering aids in identifying patients who derive the greatest mortality benefit from remdesivir use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Garcia-Vidal
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
- CIBERINF, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Christian Teijón-Lumbreras
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tommaso Francesco Aiello
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Mariana Chumbita
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosario Menendez
- Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitari La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Aina Mateu-Subirà
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Peyrony
- Emergency Department, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Patricia Monzó
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Lopera
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gallardo-Pizarro
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raúl Méndez
- Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitari La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Esther Calbo
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariona Xercavins
- CATLAB. Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Genoveva Cuesta-Chasco
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, ISGLOBAL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José A Martínez
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBERINF, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ma Angeles Marcos
- CIBERINF, Barcelona, Spain
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, ISGLOBAL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Mensa
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alex Soriano
- Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBERINF, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang W, He Y, Gu Q, Zhang Y, Zha Q, Feng Q, Zhang S, He Y, Kang L, Xue M, Jing F, Li J, Mao Y, Zhu W. Optimal timing for awake prone positioning in Covid-19 patients: Insights from an observational study from two centers. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 152:104707. [PMID: 38368846 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The widespread application and interest in awake prone positioning stems from its ease and availability and its ability to enhance patients' oxygenation. Nevertheless, due to the absence of consensus over the regimen of awake prone positioning, the efficacy of awake prone positioning remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE To explore the optimal regimen for awake prone positioning, including the timing of initiation, ideal daily duration, and strategies for improving patient comfort and encouraging adherence. DESIGN Retrospective observational study. SETTING(S) Two university-affiliated hospitals in Shanghai. PARTICIPANTS Between December 2022 and February 2023, a total of 475 patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia who received awake prone positioning were observed. METHODS The data were collected from the hospital's electronic medical record system. The differentiation efficiency of peripheral blood oxygen saturation [SpO2]:fractional oxygen concentration in inspired air [FiO2] ratio at first awake prone positioning for different outcomes was tested by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze the relationship between time to occurrence of 28-day outcomes and collected variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted with the percentage of 28-day outcomes according to the SpO2:FiO2 ratio at first awake prone positioning after controlling covariates through Cox regression. RESULTS The best efficiency in predicting patient outcomes was achieved when the cutoff SpO2:FiO2 ratio at first awake prone positioning was 200. Patients with a reduced SpO2:FiO2 ratio (≤200) experienced more adverse respiratory outcomes (RR = 5.42, 95%CI [3.35, 8.76], p < 0·001) and higher mortality (RR = 16.64, 95%CI [5.53, 50.13], p < 0.001). Patients with a SpO2:FiO2 ratio of ≥200 at first awake prone positioning, longer duration between first awake prone positioning and admission, more awake prone positioning days, and better awake prone positioning completion were significantly protected from 28-day adverse respiratory outcomes and mortality. CONCLUSIONS Initiating awake prone positioning with a SpO2:FiO2 ratio exceeding 200, increasing the number of awake prone positioning days, prolonging the time between first awake prone positioning and admission, and achieving better completion of awake prone positioning were found to be significantly associated with reduced adverse respiratory outcomes and mortality. REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05795751; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiqing Zhang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Nursing, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan He
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiuying Gu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yin Zhang
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qinghua Zha
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Feng
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shiyu Zhang
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang He
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Kang
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Xue
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Jing
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinling Li
- Department of Pulmonary Circulation, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanjun Mao
- Department of Nursing, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.
| | - Weiyi Zhu
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Long MB, Abo-Leyah H, Giam YH, Vadiveloo T, Hull RC, Keir HR, Pembridge T, Alferes De Lima D, Delgado L, Inglis SK, Hughes C, Gilmour A, Gierlinski M, New BJ, MacLennan G, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Chalmers JD. SFX-01 in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. ERJ Open Res 2024; 10:00917-2023. [PMID: 38469377 PMCID: PMC10926007 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00917-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Sulforaphane can induce the transcription factor, Nrf2, promoting antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses. In this study, hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) were treated with stabilised synthetic sulforaphane (SFX-01) to evaluate impact on clinical status and inflammation. Methods Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of SFX-01 (300 mg oral capsule, once daily for 14 days) conducted in Dundee, UK, between November 2020 and May 2021. Patients had radiologically confirmed CAP and CURB-65 (confusion, urea >7 mmol·L-1, respiratory rate ≥30 breaths·min-1, blood pressure <90 mmHg (systolic) or ≤60 mmHg (diastolic), age ≥65 years) score ≥1. The primary outcome was the seven-point World Health Organization clinical status scale at day 15. Secondary outcomes included time to clinical improvement, length of stay and mortality. Effects on Nrf2 activity and inflammation were evaluated on days 1, 8 and 15 by measurement of 45 serum cytokines and mRNA sequencing of peripheral blood leukocytes. Results The trial was terminated prematurely due to futility with 133 patients enrolled. 65 patients were randomised to SFX-01 treatment and 68 patients to placebo. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was the cause of CAP in 103 (77%) cases. SFX-01 treatment did not improve clinical status at day 15 (adjusted OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.41-1.83; p=0.71), time to clinical improvement (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.70-1.49), length of stay (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.56-1.26) or 28-day mortality (aHR 1.45, 95% CI 0.67-3.16). The expression of Nrf2 targets and pro-inflammatory genes, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β and tumour necrosis factor-α, was not significantly changed by SFX-01 treatment. At days 8 and 15, respectively, 310 and 42 significant differentially expressed genes were identified between groups (false discovery rate adjusted p<0.05, log2FC >1). Conclusion SFX-01 treatment did not improve clinical status or modulate key Nrf2 targets in patients with CAP primarily due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merete B. Long
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- These authors contributed equally
| | - Hani Abo-Leyah
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- These authors contributed equally
| | - Yan Hui Giam
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Thenmalar Vadiveloo
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rebecca C. Hull
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Holly R. Keir
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Thomas Pembridge
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Daniela Alferes De Lima
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Lilia Delgado
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Sarah K. Inglis
- Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Chloe Hughes
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Amy Gilmour
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Marek Gierlinski
- Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Graeme MacLennan
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Albena T. Dinkova-Kostova
- Division of Cellular and Systems Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences and Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James D. Chalmers
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Janssen ML, Türk Y, Baart SJ, Hanselaar W, Aga Y, van der Steen-Dieperink M, van der Wal FJ, Versluijs VJ, Hoek RAS, Endeman H, Boer DP, Hoiting O, Hoelters J, Achterberg S, Stads S, Heller-Baan R, Dubois AVF, Elderman JH, Wils EJ. Safety and Outcome of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy Outside ICU Setting in Hypoxemic Patients With COVID-19. Crit Care Med 2024; 52:31-43. [PMID: 37855812 PMCID: PMC10715700 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is frequently applied outside ICU setting in hypoxemic patients with COVID-19. However, safety concerns limit more widespread use. We aimed to assess the safety and clinical outcomes of initiation of HFNO therapy in COVID-19 on non-ICU wards. DESIGN Prospective observational multicenter pragmatic study. SETTING Respiratory wards and ICUs of 10 hospitals in The Netherlands. PATIENTS Adult patients treated with HFNO for COVID-19-associated hypoxemia between December 2020 and July 2021 were included. Patients with treatment limitations were excluded from this analysis. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Outcomes included intubation and mortality rate, duration of hospital and ICU stay, severity of respiratory failure, and complications. Using propensity-matched analysis, we compared patients who initiated HFNO on the wards versus those in ICU. Six hundred eight patients were included, of whom 379 started HFNO on the ward and 229 in the ICU. The intubation rate in the matched cohort ( n = 214 patients) was 53% and 60% in ward and ICU starters, respectively ( p = 0.41). Mortality rates were comparable between groups (28-d [8% vs 13%], p = 0.28). ICU-free days were significantly higher in ward starters (21 vs 17 d, p < 0.001). No patient died before endotracheal intubation, and the severity of respiratory failure surrounding invasive ventilation and clinical outcomes did not differ between intubated ward and ICU starters (respiratory rate-oxygenation index 3.20 vs 3.38; Pa o2 :F io2 ratio 65 vs 64 mm Hg; prone positioning after intubation 81 vs 78%; mortality rate 17 vs 25% and ventilator-free days at 28 d 15 vs 13 d, all p values > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In this large cohort of hypoxemic patients with COVID-19, initiation of HFNO outside the ICU was safe, and clinical outcomes were similar to initiation in the ICU. Furthermore, the initiation of HFNO on wards saved time in ICU without excess mortality or complicated course. Our results indicate that HFNO initiation outside ICU should be further explored in other hypoxemic diseases and clinical settings aiming to preserve ICU capacity and healthcare costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs L Janssen
- Department of Intensive Care, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, Den Haag, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Ikazia Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ikazia Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Admiraal de Ruyter Ziekenhuis, Goes, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Yasemin Türk
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sara J Baart
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wessel Hanselaar
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yaar Aga
- Department of Intensive Care, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Vera J Versluijs
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier A S Hoek
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henrik Endeman
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk P Boer
- Department of Intensive Care, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Hoiting
- Department of Intensive Care, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jürgen Hoelters
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sefanja Achterberg
- Department of Intensive Care, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Stads
- Department of Intensive Care, Ikazia Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roxane Heller-Baan
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ikazia Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alain V F Dubois
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Admiraal de Ruyter Ziekenhuis, Goes, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H Elderman
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Evert-Jan Wils
- Department of Intensive Care, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferrandis R, Sierra P, Gomez-Luque A. COVID-19 thromboprophylaxis. New evidence. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2024; 71:34-47. [PMID: 37678450 DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Recent publications have questioned the efficacy of using therapeutic or intermediate doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in COVID-19 patients, especially in the most severe patients. In order to update these recommendations, a non-systematic review has been carried out in the main medical databases. A total of 14 randomized clinical trials, 14 meta-analyses and the recommendations of 12 scientific societies were selected, stratified according to the type of patient (outpatient, hospitalized, admitted to critical care or post-discharge). The efficacy of LMWH and other therapeutic approaches (rivaroxaban, apixaban, sulodexide, acetylsalicylic acid and P2Y12 inhibitors) has been analyzed. The findings recommend using standard doses of LMWH as thromboprophylaxis in critically hospitalized COVID-19 patients and therapeutic doses in non-critically hospitalized patients if the risk of bleeding is low. In outpatients and those discharged from the hospital, LMWH could be used at a prophylactic dose if there are thrombotic risk factors, and the bleeding risk is low. It is not recommended to associate antiplatelet agents with LMWH unless previously indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ferrandis
- Servicio de Anestesiología-Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, SEDAR, Valencia, Spain; SEDAR Haemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Division, Valencia, Spain
| | - P Sierra
- Servicio de Anestesiología-Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, SEDAR, Málaga, Spain; Servicio de Anestesiología-Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Fundació Puigvert, SEDAR, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Gomez-Luque
- SEDAR Haemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Division, Valencia, Spain; Servicio de Anestesiología-Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, SEDAR, Málaga, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wei D, Xie Y, Liu X, Chen R, Zhou M, Zhang X, Qu J. Pathogen evolution, prevention/control strategy and clinical features of COVID-19: experiences from China. Front Med 2023; 17:1030-1046. [PMID: 38157194 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-023-1043-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was reported at the end of 2019 as a worldwide health concern causing a pandemic of unusual viral pneumonia and many other organ damages, which was defined by the World Health Organization as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The pandemic is considered a significant threat to global public health till now. In this review, we have summarized the lessons learnt during the emergence and spread of SARS-CoV-2, including its prototype and variants. The overall clinical features of variants of concern (VOC), heterogeneity in the clinical manifestations, radiology and pathology of COVID-19 patients are also discussed, along with advances in therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Wei
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Research Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Yusang Xie
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
- Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Emergency Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Xuefei Liu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
- Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Emergency Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Rong Chen
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
- Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Emergency Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Min Zhou
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
- Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Emergency Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Xinxin Zhang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Research Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Jieming Qu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
- Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Emergency Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lorente-González M, Terán-Tinedo JR, Zevallos-Villegas A, Laorden D, Mariscal-Aguilar P, Suárez-Ortiz M, Cano-Sanz E, Ortega-Fraile MÁ, Hernández-Núñez J, Falcone A, Saiz-Lou EM, Plaza-Moreno MC, García-Fadul C, Valle-Falcones M, Sánchez-Azofra A, Funes-Moreno C, De-La-Calle-Gil I, Navarro-Casado R, Carballo-López D, Gholamian-Ovejero S, Gallego-Rodríguez B, Villén-Villegas T, Landete P. Severe SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia and Pneumomediastinum/Pneumothorax: A Prospective Observational Study in an Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit. J Intensive Care Med 2023; 38:1023-1041. [PMID: 37306158 PMCID: PMC10261956 DOI: 10.1177/08850666231180165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The occurrence of pneumomediastinum (PM) and/or pneumothorax (PTX) in patients with severe pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was evaluated. METHODS This was a prospective observational study conducted in patients admitted to the intermediate respiratory care unit (IRCU) of a COVID-19 monographic hospital in Madrid (Spain) between December 14, 2020 and September 28, 2021. All patients had a diagnosis of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and required noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS): high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP). The incidences of PM and/or PTX, overall and by NIRS, and their impact on the probabilities of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and death were studied. RESULTS A total of 1306 patients were included. 4.3% (56/1306) developed PM/PTX, 3.8% (50/1306) PM, 1.6% (21/1306) PTX, and 1.1% (15/1306) PM + PTX. 16.1% (9/56) of patients with PM/PTX had HFNC alone, while 83.9% (47/56) had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP. In comparison, 41.7% (521/1250) of patients without PM and PTX had HFNC alone (odds ratio [OR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.13-0.55; p < .001), while 58.3% (729/1250) had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.81-7.68; p < .001). The probability of needing IMV among patients with PM/PTX was 67.9% (36/53) (OR 7.46; 95% CI 4.12-13.50; p < .001), while it was 22.1% (262/1185) among patients without PM and PTX. Mortality among patients with PM/PTX was 33.9% (19/56) (OR 4.39; 95% CI 2.45-7.85; p < .001), while it was 10.5% (131/1250) among patients without PM and PTX. CONCLUSIONS In patients admitted to the IRCU for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring NIRS, incidences of PM/PTX, PM, PTX, and PM + PTX were observed to be 4.3%, 3.8%, 1.6%, and 1.1%, respectively. Most patients with PM/PTX had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP as the NIRS device, much more frequently than patients without PM and PTX. The probabilities of IMV and death among patients with PM/PTX were 64.3% and 33.9%, respectively, higher than those observed in patients without PM and PTX, which were 21.0% and 10.5%, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Lorente-González
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Rafael Terán-Tinedo
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Annette Zevallos-Villegas
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Laorden
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Mariscal-Aguilar
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Suárez-Ortiz
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduardo Cano-Sanz
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Ángeles Ortega-Fraile
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquín Hernández-Núñez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Adalgisa Falcone
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena María Saiz-Lou
- Department of Internal Medicine, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Cristina Plaza-Moreno
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Christian García-Fadul
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Valle-Falcones
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Sánchez-Azofra
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Clotilde Funes-Moreno
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel De-La-Calle-Gil
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosalía Navarro-Casado
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Carballo-López
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Soraya Gholamian-Ovejero
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Berta Gallego-Rodríguez
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tomás Villén-Villegas
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pedro Landete
- Department of Pneumology, Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal [Nurse Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid [Autónoma University of Madrid], Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Langford BJ, Leung V, Lo J, Akl EA, Nieuwlaat R, Lotfi T, Brown KA, Daneman N, Schwartz KL, Schünemann HJ. Antibiotic prescribing guideline recommendations in COVID-19: a systematic survey. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 65:102257. [PMID: 37842549 PMCID: PMC10568086 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are two intersecting public health crises. Antimicrobial overuse in patients with COVID-19 threatens to worsen AMR. Guidelines are fundamental in encouraging antimicrobial stewardship. We sought to assess the quality of antibiotic prescribing guidelines and recommendations in the context of COVID-19, and whether they incorporate principles of antimicrobial stewardship. Methods We performed a systematic survey which included a search using the concepts "antibiotic/antimicrobial" up to November 15, 2022 of the eCOVID-19 living map of recommendations (RecMap) which aggregates guidelines across a range of international sources and all languages. Guidelines providing explicit recommendations regarding antibacterial use in COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. Guideline and recommendation quality were assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX instruments, respectively. We extracted guideline characteristics including panel representation and the presence or absence of explicit statements related to antimicrobial stewardship (i.e., judicious antibiotic use, antimicrobial resistance or adverse effects as a consequence of antibiotic use). We used logistic regression to evaluate the relationship between guideline characteristics including quality and incorporation of antimicrobial stewardship principles. Protocol registration (OSF): https://osf.io/4pgtc. Findings Twenty-eight guidelines with 63 antibiotic prescribing recommendations were included. Recommendations focused on antibiotic initiation (n = 52, 83%) and less commonly antibiotic selection (n = 13, 21%), and duration of therapy (n = 15, 24%). Guideline and recommendation quality varied widely. Twenty (71%) guidelines incorporated at least one concept relating to antimicrobial stewardship. Including infectious diseases expertise on the guideline panel (OR 9.44, 97.5% CI: 1.09-81.59) and AGREE-REX score (OR 3.26, 97.5% CI: 1.14-9.31 per 10% increase in overall score) were associated with a higher odds of guidelines addressing antimicrobial stewardship. Interpretation There is an opportunity to improve antibiotic prescribing guidelines in terms of both quality and incorporation of antimicrobial stewardship principles. These findings can help guideline developers better address antibiotic stewardship in future recommendations beyond COVID-19. Funding This project was funded by Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J. Langford
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Valerie Leung
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer Lo
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Elie A. Akl
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Robby Nieuwlaat
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre, Hamilton, Canada
- McMaster GRADE Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Tamara Lotfi
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre, Hamilton, Canada
- McMaster GRADE Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Kevin A. Brown
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nick Daneman
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kevin L. Schwartz
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Holger J. Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre, Hamilton, Canada
- McMaster GRADE Centre, Hamilton, Canada
- Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Obradović D, Milovančev A, Plećaš Đurić A, Sovilj-Gmizić S, Đurović V, Šović J, Đurđević M, Tubić S, Bulajić J, Mišić M, Jojić J, Pušara M, Lazić I, Đurković M, Bek Pupovac R, Vulić A, Jozing M. High-Flow Nasal Cannula oxygen therapy in COVID-19: retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes - single center experience. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1244650. [PMID: 37849487 PMCID: PMC10577378 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1244650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy emerged as the therapy of choice in COVID-19-related pneumonia and moderate to severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). HFNC oxygen therapy in COVID-19 has been recommended based its use to treat AHRF of other etiologies, and studies on assessing outcomes in COVID-19 patients are highly needed. This study aimed to examine outcomes in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and severe AHRF treated with HFNC. Materials and methods The study included 235 COVID-19 patients with pneumonia treated with HFNC. Data extracted from medical records included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, clinical and oxygenation status, clinical complications, as well as the length of hospital stay. Patients were segregated into two groups based on their oxygen therapy needs: HDU group, those who exclusively required HFNC and ICU group, those whose oxygen therapy needed to be escalated at some point of hospital stay. The primary outcome was the need for respiratory support escalation (noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation) and the secondary outcome was the in-hospital all-cause mortality. Results The primary outcome was met in 113 (48%) of patients. The overall mortality was 70%, significantly higher in the ICU group [102 (90.2%) vs. 62 (50.1%), p < 0.001]. The rate of intrahospital infections was significantly higher in the ICU group while there were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay between the groups. The ICU group exhibited significant increases in D-dimer, NLR, and NEWS values, accompanied by a significant decrease in the SaO2/FiO2 ratio. The multivariable COX proportional regression analysis identified malignancy, higher levels of 4C Mortality Score and NEWS2 as significant predictors of mortality. Conclusion High-Flow Nasal Cannula oxygen therapy is a safe type of respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with significantly less possibility for emergence of intrahospital infections. In 52% of patients, HFNC was successful in treating AHRF in COVID-19 patients. Overall, mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia with AHRF is still very high, especially in patients treated with noninvasive/invasive mechanical ventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dušanka Obradović
- Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Aleksandra Milovančev
- Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Aleksandra Plećaš Đurić
- Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Clinic of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | | | - Vladimir Đurović
- Clinic of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Jovica Šović
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Miloš Đurđević
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Stevan Tubić
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Jelena Bulajić
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Milena Mišić
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Jovana Jojić
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Miroslava Pušara
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Ivana Lazić
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Mladen Đurković
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Renata Bek Pupovac
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Aleksandra Vulić
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Marija Jozing
- Urgent Care Center, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Marx K, Kalbitz S, Kellner N, Fedders M, Lübbert C. COVID-19 treatment strategies with drugs centrally procured by the German Federal Ministry of Health in a representative tertiary care hospital: a temporal analysis. GMS INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2023; 11:Doc03. [PMID: 37830112 PMCID: PMC10565843 DOI: 10.3205/id000083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Introduction To ensure the fastest and earliest possible treatment, the German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) initiated central procurement and nationwide distribution of new drugs against COVID-19. A single centre was used for a retrospective temporal analysis of this procedure. Methods A descriptive analysis of hospitalization and treatment of COVID-19 patients with drugs centrally procured by the BMG at St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany, for the period from 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2023 was employed considering the approval status, evolving guidelines and recommendations of medical societies. Results In total, 3,412 patients ≥18 years (54.9% men) with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were admitted. The mean age was 64 years during the reporting period and 66.1/70.6 years during the first and second COVID-19 waves, respectively. 964 patients (28.2%) received COVID-19 therapy with drugs procured centrally by the BMG. Remdesivir was the most commonly used (63%). SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies represented 23% of the therapies. Peroral antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir) were used in 14% of COVID-19 patients, with molnupiravir being insignificant (five prescriptions). Conclusions Specific therapeutic approaches were mainly based on antiviral therapy in the early phase of COVID-19 to prevent severe disease progression in vulnerable patient groups. Most drugs had not been approved at the time of central procurement; therefore, prescriptions were given on a case-by-case basis after careful risk-benefit assessments. All available neutralizing monoclonal SARS-CoV-2 antibodies lost efficacy during the pandemic due to different circulating immune escape variants. Remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir remained effective therapies in the early phase of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Marx
- Hospital Pharmacy, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sven Kalbitz
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nils Kellner
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maike Fedders
- Hospital Pharmacy, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christoph Lübbert
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Infectious Diseases, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gazezova S, Nabirova D, Detmar A, Smagul M, Kasabekova L, Zikriyarova S, Horth R. Therapies for people hospitalized with COVID-19 and alignment with national clinical guidelines in a large hospital, Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2020-2021. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1248959. [PMID: 37828941 PMCID: PMC10566366 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1248959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical practice guidelines were continually changing during the COVID-19 pandemic to reflect the best available evidence for a novel virus. In Kazakhstan, the national clinical guidelines for COVID-19 patient care were regularly modified and it was not known if and to what extent these guidelines were being followed in practice. Methods We conducted a sub-analysis of data collected from an observational study among people hospitalized with COVID-19 in a large infectious disease hospital in Almaty in four cross-sections of increased COVID-19 incidence: T1 (1 June-30 August 2020); T2 (1 October-31 December 2020); T3 (1 April-31 May 2021); and T4 (1 July-26 October 2021). Modifications to the national COVID-19 treatment guidelines were identified and clinical data were abstracted from electronic medical records. We assessed frequency of antibiotic, glucocorticoid, anticoagulant, and antiviral administered in each period and determined if these aligned with national clinical guidelines. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare practices across periods. Results Six modifications were made to national COVID-19 treatment guidelines during this study. Of 1,146 people hospitalized with COVID-19, 14% were in T1, 14% in T2, 22% in T3, and 50% in T4. Anticoagulant treatment was administered to 87% (range: 56%-95%), antibiotic treatment to 60% (range: 58%-64%), glucocorticoid to 55% (range: 43%-64%) and antiviral therapy 15% (range: 7%-22%). Majority of treatments were not aligned with national guidelines, including 98% of anticoagulant use, 95% of antibiotic use, 56% of glucocorticoid use, and 56% of antiviral use. There were no significant changes in practice following changes in guidelines for antibiotic use (64% in T1 to 58% in T2, p = 0.30). There was significant increase in use of anticoagulant (84% in T2 vs. 95% in T3, p < 0.01), glucocorticoid (43% in T2 vs. 64% in T3, p < 0.01), and antiviral treatment (7% in T3 vs. 15% in T4, p < 0.01) after guidelines updates. Conclusion The majority of treatments administered to people hospitalized with COVID-19 in four periods of high incidence in Almaty were not aligned with updated clinical guidelines. Antibiotic misuse was markedly high throughout. Increased awareness and training on clinical practice guidelines as updates are released may help improve adoption of evidence-based practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saya Gazezova
- Central Asia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Dilyara Nabirova
- Central Asia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- Division of Global Health Protection in Central Asia, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Ariana Detmar
- Division of Global Health Protection, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Manar Smagul
- Central Asia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Lena Kasabekova
- Central Asia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Sanam Zikriyarova
- Central Asia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Roberta Horth
- Central Asia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- Division of Global Health Protection in Central Asia, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kokkoris S, Kanavou A, Kremmydas P, Katsaros D, Karageorgiou S, Gkoufa A, Georgakopoulou VE, Spandidos DA, Giannopoulos C, Kardamitsi M, Routsi C. Temporal evolution of laboratory characteristics in patients critically ill with COVID‑19 admitted to the intensive care unit (Review). MEDICINE INTERNATIONAL 2023; 3:52. [PMID: 37810906 PMCID: PMC10557099 DOI: 10.3892/mi.2023.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
In the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), laboratory medicine has played a crucial role in both diagnosis and severity assessment. Although the importance of baseline laboratory findings has been extensively reported, data regarding their evolution over the clinical course are limited. The aim of the present narrative review was to provide the dynamic changes of the routine laboratory variables reported in patients with severe COVID-19 over the course of their critical illness. A search was made of the literature for articles providing data on the time-course of routine laboratory tests in patients with severe COVID-19 during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). White blood cell, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet counts, as well as D-dimer, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase and serum albumin levels were selected as disease characteristics and routine laboratory parameters. A total of 25 research articles reporting dynamic trends in the aforementioned laboratory parameters over the clinical course of severe COVID-19 were identified. During the follow-up period provided by each study, the majority of the laboratory values remained persistently abnormal in both survivors and non-survivors. Furthermore, in the majority of studies, the temporal trends of laboratory values distinctly differentiated patients between survivors and non-survivors. In conclusion, there are distinct temporal trends in selected routine laboratory parameters between survivors and non-survivors with severe COVID-19 admitted to the ICU, indicating their importance in the prognosis of clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stelios Kokkoris
- First Department of Intensive Care, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Angeliki Kanavou
- First Department of Intensive Care, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Kremmydas
- First Department of Intensive Care, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Katsaros
- First Department of Intensive Care, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Stavros Karageorgiou
- First Department of Intensive Care, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Aikaterini Gkoufa
- First Department of Intensive Care, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Demetrios A. Spandidos
- Laboratory of Clinical Virology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Charalampos Giannopoulos
- First Department of Intensive Care, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Marina Kardamitsi
- First Department of Intensive Care, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Christina Routsi
- First Department of Intensive Care, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Blair HA. Remdesivir: A Review in COVID-19. Drugs 2023; 83:1215-1237. [PMID: 37589788 PMCID: PMC10474216 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-023-01926-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Remdesivir (Veklury®), a nucleotide analogue prodrug with broad-spectrum antiviral activity, is approved for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Unlike some antivirals, remdesivir has a low potential for drug-drug interactions. In the pivotal ACTT-1 trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, daily intravenous infusions of remdesivir significantly reduced time to recovery relative to placebo. Subsequent trials provided additional support for the efficacy of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with moderate or severe COVID-19, with a greater benefit seen in patients with minimal oxygen requirements at baseline. Clinical trials also demonstrated the efficacy of remdesivir in other patient populations, including outpatients at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, as well as hospitalized paediatric patients. In terms of mortality, results were equivocal. However, remdesivir appeared to have a small mortality benefit in hospitalized patients who were not already being ventilated at baseline. Remdesivir was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, but pharmacovigilance data found an increased risk of hepatic, renal and cardiovascular adverse drug reactions in the real-world setting. In conclusion, remdesivir represents a useful treatment option for patients with COVID-19, particularly those who require supplemental oxygen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah A Blair
- Springer Nature, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ismail KB, Essafi F, Talik I, Slimene NB, Sdiri I, Dhia BB, Merhbene T. Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in Tunisia. Acute Crit Care 2023; 38:271-277. [PMID: 37652857 PMCID: PMC10497894 DOI: 10.4266/acc.2023.00591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we explored whether awake prone position (PP) can impact prognosis of severe hypoxemia coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. METHODS This was a prospective observational study of severe, critically ill adult COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Patients were divided into two groups: group G1, patients who benefited from a vigilant and effective PP (>4 hours minimum/24) and group G2, control group. We compared demographic, clinical, paraclinical and evolutionary data. RESULTS Three hundred forty-nine patients were hospitalized during the study period, 273 met the inclusion criteria. PP was performed in 192 patients (70.3%). The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, clinical severity and modalities of oxygenation at intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The mean PaO2/ FIO2 ratios were 141 and 128 mm Hg, respectively (P=0.07). The computed tomography scan was comparable with a critical >75% in 48.5% (G1) versus 54.2% (G2). The median duration of the daily PP session was 13±7 hours per day. The average duration of spontaneous PP days was 7 days (4-19). Use of invasive ventilation was lower in the G1 group (27% vs. 56%, P=0.002). Healthcare-associated infections were significantly lower in G1 (42.1% vs. 82%, P=0.01). Duration of total mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay were comparable between the two groups. Mortality was significantly higher in G2 (64% vs. 28%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Our study confirmed that awake PP can improve prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaoula Ben Ismail
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital of Zaghouan and Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Zaghouan, Tunisia
- Research Unit for Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation UR22SP01, Abderrahmen Mami Hospital, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Ariana, Tunisia
| | - Fatma Essafi
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital of Zaghouan and Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Zaghouan, Tunisia
- Research Unit for Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation UR22SP01, Abderrahmen Mami Hospital, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Ariana, Tunisia
| | - Imen Talik
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital of Zaghouan and Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Zaghouan, Tunisia
| | - Najla Ben Slimene
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital of Zaghouan and Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Zaghouan, Tunisia
- Research Unit for Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation UR22SP01, Abderrahmen Mami Hospital, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Ariana, Tunisia
| | - Ines Sdiri
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital of Zaghouan and Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Zaghouan, Tunisia
| | - Boudour Ben Dhia
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital of Zaghouan and Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Zaghouan, Tunisia
| | - Takoua Merhbene
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital of Zaghouan and Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Zaghouan, Tunisia
- Research Unit for Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation UR22SP01, Abderrahmen Mami Hospital, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Ariana, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Favilli A, Mattei Gentili M, De Paola F, Laganà AS, Vitagliano A, Bosco M, Cicinelli E, Chiantera V, Uccella S, Parazzini F, Gerli S, Garzon S. COVID-19 and Pregnancy: An Updated Review about Evidence-Based Therapeutic Strategies. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1035. [PMID: 37511648 PMCID: PMC10381390 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic posed a significant challenge for clinicians in managing pregnant women, who were at high risk of virus transmission and severe illness. While the WHO declared in May 2023 that COVID-19 is no longer a public health emergency, it emphasized that it remains a global health threat. Despite the success of vaccines, the possibility of new pandemic waves due to viral mutations should be considered. Ongoing assessment of the safety and effectiveness of pharmacological therapies is crucial in clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes the evidence-based therapeutic strategies for pregnant women with COVID-19, considering over three years of pandemic experience. The review discusses the safety and effectiveness of various drug regimens (antivirals, anticoagulants, corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, monoclonal antibodies, and therapeutic gases) and procedures (prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). Drugs with contraindications, inefficacy during pregnancy, or unknown adverse effects were excluded from our evaluation. The aim is to provide healthcare professionals with a comprehensive guide for managing pregnant women with COVID-19 based on lessons learned from the pandemic outbreak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Favilli
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - Marta Mattei Gentili
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - Francesca De Paola
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Amerigo Vitagliano
- Department of Biomedical and Human Oncological Science (DIMO), 1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Mariachiara Bosco
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology-Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, AOUI Verona-University of Verona Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Ettore Cicinelli
- Department of Biomedical and Human Oncological Science (DIMO), 1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Stefano Uccella
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology-Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, AOUI Verona-University of Verona Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Parazzini
- Department of Clinic and Community Science, Mangiagalli Hospital, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sandro Gerli
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - Simone Garzon
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology-Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, AOUI Verona-University of Verona Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jacquet-Lagrèze M, Riad Z, Portran P, Chesnel D, Schweizer R, Ferarris A, Jacquemet L, Ruste M, Fellahi JL. Hemodynamic Effects of Awake Prone Positioning With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Failure. Respir Care 2023; 68:713-720. [PMID: 37225655 PMCID: PMC10208996 DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Awake prone positioning (PP) reduces need for intubation for patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. We investigated the hemodynamic effects of awake PP in non-ventilated subjects with COVID-19 acute respiratory failure. METHODS We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study. Adult hypoxemic subjects with COVID-19 not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation receiving at least one PP session were included. Hemodynamic assessment was done with transthoracic echocardiography before, during, and after a PP session. RESULTS Twenty-six subjects were included. We observed a significant and reversible increase in cardiac index (CI) during PP compared to supine position (SP): 3.0 ± 0.8 L/min/m2 in PP, 2.5 ± 0.6 L/min/m2 before PP (SP1), and 2.6 ± 0.5 L/min/m2 after PP (SP2, P < .001). A significant improvement in right ventricular (RV) systolic function was also evidenced during PP: The RV fractional area change was 36 ± 10% in SP1, 46 ± 10% during PP, and 35 ± 8% in SP2 (P < .001). There was no significant difference in PaO2 /FIO2 and breathing frequency. CONCLUSION CI and RV systolic function are improved by awake PP in non-ventilated subjects with COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France; Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; and CarMeN Laboratory, Inserm UMR 1060, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
| | - Zakaria Riad
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France; and Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Philippe Portran
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Delphine Chesnel
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Rémi Schweizer
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Arnaud Ferarris
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France; and Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Louis Jacquemet
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Martin Ruste
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France; and Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Luc Fellahi
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France; Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; and CarMeN Laboratory, Inserm UMR 1060, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jalil Y, Ferioli M, Dres M. The COVID-19 Driving Force: How It Shaped the Evidence of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103486. [PMID: 37240592 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) became crucial in treating patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Despite the fear of viral aerosolization, non-invasive respiratory support has gained attention as a way to alleviate ICU overcrowding and reduce the risks associated with intubation. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented increased demand for research, resulting in numerous publications on observational studies, clinical trials, reviews, and meta-analyses in the past three years. This comprehensive narrative overview describes the physiological rationale, pre-COVID-19 evidence, and results of observational studies and randomized control trials regarding the use of high-flow nasal oxygen, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, and continuous positive airway pressure in adult patients with COVID-19 and associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The review also highlights the significance of guidelines and recommendations provided by international societies and the need for further well-designed research to determine the optimal use of NIRS in treating this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yorschua Jalil
- INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation (Département "R3S"), AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile
- Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Kinesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile
| | - Martina Ferioli
- INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation (Département "R3S"), AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France
- Respiratory and Critical Care Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Integrated and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Martin Dres
- INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation (Département "R3S"), AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gudima G, Kofiadi I, Shilovskiy I, Kudlay D, Khaitov M. Antiviral Therapy of COVID-19. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24108867. [PMID: 37240213 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24108867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the scientific community has focused on prophylactic vaccine development. In parallel, the experience of the pharmacotherapy of this disease has increased. Due to the declining protective capacity of vaccines against new strains, as well as increased knowledge about the structure and biology of the pathogen, control of the disease has shifted to the focus of antiviral drug development over the past year. Clinical data on safety and efficacy of antivirals acting at various stages of the virus life cycle has been published. In this review, we summarize mechanisms and clinical efficacy of antiviral therapy of COVID-19 with drugs based on plasma of convalescents, monoclonal antibodies, interferons, fusion inhibitors, nucleoside analogs, and protease inhibitors. The current status of the drugs described is also summarized in relation to the official clinical guidelines for the treatment of COVID-19. In addition, here we describe innovative drugs whose antiviral effect is provided by antisense oligonucleotides targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Analysis of laboratory and clinical data suggests that current antivirals successfully combat broad spectra of emerging strains of SARS-CoV-2 providing reliable defense against COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgii Gudima
- NRC Institute of Immunology, Federal Medico-Biological Agency, 115522 Moscow, Russia
| | - Ilya Kofiadi
- NRC Institute of Immunology, Federal Medico-Biological Agency, 115522 Moscow, Russia
- Department of Immunology, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Igor Shilovskiy
- NRC Institute of Immunology, Federal Medico-Biological Agency, 115522 Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry Kudlay
- NRC Institute of Immunology, Federal Medico-Biological Agency, 115522 Moscow, Russia
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Musa Khaitov
- NRC Institute of Immunology, Federal Medico-Biological Agency, 115522 Moscow, Russia
- Department of Immunology, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Qin S, Chang W, Peng F, Hu Z, Yang Y. Awake prone position in COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Pulm Med 2023; 23:145. [PMID: 37101160 PMCID: PMC10131466 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02442-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate the effects of awake prone positioning (APP) in nonintubated adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register databases were searched up to June 1, 2022. All randomized trials investigating the effects of APP were included in the present meta-analysis. The primary outcome was intubation rate, and the secondary outcomes included the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, and mortality. Prescribed subgroup analysis was also conducted. RESULTS A total of 10 randomized trials enrolling 2324 patients were ultimately included in the present study. The results indicated that APP was associated with a significant reduction in the intubation rate (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.93, P = 0.007). However, no differences could be observed in the length of ICU stay or hospitalization or mortality. Subgroup analysis suggested that patients in the ICU settings (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.91, P = 0.004), patients whose median APP time was more than 4 h (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.93, P = 0.008), and patients with an average baseline SpO2 to FiO2 ratio less than 200 (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92) were more likely to benefit from APP, indicated a significantly reduced intubation rate. CONCLUSION Based on the current evidence, nonintubated adult patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 infection who underwent APP were shown to have a significantly reduced intubation rate. However, no differences in ICU or hospital length of stay or mortality could be observed between APP and usual care. REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022337846.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Qin
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Wei Chang
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Fei Peng
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Zihan Hu
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Reyes LF, Rodriguez A, Fuentes YV, Duque S, García-Gallo E, Bastidas A, Serrano-Mayorga CC, Ibáñez-Prada ED, Moreno G, Ramirez-Valbuena PC, Ospina-Tascon G, Hernandez G, Silva E, Díaz AM, Jibaja M, Vera-Alarcon M, Díaz E, Bodí M, Solé-Violán J, Ferrer R, Albaya-Moreno A, Socias L, Figueroa W, Lozano-Villanueva JL, Varón-Vega F, Estella Á, Loza-Vazquez A, Jorge-García R, Sancho I, Shankar-Hari M, Martin-Loeches I. Risk factors for developing ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection in patients with severe COVID-19: a multinational, multicentre study, prospective, observational study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:6553. [PMID: 37085552 PMCID: PMC10119842 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32265-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Around one-third of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 develop a severe illness that requires admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In clinical practice, clinicians have learned that patients admitted to the ICU due to severe COVID-19 frequently develop ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (VA-LRTI). This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, the factors associated with VA-LRTI, and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19. This was a multicentre, observational cohort study conducted in ten countries in Latin America and Europe. We included patients with confirmed rtPCR for SARS-CoV-2 requiring ICU admission and endotracheal intubation. Only patients with a microbiological and clinical diagnosis of VA-LRTI were included. Multivariate Logistic regression analyses and Random Forest were conducted to determine the risk factors for VA-LRTI and its clinical impact in patients with severe COVID-19. In our study cohort of 3287 patients, VA-LRTI was diagnosed in 28.8% [948/3287]. The cumulative incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was 18.6% [610/3287], followed by ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) 10.3% [338/3287]. A total of 1252 bacteria species were isolated. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21.2% [266/1252]), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.1% [239/1252]) and Staphylococcus aureus (15.5% [194/1,252]). The factors independently associated with the development of VA-LRTI were prolonged stay under invasive mechanical ventilation, AKI during ICU stay, and the number of comorbidities. Regarding the clinical impact of VA-LRTI, patients with VAP had an increased risk of hospital mortality (OR [95% CI] of 1.81 [1.40-2.34]), while VAT was not associated with increased hospital mortality (OR [95% CI] of 1.34 [0.98-1.83]). VA-LRTI, often with difficult-to-treat bacteria, is frequent in patients admitted to the ICU due to severe COVID-19 and is associated with worse clinical outcomes, including higher mortality. Identifying risk factors for VA-LRTI might allow the early patient diagnosis to improve clinical outcomes.Trial registration: This is a prospective observational study; therefore, no health care interventions were applied to participants, and trial registration is not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Felipe Reyes
- Unisabana Center for Translational Science, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
- Clinica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
- Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Alejandro Rodriguez
- Critical Care Department, URV/IISPV/CIBERES, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Yuli V Fuentes
- Unisabana Center for Translational Science, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
- Clinica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | - Sara Duque
- Unisabana Center for Translational Science, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | - Esteban García-Gallo
- Unisabana Center for Translational Science, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | - Alirio Bastidas
- Unisabana Center for Translational Science, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | - Cristian C Serrano-Mayorga
- Unisabana Center for Translational Science, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
- Clinica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | - Elsa D Ibáñez-Prada
- Unisabana Center for Translational Science, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | - Gerard Moreno
- Critical Care Department, URV/IISPV/CIBERES, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain
| | | | | | - Glenn Hernandez
- Critical Care Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Ana Maria Díaz
- Eugenio Espejo Hospital of Specialties, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador
| | - Manuel Jibaja
- Eugenio Espejo Hospital of Specialties, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador
| | | | - Emili Díaz
- Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain
| | - María Bodí
- Critical Care Department, URV/IISPV/CIBERES, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Jordi Solé-Violán
- Hospital Universitario Dr Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
- Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - Ricard Ferrer
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Lorenzo Socias
- Son Llatzer University Hospital, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - William Figueroa
- Unisabana Center for Translational Science, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | | | | | - Ángel Estella
- Jerez University Hospital, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
| | - Ana Loza-Vazquez
- Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Valme, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Isabel Sancho
- Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Manu Shankar-Hari
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Inflammation Research, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Ignacio Martin-Loeches
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St. James's Hospital, Dublin, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mathioudakis AG, Khaleva E, Fally M, Williamson PR, Jensen JU, Felton TW, Brightling C, Bush A, Winders T, Linnell J, Ramiconi V, Coleman C, Welte T, Roberts G, Vestbo J. Core outcome sets, developed collaboratively with patients, can improve the relevance and comparability of clinical trials. Eur Respir J 2023; 61:61/4/2202107. [PMID: 37012082 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02107-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander G Mathioudakis
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- A.G. Mathioudakis, E. Khaleva and M. Fally contributed equally to this work
| | - Ekaterina Khaleva
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- A.G. Mathioudakis, E. Khaleva and M. Fally contributed equally to this work
| | - Markus Fally
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
- A.G. Mathioudakis, E. Khaleva and M. Fally contributed equally to this work
| | - Paula R Williamson
- Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, MRC/NIHR Trials Methodology Research Partnership, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jens-Ulrik Jensen
- Department of Medicine, Section of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tim W Felton
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Acute Intensive Care Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Brightling
- Institute for Lung Health, Leicester NIHR BRC, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Andrew Bush
- Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tonya Winders
- Allergy and Asthma Network, Vienna, VA, USA
- Global Allergy and Airways Patient Platform, Vienna, VA, USA
| | - John Linnell
- European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients' Associations, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Valeria Ramiconi
- European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients' Associations, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Tobias Welte
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and German Centre of Lung Research (DZL), Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Graham Roberts
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Vestbo
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Conlon TM, Yildirim AÖ. Oxysterol metabolism dictates macrophage influx during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur Respir J 2023; 61:13993003.02417-2022. [PMID: 36858446 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02417-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Conlon
- Institute of Lung Health and Immunity (LHI), Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC), Helmholtz Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Ali Önder Yildirim
- Institute of Lung Health and Immunity (LHI), Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC), Helmholtz Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Xiang M, Wu X, Jing H, Novakovic VA, Shi J. The intersection of obesity and (long) COVID-19: Hypoxia, thrombotic inflammation, and vascular endothelial injury. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1062491. [PMID: 36824451 PMCID: PMC9941162 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1062491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of hypoxia, vascular endothelial injury, and thrombotic inflammation in worsening COVID-19 symptoms has been generally recognized. Damaged vascular endothelium plays a crucial role in forming in situ thrombosis, pulmonary dysfunction, and hypoxemia. Thrombotic inflammation can further aggravate local vascular endothelial injury and affect ventilation and blood flow ratio. According to the results of many studies, obesity is an independent risk factor for a variety of severe respiratory diseases and contributes to high mechanical ventilation rate, high mortality, and slow recovery in COVID-19 patients. This review will explore the mechanisms by which obesity may aggravate the acute phase of COVID-19 and delay long COVID recovery by affecting hypoxia, vascular endothelial injury, and thrombotic inflammation. A systematic search of PubMed database was conducted for papers published since January 2020, using the medical subject headings of "COVID-19" and "long COVID" combined with the following keywords: "obesity," "thrombosis," "endothelial injury," "inflammation," "hypoxia," "treatment," and "anticoagulation." In patients with obesity, the accumulation of central fat restricts the expansion of alveoli, exacerbating the pulmonary dysfunction caused by SARS-CoV-2 invasion, inflammatory damage, and lung edema. Abnormal fat secretion and immune impairment further aggravate the original tissue damage and inflammation diffusion. Obesity weakens baseline vascular endothelium function leading to an early injury and pre-thrombotic state after infection. Enhanced procoagulant activity and microthrombi promote early obstruction of the vascular. Obesity also prolongs the duration of symptoms and increases the risk of sequelae after hospital discharge. Persistent viral presence, long-term inflammation, microclots, and hypoxia may contribute to the development of persistent symptoms, suggesting that patients with obesity are uniquely susceptible to long COVID. Early interventions, including supplemental oxygen, comprehensive antithrombotic therapy, and anti-inflammatory drugs, show effectiveness in many studies in the prevention of serious hypoxia, thromboembolic events, and systemic inflammation, and are therefore recommended to reduce intensive care unit admission, mortality, and sequelae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengqi Xiang
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xiaoming Wu
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Haijiao Jing
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Valerie A. Novakovic
- Department of Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jialan Shi
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China,Department of Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States,*Correspondence: Jialan Shi, ,
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in significant mortality in pandemic proportions. Inflammation in response to the infection contributes to the pathogenesis of pneumonia. This review will discuss prior studies on the use of glucocorticoids to treat respiratory infections, the rationale for the use glucocorticoids in COVID-19, and review of existing data. We will also highlight outstanding research questions for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Amati
- Respiratory Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Tonutti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - John Huston
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Center for Pulmonary Infection Research and Treatment, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Charles S. Dela Cruz
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Center for Pulmonary Infection Research and Treatment, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Newly Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Does Inclusion of High Flow Nasal Cannula Solve the Problem? J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12031043. [PMID: 36769691 PMCID: PMC9917973 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common life-threatening clinical syndrome which accounts for 10% of intensive care unit admissions. Since the Berlin definition was developed, the clinical diagnosis and therapy have changed dramatically by adding a minimum positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the assessment of hypoxemia compared to the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) definition in 1994. High-flow nasal cannulas (HFNC) have become widely used as an effective respiratory support for hypoxemia to the extent that their use was proposed in the expansion of the ARDS criteria. However, there would be problems if the diagnosis of a specific disease or clinical syndrome occurred, based on therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
|
31
|
Kaczyńska K, Jampolska M, Wojciechowski P, Sulejczak D, Andrzejewski K, Zając D. Potential of Lactoferrin in the Treatment of Lung Diseases. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:192. [PMID: 37259341 PMCID: PMC9960651 DOI: 10.3390/ph16020192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Lactoferrin (LF) is a multifunctional iron-binding glycoprotein that exhibits a variety of properties, such as immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anticancer, that can be used to treat numerous diseases. Lung diseases continue to be the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Many of the therapies currently used to treat these diseases have limited efficacy or are associated with side effects. Therefore, there is a constant pursuit for new drugs and therapies, and LF is frequently considered a therapeutic agent and/or adjunct to drug-based therapies for the treatment of lung diseases. This article focuses on a review of the existing and most up-to-date literature on the contribution of the beneficial effects of LF on the treatment of lung diseases, including asthma, viral infections, cystic fibrosis, or lung cancer, among others. Although in vitro and in vivo studies indicate significant potency of LF in the treatment of the listed diseases, only in the case of respiratory tract infections do human studies seem to confirm them by demonstrating the effectiveness of LF in reducing episodes of illness and shortening the recovery period. For lung cancer, COVID-19 and sepsis, the reports are conflicting, and for other diseases, there is a paucity of human studies conclusively confirming the beneficial effects of LF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Kaczyńska
- Department of Respiration Physiology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5 St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Monika Jampolska
- Department of Respiration Physiology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5 St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Wojciechowski
- Department of Respiration Physiology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5 St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dorota Sulejczak
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5 St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kryspin Andrzejewski
- Department of Respiration Physiology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5 St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dominika Zając
- Department of Respiration Physiology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5 St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Plocque A, Mitri C, Lefèvre C, Tabary O, Touqui L, Philippart F. Should We Interfere with the Interleukin-6 Receptor During COVID-19: What Do We Know So Far? Drugs 2023; 83:1-36. [PMID: 36508116 PMCID: PMC9743129 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01803-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Severe manifestations of COVID-19 consist of acute respiratory distress syndrome due to an initially local reaction leading to a systemic inflammatory response that results in hypoxia. Many therapeutic approaches have been attempted to reduce the clinical consequences of an excessive immune response to viral infection. To date, systemic corticosteroid therapy is still the most effective intervention. More recently, new hope has emerged with the use of interleukin (IL)-6 receptor inhibitors (tocilizumab and sarilumab). However, the great heterogeneity of the methodology and results of published studies obfuscate the true value of this treatment, leading to a confusing synthesis in recent meta-analyses, and the persistence of doubts in terms of patient groups and the appropriate time to treat. Moreover, their effects on the anti-infectious or pro-healing response are still poorly studied. This review aims to clarify the potential role of IL-6 receptor inhibitors in the treatment of severe forms of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexia Plocque
- Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | - Christie Mitri
- Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, 75012, Paris, France
| | - Charlène Lefèvre
- Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Tabary
- Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, 75012, Paris, France
| | - Lhousseine Touqui
- INSERM U938 Unit, St. Antoine Research Centre, Sorbona University, Paris, France
- Mucoviscidosis and Pulmonary Disease Units, Institute Pasteur, Paris, France
- Cystic fibrosis and Bronchial diseases team-INSERM U938, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
| | - Francois Philippart
- Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
- Endotoxins, Structures and Host Response, Department of Microbiology, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell, UMR 9891 CNRS-CEA-Paris Saclay University, 98190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with remdesivir: a retrospective analysis of a large tertiary care center in Germany. Infection 2023; 51:97-108. [PMID: 35553032 PMCID: PMC9098143 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-022-01841-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The benefits of antiviral treatment with remdesivir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remain controversial. Clinical analyses are needed to demonstrate which patient populations are most likely to benefit. METHODS In a retrospective monocentric analysis, patients with COVID-19 treated between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021 at Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany were evaluated. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement, and the secondary endpoint was 28-day mortality. Propensity score matching was used for the endpoint analysis. RESULTS A total of 839 patients were fully evaluated, 68% of whom received specific COVID-19 drug therapy. Remdesivir was used in 31.3% of the patients, corticosteroids in 61.7%, and monoclonal antibodies in 2.3%. While dexamethasone administration was the most common therapeutic approach during the second pandemic wave, combination therapy with remdesivir and corticosteroids predominated during the third wave. Cox regression analysis revealed that combination therapy was not associated with faster clinical improvement (median: 13 days in both matched groups, HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.77-1.21], P = 0.762). By contrast, 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the corticosteroid-remdesivir group (14.8% versus 22.2% in the corticosteroid group, HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.95], P = 0.03) in the low-care setting. This effect was also demonstrated in a subgroup analysis of patients with remdesivir monotherapy (n = 44) versus standard of care (SOC). CONCLUSION In COVID-19 patients with only mild disease (low-flow oxygen therapy and treatment in a normal ward) who received corticosteroids and/or remdesivir in addition to SOC, early administration of remdesivir was associated with a measurable survival benefit.
Collapse
|
34
|
Cilloniz C, Luna CM, Hurtado JC, Marcos MÁ, Torres A. Respiratory viruses: their importance and lessons learned from COVID-19. Eur Respir Rev 2022; 31:31/166/220051. [PMID: 36261158 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0051-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Respiratory virus infection can cause severe illnesses capable of inducing acute respiratory failure that can progress rapidly to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is related to poor outcomes, especially in individuals with a higher risk of infection, such as the elderly and those with comorbidities, i.e. obesity, asthma, diabetes mellitus and chronic respiratory or cardiovascular disease. Despite this, effective antiviral treatments available for severe viral lung infections are scarce. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demonstrated that there is also a need to understand the role of airborne transmission of respiratory viruses. Robust evidence supporting this exists, but better comprehension could help implement adequate measures to mitigate respiratory viral infections. In severe viral lung infections, early diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis are essential in managing patients. Biomarkers can provide reliable, timely and accessible information possibly helpful for clinicians in managing severe lung viral infections. Although respiratory viruses highly impact global health, more research is needed to improve care and prognosis of severe lung viral infections. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical characteristics, management and prognosis of patients with severe infections due to respiratory viruses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catia Cilloniz
- Pneumology Dept, Respiratory Institute, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain .,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (Ciberes), Barcelona, Spain.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Continental University, Huancayo, Peru
| | - Carlos M Luna
- Pneumology Division, Hospital of Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan Carlos Hurtado
- Dept of Microbiology, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Ángeles Marcos
- Dept of Microbiology, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Torres
- Pneumology Dept, Respiratory Institute, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (Ciberes), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Elly USMAN, Yusticia KATAR. THE ROLE OF AGE AND COMORBIDITIES ON THE OUTCOME OF CONFIRMED CLINICALLY CRITICAL COVID-19 PATIENTS TREATED WITH REMDESIVIR AT INDONESIA'S NATIONAL REFERRAL HOSPITAL. Afr J Infect Dis 2022; 17:55-59. [PMID: 36756490 PMCID: PMC9885022 DOI: 10.21010/ajidv17i1.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is currently no viable pharmaceutical therapy for COVID-19 illness that has been validated. The use of remdesivir is one of the medications for which there is no consistent evidence of a significant therapeutic benefit or a meaningful effect on survival. Aim The aim of this study was to determine the role of age and comorbidities on the outcome of confirmed clinically critical COVID-19 patients treated with remdesivir at Indonesia's National Referral Hospital. Methods A retrospective cohort study was used in this study. The subjects in this study were confirmed clinically critical COVID-19 patients who were treated at Dr. M Djamil Hospital Padang, one of Indonesia's national referral hospitals, from January 2 to June 30, 2021. The number of sample size in this study was 90 patients. The variables of this study were divided into three independent variables (age, comorbidities, and a number of comorbidities). A dependent variable was the outcome of confirmed clinically critical COVID-19 patients. The Chi-square test was performed in bivariate analysis, and the odds ratio was calculated. SPSS version 17.0 was used to analyze the data. Results The results of this study found that there was an association between ages 50-59 years (OR = 10.23, 95% CI 1.89-55.53), 60-69 years (OR = 4.58, 95% CI 1.25-16.76), and > 70 years (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.38 -9.59), comorbid diabetes mellitus (OR = 9.78, 95% CI 1.23-77.66), the number of comorbid > 1 (OR = 10.97, 95% CI 2.19-54.96, and the number of comorbid 1 (OR = 5.69, 95% CI 1.59- 20.41) with the outcome of confirmed clinically critical COVID-19 patients treated with remdesivir. Conclusion The significance of age and comorbidities on the outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with remdesivir at Indonesia's national referral hospital was confirmed in this study. This study could assist in the management of patient therapy, potentially decreasing morbidity and even patient mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- USMAN Elly
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia,Corresponding author E-mail:
| | - KATAR Yusticia
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Providing respiratory and ventilation care in the face of shifting evidence: current opinion in critical care. Curr Opin Crit Care 2022; 28:660-666. [PMID: 36302195 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the clinical problem and noninvasive treatments of hypoxemia in critically-ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia and describe recent advances in evidence supporting bedside decision making. RECENT FINDINGS High-flow nasal oxygen and noninvasive ventilation, along with awake prone positioning are potentially helpful therapies for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy has been widely implemented as a form of oxygen support supported by prepandemic randomized controlled trials showing possible benefit over noninvasive ventilation. Given the sheer volume of patients, noninvasive ventilation was often required, and based on a well conducted randomized controlled trial there was a developing role for helmet-interface noninvasive. Coupled with noninvasive supports, the use of awake prone positioning demonstrated physiological benefits, but randomized controlled trial data did not demonstrate clear outcome superiority. SUMMARY The use of noninvasive oxygen strategies and our understanding of the proposed mechanisms are evolving. Variability in patient severity and physiology may dictate a personalized approach to care. High-flow nasal oxygen may be paired with awake and spontaneously breathing prone-positioning to optimize oxygen and lung mechanics but requires further insight before widely applying to clinical practice.
Collapse
|
37
|
Keir HR, Long MB, Abo-Leyah H, Giam YH, Vadiveloo T, Pembridge T, Hull RC, Delgado L, Band M, McLaren-Neil F, Adamson S, Lahnsteiner E, Gilmour A, Hughes C, New BJ, Connell D, Dowey R, Turton H, Richardson H, Cassidy D, Cooper J, Suntharalingam J, Diwakar L, Russell P, Underwood J, Hicks A, Dosanjh DP, Sage B, Dhasmana D, Spears M, Thompson AR, Brightling C, Smith A, Patel M, George J, Condliffe AM, Shoemark A, MacLennan G, Chalmers JD. Dipeptidyl peptidase-1 inhibition in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2022; 10:1119-1128. [PMID: 36075243 PMCID: PMC9442496 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00261-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neutrophil serine proteases are involved in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and increased serine protease activity has been reported in severe and fatal infection. We investigated whether brensocatib, an inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-1 (DPP-1; an enzyme responsible for the activation of neutrophil serine proteases), would improve outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. METHODS In a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial, across 14 hospitals in the UK, patients aged 16 years and older who were hospitalised with COVID-19 and had at least one risk factor for severe disease were randomly assigned 1:1, within 96 h of hospital admission, to once-daily brensocatib 25 mg or placebo orally for 28 days. Patients were randomly assigned via a central web-based randomisation system (TruST). Randomisation was stratified by site and age (65 years or ≥65 years), and within each stratum, blocks were of random sizes of two, four, or six patients. Participants in both groups continued to receive other therapies required to manage their condition. Participants, study staff, and investigators were masked to the study assignment. The primary outcome was the 7-point WHO ordinal scale for clinical status at day 29 after random assignment. The intention-to-treat population included all patients who were randomly assigned and met the enrolment criteria. The safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication. This study was registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN30564012. FINDINGS Between June 5, 2020, and Jan 25, 2021, 406 patients were randomly assigned to brensocatib or placebo; 192 (47·3%) to the brensocatib group and 214 (52·7%) to the placebo group. Two participants were excluded after being randomly assigned in the brensocatib group (214 patients included in the placebo group and 190 included in the brensocatib group in the intention-to-treat population). Primary outcome data was unavailable for six patients (three in the brensocatib group and three in the placebo group). Patients in the brensocatib group had worse clinical status at day 29 after being randomly assigned than those in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·57-0·92]). Prespecified subgroup analyses of the primary outcome supported the primary results. 185 participants reported at least one adverse event; 99 (46%) in the placebo group and 86 (45%) in the brensocatib group. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders and infections. One death in the placebo group was judged as possibly related to study drug. INTERPRETATION Brensocatib treatment did not improve clinical status at day 29 in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. FUNDING Sponsored by the University of Dundee and supported through an Investigator Initiated Research award from Insmed, Bridgewater, NJ; STOP-COVID19 trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly R Keir
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Merete B Long
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Hani Abo-Leyah
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Yan Hui Giam
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Thomas Pembridge
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Rebecca C Hull
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lilia Delgado
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Margaret Band
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Simon Adamson
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Eva Lahnsteiner
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Amy Gilmour
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Chloe Hughes
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Benjamin Jm New
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - David Connell
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Rebecca Dowey
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helena Turton
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Diane Cassidy
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark Spears
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Aa Roger Thompson
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jacob George
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Alison M Condliffe
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Amelia Shoemark
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - James D Chalmers
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bellino S. COVID-19 treatments approved in the European Union and clinical recommendations for the management of non-hospitalized and hospitalized patients. Ann Med 2022; 54:2856-2860. [PMID: 36259490 PMCID: PMC9586661 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2133162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 continues to have a serious impact on public health worldwide. Most patients develop mild to moderate symptoms and recover without requiring special treatment, but up to 15% develop severe (dyspnea, hypoxia, lung involvement) or critical symptoms (respiratory failure, septic shock, thromboembolism, multiorgan dysfunction). Although vaccination is having a substantial impact on case numbers, hospitalizations and deaths, there remains a need for new effective treatments against COVID-19. METHODS This short review aims at reporting on current therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2 focussing on new drugs authorized in the European Union, describing the treatment strategies and the clinical recommendations for the management of hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients based on the available guidelines for clinical practice. RESULTS New effective drugs, like antiviral medications and monoclonal antibodies, have been developed as therapy against severe and life-threatening disease courses. Specifically, the European Medicines Agency has authorized two antiviral medicines (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir), supporting also early use of molnupiravir before marketing authorization, and four monoclonal antibodies (regdanvimab, casirivimab/imdevimab, sotrovimab, tixagevimab/cilgavimab). In addition, three drugs (anakinra, tocilizumab, baricitinib) previously authorized for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis are also available to treat COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations and guidelines for clinical practice should be regularly updated as further evidence becomes available in favour or against specific interventions, to inform all stakeholders involved in the health care of COVID-19 patients both in the community and in the hospital setting, aiming at improving the quality of care and therefore the patient outcome.KEY MESSAGESCOVID-19 has been recognized as a multisystem disorder affecting many body systems; this wide spectrum of clinical patterns made difficult an appropriate choice of treatments able to counteract severe symptoms of the disease and alleviate the burden on the healthcare system.New effective drugs, like antiviral medications and monoclonal antibodies, have been developed and approved by the European Medicines Agency as therapy against severe and life-threatening disease courses.Recommendations and guidelines should be regularly updated as further evidence becomes available in favour or against specific interventions aiming at improving the quality of care and therefore the patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Bellino
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Investigation of hs-TnI and sST-2 as Potential Predictors of Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Survived Hospitalization for COVID-19 Pneumonia. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10112889. [PMID: 36359409 PMCID: PMC9687975 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: COVID-19 survivors reveal an increased long-term risk for cardiovascular disease. Biomarkers like troponins and sST-2 improve stratification of cardiovascular risk. Nevertheless, their prognostic value for identifying long-term cardiovascular risk after having survived COVID-19 has yet to be evaluated. Methods: In this single-center study, admission serum biomarkers of sST-2 and hs-TnI in a single cohort of 251 hospitalized COVID-19 survivors were evaluated. Concentrations were correlated with major cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death and/or need for cardiovascular hospitalization during follow-up after hospital discharge [FU: 415 days (403; 422)]. Results: MACE was a frequent finding during FU with an incidence of 8.4% (cardiovascular death: 2.8% and/or need for cardiovascular hospitalization: 7.2%). Both biomarkers were reliable indicators of MACE (hs-TnI: sensitivity = 66.7% & specificity = 65.7%; sST-2: sensitivity = 33.3% & specificity = 97.4%). This was confirmed in a multivariate proportional-hazards analysis: besides age (HR = 1.047, 95% CI = 1.012−1.084, p = 0.009), hs-TnI (HR = 4.940, 95% CI = 1.904−12.816, p = 0.001) and sST-2 (HR = 10.901, 95% CI = 4.509−29.271, p < 0.001) were strong predictors of MACE. The predictive value of the model was further improved by combining both biomarkers with the factor age (concordance index hs-TnI + sST2 + age = 0.812). Conclusion: During long-term FU, hospitalized COVID-19 survivors, hs-TnI and sST-2 at admission, were strong predictors of MACE, indicating both proteins to be involved in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.
Collapse
|
40
|
Salton F, Confalonieri P, Centanni S, Mondoni M, Petrosillo N, Bonfanti P, Lapadula G, Lacedonia D, Voza A, Carpenè N, Montico M, Reccardini N, Meduri GU, Ruaro B, Confalonieri M. Prolonged higher dose methylprednisolone vs. conventional dexamethasone in COVID-19 pneumonia: a randomised controlled trial (MEDEAS). Eur Respir J 2022; 61:13993003.01514-2022. [PMID: 36356972 PMCID: PMC9650195 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01514-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
IntroductionDysregulated systemic inflammation is the primary driver of mortality in severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Current guidelines favor a 7–10-day course of any glucocorticoid equivalent to dexamethasone 6 mg·day−1. A comparative RCT with a higher dose and a longer duration of intervention was lacking.MethodsWe conducted a multi-center, open-label RCT to investigate methylprednisolone 80 mg as a continuous daily infusion for 8 days followed by slow taperingversusdexamethasone 6 mg daily for up to 10 days in adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring oxygen or noninvasive respiratory support. Primary outcome: reduction in 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes: mechanical ventilation-free days at 28 days, need for ICU referral, length of hospitalisation, need for tracheostomy, changes in PaO2:FiO2 ratio, C-reactive protein levels and WHO clinical progression scale at days 3, 7, and 14.Results677 randomised patients were included. Findings are reported as methylprednisolone (n=337)versusdexamethasone (n=340). By day 28, there were no significant differences in mortality (35[10.4%]versus41[12.1%]; p=0.49), nor in the median mechanical ventilation-free days (23[14]versus24[16]; p=0.49). ICU referral was necessary in 41[12.2%]versus45[13.2%]; p=0.68 and tracheostomy in 8[2.4%]versus9[2.6%]; p=0.82. Survivors in the methylprednisolone group required a longer median hospitalisation (15[11]versus14[11] days; p=0.005) and experienced an improvement in C-reactive protein levels, but not in PaO2:FiO2ratio, at days 7 and 14. There were no differences in disease progression at the prespecified timepoints.ConclusionProlonged, higher dose methylprednisolone did not reduce mortality at 28 days compared to conventional dexamethasone in COVID-19 pneumonia.
Collapse
|
41
|
Pielenz C, Schneider M, Salveridou-Hof E, Flick M, Gaigl G, Khorikian-Ghazari N, Güler D, Halms T, Kapfhammer A, Lorenz C, Röh A, Wagner E, Falkai P, Leucht S, Gaebel W, Hasan A. From conventional to living guidelines - faster updates for better informed guidance? A scoping review. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 174:20-31. [PMID: 36041983 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of living guidelines is keeping recommendations in guidelines up-to-date as new evidence becomes available. This review aims at scoping the prevalence and formal characteristics of living guidelines in the field of medicine and explore differences between formats. METHODS A selective search of living guidelines in MEDLINE via PubMed, Google Scholar and six relevant online repositories for guidelines (MAGICApp, AWMF, GIN, NICE, WHO-Iris, BIGG) was conducted. Authors and editors were contacted to receive previous non-living guideline versions. Living guidelines were subsequently analyzed according to pre-defined methodological criteria as described below (inter-comparison). Differences between living and their conventional (non-living) versions were assessed (intra-comparison). RESULTS 83 living guidelines were identified and selected for further screening, out of which 26 were eligible for analysis. 61.5% were new publications (de-novo guidelines) and 38.5% updates of pre-existing guidelines. There are some concepts defining, for example, the update cycle (AWMF, maximum of 12 months) but not all living guidelines follow or refer to existing concepts. The analysis shows that living guidelines in line with the established standards for (non-living) clinical guidelines involve an evidence standard, an extensive consensus process (often in the form of a Delphi process), and the inclusion of stakeholders (patients/relatives) in the development process, despite the high frequency of updates. When comparing living and conventional guidelines with the descriptive approach changes were found in update frequency (being more frequent with living guidelines, annually at the latest) and publication format (towards more digital) and public consultation (living guidelines offered more possibilities), no substantial methodological differences were observed in the description of consensus processes, changes in number of recommendations, inclusion of patient representatives. Given the small number of comparable pairs, the results reflect a tendency in the analyzed sample. CONCLUSIONS The definition and development of living guidelines varied. Standardization (i. e. in the form of a checklist, procedure template) is needed to assess quality of the living process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charline Pielenz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; WHO Collaborating Centre in Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health DEU-131
| | - Marco Schneider
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| | - Eva Salveridou-Hof
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; WHO Collaborating Centre in Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health DEU-131
| | - Marisa Flick
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; WHO Collaborating Centre in Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health DEU-131
| | - Gabriele Gaigl
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Naiiri Khorikian-Ghazari
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Duygu Güler
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Theresa Halms
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Angelika Kapfhammer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Lorenz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Röh
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Elias Wagner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Leucht
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Gaebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; WHO Collaborating Centre in Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health DEU-131
| | - Alkomiet Hasan
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Snouber A, Metahri M, Chahraoui S, Benatta D, Boukhari S, Hadjouj A, Larbi D, Rahmani M, Douichine M, Zouaoui A, Djaid M, Ben Saad H. Clinical and computed tomography features of patients suspected of COVID-19 in the university hospital of Oran, Algeria. LA TUNISIE MEDICALE 2022; 100:374-383. [PMID: 36206086 PMCID: PMC9552237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The analysis of the clinical and radiological characteristics of COVID-19 patients around the world observed a rich semiology, different from one country to another, and within the same country. AIM To analyze the clinical, computed tomography (CT) features, and the outcome of patients suspected of COVID-19 hospitalized in a COVID-19 unit of Oran university hospital (Algeria). METHODS We collected retrospectively the files of patients suspected of COVID-19 admitted in a COVID-19 unit during July 2020. Data were collected on standardized questionnaire with prior coding of parameters. Patients were admitted according to a triage based on their clinical situation and the chest CT aspects suggestive of COVID-19. Two physicians reviewed the high-resolution CT (HR-CT) images independently, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus with the input of two others experimented physicians. RESULTS 112 patients (64% males, median age: 68 (18-88) years) were included. The main symptoms were dyspnea (51.7%), cough (34%), fatigue (14%). Almost the half (49.1%) of patients had hypoxemia. The HR-CT findings were typical of COVID-19 in 96% of patients. Although 61% of patients had favorable prognosis, mortality rate was 30%. Mutlivariate analysis of risk factors for death showed that patients aged > 60 years had a 4-fold risk of death (95% confidence interval: [1.27-12.58], p=0.018). CONCLUSION Dyspnea, cough and fatigue were predominant symptoms, moderate and severe COVID-19 characterized our patients. Age > 60 years was a major risk factor for the deaths of our patients.
Collapse
|
43
|
Kushner P, McCarberg BH, Grange L, Kolosov A, Haveric AL, Zucal V, Petruschke R, Bissonnette S. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in COVID-19. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2022; 32:35. [PMID: 36127354 PMCID: PMC9489480 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-022-00300-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, anecdotal reports emerged suggesting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may increase susceptibility to infection and adversely impact clinical outcomes. This narrative literature review (March 2020–July 2021) attempted to clarify the relationship between NSAID use and COVID-19 outcomes related to disease susceptibility or severity. Twenty-four relevant publications (covering 25 studies) reporting original research data were identified; all were observational cohort studies, and eight were described as retrospective. Overall, these studies are consistent in showing that NSAIDs neither increase the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection nor worsen outcomes in patients with COVID-19. This is reflected in current recommendations from major public health authorities across the world, which support NSAID use for analgesic or antipyretic treatment during COVID-19. Thus, there is no basis on which to restrict or prohibit use of these drugs by consumers or patients to manage their health conditions and symptoms during the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Kushner
- Kushner Wellness Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
| | - Bill H McCarberg
- Department of Family Medicine, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Laurent Grange
- Rheumatology Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Echirolles, France.,President of the French League Against Rheumatism (AFLAR), Paris, France
| | - Anton Kolosov
- Medical Affairs, GSK Consumer Healthcare, Rochester Park, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Vincent Zucal
- Consumer Safety, GSK Consumer Healthcare, Warren, NJ, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Zhong H, Zhou Y, Mei SY, Tang R, Feng JH, He ZY, Xu QY, Xing SP. Scars of COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis of post-COVID-19 fibrosis. Front Public Health 2022; 10:967829. [PMID: 36203683 PMCID: PMC9530282 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.967829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) becomes a worldwide public health threat. Increasing evidence proves that COVID-19-induced acute injuries could be reversed by a couple of therapies. After that, post-COVID-19 fibrosis (PCF), a sequela of "Long COVID," earns rapidly emerging concerns. PCF is associated with deteriorative lung function and worse quality of life. But the process of PCF remains speculative. Therefore, we aim to conduct a bibliometric analysis to explore the overall structure, hotspots, and trend topics of PCF. Materials and methods A comprehensive search was performed in the Web of Science core database to collect literature on PCF. Search syntax included COVID-19 relevant terms: "COVID 19," "COVID-19 Virus Disease," "COVID-19 Virus Infection," "Coronavirus Disease-19," "2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease," "2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection," "SARS Coronavirus 2 Infection," "COVID-19 Pandemic," "Coronavirus," "2019-nCoV," and "SARS-CoV-2"; and fibrosis relevant terms: "Fibrosis," "Fibroses," and "Cirrhosis." Articles in English were included. Totally 1,088 publications were enrolled. Searching results were subsequentially exported and collected for the bibliometric analysis. National, organizational, and individual level data were analyzed and visualized through biblioshiny package in the R, VOSviewer software, the CiteSpace software, and the Graphical Clustering Toolkit (gCLUTO) software, respectively. Results The intrinsic structure and development in the field of PCF were investigated in the present bibliometric analysis. The topmost keywords were "COVID-19" (occurrences, 636) surrounded by "SARS-CoV-2" (occurrences, 242), "coronavirus" (occurrences, 123), "fibrosis" (occurrences, 120), and "pneumonia" (occurrences, 94). The epidemiology, physiopathology, diagnosis, and therapy of PCF were extensively studied. After this, based on dynamic analysis of keywords, hot topics sharply changed from "Wuhan," "inflammation," and "cytokine storm" to "quality of life" and "infection" through burst detection; from "acute respiratory syndrome," "cystic-fibrosis" and "fibrosis" to "infection," "COVID-19," "quality-of-life" through thematic evolution; from "enzyme" to "post COVID." Similarly, co-cited references analysis showed that topics of references with most citations shift from "pulmonary pathology" (cluster 0) to "COVID-19 vaccination" (cluster 6). Additionally, the overview of contributors, impact, and collaboration was revealed. Summarily, the USA stood out as the most prolific, influential, and collaborative country. The Udice French Research University, Imperial College London, Harvard University, and the University of Washington represented the largest volume of publications, citations, H-index, and co-authorships, respectively. Dana Albon was the most productive and cited author with the strongest co-authorship link strength. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis topped the list of prolific and influential journals. Conclusion Outcomes gained from this study assisted professionals in better realizing PCF and would guide future practices. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutics were study hotspots in the early phase of PCF research. As the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and progress in this field, recent attention shifted to the quality of life of patients and post-COVID comorbidities. Nevertheless, COVID-19 relevant infection and vaccination were speculated to be research trends with current and future interest. International cooperation as well as in-depth laboratory experiments were encouraged to promote further explorations in the field of PCF.
Collapse
|
45
|
Cuker A, Tseng EK, Nieuwlaat R, Angchaisuksiri P, Blair C, Dane K, DeSancho MT, Diuguid D, Griffin DO, Kahn SR, Klok FA, Lee AI, Neumann I, Pai A, Righini M, Sanfilippo KM, Siegal DM, Skara M, Terrell DR, Touri K, Akl EA, Al Jabiri R, Al Jabiri Y, Barbara AM, Bognanni A, Boulos M, Brignardello-Petersen R, Charide R, Colunga-Lozano LE, Dearness K, Darzi AJ, Hussein H, Karam SG, Mansour R, Morgano GP, Morsi RZ, Muti-Schünemann G, Nadim MK, Philip BA, Qiu Y, Benitez YR, Stevens A, Solo K, Wiercioch W, Mustafa RA, Schünemann HJ. American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19: January 2022 update on the use of therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation in acutely ill patients. Blood Adv 2022; 6:4915-4923. [PMID: 35503027 PMCID: PMC9068240 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19-related acute illness is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVE These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in making decisions about the use of anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19. METHODS ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included patient representatives and applied strategies to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process and performed systematic evidence reviews (through November 2021). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. This is an update to guidelines published in February 2021 as part of the living phase of these guidelines. RESULTS The panel made one additional recommendation. The panel issued a conditional recommendation in favor of therapeutic-intensity over prophylactic-intensity anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19-related acute illness who do not have suspected or confirmed VTE. The panel emphasized the need for an individualized assessment of risk of thrombosis and bleeding. The panel also noted that heparin (unfractionated or low molecular weight) may be preferred because of a preponderance of evidence with this class of anticoagulants. CONCLUSION This conditional recommendation was based on very low certainty in the evidence, underscoring the need for additional, high-quality, randomized controlled trials comparing different intensities of anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19-related acute illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Cuker
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eric K. Tseng
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robby Nieuwlaat
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Pantep Angchaisuksiri
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Kathryn Dane
- Department of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Maria T. DeSancho
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Daniel O. Griffin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Physicians & Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY
- Research and Development at United Health Group, Minnetonka, MN
- Prohealth NY, Lake Success, NY
| | - Susan R. Kahn
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Frederikus A. Klok
- Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alfred Ian Lee
- Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Ignacio Neumann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ashok Pai
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland/Richmond, CA
| | - Marc Righini
- Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Deborah M. Siegal
- Department of Medicine and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Deirdra R. Terrell
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | | - Elie A. Akl
- Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | | | - Angela M. Barbara
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Antonio Bognanni
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mary Boulos
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Romina Brignardello-Petersen
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Rana Charide
- Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Luis E. Colunga-Lozano
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health Science Center, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Karin Dearness
- Library Services, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea J. Darzi
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Heba Hussein
- Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Samer G. Karam
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Razan Mansour
- Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Gian Paolo Morgano
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Rami Z. Morsi
- Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Giovanna Muti-Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Menatalla K. Nadim
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Binu A. Philip
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yuan Qiu
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yetiani Roldan Benitez
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Adrienne Stevens
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Karla Solo
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Wojtek Wiercioch
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Reem A. Mustafa
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Holger J. Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Institut für Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Reyes LF, Murthy S, Garcia-Gallo E, Merson L, Ibáñez-Prada ED, Rello J, Fuentes YV, Martin-Loeches I, Bozza F, Duque S, Taccone FS, Fowler RA, Kartsonaki C, Gonçalves BP, Citarella BW, Aryal D, Burhan E, Cummings MJ, Delmas C, Diaz R, Figueiredo-Mello C, Hashmi M, Panda PK, Jiménez MP, Rincon DFB, Thomson D, Nichol A, Marshall JC, Olliaro PL. Respiratory support in patients with severe COVID-19 in the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection (ISARIC) COVID-19 study: a prospective, multinational, observational study. Crit Care 2022; 26:276. [PMID: 36100904 PMCID: PMC9469080 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04155-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 30% of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 require advanced respiratory support, including high-flow nasal cannulas (HFNC), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV), or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors for failing non-invasive respiratory support in patients treated with severe COVID-19 during the first two years of the pandemic in high-income countries (HICs) and low middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS This is a multinational, multicentre, prospective cohort study embedded in the ISARIC-WHO COVID-19 Clinical Characterisation Protocol. Patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who required hospital admission were recruited prospectively. Patients treated with HFNC, NIV, or IMV within the first 24 h of hospital admission were included in this study. Descriptive statistics, random forest, and logistic regression analyses were used to describe clinical characteristics and compare clinical outcomes among patients treated with the different types of advanced respiratory support. RESULTS A total of 66,565 patients were included in this study. Overall, 82.6% of patients were treated in HIC, and 40.6% were admitted to the hospital during the first pandemic wave. During the first 24 h after hospital admission, patients in HICs were more frequently treated with HFNC (48.0%), followed by NIV (38.6%) and IMV (13.4%). In contrast, patients admitted in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were less frequently treated with HFNC (16.1%) and the majority received IMV (59.1%). The failure rate of non-invasive respiratory support (i.e. HFNC or NIV) was 15.5%, of which 71.2% were from HIC and 28.8% from LMIC. The variables most strongly associated with non-invasive ventilation failure, defined as progression to IMV, were high leukocyte counts at hospital admission (OR [95%CI]; 5.86 [4.83-7.10]), treatment in an LMIC (OR [95%CI]; 2.04 [1.97-2.11]), and tachypnoea at hospital admission (OR [95%CI]; 1.16 [1.14-1.18]). Patients who failed HFNC/NIV had a higher 28-day fatality ratio (OR [95%CI]; 1.27 [1.25-1.30]). CONCLUSIONS In the present international cohort, the most frequently used advanced respiratory support was the HFNC. However, IMV was used more often in LMIC. Higher leucocyte count, tachypnoea, and treatment in LMIC were risk factors for HFNC/NIV failure. HFNC/NIV failure was related to worse clinical outcomes, such as 28-day mortality. Trial registration This is a prospective observational study; therefore, no health care interventions were applied to participants, and trial registration is not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Felipe Reyes
- Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Infectious Diseases Department, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
- Critical Care Department, Clínica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
| | - Srinivas Murthy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Laura Merson
- Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elsa D Ibáñez-Prada
- Infectious Diseases Department, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
- Critical Care Department, Clínica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | - Jordi Rello
- Clinical Research/Epidemiology in Pneumonia & Sepsis (CRIPS), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yuli V Fuentes
- Infectious Diseases Department, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
- Critical Care Department, Clínica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | - Ignacio Martin-Loeches
- Department of Clinical Medicine, St James's Hospital, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fernando Bozza
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Sara Duque
- Infectious Diseases Department, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | - Fabio S Taccone
- Department of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratoire de Recherche Experimentale, Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Robert A Fowler
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Erlina Burhan
- Infection Division, Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
| | - Matthew J Cummings
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Rodrigo Diaz
- Intensive Care Unit, Clinica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Madiha Hashmi
- Critical Care Asia and Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | | | | - David Thomson
- Division of Critical Care, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alistair Nichol
- University College Dublin Clinical Research Centre at St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John C Marshall
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Piero L Olliaro
- Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cuker A, Tseng EK, Schünemann HJ, Angchaisuksiri P, Blair C, Dane K, DeSancho MT, Diuguid D, Griffin DO, Kahn SR, Klok FA, Lee AI, Neumann I, Pai A, Righini M, Sanfilippo KM, Siegal DM, Skara M, Terrell DR, Touri K, Akl EA, Al Jabiri R, Al Jabiri Y, Boulos M, Brignardello-Petersen R, Charide R, Colunga-Lozano LE, Dearness K, Darzi AJ, Karam SG, Morgano GP, Morsi RZ, Philip BA, Benitez YR, Stevens A, Solo K, Wiercioch W, Mustafa RA, Nieuwlaat R. American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis for patients with COVID-19: March 2022 update on the use of anticoagulation in critically ill patients. Blood Adv 2022; 6:4975-4982. [PMID: 35748885 PMCID: PMC9236618 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19-related critical illness is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVE These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in decisions about the use of anticoagulation for patients with COVID-19. METHODS ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel, including 3 patient representatives, and applied strategies to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Centre supported the guideline development process, including performing systematic evidence reviews (up to January 2022). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the GRADE approach to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. This is an update to guidelines published in February 2021 and May 2021 as part of the living phase of these guidelines. RESULTS The panel made 1 additional recommendation: a conditional recommendation for the use of prophylactic-intensity over therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation for patients with COVID-19-related critical illness who do not have suspected or confirmed VTE. The panel emphasized the need for an individualized assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risk. CONCLUSIONS This conditional recommendation was based on very low certainty in the evidence, underscoring the need for additional, high-quality, randomized controlled trials comparing different intensities of anticoagulation for patients with COVID-19-related critical illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Cuker
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eric K. Tseng
- Division of Hematology/Oncology; St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Holger J. Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Institut für Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Pantep Angchaisuksiri
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Kathryn Dane
- Department of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Maria T. DeSancho
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Daniel O. Griffin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Physicians & Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY
- Research and Development at United Health Group, Minnetonka, MN
- Prohealth NY, Lake Success, NY
| | - Susan R. Kahn
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Frederikus A. Klok
- Department of Medicine–Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alfred Ian Lee
- Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Ignacio Neumann
- Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastian, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ashok Pai
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland/Richmond, CA
| | - Marc Righini
- Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Deborah M. Siegal
- Department of Medicine and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Deirdra R. Terrell
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | | - Elie A. Akl
- Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | | | - Mary Boulos
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Romina Brignardello-Petersen
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Rana Charide
- Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Luis E. Colunga-Lozano
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health Science Center, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Karin Dearness
- Library Services, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea J. Darzi
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Samer G. Karam
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gian Paolo Morgano
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Rami Z. Morsi
- Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; and
| | - Binu A. Philip
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yetiani Roldan Benitez
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Adrienne Stevens
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Karla Solo
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Wojtek Wiercioch
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Reem A. Mustafa
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Robby Nieuwlaat
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pletz MW, Jensen AV, Bahrs C, Davenport C, Rupp J, Witzenrath M, Barten-Neiner G, Kolditz M, Dettmer S, Chalmers JD, Stolz D, Suttorp N, Aliberti S, Kuebler WM, Rohde G. Unmet needs in pneumonia research: a comprehensive approach by the CAPNETZ study group. Respir Res 2022; 23:239. [PMID: 36088316 PMCID: PMC9463667 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-022-02117-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Despite improvements in medical science and public health, mortality of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has barely changed throughout the last 15 years. The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has once again highlighted the central importance of acute respiratory infections to human health. The “network of excellence on Community Acquired Pneumonia” (CAPNETZ) hosts the most comprehensive CAP database worldwide including more than 12,000 patients. CAPNETZ connects physicians, microbiologists, virologists, epidemiologists, and computer scientists throughout Europe. Our aim was to summarize the current situation in CAP research and identify the most pressing unmet needs in CAP research.
Methods
To identify areas of future CAP research, CAPNETZ followed a multiple-step procedure. First, research members of CAPNETZ were individually asked to identify unmet needs. Second, the top 100 experts in the field of CAP research were asked for their insights about the unmet needs in CAP (Delphi approach). Third, internal and external experts discussed unmet needs in CAP at a scientific retreat.
Results
Eleven topics for future CAP research were identified: detection of causative pathogens, next generation sequencing for antimicrobial treatment guidance, imaging diagnostics, biomarkers, risk stratification, antiviral and antibiotic treatment, adjunctive therapy, vaccines and prevention, systemic and local immune response, comorbidities, and long-term cardio-vascular complications.
Conclusion
Pneumonia is a complex disease where the interplay between pathogens, immune system and comorbidities not only impose an immediate risk of mortality but also affect the patients’ risk of developing comorbidities as well as mortality for up to a decade after pneumonia has resolved. Our review of unmet needs in CAP research has shown that there are still major shortcomings in our knowledge of CAP.
Collapse
|
49
|
Battaglini D, Cruz F, Robba C, Pelosi P, Rocco PRM. Failed clinical trials on COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome in hospitalized patients: common oversights and streamlining the development of clinically effective therapeutics. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2022; 31:995-1015. [PMID: 36047644 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2022.2120801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put a strain on global healthcare systems. Despite admirable efforts to develop rapidly new pharmacotherapies, supportive treatments remain the standard of care. Multiple clinical trials have failed due to design issues, biased patient enrollment, small sample sizes, inadequate control groups, and lack of long-term outcomes monitoring. AREAS COVERED This narrative review depicts the current situation around failed and success COVID-19 clinical trials and recommendations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, oversights and streamlining of clinically effective therapeutics. PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, and WHO and NIH guidelines were searched for relevant literature up to 5 August 2022. EXPERT OPINION The WHO, NIH, and IDSA have issued recommendations to better clarify which drugs should be used during the different phases of the disease. Given the biases and high heterogeneity of published studies, interpretation of the current literature is difficult. Future clinical trials should be designed to standardize clinical approaches, with appropriate organization, patient selection, addition of control groups, and careful identification of disease phase to reduce heterogeneity and bias and should rely on the integration of scientific societies to promote a consensus on interpretation of the data and recommendations for optimal COVID-19 therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Battaglini
- Dipartimento di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS per l'Oncologia e le Neuroscienze, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fernanda Cruz
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Chiara Robba
- Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS per l'Oncologia e Neuroscienze, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Dipartimento di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS per l'Oncologia e le Neuroscienze, Genoa, Italy.,Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS per l'Oncologia e Neuroscienze, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Patricia R M Rocco
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,COVID-19 Virus Network from Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation, Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development, and Foundation Carlos Chagas Filho Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Managing two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in northern emergency departments in Paris: COVIDORG II. JOURNAL EUROPÉEN DES URGENCES ET DE RÉANIMATION 2022. [PMCID: PMC9433346 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurea.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Context Objective Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
|