101
|
Zajicek P, Welti EAR, Baker NJ, Januschke K, Brauner O, Haase P. Long-term data reveal unimodal responses of ground beetle abundance to precipitation and land use but no changes in taxonomic and functional diversity. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17468. [PMID: 34471149 PMCID: PMC8410911 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96910-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
While much of global biodiversity is undoubtedly under threat, the responses of ecological communities to changing climate, land use intensification, and long-term changes in both taxonomic and functional diversity over time, has still not been fully explored for many taxonomic groups, especially invertebrates. We compiled time series of ground beetles covering the past two decades from 40 sites located in five regions across Germany. We calculated site-based trends for 21 community metrics representing taxonomic and functional diversity of ground beetles, activity density (a proxy for abundance), and activity densities of functional groups. We assessed both overall and regional temporal trends and the influence of the global change drivers of temperature, precipitation, and land use on ground beetle communities. While we did not detect overall temporal changes in ground beetle taxonomic and functional diversity, taxonomic turnover changed within two regions, illustrating that community change at the local scale does not always correspond to patterns at broader spatial scales. Additionally, ground beetle activity density had a unimodal response to both annual precipitation and land use. Limited temporal change in ground beetle communities may indicate a shifting baseline, where community degradation was reached prior to the start of our observation in 1999. In addition, nonlinear responses of animal communities to environmental change present a challenge when quantifying temporal trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petr Zajicek
- Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany.
| | - Ellen A R Welti
- Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany
| | - Nathan J Baker
- Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany
| | - Kathrin Januschke
- Department of Aquatic Ecology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Oliver Brauner
- Office for Zoology, Vegetation and Conservation (Büro für Zoologie, Vegetation und Naturschutz), Eberswalde, Germany
| | - Peter Haase
- Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany
- Faculty of Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Global and national trends, gaps, and opportunities in documenting and monitoring species distributions. PLoS Biol 2021; 19:e3001336. [PMID: 34383738 PMCID: PMC8360587 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Conserving and managing biodiversity in the face of ongoing global change requires sufficient evidence to assess status and trends of species distributions. Here, we propose novel indicators of biodiversity data coverage and sampling effectiveness and analyze national trajectories in closing spatiotemporal knowledge gaps for terrestrial vertebrates (1950 to 2019). Despite a rapid rise in data coverage, particularly in the last 2 decades, strong geographic and taxonomic biases persist. For some taxa and regions, a tremendous growth in records failed to directly translate into newfound knowledge due to a sharp decline in sampling effectiveness. However, we found that a nation’s coverage was stronger for species for which it holds greater stewardship. As countries under the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework renew their commitments to an improved, rigorous biodiversity knowledge base, our findings highlight opportunities for international collaboration to close critical information gaps. Conserving and managing biodiversity in the face of ongoing global change requires sufficient evidence to assess status and trends of species distributions. This study analyzes national trajectories in closing spatiotemporal knowledge gaps for terrestrial vertebrates (1950-2019) based on novel indicators of data coverage and sampling effectiveness.
Collapse
|
103
|
Bjorkman AD, Wulff A. A reflection on four impactful Ambio papers: The biotic perspective : This article belongs to Ambio's 50th Anniversary Collection. Theme: Climate change impacts. AMBIO 2021; 50:1145-1149. [PMID: 33650069 PMCID: PMC8068746 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01442-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Climate change represents one of the most pressing societal and scientific challenges of our time. While much of the current research on climate change focuses on future prediction, some of the strongest signals of warming can already be seen in Arctic and alpine areas, where temperatures are rising faster than the global average, and in the oceans, where the combination of rising temperatures and acidification due to increased CO2 concentrations has had catastrophic consequences for sensitive marine organisms inhabiting coral reefs. The scientific papers highlighted as part of this anniversary issue represent some of the most impactful advances in our understanding of the consequences of anthropogenic climate change. Here, we reflect on the legacy of these papers from the biotic perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne D. Bjorkman
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Carl Skottsbergs gata 22B, 413 19 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Carl Skottsbergs gata 22B, 413 19 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Angela Wulff
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Carl Skottsbergs gata 22B, 413 19 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Arlé E, Zizka A, Keil P, Winter M, Essl F, Knight T, Weigelt P, Jiménez‐Muñoz M, Meyer C. bRacatus
: A method to estimate the accuracy and biogeographical status of georeferenced biological data. Methods Ecol Evol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Arlé
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, Pharmacy and Psychology University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany
| | - Alexander Zizka
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Petr Keil
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Institute of Computer Science Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha Czech Republic
| | - Marten Winter
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
| | - Franz Essl
- Division of Conservation, Vegetation and Landscape Ecology Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research University Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Tiffany Knight
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Institute of Biology Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany
- Department of Community Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research ‐ UFZ Halle (Saale) Germany
| | - Patrick Weigelt
- Biodiversity, Macroecology & Biogeography University of Goettingen Göttingen Germany
| | - Marina Jiménez‐Muñoz
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
| | - Carsten Meyer
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, Pharmacy and Psychology University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Institute of Geosciences and Geography Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle Germany
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Mottl O, Flantua SGA, Bhatta KP, Felde VA, Giesecke T, Goring S, Grimm EC, Haberle S, Hooghiemstra H, Ivory S, Kuneš P, Wolters S, Seddon AWR, Williams JW. Global acceleration in rates of vegetation change over the past 18,000 years. Science 2021; 372:860-864. [PMID: 34016781 DOI: 10.1126/science.abg1685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Global vegetation over the past 18,000 years has been transformed first by the climate changes that accompanied the last deglaciation and again by increasing human pressures; however, the magnitude and patterns of rates of vegetation change are poorly understood globally. Using a compilation of 1181 fossil pollen sequences and newly developed statistical methods, we detect a worldwide acceleration in the rates of vegetation compositional change beginning between 4.6 and 2.9 thousand years ago that is globally unprecedented over the past 18,000 years in both magnitude and extent. Late Holocene rates of change equal or exceed the deglacial rates for all continents, which suggests that the scale of human effects on terrestrial ecosystems exceeds even the climate-driven transformations of the last deglaciation. The acceleration of biodiversity change demonstrated in ecological datasets from the past century began millennia ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondřej Mottl
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
| | - Suzette G A Flantua
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway. .,Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
| | - Kuber P Bhatta
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
| | - Vivian A Felde
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.,Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
| | - Thomas Giesecke
- Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, 3508 TC, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Simon Goring
- Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,Center for Climatic Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Eric C Grimm
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Simon Haberle
- Department of Archaeology and Natural History, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.,Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
| | - Henry Hooghiemstra
- Department of Ecosystem and Landscape Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sarah Ivory
- Department of Geosciences and the Earth and Environmental Systems Institute (EESI), Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Petr Kuneš
- Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Steffen Wolters
- Lower Saxony Institute for Historical Coastal Research, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| | - Alistair W R Seddon
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.,Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
| | - John W Williams
- Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,Center for Climatic Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Phillips HRP, Bach EM, Bartz MLC, Bennett JM, Beugnon R, Briones MJI, Brown GG, Ferlian O, Gongalsky KB, Guerra CA, König-Ries B, Krebs JJ, Orgiazzi A, Ramirez KS, Russell DJ, Schwarz B, Wall DH, Brose U, Decaëns T, Lavelle P, Loreau M, Mathieu J, Mulder C, van der Putten WH, Rillig MC, Thakur MP, de Vries FT, Wardle DA, Ammer C, Ammer S, Arai M, Ayuke FO, Baker GH, Baretta D, Barkusky D, Beauséjour R, Bedano JC, Birkhofer K, Blanchart E, Blossey B, Bolger T, Bradley RL, Brossard M, Burtis JC, Capowiez Y, Cavagnaro TR, Choi A, Clause J, Cluzeau D, Coors A, Crotty FV, Crumsey JM, Dávalos A, Cosín DJD, Dobson AM, Domínguez A, Duhour AE, van Eekeren N, Emmerling C, Falco LB, Fernández R, Fonte SJ, Fragoso C, Franco ALC, Fusilero A, Geraskina AP, Gholami S, González G, Gundale MJ, López MG, Hackenberger BK, Hackenberger DK, Hernández LM, Hirth JR, Hishi T, Holdsworth AR, Holmstrup M, Hopfensperger KN, Lwanga EH, Huhta V, Hurisso TT, Iannone BV, Iordache M, Irmler U, Ivask M, Jesús JB, Johnson-Maynard JL, Joschko M, Kaneko N, Kanianska R, Keith AM, Kernecker ML, Koné AW, Kooch Y, Kukkonen ST, Lalthanzara H, Lammel DR, Lebedev IM, Le Cadre E, Lincoln NK, et alPhillips HRP, Bach EM, Bartz MLC, Bennett JM, Beugnon R, Briones MJI, Brown GG, Ferlian O, Gongalsky KB, Guerra CA, König-Ries B, Krebs JJ, Orgiazzi A, Ramirez KS, Russell DJ, Schwarz B, Wall DH, Brose U, Decaëns T, Lavelle P, Loreau M, Mathieu J, Mulder C, van der Putten WH, Rillig MC, Thakur MP, de Vries FT, Wardle DA, Ammer C, Ammer S, Arai M, Ayuke FO, Baker GH, Baretta D, Barkusky D, Beauséjour R, Bedano JC, Birkhofer K, Blanchart E, Blossey B, Bolger T, Bradley RL, Brossard M, Burtis JC, Capowiez Y, Cavagnaro TR, Choi A, Clause J, Cluzeau D, Coors A, Crotty FV, Crumsey JM, Dávalos A, Cosín DJD, Dobson AM, Domínguez A, Duhour AE, van Eekeren N, Emmerling C, Falco LB, Fernández R, Fonte SJ, Fragoso C, Franco ALC, Fusilero A, Geraskina AP, Gholami S, González G, Gundale MJ, López MG, Hackenberger BK, Hackenberger DK, Hernández LM, Hirth JR, Hishi T, Holdsworth AR, Holmstrup M, Hopfensperger KN, Lwanga EH, Huhta V, Hurisso TT, Iannone BV, Iordache M, Irmler U, Ivask M, Jesús JB, Johnson-Maynard JL, Joschko M, Kaneko N, Kanianska R, Keith AM, Kernecker ML, Koné AW, Kooch Y, Kukkonen ST, Lalthanzara H, Lammel DR, Lebedev IM, Le Cadre E, Lincoln NK, López-Hernández D, Loss SR, Marichal R, Matula R, Minamiya Y, Moos JH, Moreno G, Morón-Ríos A, Motohiro H, Muys B, Neirynck J, Norgrove L, Novo M, Nuutinen V, Nuzzo V, Mujeeb Rahman P, Pansu J, Paudel S, Pérès G, Pérez-Camacho L, Ponge JF, Prietzel J, Rapoport IB, Rashid MI, Rebollo S, Rodríguez MÁ, Roth AM, Rousseau GX, Rozen A, Sayad E, van Schaik L, Scharenbroch B, Schirrmann M, Schmidt O, Schröder B, Seeber J, Shashkov MP, Singh J, Smith SM, Steinwandter M, Szlavecz K, Talavera JA, Trigo D, Tsukamoto J, Uribe-López S, de Valença AW, Virto I, Wackett AA, Warren MW, Webster ER, Wehr NH, Whalen JK, Wironen MB, Wolters V, Wu P, Zenkova IV, Zhang W, Cameron EK, Eisenhauer N. Global data on earthworm abundance, biomass, diversity and corresponding environmental properties. Sci Data 2021; 8:136. [PMID: 34021166 PMCID: PMC8140120 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00912-z] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Earthworms are an important soil taxon as ecosystem engineers, providing a variety of crucial ecosystem functions and services. Little is known about their diversity and distribution at large spatial scales, despite the availability of considerable amounts of local-scale data. Earthworm diversity data, obtained from the primary literature or provided directly by authors, were collated with information on site locations, including coordinates, habitat cover, and soil properties. Datasets were required, at a minimum, to include abundance or biomass of earthworms at a site. Where possible, site-level species lists were included, as well as the abundance and biomass of individual species and ecological groups. This global dataset contains 10,840 sites, with 184 species, from 60 countries and all continents except Antarctica. The data were obtained from 182 published articles, published between 1973 and 2017, and 17 unpublished datasets. Amalgamating data into a single global database will assist researchers in investigating and answering a wide variety of pressing questions, for example, jointly assessing aboveground and belowground biodiversity distributions and drivers of biodiversity change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen R P Phillips
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
- Department of Environmental Science, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| | - Elizabeth M Bach
- Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative and School of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
- Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
| | - Marie L C Bartz
- Universidade Positivo, Rua Prof. Pedro Viriato Parigot de Souza, 5300, Curitiba, PR, 81280-330, Brazil
- Center of Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martins de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Joanne M Bennett
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1, 06108, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Centre for Applied Water Science, Institute for Applied Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - Rémy Beugnon
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maria J I Briones
- Departamento de Ecología y Biología Animal, Universidad de Vigo, 36310, Vigo, Spain
| | - George G Brown
- Embrapa Forestry, Estrada da Ribeira, km. 111, C.P. 231, Colombo, PR, 83411-000, Brazil
| | - Olga Ferlian
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Konstantin B Gongalsky
- A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky pr., 33, Moscow, 119071, Russia
- M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Carlos A Guerra
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1, 06108, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Birgitta König-Ries
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Ernst-Abbe-Platz 2, 07743, Jena, Germany
| | - Julia J Krebs
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Kelly S Ramirez
- Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), 6700, Wageningen, AB, The Netherlands
| | - David J Russell
- Senckenberg Museum for Natural History Görlitz, Department of Soil Zoology, 02826, Görlitz, Germany
| | - Benjamin Schwarz
- Biometry and Environmental System Analysis, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Diana H Wall
- Global Soil Biodiversity Initiative and School of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
- Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
| | - Ulrich Brose
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger-Str. 159, 07743, Jena, Germany
| | - Thibaud Decaëns
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France
| | - Patrick Lavelle
- Sorbonne Université, Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Michel Loreau
- Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, 09200, Moulis, France
| | - Jérôme Mathieu
- Sorbonne Université, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris (UMR 7618 IEES-Paris, CNRS, INRA, UPMC, IRD, UPEC), 4 place Jussieu, 75000, Paris, France
- INRA, IRD, Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris, F-75005, Paris, France
| | - Christian Mulder
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Via Androne 81, 95124, Catania, Italy
| | - Wim H van der Putten
- Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), 6700, Wageningen, AB, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University, PO Box 8123, 6700, Wageningen, ES, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias C Rillig
- Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195, Berlin, Germany
| | - Madhav P Thakur
- Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), 6700, Wageningen, AB, The Netherlands
| | - Franciska T de Vries
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David A Wardle
- Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore
| | - Christian Ammer
- Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Landuse, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, Göttingen, Germany
- Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Sabine Ammer
- Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Miwa Arai
- Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 3-1-3 Kan-nondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Fredrick O Ayuke
- Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology, University of Nairobi, Kapenguria Road, Off Naivasha Road, P.O Box 29053, Nairobi, Kenya
- Rwanda Institute for Conservation Agriculture, KG 541, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Geoff H Baker
- Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, PO Box 1700, Canberra, Australia
| | - Dilmar Baretta
- Department of Animal Science, Santa Catarina State University, Chapecó, SC, 89815-630, Brazil
| | - Dietmar Barkusky
- Experimental Infrastructure Platform (EIP), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Eberswalder Str. 84, Müncheberg, Germany
| | - Robin Beauséjour
- Départment de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Jose C Bedano
- Geology Department, FCEFQyN, ICBIA-CONICET (National Scientific and Technical Research Council), National University of Rio Cuarto, Ruta 36 Km, 601, Río Cuarto, Argentina
| | - Klaus Birkhofer
- Department of Ecology, Brandenburg University of Technology, Konrad-Wachsmann-Allee 6, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Eric Blanchart
- Eco&Sols, Univ Montpellier, IRD, INRAE, CIRAD, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
| | - Bernd Blossey
- Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Bolger
- Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Ireland
- School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Robert L Bradley
- Départment de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Michel Brossard
- Eco&Sols, Univ Montpellier, IRD, INRAE, CIRAD, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
| | - James C Burtis
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, 3132, Comstock Hall, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Yvan Capowiez
- EMMAH, UMR 1114, INRA, Site Agroparc, Avignon, France
| | - Timothy R Cavagnaro
- The School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The Waite Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, Australia
| | - Amy Choi
- Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Canada
| | - Julia Clause
- Laboratoire Écologie et Biologie des Interactions, équipe EES, UMR CNRS 7267, Université de Poitiers, 5 rue Albert Turpain, Poitiers, France
| | - Daniel Cluzeau
- UMR ECOBIO (Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Evolution) CNRS-Université de Rennes, Station Biologique, 35380, Paimpont, France
| | - Anja Coors
- ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Boettgerstr. 2-14, Floersheim, Germany
| | - Felicity V Crotty
- Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth Universtiy, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, SY24 3EE, United Kingdom
- School for Agriculture, Food and the Environment, Royal Agricultural University, Stroud Road, Cirencester, GL7 6JS, United Kingdom
| | - Jasmine M Crumsey
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E Green Street, Athens, USA
| | - Andrea Dávalos
- Department of Biological Sciencies, SUNY Cortland, 1215 Bowers Hall, Cortland, USA
| | - Darío J Díaz Cosín
- Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, University Complutense of Madrid, José Antonio Novais, 12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Annise M Dobson
- Yale School of the Environment, Yale University, 370 Prospect St, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anahí Domínguez
- Geology Department, FCEFQyN, ICBIA-CONICET (National Scientific and Technical Research Council), National University of Rio Cuarto, Ruta 36 Km, 601, Río Cuarto, Argentina
| | - Andrés Esteban Duhour
- Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Luján, Argentina - INEDES (Universidad Nacional de Luján - CONICET), Luján, Argentina
| | | | - Christoph Emmerling
- Department of Soil Science, University of Trier, Campus II, Behringstraße 21, Trier, Germany
| | - Liliana B Falco
- Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Instituto de Ecología y Desarrollo Sustentable, Universidad Nacional de Luján, Av. Constitución y Ruta 5, Luján, Argentina
| | - Rosa Fernández
- Animal Biodiversity and Evolution, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Steven J Fonte
- Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, 1170 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Carlos Fragoso
- Biodiversity and Systematic Network, Institute of Ecology A.C., El Haya, Xalapa, Veracruz, 91070, Mexico
| | - André L C Franco
- Department of Biology, Colorado State University, 200 West Lake Street, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Abegail Fusilero
- Department of Biological Sciences and Environmental Studies, University of the Philippines Mindanao, Tugbok District, Davao, Philippines
- Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic Ecology, Environmental Toxicology Unit - GhEnToxLab, Ghent University, Campus Coupure, Coupure Links 653, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anna P Geraskina
- Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity RAS, Profsoyuznaya st. 84/32 bldg. 14, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Grizelle González
- United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, 1201 Ceiba Street, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Michael J Gundale
- Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skogsmarksgrand 17, 901 83, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Mónica Gutiérrez López
- Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, University Complutense of Madrid, José Antonio Novais, 12, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Luis M Hernández
- Agriculture engineering, Agroecology Postgraduate Program, Maranhão State University, Avenida Lourenço Vieira da Silva 1000, São Luis, Brazil
| | - Jeff R Hirth
- Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions, Agriculture Victoria, Chiltern Valley Road, Rutherglen, Australia
| | - Takuo Hishi
- Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 394 Tsubakuro, Sasaguri, Fukuoka, 811-2415, Japan
| | | | - Martin Holmstrup
- Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Vejlsøvej 25, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kristine N Hopfensperger
- Department of Biological Science, Northern Kentucky University, 1 Nunn Drive, Highland Heights, KY, USA
| | - Esperanza Huerta Lwanga
- Agricultura Sociedad y Ambiente, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Av. Polígono s/n Cd. Industrial Lerma, Campeche, Campeche, Mexico
- Soil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsteeg 4, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Veikko Huhta
- Dept. of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Box 35, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Tunsisa T Hurisso
- Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, 1170 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, USA
- College of Agriculture, Environmental and Human Sciences, Lincoln University of Missouri, Jefferson City, MO, 65101, USA
| | - Basil V Iannone
- School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Madalina Iordache
- Sustainable Development and Environmental Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Banat "King Michael the 1st of Romania" from Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Ulrich Irmler
- Institute for Ecosystem Research, University of Kiel, Olshausenstrasse 40, 24098, Kiel, Germany
| | - Mari Ivask
- Tartu College, Tallinn University of Technology, Puiestee 78, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Juan B Jesús
- Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, University Complutense of Madrid, José Antonio Novais, 12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jodi L Johnson-Maynard
- Department of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive MS, 2340, Moscow, USA
| | - Monika Joschko
- Experimental Infrastructure Platform (EIP), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Eberswalder Str. 84, Müncheberg, Germany
| | - Nobuhiro Kaneko
- Faculty of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Fukushima University, Kanayagawa 1, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Radoslava Kanianska
- Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, Tajovského 40, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
| | - Aidan M Keith
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Maria L Kernecker
- Land Use and Governance, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Eberswalder Str. 84, Müncheberg, Germany
| | - Armand W Koné
- UFR Sciences de la Nature, UR Gestion Durable des Sols, Université Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Yahya Kooch
- Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, 46417-76489, Noor, Mazandaran, Iran
| | - Sanna T Kukkonen
- Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Survontie 9 A, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - H Lalthanzara
- Department of Zoology, Pachhunga University College, Aizawl, Mizoram, India
| | - Daniel R Lammel
- Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195, Berlin, Germany
| | - Iurii M Lebedev
- A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky pr., 33, Moscow, 119071, Russia
- M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 30-1 Bolshoy Boulevard, Moscow, 121205, Russia
| | | | - Noa K Lincoln
- Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 3190 Maile Way, St. John 102, Honolulu, USA
| | - Danilo López-Hernández
- Ecologia Aplicada, Instituto de Zoologia y Ecologia Tropical, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Los Chaguaramos, Ciudad Universitaria, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Scott R Loss
- Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, 008C, Ag Hall, Stillwater, USA
| | - Raphael Marichal
- UPR Systèmes de Pérennes, CIRAD, Univ Montpellier, TA B-34/02 Avenue Agropolis, Montpellier, France
| | - Radim Matula
- Department of Forest Ecology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Yukio Minamiya
- Tochigi Prefectural Museum, 2-2 Mutsumi-cho, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Jan Hendrik Moos
- Thuenen-Institute of Biodiversity, Bundesallee 65, Braunschweig, Germany
- Thuenen-Institute of Organic Farming, Trenthorst 32, Westerau, Germany
| | - Gerardo Moreno
- Plant Biology, Ecology and Earth Science, INDEHESA, University of Extremadura, Plasencia, Spain
| | - Alejandro Morón-Ríos
- Conservación de la Biodiversidad, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Av. Rancho, poligono 2 A, Cd. Industrial de Lerma, Campeche, Mexico
| | - Hasegawa Motohiro
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Doshisha University, Kyoto, 602-8580, Japan
| | - Bart Muys
- Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Division of Forest, Nature and Landscape, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E Box, 2411, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Neirynck
- Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Gaverstraat 35, 9500, Geraardsbergen, Belgium
| | - Lindsey Norgrove
- School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Länggasse 85, Zollikofen, Switzerland
| | - Marta Novo
- Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, University Complutense of Madrid, José Antonio Novais, 12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Visa Nuutinen
- Soil Ecosystems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Tietotie 4, Jokioinen, Finland
| | - Victoria Nuzzo
- Natural Area Consultants, 1 West Hill School Road, Richford, NY, USA
| | - P Mujeeb Rahman
- Department of Zoology, PSMO College, Tirurangadi, Malappuram, Kerala, India, Malappuram, India
| | - Johan Pansu
- CSIRO Ocean and Atmosphere, CSIRO, New Illawarra Road, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia
- UMR7144 Adaptation et Diversité en Milieu Marin, Station Biologique de Roscoff, CNRS/Sorbonne Université, Place Georges Teissier, Roscoff, France
| | - Shishir Paudel
- Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, 008C, Ag Hall, Stillwater, USA
- Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Guénola Pérès
- UMR ECOBIO (Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Evolution) CNRS-Université de Rennes, Station Biologique, 35380, Paimpont, France
- UMR SAS, INRAE, Institut Agro Agrocampus Ouest, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Lorenzo Pérez-Camacho
- Forest Ecology and Restoration Group, Department of Life Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28805, Alcalá De Henares, Spain
| | - Jean-François Ponge
- Adaptations du Vivant, CNRS UMR 7179, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 4 Avenue du Petit Château, Brunoy, France
| | - Jörg Prietzel
- Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Ramann-Str. 2, 85354, Freising, Germany
| | - Irina B Rapoport
- Tembotov Institute of Ecology of Mountain Territories, Russian Academy of Sciences, I. Armand, 37a, Nalchik, Russia
| | - Muhammad Imtiaz Rashid
- Center of Excellence in Environmental Studies, King Abdulaziz University, P.O Box 80216, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Salvador Rebollo
- Forest Ecology and Restoration Group, Department of Life Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28805, Alcalá De Henares, Spain
| | - Miguel Á Rodríguez
- Global Change Ecology and Evolution Research Group (GloCEE), Department of Life Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28805, Alcalá De Henares, Spain
| | - Alexander M Roth
- Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, 1530, Cleveland Ave. N, St. Paul, USA
- Friends of the Mississippi River, 101 E 5th St. Suite 2000, St Paul, USA
| | - Guillaume X Rousseau
- Agriculture engineering, Agroecology Postgraduate Program, Maranhão State University, Avenida Lourenço Vieira da Silva 1000, São Luis, Brazil
- Biology, Biodiversity and Conservation Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Maranhão, Avenida dos Portugueses 1966, São Luis, Brazil
| | - Anna Rozen
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, Poland
| | | | - Loes van Schaik
- Soil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsteeg 4, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bryant Scharenbroch
- College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, WI, 54481, USA
- The Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Route 53, Lisle, IL, 60532, USA
| | - Michael Schirrmann
- Department Engineering for Crop Production, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Olaf Schmidt
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Agriculture and Food Science Centre, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Boris Schröder
- Landscape Ecology and Environmental Systems Analysis, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Julia Seeber
- Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, Innsbruck, Austria
- Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, Bozen/Bolzano, Italy
| | - Maxim P Shashkov
- Laboratory of Ecosystem Modelling, Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya str., 2, Pushchino, Russia
- Laboratory of Computational Ecology, Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology RAS - the Branch of Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vitkevicha str., 1, Pushchino, Russia
| | - Jaswinder Singh
- Department of Zoology, Khalsa College Amritsar, Amritsar, Punjab, India
| | - Sandy M Smith
- Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Steinwandter
- Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, Bozen/Bolzano, Italy
| | - Katalin Szlavecz
- Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, USA
| | - José Antonio Talavera
- Department of animal biology, edaphology and geology, Faculty of Sciences (Biology), University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
| | - Dolores Trigo
- Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, University Complutense of Madrid, José Antonio Novais, 12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jiro Tsukamoto
- Forest Science, Kochi University, Monobe Otsu 200, Nankoku, Japan
| | - Sheila Uribe-López
- Juárez Autonomous University of Tabasco, Nanotechnology Engineering, Multidisciplinary Academic Division of Jalpa de Méndez, Carr. Estatal libre Villahermosa-Comalcalco, Km 27 S/N, C.P. 86205 Jalpa de Méndez, Tabasco, Mexico
| | - Anne W de Valença
- Unit Food & Agriculture, WWF-Netherlands, Driebergseweg 10, Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - Iñigo Virto
- Dpto. Ciencias, IS-FOOD, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Edificio Olivos - Campus Arrosadia, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Adrian A Wackett
- Department of Soil, Water and Climate, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St Paul, USA
| | - Matthew W Warren
- Earth Innovation Institute, 98 Battery Street Suite 250, San Francisco, USA
| | - Emily R Webster
- University of California Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, USA
| | - Nathaniel H Wehr
- Natural Resources & Environmental Management, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1910 East West Rd, Honolulu, USA
| | - Joann K Whalen
- Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada
| | | | - Volkmar Wolters
- Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26, Giessen, Germany
| | - Pengfei Wu
- Institute of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China
| | - Irina V Zenkova
- Laboratory of terrestrial ecosystems, Federal Research Centre "Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Institute of North Industrial Ecology Problems (INEP KSC RAS), Akademgorodok, 14a, Apatity, Murmansk, Province, Russia
| | - Weixin Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
| | - Erin K Cameron
- Department of Environmental Science, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Post Office Box 65, FI 00014, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Nico Eisenhauer
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Temporal persistence of taxonomic and functional composition in bird communities of urban areas: an evaluation after a 6-year gap in data collection. Urban Ecosyst 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11252-021-01132-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
108
|
Loiseau N, Thuiller W, Stuart-Smith RD, Devictor V, Edgar GJ, Velez L, Cinner JE, Graham NAJ, Renaud J, Hoey AS, Manel S, Mouillot D. Maximizing regional biodiversity requires a mosaic of protection levels. PLoS Biol 2021; 19:e3001195. [PMID: 34010287 PMCID: PMC8133472 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Protected areas are the flagship management tools to secure biodiversity from anthropogenic impacts. However, the extent to which adjacent areas with distinct protection levels host different species numbers and compositions remains uncertain. Here, using reef fishes, European alpine plants, and North American birds, we show that the composition of species in adjacent Strictly Protected, Restricted, and Non-Protected areas is highly dissimilar, whereas the number of species is similar, after controlling for environmental conditions, sample size, and rarity. We find that between 12% and 15% of species are only recorded in Non-Protected areas, suggesting that a non-negligible part of regional biodiversity occurs where human activities are less regulated. For imperiled species, the proportion only recorded in Strictly Protected areas reaches 58% for fishes, 11% for birds, and 7% for plants, highlighting the fundamental and unique role of protected areas and their environmental conditions in biodiversity conservation. This study shows that the dissimilarity in species composition between sites with different levels of protection is consistently high, suggesting that adjacent and connected areas with different protection levels host very dissimilar species assemblages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Loiseau
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, F-38000 Grenoble, France
- CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Wilfried Thuiller
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, F-38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Rick D. Stuart-Smith
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Vincent Devictor
- CNRS, ISEM, Université de Montpellier, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France
| | - Graham J. Edgar
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Laure Velez
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - Joshua E. Cinner
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Julien Renaud
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, F-38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Andrew S. Hoey
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - Stephanie Manel
- EPHE, PSL Research University, CNRS, UM, SupAgro, IRD, INRA, UMR 5175 CEFE, F-Montpellier, France
| | - David Mouillot
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France
- Institut Universitaire de France, IUF, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Abstract
Most animal species on Earth are insects, and recent reports suggest that their abundance is in drastic decline. Although these reports come from a wide range of insect taxa and regions, the evidence to assess the extent of the phenomenon is sparse. Insect populations are challenging to study, and most monitoring methods are labor intensive and inefficient. Advances in computer vision and deep learning provide potential new solutions to this global challenge. Cameras and other sensors can effectively, continuously, and noninvasively perform entomological observations throughout diurnal and seasonal cycles. The physical appearance of specimens can also be captured by automated imaging in the laboratory. When trained on these data, deep learning models can provide estimates of insect abundance, biomass, and diversity. Further, deep learning models can quantify variation in phenotypic traits, behavior, and interactions. Here, we connect recent developments in deep learning and computer vision to the urgent demand for more cost-efficient monitoring of insects and other invertebrates. We present examples of sensor-based monitoring of insects. We show how deep learning tools can be applied to exceptionally large datasets to derive ecological information and discuss the challenges that lie ahead for the implementation of such solutions in entomology. We identify four focal areas, which will facilitate this transformation: 1) validation of image-based taxonomic identification; 2) generation of sufficient training data; 3) development of public, curated reference databases; and 4) solutions to integrate deep learning and molecular tools.
Collapse
|
110
|
Zu P, Koch H, Schwery O, Pironon S, Phillips C, Ondo I, Farrell IW, Nes WD, Moore E, Wright GA, Farman DI, Stevenson PC. Pollen sterols are associated with phylogeny and environment but not with pollinator guilds. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2021; 230:1169-1184. [PMID: 33484583 PMCID: PMC8653887 DOI: 10.1111/nph.17227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Phytosterols are primary plant metabolites that have fundamental structural and regulatory functions. They are also essential nutrients for phytophagous insects, including pollinators, that cannot synthesize sterols. Despite the well-described composition and diversity in vegetative plant tissues, few studies have examined phytosterol diversity in pollen. We quantified 25 pollen phytosterols in 122 plant species (105 genera, 51 families) to determine their composition and diversity across plant taxa. We searched literature and databases for plant phylogeny, environmental conditions, and pollinator guilds of the species to examine the relationships with pollen sterols. 24-methylenecholesterol, sitosterol and isofucosterol were the most common and abundant pollen sterols. We found phylogenetic clustering of twelve individual sterols, total sterol content and sterol diversity, and of sterol groupings that reflect their underlying biosynthesis pathway (C-24 alkylation, ring B desaturation). Plants originating in tropical-like climates (higher mean annual temperature, lower temperature seasonality, higher precipitation in wettest quarter) were more likely to record higher pollen sterol content. However, pollen sterol composition and content showed no clear relationship with pollinator guilds. Our study is the first to show that pollen sterol diversity is phylogenetically clustered and that pollen sterol content may adapt to environmental conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengjuan Zu
- Royal Botanic GardensKew, Natural Capital and Plant Health DepartmentRichmondSurreyTW9 3ABUK
- Department Fish Ecology and EvolutionSwiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and TechnologySeestrasse 79KastanienbaumCH‐6047Switzerland
| | - Hauke Koch
- Royal Botanic GardensKew, Natural Capital and Plant Health DepartmentRichmondSurreyTW9 3ABUK
| | - Orlando Schwery
- New Mexico Consortium4200 W. Jemez Rd, Suite 301Los AlamosNM87544USA
| | - Samuel Pironon
- Royal Botanic GardensKew, Biodiversity Informatics and Spatial Analysis DepartmentRichmondSurreyTW9 3ABUK
| | - Charlotte Phillips
- Royal Botanic GardensKew, Biodiversity Informatics and Spatial Analysis DepartmentRichmondSurreyTW9 3ABUK
- Royal Botanic GardensKew, Conservation Science DepartmentWakehurst PlaceArdinglyWest SussexRH17 6TNUK
| | - Ian Ondo
- Royal Botanic GardensKew, Biodiversity Informatics and Spatial Analysis DepartmentRichmondSurreyTW9 3ABUK
| | - Iain W. Farrell
- Royal Botanic GardensKew, Natural Capital and Plant Health DepartmentRichmondSurreyTW9 3ABUK
| | - W. David Nes
- Department of Chemistry & BiochemistryTexas Tech UniversityLubbockTX79424USA
| | - Elynor Moore
- Department of ZoologyUniversity of Oxford11a Mansfield RoadOxfordOX1 3SZUK
| | | | - Dudley I. Farman
- Natural Resources InstituteUniversity of GreenwichChatham, KentME4 4TBUK
| | - Philip C. Stevenson
- Royal Botanic GardensKew, Natural Capital and Plant Health DepartmentRichmondSurreyTW9 3ABUK
- Natural Resources InstituteUniversity of GreenwichChatham, KentME4 4TBUK
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Antão LH, Magurran AE, Dornelas M. The Shape of Species Abundance Distributions Across Spatial Scales. Front Ecol Evol 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.626730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Species abundance distributions (SADs) describe community structure and are a key component of biodiversity theory and research. Although different distributions have been proposed to represent SADs at different scales, a systematic empirical assessment of how SAD shape varies across wide scale gradients is lacking. Here, we examined 11 empirical large-scale datasets for a wide range of taxa and used maximum likelihood methods to compare the fit of the logseries, lognormal, and multimodal (i.e., with multiple modes of abundance) models to SADs across a scale gradient spanning several orders of magnitude. Overall, there was a higher prevalence of multimodality for larger spatial extents, whereas the logseries was exclusively selected as best fit for smaller areas. For many communities the shape of the SAD at the largest spatial extent (either lognormal or multimodal) was conserved across the scale gradient, despite steep declines in area and taxonomic diversity sampled. Additionally, SAD shape was affected by species richness, but we did not detect a systematic effect of the total number of individuals. Our results reveal clear departures from the predictions of two major macroecological theories of biodiversity for SAD shape. Specifically, neither the Neutral Theory of Biodiversity (NTB) nor the Maximum Entropy Theory of Ecology (METE) are able to accommodate the variability in SAD shape we encountered. This is highlighted by the inadequacy of the logseries distribution at larger scales, contrary to predictions of the NTB, and by departures from METE expectation across scales. Importantly, neither theory accounts for multiple modes in SADs. We suggest our results are underpinned by both inter- and intraspecific spatial aggregation patterns, highlighting the importance of spatial distributions as determinants of biodiversity patterns. Critical developments for macroecological biodiversity theories remain in incorporating the effect of spatial scale, ecological heterogeneity and spatial aggregation patterns in determining SAD shape.
Collapse
|
112
|
Mentges A, Blowes SA, Hodapp D, Hillebrand H, Chase JM. Effects of site-selection bias on estimates of biodiversity change. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2021; 35:688-698. [PMID: 32808693 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Estimates of biodiversity change are essential for the management and conservation of ecosystems. Accurate estimates rely on selecting representative sites, but monitoring often focuses on sites of special interest. How such site-selection biases influence estimates of biodiversity change is largely unknown. Site-selection bias potentially occurs across four major sources of biodiversity data, decreasing in likelihood from citizen science, museums, national park monitoring, and academic research. We defined site-selection bias as a preference for sites that are either densely populated (i.e., abundance bias) or species rich (i.e., richness bias). We simulated biodiversity change in a virtual landscape and tracked the observed biodiversity at a sampled site. The site was selected either randomly or with a site-selection bias. We used a simple spatially resolved, individual-based model to predict the movement or dispersal of individuals in and out of the chosen sampling site. Site-selection bias exaggerated estimates of biodiversity loss in sites selected with a bias by on average 300-400% compared with randomly selected sites. Based on our simulations, site-selection bias resulted in positive trends being estimated as negative trends: richness increase was estimated as 0.1 in randomly selected sites, whereas sites selected with a bias showed a richness change of -0.1 to -0.2 on average. Thus, site-selection bias may falsely indicate decreases in biodiversity. We varied sampling design and characteristics of the species and found that site-selection biases were strongest in short time series, for small grains, organisms with low dispersal ability, large regional species pools, and strong spatial aggregation. Based on these findings, to minimize site-selection bias, we recommend use of systematic site-selection schemes; maximizing sampling area; calculating biodiversity measures cumulatively across plots; and use of biodiversity measures that are less sensitive to rare species, such as the effective number of species. Awareness of the potential impact of site-selection bias is needed for biodiversity monitoring, the design of new studies on biodiversity change, and the interpretation of existing data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Mentges
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
- Institute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 1, Halle (Saale), 06120, Germany
- Leipzig University, Augustusplatz 10, Leipzig, 04109
| | - Shane A Blowes
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
- Institute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 1, Halle (Saale), 06120, Germany
| | - Dorothee Hodapp
- Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg (HIFMB), Ammerländer Heerstraße 231, Oldenburg, 26129, Germany
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz-Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Am Handelshafen 12, Bremerhaven, 27570, Germany
| | - Helmut Hillebrand
- Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg (HIFMB), Ammerländer Heerstraße 231, Oldenburg, 26129, Germany
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz-Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Am Handelshafen 12, Bremerhaven, 27570, Germany
- Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Schleusenstraße 1, Wilhelmshaven, 26382, Germany
| | - Jonathan M Chase
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
- Institute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 1, Halle (Saale), 06120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Tatsumi S, Iritani R, Cadotte MW. Temporal changes in spatial variation: partitioning the extinction and colonisation components of beta diversity. Ecol Lett 2021; 24:1063-1072. [PMID: 33715273 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The last two decades have witnessed unprecedented changes in beta diversity, the spatial variation in species composition, from local to global scales. However, analytical challenges have hampered empirical ecologists from quantifying the extinction and colonisation processes behind these changing beta diversity patterns. Here, we develop a novel numerical method to additively partition the temporal changes in beta diversity into components that reflect local extinctions and colonisations. By applying this method to empirical datasets, we revealed spatiotemporal community dynamics that were otherwise undetectable. In mature forests, we found that local extinctions resulted in tree communities becoming more spatially heterogeneous, while colonisations simultaneously caused them to homogenise. In coral communities, we detected non-random community disassembly and reassembly following an environmental perturbation, with a temporally varying balance between extinctions and colonisations. Partitioning the dynamic processes that underlie beta diversity can provide more mechanistic insights into the spatiotemporal organisation of biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Tatsumi
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Hokkaido Research Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Iritani
- RIKEN Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences (iTHEMS), Wako, Saitama, Japan
| | - Marc W Cadotte
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Ross SRP, Suzuki Y, Kondoh M, Suzuki K, Villa Martín P, Dornelas M. Illuminating the intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of ecological stability across scales. Ecol Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/1440-1703.12214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel R. P.‐J. Ross
- Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland
| | - Yuka Suzuki
- Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University Okinawa Japan
| | - Michio Kondoh
- Graduate School of Life Sciences Tohoku University Sendai Japan
| | - Kenta Suzuki
- Integrated Bioresource Information Division RIKEN BioResource Research Center Ibaraki Japan
| | - Paula Villa Martín
- Biological Complexity Unit Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University Okinawa Japan
| | - Maria Dornelas
- Centre for Biological Diversity University of St Andrews St Andrews UK
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Thompson MSA, Couce E, Webb TJ, Grace M, Cooper KM, Schratzberger M. What's hot and what's not: Making sense of biodiversity 'hotspots'. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2021; 27:521-535. [PMID: 33159828 PMCID: PMC7839497 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Conserving biogeographic regions with especially high biodiversity, known as biodiversity 'hotspots', is intuitive because finite resources can be focussed towards manageable units. Yet, biodiversity, environmental conditions and their relationship are more complex with multidimensional properties. Assessments which ignore this risk failing to detect change, identify its direction or gauge the scale of appropriate intervention. Conflicting concepts which assume assemblages as either sharply delineated communities or loosely collected species have also hampered progress in the way we assess and conserve biodiversity. We focus on the marine benthos where delineating manageable areas for conservation is an attractive prospect because it holds most marine species and constitutes the largest single ecosystem on earth by area. Using two large UK marine benthic faunal datasets, we present a spatially gridded data sampling design to account for survey effects which would otherwise be the principal drivers of diversity estimates. We then assess γ-diversity (regional richness) with diversity partitioned between α (local richness) and β (dissimilarity), and their change in relation to covariates to test whether defining and conserving biodiversity hotspots is an effective conservation strategy in light of the prevailing forces structuring those assemblages. α-, β- and γ-diversity hotspots were largely inconsistent with each metric relating uniquely to the covariates, and loosely collected species generally prevailed with relatively few distinct assemblages. Hotspots could therefore be an unreliable means to direct conservation efforts if based on only a component part of diversity. When assessed alongside environmental gradients, α-, β- and γ-diversity provide a multidimensional but still intuitive perspective of biodiversity change that can direct conservation towards key drivers and the appropriate scale for intervention. Our study also highlights possible temporal declines in species richness over 30 years and thus the need for future integrated monitoring to reveal the causal drivers of biodiversity change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murray S. A. Thompson
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft LaboratoryLowestoftSuffolkUK
| | - Elena Couce
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft LaboratoryLowestoftSuffolkUK
| | - Thomas J. Webb
- Department of Animal & Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Miriam Grace
- Department of Animal & Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Keith M. Cooper
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft LaboratoryLowestoftSuffolkUK
| | - Michaela Schratzberger
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft LaboratoryLowestoftSuffolkUK
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Ontiveros VJ, Capitán JA, Casamayor EO, Alonso D. The characteristic time of ecological communities. Ecology 2021; 102:e03247. [PMID: 33217780 PMCID: PMC7900965 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A simple description of temporal dynamics of ecological communities may help us understand how community assembly proceeds, predict ecological responses to environmental disturbances, and improve the performance of biological conservation actions. Although community changes take place at multiple temporal scales, the variation of species composition and richness over time across communities and habitats shows general patterns that may potentially reveal the main drivers of community dynamics. We used the simplest stochastic model of island biogeography to propose two quantities to characterize community dynamics: the community characteristic time, as a measure of the typical time scale of species‐richness change, and the characteristic Jaccard index, as a measure of temporal β diversity, that is, the variation of community composition over time. In addition, the community characteristic time, which sets the temporal scale at which null, noninteracting species assemblages operate, allowed us to define a relative sampling frequency (to the characteristic time). Here we estimate these quantities across microbial and macroscopic species assemblages to highlight two related results. First, we illustrated both characteristic time and Jaccard index and their relation with classic time‐series in ecology, and found that the most thoroughly sampled communities, relative to their characteristic time, presented the largest similarity between consecutive samples. Second, our analysis across a variety of habitats and taxa show that communities span a large range of species turnover, from potentially very fast (short characteristic times) to rather slow (long characteristic times) communities. This was in agreement with previous knowledge, but indicated that some habitats may have been sampled less frequently than required. Our work provides new perspectives to explore the temporal component in ecological studies and highlights the usefulness of simple approximations to the complex dynamics of ecological communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente J Ontiveros
- Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Spanish Council for Scientific Research, Acces Cala St. Francesc 14, Blanes, E-17300, Spain
| | - José A Capitán
- Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Spanish Council for Scientific Research, Acces Cala St. Francesc 14, Blanes, E-17300, Spain.,Complex Systems Group, Department of Applied Mathematics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Juan de Herrera, 6, Madrid, E-28040, Spain
| | - Emilio O Casamayor
- Integrative Freshwater Ecology Group, Centre of Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Spanish Council for Scientific Research, Accés Cala St. Francesc 14, Blanes, E-17300, Spain
| | - David Alonso
- Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Spanish Council for Scientific Research, Acces Cala St. Francesc 14, Blanes, E-17300, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Record S, Voelker NM, Zarnetske PL, Wisnoski NI, Tonkin JD, Swan C, Marazzi L, Lany N, Lamy T, Compagnoni A, Castorani MCN, Andrade R, Sokol ER. Novel Insights to Be Gained From Applying Metacommunity Theory to Long-Term, Spatially Replicated Biodiversity Data. Front Ecol Evol 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.612794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Global loss of biodiversity and its associated ecosystem services is occurring at an alarming rate and is predicted to accelerate in the future. Metacommunity theory provides a framework to investigate multi-scale processes that drive change in biodiversity across space and time. Short-term ecological studies across space have progressed our understanding of biodiversity through a metacommunity lens, however, such snapshots in time have been limited in their ability to explain which processes, at which scales, generate observed spatial patterns. Temporal dynamics of metacommunities have been understudied, and large gaps in theory and empirical data have hindered progress in our understanding of underlying metacommunity processes that give rise to biodiversity patterns. Fortunately, we are at an important point in the history of ecology, where long-term studies with cross-scale spatial replication provide a means to gain a deeper understanding of the multiscale processes driving biodiversity patterns in time and space to inform metacommunity theory. The maturation of coordinated research and observation networks, such as the United States Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) program, provides an opportunity to advance explanation and prediction of biodiversity change with observational and experimental data at spatial and temporal scales greater than any single research group could accomplish. Synthesis of LTER network community datasets illustrates that long-term studies with spatial replication present an under-utilized resource for advancing spatio-temporal metacommunity research. We identify challenges towards synthesizing these data and present recommendations for addressing these challenges. We conclude with insights about how future monitoring efforts by coordinated research and observation networks could further the development of metacommunity theory and its applications aimed at improving conservation efforts.
Collapse
|
118
|
Ladouceur E, Shackelford N. The power of data synthesis to shape the future of the restoration community and capacity. Restor Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Ladouceur
- Biodiversity Synthesis & Physiological Diversity German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Leipzig‐Halle‐Jena Leipzig Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Germany
- Biodiversity Synthesis, Institute of Computer Science Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle (Saale) 06120 Germany
- Physiological Diversity Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Germany
| | - Nancy Shackelford
- School of Environmental Studies University of Victoria 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria British Columbia V8P 5C2 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
A. Maureaud A, Frelat R, Pécuchet L, Shackell N, Mérigot B, Pinsky ML, Amador K, Anderson SC, Arkhipkin A, Auber A, Barri I, Bell RJ, Belmaker J, Beukhof E, Camara ML, Guevara‐Carrasco R, Choi J, Christensen HT, Conner J, Cubillos LA, Diadhiou HD, Edelist D, Emblemsvåg M, Ernst B, Fairweather TP, Fock HO, Friedland KD, Garcia CB, Gascuel D, Gislason H, Goren M, Guitton J, Jouffre D, Hattab T, Hidalgo M, Kathena JN, Knuckey I, Kidé SO, Koen‐Alonso M, Koopman M, Kulik V, León JP, Levitt‐Barmats Y, Lindegren M, Llope M, Massiot‐Granier F, Masski H, McLean M, Meissa B, Mérillet L, Mihneva V, Nunoo FKE, O'Driscoll R, O'Leary CA, Petrova E, Ramos JE, Refes W, Román‐Marcote E, Siegstad H, Sobrino I, Sólmundsson J, Sonin O, Spies I, Steingrund P, Stephenson F, Stern N, Tserkova F, Tserpes G, Tzanatos E, van Rijn I, van Zwieten PAM, Vasilakopoulos P, Yepsen DV, Ziegler P, T. Thorson J. Are we ready to track climate-driven shifts in marine species across international boundaries? - A global survey of scientific bottom trawl data. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2021; 27:220-236. [PMID: 33067925 PMCID: PMC7756400 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Marine biota are redistributing at a rapid pace in response to climate change and shifting seascapes. While changes in fish populations and community structure threaten the sustainability of fisheries, our capacity to adapt by tracking and projecting marine species remains a challenge due to data discontinuities in biological observations, lack of data availability, and mismatch between data and real species distributions. To assess the extent of this challenge, we review the global status and accessibility of ongoing scientific bottom trawl surveys. In total, we gathered metadata for 283,925 samples from 95 surveys conducted regularly from 2001 to 2019. We identified that 59% of the metadata collected are not publicly available, highlighting that the availability of data is the most important challenge to assess species redistributions under global climate change. Given that the primary purpose of surveys is to provide independent data to inform stock assessment of commercially important populations, we further highlight that single surveys do not cover the full range of the main commercial demersal fish species. An average of 18 surveys is needed to cover at least 50% of species ranges, demonstrating the importance of combining multiple surveys to evaluate species range shifts. We assess the potential for combining surveys to track transboundary species redistributions and show that differences in sampling schemes and inconsistency in sampling can be overcome with spatio-temporal modeling to follow species density redistributions. In light of our global assessment, we establish a framework for improving the management and conservation of transboundary and migrating marine demersal species. We provide directions to improve data availability and encourage countries to share survey data, to assess species vulnerabilities, and to support management adaptation in a time of climate-driven ocean changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurore A. Maureaud
- Centre for Ocean LifeNational Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua)Technical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark
- Section for Ecosystem based Marine ManagementNational Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua)Technical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark
| | - Romain Frelat
- Aquaculture and Fisheries GroupWageningen University & ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Laurène Pécuchet
- Norwegian College of Fishery ScienceUiT The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
| | - Nancy Shackell
- Fisheries and Oceans CanadaBedford Institute of OceanographyDartmouthNSCanada
| | | | - Malin L. Pinsky
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural ResourcesRutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickNJUSA
| | - Kofi Amador
- Fisheries Scientific Survey DivisionFisheries CommissionTemaGhana
| | - Sean C. Anderson
- Fisheries and Oceans CanadaPacific Biological StationNanaimoBCCanada
| | - Alexander Arkhipkin
- Falkland Islands Fisheries DepartmentDirectorate of Natural ResourcesStanleyFalkland Islands
| | - Arnaud Auber
- Halieutique Manche Mer du Nord unitFrench Research Institute for the Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER)Boulogne‐sur‐MerFrance
| | - Iça Barri
- Centro de Investigaçao Pesqueira Aplicada (CIPA)BissauGuinea‐Bissau
| | | | - Jonathan Belmaker
- School of Zoology and The Steinhardt Museum of Natural HistoryTel AvivIsrael
| | | | - Mohamed L. Camara
- HalieuteNational Center of Fisheries Sciences of BoussouraConakryRepublic of Guinea
| | - Renato Guevara‐Carrasco
- General Directorate of Demersal and Coastal Resources ResearchInstituto del Mar Perú (IMARPE)CallaoPerú
| | - Junghwa Choi
- Fisheries Resources Research CenterNational Institute of Fisheries ScienceTongyeong‐siKorea
| | | | - Jason Conner
- Resource Assessment and Conservation Engineering, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries ServiceNOAASeattleWAUSA
| | - Luis A. Cubillos
- COPAS Sur‐AustralDepartamento de OceanografíaUniversity of ConcepcionConcepciónChile
| | | | - Dori Edelist
- Recanati Institute for Maritime Studies and Department of Maritime CivilizationsCharney School of Marine SciencesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
| | | | - Billy Ernst
- Millennium Nucleus of Ecology and Sustainable Management of Oceanic Islands (ESMOI)Departamento de OceanografíaFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y OceanográficasUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile
| | | | - Heino O. Fock
- Thuenen Institute of Sea FisheriesBremerhavenGermany
| | - Kevin D. Friedland
- Narragansett LaboratoryNational Marine Fisheries ServiceNarragansettRIUSA
| | - Camilo B. Garcia
- Departamento de BiologiaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotáColombia
| | - Didier Gascuel
- ESE, Ecology and Ecosystem HealthInstitut AgroRennesFrance
| | - Henrik Gislason
- Section for Ecosystem based Marine ManagementNational Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua)Technical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark
| | - Menachem Goren
- School of Zoology and The Steinhardt Museum of Natural HistoryTel AvivIsrael
| | - Jérôme Guitton
- ESE, Ecology and Ecosystem HealthInstitut AgroRennesFrance
| | | | | | - Manuel Hidalgo
- Ecosystem Oceanography Group (GRECO)Instituto Español de OceanografíaCentre Oceanogràfic de les BalearsPalma de MallorcaSpain
| | - Johannes N. Kathena
- National Marine Information and Research CentreMinistry of Fisheries and Marine Resources (MFMR)SwakopmundNamibia
| | - Ian Knuckey
- Fishwell Consulting Pty LtdQueenscliffVic.Australia
| | - Saïkou O. Kidé
- Institut Mauritanien de Recherches Océanographiques et des PêchesNouadhibouMauritania
| | - Mariano Koen‐Alonso
- Northwest Atlantic Fisheries CentreFisheries and Oceans CanadaSt. John'sNLCanada
| | - Matt Koopman
- Fishwell Consulting Pty LtdQueenscliffVic.Australia
| | - Vladimir Kulik
- Pacific Branch (TINRO) of Russian Federal Research Institute Of Fisheries and Oceanography (VNIRO)VladivostokRussia
| | - Jacqueline Palacios León
- General Directorate of Demersal and Coastal Resources ResearchInstituto del Mar Perú (IMARPE)CallaoPerú
| | | | - Martin Lindegren
- Centre for Ocean LifeNational Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua)Technical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark
| | - Marcos Llope
- Instituto Español de OceanografíaCádizAndalucíaSpain
| | - Félix Massiot‐Granier
- Département Adaptations du vivantUMR BOREAMuseum National d’Histoire NaturelleParisFrance
| | - Hicham Masski
- Institut National de Recherche HalieutiqueCasablancaMorocco
| | - Matthew McLean
- Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNSCanada
| | - Beyah Meissa
- Institut Mauritanien de Recherches Océanographiques et des PêchesNouadhibouMauritania
| | - Laurène Mérillet
- National Museum of Natural HistoryParisFrance
- IfremerLorientFrance
| | | | | | - Richard O'Driscoll
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research LimitedWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Cecilia A. O'Leary
- Resource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, Alaska Fisheries Science CenterNOAASeattleWAUSA
| | | | - Jorge E. Ramos
- Falkland Islands Fisheries DepartmentDirectorate of Natural ResourcesStanleyFalkland Islands
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic StudiesUniversity of TasmaniaHobartTas.Australia
| | - Wahid Refes
- National Higher School of Marine Sciences and Coastal ManagementDély IbrahimAlgeria
| | | | | | | | | | - Oren Sonin
- Israeli Fisheries Division, Fisheries and Aquaculture DepartmentMinistry of AgricultureKiryat HaimIsrael
| | - Ingrid Spies
- Resource Ecology and Fisheries Management, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries ServiceNOAASeattleWAUSA
| | | | - Fabrice Stephenson
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research LimitedWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Nir Stern
- Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research InstituteHaifaIsrael
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul A. M. van Zwieten
- Aquaculture and Fisheries GroupWageningen University & ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Daniela V. Yepsen
- Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias con Mención en Manejo de Recursos Acuáticos Renovables (MaReA)Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y OceanográficasUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile
| | - Philippe Ziegler
- Antarctic Conservation and Management ProgramAustralian Antarctic DivisionDepartment of Agriculture, Water, and the EnvironmentKingstonTas.Australia
| | - James T. Thorson
- Habitat and Ecological Processes Research ProgramAlaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries ServiceNOAASeattleWAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Rishworth GM, Adams JB, Bird MS, Carrasco NK, Dänhardt A, Dannheim J, Lemley DA, Pistorius PA, Scheiffarth G, Hillebrand H. Cross-continental analysis of coastal biodiversity change. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2020; 375:20190452. [PMID: 33131440 PMCID: PMC7662198 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Whereas the anthropogenic impact on marine biodiversity is undebated, the quantification and prediction of this change are not trivial. Simple traditional measures of biodiversity (e.g. richness, diversity indices) do not capture the magnitude and direction of changes in species or functional composition. In this paper, we apply recently developed methods for measuring biodiversity turnover to time-series data of four broad taxonomic groups from two coastal regions: the southern North Sea (Germany) and the South African coast. Both areas share geomorphological features and ecosystem types, allowing for a critical assessment of the most informative metrics of biodiversity change across organism groups. We found little evidence for directional trends in univariate metrics of diversity for either the effective number of taxa or the amount of richness change. However, turnover in composition was high (on average nearly 30% of identities when addressing presence or absence of species) and even higher when taking the relative dominance of species into account. This turnover accumulated over time at similar rates across regions and organism groups. We conclude that biodiversity metrics responsive to turnover provide a more accurate reflection of community change relative to conventional metrics (absolute richness or relative abundance) and are spatially broadly applicable. This article is part of the theme issue 'Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin M. Rishworth
- Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa
- Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa
| | - Janine B. Adams
- Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa
| | - Matthew S. Bird
- Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
| | - Nicola K. Carrasco
- School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa
| | - Andreas Dänhardt
- Lower Saxon Wadden Sea National Park Authority, Virchowstr. 1 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| | - Jennifer Dannheim
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12 D-27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
- Helmholtz-Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg [HIFMB], Ammerländer Heerstrasse 231 26129 Oldenbburg, Germany
| | - Daniel A. Lemley
- Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa
| | - Pierre A. Pistorius
- Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa
| | - Gregor Scheiffarth
- Institute for Chemistry and Biology of Marine Environments [ICBM], Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Schleusenstrasse 1 D-26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| | - Helmut Hillebrand
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12 D-27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
- Helmholtz-Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg [HIFMB], Ammerländer Heerstrasse 231 26129 Oldenbburg, Germany
- Institute for Chemistry and Biology of Marine Environments [ICBM], Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Schleusenstrasse 1 D-26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Heinicke S, Ordaz-Németh I, Junker J, Bachmann ME, Marrocoli S, Wessling EG, Byler D, Cheyne SM, Desmond J, Dowd D, Fitzgerald M, Fourrier M, Goedmakers A, Hernandez-Aguilar RA, Hillers A, Hockings KJ, Jones S, Kaiser M, Koops K, Lapuente JM, Maisels F, Riedel J, Terrade E, Tweh CG, Vergnes V, Vogt T, Williamson EA, Kühl HS. Open-access platform to synthesize knowledge of ape conservation across sites. Am J Primatol 2020; 83:e23213. [PMID: 33169878 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Despite the large body of literature on ape conservation, much of the data needed for evidence-based conservation decision-making is still not readily accessible and standardized, rendering cross-site comparison difficult. To support knowledge synthesis and to complement the IUCN SSC Ape Populations, Environments and Surveys database, we created the A.P.E.S. Wiki (https://apeswiki.eva.mpg.de), an open-access platform providing site-level information on ape conservation status and context. The aim of this Wiki is to provide information and data about geographical ape locations, to curate information on individuals and organizations active in ape research and conservation, and to act as a tool to support collaboration between conservation practitioners, scientists, and other stakeholders. To illustrate the process and benefits of knowledge synthesis, we used the momentum of the update of the conservation action plan for western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) and began with this critically endangered taxon. First, we gathered information on 59 sites in West Africa from scientific publications, reports, and online sources. Information was compiled in a standardized format and can thus be summarized using a web scraping approach. We then asked experts working at those sites to review and complement the information (20 sites have been reviewed to date). We demonstrate the utility of the information available through the Wiki, for example, for studying species distribution. Importantly, as an open-access platform and based on the well-known wiki layout, the A.P.E.S. Wiki can contribute to direct and interactive information sharing and promote the efforts invested by the ape research and conservation community. The Section on Great Apes and the Section on Small Apes of the IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group will guide and support the expansion of the platform to all small and great ape taxa. Similar collaborative efforts can contribute to extending knowledge synthesis to all nonhuman primate species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Heinicke
- Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.,German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Leipzig-Jena, Leipzig, Germany.,Transformation Pathways, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Isabel Ordaz-Németh
- Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jessica Junker
- Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.,German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Leipzig-Jena, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mona E Bachmann
- Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.,German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Leipzig-Jena, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Geography, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Erin G Wessling
- Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dirck Byler
- Section on Great Apes, IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Susan M Cheyne
- Section on Small Apes, IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Oxford, UK.,Borneo Nature Foundation, Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.,Department of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Jenny Desmond
- Liberia Chimpanzee Rescue & Protection, Monrovia, Liberia
| | - Dervla Dowd
- Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (West Africa Representation), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
| | | | | | | | - R Adriana Hernandez-Aguilar
- Department of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, Spain.,Jane Goodall Institute Spain and Senegal, Dindefelo Biological Station, Dindefelo, Kedougou, Senegal
| | | | - Kimberley J Hockings
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK
| | - Sorrel Jones
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, UK.,School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Michael Kaiser
- Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kathelijne Koops
- Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Juan M Lapuente
- Comoé Chimpanzee Conservation Project, Comoé National Park, Kakpin, Ivory Coast
| | - Fiona Maisels
- Global Conservation Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA.,Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Julia Riedel
- Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.,Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (West Africa Representation), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Emilien Terrade
- Mongolian Bankhar Dog Project, Hustai National Park, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
| | - Clement G Tweh
- Wild Chimpanzee Foundation, Monrovia, Liberia.,School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Virginie Vergnes
- Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (West Africa Representation), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Tina Vogt
- Elephant Research and Conservation, Saal/Donau, Germany
| | | | - Hjalmar S Kühl
- Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.,German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Leipzig-Jena, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Hillebrand H, Jacob U, Leslie HM. Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2020; 375:20190444. [PMID: 33131441 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Whereas the conservation and management of biodiversity has become a key issue in environmental sciences and policy in general, the conservation of marine biodiversity faces additional challenges such as the challenges of accessing field sites (e.g. polar, deep sea), knowledge gaps regarding biodiversity trends, high mobility of many organisms in fluid environments, and ecosystem-specific obstacles to stakeholder engagement and governance. This issue comprises contributions from a diverse international group of scientists in a benchmarking volume for a common research agenda on marine conservation. We begin by addressing information gaps on marine biodiversity trends through novel approaches and technologies, then linking such information to ecosystem functioning through a focus on traits. We then leverage the knowledge of these relationships to inform theory aiming at predicting the future composition and functioning of marine communities. Finally, we elucidate the linkages between marine ecosystems and human societies by examining economic, management and governance approaches that contribute to effective marine conservation in practice. This article is part of the theme issue 'Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Hillebrand
- Institute for Chemistry and Biology of Marine Environments [ICBM], Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Schleusenstrasse 1, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany.,Helmholtz-Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg [HIFMB], Ammerländer Heerstrasse 231, 26129 Oldenbburg, Germany.,Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Ute Jacob
- Helmholtz-Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg [HIFMB], Ammerländer Heerstrasse 231, 26129 Oldenbburg, Germany.,Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Heather M Leslie
- Darling Marine Center and School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, 193 Clarks Cove Road, Walpole, ME 04573, USA
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Kühl HS, Bowler DE, Bösch L, Bruelheide H, Dauber J, Eichenberg D, Eisenhauer N, Fernández N, Guerra CA, Henle K, Herbinger I, Isaac NJ, Jansen F, König-Ries B, Kühn I, Nilsen EB, Pe'er G, Richter A, Schulte R, Settele J, van Dam NM, Voigt M, Wägele WJ, Wirth C, Bonn A. Effective Biodiversity Monitoring Needs a Culture of Integration. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
124
|
Rethinking climate context dependencies in biological terms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:23208-23210. [PMID: 32879001 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016537117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
125
|
Thorn S, Chao A, Georgiev KB, Müller J, Bässler C, Campbell JL, Castro J, Chen YH, Choi CY, Cobb TP, Donato DC, Durska E, Macdonald E, Feldhaar H, Fontaine JB, Fornwalt PJ, Hernández RMH, Hutto RL, Koivula M, Lee EJ, Lindenmayer D, Mikusiński G, Obrist MK, Perlík M, Rost J, Waldron K, Wermelinger B, Weiß I, Żmihorski M, Leverkus AB. Estimating retention benchmarks for salvage logging to protect biodiversity. Nat Commun 2020; 11:4762. [PMID: 32958767 PMCID: PMC7505835 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18612-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Forests are increasingly affected by natural disturbances. Subsequent salvage logging, a widespread management practice conducted predominantly to recover economic capital, produces further disturbance and impacts biodiversity worldwide. Hence, naturally disturbed forests are among the most threatened habitats in the world, with consequences for their associated biodiversity. However, there are no evidence-based benchmarks for the proportion of area of naturally disturbed forests to be excluded from salvage logging to conserve biodiversity. We apply a mixed rarefaction/extrapolation approach to a global multi-taxa dataset from disturbed forests, including birds, plants, insects and fungi, to close this gap. We find that 75 ± 7% (mean ± SD) of a naturally disturbed area of a forest needs to be left unlogged to maintain 90% richness of its unique species, whereas retaining 50% of a naturally disturbed forest unlogged maintains 73 ± 12% of its unique species richness. These values do not change with the time elapsed since disturbance but vary considerably among taxonomic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Thorn
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany.
| | - Anne Chao
- Institute of Statistics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, 30043, Taiwan
| | - Kostadin B Georgiev
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany
- Bavarian Forest National Park, Freyunger Str. 2, 94481, Grafenau, Germany
| | - Jörg Müller
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany
- Bavarian Forest National Park, Freyunger Str. 2, 94481, Grafenau, Germany
| | - Claus Bässler
- Department of Biodiversity Conservation, Goethe University Frankfurt, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Institute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, D-60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - John L Campbell
- Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, 321 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| | - Jorge Castro
- Department of Ecology, University of Granada, Campus Fuentenueva s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain
| | - Yan-Han Chen
- Institute of Statistics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, 30043, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Yong Choi
- Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Bioresources, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
| | - Tyler P Cobb
- Royal Alberta Museum, Edmonton, AB, T5J 0G2, Canada
| | - Daniel C Donato
- School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Ewa Durska
- Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ellen Macdonald
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H1, Canada
| | - Heike Feldhaar
- Department of Animal Ecology I, Bayreuth Center for Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, 95447, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Joseph B Fontaine
- Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia
| | - Paula J Fornwalt
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO, 80526, USA
| | | | - Richard L Hutto
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA
| | - Matti Koivula
- Natural Resources Institute (LUKE), P. O. Box 2, FI-00791, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eun-Jae Lee
- Urban Planning Research Group, Daejeon Sejong Research Institute, Daejeon, 34863, Korea
| | - David Lindenmayer
- Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Grzegorz Mikusiński
- Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU, SE-730 91, Riddarhyttan, Sweden
- School for Forest Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU, Box 43, SE-739 21, Skinnskatteberg, Sweden
| | - Martin K Obrist
- WSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | - Michal Perlík
- Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 1760, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
- Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Branisovska 31, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
| | - Josep Rost
- Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Girona. Facultat de Ciències, Carrer Maria Aurèlia Capmany, Campus de Montilivi, 17003, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Kaysandra Waldron
- Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 rue du P.E.P.S., P.O. Box 10380, Stn. Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC, G1V 4C7, Canada
| | - Beat Wermelinger
- WSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Forest Health and Biotic Interactions-Forest Entomology, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | | | - Michał Żmihorski
- Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Stoczek 1, 17-230, Białowieża, Poland
| | - Alexandro B Leverkus
- Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, 96181, Rauhenebrach, Germany
- Department of Ecology, University of Granada, Campus Fuentenueva s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Bried J, Ries L, Smith B, Patten M, Abbott J, Ball-Damerow J, Cannings R, Cordero-Rivera A, Córdoba-Aguilar A, De Marco P, Dijkstra KD, Dolný A, van Grunsven R, Halstead D, Harabiš F, Hassall C, Jeanmougin M, Jones C, Juen L, Kalkman V, Kietzka G, Mazzacano CS, Orr A, Perron MA, Rocha-Ortega M, Sahlén G, Samways M, Siepielski A, Simaika J, Suhling F, Underhill L, White E. Towards Global Volunteer Monitoring of Odonate Abundance. Bioscience 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractInsects are reportedly experiencing widespread declines, but we generally have sparse data on their abundance. Correcting this shortfall will take more effort than professional entomologists alone can manage. Volunteer nature enthusiasts can greatly help to monitor the abundance of dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata), iconic freshwater sentinels and one of the few nonpollinator insect groups appreciated by the public and amenable to citizen science. Although counting individual odonates is common in some locations, current data will not enable a global perspective on odonate abundance patterns and trends. Borrowing insight from butterfly monitoring efforts, we outline basic plans for a global volunteer network to count odonates, including organizational structure, advertising and recruiting, and data collection, submission, and synthesis. We hope our proposal serves as a catalyst for richer coordinated efforts to understand population trends of odonates and other insects in the Anthropocene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Bried
- Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign
| | - Leslie Ries
- Department of Biology at Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Brenda Smith
- Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman
| | - Michael Patten
- Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman
| | - John Abbott
- Alabama Museum of Natural History, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
| | | | | | | | - Alex Córdoba-Aguilar
- Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, México
| | - Paulo De Marco
- Departamento de Ecología, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
| | | | - Aleš Dolný
- Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Roy van Grunsven
- De Vlinderstichting, Dutch Butterfly Conservation, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - David Halstead
- School of Natural Resources and the Built Environment at Saskatchewan Polytechnic, Prince Albert, Canada
| | - Filip Harabiš
- Department of Ecology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Christopher Hassall
- Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Jeanmougin
- Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes—CNRS, Grenoble, France
| | - Colin Jones
- Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Canada
| | - Leandro Juen
- Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Pará, Brazil
| | | | - Gabriella Kietzka
- Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | | | - Albert Orr
- Environmental Futures Research Institute at Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mary Ann Perron
- Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maya Rocha-Ortega
- Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, México
| | - Göran Sahlén
- Ecology and Environmental Science, RLAS at Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Michael Samways
- Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Adam Siepielski
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
| | - John Simaika
- Department of Water Science and Engineering at IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Frank Suhling
- Institute of Geoecology at Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Les Underhill
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
| | - Erin White
- New York Natural Heritage Program, Albany, New York
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Newbold T, Oppenheimer P, Etard A, Williams JJ. Tropical and Mediterranean biodiversity is disproportionately sensitive to land-use and climate change. Nat Ecol Evol 2020; 4:1630-1638. [PMID: 32929240 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01303-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Global biodiversity is undergoing rapid declines, driven in large part by changes to land use and climate. Global models help us to understand the consequences of environmental changes for biodiversity, but tend to neglect important geographical variation in the sensitivity of biodiversity to these changes. Here we test whether biodiversity responses to climate change and land-use change differ among biomes (geographical units that have marked differences in environment and species composition). We find the strongest negative responses to both pressures in tropical biomes and in the Mediterranean. A further analysis points towards similar underlying drivers for the sensitivity to each pressure: we find both greater reductions in species richness in the types of land use most disturbed by humans and more negative predicted responses to climate change in areas of lower climatic seasonality, and in areas where a greater proportion of species are near their upper temperature limit. Within the land most modified by humans, reductions in biodiversity were particularly large in regions where humans have come to dominate the land more recently. Our results will help to improve predictions of how biodiversity is likely to change with ongoing climatic and land-use changes, pointing toward particularly large declines in the tropics where much future agricultural expansion is expected to occur. This finding could help to inform the development of the post-2020 biodiversity framework, by highlighting the under-studied regions where biodiversity losses are likely to be greatest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Newbold
- Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Philippa Oppenheimer
- Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Adrienne Etard
- Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jessica J Williams
- Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Bates AE, Primack RB, Moraga P, Duarte CM. COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a "Global Human Confinement Experiment" to investigate biodiversity conservation. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 2020; 248:108665. [PMID: 32549587 PMCID: PMC7284281 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Efforts to curtail the spread of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) have led to the unprecedented concurrent confinement of nearly two-thirds of the global population. The large human lockdown and its eventual relaxation can be viewed as a Global Human Confinement Experiment. This experiment is a unique opportunity to identify positive and negative effects of human presence and mobility on a range of natural systems, including wildlife, and protected areas, and to study processes regulating biodiversity and ecosystems. We encourage ecologists, environmental scientists, and resource managers to contribute their observations to efforts aiming to build comprehensive global understanding based on multiple data streams, including anecdotal observations, systematic assessments and quantitative monitoring. We argue that the collective power of combining diverse data will transcend the limited value of the individual data sets and produce unexpected insights. We can also consider the confinement experiment as a "stress test" to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses in the adequacy of existing networks to detect human impacts on natural systems. Doing so will provide evidence for the value of the conservation strategies that are presently in place, and create future networks, observatories and policies that are more adept in protecting biological diversity across the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E. Bates
- Department of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1C 5S7, Canada
- Corresponding author.
| | - Richard B. Primack
- Biology Department, Boston University, 5 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Paula Moraga
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
| | - Carlos M. Duarte
- Red Sea Research Center (RSRC) and Computational Biosciences Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Daskalova GN, Myers-Smith IH, Bjorkman AD, Blowes SA, Supp SR, Magurran AE, Dornelas M. Landscape-scale forest loss as a catalyst of population and biodiversity change. Science 2020; 368:1341-1347. [PMID: 32554591 DOI: 10.1126/science.aba1289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Global biodiversity assessments have highlighted land-use change as a key driver of biodiversity change. However, there is little empirical evidence of how habitat transformations such as forest loss and gain are reshaping biodiversity over time. We quantified how change in forest cover has influenced temporal shifts in populations and ecological assemblages from 6090 globally distributed time series across six taxonomic groups. We found that local-scale increases and decreases in abundance, species richness, and temporal species replacement (turnover) were intensified by as much as 48% after forest loss. Temporal lags in population- and assemblage-level shifts after forest loss extended up to 50 years and increased with species' generation time. Our findings that forest loss catalyzes population and biodiversity change emphasize the complex biotic consequences of land-use change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gergana N Daskalova
- School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, Scotland.
| | - Isla H Myers-Smith
- School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, Scotland
| | - Anne D Bjorkman
- Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.,Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Shane A Blowes
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), 04103 Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06108 Halle (Salle), Germany
| | - Sarah R Supp
- Data Analytics Program, Denison University, Granville, OH 43023, USA
| | - Anne E Magurran
- Centre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TF, Scotland
| | - Maria Dornelas
- Centre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TF, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Jones FAM, Dornelas M, Magurran AE. Recent increases in assemblage rarity are linked to increasing local immigration. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2020; 7:192045. [PMID: 32874609 PMCID: PMC7428220 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.192045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
As pressures on biodiversity increase, a better understanding of how assemblages are responding is needed. Because rare species, defined here as those that have locally low abundances, make up a high proportion of assemblage species lists, understanding how the number of rare species within assemblages is changing will help elucidate patterns of recent biodiversity change. Here, we show that the number of rare species within assemblages is increasing, on average, across systems. This increase could arise in two ways: species already present in the assemblage decreasing in abundance but with no increase in extinctions, or additional species entering the assemblage in low numbers associated with an increase in immigration. The positive relationship between change in rarity and change in species richness provides evidence for the second explanation, i.e. higher net immigration than extinction among the rare species. These measurable changes in the structure of assemblages in the recent past underline the need to use multiple biodiversity metrics to understand biodiversity change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith A. M. Jones
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK
- Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Maria Dornelas
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK
- School of Biology, Scottish Oceans Institute, St Andrews, UK
| | - Anne E. Magurran
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK
- School of Biology, Scottish Oceans Institute, St Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Li D, Olden JD, Lockwood JL, Record S, McKinney ML, Baiser B. Changes in taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity in the Anthropocene. Proc Biol Sci 2020; 287:20200777. [PMID: 32546087 PMCID: PMC7329034 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
To better understand how ecosystems are changing, a multifaceted approach to measuring biodiversity that considers species richness (SR) and evolutionary history across spatial scales is needed. Here, we compiled 162 datasets for fish, bird and plant assemblages across the globe and measured how taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity changed at different spatial scales (within site α diversity and between sites spatial β diversity). Biodiversity change is measured from these datasets in three ways: across land use gradients, from species lists, and through sampling of the same locations across two time periods. We found that local SR and phylogenetic α diversity (Faith's PD (phylogenetic diversity)) increased for all taxonomic groups. However, when measured with a metric that is independent of SR (phylogenetic species variation, PSV), phylogenetic α diversity declined for all taxonomic groups. Land use datasets showed declines in SR, Faith's PD and PSV. For all taxonomic groups and data types, spatial taxonomic and phylogenetic β diversity decreased when measured with Sorensen dissimilarity and phylogenetic Sorensen dissimilarity, respectively, providing strong evidence of global biotic homogenization. The decoupling of α and β diversity, as well as taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity, highlights the need for a broader perspective on contemporary biodiversity changes. Conservation and environmental policy decisions thus need to consider biodiversity beyond local SR to protect biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daijiang Li
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Julian D. Olden
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Julie L. Lockwood
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Sydne Record
- Department of Biology, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010, USA
| | - Michael L. McKinney
- Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - Benjamin Baiser
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Rosa IM, Purvis A, Alkemade R, Chaplin-Kramer R, Ferrier S, Guerra CA, Hurtt G, Kim H, Leadley P, Martins IS, Popp A, Schipper AM, van Vuuren D, Pereira HM. Challenges in producing policy-relevant global scenarios of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Glob Ecol Conserv 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
133
|
Jiménez-Franco MV, Martínez JE, Pagán I, Calvo JF. Long-term population monitoring of a territorial forest raptor species. Sci Data 2020; 7:166. [PMID: 32483157 PMCID: PMC7264124 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0503-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
We provide field monitoring data of a territorial raptor (the booted eagle, Hieraaetus pennatus), that was intensively monitored over a period of 18 years (1998-2015) in a Mediterranean forested area of south-eastern Spain designated as a Special Protection Area (Natura 2000 Network) for this species. The data set compiles all the relevant information about the occupation of territories and nests, reproductive ecology, long-term monitoring of marked individuals and influence of parent's colour morph on brood size. Several questions concerning the population ecology of forest-dwelling raptors and factors conditioning territorial occupancy, such as location cues or site fidelity, are addressed. This type of long-term population monitoring has high potential for replication, reuse and comparison purposes, providing insights for monitoring other long-lived, territorial species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María V Jiménez-Franco
- Departamento de Ecología e Hidrología, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
- Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain.
| | - José E Martínez
- Departamento de Ecología e Hidrología, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Bonelli's Eagle Study and Conservation Group, Murcia, Spain
| | - Iluminada Pagán
- Departamento de Ecología e Hidrología, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - José F Calvo
- Departamento de Ecología e Hidrología, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Morelli F, Benedetti Y, Callaghan CT. Ecological specialization and population trends in European breeding birds. Glob Ecol Conserv 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
135
|
van Klink R, Bowler DE, Gongalsky KB, Swengel AB, Gentile A, Chase JM. Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances. Science 2020; 368:417-420. [PMID: 32327596 DOI: 10.1126/science.aax9931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 439] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Recent case studies showing substantial declines of insect abundances have raised alarm, but how widespread such patterns are remains unclear. We compiled data from 166 long-term surveys of insect assemblages across 1676 sites to investigate trends in insect abundances over time. Overall, we found considerable variation in trends even among adjacent sites but an average decline of terrestrial insect abundance by ~9% per decade and an increase of freshwater insect abundance by ~11% per decade. Both patterns were largely driven by strong trends in North America and some European regions. We found some associations with potential drivers (e.g., land-use drivers), and trends in protected areas tended to be weaker. Our findings provide a more nuanced view of spatiotemporal patterns of insect abundance trends than previously suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roel van Klink
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. .,Leipzig University, 04109 Leipzig, Germany.,WBBS Foundation, 9409 TV, Loon, Netherlands
| | - Diana E Bowler
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany.,Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), 04318 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Konstantin B Gongalsky
- A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119071, Russia.,M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | | | - Alessandro Gentile
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jonathan M Chase
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Computer Science, Martin Luther University-Halle Wittenberg, 06099 Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Comte
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Jonathan Lenoir
- UR "Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés" (EDYSAN), UMR7058 CNRS, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Temperature-related biodiversity change across temperate marine and terrestrial systems. Nat Ecol Evol 2020; 4:927-933. [PMID: 32367031 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1185-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Climate change is reshaping global biodiversity as species respond to changing temperatures. However, the net effects of climate-driven species redistribution on local assemblage diversity remain unknown. Here, we relate trends in species richness and abundance from 21,500 terrestrial and marine assemblage time series across temperate regions (23.5-60.0° latitude) to changes in air or sea surface temperature. We find a strong coupling between biodiversity and temperature changes in the marine realm, where species richness mostly increases with warming. However, biodiversity responses are conditional on the baseline climate, such that in initially warmer locations richness increase is more pronounced while abundance declines with warming. In contrast, we do not detect systematic temperature-related richness or abundance trends on land, despite a greater magnitude of warming. As the world is committed to further warming, substantial challenges remain in maintaining local biodiversity amongst the non-uniform inflow and outflow of 'climate migrants'. Temperature-driven community restructuring is especially evident in the ocean, whereas climatic debt may be accumulating on land.
Collapse
|
138
|
Spatio-temporal patterns of northern gannet abundance in a migratory and wintering area. ZOOLOGY 2020; 140:125776. [PMID: 32298991 DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2020.125776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
In marine ecosystems, seabird populations are well monitored, thus allowing their use as indicators of system fluctuations at multiple spatio-temporal scales. Population abundance estimates are essential features of any conservation and management measures and initiatives. Population abundances can be used to delineate the distribution range and foraging grounds of species during both breeding and non-breeding periods, with multi-annual monitoring allowing for the inspection of the temporal variability within key marine areas. Taking advantage of long-term monitoring schemes, we examined the annual abundance patterns of the northern gannet Morus bassanus in its southern European migratory flyway. Here, the presence of a topographical feature (i.e. a submarine canyon system) could influence physical processes (e.g. upwelling, alongshore currents, and riverine inputs), thus oceanographically differentiating canyon and shelf ecosystems within a spatially restricted marine area. We assessed seasonal and long-term trend fluctuations of monthly northern gannet abundance using Generalized Additive Mixed Models, yielding only a strong seasonal effect. Moreover, we jointly tested the effect of the phenology and the spatial domain (canyon versus shelf) on northern gannet abundance using Generalised Linear Mixed Models, accounting for the excess of zeros. Northern gannet abundance was higher during the pre-winter and post-winter migration, corresponding to its southward and northward movements in the NE Atlantic, respectively. The effect of the canyon was only detected during the post-winter migration. By age, adult northern gannets were more abundant in some periods of the year (from October to March, including the pre-winter migration, the wintering and the post-winter migration), whereas juveniles and immatures were especially abundant during the pre-winter period. Our results could provide quantitative baseline information of northern gannet spatio-temporal patterns in a migratory and wintering area important for both research and conservation efforts, given the high conservation value of the area within the Natura 2000 network.
Collapse
|
139
|
Blowes SA, Supp SR, Antão LH, Bates A, Bruelheide H, Chase JM, Moyes F, Magurran A, McGill B, Myers-Smith IH, Winter M, Bjorkman AD, Bowler DE, Byrnes JEK, Gonzalez A, Hines J, Isbell F, Jones HP, Navarro LM, Thompson PL, Vellend M, Waldock C, Dornelas M. The geography of biodiversity change in marine and terrestrial assemblages. Science 2020; 366:339-345. [PMID: 31624208 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw1620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 244] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Human activities are fundamentally altering biodiversity. Projections of declines at the global scale are contrasted by highly variable trends at local scales, suggesting that biodiversity change may be spatially structured. Here, we examined spatial variation in species richness and composition change using more than 50,000 biodiversity time series from 239 studies and found clear geographic variation in biodiversity change. Rapid compositional change is prevalent, with marine biomes exceeding and terrestrial biomes trailing the overall trend. Assemblage richness is not changing on average, although locations exhibiting increasing and decreasing trends of up to about 20% per year were found in some marine studies. At local scales, widespread compositional reorganization is most often decoupled from richness change, and biodiversity change is strongest and most variable in the oceans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane A Blowes
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany. .,Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Computer Science, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Sarah R Supp
- Data Analytics Program, Denison University, Granville, OH, USA.
| | - Laura H Antão
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK.,Department of Biology and CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.,Research Centre for Ecological Change, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Amanda Bates
- Department of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Helge Bruelheide
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany.,Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Jonathan M Chase
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany.,Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Computer Science, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Faye Moyes
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK
| | - Anne Magurran
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK
| | - Brian McGill
- School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA
| | | | - Marten Winter
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anne D Bjorkman
- Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Diana E Bowler
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jarrett E K Byrnes
- Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Gonzalez
- Department of Biology, Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jes Hines
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany.,Leipzig University, Institute of Biology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Forest Isbell
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Holly P Jones
- Department of Biological Sciences and Institute for the Study of the Environment, Sustainability, and Energy, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA
| | - Laetitia M Navarro
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany.,Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Patrick L Thompson
- Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mark Vellend
- Département de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Conor Waldock
- Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK & Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK
| | - Maria Dornelas
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Hastings RA, Rutterford LA, Freer JJ, Collins RA, Simpson SD, Genner MJ. Climate Change Drives Poleward Increases and Equatorward Declines in Marine Species. Curr Biol 2020; 30:1572-1577.e2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Revised: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
141
|
Kim MJ, Cho ME, Jun HJ. Developing Design Solutions for Smart Homes Through User-Centered Scenarios. Front Psychol 2020; 11:335. [PMID: 32265767 PMCID: PMC7100148 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The success of smart homes is fundamentally dependent on their adoption and use by people in the context of daily life. This study investigated ways to control and adapt the technology to fulfill user daily needs, which are the active drivers of smart housing technology adoption. A framework of smart home services was developed by focusing on the practicability of each variable from the perspective of supporting user experience. By developing scenarios based on previous studies, we identified residents' behaviors and intentions regarding smart home technology and its use. Their issues were identified through the health problems and daily activities identified in the scenarios, and customized smart home services were developed for each resident based on technical solutions, space requirements, and design solutions. The main strength of this study is the adoption of user-centered methods to build a rich picture of the issues that affect households and the community related to the design, installation, and use of technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Jeong Kim
- School of Architecture, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Myung Eun Cho
- School of Architecture, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
- Construction Research Institute, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Han Jong Jun
- School of Architecture, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Huang TY, Downs MR, Ma J, Zhao B. Collaboration across Time and Space in the LTER Network. Bioscience 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
The scale of ecological research is getting larger and larger. At such scales, collaboration is indispensable, but there is little consensus on what factors enable collaboration. In the present article, we investigated the temporal and spatial pattern of institutional collaboration within the US Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network on the basis of the bibliographic database. Social network analysis and the Monte Carlo method were applied to identify the characteristics of papers published by LTER researchers within a baseline of papers from 158 leading ecological journals. Long-term and long-distance collaboration were more frequent in the LTER Network, and we investigate and discuss the underlying mechanisms. We suggest that the maturing infrastructure and environment for collaboration within the LTER Network could encourage scientists to make large-scale hypotheses and to ask big questions in ecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian-Yuan Huang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Martha R Downs
- Long Term Ecological Research Network Office, National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara
| | - Jun Ma
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin Zhao
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
BDcleaner: A workflow for cleaning taxonomic and geographic errors in occurrence data archived in biodiversity databases. Glob Ecol Conserv 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
|
144
|
Knight CA, Blois JL, Blonder B, Macias-Fauria M, Ordonez A, Svenning JC. Community Assembly and Climate Mismatch in Late Quaternary Eastern North American Pollen Assemblages. Am Nat 2020; 195:166-180. [PMID: 32017614 DOI: 10.1086/706340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Plant community response to climate change ranges from synchronous tracking to strong mismatch. Explaining this variation in climate change response is critical for accurate global change modeling. Here we quantify how closely assemblages track changes in climate (match/mismatch) and how broadly climate niches are spread within assemblages (narrow/broad ecological tolerance, or "filtering") using data for the past 21,000 years for 531 eastern North American fossil pollen assemblages. Although climate matching has been strong over the last 21 millennia, mismatch increased in 30% of assemblages during the rapid climate shifts between 14.5 and 10 ka. Assemblage matching rebounded toward the present day in 10%-20% of assemblages. Climate-assemblage mismatch was greater in tree-dominated and high-latitude assemblages, consistent with persisting populations, slower dispersal rates, and glacial retreat. In contrast, climate matching was greater for assemblages comprising taxa with higher median seed mass. More than half of the assemblages were climatically filtered at any given time, with peak filtering occurring at 8.5 ka for nearly 80% of assemblages. Thus, vegetation assemblages have highly variable rates of climate mismatch and filtering over millennial scales. These climate responses can be partially predicted by species' traits and life histories. These findings help constrain predictions for plant community response to contemporary climate change.
Collapse
|
145
|
Rydén O, Zizka A, Jagers SC, Lindberg SI, Antonelli A. Linking democracy and biodiversity conservation: Empirical evidence and research gaps. AMBIO 2020; 49:419-433. [PMID: 31236785 PMCID: PMC6965076 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01210-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Increasing human pressure threatens plant and animal species with extinction worldwide. National political institutions constitute an important arena for biodiversity conservation. Yet, the relationship between how democratic these national institutions are and a country's efforts towards and track-record for biodiversity conservation remains poorly understood. In this review, we outline the theoretical links between democracy and biodiversity conservation and review the empirical literature testing them. While more studies reported a positive than a negative relation between democracy and biodiversity conservation (15 vs. 11), the most common result was a mixed relationship (28), often conditioned on economic factors. The use of different proxies to measure biodiversity, including deforestation, protected areas, threatened species, and fishery statistics emerged as a primary obstacle for synthesis. We suggest overcoming this caveat together with a consistent definition of democratic institutions and a standardized statistical framework as research priorities to improve policies against the global biodiversity loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oskar Rydén
- Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Box 711, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre for Collective Action Research, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Alexander Zizka
- Varieties of Democracy Institute, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), University of Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sverker C. Jagers
- Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Box 711, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre for Collective Action Research, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Staffan I. Lindberg
- Varieties of Democracy Institute, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Box 711, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Alexandre Antonelli
- Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Royal Botanical Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE UK
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Compagnoni A, Bibian AJ, Ochocki BM, Levin S, Zhu K, Miller TEX. popler: An
r
package for extraction and synthesis of population time series from the long‐term ecological research (LTER) network. Methods Ecol Evol 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Compagnoni
- Department of BioSciences Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Rice University Houston TX USA
- Institute of Biology Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
| | - Andrew J. Bibian
- Department of BioSciences Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Rice University Houston TX USA
| | - Brad M. Ochocki
- Department of BioSciences Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Rice University Houston TX USA
| | - Sam Levin
- Institute of Biology Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
| | - Kai Zhu
- Department of Environmental Studies University of California Santa Cruz CA USA
| | - Tom E. X. Miller
- Department of BioSciences Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Rice University Houston TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Affiliation(s)
- Britas Klemens Eriksson
- Marine Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
| | - Helmut Hillebrand
- Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, University of Oldenberg, Wilhelmshaven, Germany. .,Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity Oldenburg and Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Falaschi M, Manenti R, Thuiller W, Ficetola GF. Continental-scale determinants of population trends in European amphibians and reptiles. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2019; 25:3504-3515. [PMID: 31220393 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The continuous decline of biodiversity is determined by the complex and joint effects of multiple environmental drivers. Still, a large part of past global change studies reporting and explaining biodiversity trends have focused on a single driver. Therefore, we are often unable to attribute biodiversity changes to different drivers, since a multivariable design is required to disentangle joint effects and interactions. In this work, we used a meta-regression within a Bayesian framework to analyze 843 time series of population abundance from 17 European amphibian and reptile species over the last 45 years. We investigated the relative effects of climate change, alien species, habitat availability, and habitat change in driving trends of population abundance over time, and evaluated how the importance of these factors differs across species. A large number of populations (54%) declined, but differences between species were strong, with some species showing positive trends. Populations declined more often in areas with a high number of alien species, and in areas where climate change has caused loss of suitability. Habitat features showed small variation over the last 25 years, with an average loss of suitable habitat of 0.1%/year per population. Still, a strong interaction between habitat availability and the richness of alien species indicated that the negative impact of alien species was particularly strong for populations living in landscapes with less suitable habitat. Furthermore, when excluding the two commonest species, habitat loss was the main correlate of negative population trends for the remaining species. By analyzing trends for multiple species across a broad spatial scale, we identify alien species, climate change, and habitat changes as the major drivers of European amphibian and reptile decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Falaschi
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Raoul Manenti
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Wilfried Thuiller
- Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (LECA), Université Grenoble Alpes, University of Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble, France
| | - Gentile Francesco Ficetola
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (LECA), Université Grenoble Alpes, University of Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Ryo M, Aguilar-Trigueros CA, Pinek L, Muller LA, Rillig MC. Basic Principles of Temporal Dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol 2019; 34:723-733. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
150
|
Craven D, Winter M, Hotzel K, Gaikwad J, Eisenhauer N, Hohmuth M, König-Ries B, Wirth C. Evolution of interdisciplinarity in biodiversity science. Ecol Evol 2019; 9:6744-6755. [PMID: 31327991 PMCID: PMC6640045 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The study of biodiversity has grown exponentially in the last thirty years in response to demands for greater understanding of the function and importance of Earth's biodiversity and finding solutions to conserve it. Here, we test the hypothesis that biodiversity science has become more interdisciplinary over time. To do so, we analyze 97,945 peer‐reviewed articles over a twenty‐two‐year time period (1990–2012) with a continuous time dynamic model, which classifies articles into concepts (i.e., topics and ideas) based on word co‐occurrences. Using the model output, we then quantify different aspects of interdisciplinarity: concept diversity, that is, the diversity of topics and ideas across subdisciplines in biodiversity science, subdiscipline diversity, that is, the diversity of subdisciplines across concepts, and network structure, which captures interactions between concepts and subdisciplines. We found that, on average, concept and subdiscipline diversity in biodiversity science were either stable or declining, patterns which were driven by the persistence of rare concepts and subdisciplines and a decline in the diversity of common concepts and subdisciplines, respectively. Moreover, our results provide evidence that conceptual homogenization, that is, decreases in temporal β concept diversity, underlies the observed trends in interdisciplinarity. Together, our results reveal that biodiversity science is undergoing a dynamic phase as a scientific discipline that is consolidating around a core set of concepts. Our results suggest that progress toward addressing the biodiversity crisis via greater interdisciplinarity during the study period may have been slowed by extrinsic factors, such as the failure to invest in research spanning across concepts and disciplines. However, recent initiatives such as the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) may attract broader support for biodiversity‐related issues and hence interdisciplinary approaches to address scientific, political, and societal challenges in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Craven
- Biodiversity Macroecology & Biogeography, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marten Winter
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Jitendra Gaikwad
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Nico Eisenhauer
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Hohmuth
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Birgitta König-Ries
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Christian Wirth
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.,Max-Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|